

Currently released so far... 51122 / 251,287
Articles
Brazil
Sri Lanka
United Kingdom
Sweden
00. Editorial
United States
Latin America
Egypt
Jordan
Yemen
Thailand
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
2011/05/18
2011/05/19
2011/05/20
2011/05/21
2011/05/22
2011/05/23
2011/05/24
2011/05/25
2011/05/26
2011/05/27
2011/05/28
2011/05/29
2011/05/30
2011/05/31
2011/06/01
2011/06/02
2011/06/03
2011/06/04
2011/06/05
2011/06/06
2011/06/07
2011/06/08
2011/06/09
2011/06/10
2011/06/11
2011/06/12
2011/06/13
2011/06/14
2011/06/15
2011/06/16
2011/06/17
2011/06/18
2011/06/19
2011/06/20
2011/06/21
2011/06/22
2011/06/23
2011/06/24
2011/06/25
2011/06/26
2011/06/27
2011/06/28
2011/06/29
2011/06/30
2011/07/01
2011/07/02
2011/07/04
2011/07/05
2011/07/06
2011/07/07
2011/07/08
2011/07/10
2011/07/11
2011/07/12
2011/07/13
2011/07/14
2011/07/15
2011/07/16
2011/07/17
2011/07/18
2011/07/19
2011/07/20
2011/07/21
2011/07/22
2011/07/23
2011/07/25
2011/07/27
2011/07/28
2011/07/29
2011/07/31
2011/08/01
2011/08/02
2011/08/03
2011/08/05
2011/08/06
2011/08/07
2011/08/08
2011/08/09
2011/08/10
2011/08/11
2011/08/12
2011/08/13
2011/08/15
2011/08/16
2011/08/17
2011/08/18
2011/08/19
2011/08/21
2011/08/22
2011/08/23
2011/08/24
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Antananarivo
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Alexandria
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embasy Bonn
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Brazzaville
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangui
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Belfast
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Cotonou
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chiang Mai
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Chengdu
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
DIR FSINFATC
Consulate Dusseldorf
Consulate Durban
Consulate Dubai
Consulate Dhahran
Embassy Guatemala
Embassy Grenada
Embassy Georgetown
Embassy Gaborone
Consulate Guayaquil
Consulate Guangzhou
Consulate Guadalajara
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Hong Kong
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kolonia
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Krakow
Consulate Kolkata
Consulate Karachi
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Lusaka
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Lome
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy Libreville
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Leipzig
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Mission Geneva
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Mogadishu
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maseru
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Merida
Consulate Melbourne
Consulate Matamoros
Consulate Marseille
Embassy Nouakchott
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Nuevo Laredo
