

Currently released so far... 51122 / 251,287
Articles
Brazil
Sri Lanka
United Kingdom
Sweden
00. Editorial
United States
Latin America
Egypt
Jordan
Yemen
Thailand
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
2011/05/18
2011/05/19
2011/05/20
2011/05/21
2011/05/22
2011/05/23
2011/05/24
2011/05/25
2011/05/26
2011/05/27
2011/05/28
2011/05/29
2011/05/30
2011/05/31
2011/06/01
2011/06/02
2011/06/03
2011/06/04
2011/06/05
2011/06/06
2011/06/07
2011/06/08
2011/06/09
2011/06/10
2011/06/11
2011/06/12
2011/06/13
2011/06/14
2011/06/15
2011/06/16
2011/06/17
2011/06/18
2011/06/19
2011/06/20
2011/06/21
2011/06/22
2011/06/23
2011/06/24
2011/06/25
2011/06/26
2011/06/27
2011/06/28
2011/06/29
2011/06/30
2011/07/01
2011/07/02
2011/07/04
2011/07/05
2011/07/06
2011/07/07
2011/07/08
2011/07/10
2011/07/11
2011/07/12
2011/07/13
2011/07/14
2011/07/15
2011/07/16
2011/07/17
2011/07/18
2011/07/19
2011/07/20
2011/07/21
2011/07/22
2011/07/23
2011/07/25
2011/07/27
2011/07/28
2011/07/29
2011/07/31
2011/08/01
2011/08/02
2011/08/03
2011/08/05
2011/08/06
2011/08/07
2011/08/08
2011/08/09
2011/08/10
2011/08/11
2011/08/12
2011/08/13
2011/08/15
2011/08/16
2011/08/17
2011/08/18
2011/08/19
2011/08/21
2011/08/22
2011/08/23
2011/08/24
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Antananarivo
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Alexandria
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embasy Bonn
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Brazzaville
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangui
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Belfast
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Cotonou
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chiang Mai
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Chengdu
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
DIR FSINFATC
Consulate Dusseldorf
Consulate Durban
Consulate Dubai
Consulate Dhahran
Embassy Guatemala
Embassy Grenada
Embassy Georgetown
Embassy Gaborone
Consulate Guayaquil
Consulate Guangzhou
Consulate Guadalajara
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Hong Kong
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kolonia
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Krakow
Consulate Kolkata
Consulate Karachi
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Lusaka
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Lome
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy Libreville
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Leipzig
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Mission Geneva
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Mogadishu
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maseru
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Merida
Consulate Melbourne
Consulate Matamoros
Consulate Marseille
Embassy Nouakchott
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Nuevo Laredo
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Consulate Nagoya
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Praia
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Moresby
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Podgorica
