

Currently released so far... 51122 / 251,287
Articles
Brazil
Sri Lanka
United Kingdom
Sweden
00. Editorial
United States
Latin America
Egypt
Jordan
Yemen
Thailand
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
2011/05/18
2011/05/19
2011/05/20
2011/05/21
2011/05/22
2011/05/23
2011/05/24
2011/05/25
2011/05/26
2011/05/27
2011/05/28
2011/05/29
2011/05/30
2011/05/31
2011/06/01
2011/06/02
2011/06/03
2011/06/04
2011/06/05
2011/06/06
2011/06/07
2011/06/08
2011/06/09
2011/06/10
2011/06/11
2011/06/12
2011/06/13
2011/06/14
2011/06/15
2011/06/16
2011/06/17
2011/06/18
2011/06/19
2011/06/20
2011/06/21
2011/06/22
2011/06/23
2011/06/24
2011/06/25
2011/06/26
2011/06/27
2011/06/28
2011/06/29
2011/06/30
2011/07/01
2011/07/02
2011/07/04
2011/07/05
2011/07/06
2011/07/07
2011/07/08
2011/07/10
2011/07/11
2011/07/12
2011/07/13
2011/07/14
2011/07/15
2011/07/16
2011/07/17
2011/07/18
2011/07/19
2011/07/20
2011/07/21
2011/07/22
2011/07/23
2011/07/25
2011/07/27
2011/07/28
2011/07/29
2011/07/31
2011/08/01
2011/08/02
2011/08/03
2011/08/05
2011/08/06
2011/08/07
2011/08/08
2011/08/09
2011/08/10
2011/08/11
2011/08/12
2011/08/13
2011/08/15
2011/08/16
2011/08/17
2011/08/18
2011/08/19
2011/08/21
2011/08/22
2011/08/23
2011/08/24
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Antananarivo
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Alexandria
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embasy Bonn
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Brazzaville
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangui
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Belfast
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Cotonou
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chiang Mai
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Chengdu
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
DIR FSINFATC
Consulate Dusseldorf
Consulate Durban
Consulate Dubai
Consulate Dhahran
Embassy Guatemala
Embassy Grenada
Embassy Georgetown
Embassy Gaborone
Consulate Guayaquil
Consulate Guangzhou
Consulate Guadalajara
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Hong Kong
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kolonia
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Krakow
Consulate Kolkata
Consulate Karachi
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Lusaka
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Lome
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy Libreville
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Leipzig
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Mission Geneva
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Mogadishu
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maseru
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Merida
Consulate Melbourne
Consulate Matamoros
Consulate Marseille
Embassy Nouakchott
