

Currently released so far... 51122 / 251,287
Articles
Brazil
Sri Lanka
United Kingdom
Sweden
00. Editorial
United States
Latin America
Egypt
Jordan
Yemen
Thailand
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
2011/05/18
2011/05/19
2011/05/20
2011/05/21
2011/05/22
2011/05/23
2011/05/24
2011/05/25
2011/05/26
2011/05/27
2011/05/28
2011/05/29
2011/05/30
2011/05/31
2011/06/01
2011/06/02
2011/06/03
2011/06/04
2011/06/05
2011/06/06
2011/06/07
2011/06/08
2011/06/09
2011/06/10
2011/06/11
2011/06/12
2011/06/13
2011/06/14
2011/06/15
2011/06/16
2011/06/17
2011/06/18
2011/06/19
2011/06/20
2011/06/21
2011/06/22
2011/06/23
2011/06/24
2011/06/25
2011/06/26
2011/06/27
2011/06/28
2011/06/29
2011/06/30
2011/07/01
2011/07/02
2011/07/04
2011/07/05
2011/07/06
2011/07/07
2011/07/08
2011/07/10
2011/07/11
2011/07/12
2011/07/13
2011/07/14
2011/07/15
2011/07/16
2011/07/17
2011/07/18
2011/07/19
2011/07/20
2011/07/21
2011/07/22
2011/07/23
2011/07/25
2011/07/27
2011/07/28
2011/07/29
2011/07/31
2011/08/01
2011/08/02
2011/08/03
2011/08/05
2011/08/06
2011/08/07
2011/08/08
2011/08/09
2011/08/10
2011/08/11
2011/08/12
2011/08/13
2011/08/15
2011/08/16
2011/08/17
2011/08/18
2011/08/19
2011/08/21
2011/08/22
2011/08/23
2011/08/24
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Antananarivo
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Alexandria
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embasy Bonn
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Brazzaville
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangui
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Belfast
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Cotonou
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chiang Mai
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Chengdu
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
DIR FSINFATC
Consulate Dusseldorf
Consulate Durban
Consulate Dubai
Consulate Dhahran
Embassy Guatemala
Embassy Grenada
Embassy Georgetown
Embassy Gaborone
Consulate Guayaquil
Consulate Guangzhou
Consulate Guadalajara
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Hong Kong
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kolonia
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Krakow
Consulate Kolkata
Consulate Karachi
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Lusaka
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Lome
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy Libreville
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Leipzig
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Mission Geneva
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Mogadishu
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maseru
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Merida
Consulate Melbourne
Consulate Matamoros
Consulate Marseille
Embassy Nouakchott
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Nuevo Laredo
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Consulate Nagoya
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Praia
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Moresby
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Podgorica
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Hillah
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Surabaya
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy Tirana
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
Consulate Thessaloniki
USUN New York
USMISSION USTR GENEVA
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Mission CD Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
