

Currently released so far... 51122 / 251,287
Articles
Brazil
Sri Lanka
United Kingdom
Sweden
00. Editorial
United States
Latin America
Egypt
Jordan
Yemen
Thailand
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
2011/05/18
2011/05/19
2011/05/20
2011/05/21
2011/05/22
2011/05/23
2011/05/24
2011/05/25
2011/05/26
2011/05/27
2011/05/28
2011/05/29
2011/05/30
2011/05/31
2011/06/01
2011/06/02
2011/06/03
2011/06/04
2011/06/05
2011/06/06
2011/06/07
2011/06/08
2011/06/09
2011/06/10
2011/06/11
2011/06/12
2011/06/13
2011/06/14
2011/06/15
2011/06/16
2011/06/17
2011/06/18
2011/06/19
2011/06/20
2011/06/21
2011/06/22
2011/06/23
2011/06/24
2011/06/25
2011/06/26
2011/06/27
2011/06/28
2011/06/29
2011/06/30
2011/07/01
2011/07/02
2011/07/04
2011/07/05
2011/07/06
2011/07/07
2011/07/08
2011/07/10
2011/07/11
2011/07/12
2011/07/13
2011/07/14
2011/07/15
2011/07/16
2011/07/17
2011/07/18
2011/07/19
2011/07/20
2011/07/21
2011/07/22
2011/07/23
2011/07/25
2011/07/27
2011/07/28
2011/07/29
2011/07/31
2011/08/01
2011/08/02
2011/08/03
2011/08/05
2011/08/06
2011/08/07
2011/08/08
2011/08/09
2011/08/10
2011/08/11
2011/08/12
2011/08/13
2011/08/15
2011/08/16
2011/08/17
2011/08/18
2011/08/19
2011/08/21
2011/08/22
2011/08/23
2011/08/24
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Antananarivo
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Alexandria
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embasy Bonn
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Brazzaville
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangui
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Belfast
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Cotonou
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chiang Mai
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Chengdu
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
DIR FSINFATC
Consulate Dusseldorf
Consulate Durban
Consulate Dubai
Consulate Dhahran
Embassy Guatemala
Embassy Grenada
Embassy Georgetown
Embassy Gaborone
Consulate Guayaquil
Consulate Guangzhou
Consulate Guadalajara
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Hong Kong
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kolonia
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Krakow
Consulate Kolkata
Consulate Karachi
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Lusaka
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Lome
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy Libreville
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Leipzig
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Mission Geneva
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Mogadishu
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maseru
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Merida
Consulate Melbourne
Consulate Matamoros
Consulate Marseille
Embassy Nouakchott
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Nuevo Laredo
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Consulate Nagoya
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Praia
