

Currently released so far... 51122 / 251,287
Articles
Brazil
Sri Lanka
United Kingdom
Sweden
00. Editorial
United States
Latin America
Egypt
Jordan
Yemen
Thailand
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
2011/05/18
2011/05/19
2011/05/20
2011/05/21
2011/05/22
2011/05/23
2011/05/24
2011/05/25
2011/05/26
2011/05/27
2011/05/28
2011/05/29
2011/05/30
2011/05/31
2011/06/01
2011/06/02
2011/06/03
2011/06/04
2011/06/05
2011/06/06
2011/06/07
2011/06/08
2011/06/09
2011/06/10
2011/06/11
2011/06/12
2011/06/13
2011/06/14
2011/06/15
2011/06/16
2011/06/17
2011/06/18
2011/06/19
2011/06/20
2011/06/21
2011/06/22
2011/06/23
2011/06/24
2011/06/25
2011/06/26
2011/06/27
2011/06/28
2011/06/29
2011/06/30
2011/07/01
2011/07/02
2011/07/04
2011/07/05
2011/07/06
2011/07/07
2011/07/08
2011/07/10
2011/07/11
2011/07/12
2011/07/13
2011/07/14
2011/07/15
2011/07/16
2011/07/17
2011/07/18
2011/07/19
2011/07/20
2011/07/21
2011/07/22
2011/07/23
2011/07/25
2011/07/27
2011/07/28
2011/07/29
2011/07/31
2011/08/01
2011/08/02
2011/08/03
2011/08/05
2011/08/06
2011/08/07
2011/08/08
2011/08/09
2011/08/10
2011/08/11
2011/08/12
2011/08/13
2011/08/15
2011/08/16
2011/08/17
2011/08/18
2011/08/19
2011/08/21
2011/08/22
2011/08/23
2011/08/24
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Antananarivo
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Alexandria
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embasy Bonn
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Brazzaville
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangui
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Belfast
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Cotonou
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chiang Mai
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Chengdu
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
DIR FSINFATC
Consulate Dusseldorf
Consulate Durban
Consulate Dubai
Consulate Dhahran
Embassy Guatemala
Embassy Grenada
Embassy Georgetown
Embassy Gaborone
Consulate Guayaquil
Consulate Guangzhou
Consulate Guadalajara
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Hong Kong
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kolonia
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Krakow
Consulate Kolkata
Consulate Karachi
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Lusaka
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Lome
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy Libreville
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Leipzig
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Mission Geneva
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Mogadishu
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maseru
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Merida
Consulate Melbourne
Consulate Matamoros
Consulate Marseille
Embassy Nouakchott
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Nuevo Laredo
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Consulate Nagoya
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Praia
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Moresby
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Podgorica
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Hillah
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Surabaya
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy Tirana
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
Consulate Thessaloniki
USUN New York
USMISSION USTR GENEVA
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Mission CD Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
UN Rome
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vientiane
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AMGT
ASEC
AEMR
AR
APECO
AU
AORC
ADANA
AJ
AF
AFIN
AMED
AS
AM
ABLD
AFFAIRS
AMB
APER
ACOA
AND
AA
AE
AADP
AID
AO
AL
AG
AORD
ADM
AINF
AINT
ASEAN
AORG
ABT
APEC
AY
ASUP
ARF
AGOA
AVIAN
ATRN
ANET
AGIT
ASECVE
ABUD
AODE
ALOW
ADB
AN
ADPM
ASPA
ARABL
AFSN
AZ
AC
AIAG
AFSI
ASCE
ASIG
ACABQ
ADIP
AFGHANISTAN
AROC
ADCO
ACOTA
ANARCHISTS
AMEDCASCKFLO
AK
ARABBL
ASCH
ANTITERRORISM
AGRICULTURE
AOCR
ARR
ASSEMBLY
AORCYM
AFPK
ACKM
AGMT
AEC
APRC
AIN
AFPREL
ASFC
ASECTH
AFSA
AINR
AOPC
AFAF
AFARI
AX
ASECAF
ASECAFIN
AT
AFZAL
APCS
AGAO
AIT
ARCH
AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL
AMEX
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AORCD
AVIATION
ARAS
AINFCY
ACBAQ
AOPR
AREP
AOIC
ASEX
ASEK
AER
AGR
AMCT
AVERY
APR
AEMRS
AFU
AMG
ATPDEA
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AORL
ACS
AMCHAMS
AECL
AUC
ACAO
BA
BR
BB
BG
BEXP
BY
BRUSSELS
BU
BD
BTIO
BK
BL
BE
BMGT
BO
BM
BX
BN
BWC
BBSR
BTT
BC
BH
BILAT
BUSH
BHUM
BT
BTC
BMENA
BOND
BAIO
BP
BF
BRPA
BURNS
BUT
BBG
BCW
BOEHNER
BOL
BASHAR
BIDEN
BFIN
BZ
BEXPC
BTIU
CPAS
CA
CASC
CS
CBW
CIDA
CO
CODEL
CI
CROS
CU
CH
CWC
CMGT
CVIS
CDG
CTR
CG
CF
CHIEF
CJAN
CBSA
CE
CY
CB
CW
CM
CHR
CD
COE
CV
COUNTER
CT
CN
CPUOS
CTERR
CVR
CVPR
CDC
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CONS
COM
CACS
CR