UN Rome
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vientiane
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AMGT
ASEC
AEMR
AR
APECO
AU
AORC
ADANA
AJ
AF
AFIN
AMED
AS
AM
ABLD
AFFAIRS
AMB
APER
ACOA
AND
AA
AE
AADP
AID
AO
AL
AG
AORD
ADM
AINF
AINT
ASEAN
AORG
ABT
APEC
AY
ASUP
ARF
AGOA
AVIAN
ATRN
ANET
AGIT
ASECVE
ABUD
AODE
ALOW
ADB
AN
ADPM
ASPA
ARABL
AFSN
AZ
AC
AIAG
AFSI
ASCE
ASIG
ACABQ
ADIP
AFGHANISTAN
AROC
ADCO
ACOTA
ANARCHISTS
AMEDCASCKFLO
AK
ARABBL
ASCH
ANTITERRORISM
AGRICULTURE
AOCR
ARR
ASSEMBLY
AORCYM
AFPK
ACKM
AGMT
AEC
APRC
AIN
AFPREL
ASFC
ASECTH
AFSA
AINR
AOPC
AFAF
AFARI
AX
ASECAF
ASECAFIN
AT
AFZAL
APCS
AGAO
AIT
ARCH
AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL
AMEX
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AORCD
AVIATION
ARAS
AINFCY
ACBAQ
AOPR
AREP
AOIC
ASEX
ASEK
AER
AGR
AMCT
AVERY
APR
AEMRS
AFU
AMG
ATPDEA
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AORL
ACS
AMCHAMS
AECL
AUC
ACAO
BA
BR
BB
BG
BEXP
BY
BRUSSELS
BU
BD
BTIO
BK
BL
BE
BMGT
BO
BM
BX
BN
BWC
BBSR
BTT
BC
BH
BILAT
BUSH
BHUM
BT
BTC
BMENA
BOND
BAIO
BP
BF
BRPA
BURNS
BUT
BBG
BCW
BOEHNER
BOL
BASHAR
BIDEN
BFIN
BZ
BEXPC
BTIU
CPAS
CA
CASC
CS
CBW
CIDA
CO
CODEL
CI
CROS
CU
CH
CWC
CMGT
CVIS
CDG
CTR
CG
CF
CHIEF
CJAN
CBSA
CE
CY
CB
CW
CM
CHR
CD
COE
CV
COUNTER
CT
CN
CPUOS
CTERR
CVR
CVPR
CDC
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CONS
COM
CACS
CR
CONTROLS
CAN
CACM
COMMERCE
CAMBODIA
CFIS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITES
CONDOLEEZZA
CZ
CTBT
CEN
CLINTON
CFED
CARC
CTM
CARICOM
CSW
CICTE
CYPRUS
CBE
CMGMT
CARSON
CWCM
CIVS
COUNTRYCLEARANCE
CENTCOM
CAPC
COPUOS
CKGR
CITEL
CQ
CITT
CIC
CARIB
CVIC
CAFTA
CVISU
CDB
CEDAW
CNC
CJUS
COMMAND
CENTER
COL
CAJC
CONSULAR
CLMT
CBC
CIA
CNARC
CIS
CEUDA
CHINA
CAC
CL
DR
DJ
DEMOCRATIC
DEMARCHE
DOMESTIC
DISENGAGEMENT
DB
DA
DHS
DAO
DCM
DAVID
DO
DEAX
DEFENSE
DEA
DTRO
DPRK
DOC
DTRA
DK
DAC
DOD
DRL
DRC
DCG
DE
DOT
DEPT
DOE
DS
DKEM
ECON
ETTC
EFIS
ETRD
EC
EMIN
EAGR
EAID
EFIN
EUN
ECIN
EG
EWWT
EINV
ENRG
ELAB
EPET
EIND
EN
EAIR
EUMEM
ECPS
ES
EI
ELTN
ET
EZ
EU
ER
EINT
ENGR
ECONOMIC
ENIV
EFTA
ETRN
EMS
EUREM
EPA
ESTH
EEB
EET
ENV
EAG
EXIM
ECTRD
ELNT
ENVIRONMENT
ECA
EAP
EINDIR
ETR
ECONOMY
ETRC
ELECTIONS
EICN
EXPORT
EARG
EGHG
EID
ETRO
EINF
EAIDHO
ECIP
EENV
EURM
EPEC
ERNG
ENERG
EIAD
EXBS
ED
EREL
ELAM
EK
EWT
ENGRD
EDEV
ECE
ENGY
EXIMOPIC
ETRDEC
ECCT
EUR
ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID
EFI
ECOSOC
EXTERNAL
ESCAP
ETCC
EENG
ERA
ENRD
ECLAC
ETRAD
EBRD
ENVR
ECONENRG
ELTNSNAR
ELAP
EPIT
EDUC
EAIDXMXAXBXFFR
EETC
EIVN
EDRC
EGOV
ETRA
EAIDRW
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ESA
ETRDGK
ENVI
ELN
EPRT
EPTED
ERTD
EUM
EAIDS
EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM
EDU
EV
EAIDAF
EDA
EPREL
EINVEFIN
EAGER
ETMIN
EUCOM
ECCP
EIDN
EINVKSCA
ENNP
EFINECONCS
ETC
EAIRASECCASCID
EINN
ETRP
ECONOMICS
ENERGY
EIAR
EINDETRD
ECONEFIN
EURN
ETRDEINVTINTCS
EFIM
ETIO
EATO
EIPR
EINVETC
ETTD
ETDR
EIQ
ECONCS
ENRGIZ
EAIG
ENTG
EUC
ERD
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECUN
FR
FI
FOREIGN
FARM
FIR
FAO
FK
FARC
FAS
FJ
FREEDOM
FAC
FINANCE
FBI
FTAA
FM
FCS
FAA
FORCE
FDA
FTA
FT
FCSC
FMGT
FINR
FIN
FDIC
FOR
FOI
FO
FMLN
FISO
GM
GERARD
GT
GA
GG
GR
GTIP
GH
GZ
GE
GB
GY
GAZA
GJ
GEORGE
GOI
GCC
GMUS
GI
GLOBAL
GV
GC
GL
GOV
GKGIC
GF
GWI
GIPNC
GUTIERREZ
GTMO
GANGS
GAERC
GUILLERMO
GASPAR
HR
HA
HYMPSK
HO
HK
HUMAN
HU
HN
HHS
HURI
HUD
HUMRIT
HUMANITARIAN
HUMANR
HL
HSTC
HILLARY
HCOPIL
HADLEY
HOURANI
HI
HUM
HEBRON
HUMOR
IZ
IN
IAEA
IS
IMO
ILO
IR
IC
IT
ITU
ID
IV
IMF
IBRD
IWC
ICAO
ICRC
INF
IO
IPR
ISO
IK
ISRAELI
IQ
ICES
IDB
INFLUENZA
IRAQI
ISCON
IGAD
IRAN
ITALY
IRAQ
ICTY
