

Currently released so far... 51122 / 251,287
Articles
Brazil
Sri Lanka
United Kingdom
Sweden
00. Editorial
United States
Latin America
Egypt
Jordan
Yemen
Thailand
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
2011/05/18
2011/05/19
2011/05/20
2011/05/21
2011/05/22
2011/05/23
2011/05/24
2011/05/25
2011/05/26
2011/05/27
2011/05/28
2011/05/29
2011/05/30
2011/05/31
2011/06/01
2011/06/02
2011/06/03
2011/06/04
2011/06/05
2011/06/06
2011/06/07
2011/06/08
2011/06/09
2011/06/10
2011/06/11
2011/06/12
2011/06/13
2011/06/14
2011/06/15
2011/06/16
2011/06/17
2011/06/18
2011/06/19
2011/06/20
2011/06/21
2011/06/22
2011/06/23
2011/06/24
2011/06/25
2011/06/26
2011/06/27
2011/06/28
2011/06/29
2011/06/30
2011/07/01
2011/07/02
2011/07/04
2011/07/05
2011/07/06
2011/07/07
2011/07/08
2011/07/10
2011/07/11
2011/07/12
2011/07/13
2011/07/14
2011/07/15
2011/07/16
2011/07/17
2011/07/18
2011/07/19
2011/07/20
2011/07/21
2011/07/22
2011/07/23
2011/07/25
2011/07/27
2011/07/28
2011/07/29
2011/07/31
2011/08/01
2011/08/02
2011/08/03
2011/08/05
2011/08/06
2011/08/07
2011/08/08
2011/08/09
2011/08/10
2011/08/11
2011/08/12
2011/08/13
2011/08/15
2011/08/16
2011/08/17
2011/08/18
2011/08/19
2011/08/21
2011/08/22
2011/08/23
2011/08/24
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Antananarivo
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Alexandria
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embasy Bonn
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Brazzaville
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangui
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Belfast
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Cotonou
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chiang Mai
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Chengdu
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
DIR FSINFATC
Consulate Dusseldorf
Consulate Durban
Consulate Dubai
Consulate Dhahran
Embassy Guatemala
Embassy Grenada
Embassy Georgetown
Embassy Gaborone
Consulate Guayaquil
Consulate Guangzhou
Consulate Guadalajara
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Hong Kong
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kolonia
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Krakow
Consulate Kolkata
Consulate Karachi
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Lusaka
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Lome
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy Libreville
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Leipzig
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Mission Geneva
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Mogadishu
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maseru
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Merida
Consulate Melbourne
Consulate Matamoros
Consulate Marseille
Embassy Nouakchott
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Nuevo Laredo
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Consulate Nagoya
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Praia
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Moresby
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Podgorica
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Hillah
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Surabaya
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy Tirana
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
Consulate Thessaloniki
USUN New York
USMISSION USTR GENEVA
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Mission CD Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
UN Rome
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vientiane
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AMGT
ASEC
AEMR
AR
APECO
AU
AORC
ADANA
AJ
AF
AFIN
AMED
AS