CONTROLS
CAN
CACM
COMMERCE
CAMBODIA
CFIS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITES
CONDOLEEZZA
CZ
CTBT
CEN
CLINTON
CFED
CARC
CTM
CARICOM
CSW
CICTE
CYPRUS
CBE
CMGMT
CARSON
CWCM
CIVS
COUNTRYCLEARANCE
CENTCOM
CAPC
COPUOS
CKGR
CITEL
CQ
CITT
CIC
CARIB
CVIC
CAFTA
CVISU
CDB
CEDAW
CNC
CJUS
COMMAND
CENTER
COL
CAJC
CONSULAR
CLMT
CBC
CIA
CNARC
CIS
CEUDA
CHINA
CAC
CL
DR
DJ
DEMOCRATIC
DEMARCHE
DOMESTIC
DISENGAGEMENT
DB
DA
DHS
DAO
DCM
DAVID
DO
DEAX
DEFENSE
DEA
DTRO
DPRK
DOC
DTRA
DK
DAC
DOD
DRL
DRC
DCG
DE
DOT
DEPT
DOE
DS
DKEM
ECON
ETTC
EFIS
ETRD
EC
EMIN
EAGR
EAID
EFIN
EUN
ECIN
EG
EWWT
EINV
ENRG
ELAB
EPET
EIND
EN
EAIR
EUMEM
ECPS
ES
EI
ELTN
ET
EZ
EU
ER
EINT
ENGR
ECONOMIC
ENIV
EFTA
ETRN
EMS
EUREM
EPA
ESTH
EEB
EET
ENV
EAG
EXIM
ECTRD
ELNT
ENVIRONMENT
ECA
EAP
EINDIR
ETR
ECONOMY
ETRC
ELECTIONS
EICN
EXPORT
EARG
EGHG
EID
ETRO
EINF
EAIDHO
ECIP
EENV
EURM
EPEC
ERNG
ENERG
EIAD
EXBS
ED
EREL
ELAM
EK
EWT
ENGRD
EDEV
ECE
ENGY
EXIMOPIC
ETRDEC
ECCT
EUR
ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID
EFI
ECOSOC
EXTERNAL
ESCAP
ETCC
EENG
ERA
ENRD
ECLAC
ETRAD
EBRD
ENVR
ECONENRG
ELTNSNAR
ELAP
EPIT
EDUC
EAIDXMXAXBXFFR
EETC
EIVN
EDRC
EGOV
ETRA
EAIDRW
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ESA
ETRDGK
ENVI
ELN
EPRT
EPTED
ERTD
EUM
EAIDS
EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM
EDU
EV
EAIDAF
EDA
EPREL
EINVEFIN
EAGER
ETMIN
EUCOM
ECCP
EIDN
EINVKSCA
ENNP
EFINECONCS
ETC
EAIRASECCASCID
EINN
ETRP
ECONOMICS
ENERGY
EIAR
EINDETRD
ECONEFIN
EURN
ETRDEINVTINTCS
EFIM
ETIO
EATO
EIPR
EINVETC
ETTD
ETDR
EIQ
ECONCS
ENRGIZ
EAIG
ENTG
EUC
ERD
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECUN
FR
FI
FOREIGN
FARM
FIR
FAO
FK
FARC
FAS
FJ
FREEDOM
FAC
FINANCE
FBI
FTAA
FM
FCS
FAA
FORCE
FDA
FTA
FT
FCSC
FMGT
FINR
FIN
FDIC
FOR
FOI
FO
FMLN
FISO
GM
GERARD
GT
GA
GG
GR
GTIP
GH
GZ
GE
GB
GY
GAZA
GJ
GEORGE
GOI
GCC
GMUS
GI
GLOBAL
GV
GC
GL
GOV
GKGIC
GF
GWI
GIPNC
GUTIERREZ
GTMO
GANGS
GAERC
GUILLERMO
GASPAR
HR
HA
HYMPSK
HO
HK
HUMAN
HU
HN
HHS
HURI
HUD
HUMRIT
HUMANITARIAN
HUMANR
HL
HSTC
HILLARY
HCOPIL
HADLEY
HOURANI
HI
HUM
HEBRON
HUMOR
IZ
IN
IAEA
IS
IMO
ILO
IR
IC
IT
ITU
ID
IV
IMF
IBRD
IWC
ICAO
ICRC
INF
IO
IPR
ISO
IK
ISRAELI
IQ
ICES
IDB
INFLUENZA
IRAQI
ISCON
IGAD
IRAN
ITALY
IRAQ
ICTY
ICTR
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IQNV
IADB
INTERNAL
INMARSAT
IRDB
ILC
INCB
INRB
ICJ
ISRAEL
INR
IEA
ISPA
ICCAT
IOM
ITRD
IHO
IL
IFAD
ITRA
IDLI
ISCA
INL
INRA
INTELSAT
ISAF
ISPL
IRS
IEF
ITER
INDO
IIP
IND
IEFIN
IACI
IAHRC
INNP
IA
INTERPOL
IFIN
ISSUES
IZPREL
IRAJ
IF
ITPHUM
ITA
IP
IRPE
IDA
ISLAMISTS
ITF
INRO
IBET
IDP
IRC
KMDR
KPAO
KOMC
KNNP
KFLO
KDEM
KSUM
KIPR
KFLU
KE
KCRM
KJUS
KAWC
KZ
KSCA
KDRG
KCOR
KGHG
KPAL
KTIP
KMCA
KCRS
KPKO
KOLY
KRVC
KVPR
KG
KWBG
KTER
KS
KN
KSPR
KWMN
KV
KTFN
KFRD
KU
KSTC
KSTH
KISL
KGIC
KSEP
KFIN
KTEX
KTIA
KUNR
KCMR
KCIP
KMOC
KTDB
KBIO
KBCT
KMPI
KSAF
KACT
KFEM
KPRV
KPWR
KIRC
KCFE
KRIM
KHIV
KHLS
KVIR
KNNNP
KCEM
KLIG
KIRF
KNUP
KSAC
KNUC
KPGOV
KTDD
KIDE
KOMS
KLFU
KNNC
KMFO
KSEO
KJRE
KJUST
KMRS
KSRE
KGIT
KPIR
KPOA
KUWAIT
KIVP
KICC
KSCS
KPOL
KSEAO
KRCM
KSCI
KNAP
KGLB
KICA
KCUL
KPRM
KFSC
KQ
KPOP
KPFO
KPALAOIS
KREC
KBWG
KR
KTTB
KNAR
KCOM
KESS
KINR
KOCI
KWN
KCSY
KREL
KTBT
KFTN
KW
KRFD
KFLOA
KHDP
KNEP
KIND
KHUM
KSKN
KOMO
KDRL
KTFIN
KSOC
KPO
KGIV
KSTCPL
KSI
KPRP
KFPC
KNNB
KNDP
KICCPUR
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KDMR
KFCE
KIMMITT
KMCC
KMNP
KSEC
KOMCSG
KGCC
KRAD
KCRP
KAUST
KWAWC
KCHG
KRDP
KPAS
KTIAPARM
KPAOPREL
KWGB
KIRP
KMIG
KLAB
KSEI
KHSA
KNPP
KPAONZ
KWWW
KGHA
KY
KCRIM
KCRCM
KGCN
KPLS
KIIP
KPAOY
KTRD
KTAO
KJU
KBTS
KWAC
KFIU
KNNO
KPAI
KILS
KPA
KRCS
KWBGSY
KNPPIS
KNNPMNUC
KNPT
KERG
KLTN
KPREL
KTLA
KO
KAWK
KVRP
KAID
KX
KENV
KWCI
KNPR
KCFC
KNEI
KFTFN
KTFM
KCERS
KDEMAF
KMEPI
KEMS
KBTR
KEDU
KIRL
KNNR
KMPT
KPDD
KPIN
KDEV
KFRP
KTBD
KMSG
KWWMN
KWBC
KA
KOM
KWNM
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KRGY
KNNF
KICR
KIFR
KWMNCS
KPAK
KDDG
KCGC
KID
KNSD
KMPF
KWMM
MARR
MX
MASS
MOPS
MNUC
MCAP
MTCRE
MRCRE
MTRE
MASC
MY
MK
MG
MU
MILI
MO
MZ
MEPP
MCC
MEDIA
MOPPS
MI
MAS
MW
MP
MEPN
MV
MD
MR
MC
MCA
MT
MIL
MARITIME
MOPSGRPARM
MAAR
MOOPS
ML
MA
MN
MNUCPTEREZ
MTCR
MUNC
MPOS
MONUC
MGMT
MURRAY
MACP
MINUSTAH
MCCONNELL
MGT
MNUR
MF
MEPI
MOHAMMAD
MAR
MAPP
MNU
MFA
MTS
MLS
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MED
MNVC
MIK
MBM
MILITARY
MAPS
MARAD
MDC
MACEDONIA
MASSMNUC
MUCN
MQADHAFI
MPS
NZ
NATO
NI
NO
NU
NG
NL
NPT
NS
NA
NP
NASA
NSF
NEA
NANCY
NSG
NRR
NATIONAL
NMNUC
NC
NSC
NAS
NARC
NELSON
NATEU
NDP
NIH
NK
NIPP
NR
NERG
NSSP
NE
NTDB
NT
NEGROPONTE
NGO
NATOIRAQ
NAR
NZUS
NCCC
NH
NAFTA
NEW
NRG
NUIN
NOVO
NATOPREL
NV
NICHOLAS
NPA
NSFO
NW
NORAD
NPG
NOAA
OPRC
OPDC
OTRA
OECD
OVIP
OREP
ODC
OIIP
OAS
OSCE
OPIC
OMS
OFDP
OFDA
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OSCI
OM
OPAD
ODPC
OIC
ODIP
OPPI
ORA
OCEA
OREG
OMIG
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXP
OPEC
OFPD
OAU
OCII
OIL
OVIPPRELUNGANU
OSHA
OPCD
OPCR
OF
OFDPQIS
OSIC
OHUM
OTR
OBSP
OGAC
OESC
OVP
ON
OES
OTAR
OCS
PREL
PGOV
PARM
PINR
PHUM
PM
PREF
PTER
PK
PINS
PBIO
PHSA
PE
PBTS
PA
PL
POL
PAK
POV
POLITICS
POLICY
