Chapter 1, Article 1, Paragraphs 1 & 2:
"1. To maintain international peace and security, and to that end: to take effective collective measures for the prevention and removal of threats to the peace, and for the suppression of acts of aggression or other breaches of the peace, and to bring about by peaceful means, and in conformity with the principles of justice and international law, adjustment or settlement of international disputes or situations which might lead to a breach of the peace;
2. To develop friendly relations among nations based on respect for the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples, and to take other appropriate measures to strengthen universal peace;"
Chapter 1, Article 2, Paragraph 4:
"All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations."
Chapter 6, Article 33, Paragraphs 1 & 2:
"1. The parties to any dispute, the continuance of which is likely to endanger the maintenance of international peace and security, shall, first of all, seek a solution by negotiation, enquiry, mediation, conciliation, arbitration, judicial settlement, resort to regional agencies or arrangements, or other peaceful means of their own choice.
2. The Security Council shall, when it deems necessary, call upon the parties to settle their dispute by such means."
Article 1
"The Parties undertake, as set forth in the Charter of the United Nations, to settle any international dispute in which they may be involved by peaceful means in such a manner that international peace and security and justice are not endangered, and to refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force in any manner inconsistent with the purposes of the United Nations."
"Principle Vl
The crimes hereinafter set out are punishable as crimes under; international law:
a. Crimes against peace:
i. Planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances;
ii.Participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the acts mentioned under (I)."
"To initiate a war of aggression, therefore, is not only an international crime; it is the supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole."
-- Robert H. Jackson at the Nuremberg Tribunal, quoted in Curtis Doebbler, "A Farce of Law: The Trial of Saddam Hussein", Jurist: Legal News & Research, http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/forumy/2006/04/farce-of-law-tria l-of-saddam-hussein.php, (24 April 2006).
Lloyd George said he did not believe any statesman or ruler caused war. It may be a century before the world will know the full truth.
(Senator Copeland, Congressional Record)
The Kaiser had to consult Rothschild to find out if he could declare war. Another Rothschild carried the whole burden of the conflict which overthrew Napoleon.
(The New York Times, July 22, 1924)
In the Imperial Archives in Berlin was found a letter from Rothschild to Wilhelm II, urging war.
(Truth About The Jews, Walter Hurt, page 324)
"The fight against Germany has now been waged for months by every Jewish community, on every conference, in all labor unions and by every single Jew in the world.
There are reasons for the assumption that our share in this fight is of general importance. We shall start a spiritual and material war of the whole world against Germany. Germany is striving to become once again a great nation, and to recover her lost territories as well as her colonies. but our Jewish interests call for the complete destruction of Germany..."
(Vladimir Jabotinsky, Mascha Rjetsch, January 1934)
"The millions of Jews who live in America, England and France, North and South Africa, and, not to forget those in Palestine, are determined to bring the war of annihilation against Germany to its final end."
(The Jewish newspaper, Central Blad Voor Israeliten in Nederland, September 13, 1939)
"His (God's) intention will be realized through bloody struggles, wars and revolutions; the present social order will be destroyed together with all institutions that are bound up with the present social order. State capitalism and fascism will take the place of the present social order."
(A Program for the Jews and Humanity, Harry Waton, p. 225).
"The responsibility for the last World War [WW I] rests solely upon the shoulders of the international financiers.
It is upon them that rests the blood of millions of dead and millions of dying."
(Congressional Record, 67th Congress, 4th Session, Senate Document No. 346)
"I probably had more power during the war than any other man in the war; doubtless that is true."
(The International Jew, Commissioned by Henry Ford, speaking of the Jew Benard Baruch, a quasiofficial dictator during WW I).
"In death as in life, I defy the Jews who caused this last war [WW II], and I defy the powers of darkness which they represent.
I am proud to die for my ideals, and I am sorry for the sons of Britain who have died without knowing why."
(William Joyce's [Lord Ha Ha] last words just before Britain executed him for anti war activism in WW II).
"All Jews world wide - declared war on the Third Reich."
(The London Daily Express, Front Page Story, 3/24/1933).
"Germany must be turned into a waste land, as happened there during the 30 year War."
(Das Morgenthau-Tagebuch, The Morgenthau Dairy, p. 11).
"Israel won the war [WW I]; we made it; we thrived on it; we profited from it. It was our supreme revenge on Christianity."
(The Jewish Ambassador from Austria to London, Count Mensdorf, 1918).
"In [preWW II] Berlin, for example, when the Nazis came to power, 50.2% of the lawyers were Jews... 48% of the doctors were Jews.
The Jews owned the largest and most important Berlin newspapers, and made great inroads on the educational system."
(The House That Hitler Built, by Stephen Roberts, 1937).
