

Currently released so far... 51122 / 251,287
Articles
Brazil
Sri Lanka
United Kingdom
Sweden
00. Editorial
United States
Latin America
Egypt
Jordan
Yemen
Thailand
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
2011/05/18
2011/05/19
2011/05/20
2011/05/21
2011/05/22
2011/05/23
2011/05/24
2011/05/25
2011/05/26
2011/05/27
2011/05/28
2011/05/29
2011/05/30
2011/05/31
2011/06/01
2011/06/02
2011/06/03
2011/06/04
2011/06/05
2011/06/06
2011/06/07
2011/06/08
2011/06/09
2011/06/10
2011/06/11
2011/06/12
2011/06/13
2011/06/14
2011/06/15
2011/06/16
2011/06/17
2011/06/18
2011/06/19
2011/06/20
2011/06/21
2011/06/22
2011/06/23
2011/06/24
2011/06/25
2011/06/26
2011/06/27
2011/06/28
2011/06/29
2011/06/30
2011/07/01
2011/07/02
2011/07/04
2011/07/05
2011/07/06
2011/07/07
2011/07/08
2011/07/10
2011/07/11
2011/07/12
2011/07/13
2011/07/14
2011/07/15
2011/07/16
2011/07/17
2011/07/18
2011/07/19
2011/07/20
2011/07/21
2011/07/22
2011/07/23
2011/07/25
2011/07/27
2011/07/28
2011/07/29
2011/07/31
2011/08/01
2011/08/02
2011/08/03
2011/08/05
2011/08/06
2011/08/07
2011/08/08
2011/08/09
2011/08/10
2011/08/11
2011/08/12
2011/08/13
2011/08/15
2011/08/16
2011/08/17
2011/08/18
2011/08/19
2011/08/21
2011/08/22
2011/08/23
2011/08/24
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Antananarivo
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Alexandria
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embasy Bonn
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Brazzaville
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangui
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Belfast
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Cotonou
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chiang Mai
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Chengdu
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
DIR FSINFATC
Consulate Dusseldorf
Consulate Durban
Consulate Dubai
Consulate Dhahran
Embassy Guatemala
Embassy Grenada
Embassy Georgetown
Embassy Gaborone
Consulate Guayaquil
Consulate Guangzhou
Consulate Guadalajara
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Hong Kong
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kolonia
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Krakow
Consulate Kolkata
Consulate Karachi
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Lusaka
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Lome
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy Libreville
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Leipzig
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Mission Geneva
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Mogadishu
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maseru
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Merida
Consulate Melbourne
Consulate Matamoros
Consulate Marseille
Embassy Nouakchott
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Nuevo Laredo
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Consulate Nagoya
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Praia
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Moresby
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Podgorica
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Hillah
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Surabaya
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy Tirana
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
Consulate Thessaloniki
USUN New York
USMISSION USTR GENEVA
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Mission CD Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
UN Rome
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vientiane
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AMGT
ASEC
AEMR
AR
APECO
AU
AORC
ADANA
AJ
AF
AFIN
AMED
AS
AM
ABLD
AFFAIRS
AMB
APER
ACOA
AND
AA
AE
AADP
AID
AO
AL
AG
AORD
ADM
AINF
AINT
ASEAN
AORG
ABT
APEC
AY
ASUP
ARF
AGOA
AVIAN
ATRN
ANET
AGIT
ASECVE
ABUD
AODE
ALOW
ADB
AN
ADPM
ASPA
ARABL
AFSN
AZ
AC
AIAG
AFSI
ASCE
ASIG
ACABQ
ADIP
AFGHANISTAN
AROC
ADCO
ACOTA
ANARCHISTS
AMEDCASCKFLO
AK
ARABBL
ASCH
ANTITERRORISM
AGRICULTURE
AOCR
ARR
ASSEMBLY
AORCYM
AFPK
ACKM
AGMT
AEC
APRC
AIN
AFPREL
ASFC
ASECTH
AFSA
AINR
AOPC
AFAF
AFARI
AX
ASECAF
ASECAFIN
AT
AFZAL
APCS
AGAO
AIT
ARCH
AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL
AMEX
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AORCD
AVIATION
ARAS
AINFCY
ACBAQ
AOPR
AREP
AOIC
ASEX
ASEK
AER
AGR
AMCT
AVERY
APR
AEMRS
AFU
AMG
ATPDEA
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AORL
ACS
AMCHAMS
AECL
AUC
ACAO
BA
BR
BB
BG
BEXP
BY
BRUSSELS
BU
BD
BTIO
BK
BL
BE
BMGT
BO
BM
BX
BN
BWC
BBSR
BTT
BC
BH
BILAT
BUSH
BHUM
BT
BTC
BMENA
BOND
BAIO
BP
BF
BRPA
BURNS
BUT
BBG
BCW
BOEHNER
BOL
BASHAR
BIDEN
BFIN
BZ
BEXPC
BTIU
CPAS
CA
CASC
CS
CBW
CIDA
CO
CODEL
CI
CROS
CU
CH
CWC
CMGT
CVIS
CDG
CTR
CG
CF
CHIEF
CJAN
CBSA
CE
CY
CB
CW
CM
CHR
CD
COE
CV
COUNTER
CT
CN
CPUOS
CTERR
CVR
CVPR
CDC
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CONS
COM
CACS
CR
CONTROLS
CAN
CACM
COMMERCE
CAMBODIA
CFIS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITES
CONDOLEEZZA
CZ
CTBT
CEN
CLINTON
CFED
CARC
CTM
CARICOM
CSW
CICTE
CYPRUS
CBE
CMGMT
CARSON
CWCM
CIVS
COUNTRYCLEARANCE
CENTCOM
CAPC
COPUOS
CKGR
CITEL
CQ
CITT
CIC
CARIB
CVIC
CAFTA
CVISU
CDB
CEDAW
CNC
CJUS
COMMAND
CENTER
COL
CAJC
CONSULAR
CLMT
CBC
CIA
CNARC
CIS
CEUDA
CHINA
CAC
CL
DR
DJ
DEMOCRATIC
DEMARCHE
DOMESTIC
DISENGAGEMENT
DB
DA
DHS
DAO
DCM
DAVID
DO
DEAX
DEFENSE
DEA
DTRO
DPRK
DOC
DTRA
DK
DAC
DOD
DRL
DRC
DCG
DE
DOT
DEPT
DOE
DS
DKEM
ECON
ETTC
EFIS
ETRD
EC
EMIN
EAGR
EAID
EFIN
EUN
ECIN
EG
EWWT
EINV
ENRG
ELAB
EPET
EIND
EN
EAIR
EUMEM
ECPS
ES
EI
ELTN
ET
EZ
EU
ER
EINT
ENGR
ECONOMIC
ENIV
EFTA
ETRN
EMS
EUREM
EPA
ESTH
EEB
EET
ENV
EAG
EXIM
ECTRD
ELNT
ENVIRONMENT
ECA
EAP
EINDIR
ETR
ECONOMY
ETRC
ELECTIONS
EICN
EXPORT
EARG
EGHG
EID
ETRO
EINF
EAIDHO
ECIP
EENV
EURM
EPEC
ERNG
ENERG
EIAD
EXBS
ED
EREL
ELAM
EK
EWT
ENGRD
EDEV
ECE
ENGY
EXIMOPIC
ETRDEC
ECCT
EUR
ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID
EFI
ECOSOC
EXTERNAL
ESCAP
ETCC
EENG
ERA
ENRD
ECLAC
ETRAD
EBRD
ENVR
ECONENRG
ELTNSNAR
ELAP
EPIT
EDUC
EAIDXMXAXBXFFR
EETC
EIVN
EDRC
EGOV
ETRA
EAIDRW
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ESA
ETRDGK
ENVI
ELN
EPRT
EPTED
ERTD
EUM
EAIDS
EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM
EDU
EV
EAIDAF
EDA
EPREL
EINVEFIN
EAGER
ETMIN
EUCOM
ECCP
EIDN
EINVKSCA
ENNP
EFINECONCS
ETC
EAIRASECCASCID
EINN
ETRP
ECONOMICS
ENERGY
EIAR
EINDETRD
ECONEFIN
EURN
ETRDEINVTINTCS
EFIM
ETIO
EATO
EIPR
EINVETC
ETTD
ETDR
EIQ
ECONCS
ENRGIZ
EAIG
ENTG
EUC
ERD
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECUN
FR
FI
FOREIGN
FARM
FIR
FAO
FK
FARC
FAS
FJ
FREEDOM
FAC
FINANCE
FBI
FTAA
FM
FCS
FAA
FORCE
FDA
FTA
FT
FCSC
FMGT
FINR
FIN
FDIC
FOR
FOI
FO
FMLN
FISO
GM
GERARD
GT
GA
GG
GR
GTIP
GH
GZ
GE
GB
GY
GAZA
GJ
GEORGE
GOI
GCC
GMUS
GI
GLOBAL
GV
GC
GL
GOV
GKGIC
GF
GWI
GIPNC
GUTIERREZ
GTMO
GANGS
GAERC
GUILLERMO
GASPAR
HR
HA
HYMPSK
HO
HK
HUMAN
HU
HN
HHS
HURI
HUD
HUMRIT
HUMANITARIAN
HUMANR
HL
HSTC
HILLARY
HCOPIL
HADLEY
HOURANI
HI
HUM
HEBRON
HUMOR
IZ
IN
IAEA
IS
IMO
ILO
IR
IC
IT
ITU
ID
IV
IMF
IBRD
IWC
ICAO
ICRC
INF
IO
IPR
ISO
IK
ISRAELI
IQ
ICES
IDB
INFLUENZA
IRAQI
ISCON
IGAD
IRAN
ITALY
IRAQ
ICTY
ICTR
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IQNV
IADB
INTERNAL
INMARSAT
IRDB
ILC
INCB
INRB
ICJ
ISRAEL
INR
IEA
ISPA
ICCAT
IOM
ITRD
IHO
IL
IFAD
ITRA
IDLI
ISCA
INL
INRA
INTELSAT
ISAF
ISPL
IRS
IEF
ITER
INDO
IIP
IND
IEFIN
IACI
IAHRC
INNP
IA
INTERPOL
IFIN
ISSUES
IZPREL
IRAJ
IF
ITPHUM
ITA
IP
IRPE
IDA
ISLAMISTS
ITF
INRO
IBET
IDP
IRC
KMDR
KPAO
KOMC
KNNP
KFLO
KDEM
KSUM
KIPR
KFLU
KE
KCRM
KJUS
KAWC
KZ
KSCA
KDRG
KCOR
KGHG
KPAL
KTIP
KMCA
KCRS
KPKO
KOLY
KRVC
KVPR
KG
KWBG
KTER
KS
KN
KSPR
KWMN
KV
KTFN
KFRD
KU
KSTC
KSTH
KISL
KGIC
KSEP
KFIN
KTEX
KTIA
KUNR
KCMR
KCIP
KMOC
KTDB
KBIO
KBCT
KMPI
KSAF
KACT
KFEM
KPRV
KPWR
KIRC
KCFE
KRIM
KHIV
KHLS
KVIR
KNNNP
KCEM
KLIG
KIRF
KNUP
KSAC
KNUC
KPGOV
KTDD
KIDE
KOMS
KLFU
KNNC
KMFO
KSEO
KJRE
KJUST
KMRS
KSRE
KGIT
KPIR
KPOA
KUWAIT
KIVP
KICC
KSCS
KPOL
KSEAO
KRCM
KSCI
KNAP
KGLB
KICA
KCUL
KPRM
KFSC
KQ
KPOP
KPFO
KPALAOIS
KREC
KBWG
KR
KTTB
KNAR
KCOM
KESS
KINR
KOCI
KWN
KCSY
KREL
KTBT
KFTN
KW
KRFD
KFLOA
KHDP
KNEP
KIND
KHUM
KSKN
KOMO
KDRL
KTFIN
KSOC
KPO
KGIV
KSTCPL
KSI
KPRP
KFPC
KNNB
KNDP
KICCPUR
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KDMR
KFCE
KIMMITT
KMCC
KMNP
KSEC
KOMCSG
KGCC
KRAD
KCRP
KAUST
KWAWC
KCHG
KRDP
KPAS
KTIAPARM
KPAOPREL
KWGB
KIRP
KMIG
KLAB
KSEI
KHSA
KNPP
KPAONZ
KWWW
KGHA
KY
KCRIM
KCRCM
KGCN
KPLS
KIIP
KPAOY
KTRD
KTAO
KJU
KBTS
KWAC
KFIU
KNNO
KPAI
KILS
KPA
KRCS
KWBGSY
KNPPIS
KNNPMNUC
KNPT
KERG
KLTN
KPREL
KTLA
KO
KAWK
KVRP
KAID
KX
KENV
KWCI
KNPR
KCFC
KNEI
KFTFN
KTFM
KCERS
KDEMAF
KMEPI
KEMS
KBTR
KEDU
KIRL
KNNR
KMPT
KPDD
KPIN
KDEV
KFRP
KTBD
KMSG
KWWMN
KWBC
KA
KOM
KWNM
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KRGY
KNNF
KICR
KIFR
KWMNCS
KPAK
KDDG
KCGC
KID
KNSD
KMPF
KWMM
MARR
MX
MASS
MOPS
MNUC
MCAP
MTCRE
MRCRE
MTRE
MASC
MY
MK
MG
MU
MILI
MO
MZ
MEPP
MCC
MEDIA
MOPPS
MI
MAS
MW
MP
MEPN
MV
MD
MR
MC
MCA
MT
MIL
MARITIME
MOPSGRPARM
MAAR
MOOPS
ML
MA
MN
MNUCPTEREZ
MTCR
MUNC
MPOS
MONUC
MGMT
MURRAY
MACP
MINUSTAH
MCCONNELL
MGT
MNUR
MF
MEPI
MOHAMMAD
MAR
MAPP
MNU
MFA
MTS
MLS
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MED
MNVC
MIK
MBM
MILITARY
MAPS
MARAD
MDC
MACEDONIA
MASSMNUC
MUCN
MQADHAFI
MPS
NZ
NATO
NI
NO
NU
NG
NL
NPT
NS
NA
NP
NASA
NSF
NEA
NANCY
NSG
NRR
NATIONAL
NMNUC
NC
NSC
NAS
NARC
NELSON
NATEU
NDP
NIH
NK
NIPP
NR
NERG
NSSP
NE
NTDB
NT
NEGROPONTE
NGO
NATOIRAQ
NAR
NZUS
NCCC
NH
NAFTA
NEW
NRG
NUIN
NOVO
NATOPREL
NV
NICHOLAS
NPA
NSFO
NW
NORAD
NPG
NOAA
OPRC
OPDC
OTRA
OECD
OVIP
OREP
ODC
OIIP
OAS
OSCE
OPIC
OMS
OFDP
OFDA
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OSCI
OM
OPAD
ODPC
OIC
ODIP
OPPI
ORA
OCEA
OREG
OMIG
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXP
OPEC
OFPD
OAU
OCII
OIL
OVIPPRELUNGANU
OSHA
OPCD
OPCR
OF
OFDPQIS
OSIC
OHUM
OTR
OBSP
OGAC
OESC
OVP
ON
OES
OTAR
OCS
PREL
PGOV
PARM
PINR
PHUM
PM
PREF
PTER
PK
PINS
PBIO
PHSA
PE
PBTS
PA
PL
POL
PAK
POV
POLITICS
POLICY
PO
PRELTBIOBA
PKO
PIN
PNAT
PU
PGOVPREL
PALESTINIAN
PTERPGOV
PELOSI
PAS
PP
PTEL
PROP
PRELAF
PRHUM
PRE
PUNE
PIRF
PVOV
PROG
PERSONS
PROV
PKK
PRGOV
PH
PLAB
PDEM
PCI
PRL
PRM
PINSO
PERM
PETR
PPAO
PERL
PBS
PETERS
PRELBR
PCON
POLITICAL
PMIL
POLM
PKPA
PNUM
PLO
PTERM
PJUS
PARMP
PNIR
PHUMKPAL
PG
PREZ
PGIC
PAO
PROTECTION
PRELPK
PGOVENRG
PATTY
PSOC
PARTIES
PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ
PMIG
PAIGH
PARK
PETER
PHUS
PKPO
PGOVECON
POUS
PMAR
PWBG
PAR
PGOVGM
PHUH
PTE
PY
POLUN
PDOV
PGOVSOCI
PGOVPM
PRELEVU
PGOR
PBTSRU
PHUMA
PHUMR
PPD
PGV
PRAM
PARMS
PINL
PSI
PKPAL
PPA
PTERE
PGOF
PINO
PREO
PHAS
PAC
PRESL
PORG
PS
PGVO
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PINT
PRELP
PREFA
PNG
PTBS
PFOR
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PREK
PHJM
POLINT
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PECON
PEACE
PROCESS
PLN
PEDRO
PF
PGPV
PCUL
PGGV
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGIV
PHUMPREL
POGOV
PEL
PBT
PAMQ
PINF
PSEPC
POSTS
PAHO
PHUMPGOV
PGOC
PNR
RS
RP
RU
RW
RFE
RCMP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
REFORM
RO
ROW
ROBERT
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RELATIONS
RAY
ROBERTG
RIGHTS
RM
RATIFICATION
RREL
RBI
RICE
ROOD
REL
RODHAM
RGY
RUEHZO
RELIGIOUS
RELFREE
RUEUN
RELAM
RSP
RF
REO
REGIONAL
RUPREL
RI
REMON
RPEL
RSO
SCUL
SENV
SOCI
SZ
SNAR
SO
SP
SU
SY
SI
SMIG
SYR
SA
SW
SF
SR
SYRIA
SNARM
START
SPECIALIST
SG
SNIG
SCI
SGWI
SE
SIPDIS
SANC
SELAB
SN
SETTLEMENTS
SCIENCE
SENVENV
SENS
SPCE
SPAS
SECURITY
SENC
SOCIETY
SOSI
SENVEAGREAIDTBIOECONSOCIXR
SEN
SPECI
ST
SL
SENVCASCEAIDID
SC
SECRETARY
STR
SNA
SOCIS
SADC
SEP
SK
SHUM
SYAI
SMIL
STEPHEN
SNRV
SKCA
SENSITIVE
SECI
SCUD
SCRM
SGNV
SECTOR
SAARC
SENVSXE
SWMN
STEINBERG
SOPN
SOCR
SCRS
SWE
SARS
SNARIZ
SUDAN
SENVQGR
SAN
SM
SFNV
SSA
SPCVIS
SOFA
SCULKPAOECONTU
SENVKGHG
SHI
SEVN
SH
SNARCS
SNARN
SIPRS
TBIO
TW
TRGY
TSPA
TU
TPHY
TI
TX
TH
TIP
TSPL
TNGD
TZ
TS
TC
TK
TURKEY
TERRORISM
TPSL
TINT
TRSY
TERFIN
TPP
TT
TECHNOLOGY
TE
TAGS
TRAFFICKING
TJ
TN
TO
TD
TP
TREATY
TR
TA
TIO
TECH
TF
TRAD
TNDG
TWI
TPSA
TWL
TAUSCHER
TRBY
TL
TV
THPY
TSPAM
TREL
TRT
TNAR
TFIN
TWCH
THOMMA
THOMAS
TERROR
TRY
TBID
UK
UNESCO
UNSC
UNGA
UN
US
UZ
USEU
UG
UP
UNAUS
UNMIK
USTR
UY
USUN
UNEP
UNDC
UV
UNPUOS
UNSCR
USAID
UNODC
UNRCR
UNHCR
UNDP
UNCRIME
UA
UNHRC
UNRWA
UNO
UNCND
UNCHR
USAU
UNICEF
USPS
UNOMIG
UNESCOSCULPRELPHUMKPALCUIRXFVEKV
UR
UNFICYP
UNCITRAL
UNAMA
UNVIE
USTDA
USNC
UNCSD
USCC
UNEF
UNGAPL
USSC
UNMIC
UNTAC
UNCLASSIFIED
USDA
UNCTAD
USGS
UNFPA
UNSE
USOAS
UE
UAE
UNCHS
UNDESCO
UNC
UNSCS
UKXG
UNGACG
UNHR
UNBRO
UNCHC
UNFCYP
UNIDROIT
WHTI
WIPO
WTRO
WHO
WTO
WMO
WFP
WEET
WS
WE
WA
WHA
WBG
WILLIAM
WI
WSIS
WCL
WEBZ
WZ
WW
WWBG
WMD
WWT
WMN
WWARD
WITH
WTRQ
WCO
WEU
WB
WBEG
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 08OTTAWA274,
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08OTTAWA274.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
08OTTAWA274 | 2008-02-22 20:07 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Ottawa |
VZCZCXRO8921
RR RUEHGA RUEHHA RUEHQU RUEHVC
DE RUEHOT #0274/01 0532007
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 222007Z FEB 08 ZFR
