

Currently released so far... 51122 / 251,287
Articles
Brazil
Sri Lanka
United Kingdom
Sweden
00. Editorial
United States
Latin America
Egypt
Jordan
Yemen
Thailand
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
2011/05/18
2011/05/19
2011/05/20
2011/05/21
2011/05/22
2011/05/23
2011/05/24
2011/05/25
2011/05/26
2011/05/27
2011/05/28
2011/05/29
2011/05/30
2011/05/31
2011/06/01
2011/06/02
2011/06/03
2011/06/04
2011/06/05
2011/06/06
2011/06/07
2011/06/08
2011/06/09
2011/06/10
2011/06/11
2011/06/12
2011/06/13
2011/06/14
2011/06/15
2011/06/16
2011/06/17
2011/06/18
2011/06/19
2011/06/20
2011/06/21
2011/06/22
2011/06/23
2011/06/24
2011/06/25
2011/06/26
2011/06/27
2011/06/28
2011/06/29
2011/06/30
2011/07/01
2011/07/02
2011/07/04
2011/07/05
2011/07/06
2011/07/07
2011/07/08
2011/07/10
2011/07/11
2011/07/12
2011/07/13
2011/07/14
2011/07/15
2011/07/16
2011/07/17
2011/07/18
2011/07/19
2011/07/20
2011/07/21
2011/07/22
2011/07/23
2011/07/25
2011/07/27
2011/07/28
2011/07/29
2011/07/31
2011/08/01
2011/08/02
2011/08/03
2011/08/05
2011/08/06
2011/08/07
2011/08/08
2011/08/09
2011/08/10
2011/08/11
2011/08/12
2011/08/13
2011/08/15
2011/08/16
2011/08/17
2011/08/18
2011/08/19
2011/08/21
2011/08/22
2011/08/23
2011/08/24
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Antananarivo
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Alexandria
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embasy Bonn
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Brazzaville
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangui
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Belfast
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Cotonou
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chiang Mai
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Chengdu
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
DIR FSINFATC
Consulate Dusseldorf
Consulate Durban
Consulate Dubai
Consulate Dhahran
Embassy Guatemala
Embassy Grenada
Embassy Georgetown
Embassy Gaborone
Consulate Guayaquil
Consulate Guangzhou
Consulate Guadalajara
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Hong Kong
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kolonia
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Krakow
Consulate Kolkata
Consulate Karachi
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Lusaka
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Lome
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy Libreville
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Leipzig
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Mission Geneva
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Mogadishu
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maseru
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Merida
Consulate Melbourne
Consulate Matamoros
Consulate Marseille
Embassy Nouakchott
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Nuevo Laredo
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Consulate Nagoya
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Praia
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Moresby
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Podgorica
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Hillah
