

Currently released so far... 51122 / 251,287
Articles
Brazil
Sri Lanka
United Kingdom
Sweden
00. Editorial
United States
Latin America
Egypt
Jordan
Yemen
Thailand
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
2011/05/18
2011/05/19
2011/05/20
2011/05/21
2011/05/22
2011/05/23
2011/05/24
2011/05/25
2011/05/26
2011/05/27
2011/05/28
2011/05/29
2011/05/30
2011/05/31
2011/06/01
2011/06/02
2011/06/03
2011/06/04
2011/06/05
2011/06/06
2011/06/07
2011/06/08
2011/06/09
2011/06/10
2011/06/11
2011/06/12
2011/06/13
2011/06/14
2011/06/15
2011/06/16
2011/06/17
2011/06/18
2011/06/19
2011/06/20
2011/06/21
2011/06/22
2011/06/23
2011/06/24
2011/06/25
2011/06/26
2011/06/27
2011/06/28
2011/06/29
2011/06/30
2011/07/01
2011/07/02
2011/07/04
2011/07/05
2011/07/06
2011/07/07
2011/07/08
2011/07/10
2011/07/11
2011/07/12
2011/07/13
2011/07/14
2011/07/15
2011/07/16
2011/07/17
2011/07/18
2011/07/19
2011/07/20
2011/07/21
2011/07/22
2011/07/23
2011/07/25
2011/07/27
2011/07/28
2011/07/29
2011/07/31
2011/08/01
2011/08/02
2011/08/03
2011/08/05
2011/08/06
2011/08/07
2011/08/08
2011/08/09
2011/08/10
2011/08/11
2011/08/12
2011/08/13
2011/08/15
2011/08/16
2011/08/17
2011/08/18
2011/08/19
2011/08/21
2011/08/22
2011/08/23
2011/08/24
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Antananarivo
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Alexandria
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embasy Bonn
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Brazzaville
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangui
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Belfast
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Cotonou
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chiang Mai
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Chengdu
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
DIR FSINFATC
Consulate Dusseldorf
Consulate Durban
Consulate Dubai
Consulate Dhahran
Embassy Guatemala
Embassy Grenada
Embassy Georgetown
Embassy Gaborone
Consulate Guayaquil
Consulate Guangzhou
Consulate Guadalajara
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Hong Kong
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kolonia
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Krakow
Consulate Kolkata
Consulate Karachi
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Lusaka
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Lome
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy Libreville
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Leipzig
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Mission Geneva
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Mogadishu
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maseru
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Merida
Consulate Melbourne
Consulate Matamoros
Consulate Marseille
Embassy Nouakchott
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Nuevo Laredo
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Consulate Nagoya
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Praia
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Moresby
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Podgorica
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Hillah
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Surabaya
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy Tirana
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
Consulate Thessaloniki
USUN New York
USMISSION USTR GENEVA
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Mission CD Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
UN Rome
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vientiane
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AMGT