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Consulate Nagoya
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Praia
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Moresby
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Podgorica
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Hillah
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Surabaya
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy Tirana
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
Consulate Thessaloniki
USUN New York
USMISSION USTR GENEVA
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Mission CD Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
UN Rome
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vientiane
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AMGT
ASEC
AEMR
AR
APECO
AU
AORC
ADANA
AJ
AF
AFIN
AMED
AS
AM
ABLD
AFFAIRS
AMB
APER
ACOA
AND
AA
AE
AADP
AID
AO
AL
AG
AORD
ADM
AINF
AINT
ASEAN
AORG
ABT
APEC
AY
ASUP
ARF
AGOA
AVIAN
ATRN
ANET
AGIT
ASECVE
ABUD
AODE
ALOW
ADB
AN
ADPM
ASPA
ARABL
AFSN
AZ
AC
AIAG
AFSI
ASCE
ASIG
ACABQ
ADIP
AFGHANISTAN
AROC
ADCO
ACOTA
ANARCHISTS
AMEDCASCKFLO
AK
ARABBL
ASCH
ANTITERRORISM
AGRICULTURE
AOCR
ARR
ASSEMBLY
AORCYM
AFPK
ACKM
AGMT
AEC
APRC
AIN
AFPREL
ASFC
ASECTH
AFSA
AINR
AOPC
AFAF
AFARI
AX
ASECAF
ASECAFIN
AT
AFZAL
APCS
AGAO
AIT
ARCH
AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL
AMEX
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AORCD
AVIATION
ARAS
AINFCY
ACBAQ
AOPR
AREP
AOIC
ASEX
ASEK
AER
AGR
AMCT
AVERY
APR
AEMRS
AFU
AMG
ATPDEA
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AORL
ACS
AMCHAMS
AECL
AUC
ACAO
BA
BR
BB
BG
BEXP
BY
BRUSSELS
BU
BD
BTIO
BK
BL
BE
BMGT
BO
BM
BX
BN
BWC
BBSR
BTT
BC
BH
BILAT
BUSH
BHUM
BT
BTC
BMENA
BOND
BAIO
BP
BF
BRPA
BURNS
BUT
BBG
BCW
BOEHNER
BOL
BASHAR
BIDEN
BFIN
BZ
BEXPC
BTIU
CPAS
CA
CASC
CS
CBW
CIDA
CO
CODEL
CI
CROS
CU
CH
CWC
CMGT
CVIS
CDG
CTR
CG
CF
CHIEF
CJAN
CBSA
CE
CY
CB
CW
CM
CHR
CD
COE
CV
COUNTER
CT
CN
CPUOS
CTERR
CVR
CVPR
CDC
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CONS
COM
CACS
CR
CONTROLS
CAN
CACM
COMMERCE
CAMBODIA
CFIS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITES
CONDOLEEZZA
CZ
CTBT
CEN
CLINTON
CFED
CARC
CTM
CARICOM
CSW
CICTE
CYPRUS
CBE
CMGMT
CARSON
CWCM
CIVS
COUNTRYCLEARANCE
CENTCOM
CAPC
COPUOS
CKGR
CITEL
CQ
CITT
CIC
CARIB
CVIC
CAFTA
CVISU
CDB
CEDAW
CNC
CJUS
COMMAND
CENTER
COL
CAJC
CONSULAR
CLMT
CBC
CIA
CNARC
CIS
CEUDA
CHINA
CAC
CL
DR
DJ
DEMOCRATIC
DEMARCHE
DOMESTIC
DISENGAGEMENT
DB
DA
DHS
DAO
DCM
DAVID
DO
DEAX
DEFENSE
DEA
DTRO
DPRK
DOC
DTRA
DK
DAC
DOD
DRL
DRC
DCG
DE
DOT
DEPT
DOE
DS
DKEM
ECON
ETTC
EFIS
ETRD
EC
EMIN
EAGR
EAID
EFIN
EUN
ECIN
EG
EWWT
EINV
ENRG
ELAB
EPET
EIND
EN
EAIR
EUMEM
ECPS
ES
EI
ELTN
ET
EZ
EU
ER
EINT
ENGR
ECONOMIC
ENIV
EFTA
ETRN
EMS
EUREM
EPA
ESTH
EEB
EET
ENV
EAG
EXIM
ECTRD
ELNT
ENVIRONMENT
ECA
EAP
EINDIR
ETR
ECONOMY
ETRC
ELECTIONS
EICN
EXPORT
EARG
EGHG
EID
ETRO
EINF
EAIDHO
ECIP
EENV
EURM