AM
ABLD
AFFAIRS
AMB
APER
ACOA
AND
AA
AE
AADP
AID
AO
AL
AG
AORD
ADM
AINF
AINT
ASEAN
AORG
ABT
APEC
AY
ASUP
ARF
AGOA
AVIAN
ATRN
ANET
AGIT
ASECVE
ABUD
AODE
ALOW
ADB
AN
ADPM
ASPA
ARABL
AFSN
AZ
AC
AIAG
AFSI
ASCE
ASIG
ACABQ
ADIP
AFGHANISTAN
AROC
ADCO
ACOTA
ANARCHISTS
AMEDCASCKFLO
AK
ARABBL
ASCH
ANTITERRORISM
AGRICULTURE
AOCR
ARR
ASSEMBLY
AORCYM
AFPK
ACKM
AGMT
AEC
APRC
AIN
AFPREL
ASFC
ASECTH
AFSA
AINR
AOPC
AFAF
AFARI
AX
ASECAF
ASECAFIN
AT
AFZAL
APCS
AGAO
AIT
ARCH
AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL
AMEX
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AORCD
AVIATION
ARAS
AINFCY
ACBAQ
AOPR
AREP
AOIC
ASEX
ASEK
AER
AGR
AMCT
AVERY
APR
AEMRS
AFU
AMG
ATPDEA
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AORL
ACS
AMCHAMS
AECL
AUC
ACAO
BA
BR
BB
BG
BEXP
BY
BRUSSELS
BU
BD
BTIO
BK
BL
BE
BMGT
BO
BM
BX
BN
BWC
BBSR
BTT
BC
BH
BILAT
BUSH
BHUM
BT
BTC
BMENA
BOND
BAIO
BP
BF
BRPA
BURNS
BUT
BBG
BCW
BOEHNER
BOL
BASHAR
BIDEN
BFIN
BZ
BEXPC
BTIU
CPAS
CA
CASC
CS
CBW
CIDA
CO
CODEL
CI
CROS
CU
CH
CWC
CMGT
CVIS
CDG
CTR
CG
CF
CHIEF
CJAN
CBSA
CE
CY
CB
CW
CM
CHR
CD
COE
CV
COUNTER
CT
CN
CPUOS
CTERR
CVR
CVPR
CDC
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CONS
COM
CACS
CR
CONTROLS
CAN
CACM
COMMERCE
CAMBODIA
CFIS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITES
CONDOLEEZZA
CZ
CTBT
CEN
CLINTON
CFED
CARC
CTM
CARICOM
CSW
CICTE
CYPRUS
CBE
CMGMT
CARSON
CWCM
CIVS
COUNTRYCLEARANCE
CENTCOM
CAPC
COPUOS
CKGR
CITEL
CQ
CITT
CIC
CARIB
CVIC
CAFTA
CVISU
CDB
CEDAW
CNC
CJUS
COMMAND
CENTER
COL
CAJC
CONSULAR
CLMT
CBC
CIA
CNARC
CIS
CEUDA
CHINA
CAC
CL
DR
DJ
DEMOCRATIC
DEMARCHE
DOMESTIC
DISENGAGEMENT
DB
DA
DHS
DAO
DCM
DAVID
DO
DEAX
DEFENSE
DEA
DTRO
DPRK
DOC
DTRA
DK
DAC
DOD
DRL
DRC
DCG
DE
DOT
DEPT
DOE
DS
DKEM
ECON
ETTC
EFIS
ETRD
EC
EMIN
EAGR
EAID
EFIN
EUN
ECIN
EG
EWWT
EINV
ENRG
ELAB
EPET
EIND
EN
EAIR
EUMEM
ECPS
ES
EI
ELTN
ET
EZ
EU
ER
EINT
ENGR
ECONOMIC
ENIV
EFTA
ETRN
EMS
EUREM
EPA
ESTH
EEB
EET
ENV
EAG
EXIM
ECTRD
ELNT
ENVIRONMENT
ECA
EAP
EINDIR
ETR
ECONOMY
ETRC
ELECTIONS
EICN
EXPORT
EARG
EGHG
EID
ETRO
EINF
EAIDHO
ECIP
EENV
EURM
EPEC
ERNG
ENERG
EIAD
EXBS
ED
EREL
ELAM
EK
EWT
ENGRD
EDEV
ECE
ENGY
EXIMOPIC
ETRDEC
ECCT
EUR
ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID
EFI
ECOSOC
EXTERNAL
ESCAP
ETCC
EENG
ERA
ENRD
ECLAC
ETRAD
EBRD
ENVR
ECONENRG
ELTNSNAR
ELAP
EPIT
EDUC
EAIDXMXAXBXFFR
EETC
EIVN
EDRC
EGOV
ETRA
EAIDRW
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ESA
ETRDGK
ENVI
ELN
EPRT
EPTED
ERTD
EUM
EAIDS
EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM
EDU
EV
EAIDAF
EDA
EPREL
EINVEFIN
EAGER
ETMIN
EUCOM
ECCP
EIDN
EINVKSCA
ENNP
EFINECONCS
ETC
EAIRASECCASCID
EINN
ETRP
ECONOMICS
ENERGY
EIAR
EINDETRD
ECONEFIN
EURN
ETRDEINVTINTCS
EFIM
ETIO
EATO
EIPR
EINVETC
ETTD
ETDR
EIQ
ECONCS
ENRGIZ
EAIG
ENTG
EUC
ERD
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECUN
FR
FI
FOREIGN
FARM
FIR
FAO
FK
FARC
FAS
FJ
FREEDOM
FAC
FINANCE
FBI
FTAA
FM
FCS
FAA
FORCE
FDA
FTA
FT
FCSC
FMGT
FINR
FIN
FDIC
FOR
FOI
FO
FMLN
FISO
GM
GERARD
GT
GA
GG
GR
GTIP
GH
GZ
GE
GB
GY
GAZA
GJ
GEORGE
GOI
GCC
GMUS
GI
GLOBAL
GV
GC
GL
GOV
GKGIC
GF
GWI
GIPNC
GUTIERREZ
GTMO
GANGS
GAERC
GUILLERMO
GASPAR
HR
HA
HYMPSK
HO
HK
HUMAN
HU
HN
HHS
HURI
HUD
HUMRIT
HUMANITARIAN
HUMANR
HL
HSTC
HILLARY
HCOPIL
HADLEY
HOURANI
HI
HUM
HEBRON
HUMOR
IZ
IN
IAEA
IS
IMO
ILO
IR
IC
IT
ITU
ID
IV
IMF
IBRD
IWC
ICAO
ICRC
INF
IO
IPR
ISO
IK
ISRAELI
IQ
ICES
IDB
INFLUENZA
IRAQI
ISCON
IGAD
IRAN
ITALY
IRAQ
ICTY
ICTR
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IQNV
IADB
INTERNAL
INMARSAT
IRDB
ILC
INCB
INRB
ICJ
ISRAEL
INR
IEA
ISPA
ICCAT
IOM
ITRD
IHO
IL
IFAD
ITRA
IDLI
ISCA
INL
INRA
INTELSAT
ISAF
ISPL
IRS
IEF
ITER
INDO
IIP
IND
IEFIN
IACI
IAHRC
INNP
IA
INTERPOL
IFIN
ISSUES
IZPREL
IRAJ
IF
ITPHUM
ITA
IP
IRPE
IDA
ISLAMISTS
ITF
INRO
IBET
IDP
IRC
KMDR
KPAO
KOMC
KNNP
KFLO
KDEM
KSUM
KIPR
KFLU
KE