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Surabaya
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy Tirana
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
Consulate Thessaloniki
USUN New York
USMISSION USTR GENEVA
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Mission CD Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
UN Rome
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vientiane
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AMGT
ASEC
AEMR
AR
APECO
AU
AORC
ADANA
AJ
AF
AFIN
AMED
AS
AM
ABLD
AFFAIRS
AMB
APER
ACOA
AND
AA
AE
AADP
AID
AO
AL
AG
AORD
ADM
AINF
AINT
ASEAN
AORG
ABT
APEC
AY
ASUP
ARF
AGOA
AVIAN
ATRN
ANET
AGIT
ASECVE
ABUD
AODE
ALOW
ADB
AN
ADPM
ASPA
ARABL
AFSN
AZ
AC
AIAG
AFSI
ASCE
ASIG
ACABQ
ADIP
AFGHANISTAN
AROC
ADCO
ACOTA
ANARCHISTS
AMEDCASCKFLO
AK
ARABBL
ASCH
ANTITERRORISM
AGRICULTURE
AOCR
ARR
ASSEMBLY
AORCYM
AFPK
ACKM
AGMT
AEC
APRC
AIN
AFPREL
ASFC
ASECTH
AFSA
AINR
AOPC
AFAF
AFARI
AX
ASECAF
ASECAFIN
AT
AFZAL
APCS
AGAO
AIT
ARCH
AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL
AMEX
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AORCD
AVIATION
ARAS
AINFCY
ACBAQ
AOPR
AREP
AOIC
ASEX
ASEK
AER
AGR
AMCT
AVERY
APR
AEMRS
AFU
AMG
ATPDEA
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AORL
ACS
AMCHAMS
AECL
AUC
ACAO
BA
BR
BB
BG
BEXP
BY
BRUSSELS
BU
BD
BTIO
BK
BL
BE
BMGT
BO
BM
BX
BN
BWC
BBSR
BTT
BC
BH
BILAT
BUSH
BHUM
BT
BTC
BMENA
BOND
BAIO
BP
BF
BRPA
BURNS
BUT
BBG
BCW
BOEHNER
BOL
BASHAR
BIDEN
BFIN
BZ
BEXPC
BTIU
CPAS
CA
CASC
CS
CBW
CIDA
CO
CODEL
CI
CROS
CU
CH
CWC
CMGT
CVIS
CDG
CTR
CG
CF
CHIEF
CJAN
CBSA
CE
CY
CB
CW
CM
CHR
CD
COE
CV
COUNTER
CT
CN
CPUOS
CTERR
CVR
CVPR
CDC
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CONS
COM
CACS
CR
CONTROLS
CAN
CACM
COMMERCE
CAMBODIA
CFIS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITES
CONDOLEEZZA
CZ
CTBT
CEN
CLINTON
CFED
CARC
CTM
CARICOM
CSW
CICTE
CYPRUS
CBE
CMGMT
CARSON
CWCM
CIVS
COUNTRYCLEARANCE
CENTCOM
CAPC
COPUOS
CKGR
CITEL
CQ
CITT
CIC
CARIB
CVIC
CAFTA
CVISU
CDB
CEDAW
CNC
CJUS
COMMAND
CENTER
COL
CAJC
CONSULAR
CLMT
CBC
CIA
CNARC
CIS
CEUDA
CHINA
CAC
CL
DR
DJ
DEMOCRATIC
DEMARCHE
DOMESTIC
DISENGAGEMENT
DB
DA
DHS
DAO
DCM
DAVID
DO
DEAX
DEFENSE
DEA
DTRO
DPRK
DOC
DTRA
DK
DAC
DOD
DRL
DRC
DCG
DE
DOT
DEPT
DOE
DS
DKEM
ECON
ETTC
EFIS
ETRD
EC
EMIN
EAGR
EAID
EFIN
EUN
ECIN
EG
EWWT
EINV
ENRG
ELAB
EPET
EIND
EN
EAIR
EUMEM
ECPS
ES
EI
ELTN
ET
EZ
EU
ER
EINT
ENGR
ECONOMIC
ENIV
EFTA
ETRN
EMS
EUREM
EPA
ESTH
EEB
EET
ENV
EAG
EXIM
ECTRD
ELNT
ENVIRONMENT
ECA
EAP
EINDIR
ETR
ECONOMY
ETRC
ELECTIONS
EICN
EXPORT
EARG
EGHG
EID
ETRO
EINF
EAIDHO
ECIP
EENV
EURM
EPEC
ERNG
ENERG
EIAD
EXBS
ED
EREL
ELAM
EK
EWT
ENGRD
EDEV
ECE
ENGY
EXIMOPIC
ETRDEC
ECCT
EUR
ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID
EFI
ECOSOC
EXTERNAL
ESCAP
ETCC
EENG
ERA
ENRD
ECLAC
ETRAD
EBRD
ENVR
ECONENRG
ELTNSNAR
ELAP
EPIT
EDUC
EAIDXMXAXBXFFR
EETC
EIVN
EDRC
EGOV
ETRA
EAIDRW
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ESA
ETRDGK
ENVI
ELN
EPRT
EPTED
ERTD
EUM
EAIDS
EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM
EDU
EV
EAIDAF
EDA
EPREL
EINVEFIN
EAGER
ETMIN
EUCOM
ECCP
EIDN
EINVKSCA
ENNP
EFINECONCS
ETC
EAIRASECCASCID
EINN
ETRP
ECONOMICS
ENERGY
EIAR
EINDETRD
ECONEFIN
EURN
ETRDEINVTINTCS
EFIM
ETIO
EATO
EIPR
EINVETC
ETTD
ETDR
EIQ
ECONCS
ENRGIZ
EAIG
ENTG
EUC
ERD