FM AMEMBASSY OTTAWA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 7352
INFO RHEHAAA/WHITEHOUSE WASHDC
RUEAHLC/DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITY WASHDC
RHEBAAA/DOE WASHDC
RUCNCAN/ALL CANADIAN POSTS COLLECTIVE
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 29 OTTAWA 000274
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
STATE FOR S/CT (Robertson), WHA/CAN (Fox)
WHITEHOUSE FOR HSC
DHS for International Affairs
DHS FOR INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION
DOE FOR P&I
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ASEC ECON PTER PREL PGOV ETTC EAID EAGR EFIN KHLS
CA
SUBJ: CI/KR Response for S/CT: Canada's Critical Infrastructure
(CI) and Key Resources (KR)
OTTAWA 00000274 001.2 OF 029
ZFR/////////////ZFR//////////////ZFR///////// ///////ZFR///////ZFR
PLEASE CANCEL OTTAWA 274 IMI OTTAWA 274. CABLE HAS BEEN RE-SENT
WITH NEW NUMBERS.
SORRY FOR ANY INCONVENIENCE.
ZFR///////////ZFR///////////////ZFR////////// ///////ZFR///////ZFR
OTTAWA 00000274 002 OF 029
¶1. Summary: The economies, societies and environments of Canada and
the United States are inextricably intertwined; the relationship is
most easily reflected in the staggering volume of bilateral trade --
over US$1.5 billion a day in goods - and the 300,000 people who
cross the shared border every day to work or visit. Moreover,
Canada is the single largest foreign supplier of fossil fuels to the
United States (providing 17 percent of U.S. oil imports and over 80
percent of U.S. natural gas imports). Our food and agriculture
markets are almost completely integrated, with Canada accounting for
about 20 percent of total US agri-food imports. In addition our two
countries' financial markets and telecommunications and electrical
networks are highly interconnected. As a consequence of this
exceptional interrelationship a disruption to Canada's critical
infrastructure (CI) could have an immediate and deleterious impact
on the United States. Because it would be virtually impossible to
provide an exhaustive accounting of Canada's CI, this cable gives
illustrative examples of CI in various sectors. Protection of CI is
a Canadian national priority, and Canada is a close and trusted
partner with the United States in working to protect CI in North
America. End summary.
Canada's Approach to CI
¶2. Like the United States, Canada's critical infrastructure consists
of physical and information technology facilities, networks,
services and assets essential to the health, safety, security or
economic well-being of its citizens, or to the effective functioning
of government. In many respects, the two countries should be viewed
as sharing the same infrastructure (pipelines, bridges, power and
phone lines) sprawling across a shared economic space. As in the
United States, it is estimated that most (between 85 and 95
percent)of Canada's critical infrastructure is owned and operated by
private sector firms, which therefore bear primary responsibility
for the development and implementation of business continuity plans.
In addition to the federal government's role, the provinces and
territories also have a significant jurisdictional role in critical
infrastructure protection and emergency management. These
government entities also own and regulate some critical
infrastructure.
¶3. Canada has established the National Critical Infrastructure
Assurance Program (NCIAP) - an ongoing collaboration between private
sector partners and federal, provincial and territorial governments
- to provide a national framework for cooperative action and to
build a resilient national critical infrastructure. The federal
government classifies critical infrastructure within ten sectors, as
opposed to the USG classification system of 17 critical
infrastructure/key resources sectors.
¶4. The 10 Canadian sectors are:
* Energy and Utilities (e.g., electrical power, natural gas, oil
production/transmission)
* Information and Communications Technology (e.g.,
telecommunications, broadcasting systems, software, hardware, and
networks including the Internet)
* Finance (e.g., large-value payment, securities clearing and
settlement systems)
* Health Care (e.g., hospitals, blood-supply facilities and
pharmaceutical manufacturers)
* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
Q* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
* Water (e.g., drinking water and wastewater management)
* Transportation (e.g., road, rail, marine, and aviation)
* Safety (e.g., chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear
safety, dangerous goods, search and rescue, emergency services and
dams)
* Government (e.g., services, facilities, information networks and
key national monuments)
* Manufacturing (e.g., defense industrial base, chemical industry)
Cooperation with the United States
¶5. At the federal government level, the Public Safety Canada is
responsible for national CI policy. Public Safety Canada works
primarily with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
(particularly with the Office of Critical Infrastructure Protection)
on the identification of shared CI, threat analysis and response
planning; since 2005, under the auspices of the SPP. We understand
that Public Safety Canada and DHS have recently collaborated on a
detailed threat analysis of shared CI. Post would welcome a copy.
Examples of Canadian Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources with
Potentially Significant U.S. Impact (USG Categories)
Toronto would be felt instantly on U.S. markets.
¶B. (SBU) Chemical & Hazardous Materials - Canada's main
petrochemical complex is at Sarnia, Ontario, opposite Port Huron,
Michigan, where major oil and gas pipelines from western Canada
terminate. Sarnia and Port Huron are both relatively small towns
OTTAWA 00000274 003 OF 029
¶1. Summary: The economies, societies and environments of Canada and
the United States are inextricably intertwined; the relationship is
most easily reflected in the staggering volume of bilateral trade --
over US$1.5 billion a day in goods - and the 300,000 people who
cross the shared border every day to work or visit. Moreover,
Canada is the single largest foreign supplier of fossil fuels to the
United States (providing 17 percent of U.S. oil imports and over 80
percent of U.S. natural gas imports). Our food and agriculture
markets are almost completely integrated, with Canada accounting for
about 20 percent of total US agri-food imports. In addition our two
countries' financial markets and telecommunications and electrical
networks are highly interconnected. As a consequence of this
exceptional interrelationship a disruption to Canada's critical
infrastructure (CI) could have an immediate and deleterious impact
on the United States. Because it would be virtually impossible to
provide an exhaustive accounting of Canada's CI, this cable gives
illustrative examples of CI in various sectors. Protection of CI is
a Canadian national priority, and Canada is a close and trusted
partner with the United States in working to protect CI in North
America. End summary.
Canada's Approach to CI
¶2. Like the United States, Canada's critical infrastructure consists
of physical and information technology facilities, networks,
services and assets essential to the health, safety, security or
economic well-being of its citizens, or to the effective functioning
of government. In many respects, the two countries should be viewed
as sharing the same infrastructure (pipelines, bridges, power and
phone lines) sprawling across a shared economic space. As in the
United States, it is estimated that most (between 85 and 95
percent)of Canada's critical infrastructure is owned and operated by
private sector firms, which therefore bear primary responsibility
for the development and implementation of business continuity plans.
In addition to the federal government's role, the provinces and
territories also have a significant jurisdictional role in critical
infrastructure protection and emergency management. These
government entities also own and regulate some critical
infrastructure.
¶3. Canada has established the National Critical Infrastructure
Assurance Program (NCIAP) - an ongoing collaboration between private
sector partners and federal, provincial and territorial governments
- to provide a national framework for cooperative action and to
build a resilient national critical infrastructure. The federal
government classifies critical infrastructure within ten sectors, as
opposed to the USG classification system of 17 critical
infrastructure/key resources sectors.
¶4. The 10 Canadian sectors are:
* Energy and Utilities (e.g., electrical power, natural gas, oil
production/transmission)
* Information and Communications Technology (e.g.,
telecommunications, broadcasting systems, software, hardware, and
networks including the Internet)
* Finance (e.g., large-value payment, securities clearing and
settlement systems)
* Health Care (e.g., hospitals, blood-supply facilities and
pharmaceutical manufacturers)
* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
Q* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
* Water (e.g., drinking water and wastewater management)
* Transportation (e.g., road, rail, marine, and aviation)
* Safety (e.g., chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear
safety, dangerous goods, search and rescue, emergency services and
dams)
* Government (e.g., services, facilities, information networks and
key national monuments)
* Manufacturing (e.g., defense industrial base, chemical industry)
Cooperation with the United States
¶5. At the federal government level, the Public Safety Canada is
responsible for national CI policy. Public Safety Canada works
primarily with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
(particularly with the Office of Critical Infrastructure Protection)
on the identification of shared CI, threat analysis and response
planning; since 2005, under the auspices of the SPP. We understand
that Public Safety Canada and DHS have recently collaborated on a
detailed threat analysis of shared CI. Post would welcome a copy.
Examples of Canadian Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources with
Potentially Significant U.S. Impact (USG Categories)
and they share resources, such as chemical spill response teams, in
emergencies. Also, Canada is the world's largest single producer of
uranium, accounting for about one-third of the world's uranium mine
output. Cameco's refinery at Blind River, Ontario takes uranium
oxide concentrate (U3O8) from mines in Canada and abroad and refines
it to UO3, an intermediate product. The UO3 is trucked to Port Hope,
OTTAWA 00000274 004 OF 029
¶1. Summary: The economies, societies and environments of Canada and
the United States are inextricably intertwined; the relationship is
most easily reflected in the staggering volume of bilateral trade --
over US$1.5 billion a day in goods - and the 300,000 people who
cross the shared border every day to work or visit. Moreover,
Canada is the single largest foreign supplier of fossil fuels to the
United States (providing 17 percent of U.S. oil imports and over 80
percent of U.S. natural gas imports). Our food and agriculture
markets are almost completely integrated, with Canada accounting for
about 20 percent of total US agri-food imports. In addition our two
countries' financial markets and telecommunications and electrical
networks are highly interconnected. As a consequence of this
exceptional interrelationship a disruption to Canada's critical
infrastructure (CI) could have an immediate and deleterious impact
on the United States. Because it would be virtually impossible to
provide an exhaustive accounting of Canada's CI, this cable gives
illustrative examples of CI in various sectors. Protection of CI is
a Canadian national priority, and Canada is a close and trusted
partner with the United States in working to protect CI in North
America. End summary.
Canada's Approach to CI
¶2. Like the United States, Canada's critical infrastructure consists
of physical and information technology facilities, networks,
services and assets essential to the health, safety, security or
economic well-being of its citizens, or to the effective functioning
of government. In many respects, the two countries should be viewed
as sharing the same infrastructure (pipelines, bridges, power and
phone lines) sprawling across a shared economic space. As in the
United States, it is estimated that most (between 85 and 95
percent)of Canada's critical infrastructure is owned and operated by
private sector firms, which therefore bear primary responsibility
for the development and implementation of business continuity plans.
In addition to the federal government's role, the provinces and
territories also have a significant jurisdictional role in critical
infrastructure protection and emergency management. These
government entities also own and regulate some critical
infrastructure.
