| "A Step Too Far" On the road to global disarmament Part One Copyright Joe Vialls, 7 May 2002 |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
| Hamilton, Dunblane |
|
During the morning of 26 April 2002 an alert went out to all police in
Erfurt, Germany, that shots had been fired inside the local Gutenburg
Gymnasium high school. Aware of the danger, the first pair of police
officers attending wore bulletproof vests and approached the school with
caution. As 42 year-old police officer Andreas Gorski alighted from
the car and turned carefully to face the school building more than 100
feet away, a single shot rang out from inside. Officer Andreas Gorski,
shot once very accurately through the head, died
instantly. Though Gorski’s partner did not have time to identify or even see the mystery shooter fire from inside the school, the prestigious “Time” magazine mistakenly believes he did. On page twenty-eight of its European edition dated May 6, 2002, the magazine claims, “At 11:12 a.m., the first police car arrived at the school. As the policemen, wearing bulletproof vests, approached, Steinhäuser leaned out of the window and shot one policeman in the head.” By ruthlessly using one of the oldest techniques in the media arsenal, preferred media and political patsy Robert Steinhäuser, 19 year-old school student and member of a local IPSC gun club, was neatly slipped into the frame without a trace of supporting evidence. Because the media version of events is blatantly wrong, and because the sudden death of Officer Gorski understandably slowed the police response to the emergency considerably, we’d better return to the scene of this particular crime and evaluate what really happened. The official police records show all victims inside the school building were killed by a Glock Model 17 semi-automatic pistol, one of the most reliable defensive handguns in the world, and a favorite with IPSC pistol club members. The Glock 17 has a 4.5’ barrel and holds a maximum of seventeen 9x19-mm rounds in its magazine. Normally, club rounds are loaded to fire a 125-grain bullet, which exits the muzzle of the barrel at about 1050 feet per second. Although very effective for close range defense when fired in the standard IPSC “double tap” way [two rapid shots per static target at about seventy-five feet range], the Glock 17 is a most unlikely weapon for the amazing single-shot kill of Police Officer Andreas Gorski, a known moving target positioned more than 100 feet away from the Gutenburg school building. If 19 year-old Robert Steinhäuser had been involved at all, he would certainly have followed his rigid German IPSC club training and fired two rapid shots at Officer Gorski’s body cavity, i.e. the standard heart and lung target area, rather than try for an “Annie Oakley” single shot to the head, a much smaller dynamic target. Certain organizations are trained specifically to aim directly at the head in order to avoid body armor and ensure a clean kill, but this requires enormous skill and is normally restricted to specialist anti-terrorist groups, for example German GSG9 and the Israeli Mistaravim. |
 |
| Bryant, Port Arthur |
| Steinhauser, Erfurt |
|
Think about it people, think about it! If “superhuman” Robert Steinhäuser
was waiting patiently at the front of the school to shoot the first
policeman to arrive at the crime scene, then who was running around the
rest of the large school building terrorizing the students at the same
time? For large numbers of named students this is not a mystery at all. As
will be explained in detail later in this three-part extended report,
these credible young adults claim two shooters were seen entering the rear
entrance of the school, one of whom later escaped under the cover of
students and teachers evacuating the building. Most importantly perhaps,
no student at the school positively identified Robert Steinhäuser as one
of these two shooters.
Despite the fact that both shooters went about their grisly business in absolute silence wearing full face masks, a 60 year-old history teacher by the name of Heise claimed to have recognized Robert Steinhäuser, convinced him to stop the killing and then locked him in a classroom. As you may expect the media had a field day with “witness” Herr Heise, claiming, “Confronted in a hallway by history teacher Rainer Heise, Steinhäuser took off his mask and said, ‘That's enough for today.’ Heise shoved him into a classroom, where he took his own life.” Despite the fact that police have already quietly debunked Heise’s ridiculous claims, political identities seem determined to perpetuate the Steinhäuser myth by awarding Heise the German equivalent of the Victoria Cross, for “courage above and beyond the call of duty”. Erfurt is the third pre-planned mass murder since 1996 that can be linked together with precision in terms of modus operandi and underlying motive. The first mass murder took place at Dunblane in Scotland during March 1996, where an unknown shooter killed 17 and injured 13 at the local school. This shocking crime resulted in the “activation” of Draconian gun control laws already prepared at the Westminster Parliament. Next was Port Arthur, Australia, in late April 1996, when an unknown shooter killed 35 and injured 22. Once again Draconian gun control laws already waiting in Canberra were promptly activated, using Port Arthur to effectively stifle dissent. In Germany, already-prepared Draconian gun laws were actually debated within a few hours of the Erfurt massacre where 17 were killed and 7 injured, and German Chancellor Gerhard Schröder recently stated he intends to ram these new laws through the German Federal Parliament in Berlin during the next two weeks. Though it is difficult for most people to comprehend mass murders being deliberately planned and executed in order to drive a geopolitical initiative, nowadays it is far more difficult to ignore the comprehensive evidence that proves this claim to be true. Those few people who are fully aware of the nature of some of these events, invariably point the finger firmly at the United Nations as the perpetrator. This from American Congressman Ron Paul, M.D:. “The simple truth is that the UN is not concerned with our Constitution or our system of government. It is concerned only with expanding its power. It's hardly surprising that global government planners seek to impose global gun control, because disarmed nations will be that much easier to rule. Remember, the UN has much more power today than anyone could have imagined 50 years ago. “So while it may seem far-fetched today that the UN could force every U.S. citizens to turn over their arms, the current gun control conference [July 2001] could be planting the seed for such tyranny in