ASEC
AEMR
AR
APECO
AU
AORC
ADANA
AJ
AF
AFIN
AMED
AS
AM
ABLD
AFFAIRS
AMB
APER
ACOA
AND
AA
AE
AADP
AID
AO
AL
AG
AORD
ADM
AINF
AINT
ASEAN
AORG
ABT
APEC
AY
ASUP
ARF
AGOA
AVIAN
ATRN
ANET
AGIT
ASECVE
ABUD
AODE
ALOW
ADB
AN
ADPM
ASPA
ARABL
AFSN
AZ
AC
AIAG
AFSI
ASCE
ASIG
ACABQ
ADIP
AFGHANISTAN
AROC
ADCO
ACOTA
ANARCHISTS
AMEDCASCKFLO
AK
ARABBL
ASCH
ANTITERRORISM
AGRICULTURE
AOCR
ARR
ASSEMBLY
AORCYM
AFPK
ACKM
AGMT
AEC
APRC
AIN
AFPREL
ASFC
ASECTH
AFSA
AINR
AOPC
AFAF
AFARI
AX
ASECAF
ASECAFIN
AT
AFZAL
APCS
AGAO
AIT
ARCH
AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL
AMEX
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AORCD
AVIATION
ARAS
AINFCY
ACBAQ
AOPR
AREP
AOIC
ASEX
ASEK
AER
AGR
AMCT
AVERY
APR
AEMRS
AFU
AMG
ATPDEA
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AORL
ACS
AMCHAMS
AECL
AUC
ACAO
BA
BR
BB
BG
BEXP
BY
BRUSSELS
BU
BD
BTIO
BK
BL
BE
BMGT
BO
BM
BX
BN
BWC
BBSR
BTT
BC
BH
BILAT
BUSH
BHUM
BT
BTC
BMENA
BOND
BAIO
BP
BF
BRPA
BURNS
BUT
BBG
BCW
BOEHNER
BOL
BASHAR
BIDEN
BFIN
BZ
BEXPC
BTIU
CPAS
CA
CASC
CS
CBW
CIDA
CO
CODEL
CI
CROS
CU
CH
CWC
CMGT
CVIS
CDG
CTR
CG
CF
CHIEF
CJAN
CBSA
CE
CY
CB
CW
CM
CHR
CD
COE
CV
COUNTER
CT
CN
CPUOS
CTERR
CVR
CVPR
CDC
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CONS
COM
CACS
CR
CONTROLS
CAN
CACM
COMMERCE
CAMBODIA
CFIS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITES
CONDOLEEZZA
CZ
CTBT
CEN
CLINTON
CFED
CARC
CTM
CARICOM
CSW
CICTE
CYPRUS
CBE
CMGMT
CARSON
CWCM
CIVS
COUNTRYCLEARANCE
CENTCOM
CAPC
COPUOS
CKGR
CITEL
CQ
CITT
CIC
CARIB
CVIC
CAFTA
CVISU
CDB
CEDAW
CNC
CJUS
COMMAND
CENTER
COL
CAJC
CONSULAR
CLMT
CBC
CIA
CNARC
CIS
CEUDA
CHINA
CAC
CL
DR
DJ
DEMOCRATIC
DEMARCHE
DOMESTIC
DISENGAGEMENT
DB
DA
DHS
DAO
DCM
DAVID
DO
DEAX
DEFENSE
DEA
DTRO
DPRK
DOC
DTRA
DK
DAC
DOD
DRL
DRC
DCG
DE
DOT
DEPT
DOE
DS
DKEM
ECON
ETTC
EFIS
ETRD
EC
EMIN
EAGR
EAID
EFIN
EUN
ECIN
EG
EWWT
EINV
ENRG
ELAB
EPET
EIND
EN
EAIR
EUMEM
ECPS
ES
EI
ELTN
ET
EZ
EU
ER
EINT
ENGR
ECONOMIC
ENIV
EFTA
ETRN
EMS
EUREM
EPA
ESTH
EEB
EET
ENV
EAG
EXIM
ECTRD
ELNT
ENVIRONMENT
ECA
EAP
EINDIR
ETR
ECONOMY
ETRC
ELECTIONS
EICN
EXPORT
EARG
EGHG
EID
ETRO
EINF
EAIDHO
ECIP
EENV
EURM
EPEC
ERNG
ENERG
EIAD
EXBS
ED
EREL
ELAM
EK
EWT
ENGRD
EDEV
ECE
ENGY
EXIMOPIC
ETRDEC
ECCT
EUR
ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID
EFI
ECOSOC
EXTERNAL
ESCAP
ETCC
EENG
ERA
ENRD
ECLAC
ETRAD
EBRD
ENVR
ECONENRG
ELTNSNAR
ELAP
EPIT
EDUC
EAIDXMXAXBXFFR
EETC
EIVN
EDRC
EGOV
ETRA
EAIDRW
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ESA
ETRDGK
ENVI
ELN
EPRT
EPTED
ERTD
EUM
EAIDS
EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM
EDU
EV
EAIDAF
EDA
EPREL
EINVEFIN
EAGER
ETMIN
EUCOM
ECCP
EIDN
EINVKSCA
ENNP
EFINECONCS
ETC
EAIRASECCASCID
EINN
ETRP
ECONOMICS
ENERGY
EIAR
EINDETRD
ECONEFIN
EURN
ETRDEINVTINTCS
EFIM
ETIO
EATO
EIPR
EINVETC
ETTD
ETDR
EIQ
ECONCS
ENRGIZ
EAIG
ENTG
EUC
ERD
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECUN
FR
FI
FOREIGN
FARM
FIR
FAO
FK
FARC
FAS
FJ
FREEDOM
FAC
FINANCE
FBI
FTAA
FM
FCS
FAA
FORCE
FDA
FTA
FT
FCSC
FMGT
FINR
FIN
FDIC
FOR
FOI
FO
FMLN
FISO
GM
GERARD
GT
GA
GG
GR
GTIP
GH
GZ
GE
GB
GY
GAZA
GJ
GEORGE
GOI
GCC
GMUS
GI
GLOBAL
GV
GC
GL
GOV
GKGIC
GF
GWI
GIPNC
GUTIERREZ
GTMO
GANGS
GAERC
GUILLERMO
GASPAR
HR
HA
HYMPSK
HO
HK
HUMAN
HU
HN
HHS
HURI
HUD
HUMRIT
HUMANITARIAN
HUMANR
HL
HSTC
HILLARY
HCOPIL
HADLEY
HOURANI
HI
HUM
HEBRON
HUMOR
IZ
IN
IAEA
IS
IMO
ILO
IR
IC
IT
ITU
ID
IV
IMF
IBRD
IWC
ICAO
ICRC
INF
IO
IPR
ISO
IK
ISRAELI
IQ
ICES
IDB
INFLUENZA
IRAQI
ISCON
IGAD
IRAN
ITALY
IRAQ
ICTY
ICTR
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IQNV
IADB
INTERNAL
INMARSAT
IRDB
ILC
INCB
INRB
ICJ
ISRAEL
INR
IEA
ISPA
ICCAT
IOM
ITRD
IHO
IL
IFAD
ITRA
IDLI
ISCA
INL
INRA
INTELSAT
ISAF
ISPL
IRS
IEF
ITER
INDO
IIP
IND
IEFIN
IACI
IAHRC
INNP
IA
INTERPOL
IFIN
ISSUES
IZPREL
IRAJ
IF
