

Currently released so far... 51122 / 251,287
Articles
Brazil
Sri Lanka
United Kingdom
Sweden
00. Editorial
United States
Latin America
Egypt
Jordan
Yemen
Thailand
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
2011/05/18
2011/05/19
2011/05/20
2011/05/21
2011/05/22
2011/05/23
2011/05/24
2011/05/25
2011/05/26
2011/05/27
2011/05/28
2011/05/29
2011/05/30
2011/05/31
2011/06/01
2011/06/02
2011/06/03
2011/06/04
2011/06/05
2011/06/06
2011/06/07
2011/06/08
2011/06/09
2011/06/10
2011/06/11
2011/06/12
2011/06/13
2011/06/14
2011/06/15
2011/06/16
2011/06/17
2011/06/18
2011/06/19
2011/06/20
2011/06/21
2011/06/22
2011/06/23
2011/06/24
2011/06/25
2011/06/26
2011/06/27
2011/06/28
2011/06/29
2011/06/30
2011/07/01
2011/07/02
2011/07/04
2011/07/05
2011/07/06
2011/07/07
2011/07/08
2011/07/10
2011/07/11
2011/07/12
2011/07/13
2011/07/14
2011/07/15
2011/07/16
2011/07/17
2011/07/18
2011/07/19
2011/07/20
2011/07/21
2011/07/22
2011/07/23
2011/07/25
2011/07/27
2011/07/28
2011/07/29
2011/07/31
2011/08/01
2011/08/02
2011/08/03
2011/08/05
2011/08/06
2011/08/07
2011/08/08
2011/08/09
2011/08/10
2011/08/11
2011/08/12
2011/08/13
2011/08/15
2011/08/16
2011/08/17
2011/08/18
2011/08/19
2011/08/21
2011/08/22
2011/08/23
2011/08/24
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Antananarivo
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Alexandria
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embasy Bonn
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Brazzaville
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangui
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Belfast
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Cotonou
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chiang Mai
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Chengdu
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
DIR FSINFATC
Consulate Dusseldorf
Consulate Durban
Consulate Dubai
Consulate Dhahran
Embassy Guatemala
Embassy Grenada
Embassy Georgetown
Embassy Gaborone
Consulate Guayaquil
Consulate Guangzhou
Consulate Guadalajara
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Hong Kong
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kolonia
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Krakow
Consulate Kolkata
Consulate Karachi
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Lusaka
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Lome
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy Libreville
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Leipzig
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Mission Geneva
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Mogadishu
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maseru
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Merida
Consulate Melbourne
Consulate Matamoros
Consulate Marseille
Embassy Nouakchott
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Nuevo Laredo
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Consulate Nagoya
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Praia
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Moresby
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Podgorica
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Hillah
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Surabaya
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy Tirana
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
Consulate Thessaloniki
USUN New York