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Nuevo Laredo
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Consulate Nagoya
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Praia
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Moresby
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Podgorica
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Hillah
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Surabaya
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy Tirana
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
Consulate Thessaloniki
USUN New York
USMISSION USTR GENEVA
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Mission CD Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
UN Rome
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vientiane
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AMGT
ASEC
AEMR
AR
APECO
AU
AORC
ADANA
AJ
AF
AFIN
AMED
AS
AM
ABLD
AFFAIRS
AMB
APER
ACOA
AND
AA
AE
AADP
AID
AO
AL
AG
AORD
ADM
AINF
AINT
ASEAN
AORG
ABT
APEC
AY
ASUP
ARF
AGOA
AVIAN
ATRN
ANET
AGIT
ASECVE
ABUD
AODE
ALOW
ADB
AN
ADPM
ASPA
ARABL
AFSN
AZ
AC
AIAG
AFSI
ASCE
ASIG
ACABQ
ADIP
AFGHANISTAN
AROC
ADCO
ACOTA
ANARCHISTS
AMEDCASCKFLO
AK
ARABBL
ASCH
ANTITERRORISM
AGRICULTURE
AOCR
ARR
ASSEMBLY
AORCYM
AFPK
ACKM
AGMT
AEC
APRC
AIN
AFPREL
ASFC
ASECTH
AFSA
AINR
AOPC
AFAF
AFARI
AX
ASECAF
ASECAFIN
AT
AFZAL
APCS
AGAO
AIT
ARCH
AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL
AMEX
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AORCD
AVIATION
ARAS
AINFCY
ACBAQ
AOPR
AREP
AOIC
ASEX
ASEK
AER
AGR
AMCT
AVERY
APR
AEMRS
AFU
AMG
ATPDEA
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AORL
ACS
AMCHAMS
AECL
AUC
ACAO
BA
BR
BB
BG
BEXP
BY
BRUSSELS
BU
BD
BTIO
BK
BL
BE
BMGT
BO
BM
BX
BN
BWC
BBSR
BTT
BC
BH
BILAT
BUSH
BHUM
BT
BTC
BMENA
BOND
BAIO
BP
BF
BRPA
BURNS
BUT
BBG
BCW
BOEHNER
BOL
BASHAR
BIDEN
BFIN
BZ
BEXPC
BTIU
CPAS
CA
CASC
CS
CBW
CIDA
CO
CODEL
CI
CROS
CU
CH
CWC
CMGT
CVIS
CDG
CTR
CG
CF
CHIEF
CJAN
CBSA
CE
CY
CB
CW
CM
CHR
CD
COE
CV
COUNTER
CT
CN
CPUOS
CTERR
CVR
CVPR
CDC
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CONS
COM
CACS
CR
CONTROLS
CAN
CACM
COMMERCE
CAMBODIA
CFIS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITES
CONDOLEEZZA
CZ
CTBT
CEN
CLINTON
CFED
CARC
CTM
CARICOM
CSW
CICTE
CYPRUS
CBE
CMGMT
CARSON
CWCM
CIVS
COUNTRYCLEARANCE
CENTCOM
CAPC
COPUOS
CKGR
CITEL
CQ
CITT
CIC
CARIB
CVIC
CAFTA
CVISU
CDB
CEDAW
CNC
CJUS
COMMAND
CENTER
COL
CAJC
CONSULAR
CLMT
CBC
CIA
CNARC
CIS
CEUDA
CHINA
CAC
CL
DR
DJ
DEMOCRATIC
DEMARCHE
DOMESTIC
DISENGAGEMENT
DB
DA
DHS
DAO
DCM
DAVID
DO
DEAX
DEFENSE
DEA
DTRO
DPRK
DOC
DTRA
DK
DAC
DOD
DRL
DRC
DCG
DE
DOT
DEPT
DOE
DS
DKEM
ECON
ETTC
EFIS
ETRD
EC
EMIN
EAGR
EAID
EFIN
EUN
ECIN
EG
EWWT
EINV
ENRG
ELAB
EPET
EIND
EN
EAIR
EUMEM
ECPS
ES
EI
ELTN
ET
EZ
EU
ER
EINT
ENGR
ECONOMIC
ENIV
EFTA
ETRN
EMS
EUREM
EPA
ESTH
EEB
EET
ENV
EAG
EXIM
ECTRD
ELNT
ENVIRONMENT
ECA
EAP
EINDIR
ETR
ECONOMY
ETRC
ELECTIONS
EICN
EXPORT