ITPHUM
ITA
IP
IRPE
IDA
ISLAMISTS
ITF
INRO
IBET
IDP
IRC
KMDR
KPAO
KOMC
KNNP
KFLO
KDEM
KSUM
KIPR
KFLU
KE
KCRM
KJUS
KAWC
KZ
KSCA
KDRG
KCOR
KGHG
KPAL
KTIP
KMCA
KCRS
KPKO
KOLY
KRVC
KVPR
KG
KWBG
KTER
KS
KN
KSPR
KWMN
KV
KTFN
KFRD
KU
KSTC
KSTH
KISL
KGIC
KSEP
KFIN
KTEX
KTIA
KUNR
KCMR
KCIP
KMOC
KTDB
KBIO
KBCT
KMPI
KSAF
KACT
KFEM
KPRV
KPWR
KIRC
KCFE
KRIM
KHIV
KHLS
KVIR
KNNNP
KCEM
KLIG
KIRF
KNUP
KSAC
KNUC
KPGOV
KTDD
KIDE
KOMS
KLFU
KNNC
KMFO
KSEO
KJRE
KJUST
KMRS
KSRE
KGIT
KPIR
KPOA
KUWAIT
KIVP
KICC
KSCS
KPOL
KSEAO
KRCM
KSCI
KNAP
KGLB
KICA
KCUL
KPRM
KFSC
KQ
KPOP
KPFO
KPALAOIS
KREC
KBWG
KR
KTTB
KNAR
KCOM
KESS
KINR
KOCI
KWN
KCSY
KREL
KTBT
KFTN
KW
KRFD
KFLOA
KHDP
KNEP
KIND
KHUM
KSKN
KOMO
KDRL
KTFIN
KSOC
KPO
KGIV
KSTCPL
KSI
KPRP
KFPC
KNNB
KNDP
KICCPUR
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KDMR
KFCE
KIMMITT
KMCC
KMNP
KSEC
KOMCSG
KGCC
KRAD
KCRP
KAUST
KWAWC
KCHG
KRDP
KPAS
KTIAPARM
KPAOPREL
KWGB
KIRP
KMIG
KLAB
KSEI
KHSA
KNPP
KPAONZ
KWWW
KGHA
KY
KCRIM
KCRCM
KGCN
KPLS
KIIP
KPAOY
KTRD
KTAO
KJU
KBTS
KWAC
KFIU
KNNO
KPAI
KILS
KPA
KRCS
KWBGSY
KNPPIS
KNNPMNUC
KNPT
KERG
KLTN
KPREL
KTLA
KO
KAWK
KVRP
KAID
KX
KENV
KWCI
KNPR
KCFC
KNEI
KFTFN
KTFM
KCERS
KDEMAF
KMEPI
KEMS
KBTR
KEDU
KIRL
KNNR
KMPT
KPDD
KPIN
KDEV
KFRP
KTBD
KMSG
KWWMN
KWBC
KA
KOM
KWNM
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KRGY
KNNF
KICR
KIFR
KWMNCS
KPAK
KDDG
KCGC
KID
KNSD
KMPF
KWMM
MARR
MX
MASS
MOPS
MNUC
MCAP
MTCRE
MRCRE
MTRE
MASC
MY
MK
MG
MU
MILI
MO
MZ
MEPP
MCC
MEDIA
MOPPS
MI
MAS
MW
MP
MEPN
MV
MD
MR
MC
MCA
MT
MIL
MARITIME
MOPSGRPARM
MAAR
MOOPS
ML
MA
MN
MNUCPTEREZ
MTCR
MUNC
MPOS
MONUC
MGMT
MURRAY
MACP
MINUSTAH
MCCONNELL
MGT
MNUR
MF
MEPI
MOHAMMAD
MAR
MAPP
MNU
MFA
MTS
MLS
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MED
MNVC
MIK
MBM
MILITARY
MAPS
MARAD
MDC
MACEDONIA
MASSMNUC
MUCN
MQADHAFI
MPS
NZ
NATO
NI
NO
NU
NG
NL
NPT
NS
NA
NP
NASA
NSF
NEA
NANCY
NSG
NRR
NATIONAL
NMNUC
NC
NSC
NAS
NARC
NELSON
NATEU
NDP
NIH
NK
NIPP
NR
NERG
NSSP
NE
NTDB
NT
NEGROPONTE
NGO
NATOIRAQ
NAR
NZUS
NCCC
NH
NAFTA
NEW
NRG
NUIN
NOVO
NATOPREL
NV
NICHOLAS
NPA
NSFO
NW
NORAD
NPG
NOAA
OPRC
OPDC
OTRA
OECD
OVIP
OREP
ODC
OIIP
OAS
OSCE
OPIC
OMS
OFDP
OFDA
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OSCI
OM
OPAD
ODPC
OIC
ODIP
OPPI
ORA
OCEA
OREG
OMIG
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXP
OPEC
OFPD
OAU
OCII
OIL
OVIPPRELUNGANU
OSHA
OPCD
OPCR
OF
OFDPQIS
OSIC
OHUM
OTR
OBSP
OGAC
OESC
OVP
ON
OES
OTAR
OCS
PREL
PGOV
PARM
PINR
PHUM
PM
PREF
PTER
PK
PINS
PBIO
PHSA
PE
PBTS
PA
PL
POL
PAK
POV
POLITICS
POLICY
PO
PRELTBIOBA
PKO
PIN
PNAT
PU
PGOVPREL
PALESTINIAN
PTERPGOV
PELOSI
PAS
PP
PTEL
PROP
PRELAF
PRHUM
PRE
PUNE
PIRF
PVOV
PROG
PERSONS
PROV
PKK
PRGOV
PH
PLAB
PDEM
PCI
PRL
PRM
PINSO
PERM
PETR
PPAO
PERL
PBS
PETERS
PRELBR
PCON
POLITICAL
PMIL
POLM
PKPA
PNUM
PLO
PTERM
PJUS
PARMP
PNIR
PHUMKPAL
PG
PREZ
PGIC
PAO
PROTECTION
PRELPK
PGOVENRG
PATTY
PSOC
PARTIES
PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ
PMIG
PAIGH
PARK
PETER
PHUS
PKPO
PGOVECON
POUS
PMAR
PWBG
PAR
PGOVGM
PHUH
PTE
PY
POLUN
PDOV
PGOVSOCI
PGOVPM
PRELEVU
PGOR
PBTSRU
PHUMA
PHUMR
PPD
PGV
PRAM
PARMS
PINL
PSI
PKPAL
PPA
PTERE
PGOF
PINO
PREO
PHAS
PAC
PRESL
PORG
PS
PGVO
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PINT
PRELP
PREFA
PNG
PTBS
PFOR
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PREK
PHJM
POLINT
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PECON
PEACE
PROCESS
PLN
PEDRO
PF
PGPV
PCUL
PGGV
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGIV
PHUMPREL
POGOV
PEL
PBT
PAMQ
PINF
PSEPC
POSTS
PAHO
PHUMPGOV
PGOC
PNR
RS
RP
RU
RW
RFE
RCMP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
REFORM
RO
ROW
ROBERT
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RELATIONS
RAY
ROBERTG
RIGHTS
RM
RATIFICATION
RREL
RBI
RICE
ROOD
REL
RODHAM
RGY
