Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 51122 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 04THEHAGUE1690, DUTCH PARLIAMENT ENDORSES GOVERNMENT'S PRT DECISION

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #04THEHAGUE1690.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
04THEHAGUE1690 2004-07-06 14:50 2011-08-24 01:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy The Hague
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS THE HAGUE 001690 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: MOPS MARR PREL PGOV AF NL NATO
SUBJECT: DUTCH PARLIAMENT ENDORSES GOVERNMENT'S PRT DECISION 
 
REF: The Hague 1240 
 
1. (U) On July 5 the Dutch Parliament broadly endorsed a 
recent Cabinet decision to lead a Provincial Reconstruction 
Team (PRT) in Baghlan, Afghanistan.  Only the small far-left 
Socialist Party opposed the mission.  The operation, 
announced in a June 28 government letter to parliament, will 
consist of approximately 150 troops to be deployed initially 
for one year beginning on September 1.  The PRT will be made 
up of three Military Observation and Liaison Teams (MOLT), 
an operations center, a separate protection unit that can 
act as a rapid reaction force and logistic elements 
including medical support. 
 
2. (U) Some parties in parliament only reluctantly supported 
the deployment citing concerns over Dutch troops' safety and 
questions as to the mission's purpose.  Defense Minister 
Kamp claimed he had engaged in "tough" negotiations to 
secure Baghlan for the Dutch because "it is relatively quiet 
there."  Despite parliamentary skepticism on this point, the 
fact that the PRT will be part of a NATO operation persuaded 
the majority.  The government also gave assurances that in 
extremis Dutch troops could seek assistance from the U.S., 
Britain and Germany. 
 
3. (U) MPs pressed Kamp to define the purpose of the Baghlan 
mission.  Kamp conceded Dutch troops would not be 
responsible for guaranteeing security in the province, 
stating that was the job of local authorities.  He also said 
Dutch troops are not to engage in counter-narcotics 
operations as that would cause too much friction with local 
warlords.  In general, he suggested the presence of foreign 
troops in Afghanistan has been conducive to stability, 
reconstruction efforts, and refugee returns.  Kamp specified 
that Dutch troops are to mediate in conflicts, cooperate 
with local police, assist relief organizations, help prepare 
for elections, and collect information for both NATO forces 
and the government in Kabul. 
 
4. (SBU) Comment:  This debate featured the standard 
parliamentary concerns on all Dutch post-Srebrenica military 
deployments, i.e., how dangerous will it be for Dutch forces 
and who will provide in extremis support should things go 
awry?  Dutch governments regularly have to reassure 
parliament on these points to gain endorsement for any 
overseas military missions.  End comment. 
 
Sobel