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Moresby
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Podgorica
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Hillah
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Surabaya
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy Tirana
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
Consulate Thessaloniki
USUN New York
USMISSION USTR GENEVA
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Mission CD Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
UN Rome
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vientiane
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AMGT
ASEC
AEMR
AR
APECO
AU
AORC
ADANA
AJ
AF
AFIN
AMED
AS
AM
ABLD
AFFAIRS
AMB
APER
ACOA
AND
AA
AE
AADP
AID
AO
AL
AG
AORD
ADM
AINF
AINT
ASEAN
AORG
ABT
APEC
AY
ASUP
ARF
AGOA
AVIAN
ATRN
ANET
AGIT
ASECVE
ABUD
AODE
ALOW
ADB
AN
ADPM
ASPA
ARABL
AFSN
AZ
AC
AIAG
AFSI
ASCE
ASIG
ACABQ
ADIP
AFGHANISTAN
AROC
ADCO
ACOTA
ANARCHISTS
AMEDCASCKFLO
AK
ARABBL
ASCH
ANTITERRORISM
AGRICULTURE
AOCR
ARR
ASSEMBLY
AORCYM
AFPK
ACKM
AGMT
AEC
APRC
AIN
AFPREL
ASFC
ASECTH
AFSA
AINR
AOPC
AFAF
AFARI
AX
ASECAF
ASECAFIN
AT
AFZAL
APCS
AGAO
AIT
ARCH
AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL
AMEX
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AORCD
AVIATION
ARAS
AINFCY
ACBAQ
AOPR
AREP
AOIC
ASEX
ASEK
AER
AGR
AMCT
AVERY
APR
AEMRS
AFU
AMG
ATPDEA
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AORL
ACS
AMCHAMS
AECL
AUC
ACAO
BA
BR
BB
BG
BEXP
BY
BRUSSELS
BU
BD
BTIO
BK
BL
BE
BMGT
BO
BM
BX
BN
BWC
BBSR
BTT
BC
BH
BILAT
BUSH
BHUM
BT
BTC
BMENA
BOND
BAIO
BP
BF
BRPA
BURNS
BUT
BBG
BCW
BOEHNER
BOL
BASHAR
BIDEN
BFIN
BZ
BEXPC
BTIU
CPAS
CA
CASC
CS
CBW
CIDA
CO
CODEL
CI
CROS
CU
CH
CWC
CMGT
CVIS
CDG
CTR
CG
CF
CHIEF
CJAN
CBSA
CE
CY
CB
CW
CM
CHR
CD
COE
CV
COUNTER
CT
CN
CPUOS
CTERR
CVR
CVPR
CDC
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CONS
COM
CACS
CR
CONTROLS
CAN
CACM
COMMERCE
CAMBODIA
CFIS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITES
CONDOLEEZZA
CZ
CTBT
CEN
CLINTON
CFED
CARC
CTM
CARICOM
CSW
CICTE
CYPRUS
CBE
CMGMT
CARSON
CWCM
CIVS
COUNTRYCLEARANCE
CENTCOM
CAPC
COPUOS
CKGR
CITEL
CQ
CITT
CIC
CARIB
CVIC
CAFTA
CVISU
CDB
CEDAW
CNC
CJUS
COMMAND
CENTER
COL
CAJC
CONSULAR
CLMT
CBC
CIA
CNARC
CIS
CEUDA
CHINA
CAC
CL
DR
DJ
DEMOCRATIC
DEMARCHE
DOMESTIC
DISENGAGEMENT
DB
DA
DHS
DAO
DCM
DAVID
DO
DEAX
DEFENSE
DEA
DTRO
DPRK
DOC
DTRA
DK
DAC
DOD
DRL
DRC
DCG
DE
DOT
DEPT
DOE
DS
DKEM
ECON
ETTC
EFIS
ETRD
EC
EMIN
EAGR
EAID
EFIN
EUN
ECIN
EG
EWWT
EINV
ENRG
ELAB
EPET
EIND
EN
EAIR
EUMEM
ECPS
ES
EI
ELTN
ET
EZ
EU
ER
EINT
ENGR
ECONOMIC
ENIV
EFTA
ETRN
EMS
EUREM
EPA
ESTH
EEB
EET
ENV
EAG
EXIM
ECTRD
ELNT
ENVIRONMENT
ECA
EAP
EINDIR
ETR
ECONOMY
ETRC
ELECTIONS
EICN
EXPORT
EARG
EGHG
EID
ETRO
EINF
EAIDHO
ECIP
EENV
EURM
EPEC
ERNG
ENERG
EIAD
EXBS
ED
EREL
ELAM
EK
EWT
ENGRD
EDEV
ECE
ENGY
EXIMOPIC
ETRDEC
ECCT
EUR
ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID
EFI
ECOSOC
EXTERNAL
ESCAP
ETCC
EENG
ERA
ENRD
ECLAC
ETRAD
EBRD
ENVR
ECONENRG
ELTNSNAR
ELAP
EPIT
EDUC
EAIDXMXAXBXFFR
EETC
EIVN
EDRC
EGOV
ETRA
EAIDRW
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ESA
