

Currently released so far... 51122 / 251,287
Articles
Brazil
Sri Lanka
United Kingdom
Sweden
00. Editorial
United States
Latin America
Egypt
Jordan
Yemen
Thailand
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
2011/05/18
2011/05/19
2011/05/20
2011/05/21
2011/05/22
2011/05/23
2011/05/24
2011/05/25
2011/05/26
2011/05/27
2011/05/28
2011/05/29
2011/05/30
2011/05/31
2011/06/01
2011/06/02
2011/06/03
2011/06/04
2011/06/05
2011/06/06
2011/06/07
2011/06/08
2011/06/09
2011/06/10
2011/06/11
2011/06/12
2011/06/13
2011/06/14
2011/06/15
2011/06/16
2011/06/17
2011/06/18
2011/06/19
2011/06/20
2011/06/21
2011/06/22
2011/06/23
2011/06/24
2011/06/25
2011/06/26
2011/06/27
2011/06/28
2011/06/29
2011/06/30
2011/07/01
2011/07/02
2011/07/04
2011/07/05
2011/07/06
2011/07/07
2011/07/08
2011/07/10
2011/07/11
2011/07/12
2011/07/13
2011/07/14
2011/07/15
2011/07/16
2011/07/17
2011/07/18
2011/07/19
2011/07/20
2011/07/21
2011/07/22
2011/07/23
2011/07/25
2011/07/27
2011/07/28
2011/07/29
2011/07/31
2011/08/01
2011/08/02
2011/08/03
2011/08/05
2011/08/06
2011/08/07
2011/08/08
2011/08/09
2011/08/10
2011/08/11
2011/08/12
2011/08/13
2011/08/15
2011/08/16
2011/08/17
2011/08/18
2011/08/19
2011/08/21
2011/08/22
2011/08/23
2011/08/24
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Antananarivo
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Alexandria
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embasy Bonn
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Brazzaville
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangui
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Belfast
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Cotonou
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chiang Mai
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Chengdu
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
DIR FSINFATC
Consulate Dusseldorf
Consulate Durban
Consulate Dubai
Consulate Dhahran
Embassy Guatemala
Embassy Grenada
Embassy Georgetown
Embassy Gaborone
Consulate Guayaquil
Consulate Guangzhou
Consulate Guadalajara
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Hong Kong
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kolonia
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Krakow
Consulate Kolkata
Consulate Karachi
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Lusaka
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Lome
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy Libreville
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Leipzig
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Mission Geneva
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Mogadishu
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maseru
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Merida
Consulate Melbourne
Consulate Matamoros