RUEHZO
RELIGIOUS
RELFREE
RUEUN
RELAM
RSP
RF
REO
REGIONAL
RUPREL
RI
REMON
RPEL
RSO
SCUL
SENV
SOCI
SZ
SNAR
SO
SP
SU
SY
SI
SMIG
SYR
SA
SW
SF
SR
SYRIA
SNARM
START
SPECIALIST
SG
SNIG
SCI
SGWI
SE
SIPDIS
SANC
SELAB
SN
SETTLEMENTS
SCIENCE
SENVENV
SENS
SPCE
SPAS
SECURITY
SENC
SOCIETY
SOSI
SENVEAGREAIDTBIOECONSOCIXR
SEN
SPECI
ST
SL
SENVCASCEAIDID
SC
SECRETARY
STR
SNA
SOCIS
SADC
SEP
SK
SHUM
SYAI
SMIL
STEPHEN
SNRV
SKCA
SENSITIVE
SECI
SCUD
SCRM
SGNV
SECTOR
SAARC
SENVSXE
SWMN
STEINBERG
SOPN
SOCR
SCRS
SWE
SARS
SNARIZ
SUDAN
SENVQGR
SAN
SM
SFNV
SSA
SPCVIS
SOFA
SCULKPAOECONTU
SENVKGHG
SHI
SEVN
SH
SNARCS
SNARN
SIPRS
TBIO
TW
TRGY
TSPA
TU
TPHY
TI
TX
TH
TIP
TSPL
TNGD
TZ
TS
TC
TK
TURKEY
TERRORISM
TPSL
TINT
TRSY
TERFIN
TPP
TT
TECHNOLOGY
TE
TAGS
TRAFFICKING
TJ
TN
TO
TD
TP
TREATY
TR
TA
TIO
TECH
TF
TRAD
TNDG
TWI
TPSA
TWL
TAUSCHER
TRBY
TL
TV
THPY
TSPAM
TREL
TRT
TNAR
TFIN
TWCH
THOMMA
THOMAS
TERROR
TRY
TBID
UK
UNESCO
UNSC
UNGA
UN
US
UZ
USEU
UG
UP
UNAUS
UNMIK
USTR
UY
USUN
UNEP
UNDC
UV
UNPUOS
UNSCR
USAID
UNODC
UNRCR
UNHCR
UNDP
UNCRIME
UA
UNHRC
UNRWA
UNO
UNCND
UNCHR
USAU
UNICEF
USPS
UNOMIG
UNESCOSCULPRELPHUMKPALCUIRXFVEKV
UR
UNFICYP
UNCITRAL
UNAMA
UNVIE
USTDA
USNC
UNCSD
USCC
UNEF
UNGAPL
USSC
UNMIC
UNTAC
UNCLASSIFIED
USDA
UNCTAD
USGS
UNFPA
UNSE
USOAS
UE
UAE
UNCHS
UNDESCO
UNC
UNSCS
UKXG
UNGACG
UNHR
UNBRO
UNCHC
UNFCYP
UNIDROIT
WHTI
WIPO
WTRO
WHO
WTO
WMO
WFP
WEET
WS
WE
WA
WHA
WBG
WILLIAM
WI
WSIS
WCL
WEBZ
WZ
WW
WWBG
WMD
WWT
WMN
WWARD
WITH
WTRQ
WCO
WEU
WB
WBEG
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09PARIS906, GNEP - France Hosts Successful Third Reliable
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09PARIS906.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09PARIS906 | 2009-07-02 16:42 | 2011-08-24 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Paris |
VZCZCXYZ0000
RR RUEHWEB
DE RUEHFR #0906/01 1831642
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 021642Z JUL 09
FM AMEMBASSY PARIS
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 6636
INFO RHEBAAA/DEPT OF ENERGY WASHINGTON DC
RUEANFA/NRC WASHDC
RUEHYE/AMEMBASSY YEREVAN 0282
RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA 1832
RUEHSF/AMEMBASSY SOFIA 0601
RUEHOT/AMEMBASSY OTTAWA 2319
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 2024
RUEHTL/AMEMBASSY TALLINN 0001
RUEHAR/AMEMBASSY ACCRA 0808
RUEHUP/AMEMBASSY BUDAPEST 0547
RUEHRO/AMEMBASSY ROME 9167
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO 3026
RUEHAM/AMEMBASSY AMMAN 1368
RUEHTA/AMEMBASSY ASTANA 0098
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL 1753
RUEHVL/AMEMBASSY VILNIUS 0233
RUEHRB/AMEMBASSY RABAT 1189
RUEHMS/AMEMBASSY MUSCAT 0003
RUEHWR/AMEMBASSY WARSAW 1024
RUEHBM/AMEMBASSY BUCHAREST 0567
RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW 6431
RUEHDK/AMEMBASSY DAKAR 1698
RUEHLJ/AMEMBASSY LJUBLJANA 0545
RUEHKV/AMEMBASSY KYIV 0597
RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON 7205
RUEHUNV/USMISSION UNVIE VIENNA 0705
UNCLAS PARIS 000906
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
NOT FOR INTERNET DISTRIBUTION
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: TRGY ENRG KNNP IAEA FR
SUBJECT: GNEP - France Hosts Successful Third Reliable
Nuclear Fuel Services Working Group Meeting In Cherbourg
REF: A) 08 STATE 037716 B) 08 STATE 109919
-------------------
SUMMARY AND COMMENT
-------------------
¶1. (U) The third meeting of the Reliable Nuclear Fuel Services
Working Group (RNFSWG) of the Global Nuclear Energy Partnership
(GNEP) was held in Cherbourg, France on March 20. Twenty
participants from ten countries and two international organizations
attended this meeting, which was dedicated to discussion of
sub-Working Groups identified at the September 2008 RNFSWG meeting
(ref B).
