Subject: Konrad Morgen
From: <Saved by Windows Internet Explorer 8>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 23:42:31 +0800

Konrad
Morgen

A wrench in the works of
the Holocaust Myth. (1)

I
used to have all 4 hours of my video "One Third of the Holocaust" at
Youtube.com, but then holocaust denial censorship finally kicked in and
all episodes were removed.(2)
Even episodes with titles as milk toast as "Reader's Digest" (where I look
at a 1943 issue of the publication) were deleted. It's interesting to note
that videos which claim 9-11 was an inside job orchestrated by George W.
Bush, and that Bush deliberately killed thousands in the World Trade
Center in order to gain power, those videos are not deleted.(3)
They're not a youtube problem. I don't believe that theory but what a
contrast: You can call the current president of the United States a mass
killer of his own people and express that on youtube, but make a video
stating that jews did not die in gas chambers in East Europe 60 years ago;
that's a problem. Strange isn't it?

But before my videos
got deleted, I noticed a recurring response from the youtube community:
How could I be denying the holocaust when millions of people saw it
happen? Were they hallucinating? Here's the answer: Holocaust believers
and holocaust deniers have something in common: they both believe Jews
were sent to camps. But deniers believe those camps were not death camps.
They were labor camps. Germany was kicking Jews out of Europe and
temporarily putting them into camps in the East.(4)
Thus the photos of Jews waiting at train stations; the photos of Jews
inside trains, those are real. They fit with what deniers
believe.

So the issue is not about Jews leaving on trains; it's
about what happened in the camps, and that hinges on what was seen and
known by camp staff and by inmates. But because the alleged death part of
the camps were secret, not every inmate or guard saw it. We thus don't
have tens of thousands of witnesses as so many people think. We are
narrowing it down to a select group of camp staff and inmates forced to
work in the alleged killing section of a camp. The alleged victims can't
be witnesses because they're dead. So the number of first-hand witnesses
to the holocaust, if I had to make a rough guess, is about 100 inmates and
200 camp staff. And that's confirmed by the holocaust research literature
where the sources of various scholars are a fairly small group of people.
It's not a situation of picking a witness randomly out of a hat because
there's so many to choose from.(5)

But
if members of the camp staff were close enough to see something, then they
were also close enough to be accused of being involved. Conversely, those
200 or so camp personnel would be the only ones in the world to know
first-hand that a giant lie was being put upon the German people. Here's
what happened to these camp members: Most were executed or given life
sentences in court cases run by the Americans, British, Polish, and
Soviets. When they fell through the gallows floor, their first-hand
knowledge of the camps died with them.(6)
And the ones sent to prison weren't exactly going to have a forum to
express their views. I couldn't even do that on youtube 60 years later.

There was one German with first-hand knowledge who couldn't be
accused of taking part in the killing: Georg Konrad Morgen. He was an SS
Judge and he himself had sentenced the leaders of concentration camps to
death. He'd imprisoned and charged the Chief of Police at Auschwitz,
Maximillian Grabner, with murder. He'd charged the camp commander of
Buchenwald with murder and then sentenced him to death. Like the lyrics to
the song "Rollercoaster" by the Ohio Players, your response might be, "Say
what!?"

Short bio on Konrad Morgen:
Morgen worked as both
investigator and judge prosecuting officials and guards in the
concentration camps for illegal activities. In the Buchenwald camp, four
people were arrested, including the former camp commander's wife, Ilse
Koch. The main issue was that 3-4 prisoners had been killed some years
earlier.(7)
Morgen sentenced two of them to death. Ilse was acquitted on the charge of
embezzlement, and the charge against her levelled by the inmates of making
items out of human skin was withdrawn due to lack of evidence. Morgen had
interviewed the prisoners at Buchenwald, but couldn't prove their stories
about Ilse making tattooed lamp shades so he withdrew the charge. No one
disputes Morgen's extensive wartime prosecutions. He described them in his
own words at the Nuremberg Trial:

"I investigated about 800 cases, that
is, about 800 documents, and one document would affect several cases.
About 200 were tried during my activity. Five concentration camp
commanders were arrested by me personally. Two were shot after being
tried."(8)

But
his career also had other post-war brownie points: In 1936, he put out a
book called War Propaganda and the Prevention of War which was
against the militarization of Germany. True Morgen was a member of the SS,
but even that couldn't be used against him. At Nuremberg he
explained,

"I was drafted compulsorily into the General SS. In 1933, I
belonged to the Reich Board for Youth Training, whose, students' group was
completely incorporated into the General SS."(9)

