Anthrax is a highly
infectious disease caused by spores from a bacterium known as Bacillus
anthracis. These spores resist destruction; can lie dormant for centuries;
and may be present in the soil for decades, infecting grazing animals (primarily
goats, sheep, and cattle) that ingest the spores.
Third-world countries, especially agricultural-based
economies, continue to report cases of human anthrax. But it occurs far less
frequently in advanced nations (at the present time, about 130 cases per year in
the U.S.).
How contracted. You cannot catch anthrax from humans.
Infection can only occur from three sources of exposure:
The first is skin contact with live infected animals
or with the hide, hair, or bones of an infected animal. This can cause cutaneous
(skin) anthrax infection, which is the most common type, accounting for more
than 95% of cases. About 20% of untreated cases are fatal.
The second is eating undercooked or raw infected meat.
This can cause gastrointestinal anthrax infection, which kills about 20% to 60%
of those not immediately treated.
The third is breathing in airborne spores. This may lead to pulmonary
(or inhalation) anthrax. This form has a high mortality rate of 80% to 90% or
higher. Those who are infected generally die within a few days.
Three stages of infection. The first phase of the
infection occurs for up to five days after inhalation of the spores. The patient
has flu-like symptoms, such as cough, fatigue, and mild fever.
During the second stage, conditions improve as the
body tries to fight the disease. But quite rapidly, the third stage
begins, and a severe respiratory infection occurs. Fever, usually accompanied by
chest pain occurs, and there is fluid in the lungs. Within a day, septic shock
and death generally occur.
Antibiotics are the primary method of treatment, but only
useful if given immediately after exposure.
Symptoms. Here is a more complete description of
symptoms, not all of which will be experienced by the same victim of the
vaccine:
The early symptoms include headaches, malaise, respiratory
distress, chills, diarrhea (sometimes bloody), fever, and abdominal cramping.
Symptoms often worsen after the third or fourth shot (of the six). Later chronic
symptoms include dizziness, chronic fatigue, chest pains, sleep disorders,
memory loss, headaches, joint and muscle pain, peripheral sensory neuropathies,
intermittent diarrhea, abdominal pain, and recurring rashes. Other known
symptoms include blackouts, autoimmune diseases, swelling of the limbs, nausea,
night sweats, muscle and joint pain, ringing in the ears, cysts, tunnel vision,
seizures, and fatigue.
Nearly fifty different reactions have been reported from the
shot.
An untested vaccine. The original anthrax vaccine used in the U.S. was
later modified, and the manufacturing process was changed. But a patent was
later issued to the U.S. army on a vaccine (called an anthrax
"antigen") using a still different process. The army applied for a
license for this vaccine in 1967. But the original study of this antigen vaccine
was never documented, nor were the results published. It is believed that the
army wanted them kept secret. Yet it was the vaccine for which the license was
granted (Thomas L. Rempfer and Russ Dingle, "Information Paper for
American’s Policymakers," W. Suffield, CT, October 26, 1999, p. 7).
Thus the current anthrax vaccine has never had proper testing
and was never properly licensed as considered safe and effective by the FDA. The
only legitimate license was granted for the original vaccine, before it was
changed. The Defense Department, in its paperwork, does not acknowledge the
existence of this second unlicensed vaccine—yet it was the one given to
servicemen in the Gulf War and from the later 1990s onward. This provides an
interesting background to the anthrax vaccine crisis we live with today.
Officially "undefined." The vaccine has three
parts: the protective antigen, edema factor, and lethal factor. Safe vaccines
balance the three. But this vaccine is termed "undefined" by both
civilian and military medical experts, and the ingredients vary from lot to lot,
affecting potency and safety.
The best record of how safe it is. In this brief chapter,
we will primarily look at how the U.S. military is making use of the anthrax
vaccine, its effects, and the cover-up associated with it. This is because the
Pentagon has used it extensively on U.S. troops, whereas it has not been given
to many civilians. Learning what happened to our troops, we can know whether we
will later want such an injection ourselves.
Pentagon denial. The Defense Department denies any
connection between anthrax and the Gulf War Syndrome, just as it denied the
existence of that Gulf War illness for at least the first five years after that
war. More than 130 studies have been funded by the Defense Department, to
investigate the causes of Gulf War Syndrome; yet not one has looked specifically
at the anthrax vaccine—although 16 other causes have been considered.
British study. But one study done by the British government showed a high
correlation of the syndrome in those who received the British anthrax vaccine (C.E.
Fulco, "Health of UK Servicemen Who Served in the Persian Gulf War,"
The Lancet, January 16, 1999, p. 169).
