![]() ![]() |
=date('M j, Y')?>
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Willingness to be and communicate
"You're not really upset by becoming things unless you are unwillingly forced into becoming something. And then you became something without your own determinism. And so you are being something you do not like to be, you do not want to be, and so you won't communicate with it. Although you're being it, you're not in communication with it. "When you become willing to be it you simply communicate with
it. The moment you communicate with it, it goes pshoo! It has the
same solidity as a vacuum. And that is how engrams are blown, how locks
are blown, how blocks, you might say held-down fives in computing machines,
and so forth, go by the boards that's how occlusion goes by the
boards." Excerpted from the Universe
Processes Congress
Theta-MEST Theory: Being a Problem Aspect An article by L. Ron Hubbard, from the
Universe Processes Congress
Just recently, I was working with it and suddenly realized that the principle of problems was inherent and was contained in the Theta-MEST Theory. Here we have something which is itself a solver of problems, a poser, a solver of problems impinged upon something which is never more than a problem. The difference between theta and MEST is, of course, theta can get ideas and MEST sometimes receives them. So we get theta as a no-motion thing impinged upon this all-motion thing, which is to say we get a solver, a poser and solver of problems here imposed on the raw material of problems. And that raw material is itself chaos. And out of this chaos theta brings order in organization. Now, that's actually an old theory that life is bringing order out of chaos; that God, for instance, they say, one cult, religion or another says that God brought order out of a chaos, and so forth. That's what a thetan is trying to do. He's trying to bring order out of a chaos. After he's failed several times he gets to be an organizer. But he gets fixated on it, but that is something that theta does. And this chaos is matter, energy, space, which in itself (combined at uniform rate) gives us time or MEST. All right, you say, what's this theory got to do with me? It's got a lot to do with you. It sure has. Has a lot to do with processing. And at the moment this was struck as an advance point in research and investigation, there wasn't any more problem, because one had taken in the anatomy of problems into the woof and warp of Scientology itself. What is the anatomy of a problem? Let's say, in terms of force, that a great many force vectors going in random directions will itself produce a confusion. That's the basic problem. A confusion. A number of force vectors traveling in a number of different directions. Life comes along, stops one of them, gets two more of them to line up and unite, gets a bunch more of them to go a different direction, makes a pattern out of it, makes it repetitive and has an automobile, a dam, has some face powder, see? The raw material of the problem. A bunch of confused vectors of force. A bunch of force confusions being lined up in some fashion or another, or disaligned for some purpose or other. Life has to put a purpose into that chaos and then make the chaos align itself. And so we have all kinds of things. We have automobiles, and we have thinking machines and electronic brains and nuclear physicists. We have all kinds of bric-a-brac in the society. Endless bric-a-brac, which is all planned and organized. The Theta-MEST Theory demonstrates that whatever is solving problems is Life, and whatever has problems to be solved is MEST. Ain't that horrible? Whatever is solving problems is Life. That could be said to be a definition of Life: that which is posing and solving problems. And that which has problems to be solved is MEST. Now, you see that? See that? That means that means that the auditor-preclear relationship is not really dependent upon transference, valence switches or any complexity of this character. It puts the preclear into a position he was not before willing to be. And as long as he was unwilling to be in that position, he would himself force himself into the position. That is to say, he's putting the preclear into the role of being the
physical universe. And the preclear simply starts being audited, he starts
answering up the answers to the problem, you see? He is taking that part
of him which is the physical universe, which is relatively inanimate,
which is not thinking, and he is willingly occupying that role and simply
by being willing to be it and willingly occupying it, he blows it. And
again becomes theta.
L. Ron Hubbard Excerpted from the lecture Theta-MEST Theory: Being a Problem Aspect This lecture is available in the Universe
Processes Congress
|
|
=getHTMLRemoveLink($_GET['email'],$_GET['update-key'])?> ©
2006 Bridge Publications, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Mailed
from Bridge Publications: |