ICTR
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IQNV
IADB
INTERNAL
INMARSAT
IRDB
ILC
INCB
INRB
ICJ
ISRAEL
INR
IEA
ISPA
ICCAT
IOM
ITRD
IHO
IL
IFAD
ITRA
IDLI
ISCA
INL
INRA
INTELSAT
ISAF
ISPL
IRS
IEF
ITER
INDO
IIP
IND
IEFIN
IACI
IAHRC
INNP
IA
INTERPOL
IFIN
ISSUES
IZPREL
IRAJ
IF
ITPHUM
ITA
IP
IRPE
IDA
ISLAMISTS
ITF
INRO
IBET
IDP
IRC
KMDR
KPAO
KOMC
KNNP
KFLO
KDEM
KSUM
KIPR
KFLU
KE
KCRM
KJUS
KAWC
KZ
KSCA
KDRG
KCOR
KGHG
KPAL
KTIP
KMCA
KCRS
KPKO
KOLY
KRVC
KVPR
KG
KWBG
KTER
KS
KN
KSPR
KWMN
KV
KTFN
KFRD
KU
KSTC
KSTH
KISL
KGIC
KSEP
KFIN
KTEX
KTIA
KUNR
KCMR
KCIP
KMOC
KTDB
KBIO
KBCT
KMPI
KSAF
KACT
KFEM
KPRV
KPWR
KIRC
KCFE
KRIM
KHIV
KHLS
KVIR
KNNNP
KCEM
KLIG
KIRF
KNUP
KSAC
KNUC
KPGOV
KTDD
KIDE
KOMS
KLFU
KNNC
KMFO
KSEO
KJRE
KJUST
KMRS
KSRE
KGIT
KPIR
KPOA
KUWAIT
KIVP
KICC
KSCS
KPOL
KSEAO
KRCM
KSCI
KNAP
KGLB
KICA
KCUL
KPRM
KFSC
KQ
KPOP
KPFO
KPALAOIS
KREC
KBWG
KR
KTTB
KNAR
KCOM
KESS
KINR
KOCI
KWN
KCSY
KREL
KTBT
KFTN
KW
KRFD
KFLOA
KHDP
KNEP
KIND
KHUM
KSKN
KOMO
KDRL
KTFIN
KSOC
KPO
KGIV
KSTCPL
KSI
KPRP
KFPC
KNNB
KNDP
KICCPUR
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KDMR
KFCE
KIMMITT
KMCC
KMNP
KSEC
KOMCSG
KGCC
KRAD
KCRP
KAUST
KWAWC
KCHG
KRDP
KPAS
KTIAPARM
KPAOPREL
KWGB
KIRP
KMIG
KLAB
KSEI
KHSA
KNPP
KPAONZ
KWWW
KGHA
KY
KCRIM
KCRCM
KGCN
KPLS
KIIP
KPAOY
KTRD
KTAO
KJU
KBTS
KWAC
KFIU
KNNO
KPAI
KILS
KPA
KRCS
KWBGSY
KNPPIS
KNNPMNUC
KNPT
KERG
KLTN
KPREL
KTLA
KO
KAWK
KVRP
KAID
KX
KENV
KWCI
KNPR
KCFC
KNEI
KFTFN
KTFM
KCERS
KDEMAF
KMEPI
KEMS
KBTR
KEDU
KIRL
KNNR
KMPT
KPDD
KPIN
KDEV
KFRP
KTBD
KMSG
KWWMN
KWBC
KA
KOM
KWNM
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KRGY
KNNF
KICR
KIFR
KWMNCS
KPAK
KDDG
KCGC
KID
KNSD
KMPF
KWMM
MARR
MX
MASS
MOPS
MNUC
MCAP
MTCRE
MRCRE
MTRE
MASC
MY
MK
MG
MU
MILI
MO
MZ
MEPP
MCC
MEDIA
MOPPS
MI
MAS
MW
MP
MEPN
MV
MD
MR
MC
MCA
MT
MIL
MARITIME
MOPSGRPARM
MAAR
MOOPS
ML
MA
MN
MNUCPTEREZ
MTCR
MUNC
MPOS
MONUC
MGMT
MURRAY
MACP
MINUSTAH
MCCONNELL
MGT
MNUR
MF
MEPI
MOHAMMAD
MAR
MAPP
MNU
MFA
MTS
MLS
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MED
MNVC
MIK
MBM
MILITARY
MAPS
MARAD
MDC
MACEDONIA
MASSMNUC
MUCN
MQADHAFI
MPS
NZ
NATO
NI
NO
NU
NG
NL
NPT
NS
NA
NP
NASA
NSF
NEA
NANCY
NSG
NRR
NATIONAL
NMNUC
NC
NSC
NAS
NARC
NELSON
NATEU
NDP
NIH
NK
NIPP
NR
NERG
NSSP
NE
NTDB
NT
NEGROPONTE
NGO
NATOIRAQ
NAR
NZUS
NCCC
NH
NAFTA
NEW
NRG
NUIN
NOVO
NATOPREL
NV
NICHOLAS
NPA
NSFO
NW
NORAD
NPG
NOAA
OPRC
OPDC
OTRA
OECD
OVIP
OREP
ODC
OIIP
OAS
OSCE
OPIC
OMS
OFDP
OFDA
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OSCI
OM
OPAD
ODPC
OIC
ODIP
OPPI
ORA
OCEA
OREG
OMIG
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXP
OPEC
OFPD
OAU
OCII
OIL
OVIPPRELUNGANU
OSHA
OPCD
OPCR
OF
OFDPQIS
OSIC
OHUM
OTR
OBSP
OGAC
OESC
OVP
ON
OES
OTAR
OCS
PREL
PGOV
PARM
PINR
PHUM
PM
PREF
PTER
PK
PINS
PBIO
PHSA
PE
PBTS
PA
PL
POL
PAK
POV
POLITICS
POLICY
PO
PRELTBIOBA
PKO
PIN
PNAT
PU
PGOVPREL
PALESTINIAN
PTERPGOV
PELOSI
PAS
PP
PTEL
PROP
PRELAF
PRHUM
PRE
PUNE
PIRF
PVOV
PROG
PERSONS
PROV
PKK
PRGOV
PH
PLAB
PDEM
PCI
PRL
PRM
PINSO
PERM
PETR
PPAO
PERL
PBS
PETERS
PRELBR
PCON
POLITICAL
PMIL
POLM
PKPA
PNUM
PLO
PTERM
PJUS
PARMP
PNIR
PHUMKPAL
PG
PREZ
PGIC
PAO
PROTECTION
PRELPK
PGOVENRG
PATTY
PSOC
PARTIES
PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ
PMIG
PAIGH
PARK
PETER
PHUS
PKPO
PGOVECON
POUS
PMAR
PWBG
PAR
PGOVGM
PHUH
PTE
PY
POLUN
PDOV
PGOVSOCI
PGOVPM
PRELEVU
PGOR
PBTSRU
PHUMA
PHUMR
PPD
PGV
PRAM
PARMS
PINL
PSI
PKPAL
PPA
PTERE
PGOF
PINO
PREO
PHAS
PAC
PRESL
PORG
PS
PGVO
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PINT
PRELP
PREFA
PNG
PTBS
PFOR
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PREK
PHJM
POLINT
