Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 51122 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 03ISTANBUL467, ISTANBUL WORRIES ABOUT WAR, U.S.-TURKEY TIES,

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #03ISTANBUL467.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
03ISTANBUL467 2003-04-07 12:59 2011-08-24 01:00 UNCLASSIFIED Consulate Istanbul
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS ISTANBUL 000467 
 
SIPDIS 
 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: PGOV PREL ECON TK
SUBJECT: ISTANBUL WORRIES ABOUT WAR, U.S.-TURKEY TIES, 
ECONOMY 
 
 
1. (U) Summary: With apparently over ninety percent of the 
local population opposed to the war in Iraq, anti-war 
sentiment in Istanbul continues to harden as reports and 
images of civilian casualties stream in over the sympathetic 
news networks.  Among Istanbul's academic and business elite, 
however, fears of a breakdown in U.S.-Turkish relations and 
its consequences for Turkey have replaced Iraq as the primary 
concern.  The only issue that seems to span the sharp divide 
between the concerns of the man in the street and the elite 
is a shared nervousness about the government's ability to 
manage an already-battered economy in the face of additional 
shocks from the war.  End Summary. 
 
 
2. (U) Media coverage of the coalition operations in Iraq has 
largely reinforced the prevailing anti-war sentiment in 
Istanbul.  Local television stations have focused 
predominantly on civilian casualties, reports of coalition 
setbacks, and regional opposition to the war.  Although our 
contacts with average Turks have elicited responses ranging 
from apathy to antipathy, the general mood among 
working-class (and unemployed) Istanbul residents remains 
decidedly anti-war.  Pointing to the coalition's failure to 
find evidence of chemical and biological weapons, almost all 
Turks here question the U.S.'s justification for war. 
Students stubbornly cling to their mantra of "no blood for 
oil," while residents of more conservative and religious 
neighborhoods voice their concerns about an "anti-Muslim 
crusade."  Although very few have a kind word to say about 
Saddam and his regime, they point gloomily to the 
difficulties involved in managing a post-Saddam Iraq and the 
regional resentment that is being provoked by the U.S.'s 
presence. 
 
 
3. (U) The preoccupations of our business, academic and media 
contacts, however, have shifted dramatically in recent days. 
Following weeks of negotiations and the parliament's refusal 
to allow the U.S. to transport troops and equipment to 
northern Iraq, the Istanbul elite is now focused on the 
"crisis" in U.S.-Turkish relations.  Discussions of "what 
went wrong?", "who is to blame?", and "is the strategic 
partnership dead?" have replaced arguments over whether the 
war in Iraq is justified.  At an April 2 Marmara Group 
conference on U.S.-Turkish relations, a panel of retired 
generals, senior diplomats, and business leaders skirted the 
case for war, but came out strongly in favor of maintaining 
the strategic partnership.  Former Foreign Minister Emre 
Gonensay argued that, given its friendship with the U.S., 
Turkey should have stood by the U.S. in Iraq.  Echoing the 
comments of other panelists, retired General Necdet Timur 
remarked that two months of disagreement cannot be allowed to 
undermine a 50-year old strategic relationship. 
 
 
4. (U) The only unifying theme in our discussions throughout 
Istanbul has been the universal, even overriding, concern 
about the fragile economic situation.  "Turkey must solve its 
economic problems... without a healthy economy, foreign 
policy is irrelevant," said former diplomat and DYP Vice 
Chairman Mehmet Ali Bayar at the Marmara Group conference. 
Investment analysts, bankers, and economists are skeptical 
about the AK government's ability to implement the IMF 
program.  Many of them now argue that the risk of loan 
default or restructuring has risen.  Sentiment has improved 
in the wake of Secretary Powell's visit and the renewed 
prospect for U.S. assistance, but all eyes are on AK's 
economic efforts.  Almost everyone worries about the 
potentially damaging impact that the war in Iraq is likely to 
have on Turkey's economy.  Local merchants and restaurant 
owners claim they are already feeling the pinch of 
contracting tourism.  Grocers, taxi drivers, security guards, 
and other working-class Turks in Istanbul bemoan their 
economic plight and hope for a rapid conclusion to the war. 
ARNETT