What
Morgan did during the war flies in the face of the standard holocaust
story: Morgen sentenced to death the top two officials of a concentration
camp for killing just 3-4 inmates, years earlier.(10)
Not hundreds, not thousands. Yet holocaust survivor stories tend to
describe the average guard as killing that many people every day, with and
without an alcoholic drink in one hand. Contrast with Morgen: he moved to
the Buchenwald area for 8 months, and had to really look, placing his
staff to live in the concentration camp itself. He wasn't investigating
the current camp commander Hermann Pister, but rather the former camp
commander who had left 2 years earlier. After some major sleuthing, Morgen
found some corruption practices but turned up no murder leads. Finally,
near the end of 8 months, and looking at records that were 3-5 years old,
Morgen uncovered a stealthy way in which the camp commander, Karl Koch,
with the help of the camp doctor had killed around 4 inmates, and Koch was
tried and sentenced to death.(11)
That doesn't fit with the holocaust at all does it? In short, Morgen spent
an enormous amount of time in regard to the deaths of a few inmates that
had occurred years before.

The
Plan(12)
The
Allied Psychological Warfare Department (called PWD-SHAEF) came up with a
plan to exploit a rumor which they had heard about. The rumor was that at
Buchenwald, Ilse Koch, the sadistic wife of the camp commander Karl Koch,
would ride out into the prison yard on a horse, have prisoners strip, and
then choose tattoos on their bodies she liked. These prisoners would then
be sent to a place where they would be killed, so that their tattooed skin
could be removed and made into lampshades and other items. Shrunken heads
had got into the rumor too. Some of the American psych warfare officers
now in Europe, such as Albert G. Rosenberg (who was Jewish, born and
raised in Germany) had recently returned from being stationed in the port
city of Natal, Brazil(13)
where they would have seen the psychological power and low-brow public
fascination that shrunken heads carried. There, in an awful example of
capitalism, they would have seen how shrunken heads had become an
exportable little industry. Every region has their tourist items. Here
with Brazilian tourist shops with garrish signs advertising real shrunken
heads. Few were really from Amazon tribes. Demand had far outstripped
supply there. Most were made by unscrupulous people who perhaps knew
someone who worked in a morgue. Psyche warfare wouldn't have needed to
procure the heads in Brazil. They would be available in European Museums
and curio shops to take.

In 1944 an affidavit by a captured German
soldier was produced named Andreas Pfaffenberger, he claimed to be an
ex-Buchenwald inmate, and mentioned that, while there, he had seen 2
shrunken heads in a room.(14)

Here's
how the Psych Warfare plan would be implemented: when the Buchenwald camp
staff evacuated due to the soon-to-arrive American troops, a psyche
warfare officer would get there before the American combat troops and
plant atrocity items like shrunken heads and pieces of tattooed human
skin. That's the kind of thing Psyche Warfare does: it's called "black
propaganda" --making the other side look bad. Demoralize the enemy by
making them feel terrible about themselves. The plan was to publicize the
discovery in order to bolster world condemnation of Germany and to
demoralize the part of the German population who were now occupied. (15)
Nowadays there's an ethical issue called "blowback," meaning it's bad if
the info blows back into the American press. That's what happened in the
mid 1980's with a US disinformation campaign against Moammar Khadaffei.(16)
But further back, during WWII, it wasn't an issue. It was more like a
bonus.

As a kid I remember hearing that McDonalds has worms in
their meat. It's probably just the shape small pieces of beef take when
sent through a grinder. The shape of little worms. But if psych warfare
was an enemy of McDonalds, they could break into a McDonald's and plant
beef patties with real worms. Then they could call a famous media
personality and tell him to eat there, or call the cops or something. But
since psych warfare isn't an enemy of McDonald's, that's not going to
happen. It's documented that in the vacuum after the German camp staff
left, but before the American Army combat troops arrived, Members of
Psyche Warfare were strangely there.(17)
Such as Albert G. Rosenberg, the German Jew turned American Psyche Warfare
Lieutenant. Then shortly after, an American film crew arrived, headed by
Billy Wilder, an Austrian Jew turned American Film Corps officer,(18)
and lo and behold, there on a display table ready to be filmed were dried
pieces of tattooed human skin. Oh, and two shrunken heads. Never mind that
they were South American shrunken heads. (19)

The
Logic of The Psych Warfare Plan: Ilse Koch was killing prisoners and
making items out of their tattooed skin. When the Americans were coming in
April 1945, she hastily left, and morbid objects indicating what she had
done were there for the Americans to find.