Consulate Marseille
Embassy Nouakchott
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Nuevo Laredo
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Consulate Nagoya
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Praia
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Moresby
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Podgorica
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Hillah
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Surabaya
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy Tirana
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
Consulate Thessaloniki
USUN New York
USMISSION USTR GENEVA
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Mission CD Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
UN Rome
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vientiane
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AMGT
ASEC
AEMR
AR
APECO
AU
AORC
ADANA
AJ
AF
AFIN
AMED
AS
AM
ABLD
AFFAIRS
AMB
APER
ACOA
AND
AA
AE
AADP
AID
AO
AL
AG
AORD
ADM
AINF
AINT
ASEAN
AORG
ABT
APEC
AY
ASUP
ARF
AGOA
AVIAN
ATRN
ANET
AGIT
ASECVE
ABUD
AODE
ALOW
ADB
AN
ADPM
ASPA
ARABL
AFSN
AZ
AC
AIAG
AFSI
ASCE
ASIG
ACABQ
ADIP
AFGHANISTAN
AROC
ADCO
ACOTA
ANARCHISTS
AMEDCASCKFLO
AK
ARABBL
ASCH
ANTITERRORISM
AGRICULTURE
AOCR
ARR
ASSEMBLY
AORCYM
AFPK
ACKM
AGMT
AEC
APRC
AIN
AFPREL
ASFC
ASECTH
AFSA
AINR
AOPC
AFAF
AFARI
AX
ASECAF
ASECAFIN
AT
AFZAL
APCS
AGAO
AIT
ARCH
AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL
AMEX
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AORCD
AVIATION
ARAS
AINFCY
ACBAQ
AOPR
AREP
AOIC
ASEX
ASEK
AER
AGR
AMCT
AVERY
APR
AEMRS
AFU
AMG
ATPDEA
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AORL
ACS
AMCHAMS
AECL
AUC
ACAO
BA
BR
BB
BG
BEXP
BY
BRUSSELS
BU
BD
BTIO
BK
BL
BE
BMGT
BO
BM
BX
BN
BWC
BBSR
BTT
BC
BH
BILAT
BUSH
BHUM
BT
BTC
BMENA
BOND
BAIO
BP
BF
BRPA
BURNS
BUT
BBG
BCW
BOEHNER
BOL
BASHAR
BIDEN
BFIN
BZ
BEXPC
BTIU
CPAS
CA
CASC
CS
CBW
CIDA
CO
CODEL
CI
CROS
CU
CH
CWC
CMGT
CVIS
CDG
CTR
CG
CF
CHIEF
CJAN
CBSA
CE
CY
CB
CW
CM
CHR
CD
COE
CV
COUNTER
CT
CN
CPUOS
CTERR
CVR
CVPR
CDC
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CONS
COM
CACS
CR
CONTROLS
CAN
CACM
COMMERCE
CAMBODIA
CFIS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITES
CONDOLEEZZA
CZ
CTBT
CEN
CLINTON
CFED
CARC
CTM
CARICOM
CSW
CICTE
CYPRUS
CBE
CMGMT
CARSON
CWCM
CIVS
COUNTRYCLEARANCE
CENTCOM
CAPC
COPUOS
CKGR
CITEL
CQ
CITT
CIC
CARIB
CVIC
CAFTA
CVISU
CDB
CEDAW
CNC
CJUS
COMMAND
CENTER
COL
CAJC
CONSULAR
CLMT
CBC
CIA
CNARC
CIS
CEUDA
CHINA
CAC
CL
DR
DJ
DEMOCRATIC
DEMARCHE
DOMESTIC
DISENGAGEMENT
DB
DA
DHS
DAO
DCM
DAVID
DO
DEAX
DEFENSE
DEA
DTRO
DPRK
DOC
DTRA
DK
DAC
DOD
DRL
DRC
DCG
DE
DOT
DEPT
DOE
DS
DKEM
ECON
ETTC
EFIS
ETRD
EC
EMIN
EAGR
EAID
EFIN
EUN
ECIN
EG
EWWT
EINV
ENRG
ELAB
EPET
EIND
EN
EAIR
EUMEM
ECPS
ES
EI
ELTN
ET
EZ
EU
ER
EINT
ENGR
ECONOMIC
ENIV
