

Currently released so far... 51122 / 251,287
Articles
Brazil
Sri Lanka
United Kingdom
Sweden
00. Editorial
United States
Latin America
Egypt
Jordan
Yemen
Thailand
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
2011/05/18
2011/05/19
2011/05/20
2011/05/21
2011/05/22
2011/05/23
2011/05/24
2011/05/25
2011/05/26
2011/05/27
2011/05/28
2011/05/29
2011/05/30
2011/05/31
2011/06/01
2011/06/02
2011/06/03
2011/06/04
2011/06/05
2011/06/06
2011/06/07
2011/06/08
2011/06/09
2011/06/10
2011/06/11
2011/06/12
2011/06/13
2011/06/14
2011/06/15
2011/06/16
2011/06/17
2011/06/18
2011/06/19
2011/06/20
2011/06/21
2011/06/22
2011/06/23
2011/06/24
2011/06/25
2011/06/26
2011/06/27
2011/06/28
2011/06/29
2011/06/30
2011/07/01
2011/07/02
2011/07/04
2011/07/05
2011/07/06
2011/07/07
2011/07/08
2011/07/10
2011/07/11
2011/07/12
2011/07/13
2011/07/14
2011/07/15
2011/07/16
2011/07/17
2011/07/18
2011/07/19
2011/07/20
2011/07/21
2011/07/22
2011/07/23
2011/07/25
2011/07/27
2011/07/28
2011/07/29
2011/07/31
2011/08/01
2011/08/02
2011/08/03
2011/08/05
2011/08/06
2011/08/07
2011/08/08
2011/08/09
2011/08/10
2011/08/11
2011/08/12
2011/08/13
2011/08/15
2011/08/16
2011/08/17
2011/08/18
2011/08/19
2011/08/21
2011/08/22
2011/08/23
2011/08/24
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Antananarivo
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Alexandria
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embasy Bonn
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Brazzaville
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangui
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Belfast
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Cotonou
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chiang Mai
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Chengdu
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
DIR FSINFATC
Consulate Dusseldorf
Consulate Durban
Consulate Dubai
Consulate Dhahran
Embassy Guatemala
Embassy Grenada
Embassy Georgetown
Embassy Gaborone
Consulate Guayaquil
Consulate Guangzhou
Consulate Guadalajara
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Hong Kong
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kolonia
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Krakow
Consulate Kolkata
Consulate Karachi
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Lusaka
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Lome
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy Libreville
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Leipzig
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Mission Geneva
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Mogadishu
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maseru
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Merida
Consulate Melbourne
Consulate Matamoros
Consulate Marseille
Embassy Nouakchott
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Nuevo Laredo
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Consulate Nagoya
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Praia
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Moresby
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Podgorica
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Hillah
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Surabaya
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy Tirana
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
Consulate Thessaloniki
