Steve Seymour Software
Design

Shock Jewish
Double-Standard on Prince Harry

In 1290 AD, King
Edward the First made a royal decision in parliament to banish all Jews from
England. This statute was never repealed, meaning that all Jews in England today
[though not necessarily  in Scotland or Wales], are illegal immigrants
subject to immediate deportation.

Copyright Joe
Vialls, 17 January 2005

Jewish Lobbies Try New 'Internet Suppression' Angle:  See
red update

On the left is Jewish Nazi
General Helmut Wilberg of the Luftwaffe. Hitler awarded him the Hohenzollern's
Knight's Cross with Swords, EKI, and EKII. On the right is Jewish Nazi Colonel
Walter H. Hollaender of the Wehrmacht, whom Hitler decorated with the
Ritterkreuz, German-Cross in Gold, EKI, EKII, and Close Combat Badge. Some if
not all of these honors were bestowed in recognition of these senior officers'
considerable skills in killing thousands of Englishmen, Americans, Russians and
others. In the center is Prince Harry, vilified and demonized by the largely
Jewish-controlled western media for wearing a hired nazi uniform to a private
party!

Related Links

Princess Diana
Murder
WPC Yvonne
Fletcher
Pan Am
103
Vialls Home

I do not
normally comment on actions by religious groups or cults of any persuasion, but
the recent massive worldwide Jewish attack on 20 year-old Prince Harry, son of
Prince Charles and third in line for the British throne, cannot be allowed to go
unchallenged and unanswered. Believe me, if this obscene attack had been
orchestrated by Christians, Hindus, Muslims or Buddhists I would be equally
scathing, but it was not.

The
British are a stoic people, who quietly accept that every family in England,
Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland has lost one or more relatives on the
fields of battle with  Germany, plus an additional two relatives from each
family left horribly maimed or scarred. On top of that are the civilian dead,
with countless Britons killed and injured by German bombers dropping high
explosives on their homes, night after night for years on end.

Despite
this terrible suffering, nowadays you will see or hear very little about the
pain of sixty years ago. If you look very closely, you will find a number of
discreet war memorials scattered around in the towns and villages of the United
Kingdom, but that is all. Within five years of the end of WWII, most of Britain
had been repaired, with seemingly endless widows and orphans quietly getting on
with their lives as best they could in a dignified manner.

It was
and still is much the same story in Europe, across the Commonwealth, and in
America. A staggering 57 million people were killed in World War II, with
another 100+ million suffering 'severe' disabilities, meaning the loss of one of
more limbs, or one or more eyes. To my certain knowledge, only one tiny and
insignificant religious group has ever sought to exploit this terrible suffering
for personal financial and geopolitical gain, which brings us back to the very
unfortunate Prince Harry.

In
brief, Prince Harry wore a hired WWII German Army Afrika Corps uniform complete
with a swastika to a private fancy dress party. You think this is a big deal?
Not at all, because over the last thirty years I have watched successive Jewish
stage and film producers use identical uniforms and swastikas in multiple
attempts to denigrate the German people in general, and so-called German 'Nazis'
(National Socialists) in particular.

This
deliberate western media demonization of the German people has been so
successful, that nowadays in Germany itself it is impossible to deny 'The Jewish
Holocaust' without being automatically thrown in prison for two years [no
appeals considered] , and the swastika has been outlawed, despite its humble
ancient origin representing the revolving sun, fire, or life.

The
swastika was widely used in ancient Mesopotamian coinage as well as appearing in
early Christian and Byzantium art, where it was known as the Gammadion Cross. It
also appeared in South and Central America, widely used in Mayan art during the
same time period. Certainly the swastika was adopted by Adolf Hitler for his
flag, in the same way that Japan adopted the rising sun, but so what? Cynical
readers should note that in 2005 the sun is still allowed to rise, even in
Tokyo.

While Jewish stage and film
producers continually and noisily use Nazi uniforms to intimidate and demean the
German people, in order to screw them for more and more 'war reparations',
Prince Harry quietly continues his training to help defend Great Britain from
external attack.

"If
you prick us, do we not bleed? if you tickle us, do we not laugh? if you poison
us, do we not  die? and if you wrong us, shall we not revenge?"

William Shakespeare, "The
Merchant of Venice"

Michael Howard QC is Leader
of the British Conservative Party Opposition  in the British Parliament,
and "the most senior Jew in Britain".  Howard acted like a striking cobra
as soon as the photograph of Prince Harry was made public, stating arrogantly,
"A written apology is not enough. I think a lot of people will be offended. In
fact a public apology [on television] would be appropriate." Small wonder that
the British Conservative Party doesn't have a hope of gaining government while
this outspoken lobbyist is allowed to remain in charge.