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Hillah
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Surabaya
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy Tirana
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
Consulate Thessaloniki
USUN New York
USMISSION USTR GENEVA
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Mission CD Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
UN Rome
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vientiane
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AMGT
ASEC
AEMR
AR
APECO
AU
AORC
ADANA
AJ
AF
AFIN
AMED
AS
AM
ABLD
AFFAIRS
AMB
APER
ACOA
AND
AA
AE
AADP
AID
AO
AL
AG
AORD
ADM
AINF
AINT
ASEAN
AORG
ABT
APEC
AY
ASUP
ARF
AGOA
AVIAN
ATRN
ANET
AGIT
ASECVE
ABUD
AODE
ALOW
ADB
AN
ADPM
ASPA
ARABL
AFSN
AZ
AC
AIAG
AFSI
ASCE
ASIG
ACABQ
ADIP
AFGHANISTAN
AROC
ADCO
ACOTA
ANARCHISTS
AMEDCASCKFLO
AK
ARABBL
ASCH
ANTITERRORISM
AGRICULTURE
AOCR
ARR
ASSEMBLY
AORCYM
AFPK
ACKM
AGMT
AEC
APRC
AIN
AFPREL
ASFC
ASECTH
AFSA
AINR
AOPC
AFAF
AFARI
AX
ASECAF
ASECAFIN
AT
AFZAL
APCS
AGAO
AIT
ARCH
AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL
AMEX
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AORCD
AVIATION
ARAS
AINFCY
ACBAQ
AOPR
AREP
AOIC
ASEX
ASEK
AER
AGR
AMCT
AVERY
APR
AEMRS
AFU
AMG
ATPDEA
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AORL
ACS
AMCHAMS
AECL
AUC
ACAO
BA
BR
BB
BG
BEXP
BY
BRUSSELS
BU
BD
BTIO
BK
BL
BE
BMGT
BO
BM
BX
BN
BWC
BBSR
BTT
BC
BH
BILAT
BUSH
BHUM
BT
BTC
BMENA
BOND
BAIO
BP
BF
BRPA
BURNS
BUT
BBG
BCW
BOEHNER
BOL
BASHAR
BIDEN
BFIN
BZ
BEXPC
BTIU
CPAS
CA
CASC
CS
CBW
CIDA
CO
CODEL
CI
CROS
CU
CH
CWC
CMGT
CVIS
CDG
CTR
CG
CF
CHIEF
CJAN
CBSA
CE
CY
CB
CW
CM
CHR
CD
COE
CV
COUNTER
CT
CN
CPUOS
CTERR
CVR
CVPR
CDC
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CONS
COM
CACS
CR
CONTROLS
CAN
CACM
COMMERCE
CAMBODIA
CFIS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITES
CONDOLEEZZA
CZ
CTBT
CEN
CLINTON
CFED
CARC
CTM
CARICOM
CSW
CICTE
CYPRUS
CBE
CMGMT
CARSON
CWCM
CIVS
COUNTRYCLEARANCE
CENTCOM
CAPC
COPUOS
CKGR
CITEL
CQ
CITT
CIC
CARIB
CVIC
CAFTA
CVISU
CDB
CEDAW
CNC
CJUS
COMMAND
CENTER
COL
CAJC
CONSULAR
CLMT
CBC
CIA
CNARC
CIS
CEUDA
CHINA
CAC
CL
DR
DJ
DEMOCRATIC
DEMARCHE
DOMESTIC
DISENGAGEMENT
DB
DA
DHS
DAO
DCM
DAVID
DO
DEAX
DEFENSE
DEA
DTRO
DPRK
DOC
DTRA
DK
DAC
DOD
DRL
DRC
DCG
DE
DOT
DEPT
DOE
DS
DKEM
ECON
ETTC
EFIS
ETRD
EC
EMIN
EAGR
EAID
EFIN
EUN
ECIN
EG
EWWT
EINV
ENRG
ELAB
EPET
EIND
EN
EAIR
EUMEM
ECPS
ES
EI
ELTN
ET
EZ
EU
ER
EINT
ENGR
ECONOMIC
ENIV
EFTA
ETRN
EMS
EUREM
EPA
ESTH
EEB
EET
ENV
EAG
EXIM
ECTRD
ELNT
ENVIRONMENT
ECA
EAP
EINDIR
ETR
ECONOMY
ETRC
ELECTIONS
EICN
EXPORT
EARG
EGHG
EID
ETRO
EINF
EAIDHO
ECIP
EENV
EURM
EPEC
ERNG
ENERG
EIAD
EXBS
ED
EREL
ELAM
EK
EWT
ENGRD
EDEV
ECE
ENGY
EXIMOPIC
ETRDEC
ECCT
EUR
ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID
EFI
ECOSOC
EXTERNAL
ESCAP
ETCC
EENG
ERA
ENRD
ECLAC
ETRAD
EBRD
ENVR
ECONENRG
ELTNSNAR
ELAP
EPIT
EDUC
EAIDXMXAXBXFFR
EETC
EIVN
EDRC
EGOV
ETRA
EAIDRW
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ESA
ETRDGK
ENVI
ELN
EPRT
EPTED
ERTD
EUM
EAIDS
EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM
EDU
EV
EAIDAF
EDA
EPREL
EINVEFIN
EAGER
ETMIN
EUCOM
ECCP
EIDN
EINVKSCA
ENNP
EFINECONCS
ETC
EAIRASECCASCID
EINN