EFTA
ETRN
EMS
EUREM
EPA
ESTH
EEB
EET
ENV
EAG
EXIM
ECTRD
ELNT
ENVIRONMENT
ECA
EAP
EINDIR
ETR
ECONOMY
ETRC
ELECTIONS
EICN
EXPORT
EARG
EGHG
EID
ETRO
EINF
EAIDHO
ECIP
EENV
EURM
EPEC
ERNG
ENERG
EIAD
EXBS
ED
EREL
ELAM
EK
EWT
ENGRD
EDEV
ECE
ENGY
EXIMOPIC
ETRDEC
ECCT
EUR
ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID
EFI
ECOSOC
EXTERNAL
ESCAP
ETCC
EENG
ERA
ENRD
ECLAC
ETRAD
EBRD
ENVR
ECONENRG
ELTNSNAR
ELAP
EPIT
EDUC
EAIDXMXAXBXFFR
EETC
EIVN
EDRC
EGOV
ETRA
EAIDRW
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ESA
ETRDGK
ENVI
ELN
EPRT
EPTED
ERTD
EUM
EAIDS
EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM
EDU
EV
EAIDAF
EDA
EPREL
EINVEFIN
EAGER
ETMIN
EUCOM
ECCP
EIDN
EINVKSCA
ENNP
EFINECONCS
ETC
EAIRASECCASCID
EINN
ETRP
ECONOMICS
ENERGY
EIAR
EINDETRD
ECONEFIN
EURN
ETRDEINVTINTCS
EFIM
ETIO
EATO
EIPR
EINVETC
ETTD
ETDR
EIQ
ECONCS
ENRGIZ
EAIG
ENTG
EUC
ERD
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECUN
FR
FI
FOREIGN
FARM
FIR
FAO
FK
FARC
FAS
FJ
FREEDOM
FAC
FINANCE
FBI
FTAA
FM
FCS
FAA
FORCE
FDA
FTA
FT
FCSC
FMGT
FINR
FIN
FDIC
FOR
FOI
FO
FMLN
FISO
GM
GERARD
GT
GA
GG
GR
GTIP
GH
GZ
GE
GB
GY
GAZA
GJ
GEORGE
GOI
GCC
GMUS
GI
GLOBAL
GV
GC
GL
GOV
GKGIC
GF
GWI
GIPNC
GUTIERREZ
GTMO
GANGS
GAERC
GUILLERMO
GASPAR
HR
HA
HYMPSK
HO
HK
HUMAN
HU
HN
HHS
HURI
HUD
HUMRIT
HUMANITARIAN
HUMANR
HL
HSTC
HILLARY
HCOPIL
HADLEY
HOURANI
HI
HUM
HEBRON
HUMOR
IZ
IN
IAEA
IS
IMO
ILO
IR
IC
IT
ITU
ID
IV
IMF
IBRD
IWC
ICAO
ICRC
INF
IO
IPR
ISO
IK
ISRAELI
IQ
ICES
IDB
INFLUENZA
IRAQI
ISCON
IGAD
IRAN
ITALY
IRAQ
ICTY
ICTR
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IQNV
IADB
INTERNAL
INMARSAT
IRDB
ILC
INCB
INRB
ICJ
ISRAEL
INR
IEA
ISPA
ICCAT
IOM
ITRD
IHO
IL
IFAD
ITRA
IDLI
ISCA
INL
INRA
INTELSAT
ISAF
ISPL
IRS
IEF
ITER
INDO
IIP
IND
IEFIN
IACI
IAHRC
INNP
IA
INTERPOL
IFIN
ISSUES
IZPREL
IRAJ
IF
ITPHUM
ITA
IP
IRPE
IDA
ISLAMISTS
ITF
INRO
IBET
IDP
IRC
KMDR
KPAO
KOMC
KNNP
KFLO
KDEM
KSUM
KIPR
KFLU
KE
KCRM
KJUS
KAWC
KZ
KSCA
KDRG
KCOR
KGHG
KPAL
KTIP
KMCA
KCRS
KPKO
KOLY
KRVC
KVPR
KG
KWBG
KTER
KS
KN
KSPR
KWMN
KV
KTFN
KFRD
KU
KSTC
KSTH
KISL
KGIC
KSEP
KFIN
KTEX
KTIA
KUNR
KCMR
KCIP
KMOC
KTDB
KBIO
KBCT
KMPI
KSAF
KACT
KFEM
KPRV
KPWR
KIRC
KCFE
KRIM
KHIV
KHLS
KVIR
KNNNP
KCEM
KLIG
KIRF
KNUP
KSAC
KNUC
KPGOV
KTDD
KIDE
KOMS
KLFU
KNNC
KMFO
KSEO
KJRE
KJUST
KMRS
KSRE
KGIT
KPIR
KPOA
KUWAIT
KIVP
KICC
KSCS
KPOL
KSEAO
KRCM
KSCI
KNAP
KGLB
KICA
KCUL
KPRM
KFSC
KQ
KPOP
KPFO
KPALAOIS
KREC
KBWG
KR
KTTB
KNAR
KCOM
KESS
KINR
KOCI
KWN
KCSY
KREL
KTBT
KFTN
KW
KRFD
KFLOA
KHDP
KNEP
KIND
KHUM
KSKN
KOMO
KDRL
KTFIN
KSOC
KPO
KGIV
KSTCPL
KSI
KPRP
KFPC
KNNB
KNDP
KICCPUR
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KDMR
KFCE
KIMMITT
KMCC
KMNP
KSEC
KOMCSG
KGCC
KRAD
KCRP
KAUST
KWAWC
KCHG
KRDP
KPAS
KTIAPARM
KPAOPREL
KWGB
KIRP
KMIG
KLAB
KSEI
KHSA
KNPP
KPAONZ
KWWW
KGHA
KY
KCRIM
KCRCM
KGCN
KPLS
KIIP
KPAOY
KTRD
KTAO
KJU
KBTS
KWAC
KFIU
KNNO
KPAI