Further checking refused. The closest we ever got to
investigating the relationship were several high-level briefings, which
concluded that there was no connection; and recommendation was made against
further research into any U.S. correlation of anthrax vaccine to the Gulf War
Syndrome.
Second vaccine entirely different. After the vaccine had
been used for years on Americans, at a General Accounting Office (GAO) hearing
in 1999, Kwai Chan testified that "these two vaccines, the original and the
newly licensed one of the ’70s, were made using different processes and have
different data to support their safety. While these studies identified varying
rates of adverse reactions, they did not question the safety of the
vaccine" (Kwai Chan, testifying before the House Government Reform
Committee, May 7, 1999). In spite of varying amounts of response and
infection in the second version, which had never been tested, our military did
no investigations.
Inadequate data. Another interesting statement was made
nearly a year later: "In the peer-reviewed literature there is
inadequate/insufficient evidence to determine whether an association does or
does not exist between anthrax vaccination and long-term adverse health
outcomes" (Conclusion of the National Academy of Sciences’ Institute
of Medicine Committee on Health Effects Associated with Exposures during the
Gulf War, March 30, 2000).
Those are big words, for "We don’t know and have never
tried to find out."
Two shocking studies. Although the Defense Department, itself, never did
any studies on the vaccine, there is some other data on the vaccination results (from
a Statement by Kwai Chan, hearing before the Subcomittee on National Security,
Veterans Affairs and International Relations, Committee on Government Reform,
U.S. House of Representatives, May 7, 1999, p. 2):
• A 1997 Pittman study focused on 508 doses given. They
revealed high local reactions of 21% (with 5% moderate or severe), plus high
amounts of systemic reactions: 29% mild and 14% moderate or severe.
• The CDC reported on 4,000 doses given. Local reactions
were up to 30%, with 10% moderate or severe.
A Korean study. Using the same vaccine, a Korean study of
337 troops showed reaction rates of minor to severe of 40% for men and 70% for
women. For a lengthy period of time afterward, 3% of the men and 8% of the women
had a reduced work rate (Redmond Handy, "Analysis of DOD’s Anthrax
Vaccine Immunization Program [AVIP]," report submitted to Call for Amnesty
Press Conference, Washington, D.C., February 12, 2001, p. 2). A Fort Bragg study
revealed a 44% reaction rate.
75% reaction rate. Testifying before Congress, data was
given that one Air National Guard squadron reported a 75% systemic rate of
reactions from the anthrax vaccine. Many were too weak to work. These are men
and women who formerly were in the best possible physical health. Some took more
than eight weeks to get a diagnosis and treatment.
50% reduction. Dr. Renata Engler, chief of the
allergy-immunology department at Walter Reed Hospital, said that, of those
vaccinated at Dover Air Force Base, 25 service members reported Gulf War
illness-like symptoms, resulting in a 50% reduction in function.
Such high rates of reaction are astounding, in view of the
fact that the Pentagon is determined to vaccinate 2.4 million military
personnel.
2.4 million before 2005. The Pentagon is determined to
inject all 2.4 million service people with anthrax before 2005, without arousing
the opposition of the American public.
The notorious VAERS form. VAERS are Vaccine Adverse Event Report System
forms. One is to be filled out each time a service person has a bad reaction
from a vaccine. But it is known that frequently the military either does not
fill them out or discards them afterward. They do not want evidence of injury
from the anthrax vaccine.
Instead of protecting service personnel from injury from the
vaccine, the Pentagon appears anxious to protect itself and to protect the firm
which makes the dangerous vaccine.
Indemnification. In September 1998, Secretary of the Army
Louis Caldera, on behalf of the Defense Department, granted indemnification from
legal liability to BioPort, the Michigan firm making the anthrax vaccine.
Protecting the firm. An earlier protection was signed in
1992, on a Secretary of the Army letterhead, for the preceding owner of that
plant. Here is part of that letter:
"The obligation assumed by MBPI under this contract
involves unusually hazardous risks associated with the potential for adverse
reactions in some recipients and the possibility that the desired
immunological effect will not be obtained by all recipients. There is no way
to be certain that the pathogen used in tests measuring vaccine efficacy will
be sufficient, or similar to the pathogen that U.S. forces might encounter to
confer immunity."—Redmond Handy, "Analysis of DOD’s Anthrax
Vaccine Immunization Program [AVIP]," report to Call for Amnesty Press
Conference, Washington, D.C., February 12, 2001, p. 12.