EPEC
ERNG
ENERG
EIAD
EXBS
ED
EREL
ELAM
EK
EWT
ENGRD
EDEV
ECE
ENGY
EXIMOPIC
ETRDEC
ECCT
EUR
ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID
EFI
ECOSOC
EXTERNAL
ESCAP
ETCC
EENG
ERA
ENRD
ECLAC
ETRAD
EBRD
ENVR
ECONENRG
ELTNSNAR
ELAP
EPIT
EDUC
EAIDXMXAXBXFFR
EETC
EIVN
EDRC
EGOV
ETRA
EAIDRW
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ESA
ETRDGK
ENVI
ELN
EPRT
EPTED
ERTD
EUM
EAIDS
EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM
EDU
EV
EAIDAF
EDA
EPREL
EINVEFIN
EAGER
ETMIN
EUCOM
ECCP
EIDN
EINVKSCA
ENNP
EFINECONCS
ETC
EAIRASECCASCID
EINN
ETRP
ECONOMICS
ENERGY
EIAR
EINDETRD
ECONEFIN
EURN
ETRDEINVTINTCS
EFIM
ETIO
EATO
EIPR
EINVETC
ETTD
ETDR
EIQ
ECONCS
ENRGIZ
EAIG
ENTG
EUC
ERD
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECUN
FR
FI
FOREIGN
FARM
FIR
FAO
FK
FARC
FAS
FJ
FREEDOM
FAC
FINANCE
FBI
FTAA
FM
FCS
FAA
FORCE
FDA
FTA
FT
FCSC
FMGT
FINR
FIN
FDIC
FOR
FOI
FO
FMLN
FISO
GM
GERARD
GT
GA
GG
GR
GTIP
GH
GZ
GE
GB
GY
GAZA
GJ
GEORGE
GOI
GCC
GMUS
GI
GLOBAL
GV
GC
GL
GOV
GKGIC
GF
GWI
GIPNC
GUTIERREZ
GTMO
GANGS
GAERC
GUILLERMO
GASPAR
HR
HA
HYMPSK
HO
HK
HUMAN
HU
HN
HHS
HURI
HUD
HUMRIT
HUMANITARIAN
HUMANR
HL
HSTC
HILLARY
HCOPIL
HADLEY
HOURANI
HI
HUM
HEBRON
HUMOR
IZ
IN
IAEA
IS
IMO
ILO
IR
IC
IT
ITU
ID
IV
IMF
IBRD
IWC
ICAO
ICRC
INF
IO
IPR
ISO
IK
ISRAELI
IQ
ICES
IDB
INFLUENZA
IRAQI
ISCON
IGAD
IRAN
ITALY
IRAQ
ICTY
ICTR
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IQNV
IADB
INTERNAL
INMARSAT
IRDB
ILC
INCB
INRB
ICJ
ISRAEL
INR
IEA
ISPA
ICCAT
IOM
ITRD
IHO
IL
IFAD
ITRA
IDLI
ISCA
INL
INRA
INTELSAT
ISAF
ISPL
IRS
IEF
ITER
INDO
IIP
IND
IEFIN
IACI
IAHRC
INNP
IA
INTERPOL
IFIN
ISSUES
IZPREL
IRAJ
IF
ITPHUM
ITA
IP
IRPE
IDA
ISLAMISTS
ITF
INRO
IBET
IDP
IRC
KMDR
KPAO
KOMC
KNNP
KFLO
KDEM
KSUM
KIPR
KFLU
KE
KCRM
KJUS
KAWC
KZ
KSCA
KDRG
KCOR
KGHG
KPAL
KTIP
KMCA
KCRS
KPKO
KOLY
KRVC
KVPR
KG
KWBG
KTER
KS
KN
KSPR
KWMN
KV
KTFN
KFRD
KU
KSTC
KSTH
KISL
KGIC
KSEP
KFIN
KTEX
KTIA
KUNR
KCMR
KCIP
KMOC
KTDB
KBIO
KBCT
KMPI
KSAF
KACT
KFEM
KPRV
KPWR
KIRC
KCFE
KRIM
KHIV
KHLS
KVIR
KNNNP
KCEM
KLIG
KIRF
KNUP
KSAC
KNUC
KPGOV
KTDD
KIDE
KOMS
KLFU
KNNC
KMFO
KSEO
KJRE
KJUST
KMRS
KSRE
KGIT
KPIR
KPOA
KUWAIT
KIVP
KICC
KSCS
KPOL
KSEAO
KRCM
KSCI
KNAP
KGLB
KICA
KCUL
KPRM
KFSC
KQ
KPOP
KPFO
KPALAOIS
KREC
KBWG
KR
KTTB
KNAR
KCOM
KESS
KINR
KOCI
KWN
KCSY
KREL
KTBT
KFTN
KW
KRFD
KFLOA
KHDP
KNEP
KIND
KHUM
KSKN
KOMO
KDRL
KTFIN
KSOC
KPO
KGIV
KSTCPL
KSI
KPRP
KFPC
KNNB
KNDP
KICCPUR
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KDMR
KFCE
KIMMITT
KMCC
KMNP
KSEC
KOMCSG
KGCC
KRAD
KCRP
KAUST
KWAWC
KCHG
KRDP
KPAS
KTIAPARM
KPAOPREL
KWGB
KIRP
KMIG
KLAB
KSEI
KHSA
KNPP
KPAONZ
KWWW
KGHA
KY
KCRIM
KCRCM
KGCN
KPLS
KIIP
KPAOY
KTRD
KTAO
KJU
KBTS
KWAC
KFIU
KNNO
KPAI
KILS
KPA
KRCS
KWBGSY
KNPPIS
KNNPMNUC
KNPT
KERG
KLTN
KPREL
KTLA
KO
KAWK
KVRP
KAID
KX
KENV
KWCI
KNPR
KCFC
KNEI
KFTFN
KTFM
KCERS
KDEMAF
KMEPI
KEMS
KBTR
KEDU
KIRL
KNNR
KMPT
KPDD
KPIN
KDEV
KFRP
KTBD
KMSG
KWWMN
KWBC
KA
KOM
KWNM
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KRGY
