Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 51122 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 05VIENNA101, EU COMMON POSITION ON CUBA: AUSTRIAN RESPONSE

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05VIENNA101.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
05VIENNA101 2005-01-12 13:12 2011-08-24 01:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Vienna
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS VIENNA 000101 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
 
DEPARTMENT FRO WHA/CCA , EUR/ERA AND EUR/AGS 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: PHUM PREL CU AU EUN
SUBJECT: EU COMMON POSITION ON CUBA: AUSTRIAN RESPONSE 
 
REF: SECSTATE 233497 
 
This message is sensitive but unclassified. 
 
1.  (SBU) Embassy conveyed reftel points to Austrian MFA 
DAS-equivalent for Latin American Kornelia Weihs on January 
10.  Pol Unit Chief followed up with Weihs (who had just 
returned from the COLAT EU working group meeting in Brussels) 
on January 12.  Weihs told us that the Luxembourg Presidency 
had also distributed the U.S. non-paper on the Common 
Position on Cuba at the COLAT meeting, but that the paper had 
arrived too late for member state reps to consider it. 
 
2.  (SBU) Weihs explained that although the December General 
Affairs and External Relations Council (GAERC) had taken a 
decision in principle to suspend some of the measures against 
Cuba, the modalities of this were still to be worked out. 
After the COLAT, the PSC, COREPER, and finally, the January 
31 GAERC would take final action on implementation. 
 
3.  (SBU) Weihs told us that the Cuban government's freeze on 
contacts with EU member state Embassies and the EU Commission 
representation in Havana had led to an unproductive 
stalemate.  EU Member states had therefore settled on a 
suspension of the EU agreed measures until the end of June 
2005 in an attempt to re-start a dialogue with the Cuban 
regime and bring some movement into a stagnant situation. 
The Cuban government then abandoned its divide-and-conquer 
tactics on January 3 by agreeing to renew diplomatic contacts 
with all the EU member state missions and the Commission. 
 
4.  (SBU) However, the release (into house arrest) of 14 
gravely ill detainees had impressed none of the member 
states, Weihs said.  All were convinced that the regime's 
sole motivation was to avoid having any of the dissidents die 
in detention.  The EU was still seeking consensus on how to 
proceed in order to help bring about an improvement in the 
status of the detainees and, generally, to promote democracy 
and human rights in Cuba.  It was up to the Luxembourg 
presidency to propose a common approach at the February 8 
COLAT, when the U.S. paper would also be on the agenda. 
Brown