KILS
KPA
KRCS
KWBGSY
KNPPIS
KNNPMNUC
KNPT
KERG
KLTN
KPREL
KTLA
KO
KAWK
KVRP
KAID
KX
KENV
KWCI
KNPR
KCFC
KNEI
KFTFN
KTFM
KCERS
KDEMAF
KMEPI
KEMS
KBTR
KEDU
KIRL
KNNR
KMPT
KPDD
KPIN
KDEV
KFRP
KTBD
KMSG
KWWMN
KWBC
KA
KOM
KWNM
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KRGY
KNNF
KICR
KIFR
KWMNCS
KPAK
KDDG
KCGC
KID
KNSD
KMPF
KWMM
MARR
MX
MASS
MOPS
MNUC
MCAP
MTCRE
MRCRE
MTRE
MASC
MY
MK
MG
MU
MILI
MO
MZ
MEPP
MCC
MEDIA
MOPPS
MI
MAS
MW
MP
MEPN
MV
MD
MR
MC
MCA
MT
MIL
MARITIME
MOPSGRPARM
MAAR
MOOPS
ML
MA
MN
MNUCPTEREZ
MTCR
MUNC
MPOS
MONUC
MGMT
MURRAY
MACP
MINUSTAH
MCCONNELL
MGT
MNUR
MF
MEPI
MOHAMMAD
MAR
MAPP
MNU
MFA
MTS
MLS
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MED
MNVC
MIK
MBM
MILITARY
MAPS
MARAD
MDC
MACEDONIA
MASSMNUC
MUCN
MQADHAFI
MPS
NZ
NATO
NI
NO
NU
NG
NL
NPT
NS
NA
NP
NASA
NSF
NEA
NANCY
NSG
NRR
NATIONAL
NMNUC
NC
NSC
NAS
NARC
NELSON
NATEU
NDP
NIH
NK
NIPP
NR
NERG
NSSP
NE
NTDB
NT
NEGROPONTE
NGO
NATOIRAQ
NAR
NZUS
NCCC
NH
NAFTA
NEW
NRG
NUIN
NOVO
NATOPREL
NV
NICHOLAS
NPA
NSFO
NW
NORAD
NPG
NOAA
OPRC
OPDC
OTRA
OECD
OVIP
OREP
ODC
OIIP
OAS
OSCE
OPIC
OMS
OFDP
OFDA
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OSCI
OM
OPAD
ODPC
OIC
ODIP
OPPI
ORA
OCEA
OREG
OMIG
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXP
OPEC
OFPD
OAU
OCII
OIL
OVIPPRELUNGANU
OSHA
OPCD
OPCR
OF
OFDPQIS
OSIC
OHUM
OTR
OBSP
OGAC
OESC
OVP
ON
OES
OTAR
OCS
PREL
PGOV
PARM
PINR
PHUM
PM
PREF
PTER
PK
PINS
PBIO
PHSA
PE
PBTS
PA
PL
POL
PAK
POV
POLITICS
POLICY
PO
PRELTBIOBA
PKO
PIN
PNAT
PU
PGOVPREL
PALESTINIAN
PTERPGOV
PELOSI
PAS
PP
PTEL
PROP
PRELAF
PRHUM
PRE
PUNE
PIRF
PVOV
PROG
PERSONS
PROV
PKK
PRGOV
PH
PLAB
PDEM
PCI
PRL
PRM
PINSO
PERM
PETR
PPAO
PERL
PBS
PETERS
PRELBR
PCON
POLITICAL
PMIL
POLM
PKPA
PNUM
PLO
PTERM
PJUS
PARMP
PNIR
PHUMKPAL
PG
PREZ
PGIC
PAO
PROTECTION
PRELPK
PGOVENRG
PATTY
PSOC
PARTIES
PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ
PMIG
PAIGH
PARK
PETER
PHUS
PKPO
PGOVECON
POUS
PMAR
PWBG
PAR
PGOVGM
PHUH
PTE
PY
POLUN
PDOV
PGOVSOCI
PGOVPM
PRELEVU
PGOR
PBTSRU
PHUMA
PHUMR
PPD
PGV
PRAM
PARMS
PINL
PSI
PKPAL
PPA
PTERE
PGOF
PINO
PREO
PHAS
PAC
PRESL
PORG
PS
PGVO
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PINT
PRELP
PREFA
PNG
PTBS
PFOR
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PREK
PHJM
POLINT
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PECON
PEACE
PROCESS
PLN
PEDRO
PF
PGPV
PCUL
PGGV
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGIV
PHUMPREL
POGOV
PEL
PBT
PAMQ
PINF
PSEPC
POSTS
PAHO
PHUMPGOV
PGOC
PNR
RS
RP
RU
RW
RFE
RCMP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
REFORM
RO
ROW
ROBERT
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RELATIONS
RAY
ROBERTG
RIGHTS
RM
RATIFICATION
RREL
RBI
RICE
ROOD
REL
RODHAM
RGY
RUEHZO
RELIGIOUS
RELFREE
RUEUN
RELAM
RSP
RF
REO
REGIONAL
RUPREL
RI
REMON
RPEL
RSO
SCUL
SENV
SOCI
SZ
SNAR
SO
SP
SU
SY
SI
SMIG
SYR