USUN New York
USMISSION USTR GENEVA
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Mission CD Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
UN Rome
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vientiane
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AMGT
ASEC
AEMR
AR
APECO
AU
AORC
ADANA
AJ
AF
AFIN
AMED
AS
AM
ABLD
AFFAIRS
AMB
APER
ACOA
AND
AA
AE
AADP
AID
AO
AL
AG
AORD
ADM
AINF
AINT
ASEAN
AORG
ABT
APEC
AY
ASUP
ARF
AGOA
AVIAN
ATRN
ANET
AGIT
ASECVE
ABUD
AODE
ALOW
ADB
AN
ADPM
ASPA
ARABL
AFSN
AZ
AC
AIAG
AFSI
ASCE
ASIG
ACABQ
ADIP
AFGHANISTAN
AROC
ADCO
ACOTA
ANARCHISTS
AMEDCASCKFLO
AK
ARABBL
ASCH
ANTITERRORISM
AGRICULTURE
AOCR
ARR
ASSEMBLY
AORCYM
AFPK
ACKM
AGMT
AEC
APRC
AIN
AFPREL
ASFC
ASECTH
AFSA
AINR
AOPC
AFAF
AFARI
AX
ASECAF
ASECAFIN
AT
AFZAL
APCS
AGAO
AIT
ARCH
AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL
AMEX
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AORCD
AVIATION
ARAS
AINFCY
ACBAQ
AOPR
AREP
AOIC
ASEX
ASEK
AER
AGR
AMCT
AVERY
APR
AEMRS
AFU
AMG
ATPDEA
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AORL
ACS
AMCHAMS
AECL
AUC
ACAO
BA
BR
BB
BG
BEXP
BY
BRUSSELS
BU
BD
BTIO
BK
BL
BE
BMGT
BO
BM
BX
BN
BWC
BBSR
BTT
BC
BH
BILAT
BUSH
BHUM
BT
BTC
BMENA
BOND
BAIO
BP
BF
BRPA
BURNS
BUT
BBG
BCW
BOEHNER
BOL
BASHAR
BIDEN
BFIN
BZ
BEXPC
BTIU
CPAS
CA
CASC
CS
CBW
CIDA
CO
CODEL
CI
CROS
CU
CH
CWC
CMGT
CVIS
CDG
CTR
CG
CF
CHIEF
CJAN
CBSA
CE
CY
CB
CW
CM
CHR
CD
COE
CV
COUNTER
CT
CN
CPUOS
CTERR
CVR
CVPR
CDC
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CONS
COM
CACS
CR
CONTROLS
CAN
CACM
COMMERCE
CAMBODIA
CFIS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITES
CONDOLEEZZA
CZ
CTBT
CEN
CLINTON
CFED
CARC
CTM
CARICOM
CSW
CICTE
CYPRUS
CBE
CMGMT
CARSON
CWCM
CIVS
COUNTRYCLEARANCE
CENTCOM
CAPC
COPUOS
CKGR
CITEL
CQ
CITT
CIC
CARIB
CVIC
CAFTA
CVISU
CDB
CEDAW
CNC
CJUS
COMMAND
CENTER
COL
CAJC
CONSULAR
CLMT
CBC
CIA
CNARC
CIS
CEUDA
CHINA
CAC
CL
DR
DJ
DEMOCRATIC
DEMARCHE
DOMESTIC
DISENGAGEMENT
DB
DA
DHS
DAO
DCM
DAVID
DO
DEAX
DEFENSE
DEA
DTRO
DPRK
DOC
DTRA
DK
DAC
DOD
DRL
DRC
DCG
DE
DOT
DEPT
DOE
DS
DKEM
ECON
ETTC
EFIS
ETRD
EC
EMIN
EAGR
EAID
EFIN
EUN
ECIN
EG
EWWT
EINV
ENRG
ELAB
EPET
EIND
EN
EAIR
EUMEM
ECPS
ES
EI
ELTN
ET
EZ
EU
ER
EINT
ENGR
ECONOMIC
ENIV
EFTA
ETRN
EMS
EUREM
EPA
ESTH
EEB
EET
ENV
EAG
EXIM
ECTRD
ELNT
ENVIRONMENT
ECA
EAP
EINDIR
ETR
ECONOMY
ETRC
ELECTIONS
EICN
EXPORT
EARG
EGHG
EID
ETRO
EINF
EAIDHO
ECIP
EENV
EURM
EPEC
ERNG
ENERG
EIAD
EXBS
ED
EREL
ELAM
EK
EWT
ENGRD
EDEV
ECE
ENGY
EXIMOPIC
ETRDEC
ECCT
EUR
ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID
EFI
ECOSOC
EXTERNAL
ESCAP
ETCC
EENG
ERA
ENRD
ECLAC
ETRAD
EBRD
ENVR
ECONENRG
ELTNSNAR
ELAP
EPIT
EDUC
EAIDXMXAXBXFFR
EETC
EIVN
EDRC
EGOV
ETRA
EAIDRW
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ESA
ETRDGK
ENVI
ELN
EPRT
EPTED
ERTD
EUM
EAIDS
EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM
EDU
EV
EAIDAF
EDA
EPREL
EINVEFIN
EAGER
ETMIN
EUCOM
ECCP
EIDN
EINVKSCA
ENNP
EFINECONCS
ETC
EAIRASECCASCID
EINN
ETRP
ECONOMICS
ENERGY
EIAR
EINDETRD
ECONEFIN
EURN
ETRDEINVTINTCS
EFIM
ETIO
EATO
EIPR
EINVETC
ETTD
ETDR
EIQ
ECONCS
ENRGIZ
EAIG
ENTG
EUC
ERD
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECUN
FR
FI
FOREIGN
FARM
FIR
FAO
FK
FARC
FAS
FJ
FREEDOM
FAC
FINANCE
FBI
FTAA
FM
FCS
FAA
FORCE
FDA
FTA
FT
FCSC
FMGT
FINR
FIN
FDIC
FOR
FOI
FO
FMLN
FISO
GM
GERARD
GT
GA
GG
GR
GTIP
GH
GZ
GE
GB
GY
GAZA
GJ
GEORGE
GOI
GCC
GMUS
GI
GLOBAL
GV
GC
GL
GOV
GKGIC
GF
GWI
GIPNC
GUTIERREZ
GTMO
GANGS