PO
PRELTBIOBA
PKO
PIN
PNAT
PU
PGOVPREL
PALESTINIAN
PTERPGOV
PELOSI
PAS
PP
PTEL
PROP
PRELAF
PRHUM
PRE
PUNE
PIRF
PVOV
PROG
PERSONS
PROV
PKK
PRGOV
PH
PLAB
PDEM
PCI
PRL
PRM
PINSO
PERM
PETR
PPAO
PERL
PBS
PETERS
PRELBR
PCON
POLITICAL
PMIL
POLM
PKPA
PNUM
PLO
PTERM
PJUS
PARMP
PNIR
PHUMKPAL
PG
PREZ
PGIC
PAO
PROTECTION
PRELPK
PGOVENRG
PATTY
PSOC
PARTIES
PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ
PMIG
PAIGH
PARK
PETER
PHUS
PKPO
PGOVECON
POUS
PMAR
PWBG
PAR
PGOVGM
PHUH
PTE
PY
POLUN
PDOV
PGOVSOCI
PGOVPM
PRELEVU
PGOR
PBTSRU
PHUMA
PHUMR
PPD
PGV
PRAM
PARMS
PINL
PSI
PKPAL
PPA
PTERE
PGOF
PINO
PREO
PHAS
PAC
PRESL
PORG
PS
PGVO
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PINT
PRELP
PREFA
PNG
PTBS
PFOR
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PREK
PHJM
POLINT
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PECON
PEACE
PROCESS
PLN
PEDRO
PF
PGPV
PCUL
PGGV
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGIV
PHUMPREL
POGOV
PEL
PBT
PAMQ
PINF
PSEPC
POSTS
PAHO
PHUMPGOV
PGOC
PNR
RS
RP
RU
RW
RFE
RCMP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
REFORM
RO
ROW
ROBERT
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RELATIONS
RAY
ROBERTG
RIGHTS
RM
RATIFICATION
RREL
RBI
RICE
ROOD
REL
RODHAM
RGY
RUEHZO
RELIGIOUS
RELFREE
RUEUN
RELAM
RSP
RF
REO
REGIONAL
RUPREL
RI
REMON
RPEL
RSO
SCUL
SENV
SOCI
SZ
SNAR
SO
SP
SU
SY
SI
SMIG
SYR
SA
SW
SF
SR
SYRIA
SNARM
START
SPECIALIST
SG
SNIG
SCI
SGWI
SE
SIPDIS
SANC
SELAB
SN
SETTLEMENTS
SCIENCE
SENVENV
SENS
SPCE
SPAS
SECURITY
SENC
SOCIETY
SOSI
SENVEAGREAIDTBIOECONSOCIXR
SEN
SPECI
ST
SL
SENVCASCEAIDID
SC
SECRETARY
STR
SNA
SOCIS
SADC
SEP
SK
SHUM
SYAI
SMIL
STEPHEN
SNRV
SKCA
SENSITIVE
SECI
SCUD
SCRM
SGNV
SECTOR
SAARC
SENVSXE
SWMN
STEINBERG
SOPN
SOCR
SCRS
SWE
SARS
SNARIZ
SUDAN
SENVQGR
SAN
SM
SFNV
SSA
SPCVIS
SOFA
SCULKPAOECONTU
SENVKGHG
SHI
SEVN
SH
SNARCS
SNARN
SIPRS
TBIO
TW
TRGY
TSPA
TU
TPHY
TI
TX
TH
TIP
TSPL
TNGD
TZ
TS
TC
TK
TURKEY
TERRORISM
TPSL
TINT
TRSY
TERFIN
TPP
TT
TECHNOLOGY
TE
TAGS
TRAFFICKING
TJ
TN
TO
TD
TP
TREATY
TR
TA
TIO
TECH
TF
TRAD
TNDG
TWI
TPSA
TWL
TAUSCHER
TRBY
TL
TV
THPY
TSPAM
TREL
TRT
TNAR
TFIN
TWCH
THOMMA
THOMAS
TERROR
TRY
TBID
UK
UNESCO
UNSC
UNGA
UN
US
UZ
USEU
UG
UP
UNAUS
UNMIK
USTR
UY
USUN
UNEP
UNDC
UV
UNPUOS
UNSCR
USAID
UNODC
UNRCR
UNHCR
UNDP
UNCRIME
UA
UNHRC
UNRWA
UNO
UNCND
UNCHR
USAU
UNICEF
USPS
UNOMIG
UNESCOSCULPRELPHUMKPALCUIRXFVEKV
UR
UNFICYP
UNCITRAL
UNAMA
UNVIE
USTDA
USNC
UNCSD
USCC
UNEF
UNGAPL
USSC
UNMIC
UNTAC
UNCLASSIFIED
USDA
UNCTAD
USGS
UNFPA
UNSE
USOAS
UE
UAE
UNCHS
UNDESCO
UNC
UNSCS
UKXG
UNGACG
UNHR
UNBRO
UNCHC
UNFCYP
UNIDROIT
WHTI
WIPO
WTRO
WHO
WTO
WMO
WFP
WEET
WS
WE
WA
WHA
WBG
WILLIAM
WI
WSIS
WCL
WEBZ
WZ
WW
WWBG
WMD
WWT
WMN
WWARD
WITH
WTRQ
WCO
WEU
WB
WBEG
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 10BERLIN166, Germany - REVISED Investment Climate Statement
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #10BERLIN166.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
10BERLIN166 | 2010-02-05 16:41 | 2011-08-24 01:00 | UNCLASSIFIED | Embassy Berlin |
VZCZCXYZ0000
RR RUEHWEB
DE RUEHRL #0166/01 0361641
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 051641Z FEB 10
FM AMEMBASSY BERLIN
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 6499
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHDC
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHINGTON DC
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHINGTON DC
RUEHRC/DEPT OF AGRICULTURE WASHINGTON DC
UNCLAS BERLIN 000166
SIPDIS
DEPT FOR EEB/IFD/OIA
DEPT ALSO FOR USTR
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EINV EFIN ETRD ELAB KTDB PGOV USTR OPIC GM
SUBJECT: Germany - REVISED Investment Climate Statement
2010
REF: 09 STATE 124006
¶1. In response to reftel, the following is the 2010
Investment Climate Statement for Germany. This is the
revised version of the statement. A previous version was
sent on January 15, 2010.
¶2. Begin Text:
GERMANY: 2010 INVESTMENT CLIMATE STATEMENT
------------------------------------------
Indices 2009
Indices - 2009
TI Corruption Perception Index (CPI) - Rank 14 of 180,
CPI 8,0 (7.9 in 2008)
Heritage Economic Freedom Index - Rank 25 of 179, freedom
score 70.5 (-0.1 from 2008)
World Bank Doing Business Index - Rank 25 of 183
MCC Govt Effectiveness - N/A
MCC Rule of Law - N/A
MCC Control of Corruption - N/A
MCC Fiscal Policy - N/A
MCC Trade Policy - N/A
MCC Regulatory Quality - N/A
MCC Business Start Up - N/A
MCC Land Rights Access - N/A
MCC Natural Resource Mgmt - N/A
Openness to Foreign Investment
------------------------------
The German government and industry actively encourage
foreign investment in Germany, and German law provides
foreign investors national treatment. Under German law,
with the exception of some limited provisions in the
Foreign Economic Law (see below), foreign-owned companies
registered in the Federal Republic of Germany as a GmbH
(limited liability company) or an AG (joint stock company)
are treated no differently from German-owned companies.
