

Currently released so far... 51122 / 251,287
Articles
Brazil
Sri Lanka
United Kingdom
Sweden
00. Editorial
United States
Latin America
Egypt
Jordan
Yemen
Thailand
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
2011/05/18
2011/05/19
2011/05/20
2011/05/21
2011/05/22
2011/05/23
2011/05/24
2011/05/25
2011/05/26
2011/05/27
2011/05/28
2011/05/29
2011/05/30
2011/05/31
2011/06/01
2011/06/02
2011/06/03
2011/06/04
2011/06/05
2011/06/06
2011/06/07
2011/06/08
2011/06/09
2011/06/10
2011/06/11
2011/06/12
2011/06/13
2011/06/14
2011/06/15
2011/06/16
2011/06/17
2011/06/18
2011/06/19
2011/06/20
2011/06/21
2011/06/22
2011/06/23
2011/06/24
2011/06/25
2011/06/26
2011/06/27
2011/06/28
2011/06/29
2011/06/30
2011/07/01
2011/07/02
2011/07/04
2011/07/05
2011/07/06
2011/07/07
2011/07/08
2011/07/10
2011/07/11
2011/07/12
2011/07/13
2011/07/14
2011/07/15
2011/07/16
2011/07/17
2011/07/18
2011/07/19
2011/07/20
2011/07/21
2011/07/22
2011/07/23
2011/07/25
2011/07/27
2011/07/28
2011/07/29
2011/07/31
2011/08/01
2011/08/02
2011/08/03
2011/08/05
2011/08/06
2011/08/07
2011/08/08
2011/08/09
2011/08/10
2011/08/11
2011/08/12
2011/08/13
2011/08/15
2011/08/16
2011/08/17
2011/08/18
2011/08/19
2011/08/21
2011/08/22
2011/08/23
2011/08/24
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Antananarivo
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Alexandria
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embasy Bonn
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Brazzaville
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangui
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Belfast
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Cotonou
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chiang Mai
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Chengdu
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
DIR FSINFATC
Consulate Dusseldorf
Consulate Durban
Consulate Dubai
Consulate Dhahran
Embassy Guatemala
Embassy Grenada
Embassy Georgetown
Embassy Gaborone
Consulate Guayaquil
Consulate Guangzhou
Consulate Guadalajara
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Hong Kong
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kolonia
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Krakow
Consulate Kolkata
Consulate Karachi
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Lusaka
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Lome
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy Libreville
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Leipzig
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Mission Geneva
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Mogadishu
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maseru
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Merida
Consulate Melbourne
Consulate Matamoros
Consulate Marseille
Embassy Nouakchott
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Nuevo Laredo
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Consulate Nagoya
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Praia
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Moresby
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Podgorica
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Hillah
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Surabaya
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy Tirana
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
Consulate Thessaloniki
USUN New York
USMISSION USTR GENEVA
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Mission CD Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