"Step by step, I have arrived at the conviction that the aims of Communism in Europe are sinister and fatal. At the Nuremberg Trials, I, together with my Russian colleague, condemned Nazi Aggression and Terror. I believe now that Hitler and the German People did not want war. But we, {England}, declared war on Germany, intent on destroying it, in accordance with our principle of Balance of Power, and we were encouraged by the 'Americans' {Jews} around Roosevelt. We ignored Hitler's pleading, not to enter into war. Now we are forced to realize that Hitler was right. He offered us the co-operation of Germany: instead, since 1945, we have been facing the immense power of the Soviet Empire. I feel ashamed and humiliated to see that the aims we accused Hitler of, are being relentless pursued now, only under a different label." (Ashamed and Humiliated The British Attorney General, Sir Hartle Shawcross, said in a speech at Stourbridge, March 16/84 (AP)).
"You {non-Jews} resent us {Jews}, but you cannot clearly say why... Not so many years ago I used to hear that we were money-grubbers and commercial materialists; now the complaint is being whispered around that no art and no profession is safe from Jewish invasion...
"We shirk our patriotic duty in war time because we are pacifists by nature and tradition, and WE ARE THE ARCH-PLOTTERS OF UNIVERSAL WARS AND THE CHIEF BENEFICIARIES OF THOSE WARS. We are at once the founders and leading adherents of capitalism and the chief perpetrators of the rebellion against capitalism. Surely, history has nothing like us for versatility!...
"You accuse us of stirring up revolution in Moscow. Suppose we admit the charge. What of it?... You make much noise and fury about undue Jewish influence in your theaters and movie palaces. Very good; granted your complaint is well founded. But WHAT IS THAT COMPARED TO OUR STAGGERING INFLUENCE IN YOUR CHURCHES, SCHOOLS, YOUR LAWS AND YOUR GOVERNMENT, AND THE VERY THOUGHTS YOU THINK EVERY DAY?
...'The Protocols of the Elders of Zion' which shows that we plotted to bring on the late World War. You believe that book. All right... we will underwrite every word of it. It is genuine and authentic. But what is that besides the unquestionable historical conspiracy which we have carried out, which we never have denied because you never had the courage to charge us with it, and of which the full record is extant for anybody to read?
"If you really are serious when you talk of Jewish plots, may I not direct your attention to one worth talking about? What use is it wasting words on the alleged control of your public opinion by Jewish financiers, newspaper owners, and movie magnates, when you might as well also justly accuse us of the proved control of your whole civilization...
"You have not begun to appreciate the real depth of our guilt. WE ARE INTRUDERS. WEARE SUBVERTERS. We have taken your natural world, your ideals, your destiny, and have played havoc with them.
"WE {Jews} HAVE BEEN AT THE BOTTOM OF NOT MERELY OF THE LATEST WAR {WWI} BUT OF NEARLY ALL YOUR WARS, NOT ONLY OF THE RUSSIAN BUT OF EVERY OTHER MAJOR REVOLUTION IN YOUR HISTORY.
"We have brought discord and confusion and frustration into your personal and public life. WE ARE STILL DOING IT. No one can tell how long we shall go on doing it... Who knows what great and glorious destiny might have been yours if we had left you alone.
"But we did not leave you alone. We took you in hand and pulled down the beautiful and generous structure you had reared, and changed the whole course of your history. WE CONQUERED YOU as no empire of yours ever subjugated Africa or Asia. And we did it solely by the irresistible might of our spirit, with ideas, with propaganda...
"Take the three principal revolutions in modern times, the French, the American and Russian. What are they but the triumph of the Jewish idea of social, political and economic justice? And the end is still a long way off. WE STILL DOMINATE YOU...
"Is it any wonder you resent us? We have put a clog upon your progress. We have imposed upon you an alien book {Scofield Bible} and alien faith {Judeo-Christianity, a false Christianity} which is at cross-purposes with your native spirit, which keeps you everlastingly ill-at-ease, and which you lack the spirit either to reject or to accept in full...
"We have merely divided your soul, confused your impulses, paralyzed your desires...
"So why should you not resent us? If we were in your place we should probably dislike you more cordially than you do us. But we should make no bones about telling you why... You Christians worry and complain about the Jew's influence in your civilization. We are, you say, an international people, a compact minority in your midst, with traditions, interests, aspirations and objectives distinct from your own. And you declare that this state of affairs is a measure of your orderly development; it muddles your destiny. I do not altogether see the danger. Your world has always been ruled by minorities; and it seems to me a matter of indifference what remote origin and professed creed of the governing clique is. THE INFLUENCE, on the other hand, IS certainly THERE, and IT IS VASTLY GREATER AND MORE INSIDIOUS THAN YOU APPEAR TO REALIZE...