KNNF
KICR
KIFR
KWMNCS
KPAK
KDDG
KCGC
KID
KNSD
KMPF
KWMM
MARR
MX
MASS
MOPS
MNUC
MCAP
MTCRE
MRCRE
MTRE
MASC
MY
MK
MG
MU
MILI
MO
MZ
MEPP
MCC
MEDIA
MOPPS
MI
MAS
MW
MP
MEPN
MV
MD
MR
MC
MCA
MT
MIL
MARITIME
MOPSGRPARM
MAAR
MOOPS
ML
MA
MN
MNUCPTEREZ
MTCR
MUNC
MPOS
MONUC
MGMT
MURRAY
MACP
MINUSTAH
MCCONNELL
MGT
MNUR
MF
MEPI
MOHAMMAD
MAR
MAPP
MNU
MFA
MTS
MLS
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MED
MNVC
MIK
MBM
MILITARY
MAPS
MARAD
MDC
MACEDONIA
MASSMNUC
MUCN
MQADHAFI
MPS
NZ
NATO
NI
NO
NU
NG
NL
NPT
NS
NA
NP
NASA
NSF
NEA
NANCY
NSG
NRR
NATIONAL
NMNUC
NC
NSC
NAS
NARC
NELSON
NATEU
NDP
NIH
NK
NIPP
NR
NERG
NSSP
NE
NTDB
NT
NEGROPONTE
NGO
NATOIRAQ
NAR
NZUS
NCCC
NH
NAFTA
NEW
NRG
NUIN
NOVO
NATOPREL
NV
NICHOLAS
NPA
NSFO
NW
NORAD
NPG
NOAA
OPRC
OPDC
OTRA
OECD
OVIP
OREP
ODC
OIIP
OAS
OSCE
OPIC
OMS
OFDP
OFDA
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OSCI
OM
OPAD
ODPC
OIC
ODIP
OPPI
ORA
OCEA
OREG
OMIG
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXP
OPEC
OFPD
OAU
OCII
OIL
OVIPPRELUNGANU
OSHA
OPCD
OPCR
OF
OFDPQIS
OSIC
OHUM
OTR
OBSP
OGAC
OESC
OVP
ON
OES
OTAR
OCS
PREL
PGOV
PARM
PINR
PHUM
PM
PREF
PTER
PK
PINS
PBIO
PHSA
PE
PBTS
PA
PL
POL
PAK
POV
POLITICS
POLICY
PO
PRELTBIOBA
PKO
PIN
PNAT
PU
PGOVPREL
PALESTINIAN
PTERPGOV
PELOSI
PAS
PP
PTEL
PROP
PRELAF
PRHUM
PRE
PUNE
PIRF
PVOV
PROG
PERSONS
PROV
PKK
PRGOV
PH
PLAB
PDEM
PCI
PRL
PRM
PINSO
PERM
PETR
PPAO
PERL
PBS
PETERS
PRELBR
PCON
POLITICAL
PMIL
POLM
PKPA
PNUM
PLO
PTERM
PJUS
PARMP
PNIR
PHUMKPAL
PG
PREZ
PGIC
PAO
PROTECTION
PRELPK
PGOVENRG
PATTY
PSOC
PARTIES
PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ
PMIG
PAIGH
PARK
PETER
PHUS
PKPO
PGOVECON
POUS
PMAR
PWBG
PAR
PGOVGM
PHUH
PTE
PY
POLUN
PDOV
PGOVSOCI
PGOVPM
PRELEVU
PGOR
PBTSRU
PHUMA
PHUMR
PPD
PGV
PRAM
PARMS
PINL
PSI
PKPAL
PPA
PTERE
PGOF
PINO
PREO
PHAS
PAC
PRESL
PORG
PS
PGVO
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PINT
PRELP
PREFA
PNG
PTBS
PFOR
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PREK
PHJM
POLINT
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PECON
PEACE
PROCESS
PLN
PEDRO
PF
PGPV
PCUL
PGGV
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGIV
PHUMPREL
POGOV
PEL
PBT
PAMQ
PINF
PSEPC
POSTS
PAHO
PHUMPGOV
PGOC
PNR
RS
RP
RU
RW
RFE
RCMP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
REFORM
RO
ROW
ROBERT
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RELATIONS
RAY
ROBERTG
RIGHTS
RM
RATIFICATION
RREL
RBI
RICE
ROOD
REL
RODHAM
RGY
RUEHZO
RELIGIOUS
RELFREE
RUEUN
RELAM
RSP
RF
REO
REGIONAL
RUPREL
RI
REMON
RPEL
RSO
SCUL
SENV
SOCI
SZ
SNAR
SO
SP
SU
SY
SI
SMIG
SYR
SA
SW
SF
SR
SYRIA
SNARM
START
SPECIALIST
SG
SNIG
SCI
SGWI
SE
SIPDIS
SANC
SELAB
SN
SETTLEMENTS
SCIENCE
SENVENV
SENS
SPCE
SPAS
SECURITY
SENC
SOCIETY
SOSI
SENVEAGREAIDTBIOECONSOCIXR
SEN
SPECI
ST
SL
SENVCASCEAIDID
SC
SECRETARY
STR
SNA
SOCIS
SADC
SEP
SK
SHUM
SYAI
SMIL
STEPHEN
SNRV
SKCA
SENSITIVE
SECI
SCUD
SCRM
SGNV
SECTOR
SAARC
SENVSXE
SWMN