ETRDGK
ENVI
ELN
EPRT
EPTED
ERTD
EUM
EAIDS
EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM
EDU
EV
EAIDAF
EDA
EPREL
EINVEFIN
EAGER
ETMIN
EUCOM
ECCP
EIDN
EINVKSCA
ENNP
EFINECONCS
ETC
EAIRASECCASCID
EINN
ETRP
ECONOMICS
ENERGY
EIAR
EINDETRD
ECONEFIN
EURN
ETRDEINVTINTCS
EFIM
ETIO
EATO
EIPR
EINVETC
ETTD
ETDR
EIQ
ECONCS
ENRGIZ
EAIG
ENTG
EUC
ERD
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECUN
FR
FI
FOREIGN
FARM
FIR
FAO
FK
FARC
FAS
FJ
FREEDOM
FAC
FINANCE
FBI
FTAA
FM
FCS
FAA
FORCE
FDA
FTA
FT
FCSC
FMGT
FINR
FIN
FDIC
FOR
FOI
FO
FMLN
FISO
GM
GERARD
GT
GA
GG
GR
GTIP
GH
GZ
GE
GB
GY
GAZA
GJ
GEORGE
GOI
GCC
GMUS
GI
GLOBAL
GV
GC
GL
GOV
GKGIC
GF
GWI
GIPNC
GUTIERREZ
GTMO
GANGS
GAERC
GUILLERMO
GASPAR
HR
HA
HYMPSK
HO
HK
HUMAN
HU
HN
HHS
HURI
HUD
HUMRIT
HUMANITARIAN
HUMANR
HL
HSTC
HILLARY
HCOPIL
HADLEY
HOURANI
HI
HUM
HEBRON
HUMOR
IZ
IN
IAEA
IS
IMO
ILO
IR
IC
IT
ITU
ID
IV
IMF
IBRD
IWC
ICAO
ICRC
INF
IO
IPR
ISO
IK
ISRAELI
IQ
ICES
IDB
INFLUENZA
IRAQI
ISCON
IGAD
IRAN
ITALY
IRAQ
ICTY
ICTR
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IQNV
IADB
INTERNAL
INMARSAT
IRDB
ILC
INCB
INRB
ICJ
ISRAEL
INR
IEA
ISPA
ICCAT
IOM
ITRD
IHO
IL
IFAD
ITRA
IDLI
ISCA
INL
INRA
INTELSAT
ISAF
ISPL
IRS
IEF
ITER
INDO
IIP
IND
IEFIN
IACI
IAHRC
INNP
IA
INTERPOL
IFIN
ISSUES
IZPREL
IRAJ
IF
ITPHUM
ITA
IP
IRPE
IDA
ISLAMISTS
ITF
INRO
IBET
IDP
IRC
KMDR
KPAO
KOMC
KNNP
KFLO
KDEM
KSUM
KIPR
KFLU
KE
KCRM
KJUS
KAWC
KZ
KSCA
KDRG
KCOR
KGHG
KPAL
KTIP
KMCA
KCRS
KPKO
KOLY
KRVC
KVPR
KG
KWBG
KTER
KS
KN
KSPR
KWMN
KV
KTFN
KFRD
KU
KSTC
KSTH
KISL
KGIC
KSEP
KFIN
KTEX
KTIA
KUNR
KCMR
KCIP
KMOC
KTDB
KBIO
KBCT
KMPI
KSAF
KACT
KFEM
KPRV
KPWR
KIRC
KCFE
KRIM
KHIV
KHLS
KVIR
KNNNP
KCEM
KLIG
KIRF
KNUP
KSAC
KNUC
KPGOV
KTDD
KIDE
KOMS
KLFU
KNNC
KMFO
KSEO
KJRE
KJUST
KMRS
KSRE
KGIT
KPIR
KPOA
KUWAIT
KIVP
KICC
KSCS
KPOL
KSEAO
KRCM
KSCI
KNAP
KGLB
KICA
KCUL
KPRM
KFSC
KQ
KPOP
KPFO
KPALAOIS
KREC
KBWG
KR
KTTB
KNAR
KCOM
KESS
KINR
KOCI
KWN
KCSY
KREL
KTBT
KFTN
KW
KRFD
KFLOA
KHDP
KNEP
KIND
KHUM
KSKN
KOMO
KDRL
KTFIN
KSOC
KPO
KGIV
KSTCPL
KSI
KPRP
KFPC
KNNB
KNDP
KICCPUR
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KDMR
KFCE
KIMMITT
KMCC
KMNP
KSEC
KOMCSG
KGCC
KRAD
KCRP
KAUST
KWAWC
KCHG
KRDP
KPAS
KTIAPARM
KPAOPREL
KWGB
KIRP
KMIG
KLAB
KSEI
KHSA
KNPP
KPAONZ
KWWW
KGHA
KY
KCRIM
KCRCM
KGCN
KPLS
KIIP
KPAOY
KTRD
KTAO
KJU
KBTS
KWAC
KFIU
KNNO
KPAI
KILS
KPA
KRCS
KWBGSY
KNPPIS
KNNPMNUC
KNPT
KERG
KLTN
KPREL
KTLA
KO
KAWK
KVRP
KAID
KX
KENV
KWCI
KNPR
KCFC
KNEI
KFTFN
KTFM
KCERS
KDEMAF
KMEPI
KEMS
KBTR
KEDU
KIRL
KNNR
KMPT
KPDD
KPIN
KDEV
KFRP
KTBD
KMSG
KWWMN
KWBC
KA
KOM
KWNM
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KRGY
KNNF
KICR
KIFR
KWMNCS
KPAK
KDDG
KCGC
KID
KNSD
KMPF
KWMM
MARR
MX
MASS
MOPS
MNUC
MCAP
MTCRE
MRCRE
MTRE
MASC
MY
MK
MG
MU
MILI
MO
MZ
MEPP
MCC
MEDIA
MOPPS
MI
MAS
MW
MP
MEPN
MV
MD
MR
MC
MCA
MT
MIL
MARITIME
MOPSGRPARM
MAAR
MOOPS
ML
MA
MN
MNUCPTEREZ
MTCR
MUNC
MPOS
MONUC
MGMT
MURRAY
MACP
MINUSTAH
MCCONNELL
MGT
MNUR
MF
MEPI
MOHAMMAD
MAR
MAPP
MNU
MFA
MTS
MLS
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MED
MNVC
MIK
MBM
MILITARY
MAPS
MARAD
MDC
MACEDONIA
MASSMNUC