"That is what puzzles and amuses and sometimes exasperates us about your game of Jew-baiting. It sounds so portentous. You go about whispering terrifyingly of the hand of the Jew in this and that and the other thing. It makes us quake. WE ARE CONSCIOUS OF THE INJURY WE DID WHEN WE IMPOSED UPON YOU OUR ALIEN FAITH AND TRADITIONS. And then you specify and talk vaguely of Jewish financiers and Jewish motion picture promoters, and our terror dissolves in laughter. The Gentiles, we see with relief, WILL NEVER KNOW THE REAL BLACKNESS OF OUR CRIMES...
"You call us subversive, agitators, revolution mongers. IT IS THE TRUTH, and I cower at your discovery... We undoubtedly had a sizable finger in the Lutheran Rebellion, and IT IS simply A FACT THAT WE WERE THE PRIME MOVERS IN THE BOURGEOIS DEMOCRATIC REVOLUTIONS OF THE CENTURY BEFORE LAST, BOTH IN FRANCE AND AMERICA. If we were not, we did not know our own interests. The Republican revolutions of the 18th Century freed us of our age-long political and social disabilities. They benefited us... You go on rattling of Jewish conspiracies and cite as instances the Great War and the Russian Revolution! Can you wonder that we Jews have always taken your anti-Semites rather lightly, as long as they did not resort to violence?"
(Marcus Eli Ravage (Big Destruction Hammer of God), member of the staff of the New York Tribune, "A Real Case Against the Jews," in Century Magazine, January-February, 1928).
"When you go to war, do not go as the first, so that you may return as the first. Five things has Kannan recommended to his sons:
"Love each other; love the robbery; hate your masters; and never tell the truth"
-- (Pesachim F. 113-B)
"It has been estimated that of the world Jew population of approximately fifteen millions, no fewer than five million are in the United States. Twenty-five percent of the inhabitants of New York are Jews.
During the Great War we bought off this huge American Jewish public by the promise of the Jewish National Home in Palestine, held by Ludendorff to be the master stroke of Allied propaganda as it enabled us not only to appeal to Jews in America but to Jews in Germany as well."
(Propaganda in the Next War, Sidney Robertson, p. 147; War! War! War!, Cincinnatus, p. 192).
"Meanwhile our Christian? Government unites with the British-Jewish Empire, in a plot to starve not merely German women and children (that has had our active support since the war started), but also the women and children of France, Belgium, Holland, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Austria, Hungary, Italy; in fact, all of Europe except Britain until, by provoked revolution, it is hoped general chaos will come.
Germany will be destroyed, and the British- Jewish Empire once more put in control of Europe.
The starvation of men, women and children has been the most approved English method of warfare since the Jews became dominant there - Ireland, China, India, the Boers, Germany, Austria, Hungary, Italy and now France, Holland, Belgium, Norway and Spain. England and the Jews, with our help, in the name of civilization and Christianity, have illegally made food contraband against friendly peaceable nations and call it economic warfare - viz: Jewish warfare - the Four Horsemen."
(War! War! War!, Cincinnatus, p. 242).
"Under the pressure of international finance the atmosphere in Europe became very congested. Instead of using the huge money resources for cultural purposes, the international banking houses urged unlimited armaments of European States, and sometime deliberately precipitated military adventures.
In this connection it is of interest to recall a statement of Israel Zangwill, the well-known Zionist leader, to the effect that it was Mr. Jacob Schiff who financed 'the Japanese War against Russia,'
(See Israel Zangwill's "The Problems of the Jewish Race," p. 14, The Judaic Publishing Company, New York),
as well as another statement, that of Mr. George Kennan, revealing the fact that it was the same banker who financed the revolution among Russian war prisoners in Japan (Compare the report on a Socialist meeting held in Carnegie Hall on March 23, 1917, to celebrate the Russian Revolution, as recorded in the New York Times, March 24, 1917).
Immense munition plants, such as Krupp and Szkoda, Poutiloff, and Manfred Weiss, Deutsch & Son, and Schneider, were all controlled directly or indirectly by high finance, forming part of the interlocking system.
Nor should it be forgotten that the same group of cosmopolitan bankers invariably have given their support to varioius enterprises which helped the Central Powers to further their imperialistic plans.
Thus, soon after the annexation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, when the Dual Monarchy began her war preparations against Italy, it was this bankers' group which loaned 300 million kronen for the expansion of the Austrian navy, with the result that the new battleships were christened by one part of the European press as "Rothschild dreadnaughts."
(The World at the Cross Roads, Boris Brasol, pp. 11- 12).
"Only now, after the terrible events ... it has become possible to appreciate fully the accuracy of the information presented in the secret report of Count Lamsdorf, former Russian Foreign Minister, to Emperor Nicholas II, dated January 3, 1906, on the international aspect of the first revolutionary outbreak in Russia in 1905.
