

Currently released so far... 51122 / 251,287
Articles
Brazil
Sri Lanka
United Kingdom
Sweden
00. Editorial
United States
Latin America
Egypt
Jordan
Yemen
Thailand
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
2011/05/18
2011/05/19
2011/05/20
2011/05/21
2011/05/22
2011/05/23
2011/05/24
2011/05/25
2011/05/26
2011/05/27
2011/05/28
2011/05/29
2011/05/30
2011/05/31
2011/06/01
2011/06/02
2011/06/03
2011/06/04
2011/06/05
2011/06/06
2011/06/07
2011/06/08
2011/06/09
2011/06/10
2011/06/11
2011/06/12
2011/06/13
2011/06/14
2011/06/15
2011/06/16
2011/06/17
2011/06/18
2011/06/19
2011/06/20
2011/06/21
2011/06/22
2011/06/23
2011/06/24
2011/06/25
2011/06/26
2011/06/27
2011/06/28
2011/06/29
2011/06/30
2011/07/01
2011/07/02
2011/07/04
2011/07/05
2011/07/06
2011/07/07
2011/07/08
2011/07/10
2011/07/11
2011/07/12
2011/07/13
2011/07/14
2011/07/15
2011/07/16
2011/07/17
2011/07/18
2011/07/19
2011/07/20
2011/07/21
2011/07/22
2011/07/23
2011/07/25
2011/07/27
2011/07/28
2011/07/29
2011/07/31
2011/08/01
2011/08/02
2011/08/03
2011/08/05
2011/08/06
2011/08/07
2011/08/08
2011/08/09
2011/08/10
2011/08/11
2011/08/12
2011/08/13
2011/08/15
2011/08/16
2011/08/17
2011/08/18
2011/08/19
2011/08/21
2011/08/22
2011/08/23
2011/08/24
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Antananarivo
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Alexandria
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embasy Bonn
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Brazzaville
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangui
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Belfast
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Cotonou
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chiang Mai
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Chengdu
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
DIR FSINFATC
Consulate Dusseldorf
Consulate Durban
Consulate Dubai
Consulate Dhahran
Embassy Guatemala
Embassy Grenada
Embassy Georgetown
Embassy Gaborone
Consulate Guayaquil
Consulate Guangzhou
Consulate Guadalajara
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Hong Kong
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kolonia
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Krakow
Consulate Kolkata
Consulate Karachi
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Lusaka
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Lome
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy Libreville
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Leipzig
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Mission Geneva
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Mogadishu
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maseru
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Merida
Consulate Melbourne
Consulate Matamoros
Consulate Marseille
Embassy Nouakchott
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Nuevo Laredo
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Consulate Nagoya
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Praia
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Moresby
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Podgorica
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Hillah
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Surabaya
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy Tirana
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
Consulate Thessaloniki
USUN New York
USMISSION USTR GENEVA
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Mission CD Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
UN Rome
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vientiane
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AMGT
ASEC
AEMR
AR
APECO
AU
AORC
ADANA
AJ
AF
AFIN
AMED
AS
AM
ABLD
AFFAIRS
AMB
APER
ACOA
AND
AA
AE
AADP
AID
AO
AL
AG
AORD
ADM
AINF
AINT
ASEAN
AORG
ABT
APEC
AY
ASUP
ARF
AGOA
AVIAN
ATRN
ANET
AGIT
ASECVE
ABUD
AODE
ALOW
ADB
AN
ADPM
ASPA
ARABL
AFSN
AZ
AC
AIAG
AFSI
ASCE
ASIG
ACABQ
ADIP
AFGHANISTAN
AROC
ADCO
ACOTA
ANARCHISTS
AMEDCASCKFLO
AK
ARABBL
ASCH
ANTITERRORISM
AGRICULTURE
AOCR
ARR
ASSEMBLY
AORCYM
AFPK
ACKM
AGMT
AEC
APRC
AIN
AFPREL
ASFC
ASECTH
AFSA
AINR
AOPC
AFAF
AFARI
AX
ASECAF
ASECAFIN
AT
AFZAL
APCS
AGAO
AIT
ARCH
AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL
AMEX
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AORCD
AVIATION
ARAS
AINFCY
ACBAQ
AOPR
AREP
AOIC
ASEX
ASEK
AER
AGR
AMCT