MUCN
MQADHAFI
MPS
NZ
NATO
NI
NO
NU
NG
NL
NPT
NS
NA
NP
NASA
NSF
NEA
NANCY
NSG
NRR
NATIONAL
NMNUC
NC
NSC
NAS
NARC
NELSON
NATEU
NDP
NIH
NK
NIPP
NR
NERG
NSSP
NE
NTDB
NT
NEGROPONTE
NGO
NATOIRAQ
NAR
NZUS
NCCC
NH
NAFTA
NEW
NRG
NUIN
NOVO
NATOPREL
NV
NICHOLAS
NPA
NSFO
NW
NORAD
NPG
NOAA
OPRC
OPDC
OTRA
OECD
OVIP
OREP
ODC
OIIP
OAS
OSCE
OPIC
OMS
OFDP
OFDA
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OSCI
OM
OPAD
ODPC
OIC
ODIP
OPPI
ORA
OCEA
OREG
OMIG
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXP
OPEC
OFPD
OAU
OCII
OIL
OVIPPRELUNGANU
OSHA
OPCD
OPCR
OF
OFDPQIS
OSIC
OHUM
OTR
OBSP
OGAC
OESC
OVP
ON
OES
OTAR
OCS
PREL
PGOV
PARM
PINR
PHUM
PM
PREF
PTER
PK
PINS
PBIO
PHSA
PE
PBTS
PA
PL
POL
PAK
POV
POLITICS
POLICY
PO
PRELTBIOBA
PKO
PIN
PNAT
PU
PGOVPREL
PALESTINIAN
PTERPGOV
PELOSI
PAS
PP
PTEL
PROP
PRELAF
PRHUM
PRE
PUNE
PIRF
PVOV
PROG
PERSONS
PROV
PKK
PRGOV
PH
PLAB
PDEM
PCI
PRL
PRM
PINSO
PERM
PETR
PPAO
PERL
PBS
PETERS
PRELBR
PCON
POLITICAL
PMIL
POLM
PKPA
PNUM
PLO
PTERM
PJUS
PARMP
PNIR
PHUMKPAL
PG
PREZ
PGIC
PAO
PROTECTION
PRELPK
PGOVENRG
PATTY
PSOC
PARTIES
PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ
PMIG
PAIGH
PARK
PETER
PHUS
PKPO
PGOVECON
POUS
PMAR
PWBG
PAR
PGOVGM
PHUH
PTE
PY
POLUN
PDOV
PGOVSOCI
PGOVPM
PRELEVU
PGOR
PBTSRU
PHUMA
PHUMR
PPD
PGV
PRAM
PARMS
PINL
PSI
PKPAL
PPA
PTERE
PGOF
PINO
PREO
PHAS
PAC
PRESL
PORG
PS
PGVO
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PINT
PRELP
PREFA
PNG
PTBS
PFOR
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PREK
PHJM
POLINT
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PECON
PEACE
PROCESS
PLN
PEDRO
PF
PGPV
PCUL
PGGV
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGIV
PHUMPREL
POGOV
PEL
PBT
PAMQ
PINF
PSEPC
POSTS
PAHO
PHUMPGOV
PGOC
PNR
RS
RP
RU
RW
RFE
RCMP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
REFORM
RO
ROW
ROBERT
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RELATIONS
RAY
ROBERTG
RIGHTS
RM
RATIFICATION
RREL
RBI
RICE
ROOD
REL
RODHAM
RGY
RUEHZO
RELIGIOUS
RELFREE
RUEUN
RELAM
RSP
RF
REO
REGIONAL
RUPREL
RI
REMON
RPEL
RSO
SCUL
SENV
SOCI
SZ
SNAR
SO
SP
SU
SY
SI
SMIG
SYR
SA
SW
SF
SR
SYRIA
SNARM
START
SPECIALIST
SG
SNIG
SCI
SGWI
SE
SIPDIS
SANC
SELAB
SN
SETTLEMENTS
SCIENCE
SENVENV
SENS
SPCE
SPAS
SECURITY
SENC
SOCIETY
SOSI
SENVEAGREAIDTBIOECONSOCIXR
SEN
SPECI
ST
SL
SENVCASCEAIDID
SC
SECRETARY
STR
SNA
SOCIS
SADC
SEP
SK
SHUM
SYAI
SMIL
STEPHEN
SNRV
SKCA
SENSITIVE
SECI
SCUD
SCRM
SGNV
SECTOR
SAARC
SENVSXE
SWMN
STEINBERG
SOPN
SOCR
SCRS
SWE
SARS
SNARIZ
SUDAN
SENVQGR
SAN
SM
SFNV
SSA
SPCVIS
SOFA
SCULKPAOECONTU
SENVKGHG
SHI
SEVN
SH
SNARCS
SNARN
SIPRS
TBIO
TW
TRGY
TSPA
TU
TPHY
TI
TX
TH
TIP
TSPL
TNGD
TZ
TS
TC
TK
TURKEY
TERRORISM
TPSL
TINT
TRSY
TERFIN
TPP
TT
TECHNOLOGY
TE
TAGS
TRAFFICKING
TJ
TN
TO
TD
TP
TREATY
TR
TA
TIO
TECH
TF
TRAD
TNDG
TWI
TPSA
TWL
TAUSCHER
TRBY
TL
TV
THPY
TSPAM
TREL
TRT
TNAR
TFIN
TWCH
THOMMA
THOMAS
TERROR
TRY
TBID
UK
UNESCO
UNSC
UNGA
UN
US
UZ
USEU
UG
UP
UNAUS
UNMIK
USTR
UY
USUN
UNEP
UNDC
UV
UNPUOS
UNSCR
USAID
UNODC
UNRCR
UNHCR
UNDP
UNCRIME
UA
UNHRC
UNRWA
UNO
UNCND
UNCHR
USAU
UNICEF
USPS
UNOMIG
UNESCOSCULPRELPHUMKPALCUIRXFVEKV
UR
UNFICYP