¶3. Canada has established the National Critical Infrastructure
Assurance Program (NCIAP) - an ongoing collaboration between private
sector partners and federal, provincial and territorial governments
- to provide a national framework for cooperative action and to
build a resilient national critical infrastructure. The federal
government classifies critical infrastructure within ten sectors, as
opposed to the USG classification system of 17 critical
infrastructure/key resources sectors.
¶4. The 10 Canadian sectors are:
* Energy and Utilities (e.g., electrical power, natural gas, oil
production/transmission)
* Information and Communications Technology (e.g.,
telecommunications, broadcasting systems, software, hardware, and
networks including the Internet)
* Finance (e.g., large-value payment, securities clearing and
settlement systems)
* Health Care (e.g., hospitals, blood-supply facilities and
pharmaceutical manufacturers)
* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
Q* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
* Water (e.g., drinking water and wastewater management)
* Transportation (e.g., road, rail, marine, and aviation)
* Safety (e.g., chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear
safety, dangerous goods, search and rescue, emergency services and
dams)
* Government (e.g., services, facilities, information networks and
key national monuments)
* Manufacturing (e.g., defense industrial base, chemical industry)
Cooperation with the United States
¶5. At the federal government level, the Public Safety Canada is
responsible for national CI policy. Public Safety Canada works
primarily with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
(particularly with the Office of Critical Infrastructure Protection)
on the identification of shared CI, threat analysis and response
planning; since 2005, under the auspices of the SPP. We understand
that Public Safety Canada and DHS have recently collaborated on a
detailed threat analysis of shared CI. Post would welcome a copy.
Examples of Canadian Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources with
Potentially Significant U.S. Impact (USG Categories)
Ontario (on the shores of Lake Ontario) where Cameco has about
one-quarter of the Western world's uranium hexafluoride (UF6)
conversion capacity - 12,400 metric tons per year. The uranium
hexafluoride is then shipped outside Canada for enrichment
(including in the United States) for use in light water reactors.
Disruption of uranium mining activities in Saskatchewan or the
OTTAWA 00000274 005 OF 029
¶1. Summary: The economies, societies and environments of Canada and
the United States are inextricably intertwined; the relationship is
most easily reflected in the staggering volume of bilateral trade --
over US$1.5 billion a day in goods - and the 300,000 people who
cross the shared border every day to work or visit. Moreover,
Canada is the single largest foreign supplier of fossil fuels to the
United States (providing 17 percent of U.S. oil imports and over 80
percent of U.S. natural gas imports). Our food and agriculture
markets are almost completely integrated, with Canada accounting for
about 20 percent of total US agri-food imports. In addition our two
countries' financial markets and telecommunications and electrical
networks are highly interconnected. As a consequence of this
exceptional interrelationship a disruption to Canada's critical
infrastructure (CI) could have an immediate and deleterious impact
on the United States. Because it would be virtually impossible to
provide an exhaustive accounting of Canada's CI, this cable gives
illustrative examples of CI in various sectors. Protection of CI is
a Canadian national priority, and Canada is a close and trusted
partner with the United States in working to protect CI in North
America. End summary.
Canada's Approach to CI
¶2. Like the United States, Canada's critical infrastructure consists
of physical and information technology facilities, networks,
services and assets essential to the health, safety, security or
economic well-being of its citizens, or to the effective functioning
of government. In many respects, the two countries should be viewed
as sharing the same infrastructure (pipelines, bridges, power and
phone lines) sprawling across a shared economic space. As in the
United States, it is estimated that most (between 85 and 95
percent)of Canada's critical infrastructure is owned and operated by
private sector firms, which therefore bear primary responsibility
for the development and implementation of business continuity plans.
In addition to the federal government's role, the provinces and
territories also have a significant jurisdictional role in critical
infrastructure protection and emergency management. These
government entities also own and regulate some critical
infrastructure.
¶3. Canada has established the National Critical Infrastructure
Assurance Program (NCIAP) - an ongoing collaboration between private
sector partners and federal, provincial and territorial governments
- to provide a national framework for cooperative action and to
build a resilient national critical infrastructure. The federal
government classifies critical infrastructure within ten sectors, as
opposed to the USG classification system of 17 critical
infrastructure/key resources sectors.
¶4. The 10 Canadian sectors are:
* Energy and Utilities (e.g., electrical power, natural gas, oil
production/transmission)
* Information and Communications Technology (e.g.,
telecommunications, broadcasting systems, software, hardware, and
networks including the Internet)
* Finance (e.g., large-value payment, securities clearing and
settlement systems)
* Health Care (e.g., hospitals, blood-supply facilities and
pharmaceutical manufacturers)
* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
Q* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
* Water (e.g., drinking water and wastewater management)
* Transportation (e.g., road, rail, marine, and aviation)
* Safety (e.g., chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear
safety, dangerous goods, search and rescue, emergency services and
dams)
* Government (e.g., services, facilities, information networks and
key national monuments)
* Manufacturing (e.g., defense industrial base, chemical industry)
Cooperation with the United States
¶5. At the federal government level, the Public Safety Canada is
responsible for national CI policy. Public Safety Canada works
primarily with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
(particularly with the Office of Critical Infrastructure Protection)
on the identification of shared CI, threat analysis and response
planning; since 2005, under the auspices of the SPP. We understand
that Public Safety Canada and DHS have recently collaborated on a
detailed threat analysis of shared CI. Post would welcome a copy.
Examples of Canadian Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources with
Potentially Significant U.S. Impact (USG Categories)
milling and conversion facilities in Ontario could impact fuel
supply for American nuclear power plants. Destruction, disruption
or exploitation of the Port Hope plant could lead to radiological
contamination of American territory in New York state.
¶C. (SBU) Defense Industrial Base - The "Stryker" armored vehicle for
OTTAWA 00000274 006 OF 029
¶1. Summary: The economies, societies and environments of Canada and
the United States are inextricably intertwined; the relationship is
most easily reflected in the staggering volume of bilateral trade --
over US$1.5 billion a day in goods - and the 300,000 people who
cross the shared border every day to work or visit. Moreover,
Canada is the single largest foreign supplier of fossil fuels to the
United States (providing 17 percent of U.S. oil imports and over 80
percent of U.S. natural gas imports). Our food and agriculture
markets are almost completely integrated, with Canada accounting for
about 20 percent of total US agri-food imports. In addition our two
countries' financial markets and telecommunications and electrical
networks are highly interconnected. As a consequence of this
exceptional interrelationship a disruption to Canada's critical
infrastructure (CI) could have an immediate and deleterious impact
on the United States. Because it would be virtually impossible to
provide an exhaustive accounting of Canada's CI, this cable gives
illustrative examples of CI in various sectors. Protection of CI is
a Canadian national priority, and Canada is a close and trusted
partner with the United States in working to protect CI in North
America. End summary.
Canada's Approach to CI
¶2. Like the United States, Canada's critical infrastructure consists
of physical and information technology facilities, networks,
services and assets essential to the health, safety, security or
economic well-being of its citizens, or to the effective functioning
of government. In many respects, the two countries should be viewed
as sharing the same infrastructure (pipelines, bridges, power and
phone lines) sprawling across a shared economic space. As in the
United States, it is estimated that most (between 85 and 95
percent)of Canada's critical infrastructure is owned and operated by
private sector firms, which therefore bear primary responsibility
for the development and implementation of business continuity plans.
In addition to the federal government's role, the provinces and
territories also have a significant jurisdictional role in critical
infrastructure protection and emergency management. These
government entities also own and regulate some critical
infrastructure.
¶3. Canada has established the National Critical Infrastructure
Assurance Program (NCIAP) - an ongoing collaboration between private
sector partners and federal, provincial and territorial governments
- to provide a national framework for cooperative action and to
build a resilient national critical infrastructure. The federal
government classifies critical infrastructure within ten sectors, as
opposed to the USG classification system of 17 critical
infrastructure/key resources sectors.
¶4. The 10 Canadian sectors are:
* Energy and Utilities (e.g., electrical power, natural gas, oil
production/transmission)
* Information and Communications Technology (e.g.,
telecommunications, broadcasting systems, software, hardware, and
networks including the Internet)
* Finance (e.g., large-value payment, securities clearing and
settlement systems)
* Health Care (e.g., hospitals, blood-supply facilities and
pharmaceutical manufacturers)
* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
Q* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
* Water (e.g., drinking water and wastewater management)
* Transportation (e.g., road, rail, marine, and aviation)
* Safety (e.g., chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear
safety, dangerous goods, search and rescue, emergency services and
dams)
* Government (e.g., services, facilities, information networks and
key national monuments)
* Manufacturing (e.g., defense industrial base, chemical industry)
Cooperation with the United States
¶5. At the federal government level, the Public Safety Canada is
responsible for national CI policy. Public Safety Canada works
primarily with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
(particularly with the Office of Critical Infrastructure Protection)
on the identification of shared CI, threat analysis and response
planning; since 2005, under the auspices of the SPP. We understand
that Public Safety Canada and DHS have recently collaborated on a
detailed threat analysis of shared CI. Post would welcome a copy.
Examples of Canadian Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources with
Potentially Significant U.S. Impact (USG Categories)
the U.S. Army is built by General Dynamics; the structure,
fabrication and final assembly of the "Stryker" takes place in
London, Ontario (and also at Anniston, Alabama). Disruption at the
Ontario plant would impact acquisition and deployment of the
"Stryker."
OTTAWA 00000274 007 OF 029
¶1. Summary: The economies, societies and environments of Canada and
the United States are inextricably intertwined; the relationship is
most easily reflected in the staggering volume of bilateral trade --
over US$1.5 billion a day in goods - and the 300,000 people who
cross the shared border every day to work or visit. Moreover,
Canada is the single largest foreign supplier of fossil fuels to the
United States (providing 17 percent of U.S. oil imports and over 80
percent of U.S. natural gas imports). Our food and agriculture
markets are almost completely integrated, with Canada accounting for
about 20 percent of total US agri-food imports. In addition our two
countries' financial markets and telecommunications and electrical
networks are highly interconnected. As a consequence of this
exceptional interrelationship a disruption to Canada's critical
infrastructure (CI) could have an immediate and deleterious impact
on the United States. Because it would be virtually impossible to
provide an exhaustive accounting of Canada's CI, this cable gives
illustrative examples of CI in various sectors. Protection of CI is
a Canadian national priority, and Canada is a close and trusted
partner with the United States in working to protect CI in North
America. End summary.
Canada's Approach to CI
¶2. Like the United States, Canada's critical infrastructure consists
of physical and information technology facilities, networks,
services and assets essential to the health, safety, security or
economic well-being of its citizens, or to the effective functioning
of government. In many respects, the two countries should be viewed
as sharing the same infrastructure (pipelines, bridges, power and
phone lines) sprawling across a shared economic space. As in the
United States, it is estimated that most (between 85 and 95
percent)of Canada's critical infrastructure is owned and operated by
private sector firms, which therefore bear primary responsibility
for the development and implementation of business continuity plans.
In addition to the federal government's role, the provinces and
territories also have a significant jurisdictional role in critical
infrastructure protection and emergency management. These
government entities also own and regulate some critical
infrastructure.
¶3. Canada has established the National Critical Infrastructure
Assurance Program (NCIAP) - an ongoing collaboration between private
sector partners and federal, provincial and territorial governments
- to provide a national framework for cooperative action and to
build a resilient national critical infrastructure. The federal
government classifies critical infrastructure within ten sectors, as
opposed to the USG classification system of 17 critical
infrastructure/key resources sectors.
¶4. The 10 Canadian sectors are:
* Energy and Utilities (e.g., electrical power, natural gas, oil
production/transmission)
* Information and Communications Technology (e.g.,
telecommunications, broadcasting systems, software, hardware, and
networks including the Internet)
* Finance (e.g., large-value payment, securities clearing and
settlement systems)
* Health Care (e.g., hospitals, blood-supply facilities and
pharmaceutical manufacturers)
* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
Q* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
* Water (e.g., drinking water and wastewater management)
* Transportation (e.g., road, rail, marine, and aviation)
* Safety (e.g., chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear
safety, dangerous goods, search and rescue, emergency services and
dams)
* Government (e.g., services, facilities, information networks and
key national monuments)
* Manufacturing (e.g., defense industrial base, chemical industry)
Cooperation with the United States
¶5. At the federal government level, the Public Safety Canada is
responsible for national CI policy. Public Safety Canada works
primarily with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
(particularly with the Office of Critical Infrastructure Protection)
on the identification of shared CI, threat analysis and response
planning; since 2005, under the auspices of the SPP. We understand
that Public Safety Canada and DHS have recently collaborated on a
detailed threat analysis of shared CI. Post would welcome a copy.
Examples of Canadian Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources with
Potentially Significant U.S. Impact (USG Categories)
¶D. (SBU) Emergency Services - Response plans exist at the federal,
state/provincial and local levels to deal with cross-border
emergency response. For example, The Joint Inland Pollution
Contingency Plan is aimed at developing a coordinated and integrated
response between Canadian and United States governments to pollution
incidents and Mutual Aid pacts exist at the local level between
OTTAWA 00000274 008 OF 029
¶1. Summary: The economies, societies and environments of Canada and
the United States are inextricably intertwined; the relationship is
most easily reflected in the staggering volume of bilateral trade --
over US$1.5 billion a day in goods - and the 300,000 people who
cross the shared border every day to work or visit. Moreover,
Canada is the single largest foreign supplier of fossil fuels to the
United States (providing 17 percent of U.S. oil imports and over 80
percent of U.S. natural gas imports). Our food and agriculture
markets are almost completely integrated, with Canada accounting for
about 20 percent of total US agri-food imports. In addition our two
countries' financial markets and telecommunications and electrical
networks are highly interconnected. As a consequence of this
exceptional interrelationship a disruption to Canada's critical
infrastructure (CI) could have an immediate and deleterious impact
on the United States. Because it would be virtually impossible to
provide an exhaustive accounting of Qnada's CI, this cable gives
illustrative examples of CI in various sectors. Protection of CI is
a Canadian national priority, and Canada is a close and trusted
partner with the United States in working to protect CI in North
America. End summary.
Canada's Approach to CI
¶2. Like the United States, Canada's critical infrastructure consists
of physical and information technology facilities, networks,
services and assets essential to the health, safety, security or
economic well-being of its citizens, or to the effective functioning
of government. In many respects, the two countries should be viewed
as sharing the same infrastructure (pipelines, bridges, power and
phone lines) sprawling across a shared economic space. As in the
United States, it is estimated that most (between 85 and 95
percent)of Canada's critical infrastructure is owned and operated by
private sector firms, which therefore bear primary responsibility
for the development and implementation of business continuity plans.
In addition to the federal government's role, the provinces and
territories also have a significant jurisdictional role in critical
infrastructure protection and emergency management. These
government entities also own and regulate some critical
infrastructure.
¶3. Canada has established the National Critical Infrastructure
Assurance Program (NCIAP) - an ongoing collaboration between private
sector partners and federal, provincial and territorial governments
- to provide a national framework for cooperative action and to
build a resilient national critical infrastructure. The federal
government classifies critical infrastructure within ten sectors, as
opposed to the USG classification system of 17 critical
infrastructure/key resources sectors.