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PECON
PEACE
PROCESS
PLN
PEDRO
PF
PGPV
PCUL
PGGV
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGIV
PHUMPREL
POGOV
PEL
PBT
PAMQ
PINF
PSEPC
POSTS
PAHO
PHUMPGOV
PGOC
PNR
RS
RP
RU
RW
RFE
RCMP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
REFORM
RO
ROW
ROBERT
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RELATIONS
RAY
ROBERTG
RIGHTS
RM
RATIFICATION
RREL
RBI
RICE
ROOD
REL
RODHAM
RGY
RUEHZO
RELIGIOUS
RELFREE
RUEUN
RELAM
RSP
RF
REO
REGIONAL
RUPREL
RI
REMON
RPEL
RSO
SCUL
SENV
SOCI
SZ
SNAR
SO
SP
SU
SY
SI
SMIG
SYR
SA
SW
SF
SR
SYRIA
SNARM
START
SPECIALIST
SG
SNIG
SCI
SGWI
SE
SIPDIS
SANC
SELAB
SN
SETTLEMENTS
SCIENCE
SENVENV
SENS
SPCE
SPAS
SECURITY
SENC
SOCIETY
SOSI
SENVEAGREAIDTBIOECONSOCIXR
SEN
SPECI
ST
SL
SENVCASCEAIDID
SC
SECRETARY
STR
SNA
SOCIS
SADC
SEP
SK
SHUM
SYAI
SMIL
STEPHEN
SNRV
SKCA
SENSITIVE
SECI
SCUD
SCRM
SGNV
SECTOR
SAARC
SENVSXE
SWMN
STEINBERG
SOPN
SOCR
SCRS
SWE
SARS
SNARIZ
SUDAN
SENVQGR
SAN
SM
SFNV
SSA
SPCVIS
SOFA
SCULKPAOECONTU
SENVKGHG
SHI
SEVN
SH
SNARCS
SNARN
SIPRS
TBIO
TW
TRGY
TSPA
TU
TPHY
TI
TX
TH
TIP
TSPL
TNGD
TZ
TS
TC
TK
TURKEY
TERRORISM
TPSL
TINT
TRSY
TERFIN
TPP
TT
TECHNOLOGY
TE
TAGS
TRAFFICKING
TJ
TN
TO
TD
TP
TREATY
TR
TA
TIO
TECH
TF
TRAD
TNDG
TWI
TPSA
TWL
TAUSCHER
TRBY
TL
TV
THPY
TSPAM
TREL
TRT
TNAR
TFIN
TWCH
THOMMA
THOMAS
TERROR
TRY
TBID
UK
UNESCO
UNSC
UNGA
UN
US
UZ
USEU
UG
UP
UNAUS
UNMIK
USTR
UY
USUN
UNEP
UNDC
UV
UNPUOS
UNSCR
USAID
UNODC
UNRCR
UNHCR
UNDP
UNCRIME
UA
UNHRC
UNRWA
UNO
UNCND
UNCHR
USAU
UNICEF
USPS
UNOMIG
UNESCOSCULPRELPHUMKPALCUIRXFVEKV
UR
UNFICYP
UNCITRAL
UNAMA
UNVIE
USTDA
USNC
UNCSD
USCC
UNEF
UNGAPL
USSC
UNMIC
UNTAC
UNCLASSIFIED
USDA
UNCTAD
USGS
UNFPA
UNSE
USOAS
UE
UAE
UNCHS
UNDESCO
UNC
UNSCS
UKXG
UNGACG
UNHR
UNBRO
UNCHC
UNFCYP
UNIDROIT
WHTI
WIPO
WTRO
WHO
WTO
WMO
WFP
WEET
WS
WE
WA
WHA
WBG
WILLIAM
WI
WSIS
WCL
WEBZ
WZ
WW
WWBG
WMD
WWT
WMN
WWARD
WITH
WTRQ
WCO
WEU
WB
WBEG
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 08USOSCE197, FSC: END-OF ROUND WINTER-SPRING-SUMMER 2008:
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08USOSCE197.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
08USOSCE197 | 2008-07-31 14:27 | 2011-08-24 01:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Mission USOSCE |
VZCZCXRO0396
PP RUEHAST RUEHFL RUEHLA RUEHMRE RUEHPOD RUEHROV RUEHSR
DE RUEHVEN #0197/01 2131427
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 311427Z JUL 08
FM USMISSION USOSCE
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 5868
INFO RUCNOSC/ORG FOR SECURITY CO OP IN EUR COLLECTIVE
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 0568
RUEHUNV/USMISSION UNVIE VIENNA 1123
RHMFISS/CDR USEUCOM VAIHINGEN GE
RHMFISS/CDRUSAREUR HEIDELBERG GE
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC
RHDLCNE/CINCUSNAVEUR LONDON UK
RUEKJCS/DIA WASHDC
RUEASWA/DTRA ALEX WASHINGTON DC
RUESDT/DTRA-OSES DARMSTADT GE
RHMFIUU/HQ USCENTCOM MACDILL AFB FL
RUEKJCS/JCS WASHDC
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC
RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA 1067
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 08 USOSCE 000197
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
STATE FOR VCI/CCA, VCI/NRRC, EUR/RPM, EUR/PRA, EUR/CARC,
SCA/CEN, SCA/RA, PM/WRA
JCS FOR J-5
OSD FOR ISA (PERENYI)
NSC FOR DOWLEY
USUN FOR LEGAL, POL
EUCOM FOR J-5
CENTCOM FOR J-5
UNVIE FOR AC
GENEVA FOR CD
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PARM PREL KCFE OSCE RS XG
SUBJECT: FSC: END-OF ROUND WINTER-SPRING-SUMMER 2008:
IMPASSE OVER CSBMS CONTINUES
¶1. (SBU) Summary: The 2008 winter and spring-summer rounds