The Problem with The
Psych Warfare Plan: If Psych Warfare had known about Konrad Morgen,
they might have done the math. The math is that no one associated with the
rumor of the tattooed skin, shrunken heads, and lampshades had been at
Buchenwald for almost two years. Morgen had arrested four people: Karl
Koch, his wife, the deputy camp commander, and the lead camp doctor, all
in late 1943. In the subsequent trial the charge against Ilse Koch
regarding making items out of skin was withdrawn due to lack of
evidence,
(20) and Ilse was acquitted on the charge of embezzlement, but her
husband was found guilty of murdering 4 inmates. He was sentenced to death
and later executed, as was the deputy. When the Americans arrived, Ilse
Koch hadn't lived at Buchenwald for almost 2 years. And during the Morgen
crackdown, one would think the camp would have been run by the book. The
new commander of Buchenwald, Hermann Pister, was already there in July
1943 when Morgen started his 8 month investigation. Karl Koch had
transferred to be the head of Majdanek in 1941. The new commander, Hermann
Pister, was never charged by the SS nor later the Americans with making
shrunken heads or procurring human skin, so it doesn't make sense that the
Americans would find these items when they arrived almost 2 years later.
Morgen threw a wrench into the works of the Psych Warfare plan, because
they didn't know about him.

But the plan worked anyway, because
when it comes to a psychologically powerful atrocity spectacle, the public
doesn't really think. That could be seen in 1991, when a Hungarian Jew
turned US congressman, Tom Lantos, staged a spectacle: A 15 year-old girl
testified that she had been in a Kuwait hospital room when the Iraqi
soldiers came in and yanked babies off life-support systems so they could
take the incubators back to Iraq. No one noticed that the girl testifying
spoke perfect American English. She had no accent whatsoever. What are the
chances of a 15 year old Arab girl in Kuwait speaking flawless American
English happening to be in the neo-natal intensive care unit when Iraqi
troops barge in? The horrible spectacle she described, her brown skin, and
her Arabic name was enough to fool everybody. (21)

Alleged
holocaust survivor Tom Lantos applied skills in deception to a part of the
globe other than Europe. The phrase "You can fool all of the people some
of the time, or some of the people all of the time, but you can't fool all
of the people all of the time." is a phrase you could display on TV, on
say, CNN, and 100% percent of the people who read it, would feel like they
were on the intelligent side of that equation. But if the phrase is even
true, it's barely, barely true.

At the Nuremberg Trial, American
prosecutor Thomas J. Dodd wants to give the court an idea of what the
camps were like. In front of the courtroom there is a table with something
on it, but no one can see what it is because a sheet covers it. Dodd
mentions the depravity that went on at the concentration camps and offers
an example from Buchenwald. Just then a clerk pulls the sheet off the
table to reveal a shrunken human head. It has a powerful effect,
particularly since next to it, on a bulletin board, are hanging samples of
tattooed human skin. Dodd describes the head and skin by reading from an
affidavit taken from an inmate at Buchenwald named Andreas Pfaffenberger:

"There I also saw the shrunken heads of two young Poles who
had been hanged for having had relations with German girls. The heads were
the size of a fist, and the hair and the marks of the rope were still
there."(22)

Pfaffenberger's
statement also describes the skin. Dodd reads,

" 'No one knew what the purpose was; but after the tattooed
prisoners had been examined, the ones with the best and most artistic
specimens were kept in the dispensary and then killed by injections
administered by Karl Beigs, a criminal prisoner. The corpses were then
turned over to the pathological department where the desired pieces of
tattooed skin were detached from the bodies and treated. The finished
products were turned over to SS Standartenfuehrer Koch's wife, who had
them fashioned into lamp shades and other ornamental household articles, I
myself saw such tattooed skins with various designs and legends on them,
such as "Hansel and Gretel," which one prisoner had on his knee, and
designs of ships from prisoners' chests. This work was done by a prisoner
named WERNERBACH."(23)

But
the next day at the trial, a lawyer for the Germans has an issue about
Dodd's presentation. He complains to the judges
saying,

DR. KAUFFMAN: "May I bring up
two points with regard to yesterday's and in future presentation of
evidence on the section dealing with Crimes against Humanity.

Firstly, I request that the affidavit of the witness
Pfaffenberger, which was submitted yesterday, be stricken from the record.
The witness himself will later have to be cross-examined, since his
affidavit is fragmentary in most important points. In many cases it does
not appear whether his statements are based on personal observations or on
hearsay, and therefore it is too easy to draw false conclusions. The
witness did not mention that the Camp Commander Koch and his inhuman wife
were condemned to death by an SS court, among other things, on account of
these occurrences. It is, of course, possible to ascertain the complete
facts by questioning the witness at a later stage of the Trial. But until
then the Tribunal and all members of the Prosecution and the Defense must
be continually influenced by such dreadful testimony.

The contents
of this testimony are so horrifying and so degrading to the human mind
that one would like to avert one's eyes and ears. In the meantime such
statements make their way into the press of the whole world, and
civilization is justly indignant. The consequences of such prejudiced
statements are incalculable. The Prosecutor clearly recognized the
significance of this testimony and exposed the sorry documents in
yesterday's proceedings. If weeks or months pass before such testimony is
rectified, its initial effect can never be wholly eliminated; but truth
suffers and justice is endangered
thereby."