AVERY
APR
AEMRS
AFU
AMG
ATPDEA
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AORL
ACS
AMCHAMS
AECL
AUC
ACAO
BA
BR
BB
BG
BEXP
BY
BRUSSELS
BU
BD
BTIO
BK
BL
BE
BMGT
BO
BM
BX
BN
BWC
BBSR
BTT
BC
BH
BILAT
BUSH
BHUM
BT
BTC
BMENA
BOND
BAIO
BP
BF
BRPA
BURNS
BUT
BBG
BCW
BOEHNER
BOL
BASHAR
BIDEN
BFIN
BZ
BEXPC
BTIU
CPAS
CA
CASC
CS
CBW
CIDA
CO
CODEL
CI
CROS
CU
CH
CWC
CMGT
CVIS
CDG
CTR
CG
CF
CHIEF
CJAN
CBSA
CE
CY
CB
CW
CM
CHR
CD
COE
CV
COUNTER
CT
CN
CPUOS
CTERR
CVR
CVPR
CDC
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CONS
COM
CACS
CR
CONTROLS
CAN
CACM
COMMERCE
CAMBODIA
CFIS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITES
CONDOLEEZZA
CZ
CTBT
CEN
CLINTON
CFED
CARC
CTM
CARICOM
CSW
CICTE
CYPRUS
CBE
CMGMT
CARSON
CWCM
CIVS
COUNTRYCLEARANCE
CENTCOM
CAPC
COPUOS
CKGR
CITEL
CQ
CITT
CIC
CARIB
CVIC
CAFTA
CVISU
CDB
CEDAW
CNC
CJUS
COMMAND
CENTER
COL
CAJC
CONSULAR
CLMT
CBC
CIA
CNARC
CIS
CEUDA
CHINA
CAC
CL
DR
DJ
DEMOCRATIC
DEMARCHE
DOMESTIC
DISENGAGEMENT
DB
DA
DHS
DAO
DCM
DAVID
DO
DEAX
DEFENSE
DEA
DTRO
DPRK
DOC
DTRA
DK
DAC
DOD
DRL
DRC
DCG
DE
DOT
DEPT
DOE
DS
DKEM
ECON
ETTC
EFIS
ETRD
EC
EMIN
EAGR
EAID
EFIN
EUN
ECIN
EG
EWWT
EINV
ENRG
ELAB
EPET
EIND
EN
EAIR
EUMEM
ECPS
ES
EI
ELTN
ET
EZ
EU
ER
EINT
ENGR
ECONOMIC
ENIV
EFTA
ETRN
EMS
EUREM
EPA
ESTH
EEB
EET
ENV
EAG
EXIM
ECTRD
ELNT
ENVIRONMENT
ECA
EAP
EINDIR
ETR
ECONOMY
ETRC
ELECTIONS
EICN
EXPORT
EARG
EGHG
EID
ETRO
EINF
EAIDHO
ECIP
EENV
EURM
EPEC
ERNG
ENERG
EIAD
EXBS
ED
EREL
ELAM
EK
EWT
ENGRD
EDEV
ECE
ENGY
EXIMOPIC
ETRDEC
ECCT
EUR
ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID
EFI
ECOSOC
EXTERNAL
ESCAP
ETCC
EENG
ERA
ENRD
ECLAC
ETRAD
EBRD
ENVR
ECONENRG
ELTNSNAR
ELAP
EPIT
EDUC
EAIDXMXAXBXFFR
EETC
EIVN
EDRC
EGOV
ETRA
EAIDRW
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ESA
ETRDGK
ENVI
ELN
EPRT
EPTED
ERTD
EUM
EAIDS
EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM
EDU
EV
EAIDAF
EDA
EPREL
EINVEFIN
EAGER
ETMIN
EUCOM
ECCP
EIDN
EINVKSCA
ENNP
EFINECONCS
ETC
EAIRASECCASCID
EINN
ETRP
ECONOMICS
ENERGY
EIAR
EINDETRD
ECONEFIN
EURN
ETRDEINVTINTCS
EFIM
ETIO
EATO
EIPR
EINVETC
ETTD
ETDR
EIQ
ECONCS
ENRGIZ
EAIG
ENTG
EUC
ERD
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECUN
FR
FI
FOREIGN
FARM
FIR
FAO
FK
FARC
FAS
FJ
FREEDOM
FAC
FINANCE
FBI
FTAA
FM
FCS
FAA
FORCE
FDA
FTA
FT
FCSC
FMGT
FINR
FIN
FDIC
FOR
FOI
FO
FMLN
FISO
GM
GERARD
GT
GA
GG
GR
GTIP
GH
GZ
GE
GB
GY
GAZA
GJ
GEORGE
GOI
GCC
GMUS
GI
GLOBAL
GV
GC
GL
GOV
GKGIC
GF
GWI
GIPNC
GUTIERREZ
GTMO
GANGS
GAERC
GUILLERMO
GASPAR
HR
HA
HYMPSK
HO
HK
HUMAN
HU
HN
HHS
HURI
HUD
HUMRIT
HUMANITARIAN
HUMANR
HL
HSTC
HILLARY
HCOPIL
HADLEY
HOURANI
HI
HUM
HEBRON
HUMOR
IZ
IN
IAEA
IS
IMO
ILO
IR
IC
IT
ITU
ID
IV
IMF
IBRD
IWC
ICAO
ICRC
INF
IO
IPR
ISO
IK
ISRAELI
IQ
ICES
IDB
INFLUENZA
IRAQI
ISCON
IGAD
IRAN
ITALY
IRAQ
ICTY
ICTR
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IQNV
IADB
INTERNAL
INMARSAT
IRDB
ILC
INCB
INRB
ICJ
ISRAEL
INR
IEA
ISPA
ICCAT
IOM
ITRD
IHO
IL
IFAD
ITRA
IDLI
ISCA
INL
INRA
INTELSAT
ISAF
ISPL
IRS
IEF
ITER
INDO
IIP
IND
IEFIN
IACI
IAHRC
INNP
IA
INTERPOL
IFIN
ISSUES
IZPREL
IRAJ
IF
ITPHUM
ITA
IP
IRPE
IDA
ISLAMISTS
ITF
INRO
IBET
IDP
IRC
KMDR
KPAO
KOMC
KNNP
KFLO
KDEM
KSUM
KIPR
KFLU
KE
KCRM
KJUS
KAWC
KZ
KSCA
KDRG
KCOR
KGHG
KPAL
KTIP
KMCA
KCRS
KPKO
KOLY
KRVC
KVPR
KG
KWBG
KTER
KS
KN
KSPR
KWMN
KV
KTFN
KFRD
KU
KSTC
KSTH
KISL
KGIC
KSEP
KFIN
KTEX
KTIA
KUNR
KCMR
KCIP
KMOC
KTDB
KBIO
KBCT
KMPI
KSAF
KACT
KFEM
KPRV
KPWR
KIRC
KCFE
KRIM
KHIV
KHLS
KVIR
KNNNP
KCEM
KLIG
KIRF
KNUP
KSAC
KNUC
KPGOV
KTDD
KIDE
KOMS
KLFU
KNNC
KMFO
KSEO
KJRE
KJUST
KMRS
KSRE
KGIT
KPIR
KPOA
KUWAIT
KIVP
KICC
KSCS
KPOL
KSEAO
KRCM
KSCI
KNAP
KGLB
KICA
KCUL
KPRM
KFSC
KQ
KPOP
KPFO
KPALAOIS
KREC
KBWG
KR
KTTB
KNAR
KCOM
KESS
KINR
KOCI
KWN
KCSY
KREL
KTBT
KFTN
KW
KRFD
KFLOA
KHDP
KNEP
KIND
KHUM
KSKN
KOMO
KDRL
KTFIN
KSOC
KPO
KGIV
KSTCPL
KSI
KPRP
KFPC
KNNB
KNDP
KICCPUR
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KDMR
KFCE
KIMMITT
KMCC
KMNP
KSEC
KOMCSG
KGCC
KRAD
KCRP
KAUST
KWAWC
KCHG
KRDP
KPAS
KTIAPARM
KPAOPREL
KWGB
KIRP
KMIG
KLAB
KSEI
KHSA
KNPP
KPAONZ
KWWW
KGHA
KY
KCRIM
KCRCM
KGCN
KPLS
KIIP
KPAOY
KTRD
KTAO
KJU
KBTS
KWAC
KFIU
KNNO
KPAI
KILS
KPA
KRCS
KWBGSY
KNPPIS
KNNPMNUC
KNPT
KERG
KLTN
KPREL
KTLA
KO
KAWK
KVRP
KAID
KX
KENV
KWCI
KNPR
KCFC
KNEI
KFTFN
KTFM
KCERS
KDEMAF
KMEPI
KEMS
KBTR
KEDU
KIRL
KNNR
KMPT
KPDD
KPIN
KDEV
KFRP
KTBD
KMSG
KWWMN
KWBC
KA
KOM
KWNM
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KRGY
KNNF
KICR
KIFR
KWMNCS
KPAK
KDDG
KCGC
KID
KNSD
KMPF
KWMM
MARR
MX
MASS
MOPS
MNUC
MCAP
MTCRE