in the Forum for Security Cooperation were highlighted by
extensive discussion of the April 20 UAV incident in Georgia
and U.S. missile defense in Europe. Russia pushed several
CSBM proposals, including its rapid reaction forces
information exchange, but the FSC adopted only the decision
on considering national holidays when planning verification
calendars. Russia expects continued discussion of it naval
CSBM and Vienna Document-related proposals in the fall.
¶2. (SBU) Finland, the OSCE 2008 CiO, will chair the FSC in
the autumn, and has announced Security Dialogue presentations
on armed forces and human rights, SALW issues, violence and
development, and the OSCE mission to Bosnia. Several draft
decisions and other proposals remain on the working group
agenda for the autumn session including end-use certificates,
SALW trafficking by air, and an update of the Code of Conduct
Questionnaire.
¶3. (SBU) U.S. goals were largely met, to include maintaining
Allied cohesion in response to Russian CSBM proposals;
arranging or U.S. presentations in the Security Dialogue that
advance strategic objectives; and substantial progress toward
a Best Practices Guide on UNSCR 1540. However, on a number
of issues the U.S. has found itself isolated or virtually so,
sometimes because of the lateness of its interventions. This
has often meant that the natural leadership position of the
U.S. has, by default, increasingly been assumed by Russia and
Germany. Washington, see para 35 for guidance requests. End
summary.
CSBMs
-----
¶4. (SBU) Rapid Reaction Forces - There has been no further
movement in the working group on the proposal made by Russia
and Belarus for a recurring information exchange on rapid
reaction forces (FSC.DEL/545/06), although informal
discussions among the Russian, British, French, German, and
U.S. delegations have raised the possibility of alternative
language. This subject remains of critical interest to
France, Germany, and the UK, who have repeatedly asked for a
U.S. response to their counter-proposal to the Russian paper.
Mission still awaits Washington guidance on the Russian
reaction forces paper and Allied counter-proposal.
¶5. (SBU) Naval Forces - Russia has again proposed naval
forces CSBMs, little changed from a 1997 proposal, that would
require prior notification of, and invitation of observers to
certain naval activities. The measure would also include an
exchange of annual calendars on naval activities and allow
for reciprocal visits to naval bases. The U.S. and others
commented on the apparent lack of need for such a measure and
were generally skeptical while avoiding outright rejection at
the first discussion of the paper. The proposal will revert
to the working group agenda in the fall.
Vienna Document
---------------
¶6. (SBU) Chair's Statement on Timelines for Requesting
Inspections or Evaluations - Russia lobbied extensively for
the FSC chair's statement, made on June 18, that urges
USOSCE 00000197 002 OF 008
"strict" compliance with the timelines for requesting
inspections or evaluations under paragraphs 85 and 112 of the
Vienna Document 1999 (FSC/DEL/75/08/Rev.3). Russia objects
to the practice of pS making "early" requests, particularly
in cases where the inspected State's quota is usually
exhausted early in the year. The CPC will, at Russia's
request, compile statistics on compliance from May to
December 2008 with the Vienna Document timelines. Russia's
initial attempt to address the quota race with a decision was
resisted by delegations as requiring the Vienna Document to
be reopened.