UN Rome
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vientiane
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AMGT
ASEC
AEMR
AR
APECO
AU
AORC
ADANA
AJ
AF
AFIN
AMED
AS
AM
ABLD
AFFAIRS
AMB
APER
ACOA
AND
AA
AE
AADP
AID
AO
AL
AG
AORD
ADM
AINF
AINT
ASEAN
AORG
ABT
APEC
AY
ASUP
ARF
AGOA
AVIAN
ATRN
ANET
AGIT
ASECVE
ABUD
AODE
ALOW
ADB
AN
ADPM
ASPA
ARABL
AFSN
AZ
AC
AIAG
AFSI
ASCE
ASIG
ACABQ
ADIP
AFGHANISTAN
AROC
ADCO
ACOTA
ANARCHISTS
AMEDCASCKFLO
AK
ARABBL
ASCH
ANTITERRORISM
AGRICULTURE
AOCR
ARR
ASSEMBLY
AORCYM
AFPK
ACKM
AGMT
AEC
APRC
AIN
AFPREL
ASFC
ASECTH
AFSA
AINR
AOPC
AFAF
AFARI
AX
ASECAF
ASECAFIN
AT
AFZAL
APCS
AGAO
AIT
ARCH
AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL
AMEX
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AORCD
AVIATION
ARAS
AINFCY
ACBAQ
AOPR
AREP
AOIC
ASEX
ASEK
AER
AGR
AMCT
AVERY
APR
AEMRS
AFU
AMG
ATPDEA
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AORL
ACS
AMCHAMS
AECL
AUC
ACAO
BA
BR
BB
BG
BEXP
BY
BRUSSELS
BU
BD
BTIO
BK
BL
BE
BMGT
BO
BM
BX
BN
BWC
BBSR
BTT
BC
BH
BILAT
BUSH
BHUM
BT
BTC
BMENA
BOND
BAIO
BP
BF
BRPA
BURNS
BUT
BBG
BCW
BOEHNER
BOL
BASHAR
BIDEN
BFIN
BZ
BEXPC
BTIU
CPAS
CA
CASC
CS
CBW
CIDA
CO
CODEL
CI
CROS
CU
CH
CWC
CMGT
CVIS
CDG
CTR
CG
CF
CHIEF
CJAN
CBSA
CE
CY
CB
CW
CM
CHR
CD
COE
CV
COUNTER
CT
CN
CPUOS
CTERR
CVR
CVPR
CDC
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CONS
COM
CACS
CR
CONTROLS
CAN
CACM
COMMERCE
CAMBODIA
CFIS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITES
CONDOLEEZZA
CZ
CTBT
CEN
CLINTON
CFED
CARC
CTM
CARICOM
CSW
CICTE
CYPRUS
CBE
CMGMT
CARSON
CWCM
CIVS
COUNTRYCLEARANCE
CENTCOM
CAPC
COPUOS
CKGR
CITEL
CQ
CITT
CIC
CARIB
CVIC
CAFTA
CVISU
CDB
CEDAW
CNC
CJUS
COMMAND
CENTER
COL
CAJC
CONSULAR
CLMT
CBC
CIA
CNARC
CIS
CEUDA
CHINA
CAC
CL
DR
DJ
DEMOCRATIC
DEMARCHE
DOMESTIC
DISENGAGEMENT
DB
DA
DHS
DAO
DCM
DAVID
DO
DEAX
DEFENSE
DEA
DTRO
DPRK
DOC
DTRA
DK
DAC
DOD
DRL
DRC
DCG
DE
DOT
DEPT
DOE
DS
DKEM
ECON
ETTC
EFIS
ETRD
EC
EMIN
EAGR
EAID
EFIN
EUN
ECIN
EG
EWWT
EINV
ENRG
ELAB
EPET
EIND
EN
EAIR
EUMEM
ECPS
ES
EI
ELTN
ET
EZ
EU
ER
EINT
ENGR
ECONOMIC
ENIV
EFTA
ETRN
EMS
EUREM
EPA
ESTH
EEB
EET
ENV
EAG
EXIM
ECTRD
ELNT
ENVIRONMENT
ECA
EAP
EINDIR
ETR
ECONOMY
ETRC
ELECTIONS
EICN
EXPORT
EARG
EGHG
EID
ETRO
EINF
EAIDHO
ECIP
EENV
EURM
EPEC
ERNG
ENERG
EIAD
EXBS
ED
EREL
ELAM
EK
EWT
ENGRD
EDEV
ECE
ENGY
EXIMOPIC
ETRDEC
ECCT
EUR
ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID
EFI
ECOSOC
EXTERNAL
ESCAP
ETCC
EENG
ERA
ENRD
ECLAC
ETRAD
EBRD
ENVR
ECONENRG
ELTNSNAR
ELAP
EPIT
EDUC
EAIDXMXAXBXFFR
EETC
EIVN
EDRC
EGOV
ETRA
EAIDRW
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ESA
ETRDGK
ENVI
ELN
EPRT
EPTED
ERTD
EUM
EAIDS
EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM
EDU
EV
EAIDAF
EDA
EPREL
EINVEFIN
EAGER
ETMIN
EUCOM
ECCP
EIDN
EINVKSCA
ENNP
EFINECONCS
ETC
EAIRASECCASCID
EINN
ETRP
ECONOMICS
ENERGY
EIAR
EINDETRD
ECONEFIN
EURN
ETRDEINVTINTCS
EFIM
ETIO
EATO
EIPR
EINVETC
ETTD
ETDR
EIQ
ECONCS
ENRGIZ
EAIG
ENTG
EUC
ERD
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECUN
FR
FI
FOREIGN
FARM
FIR
FAO
FK
FARC
FAS
FJ
FREEDOM
FAC
FINANCE
FBI
FTAA
FM
FCS
FAA
FORCE
FDA
FTA
FT
FCSC
FMGT
FINR
FIN
FDIC
FOR
FOI
FO
FMLN
FISO
GM
GERARD
GT
GA
GG
GR
GTIP
GH
GZ
GE
GB
GY
GAZA
GJ
GEORGE
GOI
GCC
GMUS
GI
GLOBAL
GV
GC
GL
GOV
GKGIC
GF
GWI
GIPNC
GUTIERREZ
GTMO
GANGS
GAERC
GUILLERMO
GASPAR
HR
HA
HYMPSK
HO
HK
HUMAN
HU
HN
HHS
HURI
HUD
HUMRIT
HUMANITARIAN
HUMANR
HL
HSTC
HILLARY
HCOPIL
HADLEY
HOURANI
HI
HUM
HEBRON
HUMOR
IZ
IN
IAEA
IS
IMO
ILO
IR
IC
IT
ITU
ID
IV
IMF
IBRD
IWC
ICAO
ICRC
INF
IO
IPR
ISO