EARG
EGHG
EID
ETRO
EINF
EAIDHO
ECIP
EENV
EURM
EPEC
ERNG
ENERG
EIAD
EXBS
ED
EREL
ELAM
EK
EWT
ENGRD
EDEV
ECE
ENGY
EXIMOPIC
ETRDEC
ECCT
EUR
ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID
EFI
ECOSOC
EXTERNAL
ESCAP
ETCC
EENG
ERA
ENRD
ECLAC
ETRAD
EBRD
ENVR
ECONENRG
ELTNSNAR
ELAP
EPIT
EDUC
EAIDXMXAXBXFFR
EETC
EIVN
EDRC
EGOV
ETRA
EAIDRW
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ESA
ETRDGK
ENVI
ELN
EPRT
EPTED
ERTD
EUM
EAIDS
EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM
EDU
EV
EAIDAF
EDA
EPREL
EINVEFIN
EAGER
ETMIN
EUCOM
ECCP
EIDN
EINVKSCA
ENNP
EFINECONCS
ETC
EAIRASECCASCID
EINN
ETRP
ECONOMICS
ENERGY
EIAR
EINDETRD
ECONEFIN
EURN
ETRDEINVTINTCS
EFIM
ETIO
EATO
EIPR
EINVETC
ETTD
ETDR
EIQ
ECONCS
ENRGIZ
EAIG
ENTG
EUC
ERD
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECUN
FR
FI
FOREIGN
FARM
FIR
FAO
FK
FARC
FAS
FJ
FREEDOM
FAC
FINANCE
FBI
FTAA
FM
FCS
FAA
FORCE
FDA
FTA
FT
FCSC
FMGT
FINR
FIN
FDIC
FOR
FOI
FO
FMLN
FISO
GM
GERARD
GT
GA
GG
GR
GTIP
GH
GZ
GE
GB
GY
GAZA
GJ
GEORGE
GOI
GCC
GMUS
GI
GLOBAL
GV
GC
GL
GOV
GKGIC
GF
GWI
GIPNC
GUTIERREZ
GTMO
GANGS
GAERC
GUILLERMO
GASPAR
HR
HA
HYMPSK
HO
HK
HUMAN
HU
HN
HHS
HURI
HUD
HUMRIT
HUMANITARIAN
HUMANR
HL
HSTC
HILLARY
HCOPIL
HADLEY
HOURANI
HI
HUM
HEBRON
HUMOR
IZ
IN
IAEA
IS
IMO
ILO
IR
IC
IT
ITU
ID
IV
IMF
IBRD
IWC
ICAO
ICRC
INF
IO
IPR
ISO
IK
ISRAELI
IQ
ICES
IDB
INFLUENZA
IRAQI
ISCON
IGAD
IRAN
ITALY
IRAQ
ICTY
ICTR
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IQNV
IADB
INTERNAL
INMARSAT
IRDB
ILC
INCB
INRB
ICJ
ISRAEL
INR
IEA
ISPA
ICCAT
IOM
ITRD
IHO
IL
IFAD
ITRA
IDLI
ISCA
INL
INRA
INTELSAT
ISAF
ISPL
IRS
IEF
ITER
INDO
IIP
IND
IEFIN
IACI
IAHRC
INNP
IA
INTERPOL
IFIN
ISSUES
IZPREL
IRAJ
IF
ITPHUM
ITA
IP
IRPE
IDA
ISLAMISTS
ITF
INRO
IBET
IDP
IRC
KMDR
KPAO
KOMC
KNNP
KFLO
KDEM
KSUM
KIPR
KFLU
KE
KCRM
KJUS
KAWC
KZ
KSCA
KDRG
KCOR
KGHG
KPAL
KTIP
KMCA
KCRS
KPKO
KOLY
KRVC
KVPR
KG
KWBG
KTER
KS
KN
KSPR
KWMN
KV
KTFN
KFRD
KU
KSTC
KSTH
KISL
KGIC
KSEP
KFIN
KTEX
KTIA
KUNR
KCMR
KCIP
KMOC
KTDB
KBIO
KBCT
KMPI
KSAF
KACT
KFEM
KPRV
KPWR
KIRC
KCFE
KRIM
KHIV
KHLS
KVIR
KNNNP
KCEM
KLIG
KIRF
KNUP
KSAC
KNUC
KPGOV
KTDD
KIDE
KOMS
KLFU
KNNC
KMFO
KSEO
KJRE
KJUST
KMRS
KSRE
KGIT
KPIR
KPOA
KUWAIT
KIVP
KICC
KSCS
KPOL
KSEAO
KRCM
KSCI
KNAP
KGLB
KICA
KCUL
KPRM
KFSC
KQ
KPOP
KPFO
KPALAOIS
KREC
KBWG
KR
KTTB
KNAR
KCOM
KESS
KINR
KOCI
KWN
KCSY
KREL
KTBT
KFTN
KW
KRFD
KFLOA
KHDP
KNEP
KIND
KHUM
KSKN
KOMO
KDRL
KTFIN
KSOC
KPO
KGIV
KSTCPL
KSI
KPRP
KFPC
KNNB
KNDP
KICCPUR
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KDMR
KFCE
KIMMITT
KMCC
KMNP
KSEC
KOMCSG
KGCC
KRAD
KCRP
KAUST
KWAWC
KCHG
KRDP
KPAS
KTIAPARM
KPAOPREL
KWGB
KIRP
KMIG
KLAB
KSEI
KHSA
KNPP
KPAONZ
KWWW
KGHA
KY
KCRIM
KCRCM
KGCN
KPLS
KIIP
KPAOY
KTRD
KTAO
KJU
KBTS
KWAC
KFIU
KNNO
KPAI
KILS
KPA
KRCS
KWBGSY
KNPPIS
KNNPMNUC
KNPT
KERG
KLTN
KPREL
KTLA
KO
KAWK
KVRP
KAID
KX
KENV
KWCI
KNPR
KCFC
KNEI
KFTFN
KTFM
KCERS
KDEMAF
KMEPI
KEMS
KBTR
KEDU
KIRL
KNNR
KMPT
KPDD
KPIN
KDEV