Germany also treats foreigners equally in privatizations.
There are no special nationality requirements on directors
or shareholders, nor do investors need to register
investment intent with any government entity except in the
case of acquiring a significant stake in a firm in the
defense or encryption industries. The investment-related
problems foreign companies do face are generally the same
as for domestic firms, for example high marginal income
tax rates and labor laws that impede hiring and
dismissals. The German government has begun to address
many of these problem areas through its reform programs.
German courts have a good record in upholding the sanctity
of contracts.
The 1956 U.S.-FRG Treaty of Friendship, Commerce and
Navigation affords U.S. investors national treatment and
provides for the free movement of capital between the U.S.
and Germany. Germany subscribes to the OECD Committee on
Investment and Multinational Enterprises' (CIME) National
Treatment Instrument and the OECD Code on Capital
Movements and Invisible Transactions (CMIT). While
Germany's foreign trade act contains a provision
permitting restrictions on private direct investment flows
for reasons of national security, no such restrictions
have been imposed in practice. In such general cases, the
federal government would first consult with the Bundesbank
and the governments of the federal states. Specific
legislation requiring government screening of foreign
equity acquisitions of 25% or more of German armaments
companies took effect in July 2004. Under the 2004 law,
foreign entities that wish to purchase more than 25%
equity in German manufacturers of armaments or
cryptographic equipment are required to notify the Federal
Economics and Technology Ministry, which then has one
month in which to veto the sale. The transaction is
regarded as approved if the Economics and Technology
Ministry does not react in that time. The German
government expanded the scope of the law in 2005 to
include tank and tracked-vehicle engines.
In 2009, the scope of the foreign trade act was further
expanded when Germany's Cabinet approved an amendment that
requires the German government to examine and potentially
prohibit the acquisition of German companies by non-EU
investors if they intend to buy more than 25% of the
company's shares in cases where a threat to national
security or public order is perceived. The Law entered
into force in spring 2009. According to the Federation of
German Industries (BDI) and the American Chamber of
Commerce in Germany, no foreign companies have complained
so far about difficulties under the amendment.
Germany ranks 14th in the Transparency International
Corruption Perception Index (CPI) that compares 180
countries worldwide (rank 1 being the country with least
corruption).
Conversion and Transfer Policies
As a result of European Economic and Monetary Union (EMU),
the Deutsche Mark (DM) was phased out on January 1, 2002,
and replaced by the euro, which is a freely traded
currency with no restrictions on transfer or conversion
and which is the unit of currency in Germany and more than
20 other European countries. There is no difficulty in
obtaining foreign exchange. There are also no
restrictions on inflows and outflows of funds for
remittances of profits or other purposes.
Expropriation and Compensation
German law provides that private property can be
expropriated for public purposes only in a non-
discriminatory manner and in accordance with established
principles of constitutional and international law. There
is due process and transparency of purpose, and investors
and lenders to expropriated entities receive prompt,
adequate and effective compensation.
Dispute Settlement
Investment disputes concerning U.S. or other foreign
investors and Germany are rare. Germany is a member of
the International Center for the Settlement of Investment
Disputes (ICSID), as well as a member of the 1958 New York
Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign
Arbitral Awards. German courts are fully available for
foreign investors in the event of investment disputes.
The government does not interfere in the court system and
accepts binding arbitration.
Performance Requirements and Incentives
European Union, federal and state authorities offer a
broad range of incentive programs for investors in
Germany. Cash Grants under the Joint Agreement for the
Improvement of Regional Economic Structures is one
available instrument for improving the infrastructure of
regional economies and the economy as a whole - a primary
objective of the German federal and state governments.
A comprehensive package of federal and state investment
incentives, including cash, labor-related, and R&D
incentives, interest-reduced loans, and public guarantees
is available to domestic and foreign investors. In some
cases, there may be performance requirements tied to the
incentive, such as employment creation and maintaining a
certain level of employment for a prescribed length of
time. There are no requirements for local sourcing,
export percentage, or local national ownership. Offsets
have been a part of procurements by some state and local
governments and by the federal government for some defense
procurement, but they are infrequently used at present.
Germany is in compliance with its WTO TRIMS notification.
The government has emphasized investment promotion in the
states of the former East Germany and offers several
programs only in these regions. The major program is the
Investment Allowance Act, which provides tax incentives
for investments in the eastern states in the form of tax-
free cash payments or tax credits. With the beginning of
the new budgetary period of the EU, which started in
January 2007 (and runs through 2013), Germany is to
receive a total of EUR 26.3 billion. The accession of new
EU member countries in 2004 reduced subsidy levels for
Germany beginning in 2007. The German states located in
the former East Germany received the majority of the EU
subsidies allocated to Germany, EUR 15.1 billion, for the
budget period of 2007-2013.
Foreign investors are generally subject to the same
eligibility conditions as German investors for incentive
programs.
Programs in Germany:
-- Investment grants: Cash incentives in the form of non-
repayable grants usually based on investment costs or
assumed wage costs. Incentives vary according to the
economic development level of the region and the overall
investment costs, with up to 30 percent of eligible
expenditures channelled to large enterprises, 40 percent
to medium-sized enterprises and 50 percent to small
enterprises.
-- Credit Programs: loans at below-market interest rates
from the Bank for Reconstruction, the European Recovery
Program, and other programs for small technology firms and
environmental demonstration projects.
-- Public guarantees: Public guarantees for companies
which do not have the collateral that private-sector banks
ordinarily require.
-- Labor incentives: Recruitment support from 800 local
job centers, including free services, training support,
wage subsidies, and on-the-job training. Firms from the
United States and other countries may also participate in
government-funded and/or subsidized research and
development programs, provided that:
-- The company is legally established in Germany;
-- The activity is a long-term operation with significant
R&D capacities;
-- The firm can exploit intellectual property rights
independently of a parent company;
-- Preference is given to locating manufacturing
facilities in Germany for any production resulting from
the research;
-- The sponsored research is performed entirely Germany.
American business representatives generally report that
these formal requirements and the administration of the
programs by German authorities do not constitute barriers
for access to R&D funding.
Foreign investors can obtain more information on
investment conditions and incentives from:
Germany Trade and Invest
The inward investment promotion agency of the Federal
Republic of Germany
Friedrichstrasse 60
10117 Berlin, Germany
Telephone: [49][30] 2000 99 0
Telefax: [49][30] 2000 99 111
www.gtai.com
Germany Trade & Invest
1776 I Street, N.W.
Suite 1000
Washington D.C. 20006
Telephone: 202 629 5711
Telefax: 202 347 7473
www.gtai.com
Germany Trade & Invest
401 N. Michigan Ave, Suite 3330
Chicago, IL 60611-4212
Telephone: 312 377 6131
Telefax: 312 377 6134
www.gtai.com
Germany Trade and Invest
One Embarcadero Center, Suite 1000
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: 415 248 1246
Telefax: 415 627 9169
www.gtai.com
Germany Trade and Invest
75 Broad Street, 21st Floor
New York, NY 10004
Telephone: 212 584 9715
Telefax: 212 262 6449
www.gtai.com
Germany Trade and Invest is the foreign trade and
investment agency of the Federal Republic of Germany,
formed by the merger of Invest in Germany with the German
Office for Foreign Trade in January 2009.