Some of the passages in this report are so striking that we feel it necessary to quote them in extenso: 'The events which took place in Russia during 1905, and which assumed especially acute forms at the beginning of October last, when after a series of strikes, they brought about an armed revolt in Moscow, and many other towns and localities of the Empire, plainly indicate that the Russian revolutionary movement; apart from its deeper, internal, social-economic and political causes, has also quite a definite international character...
The most decisive indications which warrant this conclusion are given by the circumstances that the Russian revolutionaries are in possession of great quantities of arms which are imported from abroad, and of very considerable financial means, because there can be no doubt that the leaders of the revolution have already spent on our anti-government movement, the organization of all sorts of strikes included, large amounts of money.
Since, however, it must be acknowledged that such support given to the revolutionary movement by sending arms and money from abroak can hardly be ascribed to foreign governments (with very special exceptions, as, for instance, that of Sweden supporting the revolutionary movement in Finland, and of Austria which helped the Poles) one is bound to come to the conclusion that there are foreign capitalists' organizations which are interested in supporting our revultionary movement.
With this conclusion the fact must be confronted that the Russian revolutionary movement has the outspoken character of a movement of the heterogeneous nationalities of Russia which one after another, Armenians and Georgians, Letts and Esths, Finns, Poles and others, arose agaisnt the Imperial Government...
If we add to the above, that, as has been proved beyond any doubt, a very coniserable part among these hererogeneous nationalities is played by Jews, who, individually, as ringleaders in the other organizations, as well as through their own (the Jewish Bund in the Western Provinces), have always come forward as the most bellicose element of the revolution, we may feel entitled to assume that the above-mentioned foreign support of the Russian revolutionary movement comes from Jewish capitalist circles.
In this respect one must not ignore the following concurrences of facts which lead to further conclusions, namely, that the revolutionary movement is not only supported but also to a certain degree directed from abroad.
On one hand, the strike borke out with special violence and spread all over Russia not before and not after October, that is, just at the time when our government tried to realize a considerable foreign loan without the participation of the Rothschilds and just in time for preventing the carrying out of this financial operation;
the panic provoked among the buyers and holders of Russian loans could not fail to give additional advantages to the Jewish bankes and capitalists who openly and knowingly speculated upon the fall of the Russian rates.
..Moeover, certain very significant facts, which were also mentioned in the press, quite confirm the obvious connection of the Russian revolutionary movement with the foreign Jewish organizations.
Thus, for instance, the above-mentioned importation of arms, which according to our agents' information was carried on from the European Continent through England can be duly appreciated if we take into consideratikon that already in June, 1905, a special Antlo-Jewish committee of capitalists was openly established in England for the purpose of collecitn money for arming fighting groups of Russian Jews, and that the well-known anti-Russian publicist, Lucien Wolf, was the leading member of this committee.
On the other hand, in view of the fact that the sad consequences of the revolutionary propaganda affected the Jews themselves, another committee of Jewish capitalists was formed in England, under the ldeadership of Lord Rothschild, which collected considrable amounts of contributions in England, France and Germany for the officially alleged purpose of helping Russian Jews who suffered from pogroms.
And lastly, the Jews in America, without thinking it necessary formally to distinguish between the two purposes, collect money for helping the pogrom sufferers and for arming the Jewish youth.'"
(The World At The Cross Roads, Boris Brasol, pp. 73-76).
"Regarding a timeline ... we decided that the end of 2007 will be the point of assessing the effectiveness of the sanctions and the amount of influence they are having on the Iranians.
[***] I never said there is no military option, and the military option is included in all the options that are on the table, but at this time it's right to use the path of sanctions, and to intensify them."
-- Transportation Minister of Israel Shaul Mofaz as quoted by "News Agencies", "Mofaz: All options, including military one, on the table regarding Iran", HAARETZ.com , http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/868786.html, (9 June 2007).
"I think we've got to be prepared to take aggressive military action against the Iranians to stop them from killing Americans in Iraq. And to me, that would include a strike into, over the border into Iran, where we have good evidence that they have a base at which they are training these people coming back into Iraq to kill our soldiers.
[***] If they don't play by the rules, we've got to use our force, and to me that would include taking military action to stop them from doing what they're doing."
-- United States Senator Joseph Lieberman, in an interview with Bob Schieffer on Face the Nation on 10 June 2007, "Lieberman: Bomb Iran If It Doesn't Stop", http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/06/10/ftn/main2908476.s html.
"It's been conclusively proven Iran is not going to be talked out of its nuclear programme. So to stop them from doing it, we have to massively increase the pressure.
"If we can't get enough other countries to come along with us to do that, then we've got to go with regime change by bolstering opposition groups and the like, because that's the circumstance most likely for an Iranian government to decide that it's safer not to pursue nuclear weapons than to continue to do so.
"And if all else fails, if the choice is between a nuclear-capable Iran and the use of force, then I think we need to look at the use of force.