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECUN
FR
FI
FOREIGN
FARM
FIR
FAO
FK
FARC
FAS
FJ
FREEDOM
FAC
FINANCE
FBI
FTAA
FM
FCS
FAA
FORCE
FDA
FTA
FT
FCSC
FMGT
FINR
FIN
FDIC
FOR
FOI
FO
FMLN
FISO
GM
GERARD
GT
GA
GG
GR
GTIP
GH
GZ
GE
GB
GY
GAZA
GJ
GEORGE
GOI
GCC
GMUS
GI
GLOBAL
GV
GC
GL
GOV
GKGIC
GF
GWI
GIPNC
GUTIERREZ
GTMO
GANGS
GAERC
GUILLERMO
GASPAR
HR
HA
HYMPSK
HO
HK
HUMAN
HU
HN
HHS
HURI
HUD
HUMRIT
HUMANITARIAN
HUMANR
HL
HSTC
HILLARY
HCOPIL
HADLEY
HOURANI
HI
HUM
HEBRON
HUMOR
IZ
IN
IAEA
IS
IMO
ILO
IR
IC
IT
ITU
ID
IV
IMF
IBRD
IWC
ICAO
ICRC
INF
IO
IPR
ISO
IK
ISRAELI
IQ
ICES
IDB
INFLUENZA
IRAQI
ISCON
IGAD
IRAN
ITALY
IRAQ
ICTY
ICTR
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IQNV
IADB
INTERNAL
INMARSAT
IRDB
ILC
INCB
INRB
ICJ
ISRAEL
INR
IEA
ISPA
ICCAT
IOM
ITRD
IHO
IL
IFAD
ITRA
IDLI
ISCA
INL
INRA
INTELSAT
ISAF
ISPL
IRS
IEF
ITER
INDO
IIP
IND
IEFIN
IACI
IAHRC
INNP
IA
INTERPOL
IFIN
ISSUES
IZPREL
IRAJ
IF
ITPHUM
ITA
IP
IRPE
IDA
ISLAMISTS
ITF
INRO
IBET
IDP
IRC
KMDR
KPAO
KOMC
KNNP
KFLO
KDEM
KSUM
KIPR
KFLU
KE
KCRM
KJUS
KAWC
KZ
KSCA
KDRG
KCOR
KGHG
KPAL
KTIP
KMCA
KCRS
KPKO
KOLY
KRVC
KVPR
KG
KWBG
KTER
KS
KN
KSPR
KWMN
KV
KTFN
KFRD
KU
KSTC
KSTH
KISL
KGIC
KSEP
KFIN
KTEX
KTIA
KUNR
KCMR
KCIP
KMOC
KTDB
KBIO
KBCT
KMPI
KSAF
KACT
KFEM
KPRV
KPWR
KIRC
KCFE
KRIM
KHIV
KHLS
KVIR
KNNNP
KCEM
KLIG
KIRF
KNUP
KSAC
KNUC
KPGOV
KTDD
KIDE
KOMS
KLFU
KNNC
KMFO
KSEO
KJRE
KJUST
KMRS
KSRE
KGIT
KPIR
KPOA
KUWAIT
KIVP
KICC
KSCS
KPOL
KSEAO
KRCM
KSCI
KNAP
KGLB
KICA
KCUL
KPRM
KFSC
KQ
KPOP
KPFO
KPALAOIS
KREC
KBWG
KR
KTTB
KNAR
KCOM
KESS
KINR
KOCI
KWN
KCSY
KREL
KTBT
KFTN
KW
KRFD
KFLOA
KHDP
KNEP
KIND
KHUM
KSKN
KOMO
KDRL
KTFIN
KSOC
KPO
KGIV
KSTCPL
KSI
KPRP
KFPC
KNNB
KNDP
KICCPUR
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KDMR
KFCE
KIMMITT
KMCC
KMNP
KSEC
KOMCSG
KGCC
KRAD
KCRP
KAUST
KWAWC
KCHG
KRDP
KPAS
KTIAPARM
KPAOPREL
KWGB
KIRP
KMIG
KLAB
KSEI
KHSA
KNPP
KPAONZ
KWWW
KGHA
KY
KCRIM
KCRCM
KGCN
KPLS
KIIP
KPAOY
KTRD
KTAO
KJU
KBTS
KWAC
KFIU
KNNO
KPAI
KILS
KPA
KRCS
KWBGSY
KNPPIS
KNNPMNUC
KNPT
KERG
KLTN
KPREL
KTLA
KO
KAWK
KVRP
KAID
KX
KENV
KWCI
KNPR
KCFC
KNEI
KFTFN
KTFM
KCERS
KDEMAF
KMEPI
KEMS
KBTR
KEDU
KIRL
KNNR
KMPT
KPDD
KPIN
KDEV
KFRP
KTBD
KMSG
KWWMN
KWBC
KA
KOM
KWNM
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KRGY
KNNF
KICR
KIFR
KWMNCS
KPAK
KDDG
KCGC
KID
KNSD
KMPF
KWMM
MARR
MX
MASS
MOPS
MNUC
MCAP
MTCRE
MRCRE
MTRE
MASC
MY
MK
MG
MU
MILI
MO
MZ
MEPP
MCC
MEDIA
MOPPS
MI
MAS
MW
MP
MEPN
MV
MD
MR
MC
MCA
MT
MIL
MARITIME
MOPSGRPARM
MAAR
MOOPS
ML
MA
MN
MNUCPTEREZ
MTCR
MUNC
MPOS
MONUC
MGMT
MURRAY
MACP
MINUSTAH
MCCONNELL
MGT
MNUR
MF
MEPI
MOHAMMAD
MAR
MAPP
MNU
MFA
MTS
MLS
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MED
MNVC
MIK
MBM
MILITARY
MAPS
MARAD
MDC
MACEDONIA
MASSMNUC
MUCN
MQADHAFI
MPS
NZ
NATO
NI
NO
NU
NG
NL
NPT
NS
NA
NP
NASA
NSF
NEA
NANCY
NSG
NRR
NATIONAL
NMNUC
NC
NSC
NAS
NARC
NELSON
NATEU
NDP
NIH
NK
NIPP
NR
NERG
NSSP
NE
NTDB
NT
NEGROPONTE
NGO
NATOIRAQ
NAR
NZUS
NCCC
NH
NAFTA
NEW
NRG
NUIN
NOVO
NATOPREL
NV
NICHOLAS
NPA
NSFO
NW
NORAD
NPG
NOAA
OPRC
OPDC
OTRA
OECD
OVIP
OREP
ODC
OIIP
OAS
OSCE
OPIC
OMS
OFDP
OFDA
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OSCI
OM
OPAD
ODPC
OIC
ODIP
OPPI
ORA
OCEA
OREG
OMIG
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXP
OPEC
OFPD
OAU
OCII
OIL
OVIPPRELUNGANU
OSHA
OPCD
OPCR
OF