¶4. The 10 Canadian sectors are:
* Energy and Utilities (e.g., electrical power, natural gas, oil
production/transmission)
* Information and Communications Technology (e.g.,
telecommunications, broadcasting systems, software, hardware, and
networks including the Internet)
* Finance (e.g., large-value payment, securities clearing and
settlement systems)
* Health Care (e.g., hospitals, blood-supply facilities and
pharmaceutical manufacturers)
* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
Q* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
* Water (e.g., drinking water and wastewater management)
* Transportation (e.g., road, rail, marine, and aviation)
* Safety (e.g., chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear
safety, dangerous goods, search and rescue, emergency services and
dams)
* Government (e.g., services, facilities, information networks and
key national monuments)
* Manufacturing (e.g., defense industrial base, chemical industry)
Cooperation with the United States
¶5. At the federal government level, the Public Safety Canada is
responsible for national CI policy. Public Safety Canada works
primarily with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
(particularly with the Office of Critical Infrastructure Protection)
on the identification of shared CI, threat analysis and response
planning; since 2005, under the auspices of the SPP. We understand
that Public Safety Canada and DHS have recently collaborated on a
detailed threat analysis of shared CI. Post would welcome a copy.
Examples of Canadian Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources with
Potentially Significant U.S. Impact (USG Categories)
towns in the U.S. and in Canada, as in Port Huron - Sarnia (see B
above). Were these cross-border services disrupted, adequate
emergency response might be otherwise unavailable.
¶E. (SBU) Energy - Canada is the largest source of U.S. imports of
oil, natural gas, electricity and uranium; the United States exports
OTTAWA 00000274 009 OF 029
¶1. Summary: The economies, societies and environments of Canada and
the United States are inextricably intertwined; the relationship is
most easily reflected in the staggering volume of bilateral trade --
over US$1.5 billion a day in goods - and the 300,000 people who
cross the shared border every day to work or visit. Moreover,
Canada is the single largest foreign supplier of fossil fuels to the
United States (providing 17 percent of U.S. oil imports and over 80
percent of U.S. natural gas imports). Our food and agriculture
markets are almost completely integrated, with Canada accounting for
about 20 percent of total US agri-food imports. In addition our two
countries' financial markets and telecommunications and electrical
networks are highly interconnected. As a consequence of this
exceptional interrelationship a disruption to Canada's critical
infrastructure (CI) could have an immediate and deleterious impact
on the United States. Because it would be virtually impossible to
provide an exhaustive accounting of Canada's CI, this cable gives
illustrative examples of CI in various sectors. Protection of CI is
a Canadian national priority, and Canada is a close and trusted
partner with the United States in working to protect CI in North
America. End summary.
Canada's Approach to CI
¶2. Like the United States, Canada's critical infrastructure consists
of physical and information technology facilities, networks,
services and assets essential to the health, safety, security or
economic well-being of its citizens, or to the effective functioning
of government. In many respects, the two countries should be viewed
as sharing the same infrastructure (pipelines, bridges, power and
phone lines) sprawling across a shared economic space. As in the
United States, it is estimated that most (between 85 and 95
percent)of Canada's critical infrastructure is owned and operated by
private sector firms, which therefore bear primary responsibility
for the development and implementation of business continuity plans.
In addition to the federal government's role, the provinces and
territories also have a significant jurisdictional role in critical
infrastructure protection and emergency management. These
government entities also own and regulate some critical
infrastructure.
¶3. Canada has established the National Critical Infrastructure
Assurance Program (NCIAP) - an ongoing collaboration between private
sector partners and federal, provincial and territorial governments
- to provide a national framework for cooperative action and to
build a resilient national critical infrastructure. The federal
government classifies critical infrastructure within ten sectors, as
opposed to the USG classification system of 17 critical
infrastructure/key resources sectors.
¶4. The 10 Canadian sectors are:
* Energy and Utilities (e.g., electrical power, natural gas, oil
production/transmission)
* Information and Communications Technology (e.g.,
telecommunications, broadcasting systems, software, hardware, and
networks including the Internet)
* Finance (e.g., large-value payment, securities clearing and
settlement systems)
* Health Care (e.g., hospitals, blood-supply facilities and
pharmaceutical manufacturers)
* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
Q* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
* Water (e.g., drinking water and wastewater management)
* Transportation (e.g., road, rail, marine, and aviation)
* Safety (e.g., chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear
safety, dangerous goods, search and rescue, emergency services and
dams)
* Government (e.g., services, facilities, information networks and
key national monuments)
* Manufacturing (e.g., defense industrial base, chemical industry)
Cooperation with the United States
¶5. At the federal government level, the Public Safety Canada is
responsible for national CI policy. Public Safety Canada works
primarily with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
(particularly with the Office of Critical Infrastructure Protection)
on the identification of shared CI, threat analysis and response
planning; since 2005, under the auspices of the SPP. We understand
that Public Safety Canada and DHS have recently collaborated on a
detailed threat analysis of shared CI. Post would welcome a copy.
Examples of Canadian Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources with
Potentially Significant U.S. Impact (USG Categories)
electricity, coal and petroleum products to Canada. This energy
trade is carried by a shared web of oil and gas pipelines, and our
interconnected electricity grid. On the Canadian side of the
border, the private sector owns over 85 per cent of the energy
infrastructure. Our interdependent relationship was highlighted
dramatically in August, 2003, when approximately 50 million people
OTTAWA 00000274 010 OF 029
¶1. Summary: The economies, societies and environments of Canada and
the United States are inextricably intertwined; the relationship is
most easily reflected in the staggering volume of bilateral trade --
over US$1.5 billion a day in goods - and the 300,000 people who
cross the shared border every day to work or visit. Moreover,
Canada is the single largest foreign supplier of fossil fuels to the
United States (providing 17 percent of U.S. oil imports and over 80
percent of U.S. natural gas imports). Our food and agriculture
markets are almost completely integrated, with Canada accounting for
about 20 percent of total US agri-food imports. In addition our two
countries' financial markets and telecommunications and electrical
networks are highly interconnected. As a consequence of this
exceptional interrelationship a disruption to Canada's critical
infrastructure (CI) could have an immediate and deleterious impact
on the United States. Because it would be virtually impossible to
provide an exhaustive accounting of Canada's CI, this cable gives
illustrative examples of CI in various sectors. Protection of CI is
a Canadian national priority, and Canada is a close and trusted
partner with the United States in working to protect CI in North
America. End summary.
Canada's Approach to CI
¶2. Like the United States, Canada's critical infrastructure consists
of physical and information technology facilities, networks,
services and assets essential to the health, safety, security or
economic well-being of its citizens, or to the effective functioning
of government. In many respects, the two countries should be viewed
as sharing the same infrastructure (pipelines, bridges, power and
phone lines) sprawling across a shared economic space. As in the
United States, it is estimated that most (between 85 and 95
percent)of Canada's critical infrastructure is owned and operated by
private sector firms, which therefore bear primary responsibility
for the development and implementation of business continuity plans.
In addition to the federal government's role, the provinces and
territories also have a significant jurisdictional role in critical
infrastructure protection and emergency management. These
government entities also own and regulate some critical
infrastructure.
¶3. Canada has established the National Critical Infrastructure
Assurance Program (NCIAP) - an ongoing collaboration between private
sector partners and federal, provincial and territorial governments
- to provide a national framework for cooperative action and to
build a resilient national critical infrastructure. The federal
government classifies critical infrastructure within ten sectors, as
opposed to the USG classification system of 17 critical
infrastructure/key resources sectors.
¶4. The 10 Canadian sectors are:
* Energy and Utilities (e.g., electrical power, natural gas, oil
production/transmission)
* Information and Communications Technology (e.g.,
telecommunications, broadcasting systems, software, hardware, and
networks including the Internet)
* Finance (e.g., large-value payment, securities clearing and
settlement systems)
* Health Care (e.g., hospitals, blood-supply facilities and
pharmaceutical manufacturers)
* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
Q* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
* Water (e.g., drinking water and wastewater management)
* Transportation (e.g., road, rail, marine, and aviation)
* Safety (e.g., chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear
safety, dangerous goods, search and rescue, emergency services and
dams)
* Government (e.g., services, facilities, information networks and
key national monuments)
* Manufacturing (e.g., defense industrial base, chemical industry)
Cooperation with the United States
¶5. At the federal government level, the Public Safety Canada is
responsible for national CI policy. Public Safety Canada works
primarily with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
(particularly with the Office of Critical Infrastructure Protection)
on the identification of shared CI, threat analysis and response
planning; since 2005, under the auspices of the SPP. We understand
that Public Safety Canada and DHS have recently collaborated on a
detailed threat analysis of shared CI. Post would welcome a copy.
Examples of Canadian Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources with
Potentially Significant U.S. Impact (USG Categories)
in Ontario and seven U.S. states suffered a blackout of more than 48
hours due to a failure of our shared electricity grid (precipitated
by a fault at an Ohio power plant).
¶F. (SBU) Food & Agriculture - Canada and the United States are
engaged in a high volume of trade in agricultural products and
OTTAWA 00000274 011 OF 029
¶1. Summary: The economies, societies and environments of Canada and
the United States are inextricably intertwined; the relationship is
most easily reflected in the staggering volume of bilateral trade --
over US$1.5 billion a day in goods - and the 300,000 people who
cross the shared border every day to work or visit. Moreover,
Canada is the single largest foreign supplier of fossil fuels to the
United States (providing 17 percent of U.S. oil imports and over 80
percent of U.S. natural gas imports). Our food and agriculture
markets are almost completely integrated, with Canada accounting for
about 20 percent of total US agri-food imports. In addition our two
countries' financial markets and telecommunications and electrical
networks are highly interconnected. As a consequence of this
exceptional interrelationship a disruption to Canada's critical
infrastructure (CI) could have an immediate and deleterious impact
on the United States. Because it would be virtually impossible to
provide an exhaustive accounting of Canada's CI, this cable gives
illustrative examples of CI in various sectors. Protection of CI is
a Canadian national priority, and Canada is a close and trusted
partner with the United States in working to protect CI in North
America. End summary.
Canada's Approach to CI
¶2. Like the United States, Canada's critical infrastructure consists
of physical and information technology facilities, networks,
services and assets essential to the health, safety, security or
economic well-being of its citizens, or to the effective functioning
of government. In many respects, the two countries should be viewed
as sharing the same infrastructure (pipelines, bridges, power and
phone lines) sprawling across a shared economic space. As in the
United States, it is estimated that most (between 85 and 95
percent)of Canada's critical infrastructure is owned and operated by
private sector firms, which therefore bear primary responsibility
for the development and implementation of business continuity plans.
In addition to the federal government's role, the provinces and
territories also have a significant jurisdictional role in critical
infrastructure protection and emergency management. These
government entities also own and regulate some critical
infrastructure.
¶3. Canada has established the National Critical Infrastructure
Assurance Program (NCIAP) - an ongoing collaboration between private
sector partners and federal, provincial and territorial governments
- to provide a national framework for cooperative action and to
build a resilient national critical infrastructure. The federal
government classifies critical infrastructure within ten sectors, as
opposed to the USG classification system of 17 critical
infrastructure/key resources sectors.
¶4. The 10 Canadian sectors are:
* Energy and Utilities (e.g., electrical power, natural gas, oil
production/transmission)
* Information and Communications Technology (e.g.,
telecommunications, broadcasting systems, software, hardware, and
networks including the Internet)
* Finance (e.g., large-value payment, securities clearing and
settlement systems)
* Health Care (e.g., hospitals, blood-supply facilities and
pharmaceutical manufacturers)
* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
Q* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
* Water (e.g., drinking water and wastewater management)
* Transportation (e.g., road, rail, marine, and aviation)
* Safety (e.g., chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear
safety, dangerous goods, search and rescue, emergency services and
dams)
* Government (e.g., services, facilities, information networks and
key national monuments)
* Manufacturing (e.g., defense industrial base, chemical industry)
Cooperation with the United States
¶5. At the federal government level, the Public Safety Canada is
responsible for national CI policy. Public Safety Canada works
primarily with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
(particularly with the Office of Critical Infrastructure Protection)
on the identification of shared CI, threat analysis and response
planning; since 2005, under the auspices of the SPP. We understand
that Public Safety Canada and DHS have recently collaborated on a
detailed threat analysis of shared CI. Post would welcome a copy.
Examples of Canadian Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources with
Potentially Significant U.S. Impact (USG Categories)
seafood; the potential impact on the U.S. of agro-terrorism or
bioterrorism at a Canadian food facility would be correspondingly
high. The top five agri-food imports into the U.S. from Canada are:
baked goods (including pasta and breakfast cereals), beef,
beverages, vegetables and pork.
OTTAWA 00000274 012 OF 029
¶1. Summary: The economies, societies and environments of Canada and
the United States are inextricably intertwined; the relationship is
most easily reflected in the staggering volume of bilateral trade --
over US$1.5 billion a day in goods - and the 300,000 people who
cross the shared border every day to work or visit. Moreover,
Canada is the single largest foreign supplier of fossil fuels to the
United States (providing 17 percent of U.S. oil imports and over 80
percent of U.S. natural gas imports). Our food and agriculture
markets are almost completely integrated, with Canada accounting for
about 20 percent of total US agri-food imports. In addition our two
countries' financial markets and telecommunications and electrical
networks are highly interconnected. As a consequence of this
exceptional interrelationship a disruption to Canada's critical
infrastructure (CI) could have an immediate and deleterious impact
on the United States. Because it would be virtually impossible to
provide an exhaustive accounting of Canada's CI, this cable gives
illustrative examples of CI in various sectors. Protection of CI is
a Canadian national priority, and Canada is a close and trusted
partner with the United States in working to protect CI in North
America. End summary.
Canada's Approach to CI
¶2. Like the United States, Canada's critical infrastructure consists
of physical and information technology facilities, networks,
services and assets essential to the health, safety, security or
economic well-being of its citizens, or to the effective functioning
of government. In many respects, the two countries should be viewed
as sharing the same infrastructure (pipelines, bridges, power and
phone lines) sprawling across a shared economic space. As in the
United States, it is estimated that most (between 85 and 95
percent)of Canada's critical infrastructure is owned and operated by
private sector firms, which therefore bear primary responsibility
for the development and implementation of business continuity plans.
In addition to the federal government's role, the provinces and
territories also have a significant jurisdictional role in critical
infrastructure protection and emergency management. These
government entities also own and regulate some critical
infrastructure.
¶3. Canada has established the National Critical Infrastructure
Assurance Program (NCIAP) - an ongoing collaboration between private
sector partners and federal, provincial and territorial governments
- to provide a national framework for cooperative action and to
build a resilient national critical infrastructure. The federal
government classifies critical infrastructure within ten sectors, as
opposed to the USG classification system of 17 critical
infrastructure/key resources sectors.
¶4. The 10 Canadian sectors are:
* Energy and Utilities (e.g., electrical power, natural gas, oil
production/transmission)
* Information and Communications Technology (e.g.,
telecommunications, broadcasting systems, software, hardware, and
networks including the Internet)
* Finance (e.g., large-value payment, securities clearing and
settlement systems)
* Health Care (e.g., hospitals, blood-supply facilities and
pharmaceutical manufacturers)
* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
Q* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
* Water (e.g., drinking water and wastewater management)
* Transportation (e.g., road, rail, marine, and aviation)
* Safety (e.g., chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear
safety, dangerous goods, search and rescue, emergency services and
dams)
* Government (e.g., services, facilities, information networks and
key national monuments)
* Manufacturing (e.g., defense industrial base, chemical industry)
Cooperation with the United States
¶5. At the federal government level, the Public Safety Canada is
responsible for national CI policy. Public Safety Canada works
primarily with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
(particularly with the Office of Critical Infrastructure Protection)
on the identification of shared CI, threat analysis and response
planning; since 2005, under the auspices of the SPP. We understand
that Public Safety Canada and DHS have recently collaborated on a
detailed threat analysis of shared CI. Post would welcome a copy.