decades to come. UN supporters like to ridicule the notion that the UN represents the beginning of one-world government, but what other label can be applied to an organization that seeks global laws, global courts, centralized legislative power, and a worldwide army?” Though much of what he writes is true, Congressman Paul has apparently missed the obvious: The United Nations is a toothless tiger, basically a talkfest for megalomaniac global lobbyists who can actually achieve nothing at all without funding from an external source. Thus whoever controls the flow of funds controls the lobbyists, and in turn directly controls the United Nations. At the end of this extended report I will lead you the reader by the hand to a specific street corner in a specific city. As you stand there looking around with interest, you will be less than one hundred yards away from the office of those who deliberately planned and funded the mass murders at Dunblane, Port Arthur and Erfurt for the “greater good”. Whether or not you as an individual then try to locate the actual office is a matter of personal choice, but be warned that, if you do, the result will be far more harmful to your health than smoking a cigarette. Though most normal people would justifiably regard these organizers as criminally insane, history is unfortunately on their side when it comes to proving that reducing or banning gun ownership in the civilian population greatly aids those in authority. Once a civilian population has been comprehensively disarmed, the “authorities” are free to impose whatever punishment they choose to inflict, including death, without fear of retribution. The most recent example is the vicious mob of [heavily armed] Jews slaughtering hundreds of unarmed Moslems in Jenin Refugee Camp and elsewhere, but historically there are many more, as shown in this succinct report by an unknown author, printed by the Sierra Times: “Consider the history of gun control: 1) In 1929 the Soviet Union established gun control. From 1929 to 1953, approximately 20 million dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated. 2) In 1911, Turkey established gun control. From 1915-1917,1.5 million Armenians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated. 3) Germany established gun control in 1938 and from 1939 to 1945, 13 million Jews, gypsies, homosexuals, the mentally ill, and others, who were unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated. 4) China established gun control in 1935. From 1948 to 1952, 20 million political dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated. “Guatemala (5) established gun control in 1964. From 1964 to 1981, 100,000 Mayan Indians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated. 6) Uganda established gun control in 1970. From 1971 to 1979, 300,000 Christians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated. 7) Cambodia established gun control in 1956. From 1975 to 1977, one million "educated" people, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated. This places the total victims who lost their lives because of gun control at approximately 56 million in the last century.” Before going on in parts two and three of this report in order to conduct detailed comparisons between Dunblane, Port Arthur and Erfurt, it seems prudent to provide an example here of the methods used to isolate these three mass murders from other seemingly similar events at Columbine High School in Colorado, and elsewhere. Though Columbine in particular represents a tragic loss of life, it has few if any direct parallels with the three premeditated mass murders in Scotland, Australia and Germany. One of the most important pointers in events such as these is the accuracy of the shooter or shooters, which by direct comparison with premeditated mass murders is normally very poor in “random” events induced by drugs or other causes. Within the overall term “accuracy” lies the killed-to-injured ratio [KTIR], used to determine how many targets are killed relative to those injured. Generally speaking, a victim is normally only killed outright if he or she is hit in the head, a six by six-inch target; or in the heart, a ten by ten-inch target. Together these areas form between one fifth and one seventh of the overall available body target area, so for every person killed, a military ballistics analyst would expect to find another five to seven injured victims, expressed as "1 to 5" and "1 to 7". When a “random” shooting takes place this ratio becomes self-evident, as in the case of the Thurston School Café shooting in Springfield, USA, during 1998. Kip Kinkel, whose parents allegedly said, “they were coping with his bouts of anger by giving him Prozac", opened fire on his fellow students with a semi-automatic weapon. Kinkel fired a total of 51 rounds that day, killing two and injuring twenty, resulting in a normal predictable killed-to-injured ratio of 1 to 10. It is important to note here that just like “chosen” media and political patsy Robert Steinhäuser at Erfurt, Kip Kinkel was also an experienced range shooter. There is no significant difference between these two students in terms of age and shooting experience, and by now most readers will hopefully have realized that Robert Steinhäuser could not, under any circumstances, have been responsible for the thoroughly professional carnage at Gutenburg Gymnasium school. Outside of highly trained anti-terrorist professionals, there are very few if any shooters who could have produced the devastating figures at Dunblane, Port Arthur and Erfurt. At Dunblane the shooter killed 17 and injured 13, scoring an inverted killed-to-injured ratio of 1.30 to 1. At Port Arthur the shooter killed 35 and injured 22, scoring an inverted killed-to-injured ratio of 1.59 to 1. At Erfurt the shooter killed 17 and injured 7, scoring an inverted killed-to-injured ratio of 2.43 to 1. In the view of this author the same team of mercenaries was used for all three mass murders, primarily for reasons of security, and will continue to be used in the future. Unfortunately for all of us, their killed-to-injured ratios are steadily improving with each mass murder they execute. Do not allow yourself to be distracted by the overall number of dead, but focus instead on the killed-to-injured ratios. Dunblane was very professional at 1.30 to 1, but the team then improved its performance at Port Arthur with 1.59 to 1. At Erfurt the team really aimed for the stars, and produced a staggering further increased killed-to-injured ratio of 2.43 to 1. God help the next country on the Globalist list. Coming soon: Part Two – Dunblane and Port Arthur Port Arthur American Flight 77 Electronic Hijack Vialls Home Services |
 |
| Glock Model 17, 9x19-mm |