USMISSION USTR GENEVA
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Mission CD Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
UN Rome
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vientiane
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AMGT
ASEC
AEMR
AR
APECO
AU
AORC
ADANA
AJ
AF
AFIN
AMED
AS
AM
ABLD
AFFAIRS
AMB
APER
ACOA
AND
AA
AE
AADP
AID
AO
AL
AG
AORD
ADM
AINF
AINT
ASEAN
AORG
ABT
APEC
AY
ASUP
ARF
AGOA
AVIAN
ATRN
ANET
AGIT
ASECVE
ABUD
AODE
ALOW
ADB
AN
ADPM
ASPA
ARABL
AFSN
AZ
AC
AIAG
AFSI
ASCE
ASIG
ACABQ
ADIP
AFGHANISTAN
AROC
ADCO
ACOTA
ANARCHISTS
AMEDCASCKFLO
AK
ARABBL
ASCH
ANTITERRORISM
AGRICULTURE
AOCR
ARR
ASSEMBLY
AORCYM
AFPK
ACKM
AGMT
AEC
APRC
AIN
AFPREL
ASFC
ASECTH
AFSA
AINR
AOPC
AFAF
AFARI
AX
ASECAF
ASECAFIN
AT
AFZAL
APCS
AGAO
AIT
ARCH
AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL
AMEX
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AORCD
AVIATION
ARAS
AINFCY
ACBAQ
AOPR
AREP
AOIC
ASEX
ASEK
AER
AGR
AMCT
AVERY
APR
AEMRS
AFU
AMG
ATPDEA
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AORL
ACS
AMCHAMS
AECL
AUC
ACAO
BA
BR
BB
BG
BEXP
BY
BRUSSELS
BU
BD
BTIO
BK
BL
BE
BMGT
BO
BM
BX
BN
BWC
BBSR
BTT
BC
BH
BILAT
BUSH
BHUM
BT
BTC
BMENA
BOND
BAIO
BP
BF
BRPA
BURNS
BUT
BBG
BCW
BOEHNER
BOL
BASHAR
BIDEN
BFIN
BZ
BEXPC
BTIU
CPAS
CA
CASC
CS
CBW
CIDA
CO
CODEL
CI
CROS
CU
CH
CWC
CMGT
CVIS
CDG
CTR
CG
CF
CHIEF
CJAN
CBSA
CE
CY
CB
CW
CM
CHR
CD
COE
CV
COUNTER
CT
CN
CPUOS
CTERR
CVR
CVPR
CDC
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CONS
COM
CACS
CR
CONTROLS
CAN
CACM
COMMERCE
CAMBODIA
CFIS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITES
CONDOLEEZZA
CZ
CTBT
CEN
CLINTON
CFED
CARC
CTM
CARICOM
CSW
CICTE
CYPRUS
CBE
CMGMT
CARSON
CWCM
CIVS
COUNTRYCLEARANCE
CENTCOM
CAPC
COPUOS
CKGR
CITEL
CQ
CITT
CIC
CARIB
CVIC
CAFTA
CVISU
CDB
CEDAW
CNC
CJUS
COMMAND
CENTER
COL
CAJC
CONSULAR
CLMT
CBC
CIA
CNARC
CIS
CEUDA
CHINA
CAC
CL
DR
DJ
DEMOCRATIC
DEMARCHE
DOMESTIC
DISENGAGEMENT
DB
DA
DHS
DAO
DCM
DAVID
DO
DEAX
DEFENSE
DEA
DTRO
DPRK
DOC
DTRA
DK
DAC
DOD
DRL
DRC
DCG
DE
DOT
DEPT
DOE
DS
DKEM
ECON
ETTC
EFIS
ETRD
EC
EMIN
EAGR
EAID
EFIN
EUN
ECIN
EG
EWWT
EINV
ENRG
ELAB
EPET
EIND
EN
EAIR
EUMEM
ECPS
ES
EI
ELTN
ET
EZ
EU
ER
EINT
ENGR
ECONOMIC
ENIV
EFTA
ETRN
EMS
EUREM
EPA
ESTH
EEB
EET
ENV
EAG
EXIM
ECTRD
ELNT
ENVIRONMENT
ECA
EAP
EINDIR
ETR
ECONOMY
ETRC
ELECTIONS
EICN
EXPORT
EARG
EGHG
EID
ETRO
EINF
EAIDHO
ECIP
EENV
EURM
EPEC
ERNG
ENERG
EIAD
EXBS
ED
EREL
ELAM
EK
EWT
ENGRD
EDEV
ECE
ENGY
EXIMOPIC
ETRDEC
ECCT
EUR
ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID
EFI
ECOSOC
EXTERNAL
ESCAP
ETCC
EENG
ERA
ENRD
ECLAC
ETRAD
EBRD
ENVR
ECONENRG
ELTNSNAR
ELAP
EPIT
EDUC
EAIDXMXAXBXFFR
EETC
EIVN
EDRC
EGOV
ETRA
EAIDRW
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ESA
ETRDGK
ENVI
ELN
EPRT
EPTED
ERTD
EUM
EAIDS
EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM
EDU
EV
EAIDAF
EDA
EPREL
EINVEFIN
EAGER
ETMIN
EUCOM
ECCP
EIDN
EINVKSCA
ENNP
EFINECONCS
ETC
EAIRASECCASCID
EINN
ETRP
ECONOMICS
ENERGY
EIAR
EINDETRD
ECONEFIN
EURN
ETRDEINVTINTCS
EFIM
ETIO
EATO
EIPR
EINVETC
ETTD
ETDR
EIQ
ECONCS
ENRGIZ
EAIG
ENTG
EUC
ERD
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECUN
FR
FI
FOREIGN
FARM
FIR
FAO
FK
FARC
FAS
FJ
FREEDOM
FAC
FINANCE
FBI
FTAA
FM
FCS
FAA
FORCE
FDA
FTA
FT
FCSC
FMGT
FINR
FIN
FDIC
FOR
FOI
FO
FMLN
FISO
GM
GERARD
GT
GA
GG
GR
GTIP
GH
GZ
GE
GB
GY
GAZA
GJ
GEORGE
GOI
GCC
GMUS
GI
GLOBAL
GV
GC
GL
GOV
GKGIC
GF
GWI
GIPNC
GUTIERREZ
GTMO
GANGS
GAERC
GUILLERMO
GASPAR
HR
HA
HYMPSK
HO
HK
HUMAN