American companies can, with effort, generally obtain the
resident visas and spouse work permits they require to do
business in Germany, but the relevant laws are quite broad
and considerable administrative discretion is exercised in
their application. A number of U.S. states have not yet
concluded reciprocal agreements with the German government
to recognize one another's driver's licenses. As a
result, licenses from those states are not usable in
Germany for longer than six months, whereas licenses from
states that have signed agreements can be converted to
German licenses after six months.
Right to Private Ownership and Establishment
Foreign and domestic entities have the right to establish
and own business enterprises, engage in all forms of
remunerative activity, and acquire and dispose of
interests in business enterprises.
Protection of Property Rights
The German Government adheres to a policy of national
treatment, which considers property owned by foreigners as
fully protected under German law. There is almost no
discrimination against foreign investment and foreign
acquisition, ownership, control or disposal of property or
equity interests, with airline ownership being an
exception based on EU regulations, which require an EU
majority ownership of shares to obtain an operating permit
as an EU airline. In Germany, the concept of mortgages is
subject to a recognized and reliable security. Secured
interests in property, both chattel and real, are
recognized and enforced.
Intellectual property is generally well protected by
German laws. Germany is a member of the World
Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Germany is
also a party to the major international intellectual
property protection agreements: the Bern Convention for
the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works, the Paris
Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property, the
Universal Copyright Convention, the Geneva Phonograms
Convention, the Patent Cooperation Treaty, the Brussels
Satellite Convention, and the Treaty of Rome on
Neighboring Rights.
National treatment is also granted foreign copyright
holders, including remuneration for private recordings.
Under the TRIPS agreement, the federal government also
grants legal protection for practicing U.S. artists
against the commercial distribution of unauthorized live
recordings in Germany. Germany has signed the WIPO
Internet treaties and ratified them in 2003. Foreign and
German rights holders, however, remain critical of
provisions in the German Copyright Act that allow
exceptions for private copies of copyrighted works. Most
rights holder organizations regard German authorities'
enforcement of intellectual property protections as
sufficient, although problems persist due to lenient court
rulings in some cases and the difficulty of combating
piracy of copyrighted works on the Internet.
In 2008, Germany implemented the EU enforcement directive
with a national bill, thereby strengthening the privileges
of rights holders and allowing for improved enforcement
action.
Transparency of Regulatory System
Germany has transparent and effective laws and policies to
promote competition, including anti-trust laws. German
authorities recently lifted many restrictions on store
business hours, which had formerly restrained competition
and business opportunities. There are concerns in Germany
and abroad about the level of regulation prevailing with
regulatory authority dispersed over the federal, state,
and local levels. Many investors consider Germany's
bureaucracy excessive, which has prompted most state
governments to establish investment promotion offices and
investment banks to expedite the process. New rules have
simplified bureaucratic requirements, but industry must
sometimes contend with officials' relative inexperience
with deregulation and lingering pro-regulation attitudes.
In response to the problem, the federal government
continues to reduce bureaucracy. In 2006, the National
Regulatory Control Council was established, tasked with
evaluating policy and assessing the impact of lawmaking.
Based on its findings, the council reports annually and
recommends further measures. The federal government also
set the target of reducing the costs of law-induced
bureaucracy by 25 percent by 2011. The new Economics
Minister Rainer Bruederle (pro-market FDP) seems to be
very interested in reducing the bureaucratic burden and
has moved the section within the Economics Ministry
dealing with bureaucracy reform closer to his own office.
Germany now uses the Standard Cost Model to quantify and
identify bureaucratic costs in every new legislative
proposal. This provides increased transparency about the
amount of time and cost that companies and citizens have
to spend because of bureaucratic requirements. The German
National Regulatory Control Council estimates that
applying the Standard Cost Model has reduced bureaucratic
costs by 3 billion euros in the past two-and-a-half years,
measured against the bureaucratic burden that was in
effect before new, improved legislation.
Laws and regulations in Germany are routinely published in
draft, and public comments are solicited. The legal,
regulatory and accounting systems can be complex but are
transparent and consistent with international norms.
Efficient Capital Markets and Portfolio Investment
Germany has a modern financial market sector but is often
considered "over-banked," as evidenced by on-going
consolidation and low profit margins. The country's so-
called "three-pillar" banking system, made up of private
commercial banks, state-owned and cooperative banks, and
savings banks, survived the global financial crisis, but
pressures to consolidate are increasing. To improve their
international competitiveness, the large privately-owned
banks in particular have launched massive cost-cutting
programs. Regional state-owned banks ("Landesbanken")
were among the hardest hit by the crisis. Their future
seems unclear, as the EU Competition Commissioner has
attached tough downsizing conditions in return for
approving federal and state government bailout packages.
The financial crisis also triggered the take-over of
Dresdner Bank by Commerzbank and that of Post Bank by
Deutsche Bank. This has effectively reduced the number of
top German banks to just two.
In the midst of the financial crisis, the German
government passed a bank rescue plan ("SOFFIN") worth 480
billion euros. The two most prominent recipients of
rescue funds were Commerzbank (its take-over of Dresdner
Bank brought it to the brink of bankruptcy) and Hypo Real
Estate (HRE). In the case of HRE, the government even
departed from its long-standing tradition and nationalized
the bank in order to prevent a breakdown of the German
(and European) covered bond market - which is the backbone
of German real estate financing. The law permitting the
expropriation of HRE was designed for that institution
only and expired in June 2009. There are currently
several court cases pending in which the government action
of "squeezing out" HRE's old owners is being challenged.
One such high-profile case is that of U.S. private equity
firm, JC Flowers, which led a consortium of investors
owning nearly 25 percent of the troubled bank prior to
nationalization. The government argued that without its
actions, HRE would have been insolvent, and owners would
have lost their assets anyway. At 1.30 euros per share,
the German Government paid an estimated 10 cents more than
the actual market value of HRE stock.
Credit is available at market-determined rates to both
domestic and foreign investors, and a variety of credit
instruments are available. Legal, regulatory and
accounting systems are generally transparent and
consistent with international banking norms, but in light
of the current global financial turmoil, Germany is
pushing for even more transparency in international
financial markets. Germany has a universal banking system
that is effectively regulated by federal authorities.
There is currently some concern that the economic crisis
in connection with tougher capital requirements for banks
mandated in the G-20 may cause a shortage of credit in the
German economy. The German government has taken action to
ease the situation through the offer of additional state
financing options through its state lender KfW.
Given the prevailing overall economic conditions, mergers
and acquisitions (M&A) have decreased in recent years in
line with global trends. Prior to the global financial
crisis, Germany had seen an upswing in M&A transactions
due to improved economic conditions, the increased
financial assets of the top 30 companies listed in the
German stock exchange (DAX), and the high value of the
euro. "Cross shareholding" exists among some large German
companies, in particular among banks that hold shares in
large industrial customers. However, Germany's major
banks have been reducing their cross-shareholdings in
recent years.
In response to a 2004 EU directive, the government has
implemented legislation that established new rules to
ensure greater transparency for takeovers. The new law
went into effect in 2006.
In recent years, Germany has implemented a series of laws
to improve its securities trading system, including laws
against insider-trading and the Fourth Financial Market
Promotion Law in 2003. In 2002, a corporate governance
code was adopted, which, while voluntary, requires listed
companies to "comply or explain" why the code or parts
thereof have not been followed. The code is intended to
increase transparency and improve management response to
shareholder concerns. The Finance and Justice Ministries
drew up a ten-point plan in 2003 to improve investor
protection. As a part of that plan, the government tabled
a bill in November 2004 that would (a) increase the
liability of boards of directors for false or misleading
statements; and (b) improve oversight of auditing
operations. The EU's Financial Services Action Plan - an
effort intended to create a more integrated European
financial market by 2005 - has helped stimulate changes in
the German regulatory framework, including adoption of
International Accounting Standards for listed firms and
use of company investment prospects on an EU-wide basis.