Examples of Canadian Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources with
Potentially Significant U.S. Impact (USG Categories)
¶G. (SBU) Information Technology - Millions of Americans rely on the
BlackBerry device produced by Research in Motion (RIM) of Waterloo,
Ontario; its network operations center in Ontario processes every
e-mail message to or from a BlackBerry. In early February 2008 more
than 5 million users were left without BlackBerry connectivity for
up to 24 hours during a technical upgrade, underscoring the
OTTAWA 00000274 013 OF 029
¶1. Summary: The economies, societies and environments of Canada and
the United States are inextricably intertwined; the relationship is
most easily reflected in the staggering volume of bilateral trade --
over US$1.5 billion a day in goods - and the 300,000 people who
cross the shared border every day to work or visit. Moreover,
Canada is the single largest foreign supplier of fossil fuels to the
United States (providing 17 percent of U.S. oil imports and over 80
percent of U.S. natural gas imports). Our food and agriculture
markets are almost completely integrated, with Canada accounting for
about 20 percent of total US agri-food imports. In addition our two
countries' financial markets and telecommunications and electrical
networks are highly interconnected. As a consequence of this
exceptional interrelationship a disruption to Canada's critical
infrastructure (CI) could have an immediate and deleterious impact
on the United States. Because it would be virtually impossible to
provide an exhaustive accounting of Canada's CI, this cable gives
illustrative examples of CI in various sectors. Protection of CI is
a Canadian national priority, and Canada is a close and trusted
partner with the United States in working to protect CI in North
America. End summary.
Canada's Approach to CI
¶2. Like the United States, Canada's critical infrastructure consists
of physical and information technology facilities, networks,
services and assets essential to the health, safety, security or
economic well-being of its citizens, or to the effective functioning
of government. In many respects, the two countries should be viewed
as sharing the same infrastructure (pipelines, bridges, power and
phone lines) sprawling across a shared economic space. As in the
United States, it is estimated that most (between 85 and 95
percent)of Canada's critical infrastructure is owned and operated by
private sector firms, which therefore bear primary responsibility
for the development and implementation of business continuity plans.
In addition to the federal government's role, the provinces and
territories also have a significant jurisdictional role in critical
infrastructure protection and emergency management. These
government entities also own and regulate some critical
infrastructure.
¶3. Canada has established the National Critical Infrastructure
Assurance Program (NCIAP) - an ongoing collaboration between private
sector partners and federal, provincial and territorial governments
- to provide a national framework for cooperative action and to
build a resilient national critical infrastructure. The federal
government classifies critical infrastructure within ten sectors, as
opposed to the USG classification system of 17 critical
infrastructure/key resources sectors.
¶4. The 10 Canadian sectors are:
* Energy and Utilities (e.g., electrical power, natural gas, oil
production/transmission)
* Information and Communications Technology (e.g.,
telecommunications, broadcasting systems, software, hardware, and
networks including the Internet)
* Finance (e.g., large-value payment, securities clearing and
settlement systems)
* Health Care (e.g., hospitals, blood-supply facilities and
pharmaceutical manufacturers)
* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
Q* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
* Water (e.g., drinking water and wastewater management)
* Transportation (e.g., road, rail, marine, and aviation)
* Safety (e.g., chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear
safety, dangerous goods, search and rescue, emergency services and
dams)
* Government (e.g., services, facilities, information networks and
key national monuments)
* Manufacturing (e.g., defense industrial base, chemical industry)
Cooperation with the United States
¶5. At the federal government level, the Public Safety Canada is
responsible for national CI policy. Public Safety Canada works
primarily with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
(particularly with the Office of Critical Infrastructure Protection)
on the identification of shared CI, threat analysis and response
planning; since 2005, under the auspices of the SPP. We understand
that Public Safety Canada and DHS have recently collaborated on a
detailed threat analysis of shared CI. Post would welcome a copy.
Examples of Canadian Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources with
Potentially Significant U.S. Impact (USG Categories)
cross-border impact of any disruption to RIM's Ontario facilities.
¶H. (SBU) National Monuments & Icons - Niagara Falls is located on
the Ontario-New York border and ranks high as a "North American"
icon (the Canadian "Horseshoe falls" is probably the most
picturesque portion). Disruption at this locale would likely have
OTTAWA 00000274 014 OF 029
¶1. Summary: The economies, societies and environments of Canada and
the United States are inextricably intertwined; the relationship is
most easily reflected in the staggering volume of bilateral trade --
over US$1.5 billion a day in goods - and the 300,000 people who
cross the shared border every day to work or visit. Moreover,
Canada is the single largest foreign supplier of fossil fuels to the
United States (providing 17 percent of U.S. oil imports and over 80
percent of U.S. natural gas imports). Our food and agriculture
markets are almost completely integrated, with Canada accounting for
about 20 percent of total US agri-food imports. In addition our two
countries' financial markets and telecommunications and electrical
networks are highly interconnected. As a consequence of this
exceptional interrelationship a disruption to Canada's critical
infrastructure (CI) could have an immediate and deleterious impact
on the United States. Because it would be virtually impossible to
provide an exhaustive accounting of Canada's CI, this cable gives
illustrative examples of CI in various sectors. Protection of CI is
a Canadian national priority, and Canada is a close and trusted
partner with the United States in working to protect CI in North
America. End summary.
Canada's Approach to CI
¶2. Like the United States, Canada's critical infrastructure consists
of physical and information technology facilities, networks,
services and assets essential to the health, safety, security or
economic well-being of its citizens, or to the effective functioning
of government. In many respects, the two countries should be viewed
as sharing the same infrastructure (pipelines, bridges, power and
phone lines) sprawling across a shared economic space. As in the
United States, it is estimated that most (between 85 and 95
percent)of Canada's critical infrastructure is owned and operated by
private sector firms, which therefore bear primary responsibility
for the development and implementation of business continuity plans.
In addition to the federal government's role, the provinces and
territories also have a significant jurisdictional role in critical
infrastructure protection and emergency management. These
government entities also own and regulate some critical
infrastructure.
¶3. Canada has established the National Critical Infrastructure
Assurance Program (NCIAP) - an ongoing collaboration between private
sector partners and federal, provincial and territorial governments
- to provide a national framework for cooperative action and to
build a resilient national critical infrastructure. The federal
government classifies critical infrastructure within ten sectors, as
opposed to the USG classification system of 17 critical
infrastructure/key resources sectors.
¶4. The 10 Canadian sectors are:
* Energy and Utilities (e.g., electrical power, natural gas, oil
production/transmission)
* Information and Communications Technology (e.g.,
telecommunications, broadcasting systems, software, hardware, and
networks including the Internet)
* Finance (e.g., large-value payment, securities clearing and
settlement systems)
* Health Care (e.g., hospitals, blood-supply facilities and
pharmaceutical manufacturers)
* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
Q* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
* Water (e.g., drinking water and wastewater management)
* Transportation (e.g., road, rail, marine, and aviation)
* Safety (e.g., chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear
safety, dangerous goods, search and rescue, emergency services and
dams)
* Government (e.g., services, facilities, information networks and
key national monuments)
* Manufacturing (e.g., defense industrial base, chemical industry)
Cooperation with the United States
¶5. At the federal government level, the Public Safety Canada is
responsible for national CI policy. Public Safety Canada works
primarily with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
(particularly with the Office of Critical Infrastructure Protection)
on the identification of shared CI, threat analysis and response
planning; since 2005, under the auspices of the SPP. We understand
that Public Safety Canada and DHS have recently collaborated on a
detailed threat analysis of shared CI. Post would welcome a copy.
Examples of Canadian Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources with
Potentially Significant U.S. Impact (USG Categories)
wide-ranging psycho-social impacts globally.
¶I. (SBU) Postal & Shipping - The St. Lawrence Seaway, jointly
managed by the U.S. and Canada, with its system of locks allows
ocean-going vessels to move between the high seas into the Great
Lakes, and facilitates ship-borne commerce between American and
OTTAWA 00000274 015 OF 029
¶1. Summary: The economies, societies and environments of Canada and
the United States are inextricably intertwined; the relationship is
most easily reflected in the staggering volume of bilateral trade --
over US$1.5 billion a day in goods - and the 300,000 people who
cross the shared border every day to work or visit. Moreover,
Canada is the single largest foreign supplier of fossil fuels to the
United States (providing 17 percent of U.S. oil imports and over 80
percent of U.S. natural gas imports). Our food and agriculture
markets are almost completely integrated, with Canada accounting for
about 20 percent of total US agri-food imports. In addition our two
countries' financial markets and telecommunications and electrical
networks are highly interconnected. As a consequence of this
exceptional interrelationship a disruption to Canada's critical
infrastructure (CI) could have an immediate and deleterious impact
on the United States. Because it would be virtually impossible to
provide an exhaustive accounting of Canada's CI, this cable gives
illustrative examples of CI in various sectors. Protection of CI is
a Canadian national priority, and Canada is a close and trusted
partner with the United States in working to protect CI in North
America. End summary.
Canada's Approach to CI
¶2. Like the United States, Canada's critical infrastructure consists
of physical and information technology facilities, networks,
services and assets essential to the health, safety, security or
economic well-being of its citizens, or to the effective functioning
of government. In many respects, the two countries should be viewed
as sharing the same infrastructure (pipelines, bridges, power and
phone lines) sprawling across a shared economic space. As in the
United States, it is estimated that most (between 85 and 95
percent)of Canada's critical infrastructure is owned and operated by
private sector firms, which therefore bear primary responsibility
for the development and implementation of business continuity plans.
In addition to the federal government's role, the provinces and
territories also have a significant jurisdictional role in critical
infrastructure protection and emergency management. These
government entities also own and regulate some critical
infrastructure.
¶3. Canada has established the National Critical Infrastructure
Assurance Program (NCIAP) - an ongoing collaboration between private
sector partners and federal, provincial and territorial governments
- to provide a national framework for cooperative action and to
build a resilient national critical infrastructure. The federal
government classifies critical infrastructure within ten sectors, as
opposed to the USG classification system of 17 critical
infrastructure/key resources sectors.
¶4. The 10 Canadian sectors are:
* Energy and Utilities (e.g., electrical power, natural gas, oil
production/transmission)
* Information and Communications Technology (e.g.,
telecommunications, broadcasting systems, software, hardware, and
networks including the Internet)
* Finance (e.g., large-value payment, securities clearing and
settlement systems)
* Health Care (e.g., hospitals, blood-supply facilities and
pharmaceutical manufacturers)
* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
Q* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
* Water (e.g., drinking water and wastewater management)
* Transportation (e.g., road, rail, marine, and aviation)
* Safety (e.g., chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear
safety, dangerous goods, search and rescue, emergency services and
dams)
* Government (e.g., services, facilities, information networks and
key national monuments)
* Manufacturing (e.g., defense industrial base, chemical industry)
Cooperation with the United States
¶5. At the federal government level, the Public Safety Canada is
responsible for national CI policy. Public Safety Canada works
primarily with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
(particularly with the Office of Critical Infrastructure Protection)
on the identification of shared CI, threat analysis and response
planning; since 2005, under the auspices of the SPP. We understand
that Public Safety Canada and DHS have recently collaborated on a
detailed threat analysis of shared CI. Post would welcome a copy.
Examples of Canadian Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources with
Potentially Significant U.S. Impact (USG Categories)
Canadian ports on the Great Lakes. Almost 50 percent of Seaway
traffic travels to and from overseas ports, especially those in
Europe, the Middle East and Africa. Disruption on the seaway would
create a cascade of logistics problems for many shippers in the
Great Lakes states.
OTTAWA 00000274 016 OF 029
¶1. Summary: The economies, societies and environments of Canada and
the United States are inextricably intertwined; the relationship is
most easily reflected in the staggering volume of bilateral trade --
over US$1.5 billion a day in goods - and the 300,000 people who
cross the shared border every day to work or visit. Moreover,
Canada is the single largest foreign supplier of fossil fuels to the
United States (providing 17 percent of U.S. oil imports and over 80
percent of U.S. natural gas imports). Our food and agriculture
markets are almost completely integrated, with Canada accounting for
about 20 percent of total US agri-food imports. In addition our two
countries' financial markets and telecommunications and electrical
networks are highly interconnected. As a consequence of this
exceptional interrelationship a disruption to Canada's critical
infrastructure (CI) could have an immediate and deleterious impact
on the United States. Because it would be virtually impossible to
provide an exhaustive accounting of Canada's CI, this cable gives
illustrative examples of CI in various sectors. Protection of CI is
a Canadian national priority, and Canada is a close and trusted
partner with the United States in working to protect CI in North
America. End summary.
Canada's Approach to CI
¶2. Like the United States, Canada's critical infrastructure consists
of physical and information technology facilities, networks,
services and assets essential to the health, safety, security or
economic well-being of its citizens, or to the effective functioning
of government. In many respects, the two countries should be viewed
as sharing the same infrastructure (pipelines, bridges, power and
phone lines) sprawling across a shared economic space. As in the
United States, it is estimated that most (between 85 and 95
percent)of Canada's critical infrastructure is owned and operated by
private sector firms, which therefore bear primary responsibility
for the development and implementation of business continuity plans.
In addition to the federal government's role, the provinces and
territories also have a significant jurisdictional role in critical
infrastructure protection and emergency management. These
government entities also own and regulate some critical
infrastructure.
¶3. Canada has established the National Critical Infrastructure
Assurance Program (NCIAP) - an ongoing collaboration between private
sector partners and federal, provincial and territorial governments
- to provide a national framework for cooperative action and to
build a resilient national critical infrastructure. The federal
government classifies critical infrastructure within ten sectors, as
opposed to the USG classification system of 17 critical
infrastructure/key resources sectors.
¶4. The 10 Canadian sectors are:
* Energy and Utilities (e.g., electrical power, natural gas, oil
production/transmission)
* Information and Communications Technology (e.g.,
telecommunications, broadcasting systems, software, hardware, and
networks including the Internet)
* Finance (e.g., large-value payment, securities clearing and
settlement systems)
* Health Care (e.g., hospitals, blood-supply facilities and
pharmaceutical manufacturers)
* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
Q* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
* Water (e.g., drinking water and wastewater management)
* Transportation (e.g., road, rail, marine, and aviation)
* Safety (e.g., chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear
safety, dangerous goods, search and rescue, emergency services and
dams)
* Government (e.g., services, facilities, information networks and
key national monuments)
* Manufacturing (e.g., defense industrial base, chemical industry)
Cooperation with the United States
¶5. At the federal government level, the Public Safety Canada is
responsible for national CI policy. Public Safety Canada works
primarily with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
(particularly with the Office of Critical Infrastructure Protection)
on the identification of shared CI, threat analysis and response
planning; since 2005, under the auspices of the SPP. We understand
that Public Safety Canada and DHS have recently collaborated on a
detailed threat analysis of shared CI. Post would welcome a copy.
Examples of Canadian Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources with
Potentially Significant U.S. Impact (USG Categories)
¶J. (SBU) Public Health and Healthcare - Approximately 3,500 Canadian
health care workers commute to the Detroit region on a daily basis,
and that number is expected to increase as Michigan health care
facilities continue recruiting in Canada due to an ongoing nursing
shortage. Disruption of this commute (via disinformation, attacks
on transport or bridges, for example) would directly and immediately
OTTAWA 00000274 017 OF 029
¶1. Summary: The economies, societies and environments of Canada and
the United States are inextricably intertwined; the relationship is
most easily reflected in the staggering volume of bilateral trade --
over US$1.5 billion a day in goods - and the 300,000 people who
cross the shared border every day to work or visit. Moreover,
Canada is the single largest foreign supplier of fossil fuels to the
United States (providing 17 percent of U.S. oil imports and over 80
percent of U.S. natural gas imports). Our food and agriculture
markets are almost completely integrated, with Canada accounting for
about 20 percent of total US agri-food imports. In addition our two
countries' financial markets and telecommunications and electrical
networks are highly interconnected. As a consequence of this
exceptional interrelationship a disruption to Canada's critical
infrastructure (CI) could have an immediate and deleterious impact
on the United States. Because it would be virtually impossible to
provide an exhaustive accounting of Canada's CI, this cable gives
illustrative examples of CI in various sectors. Protection of CI is
a Canadian national priority, and Canada is a close and trusted
partner with the United States in working to protect CI in North
America. End summary.