GAERC
GUILLERMO
GASPAR
HR
HA
HYMPSK
HO
HK
HUMAN
HU
HN
HHS
HURI
HUD
HUMRIT
HUMANITARIAN
HUMANR
HL
HSTC
HILLARY
HCOPIL
HADLEY
HOURANI
HI
HUM
HEBRON
HUMOR
IZ
IN
IAEA
IS
IMO
ILO
IR
IC
IT
ITU
ID
IV
IMF
IBRD
IWC
ICAO
ICRC
INF
IO
IPR
ISO
IK
ISRAELI
IQ
ICES
IDB
INFLUENZA
IRAQI
ISCON
IGAD
IRAN
ITALY
IRAQ
ICTY
ICTR
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IQNV
IADB
INTERNAL
INMARSAT
IRDB
ILC
INCB
INRB
ICJ
ISRAEL
INR
IEA
ISPA
ICCAT
IOM
ITRD
IHO
IL
IFAD
ITRA
IDLI
ISCA
INL
INRA
INTELSAT
ISAF
ISPL
IRS
IEF
ITER
INDO
IIP
IND
IEFIN
IACI
IAHRC
INNP
IA
INTERPOL
IFIN
ISSUES
IZPREL
IRAJ
IF
ITPHUM
ITA
IP
IRPE
IDA
ISLAMISTS
ITF
INRO
IBET
IDP
IRC
KMDR
KPAO
KOMC
KNNP
KFLO
KDEM
KSUM
KIPR
KFLU
KE
KCRM
KJUS
KAWC
KZ
KSCA
KDRG
KCOR
KGHG
KPAL
KTIP
KMCA
KCRS
KPKO
KOLY
KRVC
KVPR
KG
KWBG
KTER
KS
KN
KSPR
KWMN
KV
KTFN
KFRD
KU
KSTC
KSTH
KISL
KGIC
KSEP
KFIN
KTEX
KTIA
KUNR
KCMR
KCIP
KMOC
KTDB
KBIO
KBCT
KMPI
KSAF
KACT
KFEM
KPRV
KPWR
KIRC
KCFE
KRIM
KHIV
KHLS
KVIR
KNNNP
KCEM
KLIG
KIRF
KNUP
KSAC
KNUC
KPGOV
KTDD
KIDE
KOMS
KLFU
KNNC
KMFO
KSEO
KJRE
KJUST
KMRS
KSRE
KGIT
KPIR
KPOA
KUWAIT
KIVP
KICC
KSCS
KPOL
KSEAO
KRCM
KSCI
KNAP
KGLB
KICA
KCUL
KPRM
KFSC
KQ
KPOP
KPFO
KPALAOIS
KREC
KBWG
KR
KTTB
KNAR
KCOM
KESS
KINR
KOCI
KWN
KCSY
KREL
KTBT
KFTN
KW
KRFD
KFLOA
KHDP
KNEP
KIND
KHUM
KSKN
KOMO
KDRL
KTFIN
KSOC
KPO
KGIV
KSTCPL
KSI
KPRP
KFPC
KNNB
KNDP
KICCPUR
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KDMR
KFCE
KIMMITT
KMCC
KMNP
KSEC
KOMCSG
KGCC
KRAD
KCRP
KAUST
KWAWC
KCHG
KRDP
KPAS
KTIAPARM
KPAOPREL
KWGB
KIRP
KMIG
KLAB
KSEI
KHSA
KNPP
KPAONZ
KWWW
KGHA
KY
KCRIM
KCRCM
KGCN
KPLS
KIIP
KPAOY
KTRD
KTAO
KJU
KBTS
KWAC
KFIU
KNNO
KPAI
KILS
KPA
KRCS
KWBGSY
KNPPIS
KNNPMNUC
KNPT
KERG
KLTN
KPREL
KTLA
KO
KAWK
KVRP
KAID
KX
KENV
KWCI
KNPR
KCFC
KNEI
KFTFN
KTFM
KCERS
KDEMAF
KMEPI
KEMS
KBTR
KEDU
KIRL
KNNR
KMPT
KPDD
KPIN
KDEV
KFRP
KTBD
KMSG
KWWMN
KWBC
KA
KOM
KWNM
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KRGY
KNNF
KICR
KIFR
KWMNCS
KPAK
KDDG
KCGC
KID
KNSD
KMPF
KWMM
MARR
MX
MASS
MOPS
MNUC
MCAP
MTCRE
MRCRE
MTRE
MASC
MY
MK
MG
MU
MILI
MO
MZ
MEPP
MCC
MEDIA
MOPPS
MI
MAS
MW
MP
MEPN
MV
MD
MR
MC
MCA
MT
MIL
MARITIME
MOPSGRPARM
MAAR
MOOPS
ML
MA
MN
MNUCPTEREZ
MTCR
MUNC
MPOS
MONUC
MGMT
MURRAY
MACP
MINUSTAH
MCCONNELL
MGT
MNUR
MF
MEPI
MOHAMMAD
MAR
MAPP
MNU
MFA
MTS
MLS
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MED
MNVC
MIK
MBM
MILITARY
MAPS
MARAD
MDC
MACEDONIA
MASSMNUC
MUCN
MQADHAFI
MPS
NZ
NATO
NI
NO
NU
NG
NL
NPT
NS
NA
NP
NASA
NSF
NEA
NANCY
NSG
NRR
NATIONAL
NMNUC
NC
NSC
NAS
NARC
NELSON
NATEU
NDP
NIH
NK
NIPP
NR
NERG
NSSP
NE
NTDB
NT
NEGROPONTE
NGO
NATOIRAQ
NAR
NZUS
NCCC
NH
NAFTA
NEW
NRG
NUIN
NOVO
NATOPREL
NV
NICHOLAS
NPA
NSFO
NW
NORAD
NPG
NOAA
OPRC
OPDC
OTRA
OECD
OVIP
OREP
ODC
OIIP
OAS
OSCE
OPIC
OMS
OFDP
OFDA
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OSCI
OM
OPAD
ODPC
OIC
ODIP
OPPI
ORA
OCEA
OREG
OMIG
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXP
OPEC
OFPD
OAU
OCII
OIL
OVIPPRELUNGANU
OSHA
OPCD
OPCR
OF
OFDPQIS
OSIC
OHUM
OTR
OBSP
OGAC
OESC
OVP
ON
OES
OTAR
OCS
PREL
PGOV
PARM
PINR
PHUM
PM
PREF
PTER
PK
PINS
PBIO
PHSA
PE
PBTS
PA
PL
POL
PAK
POV
POLITICS
POLICY
PO
PRELTBIOBA
PKO
PIN
PNAT
PU
PGOVPREL
PALESTINIAN
PTERPGOV
PELOSI
PAS
PP
PTEL
PROP
PRELAF
PRHUM
PRE
PUNE
PIRF
PVOV
PROG
PERSONS
PROV
PKK
PRGOV
PH
PLAB
PDEM
PCI
PRL
PRM
PINSO
PERM
PETR
PPAO
PERL
PBS
PETERS
PRELBR
PCON
POLITICAL
PMIL
POLM
PKPA
PNUM
PLO
PTERM
PJUS
PARMP
PNIR
PHUMKPAL
PG
PREZ
PGIC
PAO
PROTECTION
PRELPK
PGOVENRG
PATTY
PSOC
PARTIES
PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ
PMIG
PAIGH
PARK
PETER
PHUS
PKPO
PGOVECON
POUS
PMAR
PWBG
PAR
PGOVGM
PHUH
PTE
PY
POLUN
PDOV
PGOVSOCI
PGOVPM
PRELEVU
PGOR
PBTSRU
PHUMA
PHUMR
PPD
PGV
PRAM
PARMS
PINL
PSI
PKPAL
PPA
PTERE
PGOF
PINO
PREO
PHAS
PAC
PRESL
PORG
PS
PGVO
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PINT
PRELP
PREFA
PNG
PTBS
PFOR
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PREK
PHJM
POLINT
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PECON
PEACE
PROCESS
PLN
PEDRO
PF
PGPV
PCUL
PGGV
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGIV
PHUMPREL
POGOV
PEL
PBT
PAMQ
PINF
PSEPC
POSTS
PAHO
PHUMPGOV
PGOC
PNR
RS
RP
RU
RW
RFE
RCMP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
REFORM
RO
ROW
ROBERT
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RELATIONS
RAY
ROBERTG
RIGHTS
RM
RATIFICATION
RREL
RBI
RICE
ROOD
REL
RODHAM
RGY
RUEHZO
RELIGIOUS
RELFREE
RUEUN
RELAM
RSP
RF
REO
REGIONAL
RUPREL
RI
REMON
RPEL
RSO
SCUL
SENV
SOCI
SZ
SNAR
SO
SP
SU
SY
SI
SMIG
SYR
SA
SW
SF
SR
SYRIA
SNARM
START
SPECIALIST
SG
SNIG
SCI
SGWI
SE
SIPDIS
SANC
SELAB
SN
SETTLEMENTS
SCIENCE
SENVENV
SENS
SPCE
SPAS
SECURITY
SENC
SOCIETY
SOSI
SENVEAGREAIDTBIOECONSOCIXR
SEN
SPECI
ST
SL
SENVCASCEAIDID
SC
SECRETARY
STR
SNA
SOCIS
SADC
SEP
SK
SHUM
SYAI
SMIL
STEPHEN
SNRV
SKCA
SENSITIVE
SECI
SCUD
SCRM
SGNV
SECTOR
SAARC
SENVSXE
SWMN
STEINBERG
SOPN
SOCR
SCRS
SWE
SARS
SNARIZ
SUDAN
SENVQGR
SAN
SM
SFNV
SSA
SPCVIS
SOFA
SCULKPAOECONTU
SENVKGHG
SHI
SEVN
SH
SNARCS
SNARN
SIPRS
TBIO
TW
TRGY
TSPA
TU
TPHY
TI
TX
TH
TIP
TSPL
TNGD
TZ
TS
TC
TK
TURKEY
TERRORISM
TPSL
TINT
TRSY
TERFIN
TPP
TT
TECHNOLOGY
TE
TAGS
TRAFFICKING
TJ
TN
TO
TD
TP
TREATY
TR
TA
TIO
TECH
TF
TRAD
TNDG
TWI
TPSA
TWL
TAUSCHER
TRBY
TL
TV
THPY
TSPAM
TREL
TRT
TNAR
TFIN
TWCH
THOMMA
THOMAS
TERROR
TRY
TBID
UK
UNESCO
UNSC
UNGA
UN
US
UZ
USEU
UG
UP
UNAUS
UNMIK
USTR
UY
USUN
UNEP
UNDC
UV
UNPUOS
UNSCR
USAID
UNODC
UNRCR
UNHCR
UNDP
UNCRIME
UA
UNHRC
UNRWA
UNO
UNCND
UNCHR
USAU
UNICEF
USPS
UNOMIG
UNESCOSCULPRELPHUMKPALCUIRXFVEKV
UR
UNFICYP
UNCITRAL
UNAMA
UNVIE
USTDA
USNC
UNCSD
USCC
UNEF
UNGAPL
USSC
UNMIC
UNTAC
UNCLASSIFIED
USDA
UNCTAD
USGS
UNFPA
UNSE
USOAS
UE
UAE
UNCHS
UNDESCO
UNC
UNSCS
UKXG
UNGACG
UNHR
UNBRO
UNCHC
UNFCYP
UNIDROIT
WHTI
WIPO
WTRO
WHO
WTO
WMO
WFP
WEET
WS
WE
WA
WHA
WBG
WILLIAM
WI
WSIS
WCL
WEBZ
WZ
WW
WWBG
WMD
WWT
WMN
WWARD
WITH
WTRQ
WCO
WEU
WB
WBEG
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 03FRANKFURT7038, Securities Exchanges, Clearing and Settlement:
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #03FRANKFURT7038.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
03FRANKFURT7038 | 2003-08-26 13:01 | 2011-08-24 01:00 | UNCLASSIFIED | Consulate Frankfurt |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 07 FRANKFURT 007038
SIPDIS
STATE FOR EUR PDAS RIES, EB BAY, EUR/AGS, AND EUR/ERA
STATE PASS FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD
STATE PASS NSC FOR CLOUD
TREASURY FOR DAS SOBEL
TREASURY ALSO FOR IMI HARLOW, AUSTIN
PARIS ALSO FOR OECD
TREASURY FOR OCC RUTLEDGE, MCMAHON
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ECON EFIN EUN
SUBJECT: Securities Exchanges, Clearing and Settlement:
Alliances Made and Broken; Poker or Chess?
T-IA-F-03-0042
This cable is sensitive but unclassified. Not/not for
Internet distribution.
¶1. (SBU) Introduction: The European world of clearing
and settlement is not as boring as these dreary back-office
chores imply. Intense rivalry in the market place has
