Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 51122 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 10KABUL468, The Places In Between: Afghanistan Dreams of an East-West

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #10KABUL468.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
10KABUL468 2010-02-07 12:55 2011-08-24 01:00 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Kabul
VZCZCXRO3438
OO RUEHDBU RUEHPW RUEHSL
DE RUEHBUL #0468/01 0381255
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 071255Z FEB 10 ZDK
FM AMEMBASSY KABUL
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 5423
INFO RUCNAFG/AFGHANISTAN COLLECTIVE
RUEHRO/AMEMBASSY ROME 5270
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 KABUL 000468 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPT FOR S/SRAP, SCA/FO, SCA/RA, SCA/A 
 
E.O. 12958 N/A 
TAGS: ELTN EMIN EAID EFIN PGOV PREL AF
SUBJECT: The Places In Between: Afghanistan Dreams of an East-West 
Highway 
 
KABUL 00000468  001.2 OF 002 
 
 
1. (U) Summary: Afghanistan's Ministry of Public Works (MPW) 
recently presented donors a formal proposal for an east-west 
highway, one of the most ambitious and expensive infrastructure 
projects proposed in the post-Taliban era.  The road would create a 
trade and development corridor stretching from the Iranian to 
Pakistani borders and a shorter alternative to the nearly complete 
ring road.  With an estimated cost above $1 billion, extensive donor 
outreach and coordination will be necessary to ensure this signature 
project is funded and completed.  Although India has expressed 
interest in supporting this project, it was not represented at the 
donor meeting.  We will make sure Indian Embassy representatives are 
invited to the follow-up meetings.  We will also continue to 
coordinate with the Japanese and Italian Embassies, as both their 
Ambassadors have expressed possible interest in the project.  End 
summary. 
 
The Road: A Major Undertaking 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
 
2. (U) At a February 3 meeting, the MPW unveiled a plan for a 
665-kilometer highway from Herat to Gardandewal via the Salma Dam, 
Kamenj, Bedan and Chaghcharan.  (The Italian Government, which was 
in attendance, has already committed to fund a road from Gardandewal 
to Kabul.)  Bisecting the ring road, the highway would cut through 
some of Afghanistan's most rugged territory and would gain nearly 
7,000 feet in altitude from Herat to Ghor and Bamyan provinces. 
According to the MPW, the United Nations wanted to build the road in 
the 1950s, and the U.S. expressed interest in 2002 but was unable to 
identify funding.  If funded, MPW representatives said the road 
should take five years to build. 
 
3. (U) Approximately 1 million Afghans live in areas along the 
potential road.  Central Afghanistan is one of the poorest areas of 
the country, and many residents migrate to cities in search of work. 
 MPW representatives said a road would ease the burden on 
Afghanistan's cities by improving the economy of the central 
provinces, creating incentives for migrants to return.  MPW also 
estimates that a road would lower vehicle operating costs by $48 
million per year by reducing the driving distance between Kabul and 
Herat from 1,047 to 750 kilometers.  A highway could increase 
tourism to the historic sites along its route, and many sites with 
mineral potential, including marble mines at Chesti Sharif, lie near 
the road. 
 
Cost Estimates May Not be Realistic 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
 
4. (U) The feasibility study for the road, completed in 2005, 
estimates a cost of $600,000 per kilometer and a total cost of $432 
million.  However, road experts in attendance agreed the current 
cost of construction on similar roads is between $800,000 and $1 
million per kilometer - before accounting for security, consultant 
and project management fees and the cost of demining, environmental 
mitigation and resettlement.  These supplemental costs tack on an 
additional 65 to 70 percent of costs, pushing the cost per kilometer 
toward $1.5 million - and the total cost to approximately $1 billion 
at current prices. 
 
5. (U) MPW's proposal divides the project into six portions.  The 
ministry seeks donors for each.  Stated costs per section range from 
$17.4 million for Kamenj - Bedan to $198 million for Chaghcharan - 
Gardandewal.  However, here too, the actual cost of these sections 
will likely reach $35 million and $400 million, respectively, when 
security and consultant costs are added and the construction costs 
are computed more accurately. 
 
Donors Interested, But Need More Information 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
 
6. (U) Besides the Government of Italy, other potential non-U.S. 
donors in attendance included the World Bank, Asian Development 
Bank, Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA), Germany's KfW 
Development Bank and the European Commission.  (Note: the EC 
representative announced his organization cannot commit to 
large-scale infrastructure funding but is able to share its 
experience funding the earlier Kabul-Jalalabad-Torkham Gate road.) 
The Italian Government representative said Italy is interested in 
supporting additional sections of the road, mainly around Herat, 
where Italy oversees Regional Command - West, but Rome has only 
authorized $12 million over three years from 2011, and only as part 
of a multilateral consortium.  India has expressed interest in this 
project but was not represented at the meeting.  Some donors 
broached the idea of utilizing the Afghanistan Reconstruction Trust 
Fund, a pool of assistance from many countries, as a possible 
funding mechanism, particularly since even the least expensive 
sections are beyond the reach of small donors. 
 
7. (U) MPW representatives emphasized that this meeting was an 
initial presentation and that more specific, detailed information 
 
KABUL 00000468  002.2 OF 002 
 
 
will be provided to interested donors.  Attendees questioned where 
this project stands in the long list of the Afghan Government's 
development priorities. 
 
8. (U) Comment: An east-west road is a compelling project, despite 
its difficulty and cost.  The ring road has brought tangible 
benefits to people living near it and the country as a whole, and a 
central road is a logical next step.  Experience building the ring 
road has shown that security conditions near a project site can 
change dramatically in short time and donors and contractors must 
commit to finishing large-scale projects despite changes on the 
ground.  As a result, the Afghan Government must present a more 
realistic estimate of its cost and actively coordinate among donors. 
 Assuming GIRoA does so, we will actively work to support this 
project among other donors, and will consider how we can add support 
given our own limited infrastructure budget.  (NB: During a meeting 
with Ambassador Wayne on February 4 (septel), the Japanese 
Ambassador noted Japan's potential interest in the road and we 
agreed both Embassies will keep in touch on this project.) End 
comment. 
 
EIKENBERRY