

Currently released so far... 51122 / 251,287
Articles
Brazil
Sri Lanka
United Kingdom
Sweden
00. Editorial
United States
Latin America
Egypt
Jordan
Yemen
Thailand
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
2011/05/18
2011/05/19
2011/05/20
2011/05/21
2011/05/22
2011/05/23
2011/05/24
2011/05/25
2011/05/26
2011/05/27
2011/05/28
2011/05/29
2011/05/30
2011/05/31
2011/06/01
2011/06/02
2011/06/03
2011/06/04
2011/06/05
2011/06/06
2011/06/07
2011/06/08
2011/06/09
2011/06/10
2011/06/11
2011/06/12
2011/06/13
2011/06/14
2011/06/15
2011/06/16
2011/06/17
2011/06/18
2011/06/19
2011/06/20
2011/06/21
2011/06/22
2011/06/23
2011/06/24
2011/06/25
2011/06/26
2011/06/27
2011/06/28
2011/06/29
2011/06/30
2011/07/01
2011/07/02
2011/07/04
2011/07/05
2011/07/06
2011/07/07
2011/07/08
2011/07/10
2011/07/11
2011/07/12
2011/07/13
2011/07/14
2011/07/15
2011/07/16
2011/07/17
2011/07/18
2011/07/19
2011/07/20
2011/07/21
2011/07/22
2011/07/23
2011/07/25
2011/07/27
2011/07/28
2011/07/29
2011/07/31
2011/08/01
2011/08/02
2011/08/03
2011/08/05
2011/08/06
2011/08/07
2011/08/08
2011/08/09
2011/08/10
2011/08/11
2011/08/12
2011/08/13
2011/08/15
2011/08/16
2011/08/17
2011/08/18
2011/08/19
2011/08/21
2011/08/22
2011/08/23
2011/08/24
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Antananarivo
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Alexandria
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embasy Bonn
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Brazzaville
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangui
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Belfast
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Cotonou
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chiang Mai
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Chengdu
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
DIR FSINFATC
Consulate Dusseldorf
Consulate Durban
Consulate Dubai
Consulate Dhahran
Embassy Guatemala
Embassy Grenada
Embassy Georgetown
Embassy Gaborone
Consulate Guayaquil
Consulate Guangzhou
Consulate Guadalajara
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Hong Kong
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kolonia
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Krakow
Consulate Kolkata
Consulate Karachi
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Lusaka
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Lome
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy Libreville
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Leipzig
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Mission Geneva
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Mogadishu
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maseru
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Merida
Consulate Melbourne
Consulate Matamoros
Consulate Marseille
Embassy Nouakchott