IK
ISRAELI
IQ
ICES
IDB
INFLUENZA
IRAQI
ISCON
IGAD
IRAN
ITALY
IRAQ
ICTY
ICTR
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IQNV
IADB
INTERNAL
INMARSAT
IRDB
ILC
INCB
INRB
ICJ
ISRAEL
INR
IEA
ISPA
ICCAT
IOM
ITRD
IHO
IL
IFAD
ITRA
IDLI
ISCA
INL
INRA
INTELSAT
ISAF
ISPL
IRS
IEF
ITER
INDO
IIP
IND
IEFIN
IACI
IAHRC
INNP
IA
INTERPOL
IFIN
ISSUES
IZPREL
IRAJ
IF
ITPHUM
ITA
IP
IRPE
IDA
ISLAMISTS
ITF
INRO
IBET
IDP
IRC
KMDR
KPAO
KOMC
KNNP
KFLO
KDEM
KSUM
KIPR
KFLU
KE
KCRM
KJUS
KAWC
KZ
KSCA
KDRG
KCOR
KGHG
KPAL
KTIP
KMCA
KCRS
KPKO
KOLY
KRVC
KVPR
KG
KWBG
KTER
KS
KN
KSPR
KWMN
KV
KTFN
KFRD
KU
KSTC
KSTH
KISL
KGIC
KSEP
KFIN
KTEX
KTIA
KUNR
KCMR
KCIP
KMOC
KTDB
KBIO
KBCT
KMPI
KSAF
KACT
KFEM
KPRV
KPWR
KIRC
KCFE
KRIM
KHIV
KHLS
KVIR
KNNNP
KCEM
KLIG
KIRF
KNUP
KSAC
KNUC
KPGOV
KTDD
KIDE
KOMS
KLFU
KNNC
KMFO
KSEO
KJRE
KJUST
KMRS
KSRE
KGIT
KPIR
KPOA
KUWAIT
KIVP
KICC
KSCS
KPOL
KSEAO
KRCM
KSCI
KNAP
KGLB
KICA
KCUL
KPRM
KFSC
KQ
KPOP
KPFO
KPALAOIS
KREC
KBWG
KR
KTTB
KNAR
KCOM
KESS
KINR
KOCI
KWN
KCSY
KREL
KTBT
KFTN
KW
KRFD
KFLOA
KHDP
KNEP
KIND
KHUM
KSKN
KOMO
KDRL
KTFIN
KSOC
KPO
KGIV
KSTCPL
KSI
KPRP
KFPC
KNNB
KNDP
KICCPUR
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KDMR
KFCE
KIMMITT
KMCC
KMNP
KSEC
KOMCSG
KGCC
KRAD
KCRP
KAUST
KWAWC
KCHG
KRDP
KPAS
KTIAPARM
KPAOPREL
KWGB
KIRP
KMIG
KLAB
KSEI
KHSA
KNPP
KPAONZ
KWWW
KGHA
KY
KCRIM
KCRCM
KGCN
KPLS
KIIP
KPAOY
KTRD
KTAO
KJU
KBTS
KWAC
KFIU
KNNO
KPAI
KILS
KPA
KRCS
KWBGSY
KNPPIS
KNNPMNUC
KNPT
KERG
KLTN
KPREL
KTLA
KO
KAWK
KVRP
KAID
KX
KENV
KWCI
KNPR
KCFC
KNEI
KFTFN
KTFM
KCERS
KDEMAF
KMEPI
KEMS
KBTR
KEDU
KIRL
KNNR
KMPT
KPDD
KPIN
KDEV
KFRP
KTBD
KMSG
KWWMN
KWBC
KA
KOM
KWNM
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KRGY
KNNF
KICR
KIFR
KWMNCS
KPAK
KDDG
KCGC
KID
KNSD
KMPF
KWMM
MARR
MX
MASS
MOPS
MNUC
MCAP
MTCRE
MRCRE
MTRE
MASC
MY
MK
MG
MU
MILI
MO
MZ
MEPP
MCC
MEDIA
MOPPS
MI
MAS
MW
MP
MEPN
MV
MD
MR
MC
MCA
MT
MIL
MARITIME
MOPSGRPARM
MAAR
MOOPS
ML
MA
MN
MNUCPTEREZ
MTCR
MUNC
MPOS
MONUC
MGMT
MURRAY
MACP
MINUSTAH
MCCONNELL
MGT
MNUR
MF
MEPI
MOHAMMAD
MAR
MAPP
MNU
MFA
MTS
MLS
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MED
MNVC
MIK
MBM
MILITARY
MAPS
MARAD
MDC
MACEDONIA
MASSMNUC
MUCN
MQADHAFI
MPS
NZ
NATO
NI
NO
NU
NG
NL
NPT
NS
NA
NP
NASA
NSF
NEA
NANCY
NSG
NRR
NATIONAL
NMNUC
NC
NSC
NAS
NARC
NELSON
NATEU
NDP
NIH
NK
NIPP
NR
NERG
NSSP
NE
NTDB
NT
NEGROPONTE
NGO
NATOIRAQ
NAR
NZUS
NCCC
NH
NAFTA
NEW
NRG
NUIN
NOVO
NATOPREL
NV
NICHOLAS
NPA
NSFO
NW
NORAD
NPG
NOAA
OPRC
OPDC
OTRA
OECD
OVIP
OREP
ODC
OIIP
OAS
OSCE
OPIC
OMS
OFDP
OFDA
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OSCI
OM
OPAD
ODPC
OIC
ODIP
OPPI
ORA
OCEA
OREG
OMIG
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXP
OPEC
OFPD
OAU
OCII
OIL
OVIPPRELUNGANU
OSHA
OPCD
OPCR
OF
OFDPQIS
OSIC
OHUM
OTR
OBSP
OGAC
OESC
OVP
ON
OES
OTAR
OCS
PREL
PGOV
PARM
PINR
PHUM
PM
PREF
PTER
PK
PINS
PBIO
PHSA
PE
PBTS
PA
PL
POL
PAK
POV
POLITICS
POLICY
PO
PRELTBIOBA
PKO
PIN
PNAT
PU
PGOVPREL
PALESTINIAN
PTERPGOV
PELOSI
PAS
PP
PTEL
PROP
PRELAF
PRHUM
PRE
PUNE
PIRF
PVOV
PROG
PERSONS
PROV
PKK
PRGOV
PH
PLAB
PDEM
PCI
PRL
PRM
PINSO
PERM
PETR
PPAO
PERL
PBS
PETERS
PRELBR
PCON
POLITICAL
PMIL
POLM
PKPA
PNUM
PLO
PTERM
PJUS
PARMP
PNIR
PHUMKPAL
PG
PREZ
PGIC
PAO
PROTECTION
PRELPK
PGOVENRG
PATTY
PSOC
PARTIES
PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ
PMIG
PAIGH
PARK
PETER
PHUS
PKPO
PGOVECON
POUS
PMAR
PWBG
PAR
PGOVGM
PHUH
PTE
PY
POLUN
PDOV
PGOVSOCI
PGOVPM
PRELEVU
PGOR
PBTSRU
PHUMA
PHUMR
PPD
PGV
PRAM
PARMS
PINL
PSI
PKPAL
PPA
PTERE
PGOF
PINO
PREO
PHAS
PAC
PRESL
PORG
PS
PGVO
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PINT
PRELP
PREFA