It is a
documented historical fact that over many centuries, Jewish moneylenders managed
to control the British and other thrones by stealth, using an international
network staffed by financial experts who manipulated various kings and queens
into fighting wars best suited to Jewish international interests.  In
Britain this was brought to an abrupt end by Edward I (nicknamed "Longshanks" by
his affectionate subjects), who was outraged that a bunch of moneylenders would
dare to tell him what to do. Was he, Edward, not the lawful King of England?

After
spending a remarkably short time mulling over the problem, Longshanks issued a
decree in parliament, which reads in part "...and so herupon are  the Jews
banished out of all the King's Dominions: and never since can they obtain any
priviledge to return hither again." in addition, Edwark I ordered that all Jews
must wear a yellow patch in the shape of a star attached to their outer clothing
to identify them in public.

Shortly
afterwards the heads of all Jewish households were arrested. Approximately 300
were taken to the Tower of London and executed for treason, while others were
executed in their homes for the same crime. In direct contrast to modern day
Jewish homicidal maniacs like Paul Wolfowitz, Edward I spared the women and
children, eventually banishing all remaining Jews of both sexes from England in
1290 AD.

The
moneylenders were not to be denied however, and more than 350 years later in the
mid-17th Century, the Jews implored Oliver Cromwell (the first 'Representative
Democrat') to repeal the statute in exchange for a very large sum of cash.
Cromwell wanted to accede because he desperately needed the money, but scathing
public opinion prevented him from doing so. In the end, Cromwell compromised
himself and his country by abstaining from formal revocation of the banishment;
instead allowing Jews to enter the country on the sly, in flagrant defiance of
English law.

In many
ways, Oliver Cromwell perfected the template for all corrupt politicians who
would follow him in so-called 'democracies' across the western hemisphere: First
he broke English law, then he lied to the English people, before finally
accepting unconditional loans [bribes] from international bodies intent on
undermining English national security by stealth. But since the 17th Century, no
politician has dared to repeal Edward the First's popular statute, which is
still on the books today, in turn leading to Jewish moneylender determination to
bring down the English [now British] monarchy at any cost, and by any means
possible.

The reasoning
behind this is very simple. Remove the British Monarchy, and the loyal Brigade
of Guards which protects its members, and a corrupt British politician would
repeal Edward's statute in a flash, thereby giving the international
moneylenders de-facto control of the United Kingdom.

It is
for this reason that successive Jewish politicians in the British Parliament
have tried to force the military to abolish regimental names, identities, and
thus traditions, in favor of a faceless "Unified Force". An amalgamated force
such as this would destroy the cohesion of the Brigade of Guards, forever
removing its traditional duty and ability to protect the sovereign.

While a firestorm of hatred
was aimed at Prince Harry from New York and Tel Aviv, there was this from his
aunt, Sarah Ferguson, Duchess of York: "I want someone to stand up for him and
say he is a very good man, and I'm that person." she said, "Because I know what
it is like to have a very bad press and to be continually criticized. It is very
tiring and it is very unpleasant."

In its
haste to demonize and vilify Prince Harry, the media pack made wild assumptions,
deliberately invented words that Prince Charles did not utter to or against
either of his sons, before wildly demanding that Prince Harry [and Prince
Wiliam], be forced to visit Auschwitz to publicly acknowledge the 'terrble
suffering of the Jews". Harry was then apparently supposed to visit the
'Holocaust Museum' in Nottingham, which is yet another tiresome Jewish
instrument used to focus public attention on the suffering of an insignificant
minority of the 57 million war dead, and 100+ million maimed and seriously
injured in World War II.

Now
then, if the Jewish lobbies were sincere in their apparent 'horror' of the
German Nazis and the millions of deaths inflicted during World War II, they
would have demanded that Prince Harry repent by going to visit British war
cemeteries full of British war dead. Now think about this, people, think about
it very carefully! Harry is British and a Protestant, and there are millions of
British war dead available - so there can be no honest motive in trying to force
the young Prince to attend garish and extravagant minority Jewish war memorials,
frequently though unwittingly subsidised by British taxpayers.

Most
readers will have heard the continual pathetic and emotional whining about
"poinson gas beng used at Auschwitz", although there is no hard scientific
evidence proving that it was. However, there is a wealth of hard evidence
proving that poison gas was first used in war by a  German Jew named Fritz
Haber, who on his first day at the front managed to kill or blind between 5,000
and 15,000 British troops with chlorine gas at Ypres, Belgium. Haber thus scored
another Jewish humanitarian first, by inventing and using "Weapons of Mass
Destruction" on live humans, for which he was later awarded the Nobel Prize for
Chemistry.