KFRP
KTBD
KMSG
KWWMN
KWBC
KA
KOM
KWNM
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KRGY
KNNF
KICR
KIFR
KWMNCS
KPAK
KDDG
KCGC
KID
KNSD
KMPF
KWMM
MARR
MX
MASS
MOPS
MNUC
MCAP
MTCRE
MRCRE
MTRE
MASC
MY
MK
MG
MU
MILI
MO
MZ
MEPP
MCC
MEDIA
MOPPS
MI
MAS
MW
MP
MEPN
MV
MD
MR
MC
MCA
MT
MIL
MARITIME
MOPSGRPARM
MAAR
MOOPS
ML
MA
MN
MNUCPTEREZ
MTCR
MUNC
MPOS
MONUC
MGMT
MURRAY
MACP
MINUSTAH
MCCONNELL
MGT
MNUR
MF
MEPI
MOHAMMAD
MAR
MAPP
MNU
MFA
MTS
MLS
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MED
MNVC
MIK
MBM
MILITARY
MAPS
MARAD
MDC
MACEDONIA
MASSMNUC
MUCN
MQADHAFI
MPS
NZ
NATO
NI
NO
NU
NG
NL
NPT
NS
NA
NP
NASA
NSF
NEA
NANCY
NSG
NRR
NATIONAL
NMNUC
NC
NSC
NAS
NARC
NELSON
NATEU
NDP
NIH
NK
NIPP
NR
NERG
NSSP
NE
NTDB
NT
NEGROPONTE
NGO
NATOIRAQ
NAR
NZUS
NCCC
NH
NAFTA
NEW
NRG
NUIN
NOVO
NATOPREL
NV
NICHOLAS
NPA
NSFO
NW
NORAD
NPG
NOAA
OPRC
OPDC
OTRA
OECD
OVIP
OREP
ODC
OIIP
OAS
OSCE
OPIC
OMS
OFDP
OFDA
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OSCI
OM
OPAD
ODPC
OIC
ODIP
OPPI
ORA
OCEA
OREG
OMIG
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXP
OPEC
OFPD
OAU
OCII
OIL
OVIPPRELUNGANU
OSHA
OPCD
OPCR
OF
OFDPQIS
OSIC
OHUM
OTR
OBSP
OGAC
OESC
OVP
ON
OES
OTAR
OCS
PREL
PGOV
PARM
PINR
PHUM
PM
PREF
PTER
PK
PINS
PBIO
PHSA
PE
PBTS
PA
PL
POL
PAK
POV
POLITICS
POLICY
PO
PRELTBIOBA
PKO
PIN
PNAT
PU
PGOVPREL
PALESTINIAN
PTERPGOV
PELOSI
PAS
PP
PTEL
PROP
PRELAF
PRHUM
PRE
PUNE
PIRF
PVOV
PROG
PERSONS
PROV
PKK
PRGOV
PH
PLAB
PDEM
PCI
PRL
PRM
PINSO
PERM
PETR
PPAO
PERL
PBS
PETERS
PRELBR
PCON
POLITICAL
PMIL
POLM
PKPA
PNUM
PLO
PTERM
PJUS
PARMP
PNIR
PHUMKPAL
PG
PREZ
PGIC
PAO
PROTECTION
PRELPK
PGOVENRG
PATTY
PSOC
PARTIES
PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ
PMIG
PAIGH
PARK
PETER
PHUS
PKPO
PGOVECON
POUS
PMAR
PWBG
PAR
PGOVGM
PHUH
PTE
PY
POLUN
PDOV
PGOVSOCI
PGOVPM
PRELEVU
PGOR
PBTSRU
PHUMA
PHUMR
PPD
PGV
PRAM
PARMS
PINL
PSI
PKPAL
PPA
PTERE
PGOF
PINO
PREO
PHAS
PAC
PRESL
PORG
PS
PGVO
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PINT
PRELP
PREFA
PNG
PTBS
PFOR
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PREK
PHJM
POLINT
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PECON
PEACE
PROCESS
PLN
PEDRO
PF
PGPV
PCUL
PGGV
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGIV
PHUMPREL
POGOV
PEL
PBT
PAMQ
PINF
PSEPC
POSTS
PAHO
PHUMPGOV
PGOC
PNR
RS
RP
RU
RW
RFE
RCMP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
REFORM
RO
ROW
ROBERT
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RELATIONS
RAY
ROBERTG
RIGHTS
RM
RATIFICATION
RREL
RBI
RICE
ROOD
REL
RODHAM
RGY
RUEHZO
RELIGIOUS
RELFREE
RUEUN
RELAM
RSP
RF
REO
REGIONAL
RUPREL
RI
REMON
RPEL
RSO
SCUL
SENV
SOCI
SZ
SNAR
SO
SP
SU
SY
SI
SMIG
SYR
SA
SW
SF
SR
SYRIA
SNARM
START
SPECIALIST
SG
SNIG
SCI
SGWI
SE
SIPDIS
SANC
SELAB
SN
SETTLEMENTS
SCIENCE
SENVENV
SENS
SPCE
SPAS
SECURITY
SENC
SOCIETY
SOSI
SENVEAGREAIDTBIOECONSOCIXR
SEN
SPECI
ST
SL
SENVCASCEAIDID
SC
SECRETARY
STR
SNA
SOCIS
SADC
SEP