OFDPQIS
OSIC
OHUM
OTR
OBSP
OGAC
OESC
OVP
ON
OES
OTAR
OCS
PREL
PGOV
PARM
PINR
PHUM
PM
PREF
PTER
PK
PINS
PBIO
PHSA
PE
PBTS
PA
PL
POL
PAK
POV
POLITICS
POLICY
PO
PRELTBIOBA
PKO
PIN
PNAT
PU
PGOVPREL
PALESTINIAN
PTERPGOV
PELOSI
PAS
PP
PTEL
PROP
PRELAF
PRHUM
PRE
PUNE
PIRF
PVOV
PROG
PERSONS
PROV
PKK
PRGOV
PH
PLAB
PDEM
PCI
PRL
PRM
PINSO
PERM
PETR
PPAO
PERL
PBS
PETERS
PRELBR
PCON
POLITICAL
PMIL
POLM
PKPA
PNUM
PLO
PTERM
PJUS
PARMP
PNIR
PHUMKPAL
PG
PREZ
PGIC
PAO
PROTECTION
PRELPK
PGOVENRG
PATTY
PSOC
PARTIES
PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ
PMIG
PAIGH
PARK
PETER
PHUS
PKPO
PGOVECON
POUS
PMAR
PWBG
PAR
PGOVGM
PHUH
PTE
PY
POLUN
PDOV
PGOVSOCI
PGOVPM
PRELEVU
PGOR
PBTSRU
PHUMA
PHUMR
PPD
PGV
PRAM
PARMS
PINL
PSI
PKPAL
PPA
PTERE
PGOF
PINO
PREO
PHAS
PAC
PRESL
PORG
PS
PGVO
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PINT
PRELP
PREFA
PNG
PTBS
PFOR
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PREK
PHJM
POLINT
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PECON
PEACE
PROCESS
PLN
PEDRO
PF
PGPV
PCUL
PGGV
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGIV
PHUMPREL
POGOV
PEL
PBT
PAMQ
PINF
PSEPC
POSTS
PAHO
PHUMPGOV
PGOC
PNR
RS
RP
RU
RW
RFE
RCMP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
REFORM
RO
ROW
ROBERT
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RELATIONS
RAY
ROBERTG
RIGHTS
RM
RATIFICATION
RREL
RBI
RICE
ROOD
REL
RODHAM
RGY
RUEHZO
RELIGIOUS
RELFREE
RUEUN
RELAM
RSP
RF
REO
REGIONAL
RUPREL
RI
REMON
RPEL
RSO
SCUL
SENV
SOCI
SZ
SNAR
SO
SP
SU
SY
SI
SMIG
SYR
SA
SW
SF
SR
SYRIA
SNARM
START
SPECIALIST
SG
SNIG
SCI
SGWI
SE
SIPDIS
SANC
SELAB
SN
SETTLEMENTS
SCIENCE
SENVENV
SENS
SPCE
SPAS
SECURITY
SENC
SOCIETY
SOSI
SENVEAGREAIDTBIOECONSOCIXR
SEN
SPECI
ST
SL
SENVCASCEAIDID
SC
SECRETARY
STR
SNA
SOCIS
SADC
SEP
SK
SHUM
SYAI
SMIL
STEPHEN
SNRV
SKCA
SENSITIVE
SECI
SCUD
SCRM
SGNV
SECTOR
SAARC
SENVSXE
SWMN
STEINBERG
SOPN
SOCR
SCRS
SWE
SARS
SNARIZ
SUDAN
SENVQGR
SAN
SM
SFNV
SSA
SPCVIS
SOFA
SCULKPAOECONTU
SENVKGHG
SHI
SEVN
SH
SNARCS
SNARN
SIPRS
TBIO
TW
TRGY
TSPA
TU
TPHY
TI
TX
TH
TIP
TSPL
TNGD
TZ
TS
TC
TK
TURKEY
TERRORISM
TPSL
TINT
TRSY
TERFIN
TPP
TT
TECHNOLOGY
TE
TAGS
TRAFFICKING
TJ
TN
TO
TD
TP
TREATY
TR
TA
TIO
TECH
TF
TRAD
TNDG
TWI
TPSA
TWL
TAUSCHER
TRBY
TL
TV
THPY
TSPAM
TREL
TRT
TNAR
TFIN
TWCH
THOMMA
THOMAS
TERROR
TRY
TBID
UK
UNESCO
UNSC
UNGA
UN
US
UZ
USEU
UG
UP
UNAUS
UNMIK
USTR
UY
USUN
UNEP
UNDC
UV
UNPUOS
UNSCR
USAID
UNODC
UNRCR
UNHCR
UNDP
UNCRIME
UA
UNHRC
UNRWA
UNO
UNCND
UNCHR
USAU
UNICEF
USPS
UNOMIG
UNESCOSCULPRELPHUMKPALCUIRXFVEKV
UR
UNFICYP
UNCITRAL
UNAMA
UNVIE
USTDA
USNC
UNCSD
USCC
UNEF
UNGAPL
USSC
UNMIC
UNTAC
UNCLASSIFIED
USDA
UNCTAD
USGS
UNFPA
UNSE
USOAS
UE
UAE
UNCHS
UNDESCO
UNC
UNSCS
UKXG
UNGACG
UNHR
UNBRO
UNCHC
UNFCYP
UNIDROIT
WHTI
WIPO
WTRO
WHO
WTO
WMO
WFP
WEET
WS
WE
WA
WHA
WBG
WILLIAM
WI
WSIS
WCL
WEBZ
WZ
WW
WWBG
WMD
WWT
WMN
WWARD
WITH
WTRQ
WCO
WEU
WB
WBEG
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09BEIJING601, SAO DELAYS LOSE SALES AND COST AMERICAN JOBS FOR U.S.
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09BEIJING601.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09BEIJING601 | 2009-03-09 09:24 | 2011-08-23 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Beijing |
VZCZCXRO3734
PP RUEHCN RUEHGH RUEHVC
DE RUEHBJ #0601/01 0680924