PNG
PTBS
PFOR
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PREK
PHJM
POLINT
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PECON
PEACE
PROCESS
PLN
PEDRO
PF
PGPV
PCUL
PGGV
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGIV
PHUMPREL
POGOV
PEL
PBT
PAMQ
PINF
PSEPC
POSTS
PAHO
PHUMPGOV
PGOC
PNR
RS
RP
RU
RW
RFE
RCMP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
REFORM
RO
ROW
ROBERT
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RELATIONS
RAY
ROBERTG
RIGHTS
RM
RATIFICATION
RREL
RBI
RICE
ROOD
REL
RODHAM
RGY
RUEHZO
RELIGIOUS
RELFREE
RUEUN
RELAM
RSP
RF
REO
REGIONAL
RUPREL
RI
REMON
RPEL
RSO
SCUL
SENV
SOCI
SZ
SNAR
SO
SP
SU
SY
SI
SMIG
SYR
SA
SW
SF
SR
SYRIA
SNARM
START
SPECIALIST
SG
SNIG
SCI
SGWI
SE
SIPDIS
SANC
SELAB
SN
SETTLEMENTS
SCIENCE
SENVENV
SENS
SPCE
SPAS
SECURITY
SENC
SOCIETY
SOSI
SENVEAGREAIDTBIOECONSOCIXR
SEN
SPECI
ST
SL
SENVCASCEAIDID
SC
SECRETARY
STR
SNA
SOCIS
SADC
SEP
SK
SHUM
SYAI
SMIL
STEPHEN
SNRV
SKCA
SENSITIVE
SECI
SCUD
SCRM
SGNV
SECTOR
SAARC
SENVSXE
SWMN
STEINBERG
SOPN
SOCR
SCRS
SWE
SARS
SNARIZ
SUDAN
SENVQGR
SAN
SM
SFNV
SSA
SPCVIS
SOFA
SCULKPAOECONTU
SENVKGHG
SHI
SEVN
SH
SNARCS
SNARN
SIPRS
TBIO
TW
TRGY
TSPA
TU
TPHY
TI
TX
TH
TIP
TSPL
TNGD
TZ
TS
TC
TK
TURKEY
TERRORISM
TPSL
TINT
TRSY
TERFIN
TPP
TT
TECHNOLOGY
TE
TAGS
TRAFFICKING
TJ
TN
TO
TD
TP
TREATY
TR
TA
TIO
TECH
TF
TRAD
TNDG
TWI
TPSA
TWL
TAUSCHER
TRBY
TL
TV
THPY
TSPAM
TREL
TRT
TNAR
TFIN
TWCH
THOMMA
THOMAS
TERROR
TRY
TBID
UK
UNESCO
UNSC
UNGA
UN
US
UZ
USEU
UG
UP
UNAUS
UNMIK
USTR
UY
USUN
UNEP
UNDC
UV
UNPUOS
UNSCR
USAID
UNODC
UNRCR
UNHCR
UNDP
UNCRIME
UA
UNHRC
UNRWA
UNO
UNCND
UNCHR
USAU
UNICEF
USPS
UNOMIG
UNESCOSCULPRELPHUMKPALCUIRXFVEKV
UR
UNFICYP
UNCITRAL
UNAMA
UNVIE
USTDA
USNC
UNCSD
USCC
UNEF
UNGAPL
USSC
UNMIC
UNTAC
UNCLASSIFIED
USDA
UNCTAD
USGS
UNFPA
UNSE
USOAS
UE
UAE
UNCHS
UNDESCO
UNC
UNSCS
UKXG
UNGACG
UNHR
UNBRO
UNCHC
UNFCYP
UNIDROIT
WHTI
WIPO
WTRO
WHO
WTO
WMO
WFP
WEET
WS
WE
WA
WHA
WBG
WILLIAM
WI
WSIS
WCL
WEBZ
WZ
WW
WWBG
WMD
WWT
WMN
WWARD
WITH
WTRQ
WCO
WEU
WB
WBEG
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 08PARIS1029, UNESCO SPRING EXECUTIVE BOARD: POLITICAL ISSUES
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08PARIS1029.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
08PARIS1029 | 2008-05-30 09:09 | 2011-08-24 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Paris |
VZCZCXRO6718
RR RUEHAP RUEHFL RUEHGI RUEHGR RUEHKN RUEHKR RUEHMA RUEHMJ RUEHMR
RUEHPA RUEHPB RUEHQU RUEHRN
DE RUEHFR #1029/01 1510909
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 300909Z MAY 08
FM AMEMBASSY PARIS
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 3203
INFO RUCNSCO/UNESCO COLLECTIVE
RUEHJM/AMCONSUL JERUSALEM 0318
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 06 PARIS 001029
SIPDIS
FROM USMISSION TO UNESCO PARIS
SENSITIVE
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: UNESCOSCULPRELPHUMKPALCUIRXFVEKV
SUBJECT: UNESCO SPRING EXECUTIVE BOARD: POLITICAL ISSUES
¶1. (SBU) Summary: UNESCO's April 1-17 Executive Board was a success
for the United States. On the whole, we enjoyed good working
relations with countries in other geographic groups. Regional
voting blocs and economic and other groupings, such as the
Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) and the G-77 initially sought
confrontation on several issues but later showed flexibility. Most
notably, Cuba and Iran fell far short when they tried to submit a
draft initiative on human rights and cultural diversity that was
intended to polarize the organization between the non-aligned and
others.