STEINBERG
SOPN
SOCR
SCRS
SWE
SARS
SNARIZ
SUDAN
SENVQGR
SAN
SM
SFNV
SSA
SPCVIS
SOFA
SCULKPAOECONTU
SENVKGHG
SHI
SEVN
SH
SNARCS
SNARN
SIPRS
TBIO
TW
TRGY
TSPA
TU
TPHY
TI
TX
TH
TIP
TSPL
TNGD
TZ
TS
TC
TK
TURKEY
TERRORISM
TPSL
TINT
TRSY
TERFIN
TPP
TT
TECHNOLOGY
TE
TAGS
TRAFFICKING
TJ
TN
TO
TD
TP
TREATY
TR
TA
TIO
TECH
TF
TRAD
TNDG
TWI
TPSA
TWL
TAUSCHER
TRBY
TL
TV
THPY
TSPAM
TREL
TRT
TNAR
TFIN
TWCH
THOMMA
THOMAS
TERROR
TRY
TBID
UK
UNESCO
UNSC
UNGA
UN
US
UZ
USEU
UG
UP
UNAUS
UNMIK
USTR
UY
USUN
UNEP
UNDC
UV
UNPUOS
UNSCR
USAID
UNODC
UNRCR
UNHCR
UNDP
UNCRIME
UA
UNHRC
UNRWA
UNO
UNCND
UNCHR
USAU
UNICEF
USPS
UNOMIG
UNESCOSCULPRELPHUMKPALCUIRXFVEKV
UR
UNFICYP
UNCITRAL
UNAMA
UNVIE
USTDA
USNC
UNCSD
USCC
UNEF
UNGAPL
USSC
UNMIC
UNTAC
UNCLASSIFIED
USDA
UNCTAD
USGS
UNFPA
UNSE
USOAS
UE
UAE
UNCHS
UNDESCO
UNC
UNSCS
UKXG
UNGACG
UNHR
UNBRO
UNCHC
UNFCYP
UNIDROIT
WHTI
WIPO
WTRO
WHO
WTO
WMO
WFP
WEET
WS
WE
WA
WHA
WBG
WILLIAM
WI
WSIS
WCL
WEBZ
WZ
WW
WWBG
WMD
WWT
WMN
WWARD
WITH
WTRQ
WCO
WEU
WB
WBEG
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 07AITTAIPEI1988, MEDIA REACTION: TAIWAN'S UN REFERENDUM
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07AITTAIPEI1988.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
07AITTAIPEI1988 | 2007-08-29 10:52 | 2011-08-23 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED | American Institute Taiwan, Taipei |
VZCZCXYZ0009
RR RUEHWEB
DE RUEHIN #1988/01 2411052
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 291052Z AUG 07
FM AIT TAIPEI
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 6585
INFO RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 7182
RUEHHK/AMCONSUL HONG KONG 8438
UNCLAS AIT TAIPEI 001988
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
DEPARTMENT FOR INR/R/MR, EAP/TC, EAP/PA, EAP/PD - NIDA EMMONS
DEPARTMENT PASS AIT/WASHINGTON
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: OPRC KMDR KPAO TW
SUBJECT: MEDIA REACTION: TAIWAN'S UN REFERENDUM
¶1. Summary: Taiwan's major Chinese- and English-language dailies
August 29 gave significant reporting and editorial coverage to U.S.
Deputy Secretary of State John Negroponte's exclusive interview with
the Hong Kong-based Phoenix TV on Taiwan's UN referendum Monday.
Both the centrist, KMT-leaning "China Times" and the pro-unification
"United Daily News," as well as the three English-language dailies
-- "Taipei Times," "China Post," and "Taiwan News" -- all
front-paged Negroponte's remarks that the push for the UN referendum
is akin to a step toward Taiwan independence and is thus "a
mistake." All the papers also ran the response by Taiwan Foreign
Minister James Huang, who voiced "deep regret" over Negroponte's
remarks. The pro-unification "United Daily News" ran an exclusive
banner headline on page three that said "'Opposing Taiwan's UN
Referendum,' [China's Taiwan Affairs Office Director] Chen Yun-lin
Is Scheduled to Visit the United States in September."