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Nuevo Laredo
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Consulate Nagoya
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Praia
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Moresby
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Podgorica
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Hillah
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Surabaya
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy Tirana
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
Consulate Thessaloniki
USUN New York
USMISSION USTR GENEVA
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Mission CD Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
UN Rome
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vientiane
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AMGT
ASEC
AEMR
AR
APECO
AU
AORC
ADANA
AJ
AF
AFIN
AMED
AS
AM
ABLD
AFFAIRS
AMB
APER
ACOA
AND
AA
AE
AADP
AID
AO
AL
AG
AORD
ADM
AINF
AINT
ASEAN
AORG
ABT
APEC
AY
ASUP
ARF
AGOA
AVIAN
ATRN
ANET
AGIT
ASECVE
ABUD
AODE
ALOW
ADB
AN
ADPM
ASPA
ARABL
AFSN
AZ
AC
AIAG
AFSI
ASCE
ASIG
ACABQ
ADIP
AFGHANISTAN
AROC
ADCO
ACOTA
ANARCHISTS
AMEDCASCKFLO
AK
ARABBL
ASCH
ANTITERRORISM
AGRICULTURE
AOCR
ARR
ASSEMBLY
AORCYM
AFPK
ACKM
AGMT
AEC
APRC
AIN
AFPREL
ASFC
ASECTH
AFSA
AINR
AOPC
AFAF
AFARI
AX
ASECAF
ASECAFIN
AT
AFZAL
APCS
AGAO
AIT
ARCH
AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL
AMEX
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AORCD
AVIATION
ARAS
AINFCY
ACBAQ
AOPR
AREP
AOIC
ASEX
ASEK
AER
AGR
AMCT
AVERY
APR
AEMRS
AFU
AMG
ATPDEA
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AORL
ACS
AMCHAMS
AECL
AUC
ACAO
BA
BR
BB
BG
BEXP
BY
BRUSSELS
BU
BD
BTIO
BK
BL
BE
BMGT
BO
BM
BX
BN
BWC
BBSR
BTT
BC
BH
BILAT
BUSH
BHUM
BT
BTC
BMENA
BOND
BAIO
BP
BF
BRPA
BURNS
BUT
BBG
BCW
BOEHNER
BOL
BASHAR
BIDEN
BFIN
BZ
BEXPC
BTIU
CPAS
CA
CASC
CS
CBW
CIDA
CO
CODEL
CI
CROS
CU
CH
CWC
CMGT
CVIS
CDG
CTR
CG
CF
CHIEF
CJAN
CBSA
CE
CY
CB
CW
CM
CHR
CD
COE
CV
COUNTER
CT
CN
CPUOS
CTERR
CVR
CVPR
CDC
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CONS
COM
CACS
CR
CONTROLS
CAN
CACM
COMMERCE
CAMBODIA
CFIS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITES
CONDOLEEZZA
CZ
CTBT
CEN
CLINTON
CFED
CARC
CTM
CARICOM
CSW
CICTE
CYPRUS
CBE
CMGMT
CARSON
CWCM
CIVS
COUNTRYCLEARANCE
CENTCOM
CAPC
COPUOS
CKGR
CITEL
CQ
CITT
CIC
CARIB
CVIC
CAFTA
CVISU
CDB
CEDAW
CNC
CJUS
COMMAND
CENTER
COL
CAJC
CONSULAR
CLMT
CBC
CIA
CNARC
CIS
CEUDA
CHINA
CAC
CL
DR
DJ
DEMOCRATIC
DEMARCHE
DOMESTIC
DISENGAGEMENT
DB
DA
DHS
DAO
DCM
DAVID
DO
DEAX
DEFENSE
DEA
DTRO
DPRK
DOC
DTRA
DK
DAC
DOD
DRL
DRC
DCG
DE
DOT
DEPT
DOE
DS
DKEM
ECON
ETTC
EFIS
ETRD
EC
EMIN
EAGR
EAID
EFIN
EUN
ECIN
EG
EWWT
EINV
ENRG
ELAB
EPET
EIND
EN
EAIR
EUMEM
ECPS
ES
EI
ELTN
ET
EZ
EU
ER
EINT
ENGR
ECONOMIC
ENIV
EFTA
ETRN
EMS
EUREM
EPA
ESTH
EEB
EET
ENV
EAG
EXIM
ECTRD
ELNT
ENVIRONMENT
ECA
EAP
EINDIR
ETR
ECONOMY
ETRC