SA
SW
SF
SR
SYRIA
SNARM
START
SPECIALIST
SG
SNIG
SCI
SGWI
SE
SIPDIS
SANC
SELAB
SN
SETTLEMENTS
SCIENCE
SENVENV
SENS
SPCE
SPAS
SECURITY
SENC
SOCIETY
SOSI
SENVEAGREAIDTBIOECONSOCIXR
SEN
SPECI
ST
SL
SENVCASCEAIDID
SC
SECRETARY
STR
SNA
SOCIS
SADC
SEP
SK
SHUM
SYAI
SMIL
STEPHEN
SNRV
SKCA
SENSITIVE
SECI
SCUD
SCRM
SGNV
SECTOR
SAARC
SENVSXE
SWMN
STEINBERG
SOPN
SOCR
SCRS
SWE
SARS
SNARIZ
SUDAN
SENVQGR
SAN
SM
SFNV
SSA
SPCVIS
SOFA
SCULKPAOECONTU
SENVKGHG
SHI
SEVN
SH
SNARCS
SNARN
SIPRS
TBIO
TW
TRGY
TSPA
TU
TPHY
TI
TX
TH
TIP
TSPL
TNGD
TZ
TS
TC
TK
TURKEY
TERRORISM
TPSL
TINT
TRSY
TERFIN
TPP
TT
TECHNOLOGY
TE
TAGS
TRAFFICKING
TJ
TN
TO
TD
TP
TREATY
TR
TA
TIO
TECH
TF
TRAD
TNDG
TWI
TPSA
TWL
TAUSCHER
TRBY
TL
TV
THPY
TSPAM
TREL
TRT
TNAR
TFIN
TWCH
THOMMA
THOMAS
TERROR
TRY
TBID
UK
UNESCO
UNSC
UNGA
UN
US
UZ
USEU
UG
UP
UNAUS
UNMIK
USTR
UY
USUN
UNEP
UNDC
UV
UNPUOS
UNSCR
USAID
UNODC
UNRCR
UNHCR
UNDP
UNCRIME
UA
UNHRC
UNRWA
UNO
UNCND
UNCHR
USAU
UNICEF
USPS
UNOMIG
UNESCOSCULPRELPHUMKPALCUIRXFVEKV
UR
UNFICYP
UNCITRAL
UNAMA
UNVIE
USTDA
USNC
UNCSD
USCC
UNEF
UNGAPL
USSC
UNMIC
UNTAC
UNCLASSIFIED
USDA
UNCTAD
USGS
UNFPA
UNSE
USOAS
UE
UAE
UNCHS
UNDESCO
UNC
UNSCS
UKXG
UNGACG
UNHR
UNBRO
UNCHC
UNFCYP
UNIDROIT
WHTI
WIPO
WTRO
WHO
WTO
WMO
WFP
WEET
WS
WE
WA
WHA
WBG
WILLIAM
WI
WSIS
WCL
WEBZ
WZ
WW
WWBG
WMD
WWT
WMN
WWARD
WITH
WTRQ
WCO
WEU
WB
WBEG
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 07PARIS634, UNESCO REFORM: SECRETARIAT AND EXPERTS SPLIT ON WAY FORWARD
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07PARIS634.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
07PARIS634 | 2007-02-16 16:45 | 2011-08-24 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED | Embassy Paris |
null
Lucia A Keegan 02/21/2007 09:25:09 AM From DB/Inbox: Lucia A Keegan
Cable
Text:
UNCLAS PARIS 00634
SIPDIS
cxparis:
ACTION: UNESCO
INFO: ECON AMBU AMB AMBO POL DCM SCI
DISSEMINATION: UNESCOX
CHARGE: PROG
APPROVED: AMB: LVOLIVER
DRAFTED: SCI: NCOOPER
CLEARED: DCM: AKOSS
VZCZCFRI486
RR RUEHC
DE RUEHFR #0634/01 0471645
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 161645Z FEB 07
FM AMEMBASSY PARIS
TO SECSTATE WASHDC 5005
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 04 PARIS 000634
SIPDIS
FROM USMISSION UNESCO PARIS
FOR OES - ANDREW REYNOLDS, ANTOINETTE CONDO, BARRIE RIPIN, CHRISTINE
DAWSON
FOR IO - JIM DUFTY
DEPARTMENT PASS NSF FOR ROSE GOMBAY
DEPARTMENT PASS OSTP FOR GENE WHITNEY
DEPARTMENT PASS USGS FOR VERNE SCHNEIDER, MATTHEW LARSEN
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: UNESCO SCI SENV AORC EAID
SUBJECT: UNESCO REFORM: SECRETARIAT AND EXPERTS SPLIT ON WAY FORWARD
FOR ONGOING SCIENCES REVIEW
¶1. Summary: In recent weeks, there have been a number of meetings
relating to the ongoing review of the Natural Sciences and Social
and Human Sciences sectors. The panel itself met January 9-12.