Canada's Approach to CI
¶2. Like the United States, Canada's critical infrastructure consists
of physical and information technology facilities, networks,
services and assets essential to the health, safety, security or
economic well-being of its citizens, or to the effective functioning
of government. In many respects, the two countries should be viewed
as sharing the same infrastructure (pipelines, bridges, power and
phone lines) sprawling across a shared economic space. As in the
United States, it is estimated that most (between 85 and 95
percent)of Canada's critical infrastructure is owned and operated by
private sector firms, which therefore bear primary responsibility
for the development and implementation of business continuity plans.
In addition to the federal government's role, the provinces and
territories also have a significant jurisdictional role in critical
infrastructure protection and emergency management. These
government entities also own and regulate some critical
infrastructure.
¶3. Canada has established the National Critical Infrastructure
Assurance Program (NCIAP) - an ongoing collaboration between private
sector partners and federal, provincial and territorial governments
- to provide a national framework for cooperative action and to
build a resilient national critical infrastructure. The federal
government classifies critical infrastructure within ten sectors, as
opposed to the USG classification system of 17 critical
infrastructure/key resources sectors.
¶4. The 10 Canadian sectors are:
* Energy and Utilities (e.g., electrical power, natural gas, oil
production/transmission)
* Information and Communications Technology (e.g.,
telecommunications, broadcasting systems, software, hardware, and
networks including the Internet)
* Finance (e.g., large-value payment, securities clearing and
settlement systems)
* Health Care (e.g., hospitals, blood-supply facilities and
pharmaceutical manufacturers)
* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
Q* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
* Water (e.g., drinking water and wastewater management)
* Transportation (e.g., road, rail, marine, and aviation)
* Safety (e.g., chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear
safety, dangerous goods, search and rescue, emergency services and
dams)
* Government (e.g., services, facilities, information networks and
key national monuments)
* Manufacturing (e.g., defense industrial base, chemical industry)
Cooperation with the United States
¶5. At the federal government level, the Public Safety Canada is
responsible for national CI policy. Public Safety Canada works
primarily with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
(particularly with the Office of Critical Infrastructure Protection)
on the identification of shared CI, threat analysis and response
planning; since 2005, under the auspices of the SPP. We understand
that Public Safety Canada and DHS have recently collaborated on a
detailed threat analysis of shared CI. Post would welcome a copy.
Examples of Canadian Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources with
Potentially Significant U.S. Impact (USG Categories)
impact health care for thousands of Michigan residents.
¶K. (SBU) Telecommunications - Canadian telecoms companies carry
Canadian defense communications into the U.S. where they link up
with U.S. networks. Canadian financial institutions with large U.S.
holdings and operations (e.g. Bank of Montreal with Harris Bank;
OTTAWA 00000274 018 OF 029
¶1. Summary: The economies, societies and environments of Canada and
the United States are inextricably intertwined; the relationship is
most easily reflected in the staggering volume of bilateral trade --
over US$1.5 billion a day in goods - and the 300,000 people who
cross the shared border every day to work or visit. Moreover,
Canada is the single largest foreign supplier of fossil fuels to the
United States (providing 17 percent of U.S. oil imports and over 80
percent of U.S. natural gas imports). Our food and agriculture
markets are almost completely integrated, with Canada accounting for
about 20 percent of total US agri-food imports. In addition our two
countries' financial markets and telecommunications and electrical
networks are highly interconnected. As a consequence of this
exceptional interrelationship a disruption to Canada's critical
infrastructure (CI) could have an immediate and deleterious impact
on the United States. Because it would be virtually impossible to
provide an exhaustive accounting of Canada's CI, this cable gives
illustrative examples of CI in various sectors. Protection of CI is
a Canadian national priority, and Canada is a close and trusted
partner with the United States in working to protect CI in North
America. End summary.
Canada's Approach to CI
¶2. Like the United States, Canada's critical infrastructure consists
of physical and information technology facilities, networks,
services and assets essential to the health, safety, security or
economic well-being of its citizens, or to the effective functioning
of government. In many respects, the two countries should be viewed
as sharing the same infrastructure (pipelines, bridges, power and
phone lines) sprawling across a shared economic space. As in the
United States, it is estimated that most (between 85 and 95
percent)of Canada's critical infrastructure is owned and operated by
private sector firms, which therefore bear primary responsibility
for the development and implementation of business continuity plans.
In addition to the federal government's role, the provinces and
territories also have a significant jurisdictional role in critical
infrastructure protection and emergency management. These
government entities also own and regulate some critical
infrastructure.
¶3. Canada has established the National Critical Infrastructure
Assurance Program (NCIAP) - an ongoing collaboration between private
sector partners and federal, provincial and territorial governments
- to provide a national framework for cooperative action and to
build a resilient national critical infrastructure. The federal
government classifies critical infrastructure within ten sectors, as
opposed to the USG classification system of 17 critical
infrastructure/key resources sectors.
¶4. The 10 Canadian sectors are:
* Energy and Utilities (e.g., electrical power, natural gas, oil
production/transmission)
* Information and Communications Technology (e.g.,
telecommunications, broadcasting systems, software, hardware, and
networks including the Internet)
* Finance (e.g., large-value payment, securities clearing and
settlement systems)
* Health Care (e.g., hospitals, blood-supply facilities and
pharmaceutical manufacturers)
* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
Q* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
* Water (e.g., drinking water and wastewater management)
* Transportation (e.g., road, rail, marine, and aviation)
* Safety (e.g., chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear
safety, dangerous goods, search and rescue, emergency services and
dams)
* Government (e.g., services, facilities, information networks and
key national monuments)
* Manufacturing (e.g., defense industrial base, chemical industry)
Cooperation with the United States
¶5. At the federal government level, the Public Safety Canada is
responsible for national CI policy. Public Safety Canada works
primarily with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
(particularly with the Office of Critical Infrastructure Protection)
on the identification of shared CI, threat analysis and response
planning; since 2005, under the auspices of the SPP. We understand
that Public Safety Canada and DHS have recently collaborated on a
detailed threat analysis of shared CI. Post would welcome a copy.
Examples of Canadian Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources with
Potentially Significant U.S. Impact (USG Categories)
Toronto Dominion with TD Banknorth; and Royal Bank of Canada with
Centura) use Canadian telecom networks to relay critical financial
data. Much command and control functionality for cross-border
electricity grids and pipelines is carried on Canadian telecoms
networks. Disruption to telecoms systems in Canada would have
immediate and deleterious effect on United States interests.
OTTAWA 00000274 019 OF 029
¶1. Summary: The economies, societies and environments of Canada and
the United States are inextricably intertwined; the relationship is
most easily reflected in the staggering volume of bilateral trade --
over US$1.5 billion a day in goods - and the 300,000 people who
cross the shared border every day to work or visit. Moreover,
Canada is the single largest foreign supplier of fossil fuels to the
United States (providing 17 percent of U.S. oil imports and over 80
percent of U.S. natural gas imports). Our food and agriculture
markets are almost completely integrated, with Canada accounting for
about 20 percent of total US agri-food imports. In addition our two
countries' financial markets and telecommunications and electrical
networks are highly interconnected. As a consequence of this
exceptional interrelationship a disruption to Canada's critical
infrastructure (CI) could have an immediate and deleterious impact
on the United States. Because it would be virtually impossible to
provide an exhaustive accounting of Canada's CI, this cable gives
illustrative examples of CI in various sectors. Protection of CI is
a Canadian national priority, and Canada is a close and trusted
partner with the United States in working to protect CI in North
America. End summary.
Canada's Approach to CI
¶2. Like the United States, Canada's critical infrastructure consists
of physical and information technology facilities, networks,
services and assets essential to the health, safety, security or
economic well-being of its citizens, or to the effective functioning
of government. In many respects, the two countries should be viewed
as sharing the same infrastructure (pipelines, bridges, power and
phone lines) sprawling across a shared economic space. As in the
United States, it is estimated that most (between 85 and 95
percent)of Canada's critical infrastructure is owned and operated by
private sector firms, which therefore bear primary responsibility
for the development and implementation of business continuity plans.
In addition to the federal government's role, the provinces and
territories also have a significant jurisdictional role in critical
infrastructure protection and emergency management. These
government entities also own and regulate some critical
infrastructure.
¶3. Canada has established the National Critical Infrastructure
Assurance Program (NCIAP) - an ongoing collaboration between private
sector partners and federal, provincial and territorial governments
- to provide a national framework for cooperative action and to
build a resilient national critical infrastructure. The federal
government classifies critical infrastructure within ten sectors, as
opposed to the USG classification system of 17 critical
infrastructure/key resources sectors.
¶4. The 10 Canadian sectors are:
* Energy and Utilities (e.g., electrical power, natural gas, oil
production/transmission)
* Information and Communications Technology (e.g.,
telecommunications, broadcasting systems, software, hardware, and
networks including the Internet)
* Finance (e.g., large-value payment, securities clearing and
settlement systems)
* Health Care (e.g., hospitals, blood-supply facilities and
pharmaceutical manufacturers)
* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
Q* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
* Water (e.g., drinking water and wastewater management)
* Transportation (e.g., road, rail, marine, and aviation)
* Safety (e.g., chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear
safety, dangerous goods, search and rescue, emergency services and
dams)
* Government (e.g., services, facilities, information networks and
key national monuments)
* Manufacturing (e.g., defense industrial base, chemical industry)
Cooperation with the United States
¶5. At the federal government level, the Public Safety Canada is
responsible for national CI policy. Public Safety Canada works
primarily with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
(particularly with the Office of Critical Infrastructure Protection)
on the identification of shared CI, threat analysis and response
planning; since 2005, under the auspices of the SPP. We understand
that Public Safety Canada and DHS have recently collaborated on a
detailed threat analysis of shared CI. Post would welcome a copy.
Examples of Canadian Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources with
Potentially Significant U.S. Impact (USG Categories)
¶L. (SBU) Transportation - The value of goods transported annually
across a single bridge, the Ambassador bridge, between Detroit,
Michigan and Windsor, Ontario (valued at approximately US$108
billion in 2006), is more than the entire annual merchandise trade
between the United States and the United Kingdom (US$98 billion in
OTTAWA 00000274 020 OF 029
¶1. Summary: The economies, societies and environments of Canada and
the United States are inextricably intertwined; the relationship is
most easily reflected in the staggering volume of bilateral trade --
over US$1.5 billion a day in goods - and the 300,000 people who
cross the shared border every day to work or visit. Moreover,
Canada is the single largest foreign supplier of fossil fuels to the
United States (providing 17 percent of U.S. oil imports and over 80
percent of U.S. natural gas imports). Our food and agriculture
markets are almost completely integrated, with Canada accounting for
about 20 percent of total US agri-food imports. In addition our two
countries' financial markets and telecommunications and electrical
networks are highly interconnected. As a consequence of this
exceptional interrelationship a disruption to Canada's critical
infrastructure (CI) could have an immediate and deleterious impact
on the United States. Because it would be virtually impossible to
provide an exhaustive accounting of Canada's CI, this cable gives
illustrative examples of CI in various sectors. Protection of CI is
a Canadian national priority, and Canada is a close and trusted
partner with the United States in working to protect CI in North
America. End summary.
Canada's Approach to CI
¶2. Like the United States, Canada's critical infrastructure consists
of physical and information technology facilities, networks,
services and assets essential to the health, safety, security or
economic well-being of its citizens, or to the effective functioning
of government. In many respects, the two countries should be viewed
as sharing the same infrastructure (pipelines, bridges, power and
phone lines) sprawling across a shared economic space. As in the
United States, it is estimated that most (between 85 and 95
percent)of Canada's critical infrastructure is owned and operated by
private sector firms, which therefore bear primary responsibility
for the development and implementation of business continuity plans.
In addition to the federal government's role, the provinces and
territories also have a significant jurisdictional role in critical
infrastructure protection and emergency management. These
government entities also own and regulate some critical
infrastructure.
¶3. Canada has established the National Critical Infrastructure
Assurance Program (NCIAP) - an ongoing collaboration between private
sector partners and federal, provincial and territorial governments
- to provide a national framework for cooperative action and to
build a resilient national critical infrastructure. The federal
government classifies critical infrastructure within ten sectors, as
opposed to the USG classification system of 17 critical
infrastructure/key resources sectors.
¶4. The 10 Canadian sectors are:
* Energy and Utilities (e.g., electrical power, natural gas, oil
production/transmission)
* Information and Communications Technology (e.g.,
telecommunications, broadcasting systems, software, hardware, and
networks including the Internet)
* Finance (e.g., large-value payment, securities clearing and
settlement systems)
* Health Care (e.g., hospitals, blood-supply facilities and
pharmaceutical manufacturers)
* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
Q* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
* Water (e.g., drinking water and wastewater management)
* Transportation (e.g., road, rail, marine, and aviation)
* Safety (e.g., chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear
safety, dangerous goods, search and rescue, emergency services and
dams)
* Government (e.g., services, facilities, information networks and
key national monuments)
* Manufacturing (e.g., defense industrial base, chemical industry)
Cooperation with the United States
¶5. At the federal government level, the Public Safety Canada is
responsible for national CI policy. Public Safety Canada works
primarily with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
(particularly with the Office of Critical Infrastructure Protection)
on the identification of shared CI, threat analysis and response
planning; since 2005, under the auspices of the SPP. We understand
that Public Safety Canada and DHS have recently collaborated on a
detailed threat analysis of shared CI. Post would welcome a copy.
Examples of Canadian Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources with
Potentially Significant U.S. Impact (USG Categories)
2006). Destruction or disruption of this bridge would have a
significant impact on, inter alia, the highly integrated North
American automotive industry.
¶M. (SBU) Water - The Point Roberts Water District in Washington
state draws 840,000 gallons of water per day for its residents from
OTTAWA 00000274 021 OF 029
¶1. Summary: The economies, societies and environments of Canada and
the United States are inextricably intertwined; the relationship is
most easily reflected in the staggering volume of bilateral trade --
over US$1.5 billion a day in goods - and the 300,000 people who
cross the shared border every day to work or visit. Moreover,
Canada is the single largest foreign supplier of fossil fuels to the
United States (providing 17 percent of U.S. oil imports and over 80
percent of U.S. natural gas imports). Our food and agriculture
markets are almost completely integrated, with Canada accounting for
about 20 percent of total US agri-food imports. In addition our two
countries' financial markets and telecommunications and electrical
networks are highly interconnected. As a consequence of this
exceptional interrelationship a disruption to Canada's critical
infrastructure (CI) could have an immediate and deleterious impact
on the United States. Because it would be virtually impossible to
provide an exhaustive accounting of Canada's CI, this cable gives
illustrative examples of CI in various sectors. Protection of CI is
a Canadian national priority, and Canada is a close and trusted
partner with the United States in working to protect CI in North
America. End summary.
Canada's Approach to CI
¶2. Like the United States, Canada's critical infrastructure consists
of physical and information technology facilities, networks,
services and assets essential to the health, safety, security or
economic well-being of its citizens, or to the effective functioning
of government. In many respects, the two countries should be viewed
as sharing the same infrastructure (pipelines, bridges, power and
phone lines) sprawling across a shared economic space. As in the
United States, it is estimated that most (between 85 and 95
percent)of Canada's critical infrastructure is owned and operated by
private sector firms, which therefore bear primary responsibility
for the development and implementation of business continuity plans.