ELECTIONS
EICN
EXPORT
EARG
EGHG
EID
ETRO
EINF
EAIDHO
ECIP
EENV
EURM
EPEC
ERNG
ENERG
EIAD
EXBS
ED
EREL
ELAM
EK
EWT
ENGRD
EDEV
ECE
ENGY
EXIMOPIC
ETRDEC
ECCT
EUR
ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID
EFI
ECOSOC
EXTERNAL
ESCAP
ETCC
EENG
ERA
ENRD
ECLAC
ETRAD
EBRD
ENVR
ECONENRG
ELTNSNAR
ELAP
EPIT
EDUC
EAIDXMXAXBXFFR
EETC
EIVN
EDRC
EGOV
ETRA
EAIDRW
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ESA
ETRDGK
ENVI
ELN
EPRT
EPTED
ERTD
EUM
EAIDS
EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM
EDU
EV
EAIDAF
EDA
EPREL
EINVEFIN
EAGER
ETMIN
EUCOM
ECCP
EIDN
EINVKSCA
ENNP
EFINECONCS
ETC
EAIRASECCASCID
EINN
ETRP
ECONOMICS
ENERGY
EIAR
EINDETRD
ECONEFIN
EURN
ETRDEINVTINTCS
EFIM
ETIO
EATO
EIPR
EINVETC
ETTD
ETDR
EIQ
ECONCS
ENRGIZ
EAIG
ENTG
EUC
ERD
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECUN
FR
FI
FOREIGN
FARM
FIR
FAO
FK
FARC
FAS
FJ
FREEDOM
FAC
FINANCE
FBI
FTAA
FM
FCS
FAA
FORCE
FDA
FTA
FT
FCSC
FMGT
FINR
FIN
FDIC
FOR
FOI
FO
FMLN
FISO
GM
GERARD
GT
GA
GG
GR
GTIP
GH
GZ
GE
GB
GY
GAZA
GJ
GEORGE
GOI
GCC
GMUS
GI
GLOBAL
GV
GC
GL
GOV
GKGIC
GF
GWI
GIPNC
GUTIERREZ
GTMO
GANGS
GAERC
GUILLERMO
GASPAR
HR
HA
HYMPSK
HO
HK
HUMAN
HU
HN
HHS
HURI
HUD
HUMRIT
HUMANITARIAN
HUMANR
HL
HSTC
HILLARY
HCOPIL
HADLEY
HOURANI
HI
HUM
HEBRON
HUMOR
IZ
IN
IAEA
IS
IMO
ILO
IR
IC
IT
ITU
ID
IV
IMF
IBRD
IWC
ICAO
ICRC
INF
IO
IPR
ISO
IK
ISRAELI
IQ
ICES
IDB
INFLUENZA
IRAQI
ISCON
IGAD
IRAN
ITALY
IRAQ
ICTY
ICTR
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IQNV
IADB
INTERNAL
INMARSAT
IRDB
ILC
INCB
INRB
ICJ
ISRAEL
INR
IEA
ISPA
ICCAT
IOM
ITRD
IHO
IL
IFAD
ITRA
IDLI
ISCA
INL
INRA
INTELSAT
ISAF
ISPL
IRS
IEF
ITER
INDO
IIP
IND
IEFIN
IACI
IAHRC
INNP
IA
INTERPOL
IFIN
ISSUES
IZPREL
IRAJ
IF
ITPHUM
ITA
IP
IRPE
IDA
ISLAMISTS
ITF
INRO
IBET
IDP
IRC
KMDR
KPAO
KOMC
KNNP
KFLO
KDEM
KSUM
KIPR
KFLU
KE
KCRM
KJUS
KAWC
KZ
KSCA
KDRG
KCOR
KGHG
KPAL
KTIP
KMCA
KCRS
KPKO
KOLY
KRVC
KVPR
KG
KWBG
KTER
KS
KN
KSPR
KWMN
KV
KTFN
KFRD
KU
KSTC
KSTH
KISL
KGIC
KSEP
KFIN
KTEX
KTIA
KUNR
KCMR
KCIP
KMOC
KTDB
KBIO
KBCT
KMPI
KSAF
KACT
KFEM
KPRV
KPWR
KIRC
KCFE
KRIM
KHIV
KHLS
KVIR
KNNNP
KCEM
KLIG
KIRF
KNUP
KSAC
KNUC
KPGOV
KTDD
KIDE
KOMS
KLFU
KNNC
KMFO
KSEO
KJRE
KJUST
KMRS
KSRE
KGIT
KPIR
KPOA
KUWAIT
KIVP
KICC
KSCS
KPOL
KSEAO
KRCM
KSCI
KNAP
KGLB
KICA
KCUL
KPRM
KFSC
KQ
KPOP
KPFO
KPALAOIS
KREC
KBWG
KR
KTTB
KNAR
KCOM
KESS
KINR
KOCI
KWN
KCSY
KREL
KTBT
KFTN
KW
KRFD
KFLOA
KHDP
KNEP
KIND
KHUM
KSKN
KOMO
KDRL
KTFIN
KSOC
KPO
KGIV
KSTCPL
KSI
KPRP
KFPC
KNNB
KNDP
KICCPUR
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KDMR
KFCE
KIMMITT
KMCC
KMNP
KSEC
KOMCSG
KGCC
KRAD
KCRP
KAUST
KWAWC
KCHG
KRDP
KPAS
KTIAPARM
KPAOPREL
KWGB
KIRP
KMIG
KLAB
KSEI
KHSA
KNPP
KPAONZ
KWWW
KGHA
KY
KCRIM
KCRCM
KGCN
KPLS
KIIP
KPAOY
KTRD
KTAO
KJU
KBTS
KWAC
KFIU
KNNO
KPAI
KILS
KPA
KRCS
KWBGSY
KNPPIS
KNNPMNUC
KNPT
KERG
KLTN
KPREL
KTLA
KO
KAWK
KVRP
KAID
KX
KENV
KWCI
KNPR
KCFC
KNEI
KFTFN
KTFM
KCERS
KDEMAF
KMEPI
KEMS
KBTR
KEDU