KCRM
KJUS
KAWC
KZ
KSCA
KDRG
KCOR
KGHG
KPAL
KTIP
KMCA
KCRS
KPKO
KOLY
KRVC
KVPR
KG
KWBG
KTER
KS
KN
KSPR
KWMN
KV
KTFN
KFRD
KU
KSTC
KSTH
KISL
KGIC
KSEP
KFIN
KTEX
KTIA
KUNR
KCMR
KCIP
KMOC
KTDB
KBIO
KBCT
KMPI
KSAF
KACT
KFEM
KPRV
KPWR
KIRC
KCFE
KRIM
KHIV
KHLS
KVIR
KNNNP
KCEM
KLIG
KIRF
KNUP
KSAC
KNUC
KPGOV
KTDD
KIDE
KOMS
KLFU
KNNC
KMFO
KSEO
KJRE
KJUST
KMRS
KSRE
KGIT
KPIR
KPOA
KUWAIT
KIVP
KICC
KSCS
KPOL
KSEAO
KRCM
KSCI
KNAP
KGLB
KICA
KCUL
KPRM
KFSC
KQ
KPOP
KPFO
KPALAOIS
KREC
KBWG
KR
KTTB
KNAR
KCOM
KESS
KINR
KOCI
KWN
KCSY
KREL
KTBT
KFTN
KW
KRFD
KFLOA
KHDP
KNEP
KIND
KHUM
KSKN
KOMO
KDRL
KTFIN
KSOC
KPO
KGIV
KSTCPL
KSI
KPRP
KFPC
KNNB
KNDP
KICCPUR
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KDMR
KFCE
KIMMITT
KMCC
KMNP
KSEC
KOMCSG
KGCC
KRAD
KCRP
KAUST
KWAWC
KCHG
KRDP
KPAS
KTIAPARM
KPAOPREL
KWGB
KIRP
KMIG
KLAB
KSEI
KHSA
KNPP
KPAONZ
KWWW
KGHA
KY
KCRIM
KCRCM
KGCN
KPLS
KIIP
KPAOY
KTRD
KTAO
KJU
KBTS
KWAC
KFIU
KNNO
KPAI
KILS
KPA
KRCS
KWBGSY
KNPPIS
KNNPMNUC
KNPT
KERG
KLTN
KPREL
KTLA
KO
KAWK
KVRP
KAID
KX
KENV
KWCI
KNPR
KCFC
KNEI
KFTFN
KTFM
KCERS
KDEMAF
KMEPI
KEMS
KBTR
KEDU
KIRL
KNNR
KMPT
KPDD
KPIN
KDEV
KFRP
KTBD
KMSG
KWWMN
KWBC
KA
KOM
KWNM
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KRGY
KNNF
KICR
KIFR
KWMNCS
KPAK
KDDG
KCGC
KID
KNSD
KMPF
KWMM
MARR
MX
MASS
MOPS
MNUC
MCAP
MTCRE
MRCRE
MTRE
MASC
MY
MK
MG
MU
MILI
MO
MZ
MEPP
MCC
MEDIA
MOPPS
MI
MAS
MW
MP
MEPN
MV
MD
MR
MC
MCA
MT
MIL
MARITIME
MOPSGRPARM
MAAR
MOOPS
ML
MA
MN
MNUCPTEREZ
MTCR
MUNC
MPOS
MONUC
MGMT
MURRAY
MACP
MINUSTAH
MCCONNELL
MGT
MNUR
MF
MEPI
MOHAMMAD
MAR
MAPP
MNU
MFA
MTS
MLS
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MED
MNVC
MIK
MBM
MILITARY
MAPS
MARAD
MDC
MACEDONIA
MASSMNUC
MUCN
MQADHAFI
MPS
NZ
NATO
NI
NO
NU
NG
NL
NPT
NS
NA
NP
NASA
NSF
NEA
NANCY
NSG
NRR
NATIONAL
NMNUC
NC
NSC
NAS
NARC
NELSON
NATEU
NDP
NIH
NK
NIPP
NR
NERG
NSSP
NE
NTDB
NT
NEGROPONTE
NGO
NATOIRAQ
NAR
NZUS
NCCC
NH
NAFTA
NEW
NRG
NUIN
NOVO
NATOPREL
NV
NICHOLAS
NPA
NSFO
NW
NORAD
NPG
NOAA
OPRC
OPDC
OTRA
OECD
OVIP
OREP
ODC
OIIP
OAS
OSCE
OPIC
OMS
OFDP
OFDA
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OSCI
OM
OPAD
ODPC
OIC
ODIP
OPPI
ORA
OCEA
OREG
OMIG
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXP
OPEC
OFPD
OAU
OCII
OIL
OVIPPRELUNGANU
OSHA
OPCD
OPCR
OF
OFDPQIS
OSIC
OHUM
OTR
OBSP
OGAC
OESC
OVP
ON
OES
OTAR
OCS
PREL
PGOV
PARM
PINR
PHUM
PM
PREF
PTER
PK
PINS
PBIO
PHSA
PE
PBTS
PA
PL
POL
PAK
POV
POLITICS
POLICY
PO
PRELTBIOBA
PKO
PIN
PNAT
PU
PGOVPREL
PALESTINIAN
PTERPGOV
PELOSI
PAS
PP
PTEL
PROP
PRELAF
PRHUM
PRE
PUNE
PIRF
PVOV
PROG
PERSONS
PROV
PKK
PRGOV
PH
PLAB
PDEM
PCI
PRL
PRM
PINSO
PERM
PETR
PPAO
PERL
PBS
PETERS
PRELBR
PCON
POLITICAL
PMIL
POLM
PKPA
PNUM
PLO
PTERM
PJUS
PARMP
PNIR
PHUMKPAL
PG
PREZ
PGIC
PAO
PROTECTION
PRELPK
PGOVENRG
PATTY
PSOC
PARTIES
PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ
PMIG
PAIGH
PARK
PETER
PHUS
PKPO
PGOVECON
POUS
PMAR
PWBG
PAR
PGOVGM
PHUH
PTE
PY
POLUN
PDOV
PGOVSOCI
PGOVPM
PRELEVU
PGOR
PBTSRU
PHUMA
PHUMR
PPD
PGV
PRAM
PARMS
PINL
PSI
PKPAL
PPA
PTERE
PGOF
PINO
PREO
PHAS
PAC
PRESL
PORG
PS
PGVO
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PINT
PRELP
PREFA
PNG
PTBS
PFOR
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PREK
PHJM
POLINT
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PECON
PEACE
PROCESS
PLN
PEDRO
PF
PGPV
PCUL
PGGV
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGIV
PHUMPREL
POGOV
PEL
PBT
PAMQ
PINF
PSEPC
POSTS
PAHO
PHUMPGOV
PGOC
PNR
RS
RP
RU
RW
RFE
RCMP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
REFORM
RO
ROW
ROBERT
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RELATIONS
RAY
ROBERTG
RIGHTS
RM
RATIFICATION
RREL
RBI
RICE
ROOD
REL
RODHAM
RGY
RUEHZO
RELIGIOUS
RELFREE
RUEUN
RELAM
RSP
RF
REO
REGIONAL
RUPREL
RI
REMON
RPEL
RSO
SCUL
SENV
SOCI
SZ
SNAR
SO
SP
SU
SY
SI
SMIG
SYR
SA
SW
SF
SR
SYRIA
SNARM