¶2. In terms of editorials and commentaries, the "Free Talk" column
in the pro-independence "Liberty Times" criticized U.S. Deputy
Secretary of State John Negroponte's remarks and said he has let
SIPDIS
down American ancestors who sacrificed their lives in the U.S. war
of independence. A separate "Liberty Times" analysis interpreted
Negroponte's remarks as Washington joining hands with Beijing to
intimidate Taiwan. An editorial in the mass-circulation "Apple
Daily" said Negroponte's interview reflected Washington's upset and
desperation against President Chen Shui-bian. An editorial in the
centrist, KMT-leaning "China Times" chimed in by saying that
Negroponte's remarks signified that the United States has picked a
tune with regard to Taiwan's UN referendum. A "United Daily News"
editorial lashed out at President Chen for his push for the UN
referendum and called Negroponte's remarks an "ultimatum" for
Taiwan. A separate "United Daily News" analysis tossed off the
question as to whether there is a "next step" for Washington to deal
with Taiwan's UN referendum. An editorial in the conservative,
pro-unification, English-language "China Post," on the other hand,
suggested that Taiwan focus on joining smaller world organizations
such as the International Monetary Fund. End summary.
A) "Have the American Superiors Forgot Their Origin?"
The "Free Talk" column in the pro-independence "Liberty Times"
[circulation: 720,000] wrote (8/29):
"... Mounting voices are heard in the international community
opposing Taiwan's bid to join the UN, and it is not surprising at
all, since this is just a reflection of the reality of international
politics. What one can hardly imagine is that the United States has
unexpectedly joined the opposition camp, and it has played the role
of vanguard, with an attitude more proactive than that of China's.
"The United States has downgraded its courtesy treatment for
A-Bian's transit for this particular reason in an attempt to
humiliate him deliberately. But it seems that Washington still
finds it unsatisfactory, so it had Deputy Secretary of State John
Negroponte spout rhetoric on TV, openly opposing Taiwan's plan to
hold a referendum on its UN bid under the name 'Taiwan' and calling
the move a step towards a declaration of Taiwan independence. Even
though Taiwan, as a small country, cannot afford to offend, nor dare
talk back to, the official remarks of this superior U.S. official,
he should engage in introspection and ask himself: How in the world
is he able to face the ancestors who sacrificed their lives in the
U.S. war of independence? ..."
B) "U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Should Listen to Taiwan's Voices
Cried out by 'Chthonic' Band"
Washington correspondent Nadia Tsao noted in the pro-independence
"Liberty Times" [circulation: 720,000] (8/29):
"Immediately following Chinese President Hu Jintao's recent public
announcement that the only task of the People's Liberation Army is
to fight Taiwan, U.S. Deputy Secretary of State John Negroponte
warned on Hong Kong-based Phoenix TV that Taiwan's UN referendum is
[a step towards] an alteration of the status quo and towards a
declaration of independence. For the Taiwan people, Washington
seems to be joining hands with Beijing to intimidate Taiwan.
"Negroponte emphasized that he was talking about this issue in the
context of the solid friendship between the United States and
Taiwan. But even so, following mounting public opinion supporting
Taiwan's UN bid, one cannot help but feel concerned about
Washington's approach -- namely, whether the United States is trying
to replace Beijing as an unwelcome voice in the campaign leading up
to Taiwan's elections [next year], or even to [give] certain Taiwan
political figures in Taiwan [an opportunity] to operate in reverse
by playing the anti-U.S. card. ..."
C) "A-Bian Toying with the Americans"
The mass-circulation "Apple Daily" [circulation: 530,000]
editorialized (8/29):
"The more the United States opposes the UN referendum, the more
vigorous A-Bian gets. The United States offered the lowest-ever
courtesy treatment to A-Bian, nearly similar to humiliation, but
A-Bian endured it gladly. For A-Bian during his previous trips to
Central America, the allies were his secondary targets, while
transiting major U.S. cities was his real goal. Now A-Bian has
given up on the United States, just as the United States has given
up on A-Bian. Bilateral relations have entered a new stage.
"The deputy secretary of state of the United States said A-Bian's
push for the UN referendum is 'a step towards a declaration of
independence for Taiwan, towards an alteration of the status quo."
What a great statement! For a long period of time, Taiwan, the
United States and China have each reserved the final say on how to
define so-called 'Taiwan independence.' Washington could deny
China's definition, and for the United States, only its own
definition counts. As long as Washington does not believe Taiwan is
moving toward independence, the United States can disregard it, no
matter how others complain about it. On the surface, this is
strategic ambiguity, but in reality, it is hegemony. Hegemonic
power only cares about and regards its own argument as reasonable;
all it wants is just to hold on firmly to the authority to control
the situation across the Taiwan Strait.