SK
SHUM
SYAI
SMIL
STEPHEN
SNRV
SKCA
SENSITIVE
SECI
SCUD
SCRM
SGNV
SECTOR
SAARC
SENVSXE
SWMN
STEINBERG
SOPN
SOCR
SCRS
SWE
SARS
SNARIZ
SUDAN
SENVQGR
SAN
SM
SFNV
SSA
SPCVIS
SOFA
SCULKPAOECONTU
SENVKGHG
SHI
SEVN
SH
SNARCS
SNARN
SIPRS
TBIO
TW
TRGY
TSPA
TU
TPHY
TI
TX
TH
TIP
TSPL
TNGD
TZ
TS
TC
TK
TURKEY
TERRORISM
TPSL
TINT
TRSY
TERFIN
TPP
TT
TECHNOLOGY
TE
TAGS
TRAFFICKING
TJ
TN
TO
TD
TP
TREATY
TR
TA
TIO
TECH
TF
TRAD
TNDG
TWI
TPSA
TWL
TAUSCHER
TRBY
TL
TV
THPY
TSPAM
TREL
TRT
TNAR
TFIN
TWCH
THOMMA
THOMAS
TERROR
TRY
TBID
UK
UNESCO
UNSC
UNGA
UN
US
UZ
USEU
UG
UP
UNAUS
UNMIK
USTR
UY
USUN
UNEP
UNDC
UV
UNPUOS
UNSCR
USAID
UNODC
UNRCR
UNHCR
UNDP
UNCRIME
UA
UNHRC
UNRWA
UNO
UNCND
UNCHR
USAU
UNICEF
USPS
UNOMIG
UNESCOSCULPRELPHUMKPALCUIRXFVEKV
UR
UNFICYP
UNCITRAL
UNAMA
UNVIE
USTDA
USNC
UNCSD
USCC
UNEF
UNGAPL
USSC
UNMIC
UNTAC
UNCLASSIFIED
USDA
UNCTAD
USGS
UNFPA
UNSE
USOAS
UE
UAE
UNCHS
UNDESCO
UNC
UNSCS
UKXG
UNGACG
UNHR
UNBRO
UNCHC
UNFCYP
UNIDROIT
WHTI
WIPO
WTRO
WHO
WTO
WMO
WFP
WEET
WS
WE
WA
WHA
WBG
WILLIAM
WI
WSIS
WCL
WEBZ
WZ
WW
WWBG
WMD
WWT
WMN
WWARD
WITH
WTRQ
WCO
WEU
WB
WBEG
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 05FRANKFURT312, EU Financial Supervisory Framework: Standing on
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05FRANKFURT312.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
05FRANKFURT312 | 2005-01-13 12:01 | 2011-08-24 01:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Consulate Frankfurt |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 05 FRANKFURT 000312
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
STATE FOR EUR PDAS, EB, EUR/AGS, AND EUR/ERA
STATE PASS FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD
STATE PASS NSC
TREASURY ALSO FOR ICN COX, HULL
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ECON EFIN EUN
SUBJECT: EU Financial Supervisory Framework: Standing on
the Edge of the Future
This cable is sensitive but unclassified. Not/not for
Internet distribution.
¶1. (SBU) Summary: The EU-wide financial supervisory
framework created and made operational in less than three
years is about to come into its own. The three new
supervisory committees, the Committee of European Securities
Regulators (CESR), the Committee of European Banking
Supervisors (CEBS) and the Committee of European Insurance
and Occupational Insurance Supervisors (CEIOPS) will play a
central role in implementing recent legislation that has
basically retooled the EU financial services framework.
CESR, the oldest of the three, is leading the way. In one
paper CESR laid out its implementation activities and, in a
separate provocative think piece, asks the question, "What
if intensifying coordination among national supervisors is
not effective?" One possible answer: give "the Network" of
national supervisors legal and supervisory powers to deal
with trans-EU issues. This is like standing on the edge of
the future.