¶2. (SBU) French representatives heavily promoted the use of existing
spent fuel reprocessing techniques based on Plutonium - Uranium
Extraction (PUREX) technology through a tour of the La Hague
reprocessing plant, a discussion about France's spent fuel
management policy, and tabling of a work plan for a sub-Working
Group on "elements and criteria for closing the fuel cycle." The
French encouraged Working Group endorsement for this Areva process.
In response to concerns from the Republic of Korea, Jordan, and the
United States, the Working Group agreed to add explicit language to
the proposed work plan to clarify that it would address both
near-term and long-term options (consistent with the last two
elements of the GNEP Statement of Principles) as well as
international aspects.
¶3. (SBU) In addition to discussions on the spent nuclear fuel back
end of the fuel cycle, Poland presented a briefing on world uranium
reserves and the IAEA presented conclusions on fuel fabrication
diversity and updates on recent proposals for nuclear fuel supply
assurances. There was no interest registered in establishing a
sub-Working Group on fuel assembly diversity, though it was agreed
that the RNFSWG would pursue a workshop on industry views at its
next meeting. There was more interest in a sub-Working Group on
assurances of nuclear fuel supply, and Jordan agreed to chair a
sub-group on this topic. It was agreed that the United States would
retain the Working Group chair through the next RNFSWG meeting,
which Poland offered to host in late September or the first week of
October.
¶4. (SBU) COMMENT: Overall the meeting was a success, though the
conversation was dominated by the United States, France, Jordan,
Korea, and Poland. Very little was heard from Bulgaria, China,
Japan, or Australia. Usual RNFSWG participants Canada, Russia, and
the UK were absent from this meeting, as was Slovenia. END SUMMARY
AND COMMENT
----------
BACKGROUND
----------
¶5. (U) On September 16, 2007, GNEP was formally established at a
ministerial meeting in Vienna, during which two Working Groups on
Infrastructure Development and Reliable Nuclear Fuel Services were
established. The RNFSWG held its inaugural meeting in Wilmington,
NC on March 31-April 1, 2008 (ref A) and its second meeting on
September 3-4, 2008 in Vienna (ref B). GNEP presently consists of 25
Partners: Armenia, Australia, Bulgaria, Canada, China, Estonia,
France, Ghana, Hungary, Italy, Japan, Jordan, Kazakhstan, the
Republic of Korea, Lithuania, Morocco, Oman, Poland, Romania,
Russia, Senegal, Slovenia, Ukraine, the United Kingdom and the
United States. There are three international organizations that
participate as GNEP Observers: the IAEA, Euratom, and the
Generation IV International Forum (GIF).
---------------
MEETING SUMMARY
---------------
¶6. (U) The Reliable Nuclear Fuel Services Working Group (RNFSWG)
held its 3rd meeting in Cherbourg, France, on March 20, 2009. The
meeting was hosted by France and included a tour of the La Hague
reprocessing plant hosted by AREVA. The meeting was chaired by the
United States and attended by 20 representatives from 10 partner
states (Australia, Bulgaria, China, France, Japan, Jordan, Poland,
the Republic of Korea, Romania, and the United States) as well as
two international organizations (the IAEA and the Generation IV
International Forum).
¶7. (U) The U.S. representative opened the meeting by reviewing the
results of the inaugural RNFSWG meeting held March 31-April 1, 2008
in Wilmington, NC, USA (ref A) and the second RNFSWG held September
3-4, 2008 in Vienna, Austria (ref B). He commented that the first
meeting had focused on a systematic review of the stages comprising
the front end of the nuclear fuel cycle (from uranium mining through
fuel assembly) while the second meeting shifted the focus to the
back end of the nuclear fuel cycle. At the close of the second
meeting, five issues were identified as needing further study: fuel
assurances, the back end of the nuclear fuel cycle, fuel
fabrication, fact finding, and collateral issues. The sub-Working
Groups identified to address these issues were the focus of this 3rd
RNFSWG meeting.