Another lawyer then chimed in and
stated that maybe the Prosecution knew about wartime Buchenwald
prosecutions, but deliberately concealed that.(24)

Dodd
wasn't in court that day. He'd gone back to the USA, but a month later, on
1/14/46 he responded to the above criticism. He told the judges the
following:

MR. DODD: "I have one other
matter that I should like to take up very briefly before the Tribunal this
morning. It is concerned with a matter that arose after I had left the
courtroom to return to the United States.

On the 13th of December
we offered in evidence Document Number 3421-PS, and Exhibit Numbers
USA-252 and 254. They were, respectively, the Court will recall, sections
of human skin taken from human bodies and preserved; and a human head, the
head of a human being, which had been preserved. On the 14th day of
December, according to the Record, counsel for the Defendant Kaltenbrunner
addressed the Tribunal and complained that the affidavit, which was
offered, of one Pfaffenberger, failed to state that the camp commandant at
Buchenwald, one Koch, along with his wife, was condemned to death for
having committed precisely these atrocities, this business of tanning the
skin and preserving the head. And in the course of the discussion before
the Tribunal the Record reveals that counsel for the Defendant Bormann, in
addressing the Tribunal, stated that it was highly probable that the
Prosecution knew that the German authorities had objected to this camp
commandant Koch and, in fact, knew that he had been tried and sentenced
for doing precisely these things. And there was some intimation, we feel,
that the Prosecution, having this knowledge, withheld it from the
Tribunal. Now, I wish to say that we had no knowledge at all about this
man Koch at the time that we offered the proof; didn't know anything about
him except that he had been the commandant, according to the affidavit.
But, subsequent to this objection we had an investigation made, and we
have found that he was tried in 1944, indeed, by an SS court, but not for
having tanned human skin nor having preserved a human head but for having
embezzled some money, for what - as the judge who tried him tells us - was
a charge of general corruption and for having murdered someone with whom
he had some personal difficulties. Indeed, the judge, a Dr. Morgen, tells
us that he saw the tattooed human skin and he saw a human head in
Commandant Koch's office and that he saw a lampshade there made out of
human skin. But there were no charges at the time that he was tried for
having done these things." (25)

So
Morgen's name enters the court transcript, but as part of a lie Dodd is
telling in order to save the integrity of his presentation. Because Morgen
never saw a head, tattoos and lampshades in his investigation of
Buchenwald. And as mentioned, that charge against Ilse Koch was withdrawn
due to lack of evidence. At that point, around January 1946, the Americans
start looking for Morgen in Germany.(26)
When they find him, they imprison him at Dachau and threaten to turn him
over to the Soviets if he doesn't testify that he saw the tattooed human
skin, lampshades and shrunken heads. He refuses.

But main point of
the above transcript is trying to fathom the poor quality of the
prosecution's presentation. The American Prosecution team has a staff of
140 people and access to other department's investigations. The
prosecution's knowledge of the concentration camps should be first-rate.
Yet they can show a shrunken head but when it comes to a former commander
of the camp Karl Koch, Prosecutor Dodd "didn't know anything about him."
It's more like they're putting on a show, as in show trial. The quality of
the prosecution is even more pathetic when you consider the Pfaffenberger
affidavit. When the Americans arrived at Buchenwald, Pfaffenberger wasn't
even there. He'd been captured far away on the front 5 months before. He
then signed a statement a month later saying he'd been a prisoner at
Buchenwald before being drafted into the army. And the interrogators never
followed up with any clarifying questions.(27)
That's the quality information the judges are hearing at Nuremberg. And
the part of Pfaffenberger's statement not read to the court mentions
seeing an Austrian politician killed before his very eyes. Nevermind that
the politician was not at Buchenwald and the politician survived the war.
(28)
And Pfaffenberger mentions sewage troughs where people were thrown in to
drown. Indeed some camps had troughs, but Buchenwald had toilets connected
to a sewer system. This fraudulent account is being read to the Nuremberg
court by Connecticut's future US senator, Thomas J. Dodd, father of Chris
Dodd, who at the time of this writing (July 2007) is a contender for the
democratic nomination to run for President of the United
States.

Morgen
Testifies at Nuremberg
Konrad Morgen was called by a German defense
lawyer to testify toward the end of the trial. He couldn't be called
before that, because he couldn't be located. The Americans failed to tell
the Defense that they had Morgen imprisoned at Dachau.(29)
As Morgen was finally in the courtroom waiting for his turn to take the
witness stand, he could have looked over at a depressed dejected group of
men: The former leaders of Germany, some of whom were undoubtably taking
private note of the pathetic and dishonest nature of the victors' trial.
These former leaders were watching the birth of Idiocracy. This courtroom
was the prequel. I'm referring to the 2006 sci fi comedy by director Matt
Judge which takes place 500 years in the future. One scene coming to mind
is the dinosaur scene at the end. You'll have to see the movie to find out
what I'm referring to.