HU
HN
HHS
HURI
HUD
HUMRIT
HUMANITARIAN
HUMANR
HL
HSTC
HILLARY
HCOPIL
HADLEY
HOURANI
HI
HUM
HEBRON
HUMOR
IZ
IN
IAEA
IS
IMO
ILO
IR
IC
IT
ITU
ID
IV
IMF
IBRD
IWC
ICAO
ICRC
INF
IO
IPR
ISO
IK
ISRAELI
IQ
ICES
IDB
INFLUENZA
IRAQI
ISCON
IGAD
IRAN
ITALY
IRAQ
ICTY
ICTR
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IQNV
IADB
INTERNAL
INMARSAT
IRDB
ILC
INCB
INRB
ICJ
ISRAEL
INR
IEA
ISPA
ICCAT
IOM
ITRD
IHO
IL
IFAD
ITRA
IDLI
ISCA
INL
INRA
INTELSAT
ISAF
ISPL
IRS
IEF
ITER
INDO
IIP
IND
IEFIN
IACI
IAHRC
INNP
IA
INTERPOL
IFIN
ISSUES
IZPREL
IRAJ
IF
ITPHUM
ITA
IP
IRPE
IDA
ISLAMISTS
ITF
INRO
IBET
IDP
IRC
KMDR
KPAO
KOMC
KNNP
KFLO
KDEM
KSUM
KIPR
KFLU
KE
KCRM
KJUS
KAWC
KZ
KSCA
KDRG
KCOR
KGHG
KPAL
KTIP
KMCA
KCRS
KPKO
KOLY
KRVC
KVPR
KG
KWBG
KTER
KS
KN
KSPR
KWMN
KV
KTFN
KFRD
KU
KSTC
KSTH
KISL
KGIC
KSEP
KFIN
KTEX
KTIA
KUNR
KCMR
KCIP
KMOC
KTDB
KBIO
KBCT
KMPI
KSAF
KACT
KFEM
KPRV
KPWR
KIRC
KCFE
KRIM
KHIV
KHLS
KVIR
KNNNP
KCEM
KLIG
KIRF
KNUP
KSAC
KNUC
KPGOV
KTDD
KIDE
KOMS
KLFU
KNNC
KMFO
KSEO
KJRE
KJUST
KMRS
KSRE
KGIT
KPIR
KPOA
KUWAIT
KIVP
KICC
KSCS
KPOL
KSEAO
KRCM
KSCI
KNAP
KGLB
KICA
KCUL
KPRM
KFSC
KQ
KPOP
KPFO
KPALAOIS
KREC
KBWG
KR
KTTB
KNAR
KCOM
KESS
KINR
KOCI
KWN
KCSY
KREL
KTBT
KFTN
KW
KRFD
KFLOA
KHDP
KNEP
KIND
KHUM
KSKN
KOMO
KDRL
KTFIN
KSOC
KPO
KGIV
KSTCPL
KSI
KPRP
KFPC
KNNB
KNDP
KICCPUR
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KDMR
KFCE
KIMMITT
KMCC
KMNP
KSEC
KOMCSG
KGCC
KRAD
KCRP
KAUST
KWAWC
KCHG
KRDP
KPAS
KTIAPARM
KPAOPREL
KWGB
KIRP
KMIG
KLAB
KSEI
KHSA
KNPP
KPAONZ
KWWW
KGHA
KY
KCRIM
KCRCM
KGCN
KPLS
KIIP
KPAOY
KTRD
KTAO
KJU
KBTS
KWAC
KFIU
KNNO
KPAI
KILS
KPA
KRCS
KWBGSY
KNPPIS
KNNPMNUC
KNPT
KERG
KLTN
KPREL
KTLA
KO
KAWK
KVRP
KAID
KX
KENV
KWCI
KNPR
KCFC
KNEI
KFTFN
KTFM
KCERS
KDEMAF
KMEPI
KEMS
KBTR
KEDU
KIRL
KNNR
KMPT
KPDD
KPIN
KDEV
KFRP
KTBD
KMSG
KWWMN
KWBC
KA
KOM
KWNM
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KRGY
KNNF
KICR
KIFR
KWMNCS
KPAK
KDDG
KCGC
KID
KNSD
KMPF
KWMM
MARR
MX
MASS
MOPS
MNUC
MCAP
MTCRE
MRCRE
MTRE
MASC
MY
MK
MG
MU
MILI
MO
MZ
MEPP
MCC
MEDIA
MOPPS
MI
MAS
MW
MP
MEPN
MV
MD
MR
MC
MCA
MT
MIL
MARITIME
MOPSGRPARM
MAAR
MOOPS
ML
MA
MN
MNUCPTEREZ
MTCR
MUNC
MPOS
MONUC
MGMT
MURRAY
MACP
MINUSTAH
MCCONNELL
MGT
MNUR
MF
MEPI
MOHAMMAD
MAR
MAPP
MNU
MFA
MTS
MLS
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MED
MNVC
MIK
MBM
MILITARY
MAPS
MARAD
MDC
MACEDONIA
MASSMNUC
MUCN
MQADHAFI
MPS
NZ
NATO
NI
NO
NU
NG
NL
NPT
NS
NA
NP
NASA
NSF
NEA
NANCY
NSG
NRR
NATIONAL
NMNUC
NC
NSC
NAS
NARC
NELSON
NATEU
NDP
NIH
NK
NIPP
NR
NERG
NSSP
NE
NTDB
NT
NEGROPONTE
NGO
NATOIRAQ
NAR
NZUS
NCCC
NH
NAFTA
NEW
NRG
NUIN
NOVO
NATOPREL
NV
NICHOLAS
NPA
NSFO
NW
NORAD
NPG
NOAA
OPRC
OPDC
OTRA
OECD
OVIP
OREP
ODC
OIIP
OAS
OSCE
OPIC
OMS
OFDP
OFDA
OEXC
OPCW
OIE
OSCI
OM
OPAD
ODPC
OIC
ODIP
OPPI
ORA
OCEA
OREG
OMIG
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXP
OPEC
OFPD
OAU
OCII
OIL
OVIPPRELUNGANU
OSHA
OPCD
OPCR
OF
OFDPQIS
OSIC
OHUM
OTR
OBSP
OGAC
OESC
OVP
ON
OES
OTAR
OCS
PREL
PGOV
PARM
PINR
PHUM
PM
PREF
PTER
PK
PINS
PBIO
PHSA
PE
PBTS
PA
PL
POL
PAK
POV
POLITICS
POLICY
PO
PRELTBIOBA
PKO
PIN
PNAT
PU
PGOVPREL
PALESTINIAN
PTERPGOV
PELOSI
PAS
PP
PTEL
PROP
PRELAF
PRHUM
PRE
PUNE
PIRF
PVOV
PROG
PERSONS
PROV
PKK
PRGOV
PH
PLAB
PDEM
PCI
PRL
PRM
PINSO
PERM
PETR
PPAO
PERL
PBS
PETERS
PRELBR
PCON
POLITICAL
PMIL
POLM
PKPA
PNUM
PLO
PTERM
PJUS
PARMP
PNIR
PHUMKPAL
PG
PREZ
PGIC
PAO
PROTECTION
PRELPK
PGOVENRG
PATTY
PSOC
PARTIES
PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ
PMIG
PAIGH
PARK
PETER
PHUS
PKPO
PGOVECON
POUS
PMAR
PWBG
PAR