ETRP
ECONOMICS
ENERGY
EIAR
EINDETRD
ECONEFIN
EURN
ETRDEINVTINTCS
EFIM
ETIO
EATO
EIPR
EINVETC
ETTD
ETDR
EIQ
ECONCS
ENRGIZ
EAIG
ENTG
EUC
ERD
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECUN
FR
FI
FOREIGN
FARM
FIR
FAO
FK
FARC
FAS
FJ
FREEDOM
FAC
FINANCE
FBI
FTAA
FM
FCS
FAA
FORCE
FDA
FTA
FT
FCSC
FMGT
FINR
FIN
FDIC
FOR
FOI
FO
FMLN
FISO
GM
GERARD
GT
GA
GG
GR
GTIP
GH
GZ
GE
GB
GY
GAZA
GJ
GEORGE
GOI
GCC
GMUS
GI
GLOBAL
GV
GC
GL
GOV
GKGIC
GF
GWI
GIPNC
GUTIERREZ
GTMO
GANGS
GAERC
GUILLERMO
GASPAR
HR
HA
HYMPSK
HO
HK
HUMAN
HU
HN
HHS
HURI
HUD
HUMRIT
HUMANITARIAN
HUMANR
HL
HSTC
HILLARY
HCOPIL
HADLEY
HOURANI
HI
HUM
HEBRON
HUMOR
IZ
IN
IAEA
IS
IMO
ILO
IR
IC
IT
ITU
ID
IV
IMF
IBRD
IWC
ICAO
ICRC
INF
IO
IPR
ISO
IK
ISRAELI
IQ
ICES
IDB
INFLUENZA
IRAQI
ISCON
IGAD
IRAN
ITALY
IRAQ
ICTY
ICTR
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IQNV
IADB
INTERNAL
INMARSAT
IRDB
ILC
INCB
INRB
ICJ
ISRAEL
INR
IEA
ISPA
ICCAT
IOM
ITRD
IHO
IL
IFAD
ITRA
IDLI
ISCA
INL
INRA
INTELSAT
ISAF
ISPL
IRS
IEF
ITER
INDO
IIP
IND
IEFIN
IACI
IAHRC
INNP
IA
INTERPOL
IFIN
ISSUES
IZPREL
IRAJ
IF
ITPHUM
ITA
IP
IRPE
IDA
ISLAMISTS
ITF
INRO
IBET
IDP
IRC
KMDR
KPAO
KOMC
KNNP
KFLO
KDEM
KSUM
KIPR
KFLU
KE
KCRM
KJUS
KAWC
KZ
KSCA
KDRG
KCOR
KGHG
KPAL
KTIP
KMCA
KCRS
KPKO
KOLY
KRVC
KVPR
KG
KWBG
KTER
KS
KN
KSPR
KWMN
KV
KTFN
KFRD
KU
KSTC
KSTH
KISL
KGIC
KSEP
KFIN
KTEX
KTIA
KUNR
KCMR
KCIP
KMOC
KTDB
KBIO
KBCT
KMPI
KSAF
KACT
KFEM
KPRV
KPWR
KIRC
KCFE
KRIM
KHIV
KHLS
KVIR
KNNNP
KCEM
KLIG
KIRF
KNUP
KSAC
KNUC
KPGOV
KTDD
KIDE
KOMS
KLFU
KNNC
KMFO
KSEO
KJRE
KJUST
KMRS
KSRE
KGIT
KPIR
KPOA
KUWAIT
KIVP
KICC
KSCS
KPOL
KSEAO
KRCM
KSCI
KNAP
KGLB
KICA
KCUL
KPRM
KFSC
KQ
KPOP
KPFO
KPALAOIS
KREC
KBWG
KR
KTTB
KNAR
KCOM
KESS
KINR
KOCI
KWN
KCSY
KREL
KTBT
KFTN
KW
KRFD
KFLOA
KHDP
KNEP
KIND
KHUM
KSKN
KOMO
KDRL
KTFIN
KSOC
KPO
KGIV
KSTCPL
KSI
KPRP
KFPC
KNNB
KNDP
KICCPUR
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KDMR
KFCE
KIMMITT
KMCC
KMNP
KSEC
KOMCSG
KGCC
KRAD
KCRP
KAUST
KWAWC
KCHG
KRDP
KPAS
KTIAPARM
KPAOPREL
KWGB
KIRP
KMIG
KLAB
KSEI
KHSA
KNPP
KPAONZ
KWWW
KGHA
KY
KCRIM
KCRCM
KGCN
KPLS
KIIP
KPAOY
KTRD
KTAO
KJU
KBTS
KWAC
KFIU
KNNO
KPAI
KILS
KPA
KRCS
KWBGSY
KNPPIS
KNNPMNUC
KNPT
KERG
KLTN
KPREL
KTLA
KO
KAWK
KVRP
KAID
KX
KENV
KWCI
KNPR
KCFC
KNEI
KFTFN
KTFM
KCERS
KDEMAF
KMEPI
KEMS
KBTR
KEDU
KIRL
KNNR
KMPT
KPDD
KPIN
KDEV
KFRP
KTBD
KMSG
KWWMN
KWBC
KA
KOM
KWNM
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KRGY
KNNF
KICR
KIFR
KWMNCS
KPAK
KDDG
KCGC
KID
KNSD
KMPF
KWMM
MARR
MX
MASS
MOPS
MNUC
MCAP
MTCRE
MRCRE
MTRE
MASC
MY
MK
MG
MU
MILI
MO
MZ
MEPP
MCC
MEDIA
MOPPS
MI
MAS
MW
MP
MEPN
MV
MD
MR
MC
MCA
MT
MIL
MARITIME
MOPSGRPARM
MAAR
MOOPS
ML
MA
MN
MNUCPTEREZ
MTCR
MUNC
MPOS
MONUC
MGMT
MURRAY
MACP
MINUSTAH
MCCONNELL
MGT
MNUR
MF
MEPI
MOHAMMAD
MAR
MAPP
MNU
MFA
MTS
MLS
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MED
MNVC
MIK
MBM
MILITARY
MAPS
MARAD
MDC
MACEDONIA
MASSMNUC
MUCN
MQADHAFI
MPS
NZ
NATO
NI
NO
NU
NG
NL
NPT
NS
NA
NP
NASA
NSF
NEA
NANCY
NSG
NRR
NATIONAL
NMNUC
NC
NSC
NAS
NARC
NELSON
NATEU
NDP
NIH
NK
NIPP
NR
NERG
NSSP
NE
NTDB
NT
NEGROPONTE
NGO
NATOIRAQ
NAR
NZUS
NCCC
NH
NAFTA
NEW
NRG
NUIN
NOVO
NATOPREL
NV
NICHOLAS
NPA
NSFO
NW
NORAD
NPG
NOAA
OPRC
OPDC
OTRA
OECD
OVIP
OREP
ODC
OIIP
OAS
OSCE
OPIC
OMS
OFDP
OFDA