KIRL
KNNR
KMPT
KPDD
KPIN
KDEV
KFRP
KTBD
KMSG
KWWMN
KWBC
KA
KOM
KWNM
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KRGY
KNNF
KICR
KIFR
KWMNCS
KPAK
KDDG
KCGC
KID
KNSD
KMPF
KWMM
MARR
MX
MASS
MOPS
MNUC
MCAP
MTCRE
MRCRE
MTRE
MASC
MY
MK
MG
MU
MILI
MO
MZ
MEPP
MCC
MEDIA
MOPPS
MI
MAS
MW
MP
MEPN
MV
MD
MR
MC
MCA
MT
MIL
MARITIME
MOPSGRPARM
MAAR
MOOPS
ML
MA
MN
MNUCPTEREZ
MTCR
MUNC
MPOS
MONUC
MGMT
MURRAY
MACP
MINUSTAH
MCCONNELL
MGT
MNUR
MF
MEPI
MOHAMMAD
MAR
MAPP
MNU
MFA
MTS
MLS
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MED
MNVC
MIK
MBM
MILITARY
MAPS
MARAD
MDC
MACEDONIA
MASSMNUC
MUCN
MQADHAFI
MPS
NZ
NATO
NI
NO
NU
NG
NL
NPT
NS
NA
NP
NASA
NSF
NEA
NANCY
NSG
NRR
NATIONAL
NMNUC
NC
NSC
NAS
NARC
NELSON
NATEU
NDP
NIH
NK
NIPP
NR
NERG
NSSP
NE
NTDB
NT
NEGROPONTE
NGO
NATOIRAQ
NAR
NZUS
NCCC
NH
NAFTA
NEW
NRG
NUIN
NOVO
NATOPREL
NV
NICHOLAS
NPA
NSFO
NW
NORAD
NPG
NOAA
OPRC
OPDC
OTRA
OECD
OVIP
OREP
ODC
OIIP
OAS
OSCE
OPIC
OMS
OFDP
OFDA
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OSCI
OM
OPAD
ODPC
OIC
ODIP
OPPI
ORA
OCEA
OREG
OMIG
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXP
OPEC
OFPD
OAU
OCII
OIL
OVIPPRELUNGANU
OSHA
OPCD
OPCR
OF
OFDPQIS
OSIC
OHUM
OTR
OBSP
OGAC
OESC
OVP
ON
OES
OTAR
OCS
PREL
PGOV
PARM
PINR
PHUM
PM
PREF
PTER
PK
PINS
PBIO
PHSA
PE
PBTS
PA
PL
POL
PAK
POV
POLITICS
POLICY
PO
PRELTBIOBA
PKO
PIN
PNAT
PU
PGOVPREL
PALESTINIAN
PTERPGOV
PELOSI
PAS
PP
PTEL
PROP
PRELAF
PRHUM
PRE
PUNE
PIRF
PVOV
PROG
PERSONS
PROV
PKK
PRGOV
PH
PLAB
PDEM
PCI
PRL
PRM
PINSO
PERM
PETR
PPAO
PERL
PBS
PETERS
PRELBR
PCON
POLITICAL
PMIL
POLM
PKPA
PNUM
PLO
PTERM
PJUS
PARMP
PNIR
PHUMKPAL
PG
PREZ
PGIC
PAO
PROTECTION
PRELPK
PGOVENRG
PATTY
PSOC
PARTIES
PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ
PMIG
PAIGH
PARK
PETER
PHUS
PKPO
PGOVECON
POUS
PMAR
PWBG
PAR
PGOVGM
PHUH
PTE
PY
POLUN
PDOV
PGOVSOCI
PGOVPM
PRELEVU
PGOR
PBTSRU
PHUMA
PHUMR
PPD
PGV
PRAM
PARMS
PINL
PSI
PKPAL
PPA
PTERE
PGOF
PINO
PREO
PHAS
PAC
PRESL
PORG
PS
PGVO
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PINT
PRELP
PREFA
PNG
PTBS
PFOR
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PREK
PHJM
POLINT
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PECON
PEACE
PROCESS
PLN
PEDRO
PF
PGPV
PCUL
PGGV
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGIV
PHUMPREL
POGOV
PEL
PBT
PAMQ
PINF
PSEPC
POSTS
PAHO
PHUMPGOV
PGOC
PNR
RS
RP
RU
RW
RFE
RCMP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
REFORM
RO
ROW
ROBERT
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RELATIONS
RAY
ROBERTG
RIGHTS
RM
RATIFICATION
RREL
RBI
RICE
ROOD
REL
RODHAM
RGY
RUEHZO
RELIGIOUS
RELFREE
RUEUN
RELAM
RSP
RF
REO
REGIONAL
RUPREL
RI
REMON
RPEL
RSO
SCUL
SENV
SOCI
SZ
SNAR
SO
SP
SU
SY
SI
SMIG
SYR
SA
SW
SF
SR
SYRIA
SNARM
START
SPECIALIST
SG
SNIG
SCI
SGWI
SE
SIPDIS
SANC
SELAB
SN
SETTLEMENTS
SCIENCE
SENVENV
SENS
SPCE
SPAS
SECURITY
SENC
SOCIETY
SOSI
SENVEAGREAIDTBIOECONSOCIXR
SEN
SPECI
ST
SL
SENVCASCEAIDID