PGOVGM
PHUH
PTE
PY
POLUN
PDOV
PGOVSOCI
PGOVPM
PRELEVU
PGOR
PBTSRU
PHUMA
PHUMR
PPD
PGV
PRAM
PARMS
PINL
PSI
PKPAL
PPA
PTERE
PGOF
PINO
PREO
PHAS
PAC
PRESL
PORG
PS
PGVO
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PINT
PRELP
PREFA
PNG
PTBS
PFOR
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PREK
PHJM
POLINT
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PECON
PEACE
PROCESS
PLN
PEDRO
PF
PGPV
PCUL
PGGV
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGIV
PHUMPREL
POGOV
PEL
PBT
PAMQ
PINF
PSEPC
POSTS
PAHO
PHUMPGOV
PGOC
PNR
RS
RP
RU
RW
RFE
RCMP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
REFORM
RO
ROW
ROBERT
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RELATIONS
RAY
ROBERTG
RIGHTS
RM
RATIFICATION
RREL
RBI
RICE
ROOD
REL
RODHAM
RGY
RUEHZO
RELIGIOUS
RELFREE
RUEUN
RELAM
RSP
RF
REO
REGIONAL
RUPREL
RI
REMON
RPEL
RSO
SCUL
SENV
SOCI
SZ
SNAR
SO
SP
SU
SY
SI
SMIG
SYR
SA
SW
SF
SR
SYRIA
SNARM
START
SPECIALIST
SG
SNIG
SCI
SGWI
SE
SIPDIS
SANC
SELAB
SN
SETTLEMENTS
SCIENCE
SENVENV
SENS
SPCE
SPAS
SECURITY
SENC
SOCIETY
SOSI
SENVEAGREAIDTBIOECONSOCIXR
SEN
SPECI
ST
SL
SENVCASCEAIDID
SC
SECRETARY
STR
SNA
SOCIS
SADC
SEP
SK
SHUM
SYAI
SMIL
STEPHEN
SNRV
SKCA
SENSITIVE
SECI
SCUD
SCRM
SGNV
SECTOR
SAARC
SENVSXE
SWMN
STEINBERG
SOPN
SOCR
SCRS
SWE
SARS
SNARIZ
SUDAN
SENVQGR
SAN
SM
SFNV
SSA
SPCVIS
SOFA
SCULKPAOECONTU
SENVKGHG
SHI
SEVN
SH
SNARCS
SNARN
SIPRS
TBIO
TW
TRGY
TSPA
TU
TPHY
TI
TX
TH
TIP
TSPL
TNGD
TZ
TS
TC
TK
TURKEY
TERRORISM
TPSL
TINT
TRSY
TERFIN
TPP
TT
TECHNOLOGY
TE
TAGS
TRAFFICKING
TJ
TN
TO
TD
TP
TREATY
TR
TA
TIO
TECH
TF
TRAD
TNDG
TWI
TPSA
TWL
TAUSCHER
TRBY
TL
TV
THPY
TSPAM
TREL
TRT
TNAR
TFIN
TWCH
THOMMA
THOMAS
TERROR
TRY
TBID
UK
UNESCO
UNSC
UNGA
UN
US
UZ
USEU
UG
UP
UNAUS
UNMIK
USTR
UY
USUN
UNEP
UNDC
UV
UNPUOS
UNSCR
USAID
UNODC
UNRCR
UNHCR
UNDP
UNCRIME
UA
UNHRC
UNRWA
UNO
UNCND
UNCHR
USAU
UNICEF
USPS
UNOMIG
UNESCOSCULPRELPHUMKPALCUIRXFVEKV
UR
UNFICYP
UNCITRAL
UNAMA
UNVIE
USTDA
USNC
UNCSD
USCC
UNEF
UNGAPL
USSC
UNMIC
UNTAC
UNCLASSIFIED
USDA
UNCTAD
USGS
UNFPA
UNSE
USOAS
UE
UAE
UNCHS
UNDESCO
UNC
UNSCS
UKXG
UNGACG
UNHR
UNBRO
UNCHC
UNFCYP
UNIDROIT
WHTI
WIPO
WTRO
WHO
WTO
WMO
WFP
WEET
WS
WE
WA
WHA
WBG
WILLIAM
WI
WSIS
WCL
WEBZ
WZ
WW
WWBG
WMD
WWT
WMN
WWARD
WITH
WTRQ
WCO
WEU
WB
WBEG
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09STATE116396, NON-PAPER FOR RUSSIA ON U.S.-RUSSIA SPACE
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09STATE116396.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09STATE116396 | 2009-11-12 01:24 | 2011-08-24 01:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Secretary of State |
VZCZCXRO5460
OO RUEHIK
DE RUEHC #6396/01 3160131
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O P 120124Z NOV 09
FM SECSTATE WASHDC
TO RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW IMMEDIATE 5267
INFO RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA PRIORITY 0169
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK PRIORITY 8614
RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS PRIORITY
RUEHUNV/USMISSION UNVIE VIENNA PRIORITY 5757
DISARMAMENT CONFERENCE COLLECTIVE
NATO EU COLLECTIVE
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 1412
RUEHRL/AMEMBASSY BERLIN 4599
RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA 5730
RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON 7709
RUEHOT/AMEMBASSY OTTAWA 0287
RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS 7144
RUEHRO/AMEMBASSY ROME 2989