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OSCI
OM
OPAD
ODPC
OIC
ODIP
OPPI
ORA
OCEA
OREG
OMIG
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXP
OPEC
OFPD
OAU
OCII
OIL
OVIPPRELUNGANU
OSHA
OPCD
OPCR
OF
OFDPQIS
OSIC
OHUM
OTR
OBSP
OGAC
OESC
OVP
ON
OES
OTAR
OCS
PREL
PGOV
PARM
PINR
PHUM
PM
PREF
PTER
PK
PINS
PBIO
PHSA
PE
PBTS
PA
PL
POL
PAK
POV
POLITICS
POLICY
PO
PRELTBIOBA
PKO
PIN
PNAT
PU
PGOVPREL
PALESTINIAN
PTERPGOV
PELOSI
PAS
PP
PTEL
PROP
PRELAF
PRHUM
PRE
PUNE
PIRF
PVOV
PROG
PERSONS
PROV
PKK
PRGOV
PH
PLAB
PDEM
PCI
PRL
PRM
PINSO
PERM
PETR
PPAO
PERL
PBS
PETERS
PRELBR
PCON
POLITICAL
PMIL
POLM
PKPA
PNUM
PLO
PTERM
PJUS
PARMP
PNIR
PHUMKPAL
PG
PREZ
PGIC
PAO
PROTECTION
PRELPK
PGOVENRG
PATTY
PSOC
PARTIES
PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ
PMIG
PAIGH
PARK
PETER
PHUS
PKPO
PGOVECON
POUS
PMAR
PWBG
PAR
PGOVGM
PHUH
PTE
PY
POLUN
PDOV
PGOVSOCI
PGOVPM
PRELEVU
PGOR
PBTSRU
PHUMA
PHUMR
PPD
PGV
PRAM
PARMS
PINL
PSI
PKPAL
PPA
PTERE
PGOF
PINO
PREO
PHAS
PAC
PRESL
PORG
PS
PGVO
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PINT
PRELP
PREFA
PNG
PTBS
PFOR
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PREK
PHJM
POLINT
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PECON
PEACE
PROCESS
PLN
PEDRO
PF
PGPV
PCUL
PGGV
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGIV
PHUMPREL
POGOV
PEL
PBT
PAMQ
PINF
PSEPC
POSTS
PAHO
PHUMPGOV
PGOC
PNR
RS
RP
RU
RW
RFE
RCMP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
REFORM
RO
ROW
ROBERT
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RELATIONS
RAY
ROBERTG
RIGHTS
RM
RATIFICATION
RREL
RBI
RICE
ROOD
REL
RODHAM
RGY
RUEHZO
RELIGIOUS
RELFREE
RUEUN
RELAM
RSP
RF
REO
REGIONAL
RUPREL
RI
REMON
RPEL
RSO
SCUL
SENV
SOCI
SZ
SNAR
SO
SP
SU
SY
SI
SMIG
SYR
SA
SW
SF
SR
SYRIA
SNARM
START
SPECIALIST
SG
SNIG
SCI
SGWI
SE
SIPDIS
SANC
SELAB
SN
SETTLEMENTS
SCIENCE
SENVENV
SENS
SPCE
SPAS
SECURITY
SENC
SOCIETY
SOSI
SENVEAGREAIDTBIOECONSOCIXR
SEN
SPECI
ST
SL
SENVCASCEAIDID
SC
SECRETARY
STR
SNA
SOCIS
SADC
SEP
SK
SHUM
SYAI
SMIL
STEPHEN
SNRV
SKCA
SENSITIVE
SECI
SCUD
SCRM
SGNV
SECTOR
SAARC
SENVSXE
SWMN
STEINBERG
SOPN
SOCR
SCRS
SWE
SARS
SNARIZ
SUDAN
SENVQGR
SAN
SM
SFNV
SSA
SPCVIS
SOFA
SCULKPAOECONTU
SENVKGHG
SHI
SEVN
SH
SNARCS
SNARN
SIPRS
TBIO
TW
TRGY
TSPA
TU
TPHY
TI
TX
TH
TIP
TSPL
TNGD
TZ
TS
TC
TK
TURKEY
TERRORISM
TPSL
TINT
TRSY
TERFIN
TPP
TT
TECHNOLOGY
TE
TAGS
TRAFFICKING
TJ
TN
TO
TD
TP
TREATY
TR
TA
TIO
TECH
TF
TRAD
TNDG
TWI
TPSA
TWL
TAUSCHER
TRBY
TL
TV
THPY
TSPAM
TREL
TRT
TNAR
TFIN
TWCH
THOMMA
THOMAS
TERROR
TRY
TBID
UK
UNESCO
UNSC
UNGA
UN
US
UZ
USEU
UG
UP
UNAUS
UNMIK
USTR
UY
USUN
UNEP
UNDC
UV
UNPUOS
UNSCR
USAID
UNODC
UNRCR
UNHCR
UNDP
UNCRIME
UA
UNHRC
UNRWA
UNO
UNCND
UNCHR
USAU
UNICEF
USPS
UNOMIG
UNESCOSCULPRELPHUMKPALCUIRXFVEKV
UR
UNFICYP
UNCITRAL
UNAMA
UNVIE
USTDA
USNC
UNCSD
USCC
UNEF
UNGAPL
USSC
UNMIC
UNTAC
UNCLASSIFIED
USDA
UNCTAD
USGS
UNFPA
UNSE
USOAS
UE
UAE
UNCHS
UNDESCO
UNC
UNSCS
UKXG
UNGACG
UNHR
UNBRO
UNCHC
UNFCYP
UNIDROIT
WHTI
WIPO
WTRO
WHO
WTO
WMO
WFP
WEET
WS
WE
WA
WHA
WBG
WILLIAM
WI
WSIS
WCL
WEBZ
WZ
WW
WWBG
WMD
WWT
WMN
WWARD
WITH
WTRQ
WCO
WEU
WB
WBEG
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 06HONGKONG1082, A Primer for Hong Kong Power Reforms