During that week, the Indian Ambassador held a January 10 dinner
where guests included some panel experts and members of the
Secretariat. In addition, Ambassador Oliver organized a January 11
SIPDIS
evening meeting to which she invited like-minded ambassadors and
panel experts to discuss the review process. Following the panel's
meeting, on January 18, the Geneva Group of donor countries met with
the ADGs for both the Natural Sciences and Social and Human Sciences
sectors; the sciences review was a topic of discussion. And, at the
January 19 Executive Board question and answer session, Director
General Matsuura and Deputy Director General Barbosa responded to
queries on this subject.
¶2. At the January 18 meeting of the Geneva Group, ADG for Social
Sciences Sane said that the panel was on a consensual track that
would enable it to conclude its report soon. (ADG Sane's remarks to
the Geneva Group were part of his campaign to maintain the status
quo and with it, his own position, an effort buttressed by the
January 10 dinner hosted by the Indian Ambassador.) At his January
19 question and answer session with the Executive Board, the
Director General and Deputy Director General Matsuura said that the
review panel is on its way to concluding a draft report; DDG Barbosa
outlined a number of recommendations that he said the panel had
endorsed. But in fact, this version of the state of play differs
from that described by four expert panel members at the January 11
meeting the Ambassador hosted. At this meeting, the experts said
that they need more time to consider recommendations to reform the
two sectors; they reported considerable pressure from the "internal"
(secretariat) members of the panel to complete their work in time
for findings to be integrated into the new Medium-Term Strategy, to
be adopted at the October 2007 General Conference. The experts
received needed encouragement to take an independent stance in favor
of reform from the ambassadors present. To allow the panel time to
finish its work, the ambassadors expressed a willingness to consider
the possibility of not adopting a new Medium-Term Strategy at the
2007 General Conference.
¶3. On January 12, the last day of the meeting of the experts'
panel, Deputy Director General Barbosa pressed the panel to work to
the deadline: a final report due in advance of the April Executive
Board, with conclusions to be folded into the new Medium Term
Strategy to be adopted at the October General Conference. However,
the outside experts expressed continuing frustration with the lack
of serious discussion of recommendations that had been proposed, and
at the lack of consensus. While the committee had come to agreement
on a vision for UNESCO science and on an overall strategic planning
approach, several members, except France and the UK, felt that the
draft C-4 and C-5 documents were not central to the charge of the
Committee and that too much time had been spent discussing them, and
not enough time discussing and debating the recommendations. Not
until 1400 on Friday (when only the external experts from France,
UK, Norway, Morocco, Panama, India, and the US remained), were
recommendations put on the table. The external experts also
expressed frustration at the overall process, and concern that they
lacked independence and were being pressed to endorse an agenda
developed by the Secretariat. The panel members decided to set up a
separate drafting team, led by the expert from Morocco and including
the experts from France and Norway, to develop their report. Only
after much discussion did the Committee agree to include Barbosa on
the writing team. However, they felt that a consensus report would
require additional deliberation, even recommending that there be at
least one more meeting of the full review panel. End Summary.
ADGs Say that the Review Process is on Track...
¶4. At the January 18 Geneva Group meeting, the ADGs for the Natural
Sciences and Social and Human Sciences sectors were the special
guests. (Note: Both of them are "internal" members of the review
panel, as are DDG Barbosa and IOC Executive Secretary Bernal. End
Note) On the sciences review, ADG Erdelen claimed that the panel had
reached tentative conclusions. Their report, still a work in
progress, will be ready in mid-February, Erdelen said. One of its
important elements will be a "vision going beyond the Medium-Term
Strategy time frame." This report will also address the issue of
the intergovernmental programs, and sunset clauses. According to
ADG Sane, the panel's most recent meeting finished on a note of
consensus; he said that DDG Barbosa would draft the panel's report,
with "certain recommendations going to the DG." Sane stressed that
as the Executive Board had already agreed on certain proposals for
the C4/C5, the DG will have to "balance" the recommendations of the
committee in order to present something "acceptable" to the April
2007 Executive Board. Sane reported that the panel had agreed on a
vision for the sciences, derived from UNESCO's constitution, that
promotes peace and poverty reduction, and as lesser priorities,
sustainable development and the dialogue among civilizations.