MRCRE
MTRE
MASC
MY
MK
MG
MU
MILI
MO
MZ
MEPP
MCC
MEDIA
MOPPS
MI
MAS
MW
MP
MEPN
MV
MD
MR
MC
MCA
MT
MIL
MARITIME
MOPSGRPARM
MAAR
MOOPS
ML
MA
MN
MNUCPTEREZ
MTCR
MUNC
MPOS
MONUC
MGMT
MURRAY
MACP
MINUSTAH
MCCONNELL
MGT
MNUR
MF
MEPI
MOHAMMAD
MAR
MAPP
MNU
MFA
MTS
MLS
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MED
MNVC
MIK
MBM
MILITARY
MAPS
MARAD
MDC
MACEDONIA
MASSMNUC
MUCN
MQADHAFI
MPS
NZ
NATO
NI
NO
NU
NG
NL
NPT
NS
NA
NP
NASA
NSF
NEA
NANCY
NSG
NRR
NATIONAL
NMNUC
NC
NSC
NAS
NARC
NELSON
NATEU
NDP
NIH
NK
NIPP
NR
NERG
NSSP
NE
NTDB
NT
NEGROPONTE
NGO
NATOIRAQ
NAR
NZUS
NCCC
NH
NAFTA
NEW
NRG
NUIN
NOVO
NATOPREL
NV
NICHOLAS
NPA
NSFO
NW
NORAD
NPG
NOAA
OPRC
OPDC
OTRA
OECD
OVIP
OREP
ODC
OIIP
OAS
OSCE
OPIC
OMS
OFDP
OFDA
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OSCI
OM
OPAD
ODPC
OIC
ODIP
OPPI
ORA
OCEA
OREG
OMIG
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXP
OPEC
OFPD
OAU
OCII
OIL
OVIPPRELUNGANU
OSHA
OPCD
OPCR
OF
OFDPQIS
OSIC
OHUM
OTR
OBSP
OGAC
OESC
OVP
ON
OES
OTAR
OCS
PREL
PGOV
PARM
PINR
PHUM
PM
PREF
PTER
PK
PINS
PBIO
PHSA
PE
PBTS
PA
PL
POL
PAK
POV
POLITICS
POLICY
PO
PRELTBIOBA
PKO
PIN
PNAT
PU
PGOVPREL
PALESTINIAN
PTERPGOV
PELOSI
PAS
PP
PTEL
PROP
PRELAF
PRHUM
PRE
PUNE
PIRF
PVOV
PROG
PERSONS
PROV
PKK
PRGOV
PH
PLAB
PDEM
PCI
PRL
PRM
PINSO
PERM
PETR
PPAO
PERL
PBS
PETERS
PRELBR
PCON
POLITICAL
PMIL
POLM
PKPA
PNUM
PLO
PTERM
PJUS
PARMP
PNIR
PHUMKPAL
PG
PREZ
PGIC
PAO
PROTECTION
PRELPK
PGOVENRG
PATTY
PSOC
PARTIES
PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ
PMIG
PAIGH
PARK
PETER
PHUS
PKPO
PGOVECON
POUS
PMAR
PWBG
PAR
PGOVGM
PHUH
PTE
PY
POLUN
PDOV
PGOVSOCI
PGOVPM
PRELEVU
PGOR
PBTSRU
PHUMA
PHUMR
PPD
PGV
PRAM
PARMS
PINL
PSI
PKPAL
PPA
PTERE
PGOF
PINO
PREO
PHAS
PAC
PRESL
PORG
PS
PGVO
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PINT
PRELP
PREFA
PNG
PTBS
PFOR
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PREK
PHJM
POLINT
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PECON
PEACE
PROCESS
PLN
PEDRO
PF
PGPV
PCUL
PGGV
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGIV
PHUMPREL
POGOV
PEL
PBT
PAMQ
PINF
PSEPC
POSTS
PAHO
PHUMPGOV
PGOC
PNR
RS
RP
RU
RW
RFE
RCMP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
REFORM
RO
ROW
ROBERT
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RELATIONS
RAY
ROBERTG
RIGHTS
RM
RATIFICATION
RREL
RBI
RICE
ROOD
REL
RODHAM
RGY
RUEHZO
RELIGIOUS
RELFREE
RUEUN
RELAM
RSP
RF
REO
REGIONAL
RUPREL
RI
REMON
RPEL
RSO
SCUL
SENV
SOCI
SZ
SNAR
SO
SP
SU
SY
SI
SMIG
SYR
SA
SW
SF
SR
SYRIA
SNARM
START
SPECIALIST
SG
SNIG
SCI
SGWI
SE
SIPDIS
SANC
SELAB
SN
SETTLEMENTS
SCIENCE
SENVENV
SENS
SPCE
SPAS
SECURITY
SENC
SOCIETY
SOSI
SENVEAGREAIDTBIOECONSOCIXR
SEN
SPECI
ST
SL
SENVCASCEAIDID
SC
SECRETARY
STR
SNA
SOCIS
SADC
SEP
SK
SHUM
SYAI
SMIL
STEPHEN
SNRV
SKCA
SENSITIVE
SECI
SCUD
SCRM
SGNV
SECTOR
SAARC
SENVSXE
SWMN
STEINBERG
SOPN
SOCR
SCRS
SWE
SARS
SNARIZ
SUDAN
SENVQGR
SAN
SM
SFNV
SSA
SPCVIS
SOFA
SCULKPAOECONTU
SENVKGHG
SHI
SEVN
SH
SNARCS
SNARN
SIPRS
TBIO
TW
TRGY
TSPA
TU
TPHY
TI
TX
TH
TIP
TSPL
TNGD
TZ
TS
TC
TK
TURKEY
TERRORISM
TPSL
TINT
TRSY
TERFIN
TPP
TT
TECHNOLOGY
TE
TAGS
TRAFFICKING
TJ
TN
TO
TD
TP
TREATY
TR
TA
TIO
TECH
TF
TRAD
TNDG
TWI
TPSA
TWL
TAUSCHER
TRBY
TL
TV
THPY
TSPAM
TREL
TRT
TNAR
TFIN
TWCH
THOMMA
THOMAS
TERROR
TRY
TBID
UK
UNESCO
UNSC
UNGA
UN
US
UZ
USEU
UG
UP
UNAUS
UNMIK
USTR
UY
USUN
UNEP
UNDC
UV
UNPUOS
UNSCR
USAID
UNODC
UNRCR
UNHCR
UNDP
UNCRIME
UA
UNHRC
UNRWA
UNO
UNCND
UNCHR
USAU
UNICEF
USPS
UNOMIG
UNESCOSCULPRELPHUMKPALCUIRXFVEKV
UR
UNFICYP
UNCITRAL
UNAMA
UNVIE
USTDA
USNC
UNCSD
USCC
UNEF
UNGAPL
USSC
UNMIC
UNTAC
UNCLASSIFIED
USDA
UNCTAD
USGS
UNFPA
UNSE
USOAS
UE
UAE
UNCHS
UNDESCO
UNC
UNSCS
UKXG
UNGACG
UNHR
UNBRO
UNCHC
UNFCYP
UNIDROIT
WHTI
WIPO
WTRO
WHO
WTO
WMO
WFP
WEET
WS
WE
WA
WHA
WBG
WILLIAM
WI
WSIS
WCL
WEBZ
WZ
WW
WWBG
WMD
WWT
WMN
WWARD
WITH
WTRQ
WCO
WEU
WB
WBEG
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 07THEHAGUE1998, CHEMICAL WEAPONS CONVENTION (CWC): WRAP UP FOR THE
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07THEHAGUE1998.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
07THEHAGUE1998 | 2007-11-16 14:38 | 2011-08-23 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy The Hague |
VZCZCXRO8408
OO RUEHTRO
DE RUEHTC #1998/01 3201438
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 161438Z NOV 07
FM AMEMBASSY THE HAGUE
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 0700
INFO RUEHTRO/AMEMBASSY TRIPOLI IMMEDIATE