ZNR UUUUU ZZH CONS POL
P 090924Z MAR 09
FM AMEMBASSY BEIJING
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 2760
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHDC PRIORITY
RULSDMK/DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHDC PRIORITY
RHMFIUU/DEPT OF ENERGY WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY
INFO RUEHOO/CHINA POSTS COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RHMCSUU/FBI WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RHMFIUU/FAA NATIONAL HQ WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW PRIORITY 9224
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO PRIORITY 2421
RUEHNE/AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI PRIORITY 4745
RUEHTV/AMEMBASSY TEL AVIV PRIORITY 2125
RUEHLN/AMCONSUL ST PETERSBURG PRIORITY 0015
RUEHCI/AMCONSUL KOLKATA PRIORITY 0031
RUEHCG/AMCONSUL CHENNAI PRIORITY 0229
RUEHBI/AMCONSUL MUMBAI PRIORITY 0118
RUEHJM/AMCONSUL JERUSALEM PRIORITY 0695
ECON
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 06 BEIJING 000601
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
STATE FOR CA/P; CA/VO/L/C; EAP/CM; EEB/CBA; EEB/ESC; ISN/CB; L; M;
OES
STATE PASS USTR FOR STRATFORD
CIA FOR DCI FROM CHARGE D'AFFAIRES
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: CMGT CVIS OEXC ECON EAIR CH
SUBJECT: SAO DELAYS LOSE SALES AND COST AMERICAN JOBS FOR U.S.
AVIATION COMPANIES
REF: (A) BEIJING 435,
(B) BEIJING 174, 08 BEIJING 3055, 08 SHANGHAI 133
(C) BEIJING 130
(D) 08 BEIJING 3116
(E) STATE 7490
(F) STATE 20889
BEIJING 00000601 001.2 OF 006
This cable is Sensitive but Unclassified (SBU) and for official use
only. Not for transmission outside USG channels. Not for internet
distribution.
¶1. (SBU) SUMMARY. U.S. aviation companies point to current SAO
processing times of 16 weeks or longer as an unreasonable threat to
U.S. exports, U.S. jobs, and the chances of recovery for their
communities in the U.S. The industry has grown remarkably over the
past 5 years in China, and has successfully organized to engage
local customers, officials and business partners. But it cannot
anticipate visa application requests four months in advance, even
with its longest sales cycles. SAO delays, caused by insufficient
staffing at at least one clearing agency, prevent U.S. firms from
reselling cancelled aircraft orders to eager Chinese buyers, and
limit their ability to mitigate the impacts of the global economic
crisis on their business, and create opportunities for foreign
aviation competitors, including especially Airbus. At the current
16 weeks of longer, SAO delays will also hinder cooperation with
Chinese suppliers, and could lead to global delays of key aircraft.
As SAO delays and the global economic crisis grew in 2008, U.S.
aviation exports to China fell by USD 2 billion. The current state
of affairs has led this flagship U.S. industry to seriously question
the responsiveness of their own government to American business
needs. While the business community will welcome the change in SAO
Mantis validities for Chinese nationals announced on March 5 (reftel
F), they will continue to face inordinate processing delays until
additional personnel are added by at least one clearing agency to
resolve the backlog. END SUMMARY.