Morgen would have known some of these
leaders. Others he had read about many times in the papers. He no doubt
had common acquaintances with others. However much he may have disagreed
with what they did during and before the war, that didn't change the fact
that he was one of the few people who knew, first-hand, that a giant lie
called the holocaust was being put on them. And he chose to do what he
could to save them.

Morgen couldn't deny the holocaust. If he did
that, he wouldn't have been called as a witness in the first place. It
would have been too much. It would have hurt the defendants' case. Not to
mention that denying the holocaust would also have ended any possibility
of a post-war legal career for himself. One need only look at what
happened when another German judge, Dr. Wilhelm Stäglich wrote "The
Auschwitz Myth" in the mid 1970's: They took his law degree away from him
retroactively. Commenting on what defendants in holocaust trials had to
do, Robert Faurisson states,

"That
ought to remind us of the unfortunates who in the Middle Ages were accused
of having met the devil on such and such a day, at such and such an hour,
in such and such a place. They would have been able to deny it fiercely.
They would have been able to go so far as to say: "You know very well that
I could not have met with the devil for one excellent reason, which is
that the devil does not exist." The unfortunates would have condemned
themselves by such responses. They had only one way out: to play the game
of their accusers, to admit that the devil was there without doubt, but
... at the top of the hill, while they themselves, located below, heard
the horrible noise (sobs, groans, cries, racket) made by the victims of
the devil." (30)

You
do what you can in the situation you're in. So Konrad Morgen created an
alternate version of the holocaust where the chain of command bypassed the
SS, so that the men on trial (all of whom were in the SS) would be seen as
not in the loop. The SS was designated a criminal organization and was
accused of implementing the genocide; thus Morgen testified at Nuremberg
as a witness for the defense of the SS. Morgen presents an alternate
holocaust version: The extermination order, he
said, went from Hitler, to Hitler's Chancellery office, to a man in the
Criminal Police named Christian Wirth who was not in the SS (who by the
way wasn't mentioned in the trial until Morgen mentioned him.) Wirth
single-handedly set the whole thing up, using ironically, Jewish recruits.
Only a couple lower-level SS even knew, according to Morgen.

Konrad Morgen tells the court how he first learned about the
extermination program: It was by way of hearing about an odd wedding at a
Jewish Labor camp near Lublin, with an extraordinary amount of invited
guests. He says:

"1,100 guests
participated in this Jewish wedding. What followed was described as quite
extraordinary owing to the gluttonous consumption of food and alcoholic
drinks. Among these Jews were members of the camp guard, that is to say
some SS men, who joined in this revelry." (31)

At
this point an askance look should come upon your face: Huh? How could Jews
in a concentration camp, who sleep on bunk beds, put on a wedding with so
many guests? How could they afford the food and drinks? And why in the
world would German SS men be invited to take part in the celebration?

Something seems fishy to investigator Morgen. Perhaps there's some
corruption going on in Lublin. So he travels there and talks to an
administrator, Christian Wirth, and right away Wirth confesses to an
enormous secret killing operation. Morgen then describes how Wirth
recruited Jews to kill other Jews.

"Wirth staged an enormous deceptive maneuver. He first
selected Jews who would, he thought, serve as column leaders, then these
Jews brought along other Jews, who worked under them. With that smaller or
medium-sized detachment of Jews, he began to build up the extermination
camps. He extended this staff of Jews, and with these Jews Wirth himself
carried out the extermination of the Jews.

Wirth said that he had
four extermination camps and that about 5,000 Jews were working at the
extermination of Jews and the seizure of Jewish property. In order to win
Jews for this business of extermination and plundering of their brethren
of race and creed, Wirth gave them every freedom and, so to speak, gave
them a financial interest in the spoliation of the dead victims. As a
result of this attitude, this sumptuous Jewish wedding had come
about."(32)

Oh,
so that explains the wedding. (What an incredibly absurd story, LOL.)
Morgen later said the Germans involved at the top, were so few you could
count them on your fingers.(33)
As if you could recruit 5,000 Jews to kill their own people without a
mutiny, and with just a few Germans at the top. But the Nuremberg Court is
gullible. If they believed the shrunken heads story, then they can believe
this. But fathom the absurdity of the story: a wedding of 1,100 guests and
the reason the Jews are friends with one another is they are in on a
multi-level scheme of killing other Jews and taking their money. So
enthusiastic are they, that they even invite the Germans to celebrate with
them. Morgen is filling-in a vacuum because the prosecution was not able
to explain the inner workings of the alleged genocide, and Morgen knew
enough to be able to fabricate that. And it appears that Thomas Dodd is
buying the story up to this point. Why else would he interject with the
following?