¶2. (SBU) On major policy issues (internal management-organizational
issues septel), we were able once again to adopt consensually
without debate a resolution on Jerusalem and the Mughrabi Gate
ascent to the Temple Mount. A Venezuelan initiative for a treaty on
the preservation of indigenous languages was deferred for
consideration at a later Executive Board, largely because Venezuela
had failed to follow through on its undertaking to provide
extra-budgetary funding for a preliminary experts' study of what
would be needed. (N.B. The Board did not accept any proposals for
new normative instruments.) Finally, the Board endorsed a refined
(and significantly pared down) plan of action for the commemoration
of the 60th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
that included a U.S. suggestion that the Universal Declaration of
Human Rights be translated into an additional 120 indigenous
languages, if possible. The decision "invites the Director-General
to seek extra-budgetary resources" to ensure implementation of the a
number of elements in the refined plan.
¶3. (SBU) We did not, of course, get everything we wanted or entirely
avoid controversy. We would have preferred, for example, that the
Mughrabi Gate issue not be treated as a separate agenda item, as the
issue is a technical matter more appropriately addressed by the
World Heritage Committee and, within the Executive Board as one of a
cluster of progress reports routinely made by the Director General
on pending matters. A last minute maneuver by Egypt (against the
highly unusual combined opposition of Israel, Jordan, and the
Palestinians) resulted in the adoption of a decision that retained
the Mughrabi Gate issue on the Executive Board's future as an
element of the "Jerusalem" issue.
¶4. (SBU) On a more concerning note, a U.S. decision to invoke its
right to request permission to observe private sessions of the
Committee on Conventions and Recommendations (CR) as it reviews
human rights complaints, even though we are not a member of the CR,
met with heated opposition from Cuba and South Africa and statements
of concern from France and Luxembourg. The rarity of requests like
ours by sitting Executive Board Member States, combined with the
fact that both the rules and past precedent allowed for such
observer participation, caught opponents by surprise and led some
to argue that the presence of the U.S. or other observers would
somehow chill the committee's debates. An obviously, uncomfortable
German committee chair after consulting UNESCO's Legal Adviser and
the Bureau ruled in our favor taking the view that the rules of
procedure cannot be changed during an Executive Board session. We
need to be alert, however, for a move to change those rules at a
succeeding Board session. Finally, Serbian Foreign Minister Jeremic
strongly denounced the alleged destruction of Serbian cultural
monuments in Kosovo and served notice that Serbia will look to
UNESCO to help protect cultural sites in the face of "the danger
posed by the unilateral, illegal, and illegitimate declaration of
independence by the Kosovo Albanians on February 17." End Summary.
¶5. (U) The 58 members of UNESCO's Executive Board (EB) met in Paris
April 1-17 for the Board's 179th session. This was the first
substantive Board meeting since last October's General Conference
and a key opportunity to set the tone for the biennium now
beginning. This message examines the key political issues at the
Board. A separate message will report on the Board's consideration
of issues relating to UNESCO's internal organization and management.
CUBAN DRAFT DECISION ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND CULTURAL DIVERSITY
¶6. (SBU) Cuba began a four-year term on the Board with a strong
effort to revive UNESCO's dormant non-aligned caucus (NAM) of which
it is the chair and polarize the membership along north-south lines.
In doing so, it worked hand-in-glove with Iran (not currently a
Board member). UNESCO almost always operates on consensus with most
measures adopted by consensus. Friendly diplomats on developing
country delegations, however, warned us just before the Board that
in meetings of the NAM Cuba was talking openly of forcing votes and
was trying to win support from NAM members to launch several
initiatives that the north would be certain to oppose. Among these
was a suggestion from Iran that the NAM submit a resolution on the
"right to scientific knowledge." Thanks, we are told, to the strong
opposition of India, Cuba and Iran failed to win the backing of the
NAM for such a measure .
PARIS 00001029 002 OF 006
¶7. (SBU) Cuba and Iran did, however, win agreement to the submission
of a draft decision that requested UNESCO take note of the
Declaration on "Human Rights and Cultural Diversity" that was
adopted by the September 2007 NAM Ministerial in Tehran. As
submitted initially, the draft recommended that UNESCO use the
Tehran declaration during its celebration the 60th anniversary of
the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. It would also have
required UNESCO to cooperate with the NAM Center for Human Rights
and Cultural Diversity in Tehran, as well as insert an item on
"Human Rights and Cultural Diversity" on the agenda of the Spring
2009 Executive Board session.
¶8. (SBU) The Cubans' draft resolution aroused strong opposition
among Western countries (Group I). In several heated Group I
meetings, many states expressed resentment at the apparent link
being made between the 2005 Convention on the Diversity of Cultural
Expressions and the body of generally accepted human rights, as well
as the implied limitation on full respect for all human rights when
such rights are inconsistent with dominant cultural mores. France
and Belgium were adamant about their readiness to call for a vote on
the Cuban draft, if necessary. Italy recalled in that advocates of
the 2005 convention had explicitly assured the U.S. that the
convention had nothing to do with human rights. Greece strongly
condemned a blatant effort at "forum shopping." The Greek
ambassador pointed out that the United Nations General Assembly
(UNGA) had spent three weeks debating a resolution referring to the
Tehran NAM Declaration and had in the end only agreed to take note
of that document. Cuba and Iran should get less in Paris than they
got in New York, he insisted.
