Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 51122 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 04PRETORIA3919, COUNTERING UNHELPFUL NEW INTERNATIONAL INITIATIVES

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #04PRETORIA3919.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
04PRETORIA3919 2004-08-30 14:00 2011-08-24 01:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Pretoria
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS PRETORIA 003919 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: EAID EFIN ECON EINV PREL SF
SUBJECT: COUNTERING UNHELPFUL NEW INTERNATIONAL INITIATIVES 
ON ODA 
 
REF: SECSTATE 177369 
 
Sensitive But Unclassified; Protect Accordingly. 
 
1. (SBU) Summary.  Econoff met with Sheldon Moulton, head of 
the Directorate on Global Economic Organizations, to get 
South African reactions to reftel demarche.  Moulton 
explained that South Africa firmly supported the concept of 
an International Finance Facility (IFF) and would continue to 
do so.  He lauded increases in U.S. and other developed 
country official development assistance, but said that it was 
still not enough because the need was so great.  In general, 
he lamented the "sad state of honoring Monterrey pledges on 
aid and debt relief" by developed countries.  He specifically 
mentioned Professor Jeffery Sachs' calculation that the 
United States channeled only 0.14% of its GDP to development 
aid, far short of the 0.7% of GDP target embodied in the 
Monterrey Consensus.  End Summary. 
 
2. (SBU) Moulton said that South Africa supported the IFF 
concept in writing and would continue to do so.  He said that 
Finance Minister Trevor Manuel had signed a joint letter in 
support of IFF with British Chancellor of the Exchequer 
Gordon Brown.  On the concept of a global tax to fund 
development, Moulton commented that the idea had been around 
for a long time and would likely be around for a long time. 
He was not sure whether the recent dialogue on the subject 
"would bring us any closer." 
 
3. (SBU) Moulton said that President Mbeki would be attending 
President Lula's World Leaders Meeting on Financing Hunger 
and Poverty Eradication in New York in September "to try and 
find a way to advance the dialogue and to give impetus to 
meeting the goals of the Monterrey Consensus."  He thought 
that the Blair Commission (of which Manuel was a member), 
Britain's upcoming G-8 chairmanship and EU presidency, and 
the OECD's study into official development assistance would 
place increasing pressure on developed countries to increase 
their foreign assistance in the coming year.  He thought that 
other European countries would continue to support the IFF 
concept along with Britain. 
 
4. (SBU) Moulton argued that no matter how additional 
development funds were raised, developing countries would 
still have to meet the same criteria for development 
assistance that they do now.  He thought that good governance 
and accountability would remain important, and that the 
debate would continue as to how developing countries should 
strengthen themselves in these and other areas. 
FRAZER