In addition to the federal government's role, the provinces and
territories also have a significant jurisdictional role in critical
infrastructure protection and emergency management. These
government entities also own and regulate some critical
infrastructure.
¶3. Canada has established the National Critical Infrastructure
Assurance Program (NCIAP) - an ongoing collaboration between private
sector partners and federal, provincial and territorial governments
- to provide a national framework for cooperative action and to
build a resilient national critical infrastructure. The federal
government classifies critical infrastructure within ten sectors, as
opposed to the USG classification system of 17 critical
infrastructure/key resources sectors.
¶4. The 10 Canadian sectors are:
* Energy and Utilities (e.g., electrical power, natural gas, oil
production/transmission)
* Information and Communications Technology (e.g.,
telecommunications, broadcasting systems, software, hardware, and
networks including the Internet)
* Finance (e.g., large-value payment, securities clearing and
settlement systems)
* Health Care (e.g., hospitals, blood-supply facilities and
pharmaceutical manufacturers)
* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
Q* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
* Water (e.g., drinking water and wastewater management)
* Transportation (e.g., road, rail, marine, and aviation)
* Safety (e.g., chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear
safety, dangerous goods, search and rescue, emergency services and
dams)
* Government (e.g., services, facilities, information networks and
key national monuments)
* Manufacturing (e.g., defense industrial base, chemical industry)
Cooperation with the United States
¶5. At the federal government level, the Public Safety Canada is
responsible for national CI policy. Public Safety Canada works
primarily with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
(particularly with the Office of Critical Infrastructure Protection)
on the identification of shared CI, threat analysis and response
planning; since 2005, under the auspices of the SPP. We understand
that Public Safety Canada and DHS have recently collaborated on a
detailed threat analysis of shared CI. Post would welcome a copy.
Examples of Canadian Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources with
Potentially Significant U.S. Impact (USG Categories)
the Greater Vancouver Water District (GVWD) from a reservoir located
in Delta, British Columbia. Disruption of this supply would create
significant distress for the population of this diminutive United
States exclave.
¶N. (SBU) Commercial Facilities - NAVCanada (NAVCAN) is the private,
OTTAWA 00000274 022 OF 029
¶1. Summary: The economies, societies and environments of Canada and
the United States are inextricably intertwined; the relationship is
most easily reflected in the staggering volume of bilateral trade --
over US$1.5 billion a day in goods - and the 300,000 people who
cross the shared border every day to work or visit. Moreover,
Canada is the single largest foreign supplier of fossil fuels to the
United States (providing 17 percent of U.S. oil imports and over 80
percent of U.S. natural gas imports). Our food and agriculture
markets are almost completely integrated, with Canada accounting for
about 20 percent of total US agri-food imports. In addition our two
countries' financial markets and telecommunications and electrical
networks are highly interconnected. As a consequence of this
exceptional interrelationship a disruption to Canada's critical
infrastructure (CI) could have an immediate and deleterious impact
on the United States. Because it would be virtually impossible to
provide an exhaustive accounting of Canada's CI, this cable gives
illustrative examples of CI in various sectors. Protection of CI is
a Canadian national priority, and Canada is a close and trusted
partner with the United States in working to protect CI in North
America. End summary.
Canada's Approach to CI
¶2. Like the United States, Canada's critical infrastructure consists
of physical and information technology facilities, networks,
services and assets essential to the health, safety, security or
economic well-being of its citizens, or to the effective functioning
of government. In many respects, the two countries should be viewed
as sharing the same infrastructure (pipelines, bridges, power and
phone lines) sprawling across a shared economic space. As in the
United States, it is estimated that most (between 85 and 95
percent)of Canada's critical infrastructure is owned and operated by
private sector firms, which therefore bear primary responsibility
for the development and implementation of business continuity plans.
In addition to the federal government's role, the provinces and
territories also have a significant jurisdictional role in critical
infrastructure protection and emergency management. These
government entities also own and regulate some critical
infrastructure.
¶3. Canada has established the National Critical Infrastructure
Assurance Program (NCIAP) - an ongoing collaboration between private
sector partners and federal, provincial and territorial governments
- to provide a national framework for cooperative action and to
build a resilient national critical infrastructure. The federal
government classifies critical infrastructure within ten sectors, as
opposed to the USG classification system of 17 critical
infrastructure/key resources sectors.
¶4. The 10 Canadian sectors are:
* Energy and Utilities (e.g., electrical power, natural gas, oil
production/transmission)
* Information and Communications Technology (e.g.,
telecommunications, broadcasting systems, software, hardware, and
networks including the Internet)
* Finance (e.g., large-value payment, securities clearing and
settlement systems)
* Health Care (e.g., hospitals, blood-supply facilities and
pharmaceutical manufacturers)
* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
Q* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
* Water (e.g., drinking water and wastewater management)
* Transportation (e.g., road, rail, marine, and aviation)
* Safety (e.g., chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear
safety, dangerous goods, search and rescue, emergency services and
dams)
* Government (e.g., services, facilities, information networks and
key national monuments)
* Manufacturing (e.g., defense industrial base, chemical industry)
Cooperation with the United States
¶5. At the federal government level, the Public Safety Canada is
responsible for national CI policy. Public Safety Canada works
primarily with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
(particularly with the Office of Critical Infrastructure Protection)
on the identification of shared CI, threat analysis and response
planning; since 2005, under the auspices of the SPP. We understand
that Public Safety Canada and DHS have recently collaborated on a
detailed threat analysis of shared CI. Post would welcome a copy.
Examples of Canadian Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources with
Potentially Significant U.S. Impact (USG Categories)
not-for-profit operator of Canada's civil air navigation system;
NAVCAN manages all transatlantic air traffic between Iceland and
North American landfall. Disruption of this service would affect
(cancel or postpone) hundreds of transatlantic flights per day.
¶O. (SBU) Dams - Three dams in British Columbia regulate the flow of
OTTAWA 00000274 023 OF 029
¶1. Summary: The economies, societies and environments of Canada and
the United States are inextricably intertwined; the relationship is
most easily reflected in the staggering volume of bilateral trade --
over US$1.5 billion a day in goods - and the 300,000 people who
cross the shared border every day to work or visit. Moreover,
Canada is the single largest foreign supplier of fossil fuels to the
United States (providing 17 percent of U.S. oil imports and over 80
percent of U.S. natural gas imports). Our food and agriculture
markets are almost completely integrated, with Canada accounting for
about 20 percent of total US agri-food imports. In addition our two
countries' financial markets and telecommunications and electrical
networks are highly interconnected. As a consequence of this
exceptional interrelationship a disruption to Canada's critical
infrastructure (CI) could have an immediate and deleterious impact
on the United States. Because it would be virtually impossible to
provide an exhaustive accounting of Canada's CI, this cable gives
illustrative examples of CI in various sectors. Protection of CI is
a Canadian national priority, and Canada is a close and trusted
partner with the United States in working to protect CI in North
America. End summary.
Canada's Approach to CI
¶2. Like the United States, Canada's critical infrastructure consists
of physical and information technology facilities, networks,
services and assets essential to the health, safety, security or
economic well-being of its citizens, or to the effective functioning
of government. In many respects, the two countries should be viewed
as sharing the same infrastructure (pipelines, bridges, power and
phone lines) sprawling across a shared economic space. As in the
United States, it is estimated that most (between 85 and 95
percent)of Canada's critical infrastructure is owned and operated by
private sector firms, which therefore bear primary responsibility
for the development and implementation of business continuity plans.
In addition to the federal government's role, the provinces and
territories also have a significant jurisdictional role in critical
infrastructure protection and emergency management. These
government entities also own and regulate some critical
infrastructure.
¶3. Canada has established the National Critical Infrastructure
Assurance Program (NCIAP) - an ongoing collaboration between private
sector partners and federal, provincial and territorial governments
- to provide a national framework for cooperative action and to
build a resilient national critical infrastructure. The federal
government classifies critical infrastructure within ten sectors, as
opposed to the USG classification system of 17 critical
infrastructure/key resources sectors.
¶4. The 10 Canadian sectors are:
* Energy and Utilities (e.g., electrical power, natural gas, oil
production/transmission)
* Information and Communications Technology (e.g.,
telecommunications, broadcasting systems, software, hardware, and
networks including the Internet)
* Finance (e.g., large-value payment, securities clearing and
settlement systems)
* Health Care (e.g., hospitals, blood-supply facilities and
pharmaceutical manufacturers)
* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
Q* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
* Water (e.g., drinking water and wastewater management)
* Transportation (e.g., road, rail, marine, and aviation)
* Safety (e.g., chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear
safety, dangerous goods, search and rescue, emergency services and
dams)
* Government (e.g., services, facilities, information networks and
key national monuments)
* Manufacturing (e.g., defense industrial base, chemical industry)
Cooperation with the United States
¶5. At the federal government level, the Public Safety Canada is
responsible for national CI policy. Public Safety Canada works
primarily with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
(particularly with the Office of Critical Infrastructure Protection)
on the identification of shared CI, threat analysis and response
planning; since 2005, under the auspices of the SPP. We understand
that Public Safety Canada and DHS have recently collaborated on a
detailed threat analysis of shared CI. Post would welcome a copy.
Examples of Canadian Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources with
Potentially Significant U.S. Impact (USG Categories)
the Columbia River into the United States. The Mica, Hugh
Keenleyside and Duncan dams were built as a result of the Columbia
River Treaty, signed by Canada and the United States in 1964. The
Treaty dams provide flood control, and they are essential to the
maintenance of power generation at hydro-electric plants in the
United States. Flooding and/or loss of electricity generation
OTTAWA 00000274 024 OF 029
¶1. Summary: The economies, societies and environments of Canada and
the United States are inextricably intertwined; the relationship is
most easily reflected in the staggering volume of bilateral trade --
over US$1.5 billion a day in goods - and the 300,000 people who
cross the shared border every day to work or visit. Moreover,
Canada is the single largest foreign supplier of fossil fuels to the
United States (providing 17 percent of U.S. oil imports and over 80
percent of U.S. natural gas imports). Our food and agriculture
markets are almost completely integrated, with Canada accounting for
about 20 percent of total US agri-food imports. In addition our two
countries' financial markets and telecommunications and electrical
networks are highly interconnected. As a consequence of this
exceptional interrelationship a disruption to Canada's critical
infrastructure (CI) could have an immediate and deleterious impact
on the United States. Because it would be virtually impossible to
provide an exhaustive accounting of Canada's CI, this cable gives
illustrative examples of CI in various sectors. Protection of CI is
a Canadian national priority, and Canada is a close and trusted
partner with the United States in working to protect CI in North
America. End summary.
Canada's Approach to CI
¶2. Like the United States, Canada's critical infrastructure consists
of physical and information technology facilities, networks,
services and assets essential to the health, safety, security or
economic well-being of its citizens, or to the effective functioning
of government. In many respects, the two countries should be viewed
as sharing the same infrastructure (pipelines, bridges, power and
phone lines) sprawling across a shared economic space. As in the
United States, it is estimated that most (between 85 and 95
percent)of Canada's critical infrastructure is owned and operated by
private sector firms, which therefore bear primary responsibility
for the development and implementation of business continuity plans.
In addition to the federal government's role, the provinces and
territories also have a significant jurisdictional role in critical
infrastructure protection and emergency management. These
government entities also own and regulate some critical
infrastructure.
¶3. Canada has established the National Critical Infrastructure
Assurance Program (NCIAP) - an ongoing collaboration between private
sector partners and federal, provincial and territorial governments
- to provide a national framework for cooperative action and to
build a resilient national critical infrastructure. The federal
government classifies critical infrastructure within ten sectors, as
opposed to the USG classification system of 17 critical
infrastructure/key resources sectors.
¶4. The 10 Canadian sectors are:
* Energy and Utilities (e.g., electrical power, natural gas, oil
production/transmission)
* Information and Communications Technology (e.g.,
telecommunications, broadcasting systems, software, hardware, and
networks including the Internet)
* Finance (e.g., large-value payment, securities clearing and
settlement systems)
* Health Care (e.g., hospitals, blood-supply facilities and
pharmaceutical manufacturers)
* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
Q* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
* Water (e.g., drinking water and wastewater management)
* Transportation (e.g., road, rail, marine, and aviation)
* Safety (e.g., chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear
safety, dangerous goods, search and rescue, emergency services and
dams)
* Government (e.g., services, facilities, information networks and
key national monuments)
* Manufacturing (e.g., defense industrial base, chemical industry)
Cooperation with the United States
¶5. At the federal government level, the Public Safety Canada is
responsible for national CI policy. Public Safety Canada works
primarily with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
(particularly with the Office of Critical Infrastructure Protection)
on the identification of shared CI, threat analysis and response
planning; since 2005, under the auspices of the SPP. We understand
that Public Safety Canada and DHS have recently collaborated on a
detailed threat analysis of shared CI. Post would welcome a copy.
Examples of Canadian Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources with
Potentially Significant U.S. Impact (USG Categories)
capacity in the United States could result if the dams were
destroyed or otherwise exploited.
¶P. (SBU) Government Facilities - NORAD, the North American Aerospace
Defense Command, is an integrated bi-national United States and
Canadian organization charged with the missions of aerospace warning
OTTAWA 00000274 025 OF 029
¶1. Summary: The economies, societies and environments of Canada and
the United States are inextricably intertwined; the relationship is
most easily reflected in the staggering volume of bilateral trade --
over US$1.5 billion a day in goods - and the 300,000 people who
cross the shared border every day to work or visit. Moreover,
Canada is the single largest foreign supplier of fossil fuels to the
United States (providing 17 percent of U.S. oil imports and over 80
percent of U.S. natural gas imports). Our food and agriculture
markets are almost completely integrated, with Canada accounting for
about 20 percent of total US agri-food imports. In addition our two
countries' financial markets and telecommunications and electrical
networks are highly interconnected. As a consequence of this
exceptional interrelationship a disruption to Canada's critical
infrastructure (CI) could have an immediate and deleterious impact
on the United States. Because it would be virtually impossible to
provide an exhaustive accounting of Canada's CI, this cable gives
illustrative examples of CI in various sectors. Protection of CI is
a Canadian national priority, and Canada is a close and trusted
partner with the United States in working to protect CI in North
America. End summary.
Canada's Approach to CI
¶2. Like the United States, Canada's critical infrastructure consists
of physical and information technology facilities, networks,
services and assets essential to the health, safety, security or
economic well-being of its citizens, or to the effective functioning
of government. In many respects, the two countries should be viewed
as sharing the same infrastructure (pipelines, bridges, power and
phone lines) sprawling across a shared economic space. As in the
United States, it is estimated that most (between 85 and 95
percent)of Canada's critical infrastructure is owned and operated by
private sector firms, which therefore bear primary responsibility
for the development and implementation of business continuity plans.
In addition to the federal government's role, the provinces and
territories also have a significant jurisdictional role in critical
infrastructure protection and emergency management. These
government entities also own and regulate some critical
infrastructure.
¶3. Canada has established the National Critical Infrastructure
Assurance Program (NCIAP) - an ongoing collaboration between private
sector partners and federal, provincial and territorial governments
- to provide a national framework for cooperative action and to
build a resilient national critical infrastructure. The federal
government classifies critical infrastructure within ten sectors, as
opposed to the USG classification system of 17 critical
infrastructure/key resources sectors.