Future programs will be evaluated against these criteria. According
to Sane, panelists also stressed the role of scientists in capacity
building in developing countries to help emerging economies; they
also advocated that all sciences programs should aim at developing
educational materials for universities.
¶5. Queried by Ambassador Oliver on whether there is consensus
within the panel, Assistant Director General for Social Sciences
Sane portrayed the review process as on track. Pressed by
Ambassador Oliver on his comment that DDG Barbosa would draft the
report, Sane said that in fact the Secretariat would provide a draft
to panel members, reporting that the experts had formed a drafting
group. The report must be ready by mid-February, in time for the
Executive Board. Then there will be a "back and forth between the
Executive Board and the review committee to get it right before the
General Conference."
¶6. One Geneva Group member noted that Erdelen seemed much more
forward leaning than Sane with regard to the review process.
Erdelen stressed that he had already taken steps to address some of
the panel's concerns, for example those regarding the lack of
visibility of UNESCO's natural sciences programs. Sane, on the
other hand, indicated that he could not be responsible for reporting
the actual impact of his sector's programs, saying that this lay
beyond his control. And, Sane - evoking an absurdly long list of
new programs that he claimed the panelists had endorsed -- took care
to lay down a marker that the member states would have the last say
on the panel's report.
...While Building Support for the Status Quo
¶7. Sane's presentation to the Geneva Group was part of a campaign
that he has launched to preserve his position within UNESCO. This
was apparent at a dinner organized by the Indian Ambassador,
ostensibly in honor of the Indian member of the sciences review
panel. In fact, it was a chance for the influential ambassador to
stress her support for Sane - and for the continued independence of
his sector -- to the other guests, who included DDG Barbosa, and the
UK, U.S., and French experts on the review panel. Ambassador Oliver
was the only other Ambassador included in the event.
¶8. In a disturbing aside, the Indian Ambassador remarked that the
experts would submit their report to delegations, and amend it based
on their comments. Ambassador Oliver stressed that the role of the
experts was to give member states their best ideas; although member
states would of course react to these ideas, the experts should not
change them in response to the opinions of the delegations.
DG Matsuura and DDG Barbosa Also Say Review On Track
¶9. Queried by member states at the January 19 question and answer
session, DG Matsuura said that the sciences review panel had
endorsed key elements of the draft Medium-Term Strategy for the
sectors, notably the need for more intersectoral work. In his
response, DDG Barbosa indicated that the panel had finished Phase 2,
where it had "provided the DG with recommendations to be taken into
consideration for the C4 and C5 (Medium Term Strategy and Draft
Program and Budget)." He said that the panel would prepare a report
that would be submitted to the April Executive Board. But he said
that the panel's work may need to be extended to include a third
phase, lasting from the April Executive Board to the October General
Conference, in order to "prepare the organization to implement the
new C4 and C5." Barbosa highlighted new ideas that he said had been
endorsed by the experts. In addition to intersectorality, these
"new avenues" included: increased focus on the interfaces between
science and culture and between science and education; dialogue
between knowledge systems; more focus on higher education; and
energy. The goal is to ensure that all programs contribute to the
fight against poverty. The panel's other recommendations include
reorientation of the intergovernmental programs, and the adoption of
a road map for the next 20 years in science. Barbosa declared that
adopting the panel's recommendations would enable UNESCO to assume
its role as "the leading organization for science within the UN
system." Barbosa said that he did not want to go into more detail
so as to preserve some suspense for the April Executive Board.
U.S. Mission Rallies Support for Reform
¶10. But in fact, this account of the panel's work differs from
information revealed by expert panel members at the January 11
meeting the Ambassador hosted. This meeting was attended by the
ambassadors of the UK, Canada, and Japan and by the deputy permanent
delegate of Norway, as well as by the review panel experts from the
UK, Norway, the U.S. and Morocco (US Mission science officer, note
taker). Ambassador Oliver began by briefing the ambassadors, the UK
and Canadian ambassadors having only recently arrived at UNESCO.