REPORT BY THE SUB-WORKING GROUP FOR COMPILING LESSONS
LEARNED AND PERSPECTIVES FOR RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS
¶8. (U) BEGIN POLAND/FRANCE PRESENTATION: The representative from
Poland presented a draft paper entitled "Nuclear Fissile Fuels
Worldwide Resources," co-written by Poland and France. He commented
that the Polish government recently announced its intention to build
one or two nuclear power plants. Elsewhere, many other countries,
including the UK and Italy were also considering the development of
new nuclear power plants. Since it seemed likely that the demand
for uranium would increase by this renewed interest, it was
important to gain an understanding of the world's uranium (and other
fissile fuel) reserves. The Polish representative noted that the
2007 OECD "Red Book" estimated the identified amount of conventional
uranium resources that can be mined for less the USD 130/kg to be
about 5.5 million tons U. Based on the global 2006 uranium
consumption level (66,500 tons of Uranium or "tU"), this would be
sufficient for about 85 years of uranium supply. If undiscovered
conventional uranium resources are included (prognosticated and
speculative), the estimate would rise to about 16 million tU,
sufficient for about 270 years of operation at present consumption
rates.
¶9. (U) The Polish representative concluded that sufficient
conventional uranium resources will be available to allow for an
expansion of nuclear capacities by a factor of 2-3 while maintaining
electricity prices competitive with fossil fuels. The exploitation
of unconventional resources (low grade ore, phosphate rock, copper
leaching solution, phosphoric acid, or sea water) requires
additional research and development but has a potential to increase
uranium production capacities by a factor of 2 or more in the medium
term.
¶10. (U) According to this draft paper, total uranium resources could
be extended relative to the once-through fuel cycle by recycling of
fissile material (by 20%-30%), reactor improvements (5%-10%), and
uranium recovery methods (about 20%) for a total potential gain of
40%-50%. The implementation of fast breeder reactors could increase
the energy potential of today's known uranium resources by up to 70
times, enough for more than 3,000 years at today's level of
consumption (though this figure was met with some skepticism by the
Working Group, which called for further study). Finally, the Polish
representative commented that fertile thorium can also be used as a
nuclear fuel through breeding to uranium-233, though the requisite
technology needs further development.
¶11. (U) The Jordanian representative commented that his country had
looked into the feasibility of extracting uranium from phosphate,
and preliminary results indicate that this process looks viable.
¶12. (U) A French representative noted that the Phenix fast reactor
had just ceased operation in France. France has a plan for a new
prototype fast reactor by the end of 2020. Since there are
sufficient uranium resources available for about 200 years of
operation with light water reactors (LWRs), he added, there is
little pressure to develop industrial-scale fast reactors, though
this should be achievable in principle. The Generation IV
International Forum (GIF) representative reminded the working group
that "sustainability" involved not only available resources, but
also waste management and nonproliferation considerations. END
POLAND/FRANCE PRESENTATION.
¶13. (U) BEGIN FRANCE PRESENTATION: The French Ministry of Energy
representative gave a presentation on the "Legal and Organizational
Framework of the Back End of the Fuel Cycle in France." She
explained that France had decided to operate a closed fuel cycle,
where spent nuclear fuel was reprocessed and civil plutonium
extracted for use in mixed oxide (MOX) fuel, while ultimate waste
(fission products and minor actinides) is isolated and conditioned
for long-term disposal. This results in a savings of raw material
(3,000 tU per year), a reduced spending for enrichment, reduced
interim storage requirements, and reduced volume of spent fuel and
high-level waste to be disposed of. She noted that in Europe, 35
nuclear power plants (NPPs) are capable of burning MOX fuel (20 in
France), while Japan has 15-18 MOX-capable plants.
¶14. (U) The French Ministry of Energy representative described four
pillars upon which France's radioactive materials and waste (RMW)
management is based: (1) a sound legal and regulatory framework,
(2) a solid research policy, (3) transparency and democracy, and (4)
secure financing.
-- The legal/regulatory framework is based on the 1991 Bataille Act
that defined principles for high level waste (HLW) and a 28 June
2006 Act on sustainable RMW management. In addition, a 13 June 2006
Act on nuclear transparency and security established the Nuclear
Safety Authority (ASN) as an independent administrative body.
According to these laws, disposal of radioactive waste originating
from foreign countries is forbidden in France, and may be imported
only for reprocessing, research, or transfer.
-- France's waste management research program is based on three
complementary axes: (1) partitioning and transmutation, calling for
an assessment of viable technologies by 2012 and potential pilot
facilities by 2020, (2) deep geological disposal, calling for site
authorization by 2015 and potential operation by 2025, and (3)
conditioning and storage, calling for creation of new or
modification of existing facilities by 2015.
-- Decisions about RMW management in France are taken with
consultation with the local population (on a continuous basis), the
general population (including national debates), and Parliament
(whose views must be sought prior to any governmental decision).
-- RMW management authorities in France are provided secure and
sufficient funds for research and development purposes and for waste
management activities.
¶15. (U) Radioactive waste management in France is the responsibility
of the National Radioactive Waste Management Agency (ANDRA), which
will operate a disposal facility once operational. A second
relevant body is the National Review Board (CNE), who is responsible
for assessing the progress of studies related to RMW management.
¶16. (U) The working group discussed the disposal benefits of
reprocessing, and France noted that 7 spent LWR fuel assemblies were
used to produce one MOX assembly. As a result, the ultimate amount
of waste to be disposed of is much lower. The United States
representative pointed out since the spent MOX fuel must also be
stored, the full disposal benefits of reprocessing would not be
achieved until industrial fast burner reactors are available. The
GIF representative added that fast reactors would also lower the
radiotoxicity of the ultimate waste.
¶17. (U) The Romanian representative noted that reprocessing of spend
CANDU reactor fuel was discussed during the (March 19) La Hague
tour, during which AREVA noted that this would not be economical.
When asked why, the French side explained that the total amount of
spent CANDU fuel would be insufficient to justify the plant
modifications that would be needed. END FRANCE PRESENTATION.
