14. How many gas chambers to kill people were there at Auschwitz?

Ernst Zündel

replies to Q/A # 14:

Nizkor begins by standing the argument on its head. Nizkor writes:
"Wrong, as usual; no evidence, as usual. . ."

Let's call a pause here and focus in on this matter of evidence. Revisionists
are UNDER NO OBLIGATION to produce any evidence whatsoever. If you call
somebody a thief, or a drug pusher, or a murderer, it is YOU who must bring
proof. Anybody can make accusations. Accusations must be backed by facts that
can be verified.

It is the Holocaust Hucksters, with their obstinate
promotion of this outlandish propaganda claim that there were homicidal
gassings in places like Auschwitz who are under strict obligation to produce
the evidence in support of their fantastic yarns.

Höss utterly terrified of British interrigators

who obtained a "confession" out of him

Click
here for full story of this picture

The fact is that, even 50 years after the alleged events, the Holocaust
Hucksters have consistently and miserably failed to provide even minimal
evidence in support of what they are claiming. This, despite the virtually
limitless resources at their disposal. All they have is so-called "victim
testimonials" and the "Hoess
Confession" tortured out of a defenseless man.

And now, as the structure of lies and deceit is crumbling right around their
ankles, instead of truth and logic, they fall back on brutally punitive,
coercive laws to sustain their discredited and unsupported atrocity propaganda
(e.g., I have in mind the recent disgraceful event in Germany, mentioned below,
where a scientist gets sentenced to prison for writing an impeccable forensic
report refuting the Holocaust Hoax, or the sleazy recent tactic of knocking out
CODOH - the Committee for Open Debate on the
Holocaust - from the Internet, without rhyme, reason, or warning).

The challenges and questions, put to the Holocaust Hucksters by Revisionists
and others, stand unaddressed. Their latest "star" performer,
Pressac, financed by the aggressively hucksterish Klarsfeld Foundation, fell
flat on his face in providing answers and is now being quietly sidelined, as
one can observe from Nizkor's text: they prefer to recommend as reference for
their pretensions a source more aligned to the Politburo Party Line.

This is really getting tiresome.

Since the Zündel
Trial in 1988 the world has been informed - and, by this time, many
millions already know! - that there exists not one small shred of forensic
evidence that there were ever any homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz - except
disinfestation chambers to exterminate vermin.

The plain truth is that the Allies manufactured the "gas chamber"
story as atrocity propaganda to "stoke up" their own people against
the "Nazis" and to distract their people from their own war crimes -
such as the terror bombing of civilians and the mass rapes, robberies and
brutalities of the Red Army.

There have now been four independent forensic and scientific
investigations of Auschwitz's so-called "gas chambers" since 1988.
Here is what needs to sink into the hardest skull of the most obsessive
Holocaust Huckster: There were no "gas chambers" for killing
people at Auschwitz or anywhere else in Germany! The Holocaust Promotion Lobby
has no scientific evidence whatsoever for the existence of such homicidal
"gas chambers" - only "witness testimony" and propaganda
claims!

Four experts have now looked into this thoroughly and left us their
reports:

The
Leuchter Report - Fred A. Leuchter, Jr. was, and is, an expert
specializing in gas chambers and executions and was so certified by a
Toronto Court during the Second Zündel Trial. He was described by
Missouri State Penitentiary Warden Bill M. Armontrout as "well versed
in all areas and. . . the only consultant in the United States [in gas
chambers] that I know of."

Leuchter
examined the alleged gas chambers at Auschwitz, Birkenau and Majdanek in
1988 and of Dachau,
Hartheim and Mauthausen in 1989, and took samples from the walls and
floors for forensic testing for cyanide residue to be done in the United
States. He concluded that the rooms were not and could not have been used
as homicidal gas chambers based on their construction and the fact that
either no or only extremely small traces of cyanide residue were found in
the brick and mortar samples of these alleged "killing sites".

In contrast, a room where
Zyklon B - the alleged killing gas - was used for disinfection purposes by
the Germans, the brick and mortar had 1000 times more (!) cyanide residue
in the samples than the alleged "gas chambers" which supposedly
were used to kill millions around the clock. [Click
here to see chart]

Leuchter
did not conduct these laboratory tests. Professor Dr. James Roth, a
ten-year veteran of Princeton and a court-approved expert, analyzed and
tested the rock soil and wall scrapings from the alleged gas chambers of
Auschwitz at the prestigious Alpha Labs in the USA and testified to the
negative results in 1988 under oath in Toronto. The entire record can be
found in the chapter titled "James Roth"
in "Did
Six Million Really Die", by attorney Barbara Kulaszka - court
records cited many times before. His testimony, and that of Fred
Leuchter in a chapter by that name, is well worth re-reading. "Did Six
Million Really Die? Report of the Evidence in the Canadian "False
News" Trial of Ernst Zündel - 1988."

The Krakow Institute
Report - Alarmed by the Leuchter Report, the Auschwitz State Museum
itself commissioned in 1990 the Krakow Forensic Institute to carry out an
investigation of the alleged gassing sites. The Krakow Report fully
corroborated the cyanide readings found by Leuchter, although it
interpreting the results differently.