So let
us view this savage attack on Prince Harry for what it really is - a blatant
attempt to ridicule, humble, and politically neuter a potential "wild child",
who might not be prepared to see things the Jewish way in future. The Jews had a
similar problem some years ago with his mother Diana, Princess of Wales, who
dared to openly court a young Muslim named Dodi al Fayed, quite possibly with a
serious intent to wed.

If such
a marriage had been allowed to take place, an incredibly rich Muslim, directly
linked to the massive oil wealth of the Middle East, would have been is a
position to possibly influence the future King of England and his younger
brother. THe moneylenders were not going to risk any such interference by a mere
Muslim, and shortly afterwards Princess Diana and Dodi al Fayed were murdered in
Paris. Those readers interested in finding out how the double murder was carried
out, should click on the link at the bottom of this page titled "Princess Diana
Murder".

The most
interesting aspect of this particular case is how it was first triggered, and
exactly what sent the Jewish lobbies into an uncontrollable orgy of hatred and
spite. Though speculative, strong evidence suggests that Prince Harry [perhaps
in concert with Prince William and others], might have deliberately arranged the
photograph and then leaked it to the media, in order to flush the Jewish lobbies
out into the open.

First we must
examine the photograph very closely. Prince Harry is apparently casually posed
not only with a swastika on his arm, but also with a cigarette in his left hand
and a glass of scotch in his right. Thus the picture is absolutely perfect,
allowing any newspaper editor to vilify him for three different assumed offences
at the same time. Not only that. The focus and lighting has been arranged so
that Prince Harry is the only person in shot - removing any chance of other
party goers distracting newspaper editors from the central subject.

Other
unseen evidence is equally compelling. Do you remember reading that Prince
William, the future King of England, was also at the party? Indeed he was, and
because he chose not to leave, the unavoidable subliminal inference is that
Prince William must have appoved of the swastika, and thus does not like Jews. A
future King of England who doesn't like Jews? Shock, horror, and immediate
technicolor flashbacks to "Longshanks", Edward the First of England, complete
with his chopping block in the Tower of London.

Next, someone
somewhere apparently pressed an invisible 'leak to the media' button, and passed
on not only the perfect photograph of Prince Harry to "The Sun" newspaper, but
also the message that Prince Charles was "incandescent with rage and had ordered
his son to visit the death camp at Auschwitz".  Wow! With Prince Charles
[apparently] on side, the Jewish-controlled media shifted into top gear,
blasting  pictures of Prince Harry into every remote corner of the world
including Tierra Del Fuego and Timbuktu.

Such was
the level of uncontrolled Jewish lobby frenzy, that the perperators forgot or
simply ignored the fact that Prince Harry is "Prince Charming" to about two
million young British females, who were forced to watch their hero being
attacked by a pack of gray-haired dwarfs, who bore an uncanny resemblance to
their hated bank and building society managers.

These young ladies
were sorely displeased, and rumor has it that several hundred have already
purchased swastikas as fashion accessories, despite furious Jewish lobbying this
week for the swastika to be banned in all EU countries including the United
Kingdom.

The Wehrmacht
service book of  Jewish Nazi Hermann Aub

The
demonization of Prince Harry continued unchecked,  driven ever onwards by
the same uncontrolled rage and iinsanity that has recently led to the cowardly
murder of thousands of unarmed women and children in occupied Palestine, and in
occupied Iraq. If Ariel Sharon has the unquestioned power of live and death over
the Palestinians, and Paul Wolfowitz has the unquestioned power of life and
death over the Iraqis, why should British Jews not attack a "mere" British
Prince at a private party?

The orgy of
Jewish hate continued, but then Prince Charles suddenly dropped a bombshell,
stating through his official spokesman that Harry would not be sent to
Auschwitz, nor anywhere else. The heir to the British Throne made it very clear
that his son would not be "hung out to dry" for a prank at a fancy dress party.
On the same day, a palace spokesman said, "The Queen has not intervened in the
situation, she will always back her family and is supporting Prince Charles on
whatever course of action he decides is appropriate".

It
should have been game, set and match at that point, but the Jewish lobbies are
arrogant in the extreme, and completely unstoppable. Lord Levy, a senior member
of Britain's Jewish community and Prime Minister Tony Blair's special envoy to
the Middle East, joined the charge by saying he was appalled. "He [Harry] has
let the country down. The royals are meant to be ambassadors to the world but
the Prince's behaviour has sent shock waves through the international
community".