become even more so - spreading beyond the continent, across
the channel and across the Atlantic. Deutsche Borse lost
its bid for the London Stock Exchange three years ago and is
ending its joint venture with the Chicago Board of Trade
(CBOT) only to find the French-based Euronext team striking
up alliances with the British and the CBOT.
¶2. (SBU) Policy wonks have also been busy. The European
System of Central Banks (ESCB) and the Committee of European
Securities Regulators (CESR) issued a consultation paper
proposing standards for clearing and settlement. Among the
interesting features of these proposals is the notion that
clearing and settlement systems should be open to investment
firms, but such firms from third countries could be denied
access if their home market supervision was not considered
"adequate." The European Parliament adopted a report to hem
in competition between custodians and clearing and
settlement organizations. In April the Giovannini Group
presented a critical pathway for liberalization of Europe's
clearing and settlement structure. Lots of good ideas and
intentions.
¶3. (SBU) Enter the European Commission. . This fall
the Commission is scheduled to release a second
communication and, depending on reactions, might issue draft
legislative proposals in December. To date, Commission
officials assert that they are content to let the market
sort itself out before taking legislative action. Observed
one specialist, market pressures are generating solutions
that the Commission could never legislate - so best leave
the sector alone.
¶4. (SBU) The rough and tumble world of clearing and
settlement is more like poker than chess - bluffs, calls and
raising the stakes. The Commission, congenitally condemned
to initiate but not enact legislation, must confine its game
to chess. End Summary.
Setting the Scene: The Players and the Pot
------------------------------------------
¶5. (SBU) The European players in the clearing and
settlement game are very different from those in the United
States. Herein lie a strength and a weakness. The strength
is that the largest European players are part of an
"exchange complex," that combines clearing and settlement
activities with cash listing and trading (equities) (the so-
called "vertical silo" approach) and derivatives trading.
This allows revenues to be generated from different business
lines generally resulting in resilience in the bottom line
when one business line experiences weakness, e.g. lower
equities trading as is the case at present.
¶6. (SBU) The largest of these complexes in Europe are
the Euronext group and Deutsche Borse. Smaller, but
similarly structured complexes, exist in Italy, Spain and
Sweden. According to the MSMOW study published in June 2003,
Deutsche Borse received 15% of its revenues from cash
listing and trading, 23% from derivates trading and
clearing, 43% from clearing and settlement, and 19% from
information products and systems. Euronext was similarly
diversified: 26% from cash listing and trading, 34% from
derivatives trading, 20% from clearing and settlement, and
17% from information products. Why is this interesting?
One German expert explained that since many of its
activities are similar, investing one time in software
development can generate uses across its product line;
increasing the load on those systems drives down marginal
costs, increasing profitability.