START
SPECIALIST
SG
SNIG
SCI
SGWI
SE
SIPDIS
SANC
SELAB
SN
SETTLEMENTS
SCIENCE
SENVENV
SENS
SPCE
SPAS
SECURITY
SENC
SOCIETY
SOSI
SENVEAGREAIDTBIOECONSOCIXR
SEN
SPECI
ST
SL
SENVCASCEAIDID
SC
SECRETARY
STR
SNA
SOCIS
SADC
SEP
SK
SHUM
SYAI
SMIL
STEPHEN
SNRV
SKCA
SENSITIVE
SECI
SCUD
SCRM
SGNV
SECTOR
SAARC
SENVSXE
SWMN
STEINBERG
SOPN
SOCR
SCRS
SWE
SARS
SNARIZ
SUDAN
SENVQGR
SAN
SM
SFNV
SSA
SPCVIS
SOFA
SCULKPAOECONTU
SENVKGHG
SHI
SEVN
SH
SNARCS
SNARN
SIPRS
TBIO
TW
TRGY
TSPA
TU
TPHY
TI
TX
TH
TIP
TSPL
TNGD
TZ
TS
TC
TK
TURKEY
TERRORISM
TPSL
TINT
TRSY
TERFIN
TPP
TT
TECHNOLOGY
TE
TAGS
TRAFFICKING
TJ
TN
TO
TD
TP
TREATY
TR
TA
TIO
TECH
TF
TRAD
TNDG
TWI
TPSA
TWL
TAUSCHER
TRBY
TL
TV
THPY
TSPAM
TREL
TRT
TNAR
TFIN
TWCH
THOMMA
THOMAS
TERROR
TRY
TBID
UK
UNESCO
UNSC
UNGA
UN
US
UZ
USEU
UG
UP
UNAUS
UNMIK
USTR
UY
USUN
UNEP
UNDC
UV
UNPUOS
UNSCR
USAID
UNODC
UNRCR
UNHCR
UNDP
UNCRIME
UA
UNHRC
UNRWA
UNO
UNCND
UNCHR
USAU
UNICEF
USPS
UNOMIG
UNESCOSCULPRELPHUMKPALCUIRXFVEKV
UR
UNFICYP
UNCITRAL
UNAMA
UNVIE
USTDA
USNC
UNCSD
USCC
UNEF
UNGAPL
USSC
UNMIC
UNTAC
UNCLASSIFIED
USDA
UNCTAD
USGS
UNFPA
UNSE
USOAS
UE
UAE
UNCHS
UNDESCO
UNC
UNSCS
UKXG
UNGACG
UNHR
UNBRO
UNCHC
UNFCYP
UNIDROIT
WHTI
WIPO
WTRO
WHO
WTO
WMO
WFP
WEET
WS
WE
WA
WHA
WBG
WILLIAM
WI
WSIS
WCL
WEBZ
WZ
WW
WWBG
WMD
WWT
WMN
WWARD
WITH
WTRQ
WCO
WEU
WB
WBEG
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 06TAIPEI562, AIT/T VIEWS ON SPECIAL 301 REVIEW 2006
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06TAIPEI562.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
06TAIPEI562 | 2006-02-24 05:29 | 2011-08-23 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED | American Institute Taiwan, Taipei |
VZCZCXRO7240
RR RUEHCN
DE RUEHIN #0562/01 0550529
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 240529Z FEB 06
FM AIT TAIPEI
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 8661
INFO RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 4712
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL 7612
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO 7442
RUEHCN/AMCONSUL CHENGDU 1055
RUEHGZ/AMCONSUL GUANGZHOU 8990
RUEHHK/AMCONSUL HONG KONG 5905
RUESLE/AMCONSUL SHANGHAI 8387
RUEHSH/AMCONSUL SHENYANG 4975
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHDC
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 07 TAIPEI 000562
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
STATE FOR EAP/RSP/TC AND EB/IPE LACROSSE, PASS USTR FOR
JCHOE-GROVES, WINTERS, WINELAND, AND STRATFORD, USDOC FOR
4431/ITA/MAC/AP/OPB/TAIWAN/MBMORGAN AND JBOGOR, DOC PASS
USPTO JURBAN AND LOC STEPP
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: KIPR ECON ETRD TW
SUBJECT: AIT/T VIEWS ON SPECIAL 301 REVIEW 2006
REF: A. STATE 14937
¶B. 05 TAIPEI 4927
¶C. 05 TAIPEI 4549
¶D. 05 TAIPEI 4330
¶E. 05 TAIPEI 4059
¶F. 05 TAIPEI 3807
¶G. 05 TAIPEI 3777
¶H. 05 TAIPEI 3712
¶I. 05 TAIPEI 3307
¶J. 05 TAIPEI 2909
¶K. 05 TAIPEI 2143
¶1. Summary: The environment for Intellectual Property
protection in Taiwan continues to improve as key sectors of
society embrace the reality that Taiwan's economic prosperity
is increasingly dependent on innovation. Taiwan authorities
have continued effective enforcement actions targeted at
optical media piracy, counterfeit pharmaceuticals and fake
branded goods. Efforts to combat internet-related piracy
continue and show promise in spite of increasing use of the
internet to market infringing goods. Judicial decisions are
beginning to reflect a better understanding of intellectual
property law and Taiwan's Intellectual Property Office has
proven itself committed to providing training to law
enforcement officials and judges, lobby for needed
legislative action, and cooperate with industry to find
creative solutions to IPR problems where legislation is
lacking.