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEBAAA/DEPT OF ENERGY WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC PRIORITY
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 09 THE HAGUE 001998
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
STATE FOR ISN/CB, VCI/CCA, L/ACV, IO/S,
SECDEF FOR OSD/ISP
JOINT STAFF FOR DD PMA-A FOR WTC
COMMERCE FOR BIS (GOLDMAN)
NSC FOR LEDDY
WINPAC FOR WALTER
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: LY PARM PREL CWC
SUBJECT: CHEMICAL WEAPONS CONVENTION (CWC): WRAP UP FOR THE
TWELFTH CONFERENCE OF STATES PARTIES, NOVEMBER 5-9, 2007
REF: A. A) STATE 152370
¶B. B) THE HAGUE 1952
This is CWC-88-07.
-------
SUMMARY
-------
¶1. (SBU) The Twelfth Conference of States Parties (CSP -12)
approved a series of decisions to intensify action on Article
VII implementation, to continue consultations on specific
measures to implement Article XI, and to continue work on the
action plan on universality. The Iranian price for allowing
these decisions to move forward was report language on the
importance of developing measures for emergency assistance to
victims of chemical weapons under Article X.
¶2. (SBU) This Conference was notable for two unprecedented
procedural maneuvers, which may haunt the CWC political
bodies in the future. First was the challenge by Morocco in
the CSP of the African regional group,s slate of candidate
countries for the Executive Council, which led to a
procedural vote in plenary session. That Morocco refused to
accept the regional group,s decision, after an earlier
attempt by some in the African group to revisit their
decision on the CSP chair, will likely mean continued
divisions among the African ranks and perhaps future
disgruntled challenges to positions selected by regional
groups. Second, the inability of the Executive Council (EC)
to complete its work on Articles VII, XI and Universality
before, or during an extra meeting concurrent with the CSP,
led to the referral of all three matters directly to the
Conference. This transfer, along with the sudden Iranian
push for action on Article X, may weaken the authority of the
Executive Council and further encourage Iran or others to
bring new issues directly to the full Conference without
prior vetting through consultations or the EC.
¶3. (U) This report will cover the special meeting of the
Executive Council, the Conference of States Parties in the
order of its agenda items, and then side meetings with the
Quad and Libya. End Summary.
----------------------------------------
SPECIAL MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COUNCIL
----------------------------------------
¶4. (U) The EC met on Thursday, November 8, and again on
Friday, November 9, to consider action on Articles VII, IX
and Universality to the Conference. At the opening of the
Council, the Algerian representative, as the vice chair for
the industry cluster, requested the addition of Article VI to
the agenda (see EC-M-27/DEC/CRP.4, dated 8 November 2007).
Iran, in turn, requested consideration of Article X. The
facilitator for the Article VI consultations on &late
declarations8 (Larry Denyer, Del) made a brief report to the
EC on the consensus achieved during the most recent
consultation (October 19). However, during discussion, India
informed the EC that they did not have final instructions
regarding this decision and, because of a national holiday,
would not be able to receive such during the EC. For this
reason, this matter was deferred to EC-51.
¶5. (U) Despite lengthy adjournments for consultations,
consensus was not reached on Articles VII, X, XI, and
Universality, and the Chairman announced that time had run
out for EC action. The Council referred all four matters to
the Conference of States Parties without recommendation on
Friday afternoon.
----------------------------
CONFERENCE OF STATES PARTIES
----------------------------
AGENDA ITEMS 1- 6
----------------------------
THE HAGUE 00001998 002 OF 009
¶6. (U) Ambassador Dastis (Spain) opened CSP-12 on November 5
with an overview of the year in his role as the past
chairman. He introduced Ambassador Idris of Sudan, who was
elected as the new chairman, and the regional group
vice-chairmen of the Conference -- United States, France,
China, Iran, Russia, Croatia, Ecuador, Costa Rica, Cameroon
and Nigeria. The German Ambassador was elected chairman of
the Committee of the Whole. The Credentials Committee was
appointed.