¶7. (SBU) Compare this diversity with that of the London
Stock Exchange, New York Stock Exchange and Nasdaq, all with
the bulk of their revenues coming from cash listing and
trading (LSE 55%; NYSE, 74%, Nasdaq 71%). This "horizontal"
approach allows investors to move from different systems for
each aspect of securities execution, i.e. trading, clearing
and settling. As these exchanges are heavily dependent on
one or two business lines, in present market conditions,
lower listing and trading activities mean a lower total
bottom line.
¶8. (SBU) The weakness in Europe is that there is no one
institution that clears and settles - implying heavy
investments by the clearing and settlement industry and
potential risks to investors. In the US the Depository
Trust Clearing Corporation clears and settles all equity
securities in the US. The Options Clearing Corporation does
so for equity options. Futures are somewhat different,
being able to be cleared and settled in the system where
they are traded.
¶9. (SBU) What is the competition in Europe about? The
MSMOW study estimates that European exchange complexes took
in revenues of euro 5.2 billion in 2002. Profit margins
were roughly 26%. Worth a good scuffle for a part of that
pie.
¶10. (SBU) Competition, however, should be viewed on a
broader scale, that is, by considering the larger pot of
where the investor "spends" money in capital markets
transactions in Europe. The MSMOW study estimates that
total to be euro 40 billion. Of that amount, exchanges and
centralized depositories (institutions holding securities
that enables securities transactions to be processed by book
entries) took in euro 3.5 billion, custodians (entities that
safe keep securities for customers) euro 4.5 billion, data
system providers 2.5 billion, and a hefty euro 29.5 billion
went to commissions and spreads. Now that is a value chain
worthy of an all out fight - exchanges want to cut out the
middle man, custodians want to restrain exchanges, and
middle men want to keep business in house (internalize
transactions) or at least away from an order book open to
all on an electronic exchange (hear the mouse click away
their revenues?).
Action: Market Players
-----------------------
¶11. (SBU) Three years ago Deutsche Borse was going for
the "golden ring." A merger with the London Stock Exchange
was rumored in the press and its "vertical" processing of
trading, clearing and settlement (straight through
processing) was envied, copied, and attacked as
anticompetitive. Deutsche Borse struck up a joint venture
in the derivatives market with the CBOT in the United
States. Life seemed beautiful; but it still was life. The
merger didn't happen, other exchange complexes have
developed or are planning their own straight through
processing systems, Commission competition authorities have
opened an investigation, and the joint venture with the CBOT
will be dissolved at the end of 2003.
¶12. (SBU) Instead of Deutsche Borse domination, there
seems to have been a shift to what one analyst terms the
"ABW Strategy," or an "anybody but Werner strategy,"
referring to the head of Deutsche Borse who has been
referred to as "visionary," "opinionated," or "abrasive.".
Highlights include:
- Merger of CrestCo with Euroclear (the settlement
operations for the London Stock Exchange and Euronext,
respectively);
- Proposed merger of the London Clearing House and
Clearnet (the clearing operations for the LSE and Euronex
respectively)
- The CBOT replacing its trading platform under license
from Eurex, the Deutsche Borse derivatives operation, wit
new contract with LIFFE Connect, designed and built by
Euronext.liffe (over a year ago Euronext had purchased th
London International Financial Futures Exchange)
- Nasdaq Europe has announced it will close down its
exchange in Brussels at the beginning of 2004 and will cl
Nasdaq Germany by the end of August.
¶13. (SBU) Deutsche Borse, however, has managed a few
surprises of its own. DB has introduced a system to help
brokers/dealers to internalize transactions (if they can't
beat'em, join'em - or at least made some money out of the
deal) and has announced that it will:
- seek to establish its own licensed exchange in the US
to compete in the derivatives market;
- open its system to investors from other systems,
forsaking the "silo approach" if others (read Euronext) d
the same;
- implement an automated daytime bridge between
Clearstream International (its settlement bank) and
Euroclear Bank to allow same-day bridge transactions;
- attract Dutch brokers and dealers displeased with their
Euronext association (fees went up this year for the firs
time) (the LSE also seeking to pick up some of the busine
from the disgruntled Dutch traders).
Kinda leaves you breathless, waiting for the next move.
Action: Policy Wonks
--------------------
¶14. (SBU) European policy officials also have ventured
into the clearing and settlement terrain.
- The European Commission is collecting comments on its
May 2002 Communication on clearing and settlement and is
expected to publish another communication in September;
- The European Commission's November 2002 proposal for
the revision of the Investment Services Directive would
require member states to ensure investment firms from oth
member states have access to central counter party and
clearing and settlement systems in their territory and th
stock exchanges allow participants to designate the syste
for the settlement of transactions;
- European Parliament adopted a report in December 2002
on clearing and settlement proposing that core settlement
services should be managed as a user-owned service govern
by rule of a non-profit entity and that central securitie
depositories perform only settlement services and not "va
added" services;
- European Commission competition authorities opened an
infringement proceeding in March against Deutsche Borse's
Clearstream Banking AG for refusing Euroclear Bank's acce
to the settlement platform for more than two years and fo
charging higher transaction prices to Euroclear than to
other national central securities depositories outside
Germany.