¶7. (SBU) Quota Race Continued - Germany proposed measures to
"alleviate" problems arising out of the race for Vienna
Document inspection quotas on certain "countries of interest,
i.e., Russia, Ukraine, Kazakhstan, and Georgia. These
included dividing the inspection year into three parts, each
with its own sub-quota, and beginning the year in April when
weather is more conducive to military activities and
inspections of them. The U.S. resists these proposals as
overly complicated and not addressing the real cause of the
race: oversubscription of quota on a handful of countries.
The U.S. recommended reliance instead on mutual forbearance,
sub-regional arrangements, and bilateral measures. Germany
withdrew the proposal after extensive criticism in the
working group and elsewhere. A revised version may be
submitted.
¶8. (SBU) Russian VD99 Proposals - Russia resurrected three of
the measures it proposed in late 2007 for "improving the
implementation of the Vienna Document." The decision to take
national holidays into account when planning verification
activities was approved (FSC.DEC/2/08), although several
delegations including the U.S. believe the decision merely
describes the current practice of most pS.
¶9. (SBU) Russia has also proposed decisions on specifying the
area of inspection under the Vienna document at 25,000 square
kilometers (FSC.DEL/493/07/Rev.2), up from 18,000 square
kilometers in an earlier proposal, and on requiring annual
notification of at least one major military activity below
the threshold for mandatory notification under paragraph 40
of the document (FSC.DEL/495./07/Rev.3). These proposals
will remain on the working group agenda in the fall, having
drawn little substantive comment to date except Denmark's
suggestion to include a point-to-point maximum distance of
300 kilometers. The U.S. currently opposes the proposal to
limit the specified area and insists that any notification of
military activities involving NATO Allies would require prior
consultation within NATO.
Code of Conduct
---------------
¶10. (SBU) The FSC adopted an uncontroversial decision on
awareness raising and outreach for the Code of Conduct
(FSC.DEC/1/08) that requires national replies to the
Questionnaire be posted on the OSCE public website, at least
one Code-related special event each year, and engagement with
the OSCE Partners to encourage their adoption of Code
principles.
¶11. (SBU) Work on an update of the Code of Conduct
Questionnaire, meant to use more direct questions, avoid
USOSCE 00000197 003 OF 008
duplication, and solicit clear, unambiguous responses,
continued through 2008 with numerous informal drafting
sessions and extensive discussion in the working group. The
FSC Code coordinator, Anton Eischer of Austria, has asked
delegations to be ready to make final edits to the draft when
they return to Vienna in September.
¶12. (SBU) The latest version (FSC.DEL/98/08) has little of
the new material earlier proposed by the sponsors (Austria,
Switzerland, France) to reflect changes in the security
environment of Europe since the current Questionnaire was
drafted in the mid 1990s. Turkey and Germany in particular
are concerned about questions that require divulgence of
sensitive information on defense planning and operations.
Germany wants some reference to private military companies.
Sweden insists that the final version of the Questionnaire
include references to UNSCR 1325 on the participation of
women in conflict resolution and peace-making.
¶13. (SBU) Russia believes the update to be largely a waste of
time and resists including "tangential matters" like
democratic control of the armed forces in the update. The
U.S. has yet to make any specific textual edits, but its
recommendation to make the format and instructions for
submitting replies separate documents was accepted.
SALW/SCA
--------
¶14. (SBU) Biennial Meeting of States and Future of SALW - A
special working group meeting was devoted to planning the
OSCE participation in the third Biennial Meeting of States on
the UN Program of Action on SALW (UNPOA), held in New York
July 14-18. There was grudging consensus that the OSCE
should describe its ongoing efforts at implementation of
existing SALW norms and its field projects to eliminate
surpluses and support better stockpile management. Germany
complained of the lack of normative work and proposed the
OSCE undertake a review of its SALW work, consider
"standardizing" SALW reporting requirements in light of the
UNPOA, and consider merging the separate OSCE Documents on
SALW and SCA. The U.S. successfully resisted reference to
the BMS in the decision on the publication of a handbook of
Best Practice Guides on stockpiles of conventional ammunition
(FSC.DEC/6/08).
¶15. (SBU) End-User Certificates - Belarus, with heavy German
support, has sponsored a draft decision that would require an
exchange of exemplars of end-user certificates to be followed
by an analysis of the submissions by the CPC. The U.S. has
questioned the utility of the exchange and analysis and
challenged the rationale for them put forward by Belarus and
Germany. The latter has criticized the U.S. for the timing
of its comments, although has not rebutted the U.S.
contention that the key issue is not the design of the EUC
but the performance of effective end-use checks
¶16. (SBU) Points of Contact List - Denmark sponsored a
decision to maintain a list of points of contact on SALW/SCA
issues, including financing, project management, and
technical best practices (FSC.DEC/4/08), although many
delegations doubted the need for an additional list beyond
that already maintained by the Conflict Prevention Center.
