Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 51122 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 05ANKARA5172, TURKEY VIEW ON BTC SECURITY AND CEYHAN INAUGURATION

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05ANKARA5172.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
05ANKARA5172 2005-09-06 09:06 2011-08-24 01:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Ankara
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS ANKARA 005172 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
 
EUR ALSO FOR DAS BRYZA 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: EPET ENRG PREL TU GG AZ BTC
SUBJECT: TURKEY VIEW ON BTC SECURITY AND CEYHAN INAUGURATION 
 
REF: A. ANKARA 5080 
 
     B. ANKARA 3171 
 
SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED 
 
1.  (SBU) BTC Inauguration at Ceyhan: MFA DDG Energy Mithat 
Rende told Econ Counselor on September 2 that the GOT 
expected the BTC first oil tanker loading at Ceyhan to be 
scheduled for either mid December or March.  He said that 
BP's current forecast for BTC completion estimated end of 
December with risk of slippage if there were further delays 
in wrapping things up in Turkey.  Rende said that the MFA 
strongly opposed a "fake" ceremony; that is, using oil from 
tanker early commissioning, rather than oil that has in fact 
traversed the pipeline.  (Note: per Ref A the GOT Ministry of 
Energy still plans for post-Ramadan November 10, which 
appears disconnected from construction reality for a "real" 
ceremony.  The GOT has sought to nail down a date to 
facilitate high level visitors.  If first oil slipped past 
the new year, MFA appears to support aiming for better 
weather in March for the inauguration.  End Note.)  In a 
separate conversation with EnergyOff, BP confirmed the 
project timing, offering "odds on chance" of first oil before 
year-end.  The BP rep said that operation of only two of 
Turkey's four pump stations would be necessary for the 
initial start-up with reduced flow.  He noted that the latest 
delay was due to difficulties in completing the electronic 
and communication connections between Turkey pump stations 
and the Ceyhan control room.  Finally, the BP rep said that 
the first tanker from Supsa is scheduled to dock at Ceyhan on 
September 8 to fill up one tank for testing and 
pre-commission. 
 
2.  (SBU) BTC Security: The next step in arranging 
three-country security coordination and information 
mechanisms under the BTC Security Protocol is the convening 
of the Joint Committee on Security in Ankara (Ref B). 
According to Rende, the Georgians (heretofore slow in naming 
representatives) had agreed to September 5 (announced in the 
press), but unfortunately the Azeris said they could not meet 
on this date.  Rende said that the mutually satisfactory date 
remained to be determined.  He was sorry that he would not be 
able to attend the EUCOM Caspian Energy Security Conference 
in Garmisch September 26-28, but he said there would be good 
representation from GOT MFA, MENR, and BOTAS to discuss BTC 
security and other issues. 
MCELDOWNEY