- Giovaninni Group's Second Report on Clearing and
Settlement issued in April presented a program and schedu
for removing barriers to clearing and settlement within t
EU.
- ESCB/CESR's Consultative Report on Standards for
Securities and Clearing Settlements in the European Union
issued at the end of July proposed standards to sustain
integration in the EU by having one single set of standar
for a regulatory framework.
The ESCB/CESR work deserves special mention.
ESCB/CESR: Softer than a Law but Harder than a
Recommendation
--------------------------------------------- --
¶15. (SBU) The ESCB/CESR Consultative Paper was prepared
by a ESCB-CESR Working Group comprised of representatives of
15 national banks of the EU and representatives of CESR.
The Working Group has proposed 19 standards for clearing and
settlement systems covering such topics as legal framework,
settlement cycles, central counter parties, central
securities depositories, delivery versus payment, risk
controls, operational reliability, governance, access,
transparency, and regulation, supervision and oversight, and
risks in cross-system links. Comments on the paper are due
by October 31. A public hearing will be held on October 2
in Paris.
¶16. (SBU) The paper reflects the Giovaninni Group's
Second Report, the Group of Thirty's 20 recommendations on
clearing and settlement systems released in January, and the
Recommendations for Securities and Settlements Systems
issued by the Committee on Payment and Settlement Systems
(CPSS) and the Technical Committee of the International
Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) in November
¶2001.
¶17. (SBU) The standards aim to provide a consistent basis
for regulation, supervision and oversight of securities
clearing and settlement systems, enhance the safety,
soundness and efficiency of such systems, protect investors,
promote competitive EU markets, and avoid systemic risks.
¶18. (SBU) These standards are unique in several aspects.
The first, is that they are "standards." They are not
recommendations to take or leave. Neither are they
mandatory since they would not have Community law status.
Rather, the ECB/CESR Group believes that standards will be
of a more binding nature than recommendations and that
regulators will implement them on a "best-endeavor" basis.
This has worked for the ECB in its standards for securities
settlement systems in credit operations in the ESCB.
However, the ESCB/CESR proposed standards on clearing and
settlement go well beyond ESCB activities.
¶19. (SBU) A second interesting feature is the proposal to
apply many of the standards to major custodians, including
custodian banks, some of which clear and settle in-house
rather than going to local clearing and settlement systems.
Some of these banks have significant operations and would be
considered "systemically important custodians." The
ECB/CESR has proposed four criteria to identify such
institutions: (1) magnitude of activities (e.g. 5% of EU
market or 25% of a domestic market); (2) number of systems;
(3) nature and number of clients; and (4) the possibility of
being replaced in the event of failure. Banks that have a
large presence in the custodian business in Europe include
BNP Paribas and Citigroup.
¶20. (SBU) Finally, the standards go well beyond the
competence of national banks and securities supervisors to
cover tax, accounting and other legal issues. To ensure
consistent implementation and compliance, the Group notes
the importance of cooperation and information exchange among
competent authorities. To ensure such cooperation is done
in a regular and structured manner, the Group volunteers to
take on a monitoring role to organize and co-ordinate
assessments of implementation.
Some Observations: Connecting the Dots
--------------------------------------
¶21. (SBU) Actions by market participants and policy wonks
have been, to some degree, symbiotic. Here are some
examples.
(a) Cross-Border Activities: Increased cross-border
activities in clearing and settlement presaged by the
Crestco and Euroclear merger or anticipated merger be
LCH and Clearnet suggests that standardization of rul
not only needed to integrate the EU market, but to en
that integration at the company level works at the
operations level, bringing promised efficiencies to
investors while protecting them from increased risks
cross-border transactions. Thus, the ESCB/CESR stand
have some urgency from a supervisory point of view.
is some time, however. According to a London-based e
not much has changed in the actual operations of Cres
Euroclear, for example, so the continental and UK sys
still run separately.
(b) Access: Deutsche Borse's willingness to open its
system to investors that trade on other platforms ref
the pressure from the ISD proposal, the Commission's
competition policy investigation, and, to some extent
ESCB/CESR standard on access. Access is not to be ab
The ESCB/CESR standard would require objective and pu
disclosed criteria that permit "fair and open access"
still being able to control risk. Access could be de
a clearing and settlement system if it posed risks th
could not be effectively controlled. What about acce
investment firms from other countries? Access could
denied, according to ESCB/CESR if there is a lack of
"adequate supervision" and doubts about the enforceab
of the legal powers of the service provider in the ho
country.
(c) Governance: The ESCB/CESR standard on governance c
for arrangements designed to fulfill public interest
requirements and to promote the objectives of owners
users. This reflects, in part, the views in the Euro
Parliament report proposing to require settlement sys
be managed as a user-owned non-profit organization.