USOSCE 00000197 004 OF 008
¶17. (SBU) MANPADS - The OSCE's MANPADS export controls
principles were updated to accord with recent amendments to
the Wassenaar Arrangement principles in a decision initially
sponsored by Finland (FSC.DEC/5/08). The decision also
includes the principles adopted in 2004.
¶18. (SBU) CAT - The FSC decided to update the OSCE's
conventional arms transfers reporting categories to accord
with recent changes in the UN Register of Conventional Arms
(FSC.DEC/8/08). Germany sponsored the decision, hoping to
encourage pS also to submit data on SALW transfers, both
within and outside the OSCE. The decision encourages pS to
do this, but there is no additional requirement beyond those
found in the OSCE decisions that established the CAT
information exchange (FSC.DEC/13/97 and 8/98). The U.S. has
announced its intention to revisit the issue of redundancy in
providing the same report on CAT in the OSCE as well as the
UN.
¶19. (SBU) Mine Action - Germany has proposed a more active
role for the OSCE in landmine and explosive remnants of war
abatement. This follows the special FSC meeting on mine
action in January that broke little new ground but featured
repeated calls by France and others for universal accession
to the Ottawa Convention.
¶20. (SBU) Brokering - The CPC has prepared, in response to a
request from Finland in light of several late submissions, a
revised analysis of the national submissions to the one-off
exchange on SALW brokering practices (FSC.DEC/11/07;
SEC.GAL/34/08).
¶21. (SBU) Illicit Air Trafficking - A French and Belgian
proposal to adopt Wassenaar Arrangement "best practices" on
air transfer of SALW as an OSCE document and to conduct a
one-off information exchange of national practices regulating
air transfer of SALW is still under negotiation as a draft
decision (FSC.DD/98/08/Rev.3). The U.S. proposal to endorse
the Wassenaar principles themselves instead of an OSCE
version of them is resisted by most delegations, who note
that the FSC has never, except for UN "global" agreements,
adopted an entire document from another international
organization. Delegations also resist changing, as proposed
by the U.S., the phrase in operative paragraph 1 of the draft
decision, "adopt the Best Practices", to "endorse" or
"welcome" them. The U.S. is effectively isolated on both
these questions.
Security Dialogue
-----------------
¶22. (SBU) The FSC Security Dialogue in 2008 has been vigorous
and sometimes controversial, with running debates over
missile defense, Kosovo, and military incidents in Georgia.
Less incendiary discussions included cluster munitions; cyber
security; mine action in Croatia, Azerbaijan, and the Baltic;
private security companies; border security; Serbian defense
policy; the Wassenaar Arrangement; and the Nordic EU battle
group. U.S. Assistant Secretary of Defense Paul McHale
addressed "international partnerships for homeland defense
and crisis response on July 9." Delegations asked several
questions on comparison between the U.S. federal-state
partnerships and cooperation by NATO and the EU with national
USOSCE 00000197 005 OF 008
governments in civil-military emergency planning.
¶23. (SBU) Missile Defense - The U.S. assertively countered
Russian complaints that U.S. missile defense installations
planned for the Czech Republic and Poland threaten the
stability of European security by repeating offers to consult
with Russia over the MD deployments and share information on
the likely missile threats to Europe from Iran. The U.S.
also repeated the offer to work with Russia and NATO to
develop regional missile defense architecture.
¶24. (SBU) Cyber Security - Estonia led a discussion of cyber
security that included presentations by official from Estonia
and Finland. Estonia has proposed an information exchange on
cyber security national experiences and best practices to be
followed by a workshop.
¶25. (SBU) Georgia - Russia shot down a Georgian UAV on April
20 over Abkhazia. Georgia subsequently invoked the Vienna
Document Chapter III conflict resolution mechanism to discuss
the incident and related developments in a joint
FSC-Permanent Council (PC) meeting. Georgia had earlier
invoked the "Bucharest mechanism" (MC.DEC/3/01) and requested
a full OSCE investigation of the incident but Russia refused
to accede to it. The findings of experts from the U.S., the
Baltic states, and UNOMIG who investigated the incident were
presented during the discussion. These concluded the
Georgian UAV was likely shot down by a Russian fighter. At
the FSC-PC Georgia presented a video recording taken by the
UAV camera before the drone was destroyed by a missile
launched from a Russian fighter and radar tracks from
Georgia's air traffic control system. Russia claimed it
lacked all relevant evidence and refused to participate in
further discussion until it received the "missing evidence."
¶26. (SBU) Georgia consulted extensively with the U.S. in
preparation for these meetings, in all of which the U.S
actively participated. At the beginning of the crisis when
many Allies were skeptical that Russia had actually downed
the UAV, the U.S., inter alia, exhibited and discussed
photographs of the Russian aircraft and missiles mentioned by
the investigators, but did not per se accuse Russia. This
eliminated the confusion and uncertainty in the minds of many
delegations. The U.S. prepared a terrain analysis showing
the area where the UAV was shot down. The U.S., in response
to uncertainty and confusion expressed by delegations,
actively participated at the FSC-PC by The U.S. repeatedly
called on all parties to the incident and larger conflict to
exercise restraint and not escalate the situation by
deploying additional military forces into the region.