--------------------------------------------- --------
AGENDA ITEM 7 - STATEMENT BY THE DIRECTOR-GENERAL
--------------------------------------------- --------
¶7. (U) Director-General Rogelio Pfirter,s statement
captured a number of prevailing themes that are important to
the U.S., including the CWC Tenth Year Anniversary, progress
made on the destruction of CW stockpiles and chemical weapons
production facilities, status of conversion activities,
Albania,s completion of destruction of its CW stockpile,
industry issues, TS readiness to conduct a challenge
inspection and investigation of alleged use, progress in
implementing the Article VII plan of action, adoption of the
2008 budget, universality, and the Second Review Conference.
------------------------------
AGNEDA ITEM 8 - GENERAL DEBATE
------------------------------
¶8. (U) A representative of the Secretary General of the
United Nations, Ambassador Duarte, congratulated the OPCW on
its ten year anniversary. The General Debate spanned from
Monday afternoon to late Tuesday afternoon. First to speak
were representatives of groups ) the Portuguese ambassador
on behalf of the European Union and its supporting countries,
Cuba representing the Non-aligned movement (NAM) and China,
and South Africa on behalf of the African states. The EU
expressed concern for increasing the number of inspections
for Other Chemical Production Facilities (OCPFs), and thanked
the Netherlands for having carried out a Challenge Inspection
exercise at a commercial chemical facility in Delft. Cuba
expressed concern about the pace at which possessor States
Parties are completing their obligations to destroy declared
CW stockpiles. Albania was praised as the first possessor
state to have completed destruction of its declared CW
stocks. The Cuban/NAM statement raised concerns regarding
the implementation of Article XI and technology transfer
related issues, and about the selection criteria used for
choosing sites for OCPF inspections. South Africa, speaking
on behalf of the Africa Group, also echoed the NAM position
that possessor states must complete their destruction of CW
stocks as soon as possible. The African statement also urged
the establishment of an OPCW office in Africa.
¶9. (U) Many of the States Parties (SPs) provided national
speeches following the overarching addresses made by group
representatives. Frequent themes included congratulations to
Albania for having completed destruction of its CW stockpile,
calls for possessor states to meet their obligations to
destroy all of their stockpiles within the deadlines set by
the Convention, dissatisfaction with the current OCPF
selection methodology, and the need for continued efforts and
assistance on national implementation (Art VII). Among the
developing countries, themes included the need to focus on
full implementation of Article XI, particularly at the
RevCon. Algeria emphasized the need to address the issue of
terrorism, while Pakistan called for a multilateral export
control agreement. Albania was among the last speakers to
take the floor, proudly stating that it was the first
possessor SP to eliminate its CW stocks. Albania gave credit
and thanked the US for its financial and technical support,
as well as the Swiss.
--------------------------------------------
AGENDA ITEM 9 -- STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION
--------------------------------------------
THE HAGUE 00001998 003 OF 009
¶10. (U) On November 6, A/S Paula DeSutter was featured as a
speaker under this agenda item. Her address was well
received, except for Iran,s exercise of its right to reply
in which it objected to DeSutter,s reference to its nuclear
program as inappropriate in a Chemical Weapons Convention
Conference. The U.S. requested that her speech be published
as a document of the Conference.
¶11. (U) On November 7, a representative from Hong Kong gave
a brief summary of CWC implementation in the Hong Kong
Special Administrative Region (SAR). A CWC Ordinance was
created in 2003, with enforcement beginning in 2004; Hong
Kong,s initial declaration was submitted through the Chinese
government in 2004. The rep elaborated on the authority
given to customs officials, and the permit and notification
system used to ensure CWC-relevant facilities are declared as
appropriate. Finally, she noted that a Compliance Department
has been established for the Hong Kong SAR and that the CWC
is being fully implemented.
¶12. (U) On November 7, the Conference noted a report by the
director-General on the implementation of the regime
governing the handling of confidential information by the
Secretariat (EC-48/DG.5 C-12/DG.5, dated 14 February 2007).
SIPDIS
¶13. (U) The CSP also noted a report by the Director-General
on progress made by States Parties toward fulfilling their
obligation to complete the destruction of their category 1
chemical weapons stockpiles by the extended final deadlines.
¶14. (u) Despite a series of consultations on Article VII
implementation over several weeks, the consultations under
facilitator Kimmo Laukkanen (Finland) during the week of the
CSP failed to make significant progress. Iran, later joined
by a unified statement from the NAM, questioned whether a
decision was even needed, clearly indicating that agreement
was not going to be possible until progress was made on other
items they saw as higher priorities. When a decision had not
been achieved by the EC session on Friday morning, the EC
Chair proposed sending this directly to the CSP for
consideration. A decision text was negotiated on November 9
that kept to the heart of the guidance and gave the EU and
individual countries what they needed to justify future
voluntary contributions toward national implementation
support efforts. The Conference approved the compromise
decision text Friday evening and took note of a report on the
status of implementation of Article VII (C-12/DG.6, dated 9
October 2007).
---------------
AGENDA ITEM 10
---------------
¶15. (U) The Conference approved the report of the OPCW on the
implementation of the Convention in 2006 (EC-49/4 C-12/CRP.1,
dated 27 June 2007).
------------------
AGENDA ITEM 11
------------------
¶16. (U) The Conference noted the report of the Executive
Council on the performance of its activities in the period
from 8 July 2006 to 29 June 2007 (EC-50/3 C-12/3, dated 26
September 2007). EC Chairman Romeo Arguelles (Philippines)
presented an oral report of the Council,s activities since
the report.
--------------------------------------------- --------------
AGENDA ITEM 12 -- ELECTION OF EXECUTIVE COUNCIL MEMBERS
--------------------------------------------- --------------
¶17. (U) On November 7, members of four of the five regional
groups were elected to the Executive Council to begin in May
2008, as follows:
Asia ) Iran, Kuwait, Pakistan, Sri Lanka
THE HAGUE 00001998 004 OF 009
Eastern Europe ) Former Yugoslavian Republic of Macedonia,
Russian Federation, Slovakia
GRULAC ) Chile, Costa Rica, Cuba, Peru
WEOG ) Australia, Austria, Netherlands, Spain, Sweden.