In 2008, Germany passed legislation that makes private
equity firms subject to greater transparency rules,
including the publication of a business plan for the
acquired company.
Competition from State Owned Enterprises
State-owned or partially state-owned enterprises still
exist in several sectors. Most importantly in postal
services, railroads, telecommunications and the banking
sector.
Privatization of state-owned utilities has promoted
competition and led to falling prices in some sectors.
Following deregulation of the telecommunications sector in
1998, scores of foreign and domestic companies invested
vast sums in that sector. Since then, former state
monopolist Deutsche Telekom (DT) has lost more than 48% of
the fixed-line market to competitors (while at the same
time profiting from them, as they must lease the last mile
from DT), and it still controls 47% of DSL broadband
connections. The 2003 introduction of call-by-call and
pre-selection in the local loop allowed competitors to
increase their share of the local call market to an
estimated 49% by mid-2006. In June 2004, a new
telecommunications law to implement EU directives entered
into force. The law mandates less regulation in some
areas while giving the regulator new powers to address
abuse of market dominance and ensure competitors' access
to services. A second amendment to the telecommunications
law became effective in early 2007. Aimed at
strengthening consumer rights, it also includes a
controversial component entitling the incumbent to a
regulatory holiday in return for a sizeable investment in
a VDSL network, providing the investment creates a "new
market." The regulator determines the definition of "new
markets" and can subsequently rule on the entitlement to a
regulation-free timeframe. However, in 2009 the European
Court of Justice ruled that the regulatory holiday granted
to DT infringes on European law. The German government
continues to hold a 32% share in DT, although it has
expressed its desire to sell these shares eventually.
Competition has come to the electricity market since 1998,
especially since the German Government began to take
serious measures to open the market. The gas sector has
proved particularly resistant to the 2000 EU Directive to
liberalize the market, but it is opening now. In July
2005, the Regulatory Authority for Telecommunications and
Post (RegTP) became the Federal Network Agency (FNA) and
took over responsibility for gas and electricity network
prices and access. In summer 2006, it began issuing
orders to incumbents in the electricity market to cut
prices. Action against gas suppliers started a year
later. The FNA is currently preparing new regulations to
force pipelines to accept more gas from competitors and
increase cross-border pipeline capacity.
Rising energy prices and rising profits in the energy
sector increased consumer and political pressure on the
industry to contain prices. Legislation to force
utilities to accept new competing power stations into
their nets went into force in 2007 and in 2008 legislation
increased the authority of the Federal Cartel Office
(Bundeskartellamt) in this area. The Cartel Office has
used this new authority to force approximately 30 gas
suppliers to lower their prices and in many cases to repay
customers.
The EU has withdrawn plans to bring charges of price
fixing and territorial demarcation against leading German
energy utilities after two utilities agreed to sell their
long-distance power or gas transmission lines, thereby
submitting to the EU's unbundling demands. Both buyers
are foreign net operators, reflecting that after years of
competitive stagnation, some new foreign competitors have
entered the German power market.
The government partially privatized Deutsche Post (DP) in
November 2000 and is slowly divesting its remaining
shares. It currently holds a 30.5% share in DP. After
successive rounds of liberalization, DP's monopoly on
letter delivery expired on December 31, 2007, with the aim
of full competition in the German postal sector. A new
minimum wage law in the postal sector was regarded by some
competitors, however, as favoring Deutsche Post and as
leading to the demise of several major competitors. DP to
date still enjoys VAT exemption (of 19%) for offering
universal service. However, VAT exemption will likely be
reduced to private individual's letters and light parcels
in July 2010, following a ruling by the European Court of
Justice in late 2009. According to draft legislation,
competitors will also be entitled to VAT exemption if they
offer universal service. Germany's Cartel Office, which
enjoys an excellent international reputation, and
Germany's other regulatory agencies address problems and
settle complaints brought forward by foreign market
entrants and bidders. However, as noted above, German law
and court decisions have limited these agencies'
effectiveness in some areas.
The planned sale to private investors of just under 25% of
the 100% government-owned railway Deutsche Bahn (DB) did
not take place. The government scaled down the original
privatization plan for just below 50% to just below 25%.
The change was largely due to unresolved disputes within
the former CDU/SPD coalition government over the retention
of ownership of both rolling stock and the rail network.
On January 1, 2006, the Federal Network Agency took over
responsibility for access and prices issues regarding
competitors' access to the railroad network. A series of
data privacy scandals forced the resignation of the DB CEO
in 2009, when DB also started to have serious safety
problems with high-speed, freight and Berlin light rail
rolling stock, primarily due to lack of maintenance.
Public and political outrage at the perceived attempt to
cut costs to improve DB's attractiveness for
privatization, but at the expense of safety, has led to
the new coalition government putting the privatization on
ice, officially because of poor market conditions in the
financial crisis. Three different types of banks exist in
Germany: privately-owned banks, state-owned banks
(Landesbanken) and cooperative banks. The Landesbanken
used to have advantages over privately-owned banks in
obtaining credit. Under the pressure of Germany's
privately-owned banks, the EU forced an end to these
advantages in 2005. This means that the Landesbanken can
no longer raise money cheaply with a AAA rating because of
state guarantee. At the moment, foreign banks do not have
to fear any unfair competition from state-owned or
cooperative banks.
Corporate Social Responsibility
The Federal Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs is the
leading ministry for CSR within the German government, and
it is currently developing a national CSR strategy. The
Ministry of Labor has installed a CSR Forum in January
2009 as a platform for dialogue with relevant
stakeholders. The CSR Forum consists of around 40
organizations from business, unions, civil society and
politics. Its task is to develop recommendations for the
Labor Ministry's national CSR Strategy and to participate
in its implementation once the strategy has been adopted.
Because of the restructuring of the Labor Ministry after
the elections, the work of the CSR forum is currently
stalled.
On the business side, the American Chamber of Commerce in
Germany (AmCham Germany) is active in upholding the
standards of social responsibility within the realm of
their members' corporate business. AmCham Germany issues
regular publications on companies' CSR approaches and has
established a committee on corporate social responsibility
as a platform for the exchange of best practices, to
identify trends and to discuss regulatory initiatives.
Political Violence
Political acts of violence against either foreign or
domestic business enterprises are extremely rare.
Isolated cases of violence directed at certain minorities
and asylum seekers have not affected U.S. investments or
investors.
Corruption
Among industrialized countries, Germany ranks in the
middle, according to Transparency International's
corruption indices. The construction sector and public
contracting, in conjunction with undue political party
influence, represent particular areas of continued
concern. Nevertheless, U.S. firms have not identified
corruption as an impediment to investment.
The German government has sought to reduce domestic and
foreign corruption. Strict anti-corruption laws apply to
domestic economic activity, and the laws are enforced.
Germany ratified the 1998 OECD Anti-Bribery Convention in
February 1999, thereby criminalizing bribery of foreign
public officials by German citizens and firms abroad. The
necessary tax reform legislation ending the tax write-off
of bribes in Germany and abroad became law in March 1999.
Germany has signed the UN Anti-Corruption Convention but
has not yet ratified it. The country participates in the
relevant EU anti-corruption measures. Germany has
increased penalties for bribery of German officials, for
corrupt practices between companies, and for price-fixing
by companies competing for public contracts. It has also
strengthened anti-corruption provisions that apply to
support extended by the official export credit agency and
has tightened the rules for public tenders. Most state
governments and local authorities have contact points for
whistle-blowing and provisions for rotating personnel in
areas prone to corruption. Government officials are
forbidden from accepting gifts linked to their jobs.