¶9. (SBU) In the end, the Norwegian EB Vice Chair Einar Steensnaes
(representing Group I) held a series of tense negotiating sessions
with NAM representatives that continued until the afternoon of the
Board's very last day. In these discussions, European Union members
were keen to have the NAM agree to language that reiterated that
universality of human rights and removed direct reference to the
Tehran Declaration. (The French told us that they suspected the
Iranians' ultimate goal was to create cultural exceptions to
otherwise universal human rights standards.) Numerous formulations
were tried, as was a general reference to the 1993 Vienna Plan of
Action. When NAM representatives would not accept such a reference,
France with support from Italy, Belgium, and other Europeans
announced it was instructed to seek a vote. At this, however, the
NAM recoiled. Even though the Cubans' original intention had
probably been to force such an outcome, the other NAM members
clearly did not want to break UNESCO's tradition of consensus and
leave the organization divided and politicized. In the end, the NAM
agreed to a resolution that referred only to the General Assembly
resolution (62/155) -- not the underlying Tehran Declaration -- and
quotes language from the Vienna Plan of Action that reaffirms that
all human rights are universal, while tasking the UNESCO
Director-General to "report on UNESCO's activities on human rights
and cultural diversity, through the Executive Board, in order to
contribute to the Secretary-General's report on this subject" at the
64th General Assembly session.
Jerusalem and Mughrabi Gate Issues
¶10. (SBU) Jerusalem and the Mughrabi Ascent to the Temple Mount
bulked large at this session as they have at recent Board meetings.
While UNESCO was once again able to avoid divisive debate and adopt
resolutions on these topics by consensus, there was extensive and
sometimes heated discussion in the corridors outside the meeting.
¶11. (SBU) The essential issue was whether the Mughrabi Ascent should
be treated as a stand-alone agenda item, and if not, whether it
should be subsumed within the resolution on Jerusalem that is taken
up at each session as a separate item. In recent Executive Boards,
for reasons that were unique to those sessions, there has been one
resolution on maintaining the character of Jerusalem and another
regarding the Mughrabi Ascent to the Temple Mount. At this Board
session, it no longer made sense to keep the Mughrabi Ascent as a
separate agenda item as the issue was referred to the World Heritage
Committee last year. In taking this position, the U.S. was joined
by Israel, Jordan, and the Palestinian observer delegation.
¶12. (SBU) Egypt, nonetheless, was determined to keep the Mughrabi
Ascent as a separate item on the Executive Board's agenda and
skillfully manipulated Executive Board Chairman Ya'i (Benin) to
facilitate this outcome. The U.S. was forced to intervene in the
first minutes of the opening Plenary to object to the inclusion on
the formal agenda of an item on this subject. We argued the item
could be dealt with in the Director-General's progress report to the
Board on actions taken to implement past Executive Board decisions;
any additional actions should be agreed at the World Heritage
Committee.
PARIS 00001029 003 OF 006
¶13. (SBU) Deputy Director-General Barbosa attempted to defuse the
problem by folding the Mughrabi Ascent issue into a second "section"
of the draft decision that dealt with the character of Jerusalem.
Egypt eventually accepted inclusion of language on the Mughrabi
issue in the larger draft Jerusalem decision, but worked behind the
scenes with Chairman Ya'i and the Secretariat to have a separate
topic on Mughrabi Gate included in the agenda at the last moment,
although the draft decision presented on this topic was purely
pro-forma. The important language on the Mughrabi ascent issue wound
up in the Jerusalem resolution. Notably, as finally adopted, the
latter decision invites the Director-General to make a progress on
the issue. This decision is ambiguous as to when and in what form
the progress report is to be made.
¶14. (SBU) The U.S. made a statement for the record after the
decision was adopted, indicating that it would make formal
objections in the future should the Mughrabi Ascent be again put on
the agenda as a separate item. Only Egypt and Algeria spoke
afterwards, reaffirming their view that the Mughrabi Ascent is of
sufficient importance to require its review as a separate issue.
INDIGENOUS LANGUAGES
¶15. (SBU) Before the Board's opening, it had been widely assumed
that the language issue would dominate these proceedings. This is
the UN's Year of Languages, and Venezuela had convinced the Spring
2007 Board to adopt a decision, requesting the Director-General to
"conduct a preliminary study of the technical and legal aspects of a
possible international standard-setting instrument for the
protection of indigenous and endangered languages . . . . and to
submit such a preliminary study to the Executive Board" at its
Spring 2008 session. EB Chairman Ya'i did little to conceal his
support for the idea of a new standard-setting instrument, believing
fervently as he does, that African children must receive some of
their education in their native languages.
¶16. (SBU) In any event, the push for a new treaty on languages
stalled. While the Latin American states did not wish to publicly
disagree with Venezuela, current chair of the Latin American group,
we understand many expressed reservations when the Latin group met
behind closed doors. Most important, there was no preliminary study
for the Board to discuss because, after winning agreement to conduct
such a study, Venezuela failed to provide the extra-budgetary funds
needed to carry it out.
COMMEMORATION OF THE 60TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE UDHR
¶17. (SBU) Prior to this Executive Board meeting, the U.S.
Delegation anticipated that consideration of UNESCO's proposed plan
for commemorating the 60th anniversary of the Universal Declaration
of Human Rights would lead to heated controversy as happened when
the plan was first presented to the General Conference last October.