The Auschwitz Museum
maintains, not too surprisingly, that Poland's acid rain had eliminated
the cyanide. This flies in the face of the scientific fact that the
"Prussian blue", the compound formed by cyanide and iron in the
bricks and mortar, is one of the most stable and enduring compounds
(discoloratation is perhaps a better word) known to man. The late Dr.
William Lindsey, Chief Research Chemist for Dupont of America stated that
this combination of Zyklon B with iron could last thousands of years in
rain, sleet and open air. This telling blue stain is clearly seen today in
disinfection chambers, but not in the so-called "gas chambers"
at Auschwitz.

We are now asked by the
Holocaust Hucksters to believe that the rain selectively washed out the
evidence of the so-called "gas chambers" but left the evidence
where vermin had been killed. Believable? So is the Easter Bunny.

The Lüftl Report -
Walter Lüftl is a professional engineer with a large engineering firm
in Vienna. He is a former president of the Austrian Association of
Engineers.

Over a period of 25 years,
Lüftl was regularly called in court cases as an expert witness
involving engineering and construction matters. In 1992 Lüftl wrote a
report calling the alleged extermination of millions of Jews in gas
chambers during WWII "technically impossible."

Lüftl also pointed out
that the design and numbers of the crematories showed that they were
incapable of handling the number of "gassed" victims routinely
alleged by the Holocaust Lobby. "Corpses are not flammable
material," wrote Lüftl. "to cremate them requires much time
and energy. . . " none of which the Germans had in limitless
abundance.

Lüftl was criminally
charged in Austria - where "Holocaut Denial" is a criminal
offense - for writing this report "denying the Holocaust." but
all charges against him were quietly dropped.

The Rudolf
Report - Germar Rudolf, a diplom chemist in Germany trained at the
Max Planck Institute, a famous German facility, investigated the sites of
the alleged homicidal gas chambers of Auschwitz and took samples for the
purpose of determining cyanide levels. Rudolf's report concluded, like
Leuchter's, that the alleged gas chambers could never have been used for
the claimed mass gassings on an industrial scale. Tests on samples showed
no or minimal traces of cyanide.

Germar Rudolf is a special
case and illustrates that when it comes to the so-called "gas
chambers" of places such as Auschwitz, society no longer deals in
rationality and reason. Here is a young, profoundly apolitical young man
with a new family and no links whatsoever to any political, much less
"extremist" group - like "Holocaust Deniers." He wrote
a treatise on his findings that is impeccable. He submitted his report to
more than 300 experts for their critique before he published it.

Not one of them found even
the smallest error!

Germar Rudolf was criminally
charged under Germany's repressive "Holocaust-is-a-dogma" law.
Just a few weeks ago, Germar Rudolf has been sentenced to a prison term of
18 months for his scientific finding. The book he wrote has been banned in
Germany, and many people connected to its publication have been punished
with jail terms and/or fines. The report has been ordered to be destroyed.

This brilliant scientist,
with a young, pregnant wife and a baby already born, has been evicted
twice from his apartment for his "sin." He is now in political
exile - his career ruined and his life in shreds.

It is a monumental sham! It's
Shoah business at its sleaziest. The so-called "Holocaust" has
now degenerated into a voodoo-like Holocaust Promotion Cult with its
operators doing their desperate best, by hook or by crook, to avoid being
exposed to the light of day. (Lesser, but none-theless perfect examples
are the recent website cancellations such as CODOH International, based in the United
States, The Adelaide Institute in Australia, and The Freedom-Site in Canada.)

Cannot intelligent people
settle this matter once and for all? Why doesn't the scientific community
- world-wide! - get together and appoint a Grand Jury type investigation?
We are not living in the Middle Ages any more where Galileo Galilei must
recant his "heresies" - or else!

In March of 1993, I wrote:

"We have to start a
letter writing campaign to . . . international bodies to put pressure on
the German government to stop persecuting and harassing people just
because they have a different viewpoint on history when it concerns the
Holocaust.

We also have to ask that
the UN Human Rights Organizations force Germany to allow civilized trials,
where experts can be heard - experts like Leuchter,
Faurisson, and Irving - and not just
some Kangaroo Court proceedings in which the accused basically gets called
to the bar to be convicted, and has no chance to present his viewpoints
buttressed by expert witnesses and documents.

In my own case in Munich,
Fred Leuchter, the gas chamber expert, was not allowed to testify because
he was considered "not qualified" . . . Dr. Faurisson was not
allowed to testify - "not qualified". I had asked Germar Rudolf,
a qualified, university trained Diplom Chemist to testify - he too was
disqualified.

Not a single witness was
allowed to testify in my defense, to make clear my reasons for saying that
no six million people were gassed in places like Auschwitz, Birkenau and
Majdanek.

This situation must be
changed. I believe that if all of us work together, we can make the
necessary changes inside the courts and in the media in Germany.

We are the new 'Freedom
Fighters'! Our weapons are our pens, typewriters, computers, or just our
telephones, fax machines and telegrams. Thousands of letters should flood
their offices. We must act, not just talk."

Will Nizkor act - not just
talk? Will Nizkor stop confabulating by simply relabeling morgues into
"gas chambers" and crematories into killing centers and get to
the crux of the matter?

I challenge the world to appoint a Blue Ribbon Commission to investigate
this hoax once and for all. Revisionists have nothing to fear.