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06HONGKONG1082.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
06HONGKONG1082 | 2006-03-16 01:41 | 2011-08-23 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Consulate Hong Kong |
VZCZCXRO0599
RR RUEHCN
DE RUEHHK #1082/01 0750141
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 160141Z MAR 06 ZDK
FM AMCONSUL HONG KONG
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 5507
INFO RUEHOO/CHINA POSTS COLLECTIVE
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHDC
RHMFIUU/DEPT OF ENERGY WASHINGTON DC
RUEAEPA/HQ EPA WASHDC
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 04 HONG KONG 001082
SIPDIS
STATE for OES, OES/EGC, OES/PCI, EB/ESC/IEC and EAP/CM
USDOE for SKelly, International/Pumphrey/Price
USDOE for Fossil Energy/Swift/McKee
USDOC for NOAA/Office of Global Programs
HQEPA for International/Thompson
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ENRG SENV KSCA ECON BTIO TRGY CH HK
SUBJECT: A Primer for Hong Kong Power Reforms
Ref: Hong Kong 1976
HONG KONG 00001082 001.2 OF 004
¶1. (SBU) Summary: In late December 2005, the Hong Kong
Government (HKG) proposed to reform the Scheme of Control
Agreements (SCAs) governing Hong Kong's electricity market
to lower the rates of return to both of Hong Kong's power
companies, Hong Kong Electric (HKE) and China Light and
Power (CLP). (CLP is a joint venture with ExxonMobil and
represents the largest U.S. investment in Hong Kong.) The
reforms also aim to open the door to new investors,
strengthen compliance with Hong Kong's environmental
regulations, and minimize the development of excess
generation capacity. This cable follows up on reftel with an
analysis of the potential benefits and risks of the key new
proposals. Given public perceptions that the power companies
are responsible for much of Hong Kong's air pollution and
that electricity prices in Hong Kong are excessively high,
we assess that the HKG is in a strong negotiating position
to achieve its goals. However, we caution that the HKG's
proposals, if fully adopted, have the potential to lower the
reliability of Hong Kong's electricity service and may not
achieve the lower tariffs and environmental benefits the HKG
is seeking. There are four clear benefit/risk scenarios
that can be drawn from the HKG proposals: (a) reduced rates
of return after 2008 and more frequent tariff reviews could
lead to lower electricity rates but also to a commensurate
(and offsetting) increase in the financial risks faced by
the power companies; (b) linking the power companies' rates
of return to their achievement of emission reduction targets
could strengthen compliance with environmental controls but
could skew investment decisions; (c) tightly controlling
"excessive investment" on generation facilities could
prevent the power companies from unnecessary spending for
the sake of greater returns but could also deter necessary
new investments; (d) opening Hong Kong's electricity sector
to new investors and power supply from Mainland China over
the long term could introduce competition and flexibility
into the power generation market but risk damaging the
reliability of Hong Kong's power supply. End Summary.