[***] If the choice is them continuing [towards a nuclear bomb] or the use of force, I think you're at a Hitler marching into the Rhineland point. If you don't stop it then, the future is in his hands, not in your hands, just as the future decisions on their nuclear programme would be in Iran's hands, not ours."
-- Former United States Ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton, as quoted by Toby Harnden, "We must attack Iran before it gets the bomb", Telegraph.co.uk, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/05/16/wbolton16.xml, (17 May 2007).
"With two carrier strike groups in the Gulf, we're sending clear messages to friends and adversaries alike. We'll keep the sea lanes open. [...] We'll stand with others to prevent Iran from gaining nuclear weapons and dominating this region[.]"
-- United States Vice President Dick Cheney, as quoted by Graham Bowley, "On Carrier in Gulf, Cheney Issues Warning to Iran", The New York Times www.nytimes.com, http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/11/world/middleeast/11cnd-ch eney.html?hp, (11 May 2007); and
Tom Raum, "Cheney Warns Iran Sea Lanes Must Be Open", The Associated Press, www.washingtonpost.com, http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/11/AR2007051100572.html, (11 May 2007).
"The American president will not abandon the military option and I believe that we do not want him to do so[.]"
-- United States Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, as quoted by Reuters News Agency, "Bush won't give up military option on Iran: Rice", www.reuters.com, http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSL086231320070508, (8 May 2007).
"Iran is a state sponsor of terrorism. We all know that. Iran continues their efforts to build nuclear weapons.
"Iran is now exporting lethal IED's and jihadists and suicide bombers into Iraq killing American soldiers. The Iranians encouraged Hezbullah to attack Israel from Lebanon recently. Iran poses one of the greatest threats to the world, to the security of the world, and in the Middle East.
"I believe the Iranians have got, we have got to bring greater pressures, diplomatic, economic, political, join with our European allies. We still fear greatly the effect of a cut off of oil on, from, into Europe. We have to work together.
"If the Russians and the Chinese are not helpful to us, then we had better figure out a way to put additional pressures encouraging democracy and freedom within Iraq, which is a very cultured socie... within Iran, which is a very cultured society.
"At the end of the day, we cannot allow Iran to acquire nuclear weapons. [...] My greatest fear is the Iranians acquire a nuclear weapon, and give it to a terrorist organization, and there is a real threat of them doing that.
"The trip wire [for a U. S. strike at Iran] is, that if they acquire these weapons, and their, our intelligence tells us, that this is a real threat to the state of Israel, to other states in the region. But I want to emphasize, Chris, there's lots of additional efforts that can be made and must be made before we consider that option. There's lots of things we can do. That is the ultimately final option and I don't think we need to exercise it at this time."
-- U. S. Senator and Presidential candidate John McCain, Republican Presidential Candidate Debates, http://video.msn.com/v/us/msnbc.htm?f=00&g=&p=hotvideo_m_debate_rep&t=c3684&rf=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18296908/&fg=
"It really depends on what our intelligence says. I mean the reality is the use of military force against Iran would be very dangerous. It would be very provocative. The only thing worse would be Iran being a nuclear power."
-- U. S. Presidential candidate Rudy Giuliani, Republican Presidential Candidate Debates, http://video.msn.com/v/us/msnbc.htm?f=00&g=&p=hotvideo_m_debate_rep&t=c3684&rf=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18296908/&fg=
"Right now Iran is moving equipment into Iraq that is being used to kill Americans. Iran has crossed the line.
The United States has absolute license at this point to take whatever actions are necessary to stop those deadly instruments from being moved across the line being used in explosives, roadside bombs inside Iraq. And, lastly, you know we should not get to the edge of the cliff on this enrichment of uranium and plutonium to be used for a nuclear weapon in Iran. The United States needs to move very quickly."
-- U. S. Congressman and Presidential candidate Duncan Hunter, Republican Presidential Candidate Debates, http://video.msn.com/v/us/msnbc.htm?f=00&g=&p=hotvideo_m_debate_rep&t=c3684&rf=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18296908/&fg=
"If we do have to take offensive military action against Iran, it would be far better if the rest of the world saw it as a position of last resort, not first resort, because the effect and consequences will be global."
-- United States Senator, and Presidential Candidate, Hillary Rodham Clinton, as quoted by Hilary Leila Krieger, "Clinton: US might have to confront Iran", The Jerusalem Post, www.jpost.com, http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1177514487245&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull, (26 April 2007).
"If it were not for the strong support of the Jewish community for this war with Iraq, we would not be doing this[.] The leaders of the Jewish community are influential enough that they could change the direction of where this is going, and I think they should."
-- Congressman Jim Moran, as quoted by Ted Barrett, "Lawmaker under fire for saying Jews support Iraq war: Moran apologizes; White House blasts comments", www.CNN.com, http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/03/11/moran.jews/, (12 March 2003).