European Parliament's view is also supported by a gro
called "Fair and Clear," composed of large custodian
including such big players as BNP Paribas and Citigro
(d) Value Added Services: The ESCB/CESR proposed stand
on risk controls implies that clearing and settlement
systems could extend credits, thus competing with ban
The ESCB/CESR proposed standard states that operators
systemically important systems should not run credit
but where they extend credit they should fully collat
such exposures. Should such systems extend credits t
support the orderly functioning of the market, they c
offer uncollateralized credit but only to institution
high credit standing. The European Parliament report
proposed that settlement systems not be permitted to
such credits, a view shared by "Fair and Clear." Her
concerns coincide: concerns about risks to settlement
systems from credit lending and concerns about compet
to custodian banks from settlement systems offering c
services to their clients. A German expert points ou
is a false issue, in that settlement systems are lice
banks anyway. Moreover, investment firms enjoy the
competition afforded by several players in the
settlement/custodian business, keeping costs lower an
service better than otherwise might be the case.
Where will Competition Drive the Market?
----------------------------------------
¶22. (SBU) Allowing the market to find "solutions" to
efficient trading, clearing and settlement systems sounds
nice. But what does it mean? Where will the market take
the trading and post-trading infrastructure? Not being
experts ourselves, we listen to what our betters have to
say.
¶23. (SBU) The MSMOW study presents there views on how
several key areas may develop:
(1) Silo versus horizontal approach: The vertical
"silo" structure of exchange complexes that offer
clearing and settling and straight through proces
been criticized as anti-competitive. A horizontal
allows investors access to the trading, or cleari
settling systems. The study suggests that this d
burn out as market participants and regulators lo
expensive costs and adopt pragmatic solutions. V
structures will become "interoperable" over time
exchange complexes will be able to fulfill their
providing market infrastructure and making a prof
provided they continue to deliver lower all-in tr
costs. So far, this seems to be the trend.
(2) Separation of Depository from Banking Services:
Settlement systems will have a tough time competi
banks by offering value added services, in the MS
view. Settlement banks, while banks, don't offer
range of banking services. When the market picks
study expect exchanges will stick to their core b
(3) Centralized clearing systems: The study "stron
believes" that centralized clearing will receive
from Basle II. Central counter party mechanisms
manage risk and reduce systemic risks. Banks wil
such mechanisms to reduce risks and corresponding
charges. The ESCB/CESR standard on central count
goes in the same direction. It states that where
benefits of using a central counter party outweig
costs, market participants should either use the
an existing one or establish one of their own.
(4) Internalization versus on Exchange Trading: Th
suggests that continental exchanges that use elec
trading and a central order book for equity tradi
continue to capture a large market share - betwee
trading. In the UK, where two-thirds of trades a
"facilitated" rather than placed directly on an o
book, the study expects little change. In its op
customers and the size of orders will dictate the
exchange trading and internalization in each mark
provided regulation doesn't favor one or the othe
Policy: The Wild Card
---------------------
¶24. (SBU) The dynamics of the market place are like a
game of poker: increasing investment stakes in high tech
infrastructure, improving the hand by striking up more
alliances or products, and bluffing about the strategy for
improved business. Needs a strong constitution. But the
winner's take could be considerable.
¶25. (SBU) Enter the European Commission. To date, the
Commission officials assert that they have been content in
allowing market forces to drive changes in the clearing and
settlement market. Moreover, others are trying to do some
spadework to prepare the terrain. The Giovannini Report and
now the ESCB/CESR standards point to the need for member
states to take action to bring down legal, regulatory and
tax barriers. The ESCB/CESR use of "standards" puts more
pressure on supervisors to take action. This is still short
of legislation. Nonetheless, it could be a not so subtle
threat that if the market doesn't move itself, momentum
could build for some type of legislative action.
Parliament's report favors legislation, as does the "Fair
and Clear" group and others, such as the London Stock
Exchange, that believe that clearing or clearing and
settlement, should be regulated as a public utility.
¶26. (SBU) The role for specific legislation is not clear.
With so many pieces of legislation pending under the
Financial Services Action Plan (FSAP) that will have a
significant impact on the financial market place
(implementation of the prospectuses, market abuse and
financial conglomerates directives and the accounting
regulation; potential passage of the transparency and
investment services directives) the Commission will be
forgiven if not blessed, for letting these and related
market-driven changes in clearing and settlement systems run
their course. Implementing enacted FSAP legislation as well
as the ESCB/CESR standards should be a priority before
assessing what, if anything needs to be done through
Community law.
¶27. (SBU) Such an approach is not at all certain. The
MSMOW study regards regulation as a "wildcard." It observes
that "one should never underestimate the unpredictable
nature of lawmaking in Brussels or nationally and potential
unintended consequences of legislation." Amen to that.
While the market is playing poker, the Commission must and
should be thinking chess.
¶28. (SBU) The report was coordinated with Embassies
Berlin and London and USEU Brussels.
(U) POC: James Wallar, Treasury Representative, e-mail
wallarjg2@state.gov; tel. 49-(69)-7535-2431, fax 49-
(69)-7535-2238.
Bodde