Overview
---------
¶2. (SBU) On December 30, 2005, the Hong Kong Economic
Development and Labour Bureau (EDLB) issued a Stage II
Consultation Paper that laid out the HKG's proposed reforms
to the electricity sector (see reftel). Those proposals
come in advance of the expiration in 2008 of the 15-year
bilateral Scheme of Control Agreements (SCAs) between the
HKG and the two power companies, HKE and CLP. ExxonMobil is
a joint-venture partner with CLP through the Castle Peak
Power Company. The HKG expects to issue its final proposal
for electricity reforms by the end of 2006, which will
become the basis for its negotiations with HKE and CLP. If
negotiations do not lead to a mutually agreeable solution by
the end of 2008, the HKG is likely to extend the existing
SCAs in the interim. Overall, the HKG proposes to continue
the current regulatory system of bilateral contracts, which
has historically allowed Hong Kong to enjoy a 99.99%
reliable supply of electricity - meaning that Hong Kong
enjoys one of the most reliable supplies of electricity in
the world. However, the HKG has also responded to
criticisms that the SCAs' inflexible terms have led to
excess returns over-investment by proposing lower permitted
rates of returns, tighter regulatory controls and the
possibility of increased competition.
Lower Proposed Returns to the Power Companies
--------------------------------------------- -
¶3. (SBU) The HKG has proposed lowering the permitted rate of
return on fixed assets to 7-11% from 13.5% (15% for assets
financed by shareholder funds). Instead of a flat rate
return on all assets, as is currently the case, the HKG
proposes an integrated approach that sets the rate of return
based on the risk-adjusted costs of raising capital, to be
re-evaluated every 5 years to reflect prevailing economic
conditions. Furthermore, the HKG has proposed varying the
rate of return for different types of assets (generation,
transmission, distribution, renewable energy, etc). Miranda
Chiu, advisor to the EDLB on energy policy and the HKG on
the proposed electricity reforms, said: "In Hong Kong,
HONG KONG 00001082 002.2 OF 004
people strongly believe that returns [to the power
companies] are exorbitantly high. Interest rates have
fallen since the agreements were signed 15 years ago."
According to Chiu, the companies are able to finance their
investments for significantly less than they receive from
the fixed rate of return, allowing them to earn excess
returns. (When the last SCAs were signed in 1993, the
prevailing interest rate was 6.5%; since then, it has fallen
as low as 5.0% and has moved as high as 10.0%. As of January
2006, it was 7.75% and rates were trending upwards.)
¶4. (SBU) EDLB Secretary Stephen Ip commented after the
proposals were released that the actual level of permitted
rate of return would likely be about 9-10%, leading to a 10-
20% reduction in power tariffs. The Hong Kong Legislative
Council added its voice to the debate on February 15, 2006,
by voting 44-3 to cap HKE and CLP's rate of return on fixed
assets at 7%. Since the SCAs are bilateral contracts not
governed by legislation, the vote was non-binding on the HKG
but indicated the public's disapproval of high electricity
rates.