MR. DODD: "Mr. President,
we do not have the first responsibility, of course, for this defense. But
I have discussed with Mr. Elwyn Jones my objection, he has it in here, and
he finds no fault with it. It seems to me that what we are hearing here is
a lecture on the Prosecution's case, and I do not see how it in any sense
can be said to be a defense of the SS." (34)

When
Morgen gets to Auschwitz, he mentions that the killing happened in a
section called Monowitz. Some of the Germans on trial, in their mix of
depression, daydreaming, worrrying, and thinking, might have been actually
listening to the proceedings. If so they might have pricked up their ears
on hearing the word "Monowitz" and realized that Morgen was creating a
fake story to try and help them. As leaders of the government, they would
have known that Monowitz was a giant industrial section of Auschwitz that
was run by private companies. The killing couldn't have happened there.
Morgen adds a description so that no one can later say it was a slip of
the tongue and he meant Birkenau.

"The
Extermination Camp Monowitz lay far away from the concentration camp. It
was situated on an extensive industrial site and was not recognizable as
such and everywhere on the horizon there were smoking
chimneys."(35)

Morgen
then describes a secret killing operation comprised of non-Germans dressed
up as SS officers. But what Morgen is trying to do is not easy, because
lies inherently have problems. As we've seen. And the right question can
expose the problem. The presiding judge starts asking him such questions.
Morgen does his best, though it comes off a little non sequitur. Here's a
part of it:

MORGEN: They wore SS
uniforms.
THE PRESIDENT: Didn't you take the trouble to ascertain
whether they were proper members of the SS?
MORGEN: I said that they
were people from the Eastern territories.
THE PRESIDENT: I do not care
what you have already said. What I asked you was, didn't you take the
trouble to ascertain whether they were members of the SS?
MORGEN: I beg
your pardon, Your Lordship. I do not understand your question. They could
not be members of the General SS. As far as I could learn, they were
volunteers and draftees who had been recruited ' in the Baltic countries
where they had carried out security tasks, and who were then somehow
especially selected and sent to Auschwitz and Monowitz. These were special
troops, who had only this particular task and no other. They were
completely outside of the Waffen-SS ...
THE PRESIDENT: I didn't ask you
if they were in the Waffen SS. Did you ask questions as to why they were
put into SS uniforms?
MORGEN: No, I did not ask that question. It
seemed incomprehensible to me. It is probably due to the fact that the
commander of the Concentration Camp Auschwitz ...
THE PRESIDENT: Wait a
minute. You said, as I understand it, that you considered it
incomprehensible why they wore the SS uniforms. Didn't you say
that? (36)

Truth
can be examined and prodded from every single angle and hold up. It's
ironic that Morgen's made-up story is having a hard time holding up to the
proddings of the judge's questions. Ironic because the entire holocaust
story has a hard time holding up to Morgen's wartime
activities.

Despite Morgen's attempt at Nuremberg, the Germans were
mostly sentenced to death. He did what he could.

Morgen went on to
have a successful law practice in Frankfurt, West Germany. He died in
1982. Unbelievably, holocaust scholars tend to process him into a
"righteous gentile."37
Someone who tried to stop the killing from the inside. Like Oskar
Schindler, except Morgen's character didn't make it into the movie
Schindler's List. It should have because that movie is based on a Plaszow
camp commander named Amon Göth, who in reality existed, and who in reality
Konrad Morgen arrested and imprisoned. But can you imagine if toward the
end of the movie Schindler's List, the Nazis themselves arrest the head of
the camp? That couldn't be included. It wouldn't have flown with the
message Steven Spielberg was trying to put across. Morgen's actions, once
again, would have thrown a wrench into the works of the story.

One Third of The
Holocaust | New video:
Nazi Shrunken Heads | Thomas Blatt Sobibor
Fraud | Rebuttals |
Contact

N O T E S

1)
Let me explain to the English as a second language people the phrase "a
wrench in the works." By "works" imagine gears. Like the gears in an
old-fashioned stopwatch but bigger. A workman is working on these gears
and he drops a wrench, which then gets caught in the
gears, stopping them, or causing a racket (noise.) Similar you can think
of a car engine as "the works" and a mechanic is working above the running
engine when he accidentally drops his wrench into the moving
parts.

2) I had 30 chapters of my 4 hr. 15 min. video One Third of
The Holocaust, and my 25 minute video Nazi Shrunken Heads. All were
removed. Click below and scroll down to see some of the
youtube notifications:
http://www.onethirdoftheholocaust.com/rebuttals.html

3) See the video "Loose Change" on Youtube.

4)
Prior to this, there was a plan to create a Jewish homeland on Madagascar.
It was called the "Madagascar Plan." But with the war this wasn't possible. It's important to note that a lot of Jews
also wanted a homeland somewhere. Israel was the ideal place but Uganda
and Madagascar had also been possibilities.