¶2. But Taiwan's IPR protection regime still has some large
holes that continue to provide opportunities for IP pirates.
Although Taiwan's Ministry of Economic Affairs is a strong
supporter of IPR protection, that dedication is not uniformly
in evidence throughout the government. Taiwan's Ministry of
Education (MOE) has not embraced government promises to
create a positive environment for intellectual property.
MOE's unwillingness to take any actions to address illegal
downloading and copying on university campuses fosters a
disregard for IP among Taiwan's future leaders and is cause
for serious concern. Taiwan's Department of Health has
displayed a similar unwillingness to take the lead in efforts
to clamp down on the flow of counterfeit pharmaceuticals into
Taiwan. The decision by the Ministry of the Interior to
transfer 18% of the IPR Police unit to other public security
duties suggests the Taiwan government is beginning to view
IPR protection as a lower priority. Finally, Taiwan's unique
political status makes needed cooperation with regional law
enforcement agencies to combat cross-border trade in
counterfeit goods extremely difficult. In view of the
continuing lack of response by some Taiwan government
agencies to the problems of intellectual property violations,
AIT/T recommends Taiwan remain on the Special 301 Watch List
for 2006. End Summary
==============================
Optical Media Piracy in Taiwan
==============================
¶3. Since 2003, Taiwan has made great progress in controlling
optical media piracy. The passage of the Optical Media Law
in 2001 required optical disk (OD) manufacturing plants to be
licensed and mandated the use of Source Identification (SID)
Codes, giving Taiwan law enforcement the legal framework to
crack down on counterfeiters. Creation of enforcement task
forces, including the Joint Optical Disk Enforcement (JODE)
Task Force and the Integrated Enforcement Task Force (IETF),
had a significant effect on manufacturing and retail sales of
pirated optical media. Trade associations report the number
of stalls in night markets, traditionally a primary channel
for counterfeit media, has fallen from over 300 to less than
50 island-wide, a number that has remained steady for the
past two years.
¶4. As Taiwan authorities have effectively shut down
counterfeiting activities in optical media plants and retail
markets, counterfeiters have moved to using DVD burners
installed in private residences. Counterfeiters reportedly
take orders by phone or internet, burn copies on demand and
use express mail services to make deliveries. Taiwan law
TAIPEI 00000562 002 OF 007
enforcement and trade associations believe that the number of
Chinese websites offering counterfeit media is growing and
note a rise in shipments of small quantities of counterfeit
optical media, primarily movies, from China. Local trade
associations in Taiwan believe the optical media piracy rate
is falling, albeit slowly for movies and software. The
International Federation of Phonographic Industries (IFPI)
reports a dramatic drop in counterfeit CDs from 36% to 26%,
but attributes this to the growing ease and popularity of
digital content downloading.
============================================= =======
Enforcement Action by Police and Special Task Forces
============================================= =======
¶5. Taiwan law enforcement had a number of successes in 2005.
Taiwan's Joint Optical Disk Enforcement (JODE) Task Force
conducted 1193 inspections of optical disk manufacturers in
2005, up slightly from 2004. While no violations were found,
seven OD manufacturing plants did close. The IPR Police
conducted 5000 raids, filed 1428 cases and made 1593 arrests
for IPR infringement, compared to 1219 cases and 1052 arrests
in 2004. This improved result may reflect the change in late
2004 of the IPR Police from an ad-hoc task force to an
official arm of the National Police.
¶6. The National Police also used regular units to
investigate IPR infringement cases. 2005 figures show a
signicant increase in the number of cases filed and suspects
arrested. Cases increased by 10% to 4648 and arrests
increased 21% to 5245 in 2005. Trademark cases increased
dramatically, reflecting additional resources directed
towards investigation of sales of counterfeit branded and
luxury goods, primarily smuggled from China. National Police
seizures of counterfeit optical media decreased compared to
the same period in 2004. Officials attribute this drop to
the growing popularity of downloading digital content from
the internet.
¶7. Taiwan Customs reported the same number of seizures of
IPR-infringing imports in 2004 and 2005, but noted an
increase in seizures of copyright-infringing optical media.
