Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 51122 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 05PRETORIA424, MINISTER ADDRESSES QUESTIONS SURROUNDING VANS

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05PRETORIA424.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
05PRETORIA424 2005-01-31 15:25 2011-08-24 01:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Pretoria
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS PRETORIA 000424 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPT FOR AF/EPS, AF/S/TCRAIG AND KGAITHER, AND EB/CIP 
COMMERCE FOR 4510/ITA/IEP/ANESA/OA/JDIEMOND 
TREASURY FOR GCHRISTOPULOS, LSTURM, AND AJEWEL 
DEPT PASS USTR FOR PCOLEMAN, WJACKSON AND CHAMILTON 
 
SENSITIVE 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: ECPS ETRD ECON EINT SF
SUBJECT:  MINISTER ADDRESSES QUESTIONS SURROUNDING VANS 
REGULATIONS 
 
REFTEL:   A) PRETORIA 389 
 
          B) 04 PRETORIA 5555 
 
(U) Sensitive but unclassified.  Not for Internet 
distribution.  Please protect accordingly. 
 
1. (U) Minister of Communications Ivy Matsepe-Casaburri 
released a January 30 statement addressing concerns 
surrounding the interpretation of her Ministerial 
Determinations that she released September 3, 2004 regarding 
liberalization. 
 
2.  (U) Casaburri said, "The issue of self provisioning was 
issued in the government's policy determinations only in 
relation to mobile cellular operators in terms of fixed 
links."  She continued that value-added network service 
(VANS) providers could obtain facilities from "any licensed 
operator."  While Casaburri used the same language in her 
"clarification" that she used in the original Ministerial 
Determination, industry analysts understand this to mean 
that VANS will not be allowed to self-provide their own 
infrastructure and will need to procure facilities from a 
licensed operator such as Telkom, the mobile operators, 
Transtel, and others.  Although this is a victory for 
incumbents who argued that VANS could not self-provide, it 
likely avoids litigation on the subject that would have 
delayed implementation of the remaining benefits to VANS. 
 
3.  (U) The Minister also said that government did not 
intend "to license every single activity that can be 
provided by a VANS operator," apparently in response to 
industry requests for greater detail on what a VANS provider 
is and what VANS services would require licenses.  Casaburri 
promised that the imminent Convergence Bill would provide 
certainty to the sector in this regard. 
 
4.  (SBU) COMMENT.  Industry observers are puzzled by the 
chronology of these events.  That the Minister would 
implement Ministerial Determinations to liberalize certain 
telecommunications services just weeks prior to the release 
of Convergence legislation establishing a more liberal 
legislative and regulatory framework is akin to putting the 
cart before the donkey.  In issuing her clarifying 
statement, the Minister did so "against the imperative to 
avoid any delays" and "within the context of regulatory lag" 
in the event of an amendment to the Telecommunications Act, 
leading industry observers to speculate about possible 
delays in the February 1 implementation of her Ministerial 
Determinations.  END COMMENT. 
 
FRAZER