¶18. (U) The United States representative tabled a paper, entitled
"Foreign Research Reactor Spent Fuel Return Program - U.S.
Department of Energy Experience in Planning, Receipt and
Transportation," which provided a review of this program and
compiled lessons learned from its implementation. In the interest
of time, there was no working group discussion on this paper.
¶19. (U) The Bulgarian representatives tabled a paper entitled
"Preparation of the Activities to Ensure Nuclear Fuel Cycle at Units
5&6, WWER 1000 Type Reactors of Kozloduy NPP." In the interest of
time, there was no working group discussion on this paper.
¶20. (U) The Working Group agreed to post all draft papers on
"Lessons Learned and Perspectives for Resource Requirements" on the
GNEP Portal for continued comment by Working Group members. A
summary of the papers would then be prepared for presentation at the
next GNEP Steering Group meeting in September/October 2009.
REPORT BY THE SUB-WORKING GROUP ON ELEMENTS
AND CRITERIA FOR CLOSING THE FUEL CYCLE
¶21. (U) The French representatives tabled a draft terms of reference
and work plan for a sub-Working Group on "Closing the Nuclear Fuel
Cycle." They commented that the objectives of this sub-group would
be: (1) to identify factors and limitations relevant to the back end
of the fuel cycle, (2) to compile a list of current practices and
frameworks, and (3) to recommend measures for moving towards fuel
services arrangements achieving the management of spent fuel and
closing the fuel cycle.
¶22. (U) Due to the complexities of this issue, the French
representatives recommended proceeding over three stages to meet
these objectives. First, a set of documents would be developed that
identify the principal elements in need of discussion (including
technical, legal, safety, security, policy, proliferation, and
public acceptance considerations). The sub-group chairs would
prepare a first draft by June 2009 with the aim of finalizing a
draft for review at the next RNFSWG meeting in fall 2009. Second, a
compilation of current approaches to back-end management would be
prepared with an aim of finalizing by the spring 2010 RNFSWG
meeting. Finally, a document would be drafted that describes short-
and long-term options for spent fuel management and closing of the
nuclear fuel cycle. The United States representative informed the
Working Group that the UK representative, who was unable to attend
the Cherbourg meeting, had expressed interest in sharing leadership
of this sub-group.
¶23. (U) The Korean representative commented on the need to clarify
what the work plan means by "closing" the fuel cycle and whether
this implied a closed fuel cycle based on existing techniques or
advanced technologies still under development. The latter, he noted,
would require significant research and development. The French
representatives responded that this should be done progressively, in
light of the last two elements of the GNEP Statement of Principles,
which call for steps to "develop, and demonstrate, inter alia,
advanced technologies for recycling spent nuclear fuel" as well as
to "take advantage of the best available fuel cycle approaches."
The United States representative seconded the notion that while
"best available" approaches should be considered, the emphasis
should be placed on advanced technologies designed that would be
necessary for greater waste management and nonproliferation
benefits. The Jordanian representative stressed the importance of
the sub-group focusing also on international mechanisms and
multilateral arrangements.
¶24. (U) The Working Group agreed it was necessary to add language to
the work plan to address all of these concerns. The French
representatives agreed to modify the draft work plan and circulate
the revisions with an aim of reaching consensus by the April 7-8
GNEP Steering Group meeting.
DISCUSSION OF NEW SUB-WORKING GROUP ON MECHANISMS
NEEDED TO INCREASE DIVERSITY OF FABRICATED FUEL
¶25. (U) The discussion on fuel assembly diversity began with a
presentation by the IAEA representative. He summarized a recent
Agency consultants meeting on this issue, the objectives of which
were to identify and analyze possible mechanisms to increase the
assurance of supply of fabricated fuel assemblies. It was stressed
that whereas LEU is a fungible commodity (essentially the same
irrespective of producer), fuel assemblies are products with a high
technological content, protected by intellectual property rights and
proprietary components.
¶26. (U) The IAEA representative noted that the market is quite
competitive and satisfactory, and for most reactor types at least
two suppliers exist. Although it is possible for a reactor to
change from one fuel assembly design to another, doing so requires
extensive analysis and regulatory licensing work. Each new fuel
type normally requires a new license and might require testing of
lead assemblies. In certain cases, it is estimated that changeover
from one fuel type to another can be accomplished in as few as two
years, however the process typically takes about five years.
¶27. (U) According to the conclusions of the consultants meeting, the
following approaches are suggested to reduce the time needed to
switch fuel assembly suppliers: (1) the customer could have two
fuel suppliers qualified to provide fuel, (2) the customer's
government could establish well in advance specific agreements
allowing a switch of supplier, or (3) the customer could make
efforts in advance to obtain regulatory authorization for suppliers
that are not yet certified. More generally, the risk of fuel
assembly disruption could be reduced by establishing a local source
of fabrication or by holding reserves of finished fuel assemblies.
¶28. (U) The Jordanian representative advised states to pursue
multiple contracts for fuel assembly supply to minimize disruption
risk. A French representative noted that there is no single measure
that can be taken to offer 100% assurance, advising instead to take
a combination of measures to reduce the risk of disruption. The
Japanese representative announced that his Mission to the IAEA had
hosted a January 2009 "Seminar on Global Nuclear Fuel Supply" during
which fuel assembly supply was discussed. Papers from this seminar
are available at http://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/
energy/iaea/seminar0902/index.html.