"Officials said Speaker Nancy Pelosi and other members of the leadership had decided to strip from a major military spending bill a requirement for Bush to gain approval from Congress before moving against Iran.
"Conservative Democrats as well as lawmakers concerned about the possible impact on Israel had argued for the change in strategy."
-- David Espo and Matthew Lee, Associated Press Writers, "Dems abandon war authority provision", Associated Press, YAHOO! NEWS http://news.yahoo.com, http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070313/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_iraq; _ylt=A0WTcUJqOfZFa8cAkxqs0NUE, (13 March 2007).
"Israeli Knesset member Effie Eitam has a reputation as a hawk, but on the question of Iran and its nuclear program, he believes he speaks for the country's mainstream strategic thinkers. Diplomatic and political manoeuvres to rein in the Islamic state are feckless and doomed to fail, leaving Israel, with or without the co-operation of the United States, no alternative but to use military force to put an end to the nuclear threat, he says. 'Israel is preparing and will definitely take action,' Eitam predicted.
"[***] Eitam told The CJN that Israel may have to act alone against Iran within 'a window' to two to three years, but he suggested Israel would move before Bush leaves Office."
-- Paul Lungen, "Israeli MK predicts attack on Iran", The Canadian Jewish News www.cjnews.com, http://www.cjnews.com/viewarticle.asp?id=11329, (8 March 2007).
"The Israeli Regime while remaining outside the relevant international instruments continues quantitative and qualitative development of its nuclear weapons, without any concern, international pressure or monitoring.
"Those who are pushing Security Council to take punitive measures against the peaceful nuclear program of the Islamic Republic of Iran, continue to hinder any action by the Security Council against Israeli regime to force it to abide by the NPT regime. Doing so, they have given wide latitude to this regime and even encourage it to develop freely the clandestine and prohibited possession of nuclear weapons.
[***] While Iran has been providing the Agency with access to all its nuclear material and facilities pursuant to its NPT Safeguards Agreement and the Agency is able to verify the non-diversion of declared nuclear material in Iran (as reflected in paragraphs 26-27 of the report), few countries have been making daily threat of resort to attack Iranian fully safeguarded peaceful nuclear facilities uttered at their highest levels, in clear violation of Article 2 (4) of the UN Charter.
The Islamic republic of Iran has already documented these unlawful and dangerous threats by sending official letters to the UN Secretary General and the Director General of the IAEA. And while overwhelming majority of the international community has been calling for a peaceful negotiated solution and Iran has announced its readiness for such a solution, the United States and Israel which both have a high record of vertical and horizontal proliferation activities are continuing to make threats against Iran's full-scope safeguarded facilities."
-- Ali Asqar Soltanieh, Permanent Representative to the International Atomic Energy Agency Board of Governors from Iran, in an address to the IAEA Board of Governors on 7 March 2007, "Full Text of Speech Delivered by Iran's Envoy to IAEA", Fars News Agency www.farsnews.com, http://www.farsnews.com/English/newstext.php?nn=8512160500, (7 March 2007).
"I believe that either regime change in Iran or, as a last resort, military action is the only thing that will stop the Iranians from getting nuclear weapons[.]"
-- John Bolton, Former American Envoy to the United Nations, as quoted by Janine Zacharia and Bill Varner, "Bolton Says U.S. Should Seek 'Regime Change' in Iran", Bloomberg.com www.bloomberg.com, http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=a.m.58sr9RqM&refer=home, (1 March 2007).
"It is time for Israel or the US to bomb Iran now. Not next week, next month, or next summer, but now. As quickly and as hard and as painfully as possible. [***] So like it or not, time is of the essence, and there is not a moment to lose. The US or Israel should bomb Iran now, before it proves too late."
-- Michael Freund, "Right on!: Stop the atomic ayatollahs", The Jerusalem Post www.jpost.com, http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1170359851111&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull, (13 February 2007).
"'The only chance to convince Iran to dismantle without using brute force is if you choose a big enough stick and you wave it wildly enough,' Steinitz told The Jerusalem Post.
"The Likud MK added that the goal was to 'wave, in order to not to use it.'
'At this moment, Iran thinks that Israel is weak politically, so it would be better if the United States were to issue the threats,' said Steinitz. 'There is one leader of the world and it is not miniscule Israel. Iran is a global threat they are developing a nuclear project to become not just a regional player but a global Player.'"
-- Sheera Claire Frenkel quoting Knesset Member Yuval Steinitz, "Steinitz: US must stop Iran from arming", The Jerusalem Post www.jpost.com, http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1170359851884&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull, (14 February 2007).
"SPIEGEL: You said recently that Israel might have to stand alone and therefore must be ready to deal unilaterally with the Iran problem.