¶5. (SBU) The HKG's proposed rate reduction took the power
companies and securities analysts by surprise. CLP
expressed "grave concerns" that the HKG's proposed return
levels were too low to support reliable and safe power and
environmental responsibility, while HKE called the proposed
reductions "drastic." According to Betty Yuen, managing
director for CLP: "The proposed return level fails to
recognize the fundamental nature of the industry and the
mount of risk undertaken by the power companies. If returns
are not set at appropriate levels, the public will end up
bearing the risks of insufficient investment." In its
defense, CLP noted that it had not raised electricity
tariffs for the past 8 years. HKE recently raised its
average net tariff by 7.2%, effective January 1, 2006, but
stressed that it had voluntarily foregone over HK$2 billion
(about USD 258 million) in permitted profits between 2003
and 2005 through various rebates.
¶6. (SBU) ExxonMobil Energy Limited Chairman Brad Corson said
that the proposed rate of return was not consistent with the
investment risks faced by the power companies. He pointed
out that the proposals could result in as much as a 50%
reduction in potential returns while asking investors to
face increased uncertainty with market opening proposals,
greater scrutiny on capital investments, and unspecified
penalties for failing to meet new environmental provisions.
¶7. (SBU) Democratic Party (DP) Legislator Fred Li told
Econoff that a 9% or 10% rate of return was a "realistic and
fair" number, pointing out that even pro-business Legco
members like the Liberal Party's James Tien had strongly
supported a 7% rate of return. Li opined that pressure from
the public and from Legco will keep the HKG from
compromising on the proposed rate of return, thus forcing
the power companies to grudgingly accept a 9% or 10% overall
rate of return. Hong Kong Environmental Protection
Department (EPD) Deputy Director Roy Tang said that the
power companies had "overplayed their hand," particularly
regarding public opinion, and were thus in a very weak
bargaining position vis-a-vis the HKG in the upcoming
negotiations.
¶8. (SBU) JP Morgan's Edmond Lee said in a report that the
lower rates of return would provide little incentive for the
power companies to invest in new facilities. While he
expected that the HKG would need to achieve some tariff cuts
in order to "save face" with the public, he expected that
the negotiated effective rate of return would be closer to
the top end of the proposed range. However, Alice Hui of
UBS Securities believes that the HKG will have the upper
hand in future negotiations: "We think the two Hong Kong
power companies will be fighting an uphill battle to
convince both the government and the public that they need
to have a return of at least 10% to continue their
substantial investment in Hong Kong."
Returns Tied to Achievement of Emission Targets
--------------------------------------------- ---
¶9. (SBU) According to EPD figures, power generation
HONG KONG 00001082 003.2 OF 004
facilities emit 92% of the sulphur dioxide and half of the
nitrogen oxides in Hong Kong. Between 1997 and 2004, the
emission of sulphur dioxide by power generation increased as
much as 60%. In 2002, the Hong Kong and Guangdong
provincial governments agreed to reduce, on a best efforts
basis, the emissions of sulphur dioxide, nitrogen oxide,
respirable suspended particulates and volatile organic
compounds by 40%, 20%, 55% and 55%, respectively, by 2010,
as compared to 1997 levels. To ensure that the power
companies fully comply with the 2010 emission caps, the HKG
has proposed linking the permitted rate of return on all
fixed assets to the ability of the power companies to meet
the emission targets. CLP has complained that the HKG
cannot include such a provision in the next SCAs without
first laying out a long-term energy policy that gives the
power companies an idea of what they will be required to do
post-2010. Alice Hui of UBS commented in a recent report
that "unless the two Hong Kong power companies are able to
close down all their existing coal-fired power plants and
switch to natural gas-fired generation, we think it would be
difficult for them to reduce respirable-suspended
particulates [to the target level]. As a result, we believe
that there will be no other alternatives for the two power
companies to avoid the emission trading costs and penalty
charges for not meeting the emission caps."
¶10. (SBU) Environmental organization Friends of the Earth
(FOE) stated that the SCA consultation papers could not
serve as a substitute for a proper energy policy, a policy
which should at least include: solid plans for renewables
application, management of energy consumption,
diversification of energy sources and the consideration of
environmental performance when deciding the rate of return.
¶11. (SBU) ExxonMobil Chairman Brad Corson thought it was
inconsistent of the HKG to require the power companies to
meet strict emissions targets and then set the lowest
proposed rate of return (7%) for emissions control
investments. Why, he asked, is the HKG creating such a
strong disincentive for the power companies to invest more
heavily in emissions control measures? Corson flatly
rejected the HKG's proposal to link the overall rate of
return to performance in meeting emissions caps. He
concluded that it is "unacceptable" for CLP's returns to be
affected by emissions targets that the HKG can arbitrarily
set without any regard for scientific, technical, or
practical considerations.