Taiwan Customs also seized 11 incoming shipments and one
outbound shipment of counterfeit PC boards for Nintendo game
players. While changes in the copyright law in 2004 allowed
for ex officio inspections by Taiwan Customs, the law
requires rightsholders to verify within a short period that
the seized materials are counterfeit. The Motion Picture
Association has assigned personnel to Chiang Kai Shek
International Airport to verify the authenticity of suspect
parcels but Customs reports that some rightsholders are not
responsive to requests to verify suspect trademark
violations.
=====================================
Computer Software Piracy, No Progress
=====================================
¶8. The Business Software Association believes the software
piracy rate in Taiwan has remained consistent over the past
three years at 43%, in spite of some reports that suggest
that business software is increasingly being downloaded and
exchanged by P2P users. Anecdotal evidence suggests that
most servers offering cracked software are based in China.
Although the Taiwan government has made efforts to ensure the
use of only registered and legal software in government
offices, AIT is aware of cases where Taiwan government
offices are alleged to have purchased IP-infringing products
or allowed illegal downloading of copyrighted software. In
one instance, the Ministry of Defense purchased
copyright-infringing copies of software from an unlicensed
vendor. Another case alleges users under the Ministry of
Education illegally downloaded over 30,000 copies of its
software.
===========================================
Book Piracy Remains an Unquantified Problem
===========================================
TAIPEI 00000562 003 OF 007
¶9. Representatives of the Taiwan Book Publishers Association
(TBPA) believe the level of police cooperation in combating
book piracy is acceptable, but complain that judges are
reluctant to issue search warrants. TBPA alleges that some
on-campus copyshops are actively copying textbooks but do not
face sanctions from university administrators. Confusion
over the definition of "fair-use" reportedly encourages
professors and students to routinely copy all or large parts
of a copyrighted work. Police are reluctant to conduct
enforcement activities on campus after a 2002 raid on Cheng
Gong University in Tainan led to wide-spread student
protests. TBPA complains that the Ministry of Education has
been unwilling to establish a channel for dialogue on this
issue and has not taken effective steps to curb illegal
copying on campus.
=================================
Trademark Piracy a Growing Threat
=================================
¶10. As optical media piracy rates appear to be dropping,
investigations and seizures of counterfeit branded goods in
Taiwan is increasing. Police say this is because more
resources have been deployed to crack down on sale of
counterfeit bags and clothing. In 2005 police filed 2244
cases involving trademark infringement, up 21% from 2004, and
arrested 2627 sspects, up 20% from 2004. Taiwan Customs
reported that the number of seizures of counterfeit branded
goods fell from 208 in 2004 to 174 in 2005. However, Taiwan
Customs impounded 2,393,323 items in 2005, compared to just
63,264 items in 2004. Counterfeit cigarettes accounted for
most of these items, but substantial quantities of
counterfeit cosmetics, leather goods (including bags), PC
boards, medicines, and clothes were also seized. In
addition, Taiwan Customs made three seizures of export goods
totaling 700 items, including one shipment of counterfeit
Ford auto parts.
============================================= =====
Pharmaceutical Piracy Wide-Spread, DOH Not Engaged
============================================= =====
¶11. A targeted effort by Taiwan's Ministry of Justice in
2005 led to a number of seizures of counterfeit
pharmaceuticals island-wide. A few examples: In May, police
arrested a nurse's aide in Taoyuan and charged her with
selling counterfeit weight-loss drugs over the internet. The
accused reported she bought the counterfeit Reductil from
someone she had met on-line and received shipments of
counterfeit drugs from Vietnam. In December 2005, Taiwan's
IPR Police busted a ring selling counterfeit pharmaceuticals
on the internet, arresting two and seizing 5000 counterfeit
pills of Reductil, Viagra, Cialis, and other drugs. After
several months of investigation, four police units raided a
warehouse in the Taipei suburb of Xizhi, seizing 550,000
counterfeit pills of Reductil, Stillnox, Viagra, Cialis,
Zantac, Tamiflu, and others. Police estimated the street
value of the seizure as over USD 9 million. Two people were
arrested. Large quantities of high-quality packaging
materials, instruction pamphlets and labels were also found.
The quality of the counterfeit products was extremely high.
Police believe the drugs were smuggled from China in bulk,
then packaged and distributed to pharmacies, medicine shops,
and night market vendors all over Taiwan.
¶12. The majority of counterfeit pharmaceutical products
appear to be smuggled into Taiwan, usually from China, before
being packaged and distributed locally. However, according
to a statement from one of the defendants in the large case
above, they had recently begun importing chemicals from China
with an eye to producing some counterfeit drugs in Taiwan.
Packaging is reportedly produced in Taiwan and has become so
sophisticated that industry representatives are sometimes
unable to determine the fakes from a visual inspection.
¶13. The Taiwan Department of Health (DOH) has not made
efforts to stop counterfeiting of pharmaceutical products a
priority. DOH has no enforcement arm and relies on the
Ministry of Justice to lead anti-counterfeiting efforts. In
TAIPEI 00000562 004 OF 007
2003, DOH established an interagency committee that meets
biannually to share information and provide training on
recognizing counterfeit pharmaceuticals. DOH has made no
effort to cooperate with TIPO to take action against
counterfeit pharmaceuticals, nor does it play any official
role in pharmacy accreditation. DOH is focused on consumer
safety and because there have been no reports of adverse
reactions from counterfeit pharmaceuticals, combating
counterfeits is not a priority for DOH.
===========================
Changes in IPR Laws in 2006
===========================
¶14. Taiwan's Legislative Yuan passed amendments in 2005 that
would allow trademark registrations to claim multiple
priority rights. This gives TIPO the legal basis to
recognize trademark registration from other countries and set
priority dates based on the first trademark registration.