Lieberman: That is the worst-case scenario. The differences in opinion between Russia and Western Europe, between Europe and the U.S., between the U.S. and the United Nations have destabilized the global political system. We have to take into account that the international community may not do anything and that Israel may have to act alone."
-- "SPIEGEL INTERVIEW WITH AVIGDOR LIEBERMAN" conducted by Christian Neef and Christoph Schult, quoting Avigdor Lieberman, Minister of Strategic Affairs and Deputy Prime Minister of Israel, Der Spiegel, SPIEGEL ONLINE, www.spiegel.de, http://www.spiegel.de/international/spiegel/0,1518,465769,0 0.html, (12 February 2007).
"We must turn to Hillary Clinton and other potential presidential candidates in the Democratic Party so that they publicly support immediate action by Bush against Iran.
We should also approach European countries so that they support American actions in Iran, so that Bush will not be isolated in the international arena again. We must clandestinely cooperate with Saudi Arabia so that it also persuades the US to strike Iran."
-- Brigadier General (Res.) Oded Tira, Former IDF Chief Artillery Officer, "What to do with Iran?", http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3346275,00.html, (30 December 2006).
"'Once you say that Iran is like Nazi Germany and that it is willing to use its nuclear weapons to destroy Israel regardless of the destruction it would bring to their own country, you are really arguing that there is no alternative but for Israel and the United States to attack first,' said M.J. Rosenberg, director of policy analysis for the Israel Policy Forum."
-- James D. Besser, "Leading Hawk Warns Of Hysteria Over Iran: Suggestion that war is only option misguided, JINSA official says", The Jewish Week www.thejewishweek.com, http://www.thejewishweek.com/news/newscontent.php3?artid=13 644, (9 February 2007).
Rudolf Rezso Kasztner (1906-1957)
Rudolf Kasztner was born to Jewish parents in Transylvania, a state of Austria which was transferred to Romania. Kasztner studied and became an attorney, journalist and a leader in the Zionist youth movement "Aviva Barissia" and "Ha-lhud ha-Olam." He moved to Budapest in 1942 and joined a local Palestine Foundation Fund which was a fundraising organization of the World Zionist Organization. He also held the post of Vice chairman of the Hungarian Zionist Federation.
Kasztner was in the top management of the Zionist movement and authorized to negotiate with the German Nazis and make deals with them. He was accepted by Hitler's regime as Zionist leader representing Hungary. Early in WWII, he had open channels to Henrich Himmler (1900-1945). When Adolf Eichmann (1906-1962) traveled to Budapest in March 1944, he met with Rudolf and worked out some deals after Hungary surrendered to Germany during the war.
In the early days of Hitler's government, an arrangement had been worked out between Nazis and Zionists to transfer Jews to Palestine in exchange for payment to the German Government. Only a small number of Jews were allowed to escape. Of the 750,000 Jews in Hungary, 550,000 were sent to their deaths in German extermination camps.
Kasztner did not work alone. Joel Eugen Brand (1906-1964), a Jew from Transylvania started to work with him in 1943 in rescuing Jewish refugees. Brand received an message from Adolf Eichmann to travel to Turkey and convey the message to the Jewish Agency that Hungarian Jews would be spared and released in exchange for military supplies.
A meeting took place with the Jewish agency on June 16, 1944. Brand was arrested by British security forces en route to Palestine and sent to a military detention center in Cairo, Egypt. There he was allowed to meet Moshe Sharrett (1894-1965) the head of the Secret Security Commission of the Jewish Agency and a high official in the Zionist movement.
The British Government refused to accept the German offer and the shipment of Hungarian Jews to the death camps began. However, Kasztner was able to negotiate with Neutral nations, and some trucks and other supplies were given to the Germans that resulted in 1,786 Jews being released into Switzerland. Kasztner's efforts were marginal compared to the 550,000 Hungarian Jews who died in Germany.
Many of the Hungarian Jews were kept no more than three miles from the border with Romania and were only guarded by a small group of German soldiers since Germany was losing a lot of manpower to the losses against the Allied forces.
There were also very strong underground fighters in Hungary which could have overpowered the Germany soldiers. Instead of being warned and helped to flee, Kasztner told the imprisoned Jews that there was no danger and that they should just be patient. The Jews trusted their Zionist leadership and sat like cattle outside a slaughterhouse waiting for their deaths.
Later, after WWII, Rudolf Kasztner was given a government position in Israel as member of the Mapai party. In 1953, he was accused by Malkiel Gruenwald of collaborating with the Nazis and being the direct cause of the deaths of Hungarian Jews. The Israeli government took it very seriously and tried to protect Rudolf Kasztner by ordering the Israeli attorney general to file a criminal lawsuit against Gruenwald!
On June 22, 1955, the judge found that the case against Rudolf Kasztner had merit and so the Israeli cabinet voted to order the attorney general to appeal it to a higher court. A vote of no confidence was introduced in the Israeli Parliament, and when Zionists refused to support the vote, it caused a cabinet crisis.