¶27. (SBU) Kosovo - Russia accused the U.S. of contravention
of UN resolutions against supplying arms to Kosovo after the
Presidential finding that Kosovo was eligible for U.S>
security assistance. The U.S. responded that the arms
embargo had been lifted and any U.S. assistance would be in
line with the Ahtisaari plan that would support civilian
controlled military forces that would provide for national
and regional defense and could participate in humanitarian
missions.
¶28. (SBU) Autumn Session Topics - Finland will chair the FSC
in the autumn round. It anticipates the Security Dialogue
USOSCE 00000197 006 OF 008
presentations on human rights in the armed forces, the
Biennial Meeting of States on the UNPOA on SALW, naval CSBMs,
and UNSCR 1540. Finland has solicited U.S. presentations on
the Proliferation Security Initiative, the Defense
Department's new Africa Command, and pandemic illnesses.
Mission is currently arranging a presentations on maritime
security by the U.S. Coast Guard commandant and on the new
National Defense Strategy.
ASRC
----
¶29. (SBU) Key addresses at the July 2008 Annual Security
Review Conference (ASRC) arms control and CSBM working
session focused on the state of arms control and prospects
for the future pointed to the globalization of the security
agendas as the underlying cause of the current CFE impasse.
Recommendations included a return to European-centered
security and shaping future agreements to include "principles
of modern arms control" void of limits based on outdated
numerical balance of forces. The U.S. and allies exchanged
positions with Russia on the causes of, and actions required
to resolve, the impasse over CFE.
AIAM
----
¶30. (SBU) At the March 2008 Annual Implementation and
Assessment Meeting delegations restricted themselves to broad
recommendations meant for detailed development in the FSC
working groups. Russia did not engage in its usual practice
of berating pS for "lack of progress" in adopting its various
CSBM proposals. Among topics discussed were the Vienna
Document "quota race," improving the timeliness of defense
planning and budget submissions, and reporting "significant"
military activities. Several NATO Allies opposed linking the
impasse over CFE to continuing work in the FSC on Vienna
Document implementation and other CSBMs, but did not actually
endorse any specific proposal, including Russian ones.
HOV
---
¶31. (SBU) At the Heads of Verification Meeting held the day
before the AIAM, discussion anticipated the AIAM agenda and
included the Vienna Document "quota race," a Schengen visa
for non-Schengen inspecting states, a best practices guide
for conducting air base and military facilities visit and new
equipment demonstrations, and the role of OSCE "assistants"
in the Article IV (Dayton Peace Accords) verification regime.
Unlike 2007, the verifications officials did not stray into
policy recommendations and specifically did not attempt to
coordinate Vienna Document inspection schedules.
Best Practice Guides
--------------------
¶32. (SBU) The FSC approved the publication of a handbook of
Best Practice Guides on stockpiles of conventional
ammunition. And two additional guides, on ammunition
destruction and stockpile security, were endorsed for
inclusion in the handbook.
USOSCE 00000197 007 OF 008
¶33. (SBU) Best Practice Guides on UNSCR 1540 are currently
being developed by the U.S. and Canada. The U.S. guide, on
expert controls and transshipment, is near completion, after
extensive revision based on EU comments. Canada is preparing
a revision of its draft guide on physical security.
U.S. Tactics
------------
¶34. (SBU) COMMENT: Largely because of the lateness of U.S.
interventions, the U.S. delegation has been isolated or in a
corner with a country like Belarus on several proposals under
consideration in the FSC. Although the substance of U.S.
interventions is not always immediately well-received,
earlier intervention would allow the U.S. delegation time to
lobby other delegations and influence the course on
negotiations in the working groups. As it is, many
delegations reject out of hand U.S. proposals as "too little
and too late." Russia and, increasingly, Germany have
inserted themselves into the leadership vacuum resulting from
U.S. silence and inactivity. END COMMENT.
Requests for Guidance
--------------------
¶35. (SBU) Mission requests guidance on the following draft
decisions and other proposals under consideration in the FSC
at the close of the 2008 spring-summer session that will be
taken up again in September:
-- Food-for-thought paper on an information exchange on
multinational rapid reaction forces (FSC.DEL/545/06) and
Germany's counter-proposal (seen only by France, the UK, and
the U.S.)
-- Food-for thought paper on naval CSBMs (FSC.DEL/120/08)
-- Proposal for a draft decision on the dimensions of the
(Vienna Document) "specified area" of inspection
(FSC.DEL/493/07/Rev.2)
-- Proposal for a draft decision on (Vienna Document) prior
notification of major military activities
(FSC.DEL/495/07/Rev.3)
-- Draft decision on end-user certificate information
exchange (FSC.DEL/108/08)
-- Draft decision on best practices and questionnaire on
preventing destabilizing transfers of SALW through air
transport (FSC.DD/10/08)
-- Proposal for a draft decision on Code of Conduct
Questionnaire update (FSC.DEL/98/08/Rev.3)
-- Food-for-thought paper on a more active OSCE rile in
addressing landmines and explosive remnants of war
(FSC.DEL/126/08)
-- Proposal for a draft decision for a cyber security
information exchange and workshop (FSC.DEL/125/08)
Next Meeting
USOSCE 00000197 008 OF 008
------------
¶36. (U) The first FSC plenary meeting of the autumn session
will be on September 10; the first working group meetings
will be on September 17.
SCOTT