UNCITRAL
UNAMA
UNVIE
USTDA
USNC
UNCSD
USCC
UNEF
UNGAPL
USSC
UNMIC
UNTAC
UNCLASSIFIED
USDA
UNCTAD
USGS
UNFPA
UNSE
USOAS
UE
UAE
UNCHS
UNDESCO
UNC
UNSCS
UKXG
UNGACG
UNHR
UNBRO
UNCHC
UNFCYP
UNIDROIT
WHTI
WIPO
WTRO
WHO
WTO
WMO
WFP
WEET
WS
WE
WA
WHA
WBG
WILLIAM
WI
WSIS
WCL
WEBZ
WZ
WW
WWBG
WMD
WWT
WMN
WWARD
WITH
WTRQ
WCO
WEU
WB
WBEG
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09USUNNEWYORK230, UNGA: UNSC REFORM: INTERGOVERNMENTAL NEGOTIATIONS
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09USUNNEWYORK230.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09USUNNEWYORK230 | 2009-03-10 00:33 | 2011-07-11 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | USUN New York |
VZCZCXYZ0003
OO RUEHWEB
DE RUCNDT #0230/01 0690033
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 100033Z MAR 09
FM USMISSION USUN NEW YORK
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 6033
INFO RUEHGG/UN SECURITY COUNCIL COLLECTIVE IMMEDIATE
RUEHRL/AMEMBASSY BERLIN IMMEDIATE 1022
RUEHBR/AMEMBASSY BRASILIA IMMEDIATE 1073
RUEHIL/AMEMBASSY ISLAMABAD IMMEDIATE 2187
RUEHMD/AMEMBASSY MADRID IMMEDIATE 6343
RUEHNE/AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI IMMEDIATE 2478
RUEHRO/AMEMBASSY ROME IMMEDIATE 1047
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL IMMEDIATE 0997
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO IMMEDIATE 8642
UNCLAS USUN NEW YORK 000230
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
DEPARTMENT FOR USUN/W AND IO/UNP; NSC FOR POWER
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PREL KUNR UNGA UNSC GE JA BR IN
SUBJECT: UNGA: UNSC REFORM: INTERGOVERNMENTAL NEGOTIATIONS
ON CATEGORIES OF MEMBERSHIP
REF: A. USUN NEW YORK 171
¶B. 08 USUN NEW YORK 1200
¶1. (SBU) Summary: The informal plenary of the General
Assembly met March 4 and 5 to begin the substantive phase of
intergovernmental negotiations on Security Council expansion.
80 delegations spoke during the day and a half discussion on
"categories of membership." A core group of states
supporting an intermediate option of longer-term, renewable
elected seats provided more details about their approach.
The Uniting for Consensus (UFC) bloc declared its refusal to
consider expanding permanent seats, but most of its members
indicated a willingness to consider the intermediate option.
The Group of Four (G4) and its supporters argued for an
expansion in both categories and rejected the intermediate
option. The African Group reiterated its demand for two
permanent seats with full privileges and also rejected the
intermediate option. Small states pressed their case for
better access to the Council. USUN spoke on the second day
to support the Chair, after he was criticized by the Egyptian
Perm Rep, to indicate U.S. willingness to consider an
expansion of both categories, though any expansion of
permanent members must be country-specific, and to underline
that whatever formula emerges for expansion, it must factor
in Charter requirements for ratification. The next meeting
will be March 16 on "the question of the veto." End summary.