At that time, the Secretariat's ambitious plans for a series of
regional conferences and two large international meetings, all
intended to focus on emerging rights, provoked vigorous debate
following which the General Conference refused to "endorse" the
original plan and called for a "refined plan" for approval at this
Executive Board session.
¶18. (SBU) Debate on this issue turned out to be calmer at this Board
session than at the General Conference last October. In the end,
two decisions on this topic were adopted with little fanfare. One
was a scaled back version of the original plan but with deeper
Member State ownership and input, for most of which the
Director-General will seek extra-budgetary funding. (N.B. The list
included a U.S. suggestion that the Universal Declaration be
translated into as many as 120 additional indigenous languages. A
symbolic U.S. contribution toward the costs of such translation will
be needed to re-affirm U.S. credibility on this issue.) A second
decision submitted by Colombia with significant support from other
Latin American states requested the Director-General to provide
intellectual support for a regional human rights conference in
Colombia and asked him to mobilize the intellectual and human
resources needed to organize this event, "it being understood that
conference's logistical expenses will be covered by the host
country."
OTHER ISSUES
¶19. (SBU) EDUCATION: Few other issues provoked the drama or
controversy of the ones already mentioned. There were, however,
several significant education issues on the agenda. The Board, for
example, adopted without debate a decision on Educational and
Cultural Institutions in the occupied Arab Territories. Adopted
also was a progress report on the application of the Global Action
Plan to achieve the Education for All (EFA) goals by 2015. On that
item, this Delegation was successful in ensuring that the language
in the draft decision clarified that there were other financial
PARIS 00001029 004 OF 006
mechanisms in addition to the Fast Track Initiative (FTI) that were
funding EFA. WE also expanded the meaning of the term "multi-lateral
assistance" to include "promoting national leadership, capacity
development, communication and advocacy, resource mobilization and
effective use of aid through existing mechanisms" so that it was not
limited to financial assistance. Finally, there was broad support
for a German draft decision requesting a UNESCO strategy on
Technical and Vocational Education and Training. Over half of the
delegations, including the United States, agreed to cosponsor this
proposal.
¶20. (U) A Latin-proposed measure on PRELAC (Regional Education
Project for Latin America and the Caribbean) was postponed until the
autumn 2008 Executive Board at the request of the Latin American
countries, because the UNESCO-prepared document blatantly failed to
reflect the decisions taken by the Latin American Ministers of
Education at the second Intergovernmental Committee meeting of
PRELAC in March, 2007.
¶21. (SBU) The most controversial education item was a decision on
the Joint Experts Seventh Meeting on the Right to Education. The
United States had concerns that both the summary and the draft
decision referred to "normative bases" and could imply that UNESCO
and the Joint Experts group were seeking new normative instruments
in this area. The United States, working through the Portuguese
Delegation, was successful in ensuring that the draft resolution
expressly referred to "existing" normative bases so it is clear that
no new normative instruments would be created or implied regarding
this topic.
¶22. (U) SCIENCE: Natural Science issues generated little debate at
this Board. Discussion of UNESCO's Draft Climate Change Strategy
generated nothing like the controversy it did when first discussed
last October. It was not adopted, however. About 25 members of the
Executive Board spoke, most favorably. St. Kitts and Nevis
encouraged greater emphasis on Small Island Developing States
(SIDS), and added language to increase emphasis on SIDS and other
less developed countries. The US requested a reduction in the
emphasis on renewable energy based on a desire to focus resources in
areas of demonstrated UNESCO competence. Luxembourg supported this
position. Norway encouraged greater focus and asked for a revised
plan with specifics on value added, significant contributions, and
measurable results. A revised plan will be submitted at the 181st
Executive Board meeting. The US also requested that the key
concerns of Member States, expressed at the meeting, be addressed.
¶23. (U) Member States also supported an Ethiopian proposal to make
2011 the International Year of Chemistry.
¶24. (U) Also considered were several so-called category 2 centers,
centers that are paid for by the host countries but are supposed to
assist UNESCO in its work. Two proposed centers, one in China and
the other in the Korean Republic aroused little opposition, although
several members questioned whether two centers dedicated to the
preservation of intangible cultural heritage of the Asia-Pacific
region were needed in such close proximity to each other. The
Secretariat was asked to prepare a feasibility study on these and to
report on its findings at the autumn 2008 session of the Board.
¶25. (SBU) A Chinese proposal to establish a Category 2 Center
managed by the Chinese Academy of Sciences to monitor cultural and
natural sites, including World Heritage Sites and World Biosphere
Reserves, using satellite remote sensing techniques aroused an
extended debate. Approximately 20 countries endorsed the proposal
with only minor criticisms. Most speakers noted the important
capacity-building aspects and hoped to cooperate with the Center.
The Japanese, however, remarked that no current activities existed
between their space agency (JAXA) and the CAS, although China had
claimed some cooperation with Japan in the proposal. The US spoke
positively about the Center but attempted to add language that would
require for all such Centers, starting with Category II Centers
approved at this Board session, a standing requirement to obtain an
external review before the Center could be renewed by UNESCO. China
agreed, in principle, that reviews of centers should be encouraged
but wanted the matter deferred and considered in a larger context.
Brazil stated that there was a provision for review in the model
agreement for centers in Annex II, Article 16 of the 33C/Resolution
¶90. This article permits review by the Director-General with a
presentation of the results at the Executive Board. Language to
request a review by the Director-General of the Center prior to
renewal under Article 16 was accepted.