If the truth of the Holocaust came out, it could bring down the Zionist Movement and threaten the very existence of Israel. Most Jews didn't know that the Zionists worked with the Nazi's. If the public were informed about the truth, they would react with horror and outrage. The Supreme Court would have started its hearings in 1958, but the Zionist movement couldn't take the chance being incriminated if Kasztner testified.
As a result, Kasztner was assassinated on March 3, 1957. On January 17, 1958, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the late Rudolf Kazstner.
The story of Rudolf Kasztner and his collaboration with the Nazi's was reported in a book called "Perfidy" by an American born Jew named Ben Hecht (1894-1964). Ben was a staunch supporter of a Jewish state in Palestine at first but in the end he became a strong anti-Zionist. His book is a well-documented expose of the Zionist movement and how the Zionist Leadership worked with the Nazis in the annihilation of their fellow Jews to create such a hostile climate in Europe that Jews had no other option but to immigrate to Palestine.
In 1977 Rabbi Moshe Schonfeld published a book called "The Holocaust Victims." Schonfeld confirmed the writings of Ben Hecht and wrote that the Zionist leadership was concerned only in the creation of the state of Israel, not with saving Jewish lives. The book had photocopied documents supporting the charges of betrayal against the following three people:
1. Chaim Weizmann (1874-1952), a Zionist Leader and the first President of Israel.
2. Rabbi Stephen Wise (1874-1949), a Hungarian born Jew living in the USA.
3. Yitzhak Grunbaum (1879-1970), a Polish Jew and the chairman of Jewish Agency, a high leader in the Zionistic movement and Minister of Interior of the first Israeli cabinet in 1948
Paul Wallenberg was the Swedish ambassador to Hungary. He arrived shortly after 438,000 Jews were deported from Hungary to their deaths in German extermination camps. He issued Swedish passports to approximately 35,000 Jews and made Adolf Eichmann furious. As the Germans would march Jews in what was known as death marches, Wallenburg and his staff would go to train stations and hand out passports to rescue the Jews from being taken.
This upset Rudolf Kasztner and his Zionist teams because the goal of the Swedish team was to transport as many Jews as possible to Sweden as soon as the war was over. This was contrary to the goals of the Zionist leadership who were implementing Herzl's plan.
Any surviving Jews were to be taken to Palestine, not Sweden. Wallenburg succeeded in bringing out more Jews than Rudolf Kazstner ever did. When the Soviet army invaded Hungary in January 1945, Wallenburg was arrested on January 17. He was charged with espionage and murdered.
Paul Wallenburg had exposed the cooperation of the Zionist leadership with the Nazis and this was a secret that could not be let out. Therefore, the Communist/Zionist leadership eliminated a noble man who had given his all to save Jewish men, women and children.
When the debate about the Nazis working with the Zionists would not go away, the Jewish Leadership decided that something must be done to put the issue to rest. If the gentile population found out about the dark shadow over the formation of Israel, it could undermine current and future support for the state of Israel that cannot exist without the billions of dollars it receives in aid every year from the United States.
Edwin Black, an American born Jewish writer and journalist was asked in 1978 to investigate and write a history of the events. With a team of more than 10 Jewish experts, the project took five years. The book was named, "The Transfer Agreement," and it accurately points out a whole list of Jews in the Nazi leadership but the conclusion innocently states that the Zionists who negotiated the transfer agreement could not have anticipated the concentration camps and gas chambers. The book is very well researched but still doesn't tell the history of the Zionist movement and the ideology of Theodor Herzl. Most importantly, it leaves out Herzl's words:
"If whole branches of Jews must be destroyed, it is worth it, as long as a Jewish state in Palestine is created." -- Theodor Herzl
Edwin Black's book is a great documentation, but it is sad that he and the Jewish Leadership are not willing to face the facts that the Zionist Leadership was the cause of the Holocaust.
It is even more sad to think that the Jewish people suffered tremendously during the Nazi regime caused by their own leadership. They were sacrificed for the cause of establishing a "kingdom" on earth, which has no place for the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. (Matthew 23:13-15).
Some day in the future the Jewish people will understand that their Messiah, which their ancestors rejected, was the Son of God. (Zechariah 12:10-14)
In 1964 a book by Dietrich Bronder (German Jew) was published in Germany called, "Before Hitler came." The book tried to come to grips with why the German Jews turned on their own people and caused so much destruction of innocent people.
The answer given in the book states that the driving force behind the Jewish Nazis, was the old dream to have a Messiah who could establish a world rule with the Jews in power. The same ideology as can be seen in John 6:14-15.
Original: Showdown in Jerusalem
http://www.eaec.org/newsletters/2008/vol_8/showdown-in-jerusalem-digest.htm