Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 51122 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 05PARIS7223, French press minimizes US offer

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05PARIS7223.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
05PARIS7223 2005-10-21 13:48 2011-08-24 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Paris
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.

211348Z Oct 05
UNCLAS PARIS 007223 
 
SIPDIS 
 
BRUSSELS PASS USEU FOR AGMINCOUNSELOR 
STATE FOR OES; EUR/ERA; 
STATE PASS USTR FOR MURPHY; 
USDA/OS/JOHANNS AND PENN; 
USDA/FAS FOR OA/TERPSTRA/ROBERTS; 
ITP/SHEIKH/HENKE/MACKE/TOM POMEROY/MIKE 
WOOLSEY/GREG YOUNG; 
FAA/SEBRANEK/BLEGGI; 
EU POSTS PASS TO AGRICULTURE AND ECON 
GENEVA FOR USTR (ALLGEIER, SHARK) AND AGRICULTURE 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: EAGR ETRD PGOV FR WTRO EUN INR
SUBJECT: French press minimizes US offer 
 
 
1.  SUMMARY: The French daily paper Le Figaro 
dated October 19, 2005, published an article 
entitled : "America supports its farmers as never 
before" which asserts that despite last week's 
proposal to make deep cuts in domestic support, US 
agriculture would continue to be highly 
distortive. END SUMMARY. 
 
2.   "America supports its farmers as never 
before: While Washington is challenging the EU to 
cut its subsidies, the United States is going to 
beat its 2000 record. 
 
3.   US farmers are rubbing their hands. The USDA 
has just increased its estimates of the volume of 
2005 crops : 2% more for corn and cotton, 4% more 
for soybean. In a few days, the estimates for 
support expenses will logically be increased, 
Three months ago, they amounted to 21.4 billion 
dollars, that is 60% more than last year. 2005 
subsidies could beat their record of 2000, that is 
22.9 billion dollars. 
 
Subsidies threatening African countries 
---------------------------------------- 
 
3.  The most embarrassing is that the two thirds 
of these subsidies could be production subsidies 
which encourage farmers to produce more in order 
to earn more, but which also favor the drop in 
world prices. In order to limit this consequence 
on prices, the EU has already reformed its 
agriculture subsidy system by delinking it from 
production. 
 
4.  The US negotiator, Rob Portman, proposed a few 
days ago, to reduce by 60% the ceiling of US 
subsidies that are distorting world trade. The 
category of subsidies concerned is that of the 
"amber box" in the WTO jargon, those which most 
influence prices. But it seems that proposed cuts 
would be partly compensated for by the use of 
other type of supports, of the "blue box", with 
less pernicious effects because they limit 
production. Up to now, the United States was 
against this type of support to agricultural 
prices. 
 
5.  Ralph Ichter, chairman of Euroconsultants, a 
Washington agency specialized in agricultural 
trade, thinks that present American proposals will 
not prevent the US government from widely 
subsidizing its producers. 
 
6.  So Uncle Sam could spend, with the marketing 
loans, the subsidies that are most distorting 
world trade, 3.4 billion dollars per year to 
support its soybean producers, that is 20% of the 
value of their crops. Corn producers would receive 
2.2 billion dollars, that is 12% of their crops. 
7.  "For the particular case of cotton, adds 
Ichter, authorized subsidies would reach 2.1 
billion dollars, equivalent to 40% of US 
production ! This is huge and is especially 
threatening African countries, in direct 
competition with the few producers located in the 
south of the United States." Moreover, production 
subsidies not defined yet would be added to this 
system." 
 
Stapleton