¶2. (SBU) The European financial industry has cut through
practical, legal and political niceties by calling for the
creation of a lead regulator. While this has attracted push
back from CEBS and the European Central Bank (ECB), the
recently approved Capital Adequacy Directive (CAD III)
incorporates the concept of "coordinating supervisor," a
possible step along the way to a lead supervisor. Ensuring
political accountability will be essential before the EU
progresses to a unified supervisor. The idea, however, is
irresistible to some. Deutsche Bank, for example, welcomes
the current trend and is dusting off its old piece: A
European Financial Supervisory Authority - A Matter of When,
Not If." End Summary
Committee Creation: Back Waters No Longer
-----------------------------------------
¶3. (SBU) In a short three and a half years CESR, CEBS, and
CEIOPS, each composed of all relevant member state
supervisors, have been created and become operational. CESR
was the first. Created in June 2001, CESR was conceived
upon a recommendation by a group of wise men led by
Alexander Lamfalussy (the Lamfalussy Group). Lamfalussy,
who headed up the precursor to the ECB, reasoned that
knitting European financial markets closer together would
require a flexible regulatory process to respond to dynamic
markets and close cooperation among national supervisors to
ensure uniform implementation on a pan-EU scale. Finance
Ministers replicated this basic approach in agreeing at the
end of 2002 to create CEBS and CEIOPS. Like CESR, CEBS and
CEIOPS were matched by regulatory committees composed of
Finance Ministry representatives. The Financial Services
Committee, which reports to ECOFIN, takes an overview and
sets strategic directions. Details of CEBS and CEIOPS took
a while to resolve. Both opened their doors for business in
the fall of 2004.
¶4. (SBU) Granted, each of these committees had precursors.
What is different is that they all have a formal role in
providing advice to the Commission on Financial Legislation
and Regulation, and in ensuring consistent implementation of
EU legislation in member states. The European Council's
Stockholm Resolution that gave birth to CESR states that
"national regulators and CESR should also play an important
role in the transposition process by securing more effective
cooperation between supervisory authorities carrying out
peer reviews and promoting best practices, so as to ensure
more consistent and timely implementation of community
legislation in member states." Precursor supervisory
committees were largely voluntary, with no space or only a
small space in the formal EU regulatory framework. All this
is about to change.
Long "To Do List:" Implementation Begins
----------------------------------------
¶5. (SBU) Implementation of legislation now has become the
focal point for EU financial services activities. The
Financial Services Action Plan has retooled basic elements
of EU securities legislation and now will have to be
implemented. CESR is helping with the implementation of the
Market Abuse and Prospectus Directives, the Regulation on
International Accounting Standards, and amendments to the
Directive on Undertakings in Collective Investments in
Transferable Securities (UCITS). In the wings is
implementation for the more recently adopted Directives on
Markets in Financial Instruments (MiFID) and on
Transparency.
¶6. (SBU) Even though their legislative list is not as long
as CESR's, the other two committees will have responsibility
for implementing major new directives. CEBS is beginning
its implementation work for the Capital Adequacy Directive
(CAD III) that will fundamentally change risk capital
assessments for financial institutions. CAD III is being
finalized by the Council and is pending in the European
Parliament. CEBS is designing a common reporting framework
for capital requirements and the solvency ratio, has
published draft guidelines on the supervisory review
process, and introduced "prudential filters" aimed at
neutralizing the effects of new accounting standards on
regulatory capital. CEIOPS is gearing up to provide advice
for the Commission's major rewrite of capital adequacy rules
for insurance firms (Solvency II). The Commission is likely
to make a proposal in 2006 or early 2007.
Implementation: Where the Rubber Hits the Road
--------------------------------------------- --
¶7. (SBU) The logic of an integrated financial market is that
all players to follow the same rules. This can help ensure
healthy competition and a relatively efficient allocation of
capital. In highly competitive and regulated financial
markets, this also implies that the rules be enforced in the
same way. Lax enforcement might be considered to gain a
competitive advantage, like an "off-shore" financial center.
Such an approach would put a quick end to "mutual
recognition" of one member state's supervisory surveillance
by another, the cornerstone of the internal market.
¶8. (SBU) CESR has done the most public thinking on this
topic. In a paper released at the end of October, CESR used
three groups to categorize its implementation functions (so-
called "Level 3" functions, Level 1 being the directives,
Level 2 being the implementing measures regulations or
follow up directives, and Level 3 being the nitty gritty of
issuing rule books and supervisory guidance explaining how
firms are expected to comply with the directives and
regulations). These are: (1) coordinated implementation of
EU law; (2) regulatory convergence; and (3) supervisory
convergence.
¶9. (SBU) Coordinated implementation involves the legal
transposition of directives into national laws and their day-
to-day application. CESR has established a Review Panel to
carry out peer reviews using correspondence tables detailing
how directives are being implemented in each member state.