On and
on the Jewish lobbies went, completely blind to the fact that they were exposing
their ruthless determination to humble and control the British Royal Family.
Rest assured that this will never happen, and two weeks or so from now, Prince
Harry will probably have more than five million admirers, among whom will be
historians eager to discover how King Edward the First resolved Prince Harry's
current problem. The next 'Jewish Diaspora' seems to be approaching rather
quickly, at least in the United
Kingdom.

Click
Here

Update

Jewish Lobbies Try New Internet Suppression Angle

This
site recently received a unique email from a person purporting to be a legal
expert within the University of Massachusetts, allegedly writing on behalf of an
American-born author who, again allegedly, claims sole copyright of the 1940s
German photographs on this page. I use the word  'allegedly' because
nowadays it is almost impossible to authenticate the true origin of emails, a
convenient reality ruthlessly exploited by certain lobbies. Anyway, on with the
story of the ingenious email, which reads:-

"Please
be advised that copyright law protects not only original sources of documents
(including photographs), but also every compilation and publication of such
originals. In other words, a book published today with reprints of photos from
WW II or any other era, is protected by copyright law. It is a violation of the
book copyright to make any unpermitted use of material from the book, including
the photos it contains.

"The
only way for another person to publish materials contained in the book without
the book copyright holder's permission would be to obtain permission to publish
such materials from their original sources. These copyright laws apply equally
to electronic publication on the Internet as to conventional print
publication.

"Mr.
Rigg [the author of a book called Hitler's Jewish Soldiers]  is apparently
(???) requesting you to comply with the law. I am suggesting to him that he
and/or the University Press take appropriate steps to bring this matter to the
attention of enforcement agencies and your Internet Services Provider."

Now
then, let me see if I understand this intimidating email correctly. Under the
new alleged University of Massachusetts-interpreted (American) copyright law,
photographs of any dead person incapable of speaking for his or herself, can be
suppressed from world view forever by the simple process of gathering all
available photographs into a book, copyrighting that book, and then placing it
on limited sale in the public arena.

Using this fuzzy logic, sometime in the future a single author would have the
power to write an unofficial biography of indicted war criminal Ariel Sharon,
grab and use all the good photographs, describe Sharon as a 'humanitarian on a
par with Gandhi', and forever block anyone else using the material [especially
the photographs] for criticism from any other perspective at all, including the
truth.

Try to understand here, that from a truth perspective,  photographs are
every bit as damaging as fingerprints. It matters not if ten different people
swear in 100,000 written words that they thought they saw a German Jew in Nazi
uniform, because they can never prove it really happened. However, not a single
written word is required for the photograph, because like a fingerprint it
provides 100% absolute scientific proof.

Curiously I can find no support for this ingenious email in written American or
other  Copyright Law, but it does bring into sharp focus the sheer level of
Jewish anger at Prince Harry's refusal to bow the knee, and obsequiously hang
his head in shame at Auschwitz. Never mind the millions of British war dead in
Prince Harry's own country, who are obviously of no concern whatsoever to the
furious Jewish lobbies.

Wall
Street Subsidiary 'The United Nations' forgets American, British, German and
Russian War Dead. Insultingly as usual, only the 'Poor Persecuted Jews' are
mentioned

UNITED NATIONS, Jan. 24 - The UN General Assembly held on Monday a special
session to commemorate the 60th anniversary of the liberation of the Nazi death
camps, with Secretary-General Kofi Annan and world leaders calling on the world
to be on guard against a repetition of the holocaust in the future.

The day-long session is the first memorial of its kind to be held by the world
body to mark the liberation of Nazi camps in Auschwitz, southwestern Poland. It
was opened with a moment of silence, followed by speeches of General Assembly
President Jean Ping and Annan.

Marvellous! What a unique and golden opportunity for this wholly-owned Wall
Street subsidiary to acknowledge and grieve for the 57 million dead of World War
Two! Predictably perhaps, it did not do so, reserving the entire 'extraordinary'
session in New York for an insignificant number of Jews from a handful of German
labor camps.

There was no mention of all of the millions of dead  and maimed American,
British, German and Russian soldiers, who fought in appalling conditions under
the proxy  banners of 'democracy', 'communism' and 'socialism', and thus in
a deadly orchestrated charade, jointly and unwittingly helped to pave the way
for obscenely extravagant Jewish riches in the aftermath of the war.