The truth about BioPort. Because a significant part of
the problem is the sloppy manner in which BioPort manufactures the vaccine, here
is a little history:
In September 1998, BioPort purchased the anthrax vaccine
manufacturing facility from the State of Michigan for $24 million (Keith J.
Costa, "Audit Paints ‘Bleak Picture’ of Anthrax Vaccine Maker’s
Viability," Inside the Pentagon, April 13, 2000, p. 14). Less than two
weeks later, BioPort was awarded a $45 million sole-source contract to supply
anthrax vaccine to the Pentagon.
Major Glenn MacDonald, USAR (retired), in his book, Greed and Guinea Pigs:
Risking the Health of the U.S. Military, revealed the background of this mess.
Also see David Oppliger, statement to House Majority Counsel to Democratic
members of the House Oversight and Ethics Committee, September 23, 1998.
Conflict of Interest. Two former directors at that
Michigan plant (Robert Myers and Robert van Ravenswaay) wanted to purchase the
facility, for they knew that major profits would accrue when the government
signed new contracts for the anthrax vaccine. But when Michigan State
Representative Lingg Brewer called it a conflict of interest, Myers stated in
the Lansing State Journal (November 30, 1996) that he was not involved in buying
the plant. He wrote: "I am a state employee . . this would be a conflict of
interest." The problem here was that, as the plant director, he knew of the
$130 million contract with the Pentagon as early as October 2, 1996, before the
purchase. This knowledge placed Myers and Ravenswaay in an unfairly advantageous
position.
Then, in January 1997, before the purchase, Myers and
Ravenswaay filed a for-profit corporation under the name MBPI, with 60,000
shares of stock. One week later, sale of the plant was authorized. On June 10,
the MBPI increased its shares to 1 million. In one letter, Myers confirmed that
he knew in advance of the confidential bids for the plant. The pair also
solicited financing from at least one other bidder, which was a violation of
nondisclosure requirements.
Myers and Ravenswaay later joined the board of BioPort, which
was the top bidder; and Myers became its chief scientific officer. The purchase
was announced on June 2, 1998. Both before and after the purchase, Myers had not
maintained proper quality controls at the plant, nor did he do so afterward.
Fuad El-Hibri enters. This same year, MBPI was resold to Fuad El-Hibri, a
man of Near Eastern (Lebanese) descent, who became a U.S. citizen a month after
the purchase. He called the firm BioPort. About three weeks after the purchase,
BioPort received a $29 million exclusive contract with the Department of Defense
to manufacture, test, bottle, and store the anthrax vaccine. Over the next five
years, BioPort was expected to produce $60 million worth of anthrax vaccine. By
August 2001, the Pentagon had given BioPort $126 million.
An admiral joins. There had been bidders lower than
BioPort; but former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Admiral William
Crowe, who only recently had retired, had been quickly placed on El-Hibri’s
BioPort board of directors. He immediately helped make sure that BioPort got the
plant.
Some believe Crowe had been rewarded for publicly defending
Clinton in his first presidential bid. At a time when few others would do so,
Crowe stood before the TV cameras and declared Clinton to be a good man. Later
still, Crowe was appointed ambassador to Britain, another high-paying job.
Where the money is spent. Records show that BioPort has
since spent millions on sidelines (such as $23,000 on the chief executive
officer’s furniture and $1.28 million in management bonuses for its
executives) while still not improving the quality of the vaccines. To this day,
BioPort continues to fail FDA inspections.
So much for the place where the vaccine is not properly made;
what happens to the people who take it?
Personal experiences. Thomas Heemstra, in his book,
Anthrax: A Deadly Shot in the Dark, described several incidents that he
personally knew of in the U.S. Air Force. Heemstra was an F-16 Fighter Squadron
Commander and had a successful military career spanning 20 years, with over
3,000 flying hours and 15 combat missions in the Middle East before he was
forced out of the military for refusing to take the anthrax vaccine. Here are a
few of many incidents he describes. Americans are frightened of anthrax and
smallpox terrorism; we need to become afraid of the vaccines against them!
Nine of Twelve. "In Battle Creek, Michigan, nine of twelve personnel
from a small unit preparing to deploy to the Middle East were given the shot and
became sick. Three of those were seriously ill. They were harassed and the
officers made an example of them. They were called malcontents and poor workers,
even though they had excellent work records. Worse, they could not get the
medical treatment they needed and deserved. Their symptoms were similar and very
troubling for any fighter pilot; these included memory loss, chills, fatigue,
muscle aches, and dizziness."—Heemstra, p. 38.