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO 1210
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 07 STATE 116396
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
GENENVA FOR CD DEL
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: CDG MCAP NASA PARM PREL RS TSPA UNPUOS
SUBJECT: NON-PAPER FOR RUSSIA ON U.S.-RUSSIA SPACE
SECURITY DIALOGUE
REF: A. A) STATE 54933
¶B. B) MOSCOW 1474
¶C. C) 05 STATE 89792
¶D. D) 07 MOSCOW 1002
¶E. E) UNVIEVIENNA324
¶F. F) STATE 58525
STATE 00116396 001.2 OF 007
¶1. (U) THIS IS AN ACTION REQUEST. See paragraph 7 below.
¶2. (SBU) SUMMARY: A U.S. non-paper dated May 28, 2009, was
transmitted to Russia's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, inviting
Russia to discuss the February 10, 2009, Iridium-Cosmos
collision, and expressing the United States' interest in
resuming the pursuit of bilateral talks on transparency and
confidence-building measures (TCBMs) with Russia. In an
aide-memoire from Russia dated September 29, 2009, Russia
responded positively to the U.S. non-paper, and expressed its
desire to resume dialogues between Russian and U.S. experts
on space-related issues. Russia subsequently proposed a
meeting on November 14, 2009, in Geneva. Washington would
like to counter-propose to conduct two half-day meetings on
January 20-21, 2010, in Paris. This would allow both the
U.S. and Russia sufficient time for preparations. Washington
would also like to propose the addition of several items to
the proposed agenda, as well as to request responses in
advance of the meeting to the questions posed by the USG
during the June 8, 2009, meeting on the margins of the UN
Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space. END SUMMARY.
¶3. (SBU) BACKGROUND: On June 2, 2009, the Russian MFA
Department for Security and Disarmament (DVBR) responded
positively to the U.S. non-paper dated May 28, 2009, which
invited Russia to discuss the February 10, 2009, collision of
an Iridium communications satellite and an inoperable Russian
military spacecraft (Ref A). The U.S. non-paper also noted
interest in resuming the pursuit of bilateral U.S.-Russia
pragmatic and voluntary transparency and confidence-building
measures (TCBMs) (Ref B). Previous U.S.-Russian dialogues on
space security issues were held in Washington, D.C., in April
2005 and in Paris in January 2007 (Refs C and D).
¶4. (SBU) During a June 8 meeting in Vienna on the margins of
the annual meeting of the UN Committee on the Peaceful Uses
of Outer Space (COPUOS), Brigadier General Susan Helms,
Director of Plans and Policy, J-5, United States Strategic
Command, briefed the Russian COPUOS delegation on the
collision and led a discussion on the opportunity for
bilateral cooperation between the United States and Russia on
space TCBMs (Ref E). At that time, the U.S. handed over a
list of questions for consideration by the Russian Federation
(found in paragraph 7 of Ref F). At the end of this meeting,
Russia suggested the need for a specialized experts meeting
on the topic.
¶5. (SBU) The U.S. received an aide-memoire from Russia dated
September 29, 2009, expressing its desire to resume the
dialogue between Russian and U.S. experts on space-related
issues (paragraph 11). This aide-memoire also proposed
several agenda items for the dialogue. Since receiving this
aide-memoire, a Russian embassy official relayed Moscow's
proposal that a dialogue take place on November 14, 2009, in
Geneva, Switzerland.