AVIATION EXPORTS GROW RAPIDLY; U.S. COMPANIES ENGAGED
--------------------------------------------- --------
¶2. (SBU) In 2008, U.S. aviation exports to China totaled USD 5.1
billion, down from their 2007 peak of USD 7.1 billion in 2007, but
more than double the value in 2004. (NOTE: Aviation exports
defined as U.S. domestic exports of HTS code 88 - aircraft,
spacecraft, and parts thereof.) In spite of the decline in 2009,
since 2004 aviation exports grew at a compound annual growth rate of
27 percent, exceeding the 20 percent growth rate of overall exports
to China. Moreover, the U.S. runs a large trade surplus with China
in aviation, reaching USD 4.9 billion in 2008 after peaking at USD
7.0 billion the previous year. While market access issues remain,
aviation has clearly been a sector where the Chinese recognize the
U.S. comparative and technical advantage and value U.S. products
highly.
U.S. AVIATION TRADE WITH CHINA
------------------------------
Units: USD mil. 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
U.S. EXPORTS 1,948 4,339 6,047 7,160 5,079
U.S. IMPORTS 80 85 134 192 192
U.S. SURPLUS 1,868 4,254 5,913 6,968 4,887
SOURCE: USITC. Domestic exports at FAS value, imports for
consumption at customs value. Statistic for harmonized tariff code
88: aircraft, spacecraft and parts thereof.
JOBS IN FIFTY STATES
BEIJING 00000601 002.2 OF 006
--------------------
¶3. (SBU) U.S. companies in China are well organized through the
Aviation Cooperation Program (ACP) of the American Chamber of
Commerce (AmCham), which is partially funded by a US Trade
Development Agency (USTDA) grant. U.S. companies' activity in China
goes far beyond the big names of Boeing, United Technologies, and
General Electric. It includes general aviation manufacturers
Textron (Cessna and Bell Helicopter), Hawker-Beechcraft, and Cirrus;
systems and avionics manufacturers Honeywell, Rockwell Collins,
Hamilton Sundstrand, Parker Aerospace and Moog; air traffic control
systems vendor Telephonics; and airport design companies Leo A. Daly
and HOK; as well as major U.S. airlines. Since 2005, ACP's
Executive Management Development Training (EMDT) program has sent
nearly 100 trainees from the Civil Aviation Authority of China
(CAAC) to the U.S. to learn about the U.S. aviation industry. The
result is a very broad-based and close relationship with Chinese
regulators, airlines, and local aviation companies, helping to keep
the door to China's burgeoning aviation market open. But SAO delays
of 16 weeks or more have begun to undermine the good work the
industry has done in cultivating relationships in China. It is not
exaggeration to say jobs are created or lost in all fifty states
depending on the health of this important industry. The following
examples illustrate firsthand the problems SAO delay pose for their
business.
BIG BURDEN ON BOEING'S BUSINESS
-------------------------------
¶4. (SBU) Boeing Commercial Airplanes Group was recently forced to
delay a 777 freighter delivery to China due to an SAO delay,
resulting in delayed revenue in the range of USD 250 million (list
price). The 777 was to be delivered in mid-February 2009, but
required an inspection by CAAC Airworthiness Division. The CAAC
airworthiness inspection team leader applied for his U.S. visa on
Oct. 20, 2008. His application was tagged for SAO concerns and he
was requested to provide additional information, which he did on
Oct. 27. Boeing checked on the status six weeks later on Jan. 9,
2009, but was told that SAO administrative processing was taking
eight to ten weeks. With only a few weeks till inspection, and
unable to clarify when the inspector's visa would be approved,
Boeing was forced to postpone inspection and delivery, which will
likely push revenue into the following quarter. Even America's
largest aircraft manufacturer had not anticipated the selection of a
CAAC airworthiness inspector for SAO concerns, nor such a long
delay.
¶5. (SBU) Boeing has a National Development and Reform Commission
(NDRC) delegation slated for travel in April 2009, which will work
on implementation of an MOU with Boeing on aviation safety and
efficiency. The Embassy will need to request expedited SAO
processing since key members of the mission from NDRC and CAAC are
those who actually approve vendor selection by Chinese airlines and
will help determine the sale of up to 150 aircraft valued at USD 10
billion. Given the group's composition, with leading officials from
a wide range of agencies, it is not practically possible to arrange
their travel 16 weeks or more in advance. To do so would have
required they begin the application process nearly one-half year
ago. Chinese government officials have their own procedures for
official travel. One aviation contact asks, "How easy would it be
for a U.S. Government official to gain approval and process their
travel more than four months in advance?"
THE LIMITS OF TOLERANCE
-----------------------
BEIJING 00000601 003.2 OF 006
¶6. (SBU) According to Kenneth Yata of Boeing China, "A four month
lead time is simply unacceptable for our customers and suppliers.