"The U.S. deputy secretary of state's remarks on Taiwan moving
toward independence reflected the United States' upset and
desperation against A-Bian on the one hand, and also the United
States' lack of wisdom. The United States can list plenty of
reasons to oppose [Taiwan's] UN referendum, but it does not
necessarily have to cite the grand [reason of] 'Taiwan
independence.' Using this reason exactly fits China's wishes.
China can now quote the United States as saying that A-Bian is
pushing for Taiwan independence and attempting to alter the status
quo and, as a result, it can take action, and there is no reason for
the United States to intervene. ..."
D) "'Taiwan's UN Bid' Is for Domestic Consumption After All"
The centrist, KMT-leaning "China Times" [circulation: 400,000]
editorialized (8/29):
"... Now the issue of 'Taiwan's UN bid' seems to have fallen into a
dead end on the international stage. It goes without saying that
Taiwan is unable to enter the UN; nonetheless, the president visited
other countries every year giving out a lot of money, but he could
not even get a few sentences [supporting Taiwan's UN bid] included
in the communique Taiwan signed with its allies during the summit.
In addition, U.S. Deputy Secretary of State John Negroponte pointed
out openly yesterday that Taiwan's 'UN referendum' is the first step
towards Taiwan independence. [His statement] signified that the
United States has already picked a tune on this subject. In other
words, when all Taiwan's allies withdraw their support one by one at
a time when the United States openly stated its opposition, will
[Taiwan] be able to continue pushing its 'UN bid?' Following the
repetitive manipulations on 'Taiwan's UN bid' over the past few
years, not only have we not seen more possibilities being exploited,
but we have also seen [Taiwan's] leeway getting smaller and smaller.
Even [Taiwan's] initial diplomatic capital is being eroded rapidly.
In the end, it seems that the only thing Taiwan can do is to
manipulate [the issue] at home for campaigning's sake!"
E) "Ultimatum: Does Taiwan Still Want the United States as Its
Friend?"
The pro-unification "United Daily News" [circulation: 400,000]
editorialized (8/29):
"Prior to Chen Shui-bian's scheduled return to Taiwan from his trip
[to Central America], U.S. Deputy Secretary of State John Negroponte
gave a sincere talk, in which every sentence he said was aimed at
admonishing Chen to stop the 'UN referendum' before it is too late,
not to take the risk of altering the cross-Strait status quo, and
not to toy with the U.S. friendship. In reality, this sounds
exactly like an ultimatum.
"Negroponte put up a higher posture and defined the 'UN referendum'
as 'a step towards a declaration of independence of Taiwan, towards
an alteration of the status quo." Once this 'definition' was made,
it was akin to setting a 'criterion of victory or defeat' for the
confrontation between the United States and Chen. If Washington
allows Chen to push for the 'UN referendum,' it will be like showing
weakness to Chen, sitting idly by and watching him as he pushes for
Taiwan independence and alters the status quo. In contrast, if the
United States does not allow Chen to push for Taiwan independence
and alter the status quo, it has to stop the 'UN referendum.'
Negroponte's remarks were like a showdown with Chen, to see whether
it is Chen or the United States that is able to carry on.
"The fact that Negroponte accepted the interview with Hong
Kong-based Phoenix TV, during which the only topic he spoke about
was [Taiwan's] 'UN referendum,' was, without a doubt, meant to speak
to the ears of the Chinese authorities. China is opposed to 'de
jure Taiwan independence' and 'changes in the status quo.' Now that
Negroponte regards the 'UN referendum' as 'a step towards a
declaration of independence for Taiwan, towards an alteration of the
status quo,' it is akin to showing that the United States has
identified with the red line drawn by China, and that it will hold
onto this 'red line' together with China in terms of the 'UN
referendum.' This paper has long since warned that Chen's
'anti-China' manipulation has transformed into 'anti-U.S.,' and now
the warning has been proved. ...
"The angle that is most noteworthy during the interview was that
Negroponte emphasized the friendship between Taiwan and the United
States at the beginning and end of the interview. He started by
saying that 'Taiwan has no better friend than the United States,'
and that the United States strongly supports Taiwan's democracy and
economy, and it is committed to the defense of Taiwan through the
Taiwan Relations Act. But then he changed his tone by pointing out
from various angles that the 'UN referendum' does not meet Taiwan's
interests; [Negroponte] sounded as if the Taiwan authorities are the
betrayer of its own interests, whereas the United States is the
protector of Taiwan's interests. In this vein, under Negroponte's
structure, the 'UN referendum' that the Taiwan authorities are
pushing is actually 'harmful to Taiwan,' while the United States'
attempt to stop the 'UN referendum' is [out of] its 'love for
Taiwan.' Judging from this, it is evident that the United States
wants to have a dialogue with the Taiwan people via this interview,
in hopes that the Taiwan people will believe that Washington can see
Taiwan's interests more clearly than Chen.