SC
SECRETARY
STR
SNA
SOCIS
SADC
SEP
SK
SHUM
SYAI
SMIL
STEPHEN
SNRV
SKCA
SENSITIVE
SECI
SCUD
SCRM
SGNV
SECTOR
SAARC
SENVSXE
SWMN
STEINBERG
SOPN
SOCR
SCRS
SWE
SARS
SNARIZ
SUDAN
SENVQGR
SAN
SM
SFNV
SSA
SPCVIS
SOFA
SCULKPAOECONTU
SENVKGHG
SHI
SEVN
SH
SNARCS
SNARN
SIPRS
TBIO
TW
TRGY
TSPA
TU
TPHY
TI
TX
TH
TIP
TSPL
TNGD
TZ
TS
TC
TK
TURKEY
TERRORISM
TPSL
TINT
TRSY
TERFIN
TPP
TT
TECHNOLOGY
TE
TAGS
TRAFFICKING
TJ
TN
TO
TD
TP
TREATY
TR
TA
TIO
TECH
TF
TRAD
TNDG
TWI
TPSA
TWL
TAUSCHER
TRBY
TL
TV
THPY
TSPAM
TREL
TRT
TNAR
TFIN
TWCH
THOMMA
THOMAS
TERROR
TRY
TBID
UK
UNESCO
UNSC
UNGA
UN
US
UZ
USEU
UG
UP
UNAUS
UNMIK
USTR
UY
USUN
UNEP
UNDC
UV
UNPUOS
UNSCR
USAID
UNODC
UNRCR
UNHCR
UNDP
UNCRIME
UA
UNHRC
UNRWA
UNO
UNCND
UNCHR
USAU
UNICEF
USPS
UNOMIG
UNESCOSCULPRELPHUMKPALCUIRXFVEKV
UR
UNFICYP
UNCITRAL
UNAMA
UNVIE
USTDA
USNC
UNCSD
USCC
UNEF
UNGAPL
USSC
UNMIC
UNTAC
UNCLASSIFIED
USDA
UNCTAD
USGS
UNFPA
UNSE
USOAS
UE
UAE
UNCHS
UNDESCO
UNC
UNSCS
UKXG
UNGACG
UNHR
UNBRO
UNCHC
UNFCYP
UNIDROIT
WHTI
WIPO
WTRO
WHO
WTO
WMO
WFP
WEET
WS
WE
WA
WHA
WBG
WILLIAM
WI
WSIS
WCL
WEBZ
WZ
WW
WWBG
WMD
WWT
WMN
WWARD
WITH
WTRQ
WCO
WEU
WB
WBEG
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 08TOKYO2097, DASD MAHNKEN MEETINGS IN JAPAN ON BILATERAL
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08TOKYO2097.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
08TOKYO2097 | 2008-07-31 05:27 | 2011-06-15 02:00 | SECRET | Embassy Tokyo |
VZCZCXRO9944
PP RUEHDT RUEHPB
DE RUEHKO #2097/01 2130527
ZNY SSSSS ZZH
P 310527Z JUL 08
FM AMEMBASSY TOKYO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 6201
INFO RUCNARF/ASEAN REGIONAL FORUM COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING PRIORITY 4641
RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW PRIORITY 2442
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL PRIORITY 0632
RUEHFK/AMCONSUL FUKUOKA PRIORITY 9122
RUEHNH/AMCONSUL NAHA PRIORITY 1496
RUEHOK/AMCONSUL OSAKA KOBE PRIORITY 2852
RUEHKSO/AMCONSUL SAPPORO PRIORITY 9705
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEHIN/AIT TAIPEI PRIORITY 7095
RHEHAAA/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RHHMUNA/HQ USPACOM HONOLULU HI PRIORITY
RUHPSAA/COMMARFORPAC PRIORITY
RHHMHBA/COMPACFLT PEARL HARBOR HI PRIORITY
RHMFISS/USFJ PRIORITY
RHOVVKG/COMSEVENTHFLT PRIORITY
RHMFISS/COMUSKOREA SEOUL KOR PRIORITY
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
S E C R E T SECTION 01 OF 05 TOKYO 002097
SIPDIS
DOD FOR OSD/APSA SEDNEY/HILL/BASALLA/GEIS
DOD FOR OSD/PLANNING MAHNKEN/YOUNG
JOINT STAFF FOR J5 WEIR/KOSINSKI
JOINT STAFF FOR J7 ROUNDS/MUTTY/NELSON
PACOM FOR J00/J01/J3/J5
USFJ FOR J00/J01/J3/J5
E.O. 12958: DECL: 07/30/2023
TAGS: PGOV JA MARR PARM PGOV PINR PREL
SUBJECT: DASD MAHNKEN MEETINGS IN JAPAN ON BILATERAL
PLANNING
TOKYO 00002097 001.2 OF 005
Classified By: Deputy Chief of Mission James Zumwalt. Reasons 1.4 (b) a
nd (d).