¶2. (SBU) Comment: While 28 delegations did voice openness to
the intermediate option during the course of the meeting,
including Germany from the G4, the stalwarts of the G4 --
India and Brazil -- continued to press for expansion of both
categories, along with many of their African and small state
supporters in the L.69 group. While many European
delegations, with P-5 members France and the UK in the lead,
and some UFC members believe the intermediate option will be
the solution to eventually garner the support of two-thirds
of the membership, USUN gauges that many G4 members and their
supporters, particularly the African Group, will not be ready
to give up on permanent membership expansion until well into
or even after the second round of intergovernmental
negotiations. For example, the African Group will have to
receive a change in formal instructions from an African Union
summit before it will be able to declare its 53 members in
support of the intermediate option. At that point, the
reform process is likely to accelerate. End comment.
Chair presses for interactive meeting
-------------------------------------
¶3. (SBU) The substantive phase of intergovernmental
negotiations on Security Council expansion began March 4 and
5 with meetings of the informal plenary on "categories of
membership." 80 delegations, including the United States,
spoke during the three sessions. At the start of the
meeting, Afghan Perm Rep and Chairman of intergovernmental
negotiations Zahir Tanin pressed member states to clarify
their position on categories of membership and show
flexibility, including through new proposals. He briefly
referred to his March 2 letter to the membership which also
previewed how the meeting would be run and included an
excerpt from document A/61/47 on categories of membership.
Tanin encouraged representatives to limit their statements to
three minutes, an instruction which a few flatly ignored, and
promised to allow for a second round of interventions to
promote greater interaction. Tanin announced that the next
two meetings would be held March 16 and 25. (Note: USUN
noted to a staff member assisting Tanin from the President of
the General Assembly's office that a plenary meeting on March
25 would conflict with the Security Council's Open Debate on
the Middle East. He responded that they would look at
possible alternative dates. He also confirmed that the March
16 meeting will be on "the question of the veto." End note.)
UK and French press intermediate option;
Russia and China indicate openness to it
----------------------------------------
¶4. (SBU) While the UK and France expressed their support for
an expansion of both categories of members (permanent and
elected), they also promoted the intermediate option. The UK
Perm Rep characterized it as a third category of seats with a
longer, renewable term, possibly 5 years. After 15-20 years,
a review conference would be held to judge whether to
continue with the third category or make additional changes,
i.e. adding more permanent seats. He said that the third
category of seats would be filled by those states more
frequently elected to the Council, thereby freeing up
two-year seats for smaller states. In the negotiations, he
urged the membership to refrain from concentrating on
differences and instead focus on commonalties. The Russian
Perm Rep suggested openness to considering the intermediate
model. He stressed that the final formula should not lead to
a split of the membership and should be above the two-thirds
called for in the UN Charter. The Chinese Perm Rep also
welcomed the intermediate option and said he hoped other new
proposals would be introduced.
More details on intermediate option
-----------------------------------
¶5. (SBU) The Liechtenstein Perm Rep promoted the
intermediate option, arguing that it was the most feasible
option given that it meets the UFC (ten new non-permanent
members and possible alternative rotation schedules) and G4
(six new permanent and four new non-permanent members)
proposals halfway; it does not create an irreversible
situation (i.e. more permanent members); it does not lead to
more veto rights; and it creates a system of accountability
through elections. The Swiss Perm Rep suggested that
countries running for an intermediate seat should meet
certain objective criteria, including contributions to the UN
and peacekeeping operations. He also stressed the absolute
need for a review conference at a fixed date with a fixed
scope but cautioned that any changes emanating from a review
would require additional Charter amendments. The Netherlands
Perm Rep, also supported the intermediate option as a way to
increase the Council's legitimacy and effectiveness without
creating a new power structure, and suggested that a
negotiating session be added to discuss the mechanics of a
review conference.
¶6. (SBU) Singapore, which supports an expansion of both
categories of membership, is also prepared to consider the
intermediate option, according to its Perm Rep. He suggested
that there be a time bar to restrict states from competing
for longer-term renewable seats and two-year seats during the
same period of years, i.e., if you run for "Division I" and
lose then you should be prohibited from running for "Division
II" for a number of years and vice versa. This would ensure
that states do not wage concurrent election campaigns which
would disadvantage small states. He also called for specific
review criteria to be determined in advance for the review
conference, so that it does not degenerate into a popularity
contest. Liechtenstein, Switzerland, Chile, Indonesia, South
Korea all voiced support for Singapore's time bar proposal.