¶18. (U) On November 8 after a group meeting lasting until
midnight, the Africa Group officially put forward as their
candidates for the EC: Algeria, Libya, Nigeria and South
Africa. This slate was gaveled through by the CSP Chair
(Sudan). However, Morocco then took the floor to deliver an
impassioned plea, claiming that the vote taken in the Africa
Group was invalid, that Morocco deserved the EC seat, and
that a vote should be taken in the Conference to reverse or
nulligy the decision taken when the gavel fell, and to elect
Morocco to the EC. The OPCW Legal Advisor presented his
opinion that there was no recourse in the CSP procedures to
reverse the decision of the regional group. The meeting
adjourned until the afternoon, when the matter was re-opened.
The Moroccan representative spoke again, arguing that the
regional group,s procedures were illegal since there was no
consensus. The Chair (Sudan) held a procedural vote, in
which the decision was whether or not to uphold the
Conference,s decision in the morning to accept the African
group,s slate of countries. Many delegations were confused
as to what the vote entailed, and there was much discussion
on the margins about the precedent this could set. The vast
majority of delegations present abstained. Of the SPs
voting, twenty voted in favor of upholding the Conference,s
earlier decision to accept the African group,s candidates,
and two voted against.
--------------------------------------------- --
AGENDA ITEM 13 - 2008 PROGRAM AND BUDGET
--------------------------------------------- --
¶19. (U) The Conference adopted the OPCW Draft Program and
Budget for 2008 (C-12/DEC/CRP.4, dated 26 October 2007).
The Conference also noted the Medium Term Plan for 2008 to
2010 (C-12/S/1, dated 25 June 2007).
------------------------------------
AGENDA ITEMS 14 - 16
ADMINISTRATIVE AND FINANCIAL MATTERS
------------------------------------
¶20. (U) The Conference adopted the decision on the Scale of
Assessments for 2008 (C-12/DEC/CRP.2, dated 11 October 2007).
¶21. (U) The Conference approved the decision on the
adjustment to Argentina,s scale of assessment for 2003
(C-12/DEC/CRP.8, dated 2 November 2007).
¶22. (U) The Conference noted the External Auditor,s report
on the OPCW financial statements and Provident Fund for 2006
(C-12/DG.2, dated 1 June 2007).
¶23. (U) The Conference noted the Director General,s note on
the new External Auditor (C-12/DG.9, dated 26 October 2007).
¶24. (U) Conference noted the DG,s report on OPCW income and
expenditure for the financial year to 30 June 2007.
¶25. (U) The Conference noted the Note by the DG on the use of
the Working Capital Fund for the financial year to 30
September 2007 (C-12/DG.7, dated 11 October 2007).
¶26. (U) The Conference approved the multi-year payment plans
proposed by Moldova and Guatemala.
¶27. (U) The Conference noted the report of the Secretariat on
the status of implementation of agreed multi-year payment
plans.
¶28. (U) The Conference noted the annual report of the Office
of Internal Oversight for 2006 and the accompanying note by
the DG.
THE HAGUE 00001998 005 OF 009
¶29. (U) The Conference approved the alignment of OPCW Staff
Regulation 3.2(a) with the corresponding UN Staff Regulation
(C-12/DEC/CRP.3, dated 17 October 2007).
¶30. (U) The Conference noted the DG,s note on the transfer
of funds between programs in 2006 (C-12/DG.1, 16 February
2007).
--------------------------------------------- ------
AGENDA ITEM 17 - FOSTERING OF INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION
(ARTICLE XI)
--------------------------------------------- ------
¶31. (U) Much as was the case for Article VII, a series of
consultations on this matter over several weeks did not
produce significant results. However, the consultations
early during the week of the CSP produced marked progress but
failed to reach consensus. In fact, facilitator Li Hong
(China) did not call for further consultations later in the
week, knowing that an agreement on Article VII was the weak
link in the chain of decisions Iran and the NAM had set up.
When a decision had not been achieved by the EC session on
Friday morning, the EC agreed to refer this matter directly
to the CSP for consideration. In the end, a decision text
was negotiated that kept to the heart of U.S. guidance,
calling for continued &intensive8 consultations to develop
&concrete measures8 to ensure the full implementation of
Article XI.
--------------------------------------------
AGENDA ITEM 18 - ENSURING UNIVERSALITY
--------------------------------------------
¶32. (U) The Conference noted the annual report by the DG on
implementation of the action plan for the universality of the
Convention from 30 September 2006 to 31 August 2007
(C-12/DG.4, dated 14 September 2007). Despite the fact that
a decision on universality should have been relatively
non-controversial, the draft decision was held hostage by the
NAM until agreement was reached on all other outstanding
issues. Negotiations were characterized by a camouflaged
Iranian effort to single out Israel as a State not Party &of
particular concern8 and an equally firm German position
against reference to Israel. The Conference finally approved
late Friday a decision to continue and intensify efforts
toward full universality that avoided that contentious issue,
after the Article VII and XI compromises had been approved.
--------------------------------------------- -------------
AGENDA ITEM 19 - ESTABLISHMENT OF AN OPCW OFFICE IN AFRICA
--------------------------------------------- -------------
¶33. (U) South Africa requested and the Conference approved
the insertion of report language echoing EC-50,s report that
a new facilitator should be appointed and the Open Ended
Working group re-activated to continue consultations on an
office in Africa.
---------------------------------------------
AGENDA ITEM 20 ) REPORTS OF SUBSIDIARY BODIES
---------------------------------------------
¶34. (U) German Ambassador Burkart, Chairman of the Committee
of the Whole, reported that the Committee had not met.
¶35. (U) CSP Chairman Amb. Idris (Sudan) reported on the
General Committee.
¶36. (U) The Conference noted the report of the Ninth Meeting
of the Commission for the Settlement of Disputes Related to
(CC-9/2, dated 1 June 2007).
¶37. (U) Credentials Committee Chair Ambassador Rodriguez
Mancia (Guatemala) presented the committee,s report on
November 9 and listed the States Parties for whom credentials
THE HAGUE 00001998 006 OF 009
had been received after the close of the Committee,s
meeting. The Conference noted the Committee,s report
(C-12/4, dated 8 November 2007).
-----------------------------------
AGENDA ITEM 21 - ANY OTHER BUSINESS
-----------------------------------
¶38. (U) The Conference noted a report by the Committee on
Relations with the Host Country (C-12/HCC.1 dated 11 October
2007).