"... The entire interview began with [the sentence that] 'Taiwan has
no better friend than the United States' and ended with
'(maintaining Taiwan-U.S. friendship) has to be done in a serious
and responsible way.' The entire question and answer section was
threaded with two axes -- one is [Washington's] opposition to the
'UN referendum' and the other emphasizes 'Taiwan-U.S. friendship.'
Its overtones were: Does Taiwan still want the United States as its
friend? ...
"Negroponte's 'ultimatum' has pointed out: The United States will
use the matter of whether it can stop the 'UN referendum' to test
the United States' role in the chess game across the Taiwan Strait.
If the United States fails to suppress the UN referendum, [it means
that] it cannot keep Chen under control, and it is therefore unable
to keep the DPP and Taiwan independence under control. In that
vein, it is unable to justify itself to China and is thus unable to
maintain the cross-Strait policy that it 'opposes attempts by either
side [of the Taiwan Strait] to change the status quo unilaterally.'
The criterion to determine the confrontation between the United
States and Chen is exactly that if Chen's 'UN referendum' wins, it
means that Washington's cross-Strait policy of 'opposing attempts to
change the status quo unilaterally' loses!
"While transiting the United States, Chen receives the U.S.
representative in his plane with a 'UN for Taiwan' sticker on his
chest. The move was akin to declaring war against the U.S.
authorities openly. Likewise, the U.S. authorities' move to have
its deputy secretary of state offer the remarks on 'Taiwan's
interests/U.S. friendship' prior to Chen's return to Taiwan can be
viewed as a gesture to meet Chen head-on in battle. ..."
F) "Other Than Making Strongly-worded Remarks, Will the United
States Take the Next Step?"
Washington correspondent Vincent Chang noted in the pro-unification
"United Daily News" [circulation: 400,000] (8/29):
"... The fact that the U.S. government chose to have John Negroponte
step forward to make such remarks almost indicated that the 'Taiwan
authorities' are irresponsible and are 'disturbing the situation
across the Taiwan Strait.' On the one hand, Washington intended to
upgrade the level [of the official] who made the remarks in order to
warn 'the Taiwan authorities,' and on the other hand, it has
upgraded the [level] of the United States' 'crisis warning' in
handling Taiwan's UN referendum.
"The U.S. position of 'not supporting' Taiwan independence but not
stating in public its 'opposition,' either, was originally an
approach made in consideration of the major framework of the
triangular relationship among the United States, China and Taiwan.
Now that the United States has directly defined the single matter of
Taiwan's UN referendum as a move 'toward Taiwan independence that
the United States opposes,' it means that Chen Shui-bian does not
need to declare Taiwan independence; and if the UN referendum is
held, Washington will deem it as a move equivalent to a declaration
of Taiwan independence. As a result, the 'Four Nos' incantation
that Washington has been using to box Chen in will then fall apart!
"Negroponte's remarks were strong enough, but the outside world is
most curious about and observing whether there will be a 'next step'
for the United States. This is a question that Washington often
asks Chen, but the one that should be asked this question is perhaps
the United States itself, which knows nothing but making
strongly-worded remarks."
G) "Fun with Numbers in Quixotic U.N. Bid"
The conservative, pro-unification, English-language "China Post"
[circulation: 30,000] editorialized (8/29):
"... Joining the U.N. without the blessing of China is a virtual
impossibility. Next month a cluster of Taiwan's allies -- including
Gambia, Swaziland, Tuvalu, Belize, Burkina Faso, Honduras, Kiribati,
Malawi, the Marshall Islands, Nauru, Palau, Saint Vincent and the
Grenadines, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Sao Tome and Principe, and the
Solomon Islands -- will try again to place Taiwan's U.N. bid on the
assembly's agenda, though that's as far as it will get. China is a
permanent member of the U.N. Security Council with the power of
final veto. Taiwan's people host many hopes and aspirations for
their country. Some, no doubt, would support a hypothetical
Taiwanese moon landing. But pragmatism and realism is the way of
logic and the way of progress. Instead of the dreamy moon landing,
Taiwan could, if it desired, realistically build satellites or even
a robot space explorer. And instead of the quixotic U.N. bid,
Taiwan should more rightly focus on joining, and actively
participating in, smaller world organizations like the IMF."
WANG