¶4. The 10 Canadian sectors are:
* Energy and Utilities (e.g., electrical power, natural gas, oil
production/transmission)
* Information and Communications Technology (e.g.,
telecommunications, broadcasting systems, software, hardware, and
networks including the Internet)
* Finance (e.g., large-value payment, securities clearing and
settlement systems)
* Health Care (e.g., hospitals, blood-supply facilities and
pharmaceutical manufacturers)
* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
Q* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
* Water (e.g., drinking water and wastewater management)
* Transportation (e.g., road, rail, marine, and aviation)
* Safety (e.g., chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear
safety, dangerous goods, search and rescue, emergency services and
dams)
* Government (e.g., services, facilities, information networks and
key national monuments)
* Manufacturing (e.g., defense industrial base, chemical industry)
Cooperation with the United States
¶5. At the federal government level, the Public Safety Canada is
responsible for national CI policy. Public Safety Canada works
primarily with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
(particularly with the Office of Critical Infrastructure Protection)
on the identification of shared CI, threat analysis and response
planning; since 2005, under the auspices of the SPP. We understand
that Public Safety Canada and DHS have recently collaborated on a
detailed threat analysis of shared CI. Post would welcome a copy.
Examples of Canadian Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources with
Potentially Significant U.S. Impact (USG Categories)
and aerospace control for North America. One of three subordinate
regional HQs is located in Canada, at Winnipeg, Manitoba (the other
two regional HQs are in Alaska and Florida).
¶Q. (SBU) Nuclear Power Plants (NPPs)- In Ontario ten operating
nuclear reactor units are situated at Pickering and Darlington on
OTTAWA 00000274 026 OF 029
¶1. Summary: The economies, societies and environments of Canada and
the United States are inextricably intertwined; the relationship is
most easily reflected in the staggering volume of bilateral trade --
over US$1.5 billion a day in goods - and the 300,000 people who
cross the shared border every day to work or visit. Moreover,
Canada is the single largest foreign supplier of fossil fuels to the
United States (providing 17 percent of U.S. oil imports and over 80
percent of U.S. natural gas imports). Our food and agriculture
markets are almost completely integrated, with Canada accounting for
about 20 percent of total US agri-food imports. In addition our two
countries' financial markets and telecommunications and electrical
networks are highly interconnected. As a consequence of this
exceptional interrelationship a disruption to Canada's critical
infrastructure (CI) could have an immediate and deleterious impact
on the United States. Because it would be virtually impossible to
provide an exhaustive accounting of Canada's CI, this cable gives
illustrative examples of CI in various sectors. Protection of CI is
a Canadian national priority, and Canada is a close and trusted
partner with the United States in working to protect CI in North
America. End summary.
Canada's Approach to CI
¶2. Like the United States, Canada's critical infrastructure consists
of physical and information technology facilities, networks,
services and assets essential to the health, safety, security or
economic well-being of its citizens, or to the effective functioning
of government. In many respects, the two countries should be viewed
as sharing the same infrastructure (pipelines, bridges, power and
phone lines) sprawling across a shared economic space. As in the
United States, it is estimated that most (between 85 and 95
percent)of Canada's critical infrastructure is owned and operated by
private sector firms, which therefore bear primary responsibility
for the development and implementation of business continuity plans.
In addition to the federal government's role, the provinces and
territories also have a significant jurisdictional role in critical
infrastructure protection and emergency management. These
government entities also own and regulate some critical
infrastructure.
¶3. Canada has established the National Critical Infrastructure
Assurance Program (NCIAP) - an ongoing collaboration between private
sector partners and federal, provincial and territorial governments
- to provide a national framework for cooperative action and to
build a resilient national critical infrastructure. The federal
government classifies critical infrastructure within ten sectors, as
opposed to the USG classification system of 17 critical
infrastructure/key resources sectors.
¶4. The 10 Canadian sectors are:
* Energy and Utilities (e.g., electrical power, natural gas, oil
production/transmission)
* Information and Communications Technology (e.g.,
telecommunications, broadcasting systems, software, hardware, and
networks including the Internet)
* Finance (e.g., large-value payment, securities clearing and
settlement systems)
* Health Care (e.g., hospitals, blood-supply facilities and
pharmaceutical manufacturers)
* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
Q* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
* Water (e.g., drinking water and wastewater management)
* Transportation (e.g., road, rail, marine, and aviation)
* Safety (e.g., chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear
safety, dangerous goods, search and rescue, emergency services and
dams)
* Government (e.g., services, facilities, information networks and
key national monuments)
* Manufacturing (e.g., defense industrial base, chemical industry)
Cooperation with the United States
¶5. At the federal government level, the Public Safety Canada is
responsible for national CI policy. Public Safety Canada works
primarily with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
(particularly with the Office of Critical Infrastructure Protection)
on the identification of shared CI, threat analysis and response
planning; since 2005, under the auspices of the SPP. We understand
that Public Safety Canada and DHS have recently collaborated on a
detailed threat analysis of shared CI. Post would welcome a copy.
Examples of Canadian Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources with
Potentially Significant U.S. Impact (USG Categories)
Lake Ontario facing New York State (roughly 60 miles north-east of
Buffalo). Another six operating nuclear reactor units are situated
on the shores of Lake Huron, adjacent to Lake Superior. One nuclear
reactor is located in New Brunswick adjacent to the Bay of Fundy,
about 45 miles from the New Brunswick-Maine border, and one is
situated in Quebec on the south shore of the St. Lawrence River
OTTAWA 00000274 027 OF 029
¶1. Summary: The economies, societies and environments of Canada and
the United States are inextricably intertwined; the relationship is
most easily reflected in the staggering volume of bilateral trade --
over US$1.5 billion a day in goods - and the 300,000 people who
cross the shared border every day to work or visit. Moreover,
Canada is the single largest foreign supplier of fossil fuels to the
United States (providing 17 percent of U.S. oil imports and over 80
percent of U.S. natural gas imports). Our food and agriculture
markets are almost completely integrated, with Canada accounting for
about 20 percent of total US agri-food imports. In addition our two
countries' financial markets and telecommunications and electrical
networks are highly interconnected. As a consequence of this
exceptional interrelationship a disruption to Canada's critical
infrastructure (CI) could have an immediate and deleterious impact
on the United States. Because it would be virtually impossible to
provide an exhaustive accounting of Canada's CI, this cable gives
illustrative examples of CI in various sectors. Protection of CI is
a Canadian national priority, and Canada is a close and trusted
partner with the United States in working to protect CI in North
America. End summary.
Canada's Approach to CI
¶2. Like the United States, Canada's critical infrastructure consists
of physical and information technology facilities, networks,
services and assets essential to the health, safety, security or
economic well-being of its citizens, or to the effective functioning
of government. In many respects, the two countries should be viewed
as sharing the same infrastructure (pipelines, bridges, power and
phone lines) sprawling across a shared economic space. As in the
United States, it is estimated that most (between 85 and 95
percent)of Canada's critical infrastructure is owned and operated by
private sector firms, which therefore bear primary responsibility
for the development and implementation of business continuity plans.
In addition to the federal government's role, the provinces and
territories also have a significant jurisdictional role in critical
infrastructure protection and emergency management. These
government entities also own and regulate some critical
infrastructure.
¶3. Canada has established the National Critical Infrastructure
Assurance Program (NCIAP) - an ongoing collaboration between private
sector partners and federal, provincial and territorial governments
- to provide a national framework for cooperative action and to
build a resilient national critical infrastructure. The federal
government classifies critical infrastructure within ten sectors, as
opposed to the USG classification system of 17 critical
infrastructure/key resources sectors.
¶4. The 10 Canadian sectors are:
* Energy and Utilities (e.g., electrical power, natural gas, oil
production/transmission)
* Information and Communications Technology (e.g.,
telecommunications, broadcasting systems, software, hardware, and
networks including the Internet)
* Finance (e.g., large-value payment, securities clearing and
settlement systems)
* Health Care (e.g., hospitals, blood-supply facilities and
pharmaceutical manufacturers)
* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
Q* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
* Water (e.g., drinking water and wastewater management)
* Transportation (e.g., road, rail, marine, and aviation)
* Safety (e.g., chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear
safety, dangerous goods, search and rescue, emergency services and
dams)
* Government (e.g., services, facilities, information networks and
key national monuments)
* Manufacturing (e.g., defense industrial base, chemical industry)
Cooperation with the United States
¶5. At the federal government level, the Public Safety Canada is
responsible for national CI policy. Public Safety Canada works
primarily with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
(particularly with the Office of Critical Infrastructure Protection)
on the identification of shared CI, threat analysis and response
planning; since 2005, under the auspices of the SPP. We understand
that Public Safety Canada and DHS have recently collaborated on a
detailed threat analysis of shared CI. Post would welcome a copy.
Examples of Canadian Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources with
Potentially Significant U.S. Impact (USG Categories)
about 100 miles north of the Quebec-Vermont border. If an NPP
containment facility were breached and radiological materials were
released some contamination of U.S. territory (land or water) might
be expected.
¶6. (SBU) Comment: The inventory of critical infrastructure and key
OTTAWA 00000274 028 OF 029
¶1. Summary: The economies, societies and environments of Canada and
the United States are inextricably intertwined; the relationship is
most easily reflected in the staggering volume of bilateral trade --
over US$1.5 billion a day in goods - and the 300,000 people who
cross the shared border every day to work or visit. Moreover,
Canada is the single largest foreign supplier of fossil fuels to the
United States (providing 17 percent of U.S. oil imports and over 80
percent of U.S. natural gas imports). Our food and agriculture
markets are almost completely integrated, with Canada accounting for
about 20 percent of total US agri-food imports. In addition our two
countries' financial markets and telecommunications and electrical
networks are highly interconnected. As a consequence of this
exceptional interrelationship a disruption to Canada's critical
infrastructure (CI) could have an immediate and deleterious impact
on the United States. Because it would be virtually impossible to
provide an exhaustive accounting of Canada's CI, this cable gives
illustrative examples of CI in various sectors. Protection of CI is
a Canadian national priority, and Canada is a close and trusted
partner with the United States in working to protect CI in North
America. End summary.
Canada's Approach to CI
¶2. Like the United States, Canada's critical infrastructure consists
of physical and information technology facilities, networks,
services and assets essential to the health, safety, security or
economic well-being of its citizens, or to the effective functioning
of government. In many respects, the two countries should be viewed
as sharing the same infrastructure (pipelines, bridges, power and
phone lines) sprawling across a shared economic space. As in the
United States, it is estimated that most (between 85 and 95
percent)of Canada's critical infrastructure is owned and operated by
private sector firms, which therefore bear primary responsibility
for the development and implementation of business continuity plans.
In addition to the federal government's role, the provinces and
territories also have a significant jurisdictional role in critical
infrastructure protection and emergency management. These
government entities also own and regulate some critical
infrastructure.
¶3. Canada has established the National Critical Infrastructure
Assurance Program (NCIAP) - an ongoing collaboration between private
sector partners and federal, provincial and territorial governments
- to provide a national framework for cooperative action and to
build a resilient national critical infrastructure. The federal
government classifies critical infrastructure within ten sectors, as
opposed to the USG classification system of 17 critical
infrastructure/key resources sectors.
¶4. The 10 Canadian sectors are:
* Energy and Utilities (e.g., electrical power, natural gas, oil
production/transmission)
* Information and Communications Technology (e.g.,
telecommunications, broadcasting systems, software, hardware, and
networks including the Internet)
* Finance (e.g., large-value payment, securities clearing and
settlement systems)
* Health Care (e.g., hospitals, blood-supply facilities and
pharmaceutical manufacturers)
* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
Q* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
* Water (e.g., drinking water and wastewater management)
* Transportation (e.g., road, rail, marine, and aviation)
* Safety (e.g., chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear
safety, dangerous goods, search and rescue, emergency services and
dams)
* Government (e.g., services, facilities, information networks and
key national monuments)
* Manufacturing (e.g., defense industrial base, chemical industry)
Cooperation with the United States
¶5. At the federal government level, the Public Safety Canada is
responsible for national CI policy. Public Safety Canada works
primarily with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
(particularly with the Office of Critical Infrastructure Protection)
on the identification of shared CI, threat analysis and response
planning; since 2005, under the auspices of the SPP. We understand
that Public Safety Canada and DHS have recently collaborated on a
detailed threat analysis of shared CI. Post would welcome a copy.
Examples of Canadian Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources with
Potentially Significant U.S. Impact (USG Categories)
resources that we have compiled here is illustrative, not
exhaustive. Post believes that a more comprehensive listing might
be obtained from the Department of Homeland Security.
¶7. (U) This message was cleared with DHS Attach at Mission Canada.
OTTAWA 00000274 029 OF 029
¶1. Summary: The economies, societies and environments of Canada and
the United States are inextricably intertwined; the relationship is
most easily reflected in the staggering volume of bilateral trade --
over US$1.5 billion a day in goods - and the 300,000 people who
cross the shared border every day to work or visit. Moreover,
Canada is the single largest foreign supplier of fossil fuels to the
United States (providing 17 percent of U.S. oil imports and over 80
percent of U.S. natural gas imports). Our food and agriculture
markets are almost completely integrated, with Canada accounting for
about 20 percent of total US agri-food imports. In addition our two
countries' financial markets and telecommunications and electrical
networks are highly interconnected. As a consequence of this
exceptional interrelationship a disruption to Canada's critical
infrastructure (CI) could have an immediate and deleterious impact
on the United States. Because it would be virtually impossible to
provide an exhaustive accounting of Canada's CI, this cable gives
illustrative examples of CI in various sectors. Protection of CI is
a Canadian national priority, and Canada is a close and trusted
partner with the United States in working to protect CI in North
America. End summary.
Canada's Approach to CI
¶2. Like the United States, Canada's critical infrastructure consists
of physical and information technology facilities, networks,
services and assets essential to the health, safety, security or
economic well-being of its citizens, or to the effective functioning
of government. In many respects, the two countries should be viewed
as sharing the same infrastructure (pipelines, bridges, power and
phone lines) sprawling across a shared economic space. As in the
United States, it is estimated that most (between 85 and 95
percent)of Canada's critical infrastructure is owned and operated by
private sector firms, which therefore bear primary responsibility
for the development and implementation of business continuity plans.
In addition to the federal government's role, the provinces and
territories also have a significant jurisdictional role in critical
infrastructure protection and emergency management. These
government entities also own and regulate some critical
infrastructure.
¶3. Canada has established the National Critical Infrastructure
Assurance Program (NCIAP) - an ongoing collaboration between private
sector partners and federal, provincial and territorial governments
- to provide a national framework for cooperative action and to
build a resilient national critical infrastructure. The federal
government classifies critical infrastructure within ten sectors, as
opposed to the USG classification system of 17 critical
infrastructure/key resources sectors.
¶4. The 10 Canadian sectors are:
* Energy and Utilities (e.g., electrical power, natural gas, oil
production/transmission)
* Information and Communications Technology (e.g.,
telecommunications, broadcasting systems, software, hardware, and
networks including the Internet)
* Finance (e.g., large-value payment, securities clearing and
settlement systems)
* Health Care (e.g., hospitals, blood-supply facilities and
pharmaceutical manufacturers)
* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
Q* Food (e.g., safety, distribution, agriculture and food industry)
* Water (e.g., drinking water and wastewater management)
* Transportation (e.g., road, rail, marine, and aviation)
* Safety (e.g., chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear
safety, dangerous goods, search and rescue, emergency services and
dams)
* Government (e.g., services, facilities, information networks and
key national monuments)
* Manufacturing (e.g., defense industrial base, chemical industry)
Cooperation with the United States
¶5. At the federal government level, the Public Safety Canada is
responsible for national CI policy. Public Safety Canada works
primarily with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
(particularly with the Office of Critical Infrastructure Protection)
on the identification of shared CI, threat analysis and response
planning; since 2005, under the auspices of the SPP. We understand
that Public Safety Canada and DHS have recently collaborated on a
detailed threat analysis of shared CI. Post would welcome a copy.
Examples of Canadian Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources with
Potentially Significant U.S. Impact (USG Categories)
Wilkins