¶6. (SBU) The U.S. non-paper (paragraph 8) provides a
counter-proposal to their November 14 date and venue that
will allow the USG sufficient time for preparations. It is
important that this dialogue take place before the Scientific
and Technical Subcommittee meeting of the Committee on the
Peaceful Uses of Outer Space, scheduled during February 8-19,
2010, so that the U.S. and Russia have the opportunity to
coordinate positions prior to the discussion of the COPUOS
agenda item on the "Long Term Sustainability of Outer Space
STATE 00116396 002.2 OF 007
Activities." The U.S. interagency delegation for the space
security dialogue will include representatives from NASA, the
Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Chiefs of
Staff, United States Strategic Command, and the Department of
State. END BACKGROUND.
¶7. (SBU) ACTION REQUEST: Embassy is requested to pass the
U.S. non-paper (contained in paragraph 8 below) and draft
agenda (contained in paragraph 9) to appropriate host
government officials at the MFA and to provide copies to the
Ministry of Defense and the Russian Space Agency (Roskosmos).
Embassy may draw upon and handover the contingency talking
points in paragraph 10 and is asked to report its delivery
and any GoR reaction at the time of delivery. END ACTION
REQUEST.
¶8. (SBU) BEGIN TEXT OF U.S. NON-PAPER:
Non-Paper
November 11, 2009
The United States is pleased to respond to the Russian
Federation's Aide-Memoire of September 29, 2009, proposing a
meeting between U.S. and Russian experts on space-related
issues, and Moscow's subsequent proposal for a November 14
meeting in Geneva relayed by the Russian Federation's Embassy
in Washington, D.C.
The United States is pleased that the Russian Federation has
expressed a willingness to resume this important dialogue.
As Russia's Aide-Memoire notes, it - and for that matter, the
United States - will require adequate time for careful
preparation and to ensure participation by appropriate
experts. Therefore, the United States would counter-propose
to hold two half-day meetings on January 20-21, 2010, in
Paris, France. We propose that the United States host the
first half-day of discussions on January 20 at the U.S.
Embassy, and that Russia host the second half-day on January
21 at its Embassy.
The United States has reviewed Russia's proposed agenda items
and generally agrees with its proposals, but with the
addition of three new agenda items. First, the United States
believes it is important for each of us to exchange
perspectives regarding the challenges to our shared national
security interests in a congested, complex, and potentially
contested space domain. Second, the United States proposes
an agenda item to explore the continuity of our respective
positions on the "long term sustainability of outer space
activities," to be discussed at the Scientific and Technical
Subcommittee of the UN Committee on the Peaceful Uses of
Outer Space in February 2010. Third, the United States
proposes an agenda item to discuss opportunities for expanded
U.S.-Russian space cooperation related to problems regarding
cross-cutting/multi-agency issues such as additional measures
to enhance spaceflight safety.
To ensure the most complete review of the agenda, the United
States believes this meeting should include appropriate
interagency government experts, including experts from our
respective military space forces as well as from civilian
space agencies.
In order to facilitate our space security dialogue, the
United States would appreciate receiving in advance of the
meeting Russia's answers to our questions (attached at Annex
B to the U.S.-proposed agenda) posed on June 8, 2009, during
our bilateral discussions in Vienna on the margins of the UN
Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (COPUOS), in
which Brigadier General Susan Helms, Director of Plans and
Policy, J-5, United States Strategic Command, briefed the
Russian COPUOS delegation on the Iridium-Cosmos collision and
led a discussion on the opportunity for bilateral cooperation
between the United States and Russia on space transparency
and confidence-building measures.
As we prepare for this prospective meeting, the United States
STATE 00116396 003.2 OF 007
believes it would be useful for us to take without delay two
pragmatic steps to enhance spaceflight safety.
The first step is the identification of specific points of
contact for transmitting and receiving timely exchanges of
satellite collision hazard warnings through the direct
communication between our two governments. When a country's
satellite and a space object (e.g., debris) are projected to
pass each other within a distance of one kilometer or less in
low earth orbit or five kilometers or less in geostationary
orbit, the U.S. Government attempts to so notify either the
governmental or commercial satellite operator(s) to ensure
flight safety. As the time of the closest conjunction nears,
more analysis is accomplished to see if the distance of
closest approach has changed due to orbital dynamics effects,
for example, gravitational forces. The U.S. Government will
provide updates as they become available.
In this regard, the United States wishes to inform Russia
that the U.S. Government Point of Contact for exchanges of
collision hazard warnings is the Mission Commander of the
U.S. Strategic Command's Joint Space Operations Center
(JSpOC) at Vandenberg Air Force Base, California. The JSpOC
Mission Commander can be contacted at:
Telefax: 1 (805) 605-3507
Email: JSpOCSSAConjunctionAssessment@vandenberg.af.m il
Telephone: 1 (805) 605-3514
The United States requests similar contact information for
the Russian government's Point of Contact.