¶39. (U) Amb. Lyn Parker (UK) reported to the Conference in
his role as Chair of the Open Ended Working Group for the
Review Conference. He noted that the RevCon is an important
landmark, listed the various topics the Working Group has
already considered in its first round of discussions, and
noted that fifteen national papers and more than thirty
papers from external bodies have already been submitted and
are available on the OPCW external server. He also
highlighted the upcoming NGO forum. Finally, he neatly
sidestepped the issue of the RevCon Chair by explaining that
consultations are ongoing on &the appointment of officers
when the appropriate time comes.8
¶40. (U) Amb. Maarten Lak (Netherlands) offered thoughts on
capitalizing on the synergy created and strengthened in the
Tenth Anniversary year between the Technical Secretariat,
States Parties, chemical industry, academia, and other
stakeholders. He encouraged further exploitation of avenues
that have been opened through various symposiums and other
events held over the past year. Lak also noted concern that
attendance at the CSP each year is limited by financial
constraints that prevent many smaller SPs from attending, and
that as the host country the Netherlands is considering
funding the travel expenses for two delegates from each of a
number of developing countries next year.
¶41. (U) Poland requested that a reference be added in report
language to the UN high level meeting on the Tenth
Anniversary of the OPCW held in New York on 27 September
¶2007.
¶42. (SBU) Article X. Iran submitted a vague, last-minute
proposal the week before the CSP to establish a network for
the victims of chemical weapons attacks, thus by-passing the
ongoing facilitated consultations and the Executive Council.
When the EC did meet on November 8, Iran added Article X to
the agenda. With the limited time available, and three other
issues under active consultation, the EC was unable to reach
consensus on appropriate report language on Article X and
referred the matter to the CSP. After intensive meetings in
small groups on all the outstanding issues, it became clear
that Article X was the key for Iran to allow consensus on all
the other issues. The Conference late on Friday approved
report language emphasizing the importance of TS readiness to
respond in a timely manner to any request for assistance, and
encouraging future consultations on developing specific
measures for emergency assistance to member states and their
victims of chemical weapons. A number of States Parties
expressed concern in private that the language adopted did
not offer adequate assurance that any efforts would be
forward-looking, i.e. not focused on a retroactive assistance
program for Iran, and agreed that those clear positions will
need to be adhered to in future Article X consultations.
---------------------------------------------
AGENDA ITEM 22 - DATES OF FUTURE CSP SESSIONS
---------------------------------------------
¶43. (U) The Conference agreed respectively to the following
dates of the Thirteenth through Seventeenth Sessions of the
Conference: 2-5 Dec 2008, 30 Nov ) 4 Dec 2009, 29 Nov ) 3
Dec 2010, 28 Nov ) 2 Dec 2011 and 26 ) 30 Nov 2012. (Del
comment: This should help alleviate the time pressure on
budget negotiations, and allow all of the EC sessions to
occur before the CSP, eliminating this year,s lame duck
THE HAGUE 00001998 007 OF 009
session of the EC.)
---------------------------------------
AGENDA ITEM 23 ) ADOPTION OF THE REPORT
---------------------------------------
¶44. (U) After much back room deliberation and the final
conclusion of negotiations on Articles VII, XI and X and
Universality, the Conference approved the three decisions and
the report language on Article X. Although inter-dependence
was acknowledged by the Chair, all the decisions and the
report language were gaveled through separately in respect of
the non-linkage principle. The CSP then immediately adopted
the report of its twelfth session.
-----------------------------------
AGENDA ITEM 24 ) CLOSURE OF THE CSP
-----------------------------------
¶45. (U) The Chairperson closed the Twelfth Session of the CSP
at 2145 hours on 9 November 2007.
--------------------------
SIDE MEETINGS - QUAD LUNCH
--------------------------
¶46. (SBU) On November 8, German Ambassador Walter Burkart
hosted a lunch for the Close Allies, originally intended to
continue discussions from the October meeting in Berlin (riot
control agents, incapacitants for law enforcement, the
handling of these topics at the RevCon, and industry issues).
However, much of the time was devoted to discussing the
state of play of various issues in the CSP, to include the
rather unexpected Moroccan call that morning for a vote on
the Africa Group,s nomination of EC candidates. Delegations
agreed that abstaining from the vote was probably the only
political solution that would avoid interfering with regional
group affairs. Some time was also spent on Article X and the
Iranian proposal to establish a network for the victims of
chemical warfare, with several delegates voicing concern at
the perceived underlying political intent to assign
retroactive responsibility for compensation to Iranian
victims.
¶47. (SBU) On the unfinished business from the October 25-26
meeting in Berlin, UK Amb. Parker raised the issue of how the
group might deal with the increasing interest in discussing
&non-lethals,8 riot control agents and incapacitating
agents used for law enforcement at the RevCon. Parker
expressed the UK view that some discussion will be
unavoidable, particularly given the combined interest of
external bodies (as reflected in papers already submitted to
the Working Group), the Scientific Advisory Board, and
certain States Parties. (Del note: Assumption based on
previous positions and recent discussions is that these SPs
include Switzerland, Canada and Australia. End note.) There
was general agreement that one of the most important tasks
will be to limit discussions to terminology used in the CWC,
i.e. to avoid broad generalizations about non-lethals and
drugs as weapons. As in previous discussions, Del reps noted
that the U.S. is continuing to study these issues, but is not
likely to look favorably upon any efforts to articulate or
further clarify CWC provisions on these topics.
¶48. (SBU) In a private discussion with del reps later, the UK
suggested that perhaps a reference in the RevCon report could
be acceptable if buried under a broader heading such as
&continuing to monitor advances in science and technology,8
or a heading related to toxic chemicals and the General
Purpose Criterion. UK Rep Clive Rowland noted that the UK is
developing its thoughts along two separate tracks - its own
national position on the issues, and how to handle
discussions at the RevCon ) and would greatly appreciate
early discussions on at least the RevCon aspect with the U.S.
¶49. (SBU) The German delegation raised the prospects for
agreement on Russia,s Facility Agreement and Verification
THE HAGUE 00001998 008 OF 009
Plan for its Maradykovsky facility. German rep Peter
Beerwerth underscored Berlin,s continued concern at current
and future approaches to two-stage destruction processes, by
noting that at Pochep, German experts understand the reaction
mass will be composed of approximately 90 percent precursors.
Amb. Parker also raised the possibility of future accession
to the CWC by other states possessing chemical weapons, and
the fact that assurances of complete destruction could be
even more important in such cases. As in Berlin, there
seemed to be general resignation to the fact that the next
opportunity to apply political pressure would be Russia,s 45
percent deadline in December 2009, and no clear way ahead was
outlined for upcoming sessions of the EC.