Opinions differ, however, on the effectiveness of these
steps, particularly in the area of foreign corruption.
German industry - while generally in favor of creating a
central, national-level register of corrupt companies that
would be barred from bidding for public contracts -
refrained from openly calling for its creation out of fear
of an added regulatory burden. Draft legislation to
create such a register passed the lower chamber of the
German Parliament but was blocked by opposition parties in
the upper chamber in 2002. The CDU-SPD Government, which
took power in November 2005, did not include a similar
initiative in its program. Nevertheless, some individual
states maintain their own registers. Transparency
Deutschland, the German Chapter of Transparency
International, sees a national corruption register as one
of its main goals in Germany and a speedy ratification of
the UN Anti-Corruption Convention placing bribery of
parliamentarians on the same level as bribery of public
officials. Federal freedom of information legislation
entered into force in January 2006 but is seen by many as
ineffective. Several states have introduced their own
freedom of information laws. The German government has
successfully prosecuted hundreds of domestic corruption
cases over the years. To date, only a small number of
charges have been filed involving the bribery of foreign
government officials since the 1999 changes in German law
to comply with the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention were
enacted. However, the corruption scandal involving
Siemens AG with its ongoing litigation and fines and the
agreement with the Securities & Exchange Commission on an
$800 million fine focused attention on foreign bribery for
the first time.
Bilateral Investment Agreements
Germany has investment treaties in force with 127
countries and territories. Of these, eight are with
predecessor states and indicated with an asterisk
(including Czechoslovak SFR, Soviet Union, Yugoslavia
[SFRY]). Treaties are in force with the following states:
Afghanistan; Albania; Algeria; Angola; Antigua and
Barbuda; Argentina; Armenia; Azerbaijan, Bangladesh;
Barbados; Belarus; Benin; Bolivia; Bosnia and Herzegovina;
Botswana; Burkina Faso; Brunei; Bulgaria; Burundi;
Cambodia; Cameroon; Cape Verde; Central African Republic;
Chad; Chile; China (People's Republic); Congo (People's
Republic); Congo (Democratic Republic); Costa Rica;
Croatia; Cuba; CSFR**; Czech Republic*; Dominica; Ecuador;
Egypt; El Salvador; Estonia; Ethiopia; Gabon; Georgia;
Ghana; Greece; Guatemala; Guinea; Guyana; Haiti; Honduras;
Hong Kong; Hungary; India; Indonesia; Iran; Ivory Coast;
Jamaica; Jordan; Kazakhstan; Kenya; Republic of Korea;
Kuwait; Kyrgyzstan*; Laos; Latvia; Lebanon; Lesotho;
Liberia; Lithuania; Macedonia; Madagascar; Malaysia; Mali;
Malta; Mauritania; Mauritius; Mexico; Moldova*; Mongolia;
Morocco; Mozambique; Namibia; Nepal; Nicaragua; Niger;
Nigeria; Oman; Pakistan; Panama; Papua New Guinea;
Paraguay; Peru; Philippines; Poland; Portugal; Qatar;
Romania; Russia*; Rwanda; Saudi Arabia; Senegal; Sierra
Leone; Singapore; Slovak Republic*; Slovenia; Somalia;
South Africa; Soviet Union**; Sri Lanka; St. Lucia; St.
Vincent and the Grenadines; Serbia; Sudan; Swaziland;
Syria; Tajikistan*; Tanzania; Thailand; Togo; Tunisia;
Turkey; Turkmenistan; Uganda; Ukraine; United Arab
Emirates; Uruguay; Uzbekistan; Venezuela; Vietnam; Yemen
(Arab. Rep.); Yugoslavia (SFRY)**; Zambia; and Zimbabwe.
(Note: * denotes treaty in force with predecessor state;
** denotes continued application of treaties with former
entities, which has not been taken into account in regard
to the total number of treaties.)
Germany has ratified treaties, which are not yet in force,
with the following countries:
Country -- Signed -- Temporarily Applicable
Bahrain -- 2/5/2007 --
Brazil -- 09/21/1995 -- No
Guinea -- 11/08/2006 -- *
Israel -- 06/24/1976 -- Yes
Madagascar -- 08/1/2006 -- *
Oman -- 05/30/2007 -- *
Palestine -- 07/10/2000 -- No
Timor-Leste -- 08/10/2005 -- No
Trinidad & Tobago -- 09/08/2006 -- No
(*) Previous treaties apply
Germany has signed, but not yet ratified, treaties with
the following country.
Country -- Signed -- Temporarily Applicable
Libya -- 10/15/2004 -- No
Germany does not have a bilateral investment treaty with
the United States, but an FCN treaty dating from 1956
remains in force. Taxation of U.S. firms within Germany
is governed by the 1989 "Convention for the Avoidance of
Double Taxation with Respect to Taxes on Income." It has
been in effect since 1989 (and since January 1, 1991, for
the area that comprised the former German Democratic
Republic). With respect to income taxes, both countries
agree to grant credit for their respective federal income
taxes on taxes paid on profits by enterprises located in
each other's territory. The German system is more
complex, but there are more similarities than differences
between the German and U.S. business tax systems. The
U.S. and Germany ratified the Protocol of June 1, 2006,
amending their 1989 income tax treaty and protocol. The
new protocol updates the existing treaty and includes
several changes, including a zero-rate provision for
subsidiary-parent dividends, a more restrictive
limitation-on-benefits provision and a mandatory binding
arbitration provision.
OPIC and Other Investment Insurance Programs
OPIC programs were available for the new states of eastern
Germany following reunification for several years during
the early 1990s but were suspended following progress in
the economic and political transition.
Labor
The German labor force is generally highly skilled, well
educated, disciplined, and very productive. The complex
set of reforms of labor and social welfare-related
institutions implemented under the former SPD/Greens
Government contributed to overcoming structural weaknesses
of the German welfare state and creating an institutional
setup more conducive to strong employment growth and lower
unemployment. A series of changes in collective
bargaining has supplemented government efforts in recent
years.
Chancellor Angela Merkel's Grand Coalition initiated more
reform measures, such as a gradual increase in the
mandatory retirement age from 65 to 67 - a move that would
add 2.5 million to the workforce by 2030 - and an
initiative aimed at reducing unemployment among older
workers and discouraging early retirement. The former
grand coalition also encouraged female labor market
participation by measures that would make it easier for
mothers to work - for example, longer school hours and
more day-care centers. To address the problem of
Germany's low birth rate, it also adopted a new "parents'
allowance," which entitles parents who give up work or
reduce their hours of work to care for their newborn
children to a compensatory monthly payment for a period of
one year.
To address rising health care costs, Germany implemented
numerous health care reforms, most recently in April 2007.
The introduction of a Health Fund is the key pillar of
reform: Beginning in 2009, insured persons' contributions
to the statutory health insurance companies are
standardized. For each insured person, the health
insurance companies receive a flat rate from the Health
Fund. At the same time, tax financing of health insurance
services, such as contribution-exempt insuring of children
of insured parents, commenced. From 2009 onward,
insurance has become compulsory for everyone, and private
health insurance companies are obliged to accept insured
persons at the base rate.
Germany does not have a statutory minimum wage. However,
binding minimum wages have been established in 14 sectors
(e.g., construction, electrical trades, painting, mail)
covering an estimated 1.4 million workers. In August 2009,
employers and union representatives agreed to introduce
minimum wages for approximately 170,000 workers in waste
management, large-scale laundries, and special mining
services. The new CDU/CSU-FDP coalition is opposed to the
introduction of a national minimum wage but advocates a
legal ban on "immoral" wages, i.e., wages which are one-
third below average wages in a given sector.