As a second pragmatic step, the United States proposes that
familiarization visits by U.S. and Russian military space
operators should proceed as soon as possible in accordance
with the strategic framework for military-to-military
engagement established between the Chairman of the U.S. Joint
Chiefs of Staff and the Chief of the General Staff of the
Russian Armed Forces on July 6, 2009. The United States
believes that the highest priority should be given to
scheduling reciprocal visits by satellite movement control
specialists. The U.S. point of contact for these visits is:
USSTRATCOM/J5, Plans and Policy
Telephone: 1 (402) 232-6603
Telefax: 1 (402) 294-1035
The United States looks forward to receiving Moscow's
response to our proposed dates and venue for resuming this
timely dialogue and welcomes Russia's thoughts on the
U.S.-proposed agenda.
END TEXT OF NON-PAPER.
¶9. (SBU) BEGIN TEXT OF THE U.S.-PROPOSED AGENDA:
PROPOSED AGENDA FOR U.S.-RUSSIA SPACE SECURITY DIALOGUE
DAY ONE (U.S. Host):
¶1. Introductions
¶2. U.S. and Russian perspectives on challenges - including
threats - to shared national security interests in outer space
¶3. Russian and U.S. views regarding the use of outer space
in support of national security interests
¶4. Approaches to ensuring the safety of outer space
activities
a. Russia's responses to U.S. questions provided on June 8,
2009 (Annex A)
b. U.S. and Russian perspectives on the "long term
sustainability of outer space activities," an agenda item of
the Scientific and Technical Subcommittee of the UN Committee
STATE 00116396 004.2 OF 007
on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space
¶5. Opportunities for expanded U.S.-Russian space cooperation
related to problems regarding cross-cutting/multi-agency
issues
a. U.S. and Russian views on additional measures to enhance
spaceflight safety
b. Other matters
DAY TWO (Russia Host):
¶6. Russia's proposals for transparency and
confidence-building measures (TCBMs) in outer space (Annex B)
a. Russian proposals
b. U.S. perspectives
c. Options for implementation of mutually-agreed TCBMs on a
bilateral basis
¶7. Discussions on outer space TCBM matters in the UN General
Assembly's First Committee
a. Review of past attempts to co-sponsor a TCBM Resolution in
the 62nd and 63rd sessions of the General Assembly
b. The opportunity for U.S.-Russian collaboration at the 65th
session of the General Assembly
¶8. Russian and U.S. perspectives regarding the European
Union's draft "Code of Conduct for Outer Space Activities"
Annex A: Questions provided to the Russian Federation by the
United States on June 8, 2009
a. What space surveillance and space situational awareness
capabilities does Russia currently operate/utilize?
b. What are Russia's future plans for its space situational
awareness capabilities?
c. Your March 5, 2009, non-paper mentioned the importance of
transparency and confidence-building measures in space
activities, such as the sharing of data related to orbital
parameters of space vehicles. To promote spaceflight safety,
the U.S. already shares orbital parameters freely on the
space-track.org website to 37,000 registered users from 110
nations.
i. Does Russia intend to share data in a similar manner or
only bilaterally?
ii. Does Russia intend to share information on all satellites
or only collision debris data?
iii. What data would Russia be willing to share (two-line
element sets, maneuver plans, debris field data, pre-launch
parameters, etc.)?
d. Your non-paper also stated that Russia would like
"consultations regarding ambiguous situations of concern for
spacefaring nations."
i. What types of concerns would be considered in this
category? Would these situations include emergency
notification of a potential conjunction, loss of control of a
satellite that is drifting, or orbital debris information?
ii. How would Russia like to bring such ambiguous situations
to the attention of spacefaring nations? Through what
channels (e.g., UN, diplomatic, military-to-military
channels)?
e. The U.S. intends to monitor and assess potential
collisions for all 800 maneuverable satellites against all
other satellites, looking for possible conjunctions. Would
Russia like to be notified of any possible conjunctions with
your satellites that we predict? Through what channels
(e.g., UN, diplomatic, military-to-military channels)?
f. Since all spacefaring nations are concerned with
preventing more collisions in space, do you agree that we
should focus most closely on this topic area at the Committee
on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space? Do you also agree that
other multilateral fora (e.g., Conference on Disarmament, UN
General Assembly First Committee) are the most appropriate
STATE 00116396 005.2 OF 007
venues for substantive discussions on other transparency and
confidence-building measures that could help ensure
predictability, enhance stability, and reduce the likelihood
of misunderstanding in the conduct of space activities?
g. The U.S. and Russia are the most capable nations at
tracking space objects and are in the best position to
predict conjunctions that could have significant impact on
all users of space. What is Russia doing to predict possible
conjunctions? Does it intend to notify owner/operators of
possible conjunctions?
h. Is Russia willing to engage in bilateral discussions,
military-to-military technical information exchanges, and/or
visits regarding space data sharing?