¶1. (S) SUMMARY: Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for
Policy Planning Dr. Thomas Mahnken met with Japanese
counterparts from the Ministries of Defense and Foreign
Affairs (MOD and MOFA), Cabinet Secretariat and the Japan
Self Defense Forces Joint Staff Office (JSDF JSO) on July 17
to encourage continued progress on bilateral planning.
During his meetings, DASD Mahnken highlighted the need for
timely U.S. military access to Japanese civilian air and sea
ports during a Korean Peninsula contingency. He also pressed
for the quick completion of surveys of those facilities.
DASD Mahnken stressed the need for timely decision-making by
Japan to support a U.S. contingency response and urged Japan
to include a decision matrix in the next cycle of bilateral
planning for Concept Plan (CONPLAN) 5055. He also emphasized
the need for early activation of the Bilateral Coordination
Mechanism (BCM), and in particular the Bilateral Coordination
Center (BCC) that facilitates military coordination, critical
for effective contingency response. MOFA and MOD outlined
the difficulties in conducting certain site surveys and
reviewed the limits of the central government's authority
over prefecture and privately-owned ports. The JSO briefed
on JSDF military activities during contingencies in the area,
including the use of civilian air and sea ports to support
the evacuation of Japanese nationals from South Korea during
a contingency. MOD, MOFA, and JSO representatives agreed
with the need for early military coordination in a
contingency and said they are moving toward a more ""flexible
activation"" of the BCC. End summary.
¶2. (U) DASD for Policy Planning Dr. Thomas Mahnken led a July
17 meeting on bilateral contingency planning with MOD, MOFA
and JSDF JSO counterparts. The lead Japanese representatives
were MOD Deputy Director General (DDG) for Defense Policy
Ryutaro Matsumoto, MOFA DDG for North American Affairs Koji
Haneda, Cabinet Secretariat Counsellor Takai Kawashima, JSO
Operations Division (J3) head COL Shigeki Muto, and JSO
Defense and International Policy Division (J-5) head CAPT
Tatsuhiko Takashima. Representatives from the Office of the
Secretary of Defense's Japan Desk and Policy Planning Office,
U.S. Joint Staff, Pacific Command (PACOM), U.S. Forces Japan
(USFJ), and the Embassy also participated in the day-long
meeting.
Briefing on U.S. Access to Japanese Air and Sea Ports
--------------------------------------------- --------
¶3. (S) At Japan's request, representatives from PACOM briefed
on the current concept of operations for strategic maneuver
options and military deployments to Japan in a Korean
Peninsula contingency. The presentation focused on
air-to-air and air-to-sea transload options for passengers
and cargo, as well as the anticipated U.S. military need for
access to and logistics support at Japan's civilian airports
and sea ports during a U.S. military contingency response.
This PACOM ""transparency briefing"" followed a similar
presentation by PACOM Deputy J-5 Brig Gen Sam Angelella on
May 19, 2008, in Tokyo, in response to requests from Japan
for information on U.S. contingency response plans to support
the completion of site surveys of 23 Japanese civilian air
and sea ports.