Aged 20 years. "Within six weeks of his fifth
shot, Master Sergeant Clearence McNamer of Vacaville, California, experienced
severe symptoms. He wrote to the Air Force Times, ‘I began to experience
severe insomnia, headaches, twitches in my right arm, involuntary tremors and
complete loss of scalp hair, eyebrows, and facial hair . . eyesight worsened,
hot and cold flashes, exhausted all the time, chest pains, shortness of
breath, and moments of memory loss. [I] feel and look like I’ve aged 20
years. Some of the symptoms have subsided, but I am concerned about the
long-term effects.’ With most people, the vaccine has its worst effects
after the third or fourth shot.
Can barely walk. "Laurie spoke to reporters for
her father, Air Force Reservist Earl Stover, because his symptoms are so
severe and limiting. He has health problems every day from ringing ears to
chronic fatigue to memory loss. Previously a very strong man who hung drywall,
[now] barely able to walk or keep his balance.
After two shots. "Jason Nietupski, an Army reservist, was diagnosed
with an autoimmune disorder case by the first shot and became markedly worse
after the next two. His symptoms ranged from sores all over his mouth to blood
clots in his legs, which make him unable to stand for long periods. Not only
does he suffer from chronic fatigue syndrome, but he has been diagnosed with an
allergic reaction called Stephen Johnson Syndrome. His medical records are six
to eight inches thick, from his own description.
Totally ruined. "Thomas J. Colisimo of
Pennsylvania, once an amateur weight-lifting competitor, now gets winded
pulling his wheelchair out of his pickup truck. He had the typical, fairly
serious symptoms from the first two shots. The third resulted in nine cysts on
his scalp that had to be surgically removed, one the size of a half-dollar.
Still, he didn’t associate these symptoms with the shot until his fourth one
in September 1999. From this, he lost 50 pounds and began unexpectedly passing
out. Three months later, he was suffering from fatigue, tunnel vision, and the
first of his blackouts which lasted 30 to 45 minutes. He suffers from
low-blood pressure, memory loss, depression, explosive and unexpected loss of
bowel control, and congnitive difficulties. Sleep apnea causes him to stop
breathing in his sleep up to 60 times per hour.
"Military doctors told him that the cysts were
probably from a milk allergy, that everything else was psychosomatic, and that
he was starving himself. They would not allow him to see his own medical
records, saying they were confidential. He was told that his symptoms were not
anthrax-related and that he had to take the fifth shot, which he
refused."—Heemstra, pp. 39-40.
Only the most capable men and women, in the very best
physical condition, are selected to fly fighter planes. Yet after a few
injections of an extremely small amount of fluid, many have been ruined for
life.
Really protective? Here is what two medical experts say
about that part of the anthrax vaccine, called the "protective
antigen," which is supposed to keep you from getting anthrax:
"No direct determination of the content or structure of the protective
antigen in the vaccine have been made, and it is unknown whether the protective
antigen is biologically active."—Dr. Philip Brachman and Colonel Arthur
Friedlander, M.D., Anthrax, in S.A. Plotkin and E.A. Mortimer, Jr. (eds),
Vaccines, p. 739. [Friedlander was chief of bacteriology at Fort Detrick, our
military headquarters for biological warfare research.]
Why then is this dangerous liquid being injected into
American citizens? If only one person is protected from taking any of the
dangerous shots described in this book, it will be worth the work it took to
write it.
Comparing medical claims. After the Vietnam War, 9.6% of
the veterans filed medical claims due to the war. The Korean War was 5% and
World War II was 6.6%. As of March 1, 2001, 36% of the Gulf War veterans have
filed claims! Yet that was from a war that only lasted a little over four days!
Astounding facts. Of the 700,000 military sent to the
Gulf, 263,000 sought VA (Veterans Administration) medical care and 185,780 filed
claims. Of the 171,878 claims processed, 149,094 were approved. Already, more
than 9,600 Gulf War veterans have died! Yet nearly all of them were in their
twenties in 1990.
During that war, more than 14,000 chemical-agent detection
devices sounded repeatedly, yet they were all discounted as false alarms.
It is of interest that, of the service personnel who did not
go to the Gulf but still received the anthrax vaccine, 12% developed Gulf War
Syndrome.
It should be mentioned that the highest rate of physical
problems (42%) was experienced by those troops who were in Kuwait or Iraq, for
they were exposed to additional contamination. Here is a summary from a special,
detailed report in a large natural remedies book:
"Pesticide collars and sprays, nerve-gas inhalation, swallowing
anti-nerve gas (PB) tablets, Mycoplasma infection from the nerve gas, anthrax
vaccines, breathing smoke from burning oil wells, and drinking ‘diet’
(‘sugarless’) soft drinks heated above 86