Annex B: Russia's proposals for Transparency and Confidence
Building Measures for Outer Space Activities - as noted in
Paragraph 10 of Russia's July 13, 2009, submission to the UN
Secretary General. (UN General Assembly document
A/64/138/Add.1 of September 19, 2009)
(a) Exchange of information on:
(i) The main directions of States' outer space policy;
(ii) Major outer space research and use programs;
(iii) Orbital parameters of outer space objects;
(iv) Foreseeable dangerous situations in space;
(b) Familiarization visits:
(i) Expert visits, including visits to space launch sites,
flight command and control centers and other facilities of
outer space infrastructure;
(ii) Invitation of observers to launches of spacecraft;
(iii) Demonstrations of rocket and space technologies;
(c) Notification of:
(i) Planned spacecraft launches;
(ii) Scheduled spacecraft maneuvers which could result in
dangerous proximity to spacecraft of other States;
(iii) The beginning of descent from orbit of unguided space
objects and the predicted impact areas on Earth;
(iv) The return from orbit into the atmosphere of a guided
spacecraft;
(v) The return of a spacecraft with a nuclear source of
power on board, in the case of malfunction and danger of
radioactive materials descending to Earth;
(d) Consultations:
(i) To clarify the information provided on outer space
research and use programs;
(ii) On ambiguous situations, as well as on other issues of
concern;
(iii) To discuss the implementation of agreed transparency
and confidence building measures in outer space activities;
(e) Thematic workshops on various outer space research and
use issues, organized on a bilateral or multilateral basis,
with the participation of scientists, diplomats, military and
technical experts.
END TEXT OF PROPOSED AGENDA.
¶10. (SBU) BEGIN CONTINGENCY TALKING POINTS:
-- The U.S. regrets that it is unable to accept Russia's
proposal for a meeting on November 14, 2009, in Geneva. A
meeting in late January would allow for better preparation
and ensure the participation of appropriate U.S. experts.
-- In addition, a meeting late January would enable our
delegations to explore the continuity of our respective
positions on the "long term sustainability of outer space
activities," prior to the Scientific and Technical
Subcommittee meeting of the UN Committee on the Peaceful Uses
of Outer Space, which convenes on February 9, 2010.
-- U.S. participants in the proposed meeting would include
STATE 00116396 006.2 OF 007
experts from the U.S. Department of State (including the
Bureau of International Security and Nonproliferation and the
Bureau of Oceans, Environment, and Science), the U.S.
Department of Defense, Joint Chiefs of Staff, United States
Strategic Command, and the National Aeronautics and Space
Administration.
-- The U.S. delegation would be headed by Mr. Frank Rose, the
Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Defense Policy and
Verification Operations.
END CONTINGENCY TALKING POINTS.
¶11. (SBU) BEGIN RUSSIAN AIDE-MEMOIRE:
AIDE-MEMOIRE
Moscow
September 29, 2009
The Russian side has carefully studied the ideas and
proposals contained in the U.S. Aide-Memoire of May 28, 2009
(received from the U.S. Embassy in Moscow on June 2, 2009),
as well as those set forth at the meeting of Russian and U.S.
experts in Vienna on June 8, 2009.
We agree with the U.S. side that the intensive development of
outer space activities is outstripping the development of the
infrastructure for monitoring near-Earth orbits. As a result,
the technical resources that countries have at their disposal
do not allow them to continuously follow all launched
spacecraft and to predict the occurrence of hazardous
situations in outer space, including potential collisions of
satellites with fragments of space junk or with each other.
Such situations are particularly dangerous for manned space
flights, especially for the International Space Station. The
collision that occurred between Russian and U.S. satellites
on February 10, 2009, is a serious warning of the possibility
that such incidents could happen in the future. We agree that
lessons must be learned from this, and we reaffirm our
willingness to resume the dialogue between Russian and U.S.
experts on space-related issues.
Apart from the issues set forth in the U.S. Aide-Memoire of
May 28, 2009, we would consider it useful to discuss the
following subjects at the meeting of experts;
¶1. The two sides' views regarding the use of outer space;
¶2. The two sides' conceptual approaches to ensuring the
safety of outer space activities;
¶3. transparency and confidence-building measures (TCBMs) in
outer space;
¶4. Russian proposals for TCBMs presented in the report of the
UN Secretary General (UN General Assembly document A/62/114
of August 3, 2007);
¶5. the new Russian proposal for TCBMs - international
exchange of information on predicted hazardous situations in
outer space; the conditions required for its implementation;
¶6. interaction between Russia and the U.S. on TCBM-related
matters at sessions of the UN General Assembly;
¶7. the possibility and advisability of drafting a UN document
on TCBMs based on our countries' proposals;
¶8. Russian and U.S. approaches to the EU's proposal for
developing a Code of Conduct for Outer Space Activities.
At present we are studying the U.S. side's questions
regarding a possible exchange of information on the situation
in outer space, which were conveyed to us in Vienna during
the fifty-second (2009) session of the UN Committee on the
Peaceful Uses of Outer Space. We have in mind a discussion of
these matters in the course of further contacts.
The Russian side hopes for the U.S. side's constructive
response to these ideas and, as a first step, proposes
setting a tentative timeframe, a possible agenda, and a place
to hold a new meeting of Russian and U.S. experts. We would
like to receive the U.S. side's proposals concerning this
matter, taking into account the time required for careful
preparation of a meeting.
STATE 00116396 007.2 OF 007
END RUSSIAN AIDE-MEMOIRE.
¶12. (U) The Department thanks the Embassy for their
assistance. Please slug responses for ISN/MDSP-RBuenneke,
OES/SAT-DTurner, and EUR/PRA-MHardiman.
CLINTON