¶12. (SBU) DP Legislator Fred Li, on the other hand, felt
that the power companies were "lucky" to gain any return on
emissions investments at all. Hong Kong should operate on a
"polluters pay" principle, he continued, so the power
companies should pay for their pollution by shouldering the
full cost of meeting the HKG set emissions caps. However,
Li said that the link between emissions performance and the
overall rate of return was the single issue on which he
believed the HKG was willing to compromise. He concluded
that the power companies would never agree to annual reviews
of their overall rates of return based upon their emissions
performance and that the HKG would probably find another way
to financially penalize power companies for failure to meet
emissions targets.
¶13. (SBU) EPD Deputy Director Roy Tang was more confident
about the HKG's ability to prevail in all of its negotiating
positions. Tang discussed the February 14, 2006 death of a
Hong Kong citizen who had participated in the Hong Kong
Marathon on a particularly polluted day. Tang admitted that
it was impossible to directly link the death of the man, who
had a history of respiratory illnesses, to the air
pollution. However, he continued, the Hong Kong public will
long remember the images of marathon participants wearing
oxygen masks against a grey backdrop of pollution-induced
haze and "draw their own conclusions" about the pollution in
Hong Kong. Tang felt that with the public's support the
HKG's negotiating position is sufficiently strong that, if
the power companies are not careful, they could walk away
from the SCA talks with "completely empty hands."
Controlling "Excessive Expenditures"
-------------------------------------
HONG KONG 00001082 004 OF 004
¶14. (SBU) Responding to concerns that the power companies
have historically taken advantage of the fixed rate of
return to over-invest in capacity, the HKG has proposed
deducting 100% of any capital expenditures on generation
facility machinery and equipment found to be "excessive"
from the rate base. Currently, the HKG has the ability to
deduct a portion of the "excess" capital expenditures (40%
for CLP and 50% for HEC). However, even the HKG recognized
in its proposal that such a high exclusion rate could damage
Hong Kong's supply reliability by further weakening the
power companies' incentive to invest based on anticipated
changes in demand.
¶15. (SBU) DP Legislator Fred Li admitted to Econoff that the
HKG proposal to monitor the capital expenditures of the
power companies was "difficult at best." He pointed out
that the HKG did not have enough technically proficient
officials who could make the admittedly subjective
determination as to what construed an "excessive"
investment. Instead, continued Li, the HKG should set up a
semi-independent regulatory body for the energy market along
the lines of the Office of the Telecommunications Authority
(OFTA) and contract out positions to experts in the energy
field to deal with difficult technical issues.
Proposal to Open the Hong Kong Power Network
---------------------------------------------
¶16. (SBU) Although HKE and CLP have defacto service areas in
Hong Kong, neither has a franchise and the power sector has
technically always been open for competition. However, the
fact that the two power companies are vertically integrated,
combined with Hong Kong's small size and the limited
availability of new sites for generation facilities, has
thus far prevented any serious new suppliers from emerging.
With its latest proposal, the HKG confirmed its intention to
pave the way for new sources of supply by developing
regulatory arrangements that allow third-party access to the
power network and increased interconnection. While the HKG
is not advocating introducing greater competition in the
near term, it hopes its proposals will encourage more
suppliers of renewable energy to build in Hong Kong, and
will allow Hong Kong to benefit from any future surplus
electricity from mainland China. However, given China's own
electricity shortages in recent years, the HKG is cautious
about relying on the mainland for electricity. One key
question will be whether Hong Kong power companies are
willing to open up their transmission and distribution
networks.
¶17. (SBU) ExxonMobil Chairman Brad Corson opined that the
HKG needs to establish principles for opening Hong Kong's
power market. All players should have access to a level
playing field and be subject to equivalent environmental
standards and enforcement, uniform rights and
responsibilities, and reciprocal market access. Corson
warned that the current unclear policy toward market
entrants may lead to disorder in the Hong Kong power market
and possibly subject "clean power generators" in Hong Kong
to unfair competition from cheap coal-burning power
generators in mainland China.
¶18. (SBU) DP Legislator Fred Li said that although it is not
realistic to expect real competition in the Hong Kong power
market "any time soon," the establishment of an independent
energy regulatory body could speed up this process
significantly. The regulatory body could ensure that
companies applying for access into the Hong Kong power
market adhere to Hong Kong environmental standards and also
provide for access to the Hong Kong power grid at
established and regulated fees. Li admitted that the
creation of a complete new bureaucracy would create many
extra costs for the HKG but felt strongly that it would lead
to a freer, more robust, and responsible power generating
system in Hong Kong.
CUNNINGHAM