At some point, they will simply say 'enough is enough, we can do
business with the Europeans, Canadians, Israelis and Russians.' In
the early 1990s, Boeing had a 90 percent market share in China,
versus 5 percent for Airbus. Today, Airbus is up to 30 percent,
Boeing down to 50 percent, and other vendors such as Bombardier have
entered. We want to partner with Chinese companies, but SAO
processing times are making the return disproportionate to their
efforts to work with us." Yata is appreciative of the Embassy's
efforts to expedite SAO processing, but fears the lengthening
approval process has jeopardized so much travel that neither Boeing
nor the Embassy can reliably expedite so many travelers.
UNITED TECHNOLOGIES FIGHTS AN UPHILL BATTLE
-------------------------------------------
¶7. (SBU) United Technologies Corporation (UTC) is a large American
aviation conglomerate, which includes Sikorsky (helicopters)
Schweizer (small aircraft), Pratt and Whitney (engines) and Hamilton
Sundstrand (aerospace systems). UTC sales in China and Hong Kong
were USD 2.7 billion in 2008, while exports from the U.S. to China
were USD 223 million. The company has been frustrated by SAO
delays, and has done its best to learn how to work within the
process. But Jim Gradoville, President of UTC's China Division,
observes that lengthening of SAO processing times over the past year
to more than 16 weeks is making it harder and harder to do business.
¶8. (SBU) In 2008, the Deputy General Manager of a UTC Sikorsky
helicopter joint-venture applied for a visa one month before a
critical supplier conference. His application was tagged for SAO
processing, and he did not get the visa until six weeks later and
was unable to attend the event. UTC training for CAAC staff at
Sikorsky and Schweizer was also cancelled in 2008 due to the group's
inability to receive their SAO clearance on time. The schedule had
not been easy to coordinate with the Sikorsky facility and FAA.
Sikorsky was forced to postpone dates for its suppliers' conference
four times in 2008 while it waited for Changhe Aircraft employees
SAOs to be approved. Ordinarily, the company would have moved ahead
as scheduled, but Changhe has become too important a supplier and
Sikorsky feared excluding them would harm their business
relationship.
¶9. (SBU) Sikorsky's first Chinese customer for a S-76 VVIP
helicopter applied in advance to take delivery of the aircraft in
November 2008. UTC had applied in advance, taking possible SAO
processing of three weeks into account, and the buyer's wife and his
company's aviation manager were indeed identified for SAO
processing. Unfortunately, processing time had grown to 6 weeks,
which made it impossible to travel according to schedule, which
delayed delivery. A French competitor has told this customer that
the Americans are just too difficult to deal with. Sikorsky knows
the customer wants to buy a second helicopter of this class, but
fears the SAO processing issue could tip the purchase to their
European competitor.
GIVING UP ON SALES TO CHINA?
----------------------------
¶10. (SBU) As-with many U.S. aviation companies, UTC has a broad
range of relationships with Aviation Industry Corporation of China
(AVIC). Since UTC knows that AVIC employees are likely SAO targets,
they generally no longer include them in any activities with less
than a three month lead time. This affects the company's planning
which would benefit from AVIC's participation, and hurts the
BEIJING 00000601 004.2 OF 006
company's relationships and competitiveness against European and
Russian vendors. Customers are well aware of the SAO hurdle, and
even if they are sold on a particular aircraft, many fear their
employees will not be able to attend essential training if they buy
a U.S. manufactured product.
SAOS THREATEN HOPES FOR SMALL AIRCRAFT VENDORS
--------------------------------------------- -
¶11. (SBU) While China's commercial aviation market has been growing
rapidly, air space control and regulation have hampered the growth
of the general aviation (private airplane) sector. With the
Wenchuan Earthquake in May 2007, China's leadership and aviation
regulators became acutely aware of the deficiency in China's small
aircraft fleet. China had virtually no heavy-load helicopters to
assist relief efforts in remote communities in Sichuan Province.
Since that time, China has begun to consider accelerated purchases
of helicopters. Moreover, it is also considering opening airspace
control and regulation to allow development of a general aviation
sector which could assist with disaster relief in a national
emergency. This potential regulatory change is expected to create a
wave of new business opportunities for U.S. small airplane and
helicopter companies, from Wichita to Wisconsin.
¶12. (SBU) U.S. company Hawker-Beechcraft is a case in point. The
company recently opened a Beijing sales office to support its
growing China business. With over ten different small airplane
models, the company has been introducing its range of aircraft to
China through small sales, often for flight training applications.
They are averaging eight to ten sales per year, valued at roughly
USD 10 million per deal. Currently the number of airplanes is
small, but Regional Sales Director Matthew Liu says the potential
market for private aircraft is huge, and the Chinese have the money
to buy. While corporate jet business is facing cancellations in the
U.S., the China market continues to grow. Hawker-Beechcraft even
sees the opportunity to recover cancelled orders in the U.S., by
selling these aircraft in China.