CESR members are to provide a self-assessment on their
implementation. The Review Panel will offer an opinion and
suggestions for common approaches to implementation. The
correspondence tables, assessments and opinions would be
made public. To ensure consistent enforcement in all member
states CESR has recommended that CESR members be granted
equivalent rulemaking and enforcement powers by their
respective national authorities.
¶10. (SBU) Regulatory convergence is defined by CESR as
creating common approaches. Each supervisor takes decisions
that create a body of jurisprudence in its jurisdiction.
Acting together, CESR notes that its members can decide on
common approaches that could be memorialized in meeting
minutes, indicative guidance, or regulatory recommendations.
These would not have the status of EU law, but be
implemented on a "voluntary basis" by all supervisors.
Areas that are subject to such regulatory convergence need
not be covered by EU law, in CESR's opinion. CESR's recent
standards on clearing and settlement developed together with
the ECB are an example. CESR also has worked on guidelines
on implementation of the Market Abuse and Prospectuses
Directive and has begun work on guidance for certain mutual
fund issues.
¶11. (SBU) Supervisory convergence relates to how supervisors
approach the practical operation of rules and legislation.
This means strengthened cooperation in practical ways. One
is to pull together provisions in directives that mandate
mutual recognition and cooperation into one consolidated
text. CESR thinks this would serve as the basis to handle
all situations requiring cooperation among supervisors. In
another practical implementation measure, CESR plans to set
up a "mediation mechanism by its peers" to provide an
acceptable solution where "home" and "host" supervisors
disagree. Joint supervisory visits and investigations by
CESR members and compiling "EU jurisprudence" in a database
of national decisions are other CESR initiatives to
strengthen cooperation and, thereby, supervisory
convergence.
¶12. (SBU) CESR develops these ideas further in another,
provocative thought piece entitled "Preliminary Progress
Report: Which Supervisory Tools for the EU Securities
Markets?" This paper, referred to as the "Himalayas
Report," given its lofty perspectives, elaborates the three
categories of implementation functions cited above. CESR
sets the tone by proclaiming its "serious objective" is to
"enhance its role as the `supervisor of national
supervisors.'" In this regard CESR suggests that its
network of supervisors might consider more systematic peer
reviews on member state implementation with "mission teams"
making assessments and CESR publishing results where
implementation is inadequate.
¶13. (SBU) A more robust mediation mechanism could require
mediation where there are disagreements or lack of
cooperation among supervisors.
¶14. (SBU) In the Himalaya paper CESR ventures onto the area
of supervision of trans-European activities, such as
investment firms, raising questions as to whether
cooperation can be efficiently executed by many separate
authorities, particularly in a financial crisis situation.
Other areas demanding a possible pan-EU approach include
public offerings, standard mutual funds, the application of
accounting standards for listed companies, the regulation of
credit rating agencies, and trans-European market
infrastructures (exchanges and clearing and settlement
systems). CESR muses whether its network should take single
EU decisions on such matters. Backing up a bit from the
edge, CESR reflects that a "trans-national" option is risky
and should not be attempted unless the present system cannot
provide proper solutions to supervisory convergence.
Different local laws, regulatory powers and jurisdictions,
and political accountability at the EU level present real
obstacles to a pan-EU solution.
Industry: Leading the Way to the Lead Supervisor?
--------------------------------------------- ----
¶15. (SBU) The European Financial Services Roundtable (EFSR)
cuts through the worrisome details and recommends that the
trans-national option be exercised now, calling for a "lead
supervisor for prudential supervision of cross-border
financial institutions." The EFSR proposes that the lead
supervisor would be the single point of contact for the
financial institution within the prudential supervisory
framework, receiving all reports, validating and authorizing
internal models, approving capital and liquidity allocation,
and approving cross-border set up of specific functions.
Local supervisors would be involved in supervision based on
delegated authority from the lead supervisor. The lead and
local supervisors would set up "colleges" to advise the lead
supervisor, and the relevant supervisory committees, such as
CEBS, could mediate any disagreements. In the Roundtable's
opinion, the lead supervisory regime will not only improve
the quality of supervision at an acceptable cost, but also
be an important catalyst for convergence of supervision
towards best practices.
Dutch Nudge: Just Thinking Out Loud
-----------------------------------
¶16. (SBU) The Dutch Presidency gave the notion of lead
supervision a bit of a nudge. In a November seminar on
"Enhancing Supervisory Convergence," Dutch Finance Minister
Zalm raised questions as to whether present coordinating
mechanisms were effective, delivering as promised, and
efficient. He opined that different supervisory practices
in different member states can "cause market distortions."