¶4. (S) The brief included the current estimated number of
required parking places for aircraft, expected passenger
throughput and tonnage, fuel requirements, and the planned
aircraft bed down. PACOM stressed that one of the most
significant risks to the current contingency plan is not
having early access to Japan's air and sea ports. The United
States will need 24-hour, seven-days-a-week access to Japan's
air and seaports at least two days prior to the start of
conflict and will need access to the facilities within 48
hours after making a request.
¶5. (S) Dr. Mahnken stressed that the results of the site
surveys are necessary to clearly understand the current
capacity and logistic support capabilities at Japan's
civilian air and sea ports. This will allow the United States
to validate its current plans and to be more flexible in
determining which bases could be used in a crisis. (Note:
Japan agreed to conduct these site surveys in the October
2005 Security Consultative Committee (SCC) Joint Statement.
End note.)
¶6. (S) MOFA DDG Haneda noted that the models for air and sea
port usage should take into account the ownership of each
facility, i.e. whether owned and controlled by the central
government, prefecture, private entity or port authority.
The models also need to take into account the specific
authorities the central government has over the facilities in
peacetime, during a ""situation in areas surrounding Japan""
(SIASJ), or after an attack on Japan. For instance, SIASJ
only allows the central government to request action of
prefecture and privately-owned ports, whereas during an armed
attack against Japan the Prime Minister has the authority to
move Japan civil/private planes and ships, MOFA and JSO
representatives noted.
Site Surveys of Civilian Airports and Seaports
--------------------------------------------- -
¶7. (S) DASD Mahnken thanked his counterparts for completing
the site surveys of two airports and two seaports, while
stating the importance of quickly completing the remaining
site surveys and pressing Japan to provide a timeline for
completion. While not providing a timeline, MOFA DDG Haneda
indicated that the next survey would be at Shimonoseki
seaport in August. MOD and MOFA representatives explained
the difficulty of completing some of the remaining Phase 1
site surveys due to historical reasons (such as Nagasaki),
areas that are opposition party strongholds, or the lack of
central government ownership (Kansai International Airport).
An additional constraint is that the government cannot reveal
the purpose of the site surveys to the public.
¶8. (S) MOD asked whether using publicly available data, in
lieu of visiting the facilities, could satisfy the survey
requirements. U.S. representatives said the method for
meeting the survey requirements is up to Japan, however, the
data requested by U.S. Transportation Command (TRANSCOM) is
what is needed to understand the capacity of each facility.
Some of the required data can only be obtained by doing
physical inspections. DASD Mahnken suggested that Japan
might start surveys on easier Phase 2 facilities while
working out the issues over the more difficult Phase 1
facilities.
JSDF Planning for a Korean Contingency
--------------------------------------
¶9. (S) MOD and JSO representatives gave a presentation on
JSDF activities in a Korean Peninsula contingency, including
the use of air and sea ports during SIASJ and an armed attack
against Japan, with a particular emphasis on operations to
support the transport of Japanese nationals overseas (TJNO),
equivalent to U.S. non-combatant evacuation operations (NEO).
Japan plans to send JSDF ships and aircraft to South Korea
for TJNO during SIASJ, if necessary to augment Japan civil
air and sea capacity. Japan would need to get Republic of
Korea prior approval and MOD would need to be confident that
transport by JSDF aircraft would be safe, i.e. they would not
be transiting, entering or departing from hostilities.
Significant JSDF activities would include convoy support and
minesweeping, search and rescue operations, and ship
inspections. JSO representatives noted that minesweeping
activities by the JSDF is allowed under SIASJ against
""abandoned mines,"" i.e. floating mines or mines otherwise
seemingly dumped off a ship and abandoned. JSO suggested
that the ""abandoned mines"" concept would allow Japan the
flexibility to conduct minesweeping operations but asked that
the United States not press for further definition of an
abandoned mine.
Bilateral Planning Schedule for CONPLAN 5055
--------------------------------------------
¶10. (S) USFJ reviewed the agreed schedule for the next cycle
of bilateral planning for Concept Plan (CONPLAN) 5055. The
current CONPLAN 5055-07 was bilaterally approved in September
¶2007. The recent bilateral agreement on the tasking for the
Comprehensive Security Assessment (CSA) and the Subcommittee
for Defense Cooperation (SDC) Bilateral Planning Framework
and Guidance will allow detailed planning work to begin on
CONPLAN 5055-09 in September 2008. The CSA will be completed
in March 2009 and the draft CONPLAN 5055-09 and associated
annexes will be completed in July 2009. Following draft plan
completion, a review and approval process will be conducted
by both sides. The completed CONPLAN 5055-09 should be signed
in September 2009.