¶13. (SBU) However, as Hawker-Beechcraft builds its business, each
new aircraft type requires certification by the Civil Aviation
Authority of China (CAAC). Hawker's sales cycle is typically six
months from order to delivery, but it has the chance to sell some of
its cancelled orders on an even tighter schedule of three to four
months. Unfortunately, such sales cycles do not offer much
opportunity to factor in a 12 to 16 week possible SAO processing
time, and SAOs could likely scuttle many of these deals. Hawker is
waiting for the visa application results for a CAAC team seeking to
inspect a new aircraft delivery to Shenzhen Airlines. If, as in
other cases, the inspector's application is submitted for an SAO, a
16 week delay for will dramatically postpone any delivery.
LONG WAIT TRANSLATES TO ANTI-AMERICAN SENTIMENT
--------------------------------------------- --
¶14. (SBU) According to AmCham ACP Executive Director Joseph
Tymczyszyn, even when an SAO is finally cleared, the delays caused
by the processing can contribute to anti-American sentiment among
key Chinese officials. In 2002-03, a CAAC Air Traffic Management
Bureau (ATMB) official was delayed due to SAO. The busy official
made several attempts to reschedule, but after more than 6 months,
the process was never concluded. The official withdrew the
application in disgust, and stated she would rather work with the
Europeans and Japanese. The official did eventually reapply in
2004-05, when the application was delayed for an SAO but ultimately
approved in time for her trip. Unfortunately, other members of her
delegation were not cleared in time, and the trip had to be
BEIJING 00000601 005.2 OF 006
postponed.
¶15. (SBU) Since those experiences, the official has been promoted
within ATMB, where she is a Deputy Director General (DDG) in charge
of new technology and purchasing air traffic control (ATC) equipment
for all of China. Her office also determines ATC standards. U.S.
ATC vendor Telephonics initially had a good position with airports
in southern and central China. But acquisitions in the past several
years, including upgrades at China's three largest commercial
airports, have been given to a French vendor. ATMB also approves
landing slots for U.S. airlines at China's airports, and timing of
arrivals and departures can greatly impact an airlines success. It
doesn't help to have key officials predisposed to dislike the U.S.
HUNDREDS OF TRAVELERS MUST ABANDON TRAVEL
-----------------------------------------
¶16. (SBU) Beijing Consular Section estimates SAO processing
currently takes 16 weeks or longer. Since October 1, 2008, Beijing
has turned away more than 615 business travelers with inflexible
dates of travel at the time of their interview due to SAO delay,
including nearly 200 in the past 30 days. During the month of
February 2009, the NIV section turned away 25 percent of all B1/B2
business travelers with a technology background and SAO requests
were never sent. (NOTE: Additional reporting on SAO processing
statistics and its impact on travel to the U.S. will follow in
septel.)
AVIATION COMPANIES WANT TO BE GOOD CORPORATE CITIZENS
--------------------------------------------- --------
¶17. (SBU) U.S. aviation companies have been cooperative with the
Embassy and work hard to cooperate with visa and SAO requirements.
Many are active in the American Chamber of Commerce referral
program, and do their best to stay up to date on changes in
procedures and processing times. But even in the best of
circumstances the nature of their business does not allow them to
have customers, government officials and business partners begin
preparations for travel to the U.S. five or more months in advance
to overcome a four month SAO process. Worse yet, in turbulent
economic times growth in China offers them a chance to mitigate the
downturn in other markets, helping them to the maintain production
and jobs in the U.S. Inordinately long SAO delays hinder their
flexibility to make such deals. The current state of affairs makes
them question the responsiveness of their own government to American
business needs.
AVIATION INDUSTRY SUGGESTS IMPROVEMENTS
---------------------------------------
¶18. (SBU) U.S. aviation companies deeply understand USG concerns
about technology transfer. The competitive nature of their industry
and China's own efforts to build commercial aircraft means they deal
with it every day. But they have two practical suggestions for the
SAO process which they believe would allow them to continue their
cooperation, while still building a healthy business.
(1) Create a special program for key Chinese government and aviation
industry officials, executives, procurement or technical
representatives who could be pre-approved for travel in advance.
The Aviation Cooperation Program from AmCham could help prepare a
list of 200-300 key officials, and subject it to annual review.
(2) When the SAO backlog is current, work with U.S. aviation
companies and AmCham to get the message out to their customers,
government contacts and business partners in order to counter the
angst which has accumulated.
BEIJING 00000601 006.2 OF 006
¶19. COMMENT. Embassy Beijing welcomes the change in SAO Mantis
validities for Chinese nationals announced by the Department on
March 5 (reftel F). This new policy will allow visas to be issued
for a full year with multiple entry. Our Consular Section has
already begun to inform key U.S. business contacts of the change.
While we anticipate aviation vendors will also welcome the
announcement, these companies still face a four month processing
time for pending visas until clearing agencies devote sufficient
resources to eliminate the current backlog and stay current going
forward. END COMMENT.
PICCUTA