She highlighted a series of questions: What is the role of this
expert panel, and how can its independence be guaranteed? Is the
October 2007 deadline for adoption of the Medium-Term strategy still
feasible, given that the panel had reportedly not completed its
task, and there is an ongoing current of other UNESCO reform
initiatives? Given the growing continuum between the social
sciences and the natural sciences, does it make sense to maintain
two separate sectors at UNESCO? The Norwegian permanent delegate
suggested that the General Conference could simply adopt a concise
road map to guide the work of the secretariat as it continued its
work on the Medium-Term Strategy until 2009. He said he thought
that a merger of the two sectors would make sense, given increased
synergies between the two disciplines. The Canadian ambassador
posited that a weak report supporting the status quo would be worse
than no report. And, if the panel could not present a strong set of
recommendations in time for integration into the Medium-Term
Strategy, the General Conference would not be an appropriate
last-minute negotiating venue. He opined that, based on his past UN
experience, the General Conference was not in fact obliged to adopt
a new medium-term strategy at its next meeting.
¶11. The Norwegian expert arrived first, and expressed concerns that
he said had led him to attempt to withdraw twice from the panel; the
other experts echoed these concerns as they joined the conversation.
The panel had only recently began to consider possible
recommendations, having devoted much time in the first months on
"hearings" meant to familiarize the experts with UNESCO. This
exercise precluded real interchange among the experts, who had only
recently learned to work together. All of the experts expressed
surprise at the inclusion of members of the secretariat on the
review panel, saying that this contradicted established principles
of independence. In practice, these "internal" members, with the
exception of IOC Executive Secretary Patricio Bernal, tended to be
resistant to change. The experts from Norway and Morocco stressed
that they believed that the experts should not have devoted so much
time to reviewing the draft C-4 and C-5 (medium-term strategies and
program and budgets) documents, with the UK expert demurring,
seconded by the UK ambassador; they and the Japanese ambassador
stressed the need for specific recommendations from the panel.
Despite these concerns, the experts present agreed that they had
made a breakthrough at that day's meeting, when Norway and Morocco
had commandeered the chair to outline a "matrix" of criteria to
evaluate programs. But more time was needed to complete the task.
¶12. In light of the concerns voiced by the experts, the Japanese
ambassador expressed the view that the panel needed to continue its
work, perhaps with reconfigured leadership. When queried, he said
that he would need to seek guidance on whether he could support
postponing adoption of a new Medium-Term Strategy. But he also
stressed the importance of reaching out to other member states in
support of these ideas. The Moroccan expert struck an upbeat note,
saying that with more time and sharpened working methods, the panel
could make substantial progress.
¶13. Heartened by the support expressed by the ambassadors, the
experts concluded the evening by strategizing for the final day of
the review panel's meeting. The Norwegian deputy permanent delegate
stressed that the ambassador's meeting had been "crucial" in
plotting the way forward for the review process. (Comment: Still,
one question raised earlier by the Norwegian expert remained
pertinent -- would other experts on the panel be willing to take a
stand in favor of a serious effort at reform, or might they succumb
to pressure from their delegations favoring the status quo? End
Comment.)
Experts Panel Asserts Need for Consensus on Recommendations
¶14. Although initially hopeful to complete their review in the
schedule outlined by the Secretariat, by this meeting the outside
experts had only recently begun to work well together and make real
progress. Although not all the outside experts continue to be
actively engaged in the process (some have not participated, even
via email, for several months), those that are expressed hope that
they are on-track to make a significant and lasting contribution to
UNESCO science, if allowed adequate time to complete their work.
They cited detailed findings, an agreed upon vision, and well
thought out framework for strategic planning, but no detailed
discussion of the recommendations. The US representative put back
on the table several recommendations that had not been discussed at
all. Other recommendations had been discussed, but no consensus had
been reached. The committee established a separate and independent
(consisting of external experts, and led by the Moroccan member)
drafting group to begin work on a consensus report, but after much
discussion agreed that Barbosa should also work with the writing
group. Allowing for time to discuss the issues and reach consensus,
this report should be completed in the April/May timeframe - any
less time would not be adequate to deliver a substantive report.
¶15. Comment: The expert panelists were clearly frustrated by the
timetable imposed by the secretariat, and by the secretariat's role
in the review. Of course, in pressing for closure, the secretariat
is implementing the timetable endorsed by the 2005 General
Conference; participation of the secretariat in the panel's work
might also be viewed as a means of getting "buy-in" from the sectors
under review. But it is clear now that the timetable for the
panel's work is not realistic. We are pleased that the experts
refused to be rushed along, and that we gained agreement from some
like-minded ambassadors that the experts should be given time to
complete the job, including possibly by reconsidering the deadline
for adoption of the medium-term strategy. This was just a start.
The question of postponing adoption of the new Medium-Term Strategy
was pressed further at the DG's question and answer session,
reported septel. End Comment.
Koss