Good supervisory arrangements, in his judgment, should
stimulate rather than hamper the integration of European
financial markets. Noting that national supervisors can
only operate under national mandates, he mused whether there
should be "thinking about more European solutions for
supervision of truly European financial groups. Although we
should not try to cause a revolution here, we are likely to
see an evolution towards more European supervisory
structures."
CAD III Coordinating Supervisor: Planting the Seed
--------------------------------------------- ------
¶17. (SBU) The proposed CAD III contains a potential seed for
a lead supervisor. According to the Commission's proposal
draft, the coordinating supervisor is the member state
authority that has responsibility for supervision of a
financial institution on a consolidated basis. This
supervisor needs to work with other relevant authorities of
jurisdictions in which the institution is present to
validate technical aspects of CAD III. Such aspects include
the risk-weighted exposure amounts using the Internal
Ratings Based Approach, the estimates of loss given
defaults, and the use of Advanced Measurement Approaches
based on internal risk measurement systems. However, if no
agreement is reached within six months among the
coordinating and other competent supervisors, the
coordinating supervisor can make its own determination.
That determination will apply to the entire institution
throughout the EU.
¶18. (SBU) This approach encountered opposition. A member of
the Bundesbank board, for example, was adamantly opposed,
citing national responsibility for subsidiaries of parent
institutions located in other member states. The ECB,
however, did not resist. It observed that there is a large
gap between what the lead supervisor championed by industry
and the coordinating supervisor envisioned in CAD III.
Nonetheless, the challenge is apparent.
¶19. (SBU) The Chairman of CEBS, Jose Maria Roldan, has taken
up that challenge. He does not share EFSR's view,
explaining that rather than having a "one-stop-shop," a
"more pragmatic approach is needed" within the present
institutional framework. Indeed, CEBS staff believe that
their main objective is to show that more intensive
cooperation is the solution. German Finance Ministry
officials, however, believe the coordinating supervisor
concept in CAD III as a step toward a single EU supervisor.
A Dutch supervisor put it another way: if a coordinating
supervisor approach cannot be made to be effective, then the
option of going straight to an EU supervisory authority will
gain currency.
Got the Move, But Not the Political Touch
-----------------------------------------
¶20. (SBU) In the end, politics hold the key to any trans-EU
solutions. The Chairman of the European Parliament's
Economic and Monetary Affairs Committee livened up CESR's
December gala by lamented the "democratic deficit" of some
of CESR's ideas. Who is in charge of CESR? CESR is
sensitive to this issue. In its Himalaya paper CESR noted
that it is "firmly determined to develop its political and
democratic accountability links vis--vis the Finance
Services Committee, the European Commission and the European
Parliament."
¶21. (SBU) The Inter-Institutional Monitoring Group (IIMG)
also is cautious about the politics and the EU
"institutional balance," meaning power sharing between the
Commission, Parliament and Member States in the Council.
The IIMG, composed of representatives from all three EU
institutions, has endorsed coordinated implementation,
supervisory convergence and CESR's proposed mediation
mechanism. On regulatory convergence, however, it was "more
reserved." The IIMG worried that the "multiplication of non-
binding rules at Level 3 should not lead to a gray area
where legal certainty is absent and political accountability
is unclear."
¶22. (SBU) The draft Constitutional Treaty addressed some of
the political questions. Article 35 would give the European
Parliament the right to block the entry into force of
regulations delegated to the Commission in directives, power
that the Parliament now has only by the grace of a political
understanding with the Council. The Constitution also
states "where uniform conditions for implementing binding
Union acts are needed, those acts may confer implementing
powers on the Commission." There is no mention of
Parliament's role or of the accountability of supervisory
authorities, so some questions still appear to be open.
Comment:
--------
¶23. (SBU) If process defines outcomes, the implementation
phase of EU-wide financial service legislation will be an
interesting process. Getting the politics right is
essential. The power of the idea of regulatory convergence
would seem irresistible for those that wish the EU to be
truly an integrated financial market. The questions raised
by CESR and Dutch Finance Minister Zalm on the limits of
national supervisors coordinating to oversee pan-EU
activities are unavoidable. Officials at Deutsche Bank
welcome the trend of the current thinking. They are dusting
off their old think piece: "European Financial Service
Authority - A Matter of When, Not If."
¶24. (U) This report coordinated with Embassies Berlin and
The Hague and USEU Brussels.
¶25. (U) POC: James Wallar, Treasury Representative, e-mail
wallarjg2@state.gov; tel. 49-(69)-7535-2431, fax 49-(69)-
7535-2238
Bodde