¶50. (SBU) Discussion then turned to the future of the OPCW,
and the need for it to adapt not only to a changing
scientific and technological environment, but also to a
mission that will shift in the coming years from verification
of chemical weapons destruction to verification of industry
and a greater focus on the non-proliferation aspects of the
CWC. France raised the importance of the counter-terrorism
role of the OPCW, and noted that France will be hosting a
seminar on the future of the OPCW early next year.
Delegations agreed to further discussions on this topic, and
to keep the group informed of developing positions on
possible issues facing the RevCon.
--------------------------------------------
BILATERAL MEETING WITH THE LIBYAN DELEGATION
--------------------------------------------
¶51. (SBU) U.S. reps Robinson, Parker and Lewis met with
Mohadeb Gheton and Dr. Hesnawy of Libya on the margins of the
CSP-12 to discuss the status of Libya,s remaining Trilateral
Steering Coordinating Committee (TSCC) Chemical Subcommittee
issues regarding proliferation sensitive equipment, current
status of the CW destruction contract, and Libya,s request
to amend its approved Rabta Chemical Weapons Production
Facility (CWPF) conversion request. Under the auspices of
the TSCC Chemical Subcommittee, procedures were put into
place to monitor Libya,s progress of dismantling its CW
efforts. During the US-UK team July 2005 visit, Libyan
officials had promised to provide the TSCC Chemical
Subcommittee team an inventory of the dual-use chemical
process equipment that did not meet CWC declaration
requirements. According to Dr. Hesnawy, an inventory list
had already been provided to US officials during the
October-December 2003 timeframe and since the July 2005 team
visit to the former US CW-subcommittee co-chairman. However,
Hesnawy promised to provide the US another copy of the
inventory list through the US delegation in The Hague.
Hesnawy also stated that the dual-use equipment is slated for
production of medicines by the National Pharmaceutical
Company. (NOTE: The March 12, 2005 Agreement Protocols for
CW specifies that any of this &equipment not currently in
use will either be placed into use within three years for
peaceful purposes inside Libya or sold to a final user
mutually agreed by the three parties8 (US/UK/Libya). Libya
still needs to establish a system to account for and track
the disposition of proliferation sensitive CW production
equipment.)
¶52. (U) U.S. reps asked whether Hesnawy was still in
agreement that the US-UK could revisit the converted CWPFs at
Rabta and the CW defensive laboratory that Col. Othman, the
Head of the Libyan Nuclear and Chemical Defense School is
building; he responded positively. No timeframe for the
visit was discussed.
¶53. (U) U.S. reps also asked Libyan officials about Libya,s
reasons for withdrawing from the US )Libya contract, the
status of its contract with the new Italian firm S.I.P.S.A.,
and the progress made to date in signing a contract. Libya
explained that there were no issues with the US-Libya
Government-to-Government contract. However, issues became
apparent with the requirements of U.S. laws and
responsibilities imposed by the US Contractor on Libya
THE HAGUE 00001998 009 OF 009
Government regarding indemnification. Dr. Hesnawy stated that
these included Libya,s responsibilities for any accidents
and environmental damages resulting from an accident
occurring from the facility operation. Dr. Hesnawy stated
that he does not expect any technical problems with the
chosen technology. Libya,s Ministry of the Environment
endorses the plant, although a formal signature of approval
has not yet been received. The National Authority has
already &taken ownership8 of the destruction plant site.
¶54. (U) Although there has not been a contract signing,
letters of intent have been exchanged with the Italian
company, which has already completed plant design, and the
basic engineering design is under review. Libya has been
discussing the draft Facility Agreement and Verification Plan
for the facility since EC-50, and Dr. Hesnawy indicated
initial discussions on the documents may be concluded before
EC-52. Hesnawy also continues to be optimistic in his
projections for the destruction timeline; he estimates that
Mustard will be completed by 2009 and precursors by 2010, a
year ahead of the respective approved extended deadlines. He
also believes preparatory site work could begin as early as
December 2007. When asked for clarification on an earlier
statement that Libya would work with the Swiss branch of the
engineering firm, as opposed to the Italian branch, Hesnawy
stated he did not say that he was working with the Swiss.
Hesnawy clarified his earlier statements by explaining that
Libya will be working through Switzerland due to the
possibility of frequent labor strikes in Italy and to have
access to a more efficient banking system. U.S. reps asked
if Libya will be seeking additional US assistance; Dr.
Hesnawy noted this would only be necessary if there was a
problem in obtaining monitoring equipment from other European
suppliers. (NOTE: In a separate conversation, Dr. Hesnawy
also stated that the Government of Libya is financing the
entire destruction project at a total cost less than the
proposed US-Libya contract approach. The lower cost is based
on Hesnawy,s opinion that S.I.P.S.A. can do the project
based on his design for the destruction facility. He also
clarified that both incineration and neutralization phases
will be operated simultaneously.)
¶55. (U) Libyan officials plan to submit a note to the
Technical Secretariat requesting a change to the approved
General and Detail Conversion Plans for Rabta Pharmaceutical
Factory 1 and 2 regarding the retention of a &civilized8
sandbag wall. The wall was declared as a special feature of
the former CWPF and requires destruction. Libya is now
seeking US and UK support to retain this feature. Libya
stated that the UK had no initial objections to this proposed
amendment and was seeking similar support from the U.S. The
Libyan delegation provided the U.S. with an initial draft of
the note by the Technical Secretariat entitled &Correction
(sic) to the General and Detailed Plans for Conversion for
the Chemical Weapons Production Facilities Rabta
Pharmaceutical Factory 1 and Rabta Pharmaceutical Factory 2
(dated 2 October 2007), a copy of which is being forwarded to
Washington for review. Hesnawy stated that he was seeking the
views of the U.S. and UK and other States Parties that may
have concerns about the wall. U.S. reps noted that the issue
of the wall will require careful study in Washington, and is
unlikely to receive approval in time for the 51st session of
the Executive Council (27-30 November 2007). Given the fact
that the Secretariat apparently intends to wait for a
guarantee of U.S. and UK support before moving forward, Del
understands that this issue will not be included in the EC-51
agenda. As in previous discussions, Dr. Hesnawy also
referred to the recent TS request to itemize all equipment in
commercial buildings 3 and 4 at Rabta.
¶56. (U) JAVITS SENDS.
Gallagher