Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 51122 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 06EFTOPORTMORESBY350, NOTHING FISHY ON THE INDONESIAN BOARDER

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06EFTOPORTMORESBY350.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
06EFTOPORTMORESBY350 2006-08-28 03:05 2011-08-24 01:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Port Moresby
VZCZCXRO2198
RR RUEHPB
DE RUEHPB #0350 2400305
ZNY EEEEE ZZH
R 280305Z AUG 06
FM AMEMBASSY PORT MORESBY
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 4585
INFO RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA 0864
RUEHJA/AMEMBASSY JAKARTA 0073
RUEHPB/AMEMBASSY PORT MORESBY 1999
UNCLAS E F T O PORT MORESBY 000350 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
SIPDIS 
 
FOR EAP/ANP 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: PREL PP ID
SUBJECT: NOTHING FISHY ON THE INDONESIAN BOARDER 
 
1.(U) The shooting of an Indonesian fisherman off the north 
coast of PNG has sparked a number of paranoid press reports on 
alleged Indonesian activity. All evidence we have suggests the 
reports are sourced from either NGOs seeking to draw attention 
to Papuan separatist causes or from others seeking a place in 
the limelight. 
 
2.(U) On August 8, a PNG fisheries patrol accompanied by Defense 
force personnel (PNGDF) encountered eight Indonesian fishermen 
within the 12 nautical mile limit off PNG's north coast.  The 
PNGDF soldiers opened fire, killing one and injuring two others. 
 The balance were taken into custody. 
 
3.(U) There has since been a spate of stories in the local press 
which can only be characterized as paranoid.  Stories of a 
similar nature have been picked up from the Australian media. 
The fishermen have been labeled as Indonesian Intelligence 
officers (Kapassus).  One source listed the fishermen with 
improbable precision as "a commander, a medic, a radioman, a 
signaler and a rifleman plus three Kapassus officers.  Various 
West Papuan groups have warned of large Indonesian troop 
buildups since the incident and of "fears of imminent invasion". 
 The local press picked up a report in the Australian Bulletin 
claiming that Indonesian intelligence is so heavily established 
within PNG that it "virtually runs some towns on the border." 
Also recycled were reports of a senior "Indonesian double agent" 
in the previous PNG government. 
 
4.(SBU) The reports have been roundly denied by the government, 
the Indonesian embassy, and in private by everyone with any 
credibility we have talked to.  The PNGDF lacks the resources to 
regularly patrol Indonesia's border waters. We understand that 
fishing back and forth across the border is relatively common 
and that there may be customary arrangements among traditional 
groups on both sides of the border to this effect. There are 
some legitimate questions about the use of lethal force in such 
a situation.  However, all evidence we have heard portrays as 
balderdash the notion that these fishermen were part of some 
sinister intelligence operation. 
 
FITTS