After several years of solid economic growth and declining
unemployment, the global financial crisis finally hit
Germany at the end of 2008. Although the collapse in
global demand had an especially damaging effect on
Germany's export-driven economy, the labor market
weathered the economic crisis exceptionally well, with
employment levels down a mere 0.2 % to 40.4 million year-
on-year in contrast to a GDP collapse of about 5 %. The
number of persons out of work averaged 3.423 million in
2009, an increase of 155,000 as compared with 2008. The
average unemployment rate as a percentage of the total
civilian labor force rose 0.4 percentage points to 8.2 %
in 2009.
Among the reasons behind the surprising resiliency of the
labor market is the widespread use of government-funded
short-time work programs. Many companies entered the
recession with a better capital cushion than previously
and deliberately decided to keep highly skilled labor in
hopes of riding out the crisis. In addition, large
sections of the services sector (e.g., health and welfare,
education and training) have not been hit by the recession
and are continuing to create jobs. But unemployment will
certainly increase in 2010, since the labor market
traditionally lags other macro-economic indicators, which
in late 2009 showed first signs that the recession was
easing. Hence, the German government expects unemployment
to average 3.6 to 3.7 million in 2010.
In June 2009, the Institute of Economic and Social
Research presented its interim report on Germany's 2009
round of collective bargaining. The study evaluates the
collective agreements concluded in the first half of 2009,
affecting about 25% of all employees covered by such
agreements. Calculated on an annual basis, the average
increase in wages and salaries amounts to about 3% in
2009, which is slightly above the average pay increase of
2.9% in 2008.
There is still a considerable gap in earnings between men
and women in Germany. Collective agreements concluded in
the first half of 2009 did not include provisions to
tackle wage discrimination and to promote equal
opportunity.
Since the late 1990s, Germany's system of wage
determination through multi-company, industry-wide
contracts has become considerably more decentralized.
Although sector-wide labor agreements can set wages and
working conditions at high levels in some industries,
company-level agreements frequently deviate significantly
from them. Many industry-wide contracts have been revised
in recent years, not only to include highly flexible
working time arrangements but also to introduce escape
clauses for ailing companies, and to lower entrance pay
scales and performance-based annual bonuses. Moreover,
the coverage of collective agreements has been declining.
Multi-company, industry-wide contracts cover about 43.4%
of all firms; 5.3% are covered by a company-level
agreement; and 51.3% are not covered at all. Coverage in
the eastern states is even lower than in the west. In
terms of workers covered by a collective agreement, 73.6%
of workers are covered, while 26.4% are uncovered. Again,
the coverage is higher in the west than in the east.
To cope with the impact of plant closures and
redundancies, several unions negotiated a new type of
collective agreement (Sozialtarifvertraege) to regulate
plant closures or relocations of sites. These agreements
usually provide for the transfer of employees to "job
creation" agencies, training, and redundancy payments.
Germany's education system for skilled labor, combining
on-the-job and in-school training for apprentices,
produces many of the skills employers need. There are
rigidities in the training system, however, such as
restrictions on night work for apprentices, to which some
employers object. Another criticism is that the system is
inflexible with regard to occupational categories and
training standards. Labor unions complain employers do
not establish enough training slots and do not hire enough
of the trainees after their training is completed.
Regulatory obstacles to workers' mobility remain high in
Germany (and throughout the EU) and have also contributed
to serious labor shortages in many high-skilled fields,
above all for engineering, technical professions and
manufacturing trades. An important element of German
labor market policy is public support for training. The
country's response to the crisis has included an expansion
of existing measures as well as the introduction of new
schemes, with total additional spending estimated at euro
1.97 billion, or 36% of the labor market part of the
government's stimulus program. A 2009 case study found
that the publicly funded training is helping to address
skills shortages present before the advent of the crisis.
While trade union membership has continued to decline
since the beginning of the 1990s, there has been a notable
slowdown of this development in recent years. About 21%
of the workforce is organized into unions. The
overwhelming majority are in eight unions largely grouped
by industry or service sector. These unions are
affiliates of the German Trade Union Federation (DGB).
Several smaller unions exist outside the DGB, principally
in white-collar professions. Since peaking at more than
13 million members shortly after German re-unification,
total union membership has steadily declined to 6.3
million at the end of 2008.
Unions' right to strike and the employers' right to lock
out are protected in the German constitution. Court
rulings over the years have limited management recourse to
lockouts, however. Institute of Economic and Social
Research data published in April 2009 reveal that
industrial action in Germany in 2008 involved 1.6 million
striking workers - about one million more than in 2007.
However, the estimate of 542,000 days not worked was about
25% less than in 2007. On the other hand, the official
records of the Federal Employment Agency counted just
154,052 strikers, amounting to 131,679 days not worked;
incomplete reporting may explain this disparity.
At the company level, works councils represent the
interests of workers vis-a-vis their employers. A works
council may be elected in all private companies employing
at least five people. The rights of the works council
include the right to be informed, to be consulted, and to
participate in company decisions. Works councils often
help labor and management to settle problems before they
become disputes and disrupt work.
"Codetermination" laws give the workforce in medium-sized
or large companies (stock corporations, limited liability
companies, partnerships limited by shares, co-operatives,
and mutual insurance companies) significant voting
representation on the firms' supervisory boards. This
codetermination in the supervisory board extends to all
company activities.
Foreign-Trade Zones / Free Ports
There are seven free ports in Germany established and
operated under EU Community law: Bremerhaven, Cuxhaven,
Deggendorf, Duisburg, Emden, Hamburg and Kiel. These
duty-free zones within the ports also permit value-added
processing and manufacturing for EU-external markets,
albeit under certain requirements. All of them are open to
both domestic and foreign entities. Falling tariffs and
the progressive enlargement of the EU have in recent years
gradually eroded much of the utility and attractiveness of
duty-free zones, but there are currently no plans to
eliminate them.
Foreign Direct Investment Statistics
According to the U.S. Department of Commerce's Bureau of
Economic Analysis, in 2008 German direct investment in the
United States was worth $211 billion, while U.S. direct
investment in Germany was worth $110 billion. Foreign
investment has been particularly strong in eastern
Germany, where about 1 trillion euros have been invested
since 1991, of which an estimated 84% came from private,
non-government sources. Some 2,000 foreign companies,
including 300 U.S. firms, have invested in eastern Germany
since reunification.
Top 10 U.S. Companies in Germany by 2008 Sales
Company -- Est. Sales in 2008 (in mio euro)
Ford-Werke GmbH -- 19,762
ExxonMobil Central Europe Holding GmbH -- 15,200
Adam Opel *) -- 13,000
ConocoPhillips Germany *) -- 13,000
IBM Gruppe Deutschland *) -- 9,300
GE Deutschland *) -- 9,200
Philip Morris GmbH -- 6,268
Hewlett-Packard GmbH -- 5,000
Dow Group Germany *) -- 4,835
Procter & Gamble *) -- 4,600
(Source: American Chamber of Commerce in Germany
"Commerce Germany" September 2009)
Foreign Direct Investments in Germany by key sectors (2007
- millions of euros)
Holding companies -- 81,137
Retail -- 54,462
Credit and banking -- 47,936
Data processing -- 40,977
Chemical industry -- 32,205
Machine tools -- 16,784
Insurance -- 16,211
Services -- 15,372
Real estate -- 15,214
Medical, measuring equipment, optics -- 9,369
Automobiles and parts -- 8,560
(Source: Deutsche Bundesbank, Bestandserhebung ueber
Direktinvestitionen)
MURPHY