5) Take Philip Mueller
and his book "Eyewitness Auschwitz." He claimed to be a sonderkommando.
That is an inmate who worked in the death part of the camp. He is featured
in Claude Lanzmann's movie Shoah, and he is used as a source in Raul
Hilberg's The Destruction of the European Jews. Hilberg
and Lanzmann use the same person because there aren't that many people to
use as a source.

6) And a major point is no one
could say anything 10-20 years later. There was no statute of limitations.
In fact 20 years later, all kinds of holocaust trials occurred in Germany
and more former guards were put in jail.

7) Karl Koch had left for
another camp in 1941. Ilse Koch had stayed at Buchenwald. In 1943 Morgen
arrested them as well as the deputy commander Hermann Florstedt, (who had
also since moved to another camp) and a Buchenwald doctor Waldemar Hoven.
All for stuff that had happened from '1937-41. Essentially Morgen was
there in 1943 investigating things that happened in 1937-41 involving camp administrators, the main two whom weren't there
anymore. During his investigation, the head of the camp was Hermann
Pister.

8) Morgen's testimony at Nuremberg Trial,
page 488 (website shows page numbers):
http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/imt/proc/08-07-46.htm

9)
Nuremberg Trial, pages 486 and 487
http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/imt/proc/08-07-46.htm

10)
The camp commander Karl Koch and the deputy commander, Herman Florstedt
were both executed for being involved in secretly and illegally killing
3-4 inmates. The Buchenwald camp did have "legal" executions of Soviet
Political Commissars. Most of whom, I believe, were Jewish. This policy
was due to the nature of what the Soviet Political Commissar did: They
stayed just behind the front lines (not endangering himself on the front lines) and kept the regular fighting soldiers
and their officers from retreating or surrendering under pain of death.
Apparently when the commissar system was in place, every commander had
commissars attached to him. It's been said that the incredibly high USSR
casualty rate of WWII is due to the Soviet Political Commissars. In the
rare cases that these commissars were caught, they were summarily executed
by the Germans. I don't know a lot about the commissar system.

11)
See Morgen's account beginning on page 488 of the
Nuremberg transcript. The website includes page numbers:
http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/imt/proc/08-07-46.htm

12)
This paper involves my supposition of how things came about. It is a
scenario of how I believe it could have happened. It involves some
guesswork. On my website Nazi Shrunken Heads, in the "conclusion" I give 3
possibilities of what could have happened. The standard story is obviously
not how it happened, so I give my best scenario of how it could have
happened in this paper. The "riding out on a horse"
part is what the elderly Albert G. Rosenberg told me in a phone
conversation in June 2007. See other possibilities in the conclusion
section of the following:
http://www.nazishrunkenheads.com/

13) My phone
conversation with Albert G. Rosenberg in June 2007. He mentioned Natal,
south of Belem, and I had to later get a globe and look at these cities
after the phone conversation to see where they were. We only had one phone
conversation which lasted almost 2 hours and he didn't know I was a
holocaust denier till the end. When he found out he was very steadfast
that "the holocaust happened." The phone call ended cordially. I know he
was in the military stationed in Brazil, but I'm not entirely sure if he
was in psych warfare then. I think he was. I'm not sure
which other psyche warfare members were with him there. I wish I'd asked.
There being there had something to do, he said, with shipping supplies to
Africa. I have a section about this conversation on my website
nazishrunkenheads.com.

14) Andreas Pfaffenberger affidavit. More on
him in this paper and on the website to my video Nazi Shrunken Heads.
Thomas J. Dodd Library has the affidavit. I've wondered
if Psyche Warfare might have pushed Pfaffenberger to include the shrunken
heads part.
http://www.lib.uconn.edu/online/research/speclib/
ASC/Nuremberg/Pfaffenberger.htm

(if
copying and pasting the above URL, make sure there is no space before the
"A" in "ASC."

15) The Buchenwald Report, translated, edited, and
with an introduction by David A. Hackett, Westview Press, 1995, bottom of
page 13 to page 14. Psyche Warfare even did a study on
how the local townspeople responded to Buchenwald photos posted at their
City Hall.

16)Time Magazine. October 13, 1986
http://www.time.com/time/maga
zine/printout/0,8816,962494,00.html
Also see #3 at Nazi
Shrunken Heads. To my knowledge, this was the first time "blowback" was
ever an issue. Sometimes the term "blowback" isn't a reference to
disinformation. It can also refer to a violent retaliation due to US
foreign policy. See Chalmers Johnson's book Blowback.
Written before 9-11, he essentially predicts, if memory serves, that a
9-11-like incident will happen in the conclusion.