UFC opposes expansion of permanent members;
willing to consider intermediate option
-------------------------------------------
¶7. (SBU) The Uniting for Consensus (UFC) bloc members came
out strongly opposed to any expansion of permanent members
but in favor of an increase in elected members. The
Pakistani Perm Rep argued that each permanent seat added on a
national basis is a permanent blow to the chances of others
to sit on the Council. He also argued for the status of the
current permanent members "to be on the table" in terms of
regional representation and the veto, both of which are the
subject of later meetings. The Italian Perm Rep, noting
Singapore's call for criteria for a review conference, asked
what criteria countries would be judged against for permanent
membership and suggested, for example, their positions on
non-proliferation or their contributions to peacekeeping
operations, noting that Italy was fifth and Japan 80th on the
latter list. The Turkish Perm Rep questioned the permanence
of new permanent members. What if the criteria for new
permanent members are no longer relevant or additional
countries meet them in the future, he asked. The Italian
Perm Rep said that while Italy is not "hugely in favor" of
the intermediate option, it is willing to consider it.
¶8. (SBU) In one of the more well-argued UFC statements, the
Mexican Perm Rep said that expanding the number of permanent
seats flies in the face of the democratization of the Council
and against greater accountability. Permanent members
without a veto would create a new class of Security Council
members and greater stratification and inequality on the
Council. He said that immediate re-election would allow
those who aspire to a continuous presence on the Council to
also be accountable to the membership and that this was
likely the most viable compromise solution. He expressed an
openness to negotiate duration of mandates for non-permanent
seats, in effect the intermediate option. The South Korean
Perm Rep stressed that periodic elections help promote
accountability, and a system that allows winners to continue
without review goes against best practices.
¶9. (SBU) The Costa Rican Perm Rep, a member of the Small
Five States (S5) group, joined the UFC in rejecting an
expansion of permanent members with veto rights, saying veto
rights "should not be handed out like party favors." He
stressed that adding permanent members would only give more
power to "rich members" and reminded the room of the German
Perm Rep's comment that permanent members dominate the
Council (see below). He asked rhetorically whether new
permanent members would deny the representation and interests
of others on the Council.
Group of Four rejects intermediate option;
presses for expansion of both categories
-----------------------------------------
¶10. (SBU) The Group of Four (G-4) and its supporters weighed
in strongly in favor of an expansion in both categories of
membership and against the intermediate option. After the
first three-hour session, bloc members and supporters started
summarizing that their position had "carried the day."
(Comment: By the end of the three sessions, some 57 states
(94 including all of the African Group members, even those
who did not speak or attend) had voiced support for an
expansion in both categories of membership but many expressed
disagreement on other issues which will be discussed later,
such as extension of the veto. End comment.)
¶11. (SBU) The German Perm Rep noted that permanent members
build up expertise in the long-run and therefore dominate
Council discussion. Only by enlarging the number of
permanent members can reform happen, he said. Citing Article
23 of the UN Charter, he called for "countries of the South"
to be represented as well as the largest contributors. The
Indian Perm Rep said that not adding permanent members will
"just leave the oligarchy alone" and that is not reform. He
said that if the membership adds new permanent members, they
can hold them accountable to implement reforms such as on
Security Council working methods. The Japanese Perm Rep,
responding to UFC questions about criteria for permanent
members, said that new permanent members should be judged by
their "readiness, capacity, and resources" to carry out and
monitor the decisions of the Security Council. He referred
to the "totality of contributions," including political,
diplomatic, and stability.
¶12. (SBU) G-4 supporter Cuba said that whole regions cannot
remain unrepresented in the permanent member category and
called for seats for Africa and Latin America and the
Caribbean. He declared that the true power of the Security
Council rests with the permanent five members with their veto
right. The only reasonable reform, he said, is to modify the
representation of developing countries in both categories of
membership. He voiced opposition to the intermediate option
and renewable terms, suggesting another category of
membership could foment divisiveness amongst Council members.
African Group - Quest for
permanent seats continue
-------------------------
¶13. (SBU) The Sierra Leone Perm Rep spoke for the African
Group. He reiterated the Ezulwini Consensus and called for
two permanent seats for African states with all the
privileges of the permanent category and not less than five
non-permanent seats for Africa. He stressed that only a
Council with Africa on it as a permanent member would "right
the historical injustice" and help contribute to
international peace and security. While the Algerian Perm
Rep underlined that only the African Union would choose which
countries would sit in Africa's seats, the South African Perm
Rep later responded that who selects the African states can
be determined later. The Ethiopian Perm Rep called the quest
for a permanent seat for Africa of "paramount importance."