¶29. (U) During the meeting, no Working Group members were prepared
to offer a detailed report of the steps they have taken to offer
assurance of fuel assembly supply. It was therefore decided that
members could submit voluntary reports to the group prior to the
next Working Group meeting. There was no great interest from
Working Group members to take the leadership role on a sub-Working
Group on fuel assembly supply. Instead, it was decided that a
workshop on industry perspectives in this issue should be organized
during the fall 2009 Working Group meeting. Following this
workshop, the Working Group will determine whether there is a need
for a further work in this area.
DISCUSSION OF NEW SUB-WORKING GROUP ON ASSURANCES A
COUNTRY SHOULD SEEK AS SUFFICIENT FOR NUCLEAR SUPPLY
¶30. (U) The discussion on fuel assurances began with a presentation
by the IAEA representative. He identified two "co-equal" problems
that were motivating recent work in this area: the risk of
political interruptions of LEU fuel as a non-market disincentive
discouraging investment in nuclear power, and the resulting
incentive for building new national "proliferation-sensitive"
enrichment facilities. Beginning in 2003, the IAEA has attempted to
address these through the development of multilateral mechanisms
designed to provide reliable access to nuclear fuel. He identified
10 proposed fuel assurance mechanisms from various Member States,
three of which were identified as relatively advanced:
-- a Russian-funded LEU reserve of 120 tons LEU to be stored at
Angarsk, regulated by two agreements (Russia-IAEA and IAEA-Consumer
State) to be approved by the IAEA Board of Governors. This may be
presented to the Board for consideration at the June 2009 meeting;
-- a low enriched uranium "fuel bank," under IAEA auspices, funded
by the Nuclear Threat Initiative, an American nongovernmental
organization and the governments of the United States, the UAE,
Kuwait, Norway, and the European Union. An institutional framework
for this mechanism is under development and will possibly be
presented to the Board of Governors prior to their June 2009
meeting; and
-- a German proposal for a "multilateral enrichment sanctuary
project" whereby a group of interested states would jointly operate
an enrichment facility in an "international territory" administered
by the IAEA.
¶31. (U) The IAEA representative reported that at the March 2009
Board of Governors meeting, Director General ElBaradei stated that
fuel assurance mechanisms should be based on three principles: (1)
non-political, non-discriminatory, and available to all States
meeting safeguards obligations, (2) release of fuel be determined by
non-political criteria established in advance, and (3) no State to
give up any Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT) rights regarding
any parts of the nuclear fuel cycle.
¶32. (U) Following the presentation, the Jordanian representative
commented that the IAEA is by definition a strictly multilateral
organization, so that any mechanisms under its auspices would have
an added level of assurance. The French representative noted that
France supports these projects (commenting that as EU president it
played a big role in the EU fuel bank contribution) and was pleased
to see movement towards discussion within the Board of Governors.
The French representative also noted that the proposals as they
stand do not impact any states' NPT rights. The Japanese
representative noted that this issue was also considered at the
January 2009 seminar Japan hosted in Vienna (see link above).
¶33. (U) During the September 2008 RNFSWG meeting, the possibility
was raised of a sub-Working Group on "assurances a country should
seek as sufficient for nuclear supply." The United State
representative queried the group for interest in leading this
sub-Working Group, and the representative from Jordan stated that
Jordan would be willing to serve as chair. It will therefore
prepare a draft work plan to present to the Working Group at the
fall 2009 meeting.
LEADERSHIP SUCCESSION AND NEXT MEETING
¶34. (U) The United States representative asked the Working Group if
any nations were interested in taking over leadership of the group
upon closure of the present meeting. In the absence of any explicit
interest, it was agreed that the United States would hold the chair
for one more meeting in fall 2009. At this meeting, the Working
Group would select a new chair to lead the group in 2010.
¶35. (U) The Working Group was asked for expressions of interest for
hosting the fall 2009 meeting. The Polish representative voiced
interest. This meeting could possibly be arranged for Gdansk,
Warsaw, or Krakow, but three months advance notice was requested.
¶36. (U) Regarding dates for the next meeting, the U.S.
representative reminded the group that the IAEA Board of Governors
meeting was to take place the week of September 7 and the General
Conference would be held the week of September 14, 2009. To allow
sufficient time to finalize meeting results for presentation at the
next (late October) GNEP Steering Group meeting in China, the weeks
of September 28 or October 5 were proposed. As chair of the Working
Group, the United States will follow-up with a firm proposal for the
fall 2009 meeting.
VISIT OF AREVA'S LA HAGUE RECYLCING FACILITY
¶37. (U) On March 19, the Working Group was invited by AREVA to tour
its recycling facility at La Hague. Following a general
presentation on the facility and AREVA's role in today's nuclear
industry, Working Group participants toured the dry unloading
facility T0, spent fuel storage pool D, a vitrification facility T7,
and the control room of the UP3 plant. The tour provided Working
Group members a close look at the elaborate design and immense scale
of an industrial spent nuclear fuel reprocessing plant.
¶38. (U) FURTHER INFORMATION: Overseas posts requesting further
information may contact the following US Department of Energy (DOE)
officials:
Ed McGinnis
GNEP Steering Group Chair and
Deputy Assistant Secretary
Office of Nuclear Energy
U.S. Department of Energy
202 586-5253 (office)
202 425-2973 (mobile)
Edward.McGinnis@Nuclear.Energy.Gov
Beth Lisann
U.S. Steering Group Plus 1 Representative
202 586-0136 (office)
Elizabeth.lisann@doe.hq.gov
Andrea Duskas
202 586-6130 (office)
202 276-4199 (mobile)
Andrea.duskas@hq.doe.gov
Bernard Bluhm
202 586-8317 (office)
bernard.bluhm@nuclear.energy.gov
Pekala