17) The
Buchenwald Report, translated, edited, and with an introduction by David
A. Hackett, Westview Press, 1995
Professor David A. Hackett, who is not
a holocaust denier, documents this in the introduction of his book, page
5. The book is a translation of the 1945 "The Buchenwald
Report."
Hackett inadvertently reveals that nearly everyone in psyche
warfare involved regarding Buchenwald was Jewish. You can tell from their
names: Edward A. Tenenbaum, Albert G. Rosenberg, Daniel
Lerner, Saul Padover. Rosenberg was German Jewish. Tenenbaum was American
Jewish. Jews were probably around 2 percent of the US population at the
time. Tenenbaum was the first American to arrive at the camp along with a
civilian named Egon Fleck. On page 5 of Hackett's book, it mentions that
Tenenbaum stayed overnight in block 50. Maps show that that is in the
medical experiments area, which would have been the right place to plant
skin and shrunken heads. Then again Rosenberg could have planted them when
he arrived 5 days later.

18) The Buchenwald Report by David A.
Hackett. Page 13.

19) See my video Nazi Shrunken
Heads.
http://www.nazishrunkenheads.com/

20) Morgen said
the tattooed skin items were just rumours in an interview with John
Toland, the author of Adolf Hitler. The Definitive Biography. See
page 774 footnote at bottom of paperback edition published by Anchor books
in 1992.
Also, in the book, Nuremberg, The Last Battle by David
Irving. Irving says the same thing, but uses Toland's interview notes. On
page 223, he has footnote #492, which in the back we
see that Irving found Toland's notes in the Roosevelt Library. Here's the
footnote: Transcript of John Toland’s interview with
Konrad Morgen, attorney,Frankfurt, Oct. 25, 1971 (Roosevelt Library, John
Toland papers, box 53).

21) She turned out to be the
daughter of the US ambassador of Kuwait. See the footage of her speaking
in my video "Nazi Shrunken Heads" Also see link below to my graphic of the
timeline of the Nayirah hoax. Make sure you scroll to the right as this is
a wide image:
http://www.onethirdoftheholocaust.com/
nazishrunkenheads/Iraq_timeline.jpg

also see #4 of Nazishrunkenheads.com

22) Nuremberg
Trial transcript, page 515. The website includes page numbers:
http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/imt/proc/12-13-45.htm
For
internet footage of this moment in court at the US Holocaust Memorial
Museum website, click the first video at:
http://resources.ushmm.org/film/search/simple_search.php?
Query=concentration+camp+evidence+
presented+at+nuremberg+trial

Also see "topic #1" at this website:
http://www.nazishrunkenheads.com/

23) Nuremberg
Trial transcript, page 514:
http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/imt/proc/12-13-45.htm

24)
Nuremberg Trial Transcript. Beginning of the day's proceedings.
http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/imt/proc/12-14-45.htm

25)
Nuremberg Trial transcript, page 199: (website shows page numbers)
http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/imt/proc/01-14-46.htm

26)
Nuremberg Trial transcript, page 511: (website shows page numbers)
http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/imt/proc/08-08-46.htm

27)
You can see that from the date of the affidavit and it's contents. See the
affidavit at:
http://www.lib.uconn.edu/online/research/speclib/
ASC/Nuremberg/Pfaffenberger.htm

and my timeline of how it relates to the Americans taking
the camp:
http://www.onethirdoftheholocaust.com/nazishrunkenheads/
timeline_for_pfaffenberger.jpg

28)
See a graphic of that passage with my comments here:
http://www.onethirdoftheholocaust.com/nazishrunkenheads/
josef_reither_picture.jpg

29)
Nuremberg Trial transcript. Page 482 (website shows page numbers)
http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/imt/proc/08-07-46.htm

30)
Confessions of SS Men who were at Auschwitz by Robert Faurisson. Journal
of Historical Review. Summer 1981. Found online at:
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v02/v02p103_Faurisson.html

31)
Nuremberg Trial Transcript. Page 491
http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/imt/proc/08-07-46.htm

32)
Nuremberg Trial transcript page 492 (website shows page numbers)
http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/imt/proc/08-07-46.htm

33)
Nuremberg Trial transcript page 494 (website shows page numbers)
http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/imt/proc/08-07-46.htm

34)
Nuremberg Trial transcript page 496 (website shows page numbers)
http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/imt/proc/08-08-46.htm

35)
Nuremberg Trial transcript. Page 503
http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/imt/proc/08-08-46.htm

36)
Nuremberg Trial transcript. Page 503
http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/imt/proc/08-08-46.htm

37)
Revered holocaust historian Raul Hilberg frequently uses Morgen as a
source, and the structure of how Morgen described the killing operations
at Nuremberg became essentially the inner workings of the "Operation
Reinhardt" part of the standard holocaust story. He gave the myth makers
some good ideas as Arthur Butz points out in Hoax of the 20th Century on
page 217. Butz writes "Morgen’s ploy obviously inspired the prosecution
anew, because it had not occurred to relate exterminations to
euthanasia."

See
Hilberg using Morgen's affidavits as a valid holocaust source in the
footnotes on pages 872, 873, 892, 896 of:
The Destruction of the
European Jews
Holmes and Meier, 1985