Taiwan also passed legislation to establish a patent attorney
system and provide for specialized patent attorney licensing.
In addition, TIPO began negotiations with Internet Service
Providers (ISPs) and digital content providers to devise an
ISP Code of Conduct for intellectual property protection.
While not legally binding, the proposed Code of Conduct would
spell out agreed upon measures that ISPs and content
providers could take when intellectual property infringing
items are offered for sale or trade over the internet. ISPs
have been reluctant to agree to specific measures, although
negotiations continue. Property rights associations are
considering whether to propose the amendment of appropriate
laws as a means to encourage ISPs to reach a negotiated Code.
¶15. On January 1, 2006, Taiwan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs
officially abolished its Anti-counterfeiting Committee. The
committee was established in 1981, but its duties had been
assumed by TIPO after the creation of that body in 1999.
Since that time, the ACC had become a liaison body within
TIPO without permanent staff or budget. After extensive
consultation with rightsholders groups and interested parties
(including the U.S. Department of State) TIPO officially
disbanded the ACC. The extensive consultations demonstrate
the willingness of TIPO officials to engage local and
international stakeholders and are a positive indication of
Taiwan's willingness to work with the international community
on IP protection.
======================================
P2P Cases - One Step Back, Two Forward
======================================
¶16. In 2005, Taiwan's Courts issued two conflicting rulings
in cases brought against Peer to Peer (P2P) service
providers. In June, EZPeer was found not guilty of copyright
violations after the Shilin District Court found that EZPeer
did not illegally reproduce or transmit copyrighted
materials. The Court ruled that Taiwan law did not prohibit
the use of P2P services, but implied that users could be
liable for copyright violations. Recording industry
association IFPI has appealed the decision. In September,
the Taipei District Court found Kuro and its management
guilty of copyright violations, fining the company USD 93,000
and sentencing three senior managers to up to three years in
prison. A Kuro user was also sentenced for downloading 900
copyrighted songs from Kuro and sentenced to four months
(commutable to a fine of approximately USD 1500.) The Taipei
Court found Kuro's advertisements and web banners encouraged
users to violate copyrights. The Court was also influenced
by Kuro's staff admitting to uploading thousands of songs to
the Kuro server at the direction of Kuro management. Kuro
has appealed this ruling.
============================================= ==========
Data Protection Approved, Still Waiting for Regulations
============================================= ==========
¶17. Amendments to Taiwan's Pharmaceutical Law in January
2005 provided pharmaceutical companies with five years of
TAIPEI 00000562 005 OF 007
data protection for new drugs. New products must be
registered in Taiwan within three years of release in an
advanced country market (A10 countries.) Implementing
regulations have been drafted and circulated widely among
innovative pharmaceutical companies and generic producers.
While these regulations have not yet been officially adopted,
DOH officials have assured manufacturers that products
registered after the February 2005 promulgation of the law
will be able to benefit from the data protection provisions.
DOH expects the regulations to be officially adopted no later
than June 2006.
=====================
2005 Training Efforts
=====================
¶18. TIPO and Taiwan Customs organized training sessions for
judges, prosecutors and enforcement officials throughout the
year, often in cooperation with rightsholders. Nintendo held
three training sessions for approximately 60 Taiwan Customs
officials in March and August 2005 to explain how to identify
counterfeit Nintendo hardware and game cartridges. TIPO
conducts regular training sessions for prosecutors and new
judges on IPR regulations and laws. Additional workshops for
50 judges and patent examiners on Identifying Patent
Infringements took place in August 2005 and 157 police took
part in seminars on Inspection and Prevention of
Counterfeiting on the Internet in September. Also in
September 2005, AIT and TIPO hosted a seminar attended by 88
judges, prosecutors and law enforcement personnel on
Combating Internet Piracy. Speakers included representatives
from industry associations (MPA, BSA, IFPI, and PhRMA), the
U.S. Department of Justice, the U.S. Patent and Trademark
Office, The Bronx District Attorney's Office, TIPO and the
IPR Police. TIPO regularly sends its staff to training
sessions conducted by the USPTO in Washington.
¶19. A regional IPR Seminar held in Hong Kong in September
2005 illustrated the difficulty Taiwan law enforcement has in
interacting with regional counterparts. AmConGen Hong Kong
originally invited law enforcement representatives from
across East Asia to participate in a seminar designed to
improve regional efforts to combat internet piracy. However,
Hong Kong authorities subsequently refused visa requests for
Taiwan experts and made it known that Taiwan invitees with
valid visas would be refused entry. Hong Kong's refusal to
issue visas was presumably in response to PRC concerns about
Taiwan participation in this regional cooperative event.
Taiwan is not eligible to join WIPO and is not a signatory to
the WIPO Copyright Treaty or the WIPO Performances and
Phonograms Treaty.
========================
IPR Court Coming in 2007
========================
¶20. After much discussion by legal experts and the Judicial
Yuan, an IP Court Planning Committee was established in
September 2005. The Committee agreed to include both
criminal and civil IPR cases in the mandate of the IP Court.
However, current draft legislation would require district
courts to handle first instance criminal cases involving
copyright violations. Under this proposal, the IP Court
would hear criminal copyright cases only on appeal. An IP
Court Organic Act and an IP Cases Trial Act have been
proposed to Taiwan's Legislative Yuan and TIPO expects these
bills to be considered in the current legislative session.
Training for prospective IP Court judges will begin in March
2005, with the first session of training expected to conclude
in July 2005. Subsequent training sessions for IP Court
judges will be scheduled after July.