DIFFICULT POINTS AND WARNING FLAGS
¶26. (SBU) CR: Not everything went our way. Disagreements emerged
that signal serious problems at future Executive Boards. In
addition to the second agenda item on the Mughrabi Gate (see above),
the U.S. request to observe the private deliberations of the
PARIS 00001029 005 OF 006
Committee on Conventions and Recommendations (CR) touched off
fireworks that may have reverberations at the Board session next
autumn. Despite the CR Chairman's approval (Germany), several
countries, including Cuba and South Africa, registered strong and
continuing protests against the U.S. presence in the room, while
France and Luxembourg indicated discomfort with such a practice,
invoking vaguely articulated reasons. The central argument invoked
against having an observer present was that an observer could
compromise the confidentiality of the (human rights) "cases" being
discussed. The U.S., however, was clear that, while countries whose
cases are being reviewed by the Committee should never be present
during the CR's debate over what conclusions should be drawn and how
to report to the Executive Board, all Executive Board members can be
entrusted to respect the confidentiality of CR proceedings and hence
"private" meetings should never exclude sitting Executive Board
members. (Note: All member states may sit in as observers at all
Executive Board sessions and at meetings of its subsidiary bodies
and committees.) Moreover, there has not to date been any known
instance of an observer State violating the confidentiality of any
CR proceeding.
¶27. (SBU) The issue was discussed with UNESCO's Legal Adviser and in
the Bureau. It was acknowledged that the rules do not prohibit such
observer status and it was determined that the existing rules of
procedure could not be revised during the current Executive Board
session. We believe that the rules are clear that all UNESCO
meetings, whether called "private" or "open" may be observed by, at
the very least, all sitting Executive Board Members. "Private"
should be interpreted as meaning that such meetings may not be
viewed by the general public or other UN agencies. We can expect,
however, that the question of which countries may observe various
meetings will come up again at a future Board meeting, and we could
well face a move to change the rules to make observer presence at
private sessions impossible. We should begin to muster compelling
legal arguments that can be deployed when that debate arises.
¶28. (U) Serbia/Kosovo: Serbian Foreign Minister Vuk Jeremic used
his remarks during the general debate at the opening of the
Executive Board to deliver a stern warning that Serbia may seek in
future to raise at UNESCO the issue of preservation of Serbian
cultural monuments in Kosovo. In a highly emotional statement that
won scattered applause from other delegations he declared that "the
greatest challenge to human rights in Serbia lies in our southern
province of Kosovo under United Nations administration since June
1999 . . . . More than 150 churches or monasteries . . . have been
set ablaze by Kosovo Albanian extremists in the past eight years . .
. . Hundreds of other holy sites remain at risk . . . The purposeful
attempt to vandalize, loot, burn, desecrate, and destroy what others
have built long ago . . . (to) invent an historical narrative of
one's own must be condemned in the strongest possible terms, and
identified clearly for what they are: revolting acts of cultural
cleansing."
COMMENT:
¶29. (SBU) By the standards of past UNESCO meetings, the spring
Executive Board was a model of how well UNESCO can function, in
spite of itself. While regional blocs maintained their outward
solidarity, they were not as rigid or as determined to thwart the
U.S. as in meetings past. Behind the scenes, for example, other
Latin countries clearly exercised a restraining influence on Cuba
(and Venezuela, not on the Board but currently Latin American Group
chairman).
¶30. (SBU) Notably, the Board did not adopt any new initiatives
intended to lead to new normative instruments, with one possible
exception. A superficially-prepared initiative by the Secretariat
to have the Board adopt a formal recommendation on the preservation
of historic urban areas ran into significant opposition from many
delegations. The experts committee that recommended this measure
was composed largely of German and Austrian experts and had little
geographic balance. As a result, its conclusions received a cold
reception from delegations from other regions. Member states by and
large felt the matter was not ripe for consideration by the Board.
In the end, they welcomed the fact that the issue will be considered
by the World Heritage Committee at its upcoming meeting in Quebec in
July 2008, and invited the Director-General to "submit at its 181st
(spring 2009) session a full preliminary study of the technical and
legal aspects of this issue.
¶31. (SBU) It is not clear how long this period of relative harmony
will last. It may well be short. A slight shift in attitudes would
be all that is needed to leave the U.S. in serious difficulties.
The fact that the U.S. is no longer on the Bureau (the committee of
highly influential members who organize Board meetings) means that
our ability to prevent mischievous items from receiving serious
consideration is much reduced. We must also contend with the
personality of Executive Board Chairman Ya'i who famously remarked
PARIS 00001029 006 OF 006
at a meeting a year ago that he might be a chairman but could not be
neutral. We have seen some indications of a similar attitude on his
part in recent months. He has, for example, openly used the power
of the chair to promote a new normative instrument on indigenous
languages. We will need to stay very much alert for tricky
maneuvers by him that may be contrary to our interests.
¶32. (SBU) Finally, we will need to be wary of the fact that many of
our colleagues do not measure success or progress as we do. The
relative harmony that prevailed at this meeting is not to everyone's
taste, including many relatively moderate member states. In talking
with our colleagues from other delegations about the most recent
Executive Board, we often hear the complaint that it was boring.
Many of our colleagues regretted that there were no major
controversies to attract international attention, and there was no
agreement to begin negotiation of new international treaties.
Regrettably, many other delegations seem to measure UNESCO's
achievements largely in terms of treaties agreed. Given these
attitudes, we should expect more turbulence in these waters in the
period ahead.
OLIVER