Risks and Assumptions in CONPLAN 5055
-------------------------------------
¶11. (S) The United States led a discussion on the risks
associated with our current assumptions in CONPLAN 5055. The
focus of that discussion centered primarily on the need for
timely decision-making and quick establishment of the
Bilateral Coordination Mechanism (BCM), particularly during
the early phases of a contingency. Building on the earlier
""transparency briefing,"" U.S. participants stressed the need
to better understand Japan's decision-making, particularly
when moving from peacetime to SIASJ.
¶12. (S) MOFA stated that Japan does not ""declare"" SIASJ on
its own behalf, but rather the implementation of SIASJ is a
bilateral event that allows Japan to provide support to U.S.
forces. The U.S. would inform Japan that a contingency
around Japan is likely and to provide information on the U.S.
requirements for Japan's support. MOFA would then forward
the request to activate SIASJ measures to the Cabinet for a
decision. U.S. participants noted that the United States
sees the implementation of SIASJ as ultimately a unilateral
decision by Japan. DASD Mahnken commented that the
discussion on decision responsibilities and timing warrants
the development of a decision-making matrix for CONPLAN 5055
that would track the sequencing of unilateral and bilateral
decisions needed during a contingency. (Note: This is a USFJ
initiative included in the SDC Bilateral Planning Guidance
for 5055-09 that the Japanese Joint Staff had resisted at
working levels. End note.) Both sides agreed to begin
coordination on a decision matrix for 5055.
Bilateral Coordination Needed Prior to a Contingency
--------------------------------------------- -------
¶13. (S) Discussions on the need for early activation of the
Bilateral Coordination Mechanism (BCM) and the Bilateral
Coordination Center (BCC) included a review of Japan's
response to North Korea's July 2006 missile test. The
Embassy Political Minister Counselor noted that coordination
of operations and intelligence in the run-up to, and
following the July 2006 North Korean missile launches, had
been ad hoc. Many with a need-to-know in the Japanese
government had not been informed of intelligence data and
operational issues. MOFA representatives responded that
Japan had not seen a need to stand up the BCM and BCC as
there had not been any operational issues necessitating
coordination. Embassy PolMinCouns responded that there had
been a clear operational need at that time. For example U.S.
and Japan Aegis ships were operating in the Sea of Japan and
needed to share data and coordinate with one another.
Japanese government officials also needed to be aware of our
Navy and MSDF operations. The creation of the ad hoc
Azabudai Group, consisting of senior Japanese policy-makers,
Embassy officials, and USFJ representatives, to deal with the
crisis at that time is evidence that added bilateral
coordination mechanisms are necessary.
¶14. (S) U.S. participants said that political decisions, or
the delay thereof, in the run-up to a contingency should not
prevent military coordination between U.S. forces and the
JSDF. USFJ Deputy Commander Major General Flock suggested
the BCC, in some form, be active at all times and continually
staffed at some minimal level so that it is ready to be fully
stood-up at a moments notice. He also suggested that the BCM
and BCC process needs to be exercised more, especially since
most current bilateral exercises assume SIASJ or an armed
attack against Japan has already occurred.
¶15. (S) Both MOFA and MOD DDGs indicated that the is moving
toward a more ""flexible activation"" of the BCC, with DDG
Matsumoto noting that this would allow BCC activation without
the establishment of the BCM on the authority of the Japan
JSO Chief of Staff and the SUFJ Commander. (NOTE: This is
senior-level MOD confirmation of a proposal an MOD action
officer presented to USFJ and Embassy representatives the
previous week. The proposal is now under consideration at
USFJ. End note.)
¶16. (S) The Japan JSO J-3 operations representative expressed
support for having the BCC established during peacetime,
especially since Japan now has ballistic missile interceptor
capability. MOFA also noted that whether an entity called
""BCC"" exists or not during peacetime, the substantive actions
of the BCC need to occur in peacetime before a contingency
occurs. This statement drew agreeing nods from all on the
Japan side.
SIASJ Under Review
------------------
¶17. In subsequent office calls, Director General Takamizawa
and Director General Tokuchi both mentioned that the current
SIASJ law was insufficient and the MOD is currently reviewing
the legal system for SIASJ and how the law could be improved
to allow for greater flexibility and realism in a
contingency. MOD has identified several areas for
improvement and by August will choose specific areas for
further study.
¶18. (U) DASD Mahnken cleared this cable.
SCHIEFFER