¶14. (SBU) The Ugandan Perm Rep rejected the intermediate
option, saying that it would create a "club of well-resourced
contributors." The Cape Verde Perm Rep said that the
intermediate option would not be true reform since it would
not address the two original categories of membership and
that Africa is unlikely to give up its hope and aspirations
for a permanent seat. The Egyptian Perm Rep said the
intermediate option does not fit African demands and will
only lead to their postponement. The Algerian Perm Rep said
now was not the time for serious discussion of the
intermediate option, but perhaps it would be after the second
round.
Small states
------------
¶15. (SBU) Many small island states, like Fiji, are G4
supporters. The Fiji Perm Rep voiced support for an
expansion in both categories, noting that all states can
contribute to international peace and security, and citing
Fiji's peacekeeping contributions as an example. He, like
many representatives of small island states, called for
better access to the Council. Another small island state
representative had a different perspective. The Maltese Perm
Rep said that an increase of permanent members would only
"increase the privileges and prerogatives of a few for a few
more" and called for negotiations to focus only on the
addition of non-permanent seats. The St. Vincent and the
Grenadines representative, another G4 supporter, called for
Article 23(1) of the Charter to be specific on more than just
"equitable geographical distribution" for members of the
Council and suggested an amendment to include "distribution
of geography, vulnerability, and development status." He
rejected the intermediate option, saying it would relegate
two-year non-permanent members to third class status.
¶16. (SBU) Several UFC members, including Italy and Pakistan,
voiced support for a specific elected seat for small states.
The Indian Perm Rep, commenting on the calls by small states
for representation, noted that there is no "small state"
category at the UN. In response, the Maltese Perm Rep said
that small states should present to the membership their own
list of small states.
Other proposals
---------------
¶17. (SBU) UFC leader Italy suggested that there should be
new non-permanent seats for regions, including the Africa
Group, Asia, GRULAC, and the European Union. The UK Perm Rep
quickly took issue with Italy's suggestion of non-permanent
seats for regional organizations, saying the Security Council
is for member states, not regional organizations. The Indian
Perm Rep later challenged the Italian proposal, noting that
all non-permanent seats are already permanent regional seats
and that it has not led to greater accountability. He also
challenged the UFC as "dismissive of Africa's request for a
permanent seat." They already have non-permanent seats, he
said. Panama voiced support for the original G4 proposal but
noted that there was not sufficiently broad support and
suggested an alternative intermediate category of membership:
six new members elected for 5-year renewable terms. If a
state is elected for four consecutive terms in this category,
it would become a permanent member. The Slovenian Perm Rep
reiterated the Slovenian President's proposal (ref B) of six
additional permanent members plus an additional category of
elected members with more frequent rotation (twelve countries
would be selected to fill six non-permanent seats and would
serve alternating two-year terms for a total period of twelve
years).
¶18. (SBU) The Syrian Perm Rep, speaking for the Arab Group,
said there should be an equitable geographic distribution of
permanent seats and called for an Arab permanent seat to be
rotated amongst Arab League members. The French Perm Rep
also expressed openness towards a possible permanent seat for
an Arab state, in addition to supporting Germany, Brazil,
Japan, and an African state. The Bolivian Perm Rep
introduced his own proposal -- the elimination of the
permanent category and electing only one category of
membership on the Security Council.
U.S. Intervention
---------------
¶19. (SBU) After listening to two sessions of debate, USUN
decided to speak during the last session. Just before the
end of the second session, the Egyptian Perm Rep lodged a
"personal attack" against the Chair, Ambassador Tanin,
stressing repeatedly that neither he nor the President of the
General Assembly (PGA) has the right to lead the process, as
that is up to the member states. To show continued U.S.
support for the Chair and to note the U.S. position on
categories of membership, Ambassador Wolff commended the
Chair's honest and professional efforts to ensure that the
process proceeds in "good faith and with mutual respect and
in an open, inclusive and transparent manner" (per GA
Decision 62/557). He reiterated Ambassador Rice's February
19 statement that the long-term viability of the Council
depends on its reflecting the world of the 21st century and
that the U.S. would make a serious effort to find a way
forward that enhances the ability of the Council to carry out
its mandate and effectively meet the challenges of the new
century.
¶20. (SBU) Ambassador Wolff voiced U.S. openness in principle
to a limited expansion of both permanent and non-permanent
members. He stressed that any consideration of an expansion
of permanent members must by definition be country-specific
in nature and that we will take into account the ability of
countries to contribute to the maintenance of international
peace and security, and the other purposes of the United
Nations. He concluded by noting that whatever formula that
emerges for an expansion of Council membership must factor in
Charter requirements for ratification, so the membership
should avoid dwelling excessively on proposals that are
unlikely to be fruitful avenues of pursuit. (Note: PGA
Senior Advisor Ambassador Magda Enriquez Beitler told USUN
that U.S. remarks were welcomed and helpful. Both G4 and UFC
supporters voiced appreciation for the U.S. statement. End
note.)
Rice