=========================
Areas of Concern for 2006
=========================
¶21. Over the past three years, TIPO has proven itself to be
a reliable partner in efforts to combat intellectual property
violations. AIT has worked closely with TIPO leadership to
TAIPEI 00000562 006 OF 007
conduct effective training for legal officials, lobby for
needed changes in IPR law and regulation, and exchange views
with rightsholders and law enforcement officials. TIPO
officials have been in the forefront of efforts to meet new
challenges to IP protection as the internet increasingly
abets counterfeiters. However, TIPO's influence over other
government bodies is limited and not all sectors of Taiwan's
government or society are fully supportive of efforts to
combat intellectual property violations.
================================
MOE Needs to Take Responsibility
================================
¶22. The Ministry of Education (MOE) has been particularly
reluctant to embrace protection of intellectual property.
Rightholders believe IPR infringement on MOE-administered
Internet Service Provider TANet is rampant. TBPA believes
illegal copying of textbooks at on-campus copyshops is also
pervasive. A cultural sympathy in Taiwan for students likely
contributes to MOE's decision to "turn a blind eye" to this
illegal behavior. However, as a government agency, MOE has
the responsibility to abide by laws prohibiting illegal
downloading or copying of copyrighted material. MOE has not
taken steps to do so and has been unwilling to meet with
rightsholders groups or with TIPO to discuss steps that can
be taken to address these problems.
============================================= ======
Improve Cooperation in Battle on Counterfeit Pharma
============================================= ======
¶23. The Department of Health is also reluctant to take
concrete measures to address what by most estimates is a
serious counterfeit pharmaceutical problem in Taiwan.
Despite the considerable efforts of Taiwan law enforcement
officials, industry estimates that as much as 25% of
pharmaceuticals sold in Taiwan are counterfeit or illegal
parallel imports, a figure DOH accepts. For popular
"lifestyle" drugs, counterfeits could be as high as 40% of
the market. Recent police raids suggest counterfeiters are
now targeting public fears of Avian Flu to distribute
counterfeit Tamiflu. DOH has biannual meetings with law
enforcement and pharmaceutical associations but sees
counterfeiting as a public health issue, rather than an IPR
issue. DOH has refused to include TIPO in its biannual
counterfeiting working group meetings. The absence of
confirmed cases of adverse reactions to counterfeit drugs
leads DOH to make this problem a low priority. Although
penalties for manufacture, distribution or sale of
counterfeit drugs were increased by amendments to the
pharmaceutical law in 2004, DOH was unable to provide any
examples of cases where pharmacists had been arrested or lost
licenses for selling counterfeit products. DOH has only a
limited role in issuing pharmaceutical licenses and has no
power to audit or revoke licenses once issued.
======================
Fully Staff IPR Police
======================
¶24. The legal establishment of the IPR Police in 2004 was a
victory for rightsholders and a large factor in Taiwan's
removal from the Special 301 Priority Watch List in 2005.
The force was established at 220 persons and the view at the
time was that the size of the force could grow as additional
funding became available. Instead, budget cuts and
reassignment of personnel to "public security" efforts have
cut the size of the IPR Police from 220 to 180 officers. The
IPR Police is not the only special police unit to lose staff,
the Environment and Forestry Units have reportedly been
eliminated. But the reduction in staff sends the wrong
message to rightsholders and IPR infringers. In addition,
the IPR Police face shortages in internet expertise and the
latest computer equipment. In spite of these shortcomings,
the IPR Police has done exceptional work in 2005. Fully
staffed, trained and equipped, this unit could do even more.
=============================================
TAIPEI 00000562 007 OF 007
Opportunities for Regional Cooperation Needed
=============================================
¶25. Taiwan's unique political status can make opportunities
for cooperation with international counterparts rare.
Although Taiwan officials have participated in regional
meetings under the auspices of APEC or as NGO members, direct
communication that could usefully address cross-border IP
infringement is difficult. As Taiwan's law enforcement
efforts to crack down on production of counterfeit products
have been more successful, manufacturers have moved
off-shore, often to China. This creates a structural
difficulty for Taiwan officials who have limited
communication with their counterparts across the Strait.
Efforts to facilitate that communication have had little
success. Taiwan Customs reports they have virtually no
communications with their counterparts from China and Hong
Kong Customs officials recently refused to meet with Taiwan
Customs officials. As more and more counterfeit products are
exported and smuggled out of China, the inability of Taiwan
to participate in regional information sharing networks will
make combating IP piracy in Taiwan increasingly difficult.
============================================
Future Training Opportunities and Objectives
============================================
¶26. As Taiwan moves to tackle the problems posed by internet
piracy, U.S.-sponsored training that addresses internet
investigations and prosecutions and includes experienced U.S.
prosecutors as speakers would be particularly welcome.
Taiwan is also in the process of establishing an IPR Court.
Seminars by U.S. judges with experience in hearing IPR cases
would be helpful as Taiwan trains its own judges for duty on
this new Court. Efforts to assist Taiwan to build regional
information sharing networks among law enforcement officials
are badly needed to assist Taiwan to combat an increasing
torrent of counterfeit goods coming from China and other
countries. Initiatives directed towards Ministry of
Education and Department of Health officials would also be
useful in creating a better understanding of the importance
of IPR protection in education and health. Finally, advance
notice of USPTO and other training opportunities would be
helpful in ensuring maximum Taiwan participation at these
events. Currently, announcements of training opportunities
are made a few months in advance, this does not provide
sufficient time for some nominees to seek approval and obtain
funding. Earlier notifacation of yearly training programs
would facilitate greater Taiwan attendance at these important
events.
KEEGAN