Israeli Plan to Shoot Down British
Jet
Then blackmail the world into buying
200 billion
dollars worth of useless “Anti-Missile”
systems!

Copyright Joe Vialls. 14 August
2003

If you would like to help this keep this ailing
web site on the  Internet, you may do so by clicking on the PayPal
link below and making a donation. No amount is too small, and might keep
the reports flowing for a few weeks longer. Thank you for any assistance
you can provide.

Steve Seymour, Software Design, Click
Here

Contrary to the myth surrounding the contrived FBI
"Sting", it takes a
lot more than just a simple launch tube to shoot
down an airliner

The
sky-blue Strela launch tube "discarded" by Mossad near Mombasa Airport.
Note total lack
of residue in pictures left and right. Centre pic shows
a real Strela with wide array of
ancillary guidance equipment and power
packs needed for launch.

The
Mombasa Sting

Bali
Bomb
Jakarta
Bomb
Rumor
Mill
Vialls
Home

On Tuesday 12 August, British Airways announced that it would shortly be
commencing twice-weekly flights between London, and Basra  in
southern Iraq. As many readers will already be aware, Basra Airport is one
of the most dangerous anywhere in the world. Iraq is currently populated
by furious Iraqi citizens packing almost unlimited numbers of
shoulder-launched Strela, Gimlet, and Grouse missiles, with every one of
those citizens understandably itching for a little payback against the
American and British invaders of their
country.

Adnan Chalabi, deputy leader of the Coalition Provisional Authority in
Baghdad, made this startling request for British Airways to start
operating suicide flights to Basra. Chalabi is a known asset of the
Israeli Mossad, and is still a wanted criminal in Jordan, where he has
been sentenced in absentia to 14 years imprisonment. Note very carefully
that although Chalabi also invited a handful of local Arab airlines to
participate in the Basra flights,  no such request whatsoever was
made of any American or Israeli
airline.

Just one day later on 13 August, British Airways announced that it was
suspending all flights to Saudi Arabia. BA's decision allegedly followed,
"credible intelligence of a serious threat to UK aviation interests in
Saudi Arabia”, and  “… a plot to attack a British target, thought to
be an aircraft."  All Saudi Arabian airports have some of the
tightest security in the world, certainly far better than London Airport
Heathrow, and very few if any real or even credible “terrorists”, other
than those invented by the American and Israeli
administrations.

The “credible intelligence of a serious threat to UK aviation interests in
Saudi Arabia”, came from the Israeli Mossad in Tel Aviv, who routed the
information to the British Secret Intelligence Service [erroneously
referred to as “MI6”], before it was finally passed to British Airways via
the UK Department of Transport. Note here that only British Airways was
threatened, because every other airline servicing Saudi Arabia before this
specific warning was sent to London on 12 August, is still doing so today
without giving the matter a second
thought.

The entire “British Airways” scam is a gigantic and intentionally lethal
sting, being mounted in part to salvage the failing American and Israeli
economies, by forcing all western airlines to buy missile defense systems
for their respective fleets of aircraft at a total cost said to be in
excess of US$200
billion.

Since the first faked missile “attack” on an Israeli Arkia Airlines Boeing
757 departing Mombasa on 28 November 2002, the airlines have managed to
resist massive pressure to buy these incredibly expensive and worthless
systems, but they will finally be forced to comply when large mangled red,
white and blue chunks of a British Airways Boeing 777 are filmed scattered
across the desert near Basra, in exactly the same way that large chunks of
Pan American 103 were filmed scattered across the fields of Scotland back
in 1988.

If the Iraqis can’t or don’t manage to shoot the BA 777 out of the sky,
then the Mossad or CIA will do it for them, before artfully blaming the
catastrophe on “rogue elements of El Qaeda operating out of Saudi Arabia.”
Both intelligence services will then claim the moral high ground by
reminding Britain of the timely warning issued on 12 August 2003
concerning, “… a serious threat to UK aviation interests in Saudi
Arabia”.

As with all covert stings, this one has a clear history that can easily be
backtracked by those who are interested. As previously stated this
particular sting started in November 2002 when the Israelis claimed that
“al Qaeda” had bombed the Paradise Hotel in Mombasa, and then tried to
shoot down an Arkia Airlines Boeing 757 taking off from Mombasa
Airport.  The cover story was so shoddy that it was scientifically
possible to prove the entire claim a lie, which I did in two long reports
posted on the Internet only a few days later. For those who are not yet
aware of the Israeli Mombasa sting, there is a link to those detailed
reports at the bottom of this page.

In the wake of their very own Mombasa sting, the Israelis and associated
American companies tried desperately to interest major airlines in their
expensive “missile defense” systems, but failed completely. No one was
even remotely interested in flare-ejecting aircraft defense systems, which
in the past had proved dangerous and even fatal to military aircraft
operating in combat conditions. Just the thought of a civil airliner
taxiing up to an airport terminal loaded with 250 armed magnesium flares,
was enough to make most airline executives
shudder.

Unfortunately, when it comes to a good sales prospect, Israel and America
do not give up easily. And so it was that on Tuesday 11 February, 2003,
The Mossad in Tel Aviv sent a warning to the British Secret Intelligence
Service claiming that “al Qaeda terrorists are planning to shoot down an
aircraft at London Heathrow Airport.”  The British Government
reaction to this was most gratifying. Early on 12 February, light tanks
and armored cars swarmed all over Heathrow Airport, making the place look
more like the Gaza Strip than
London.

Soldiers frantically searched the long grass and the runway approaches
looking for “al Qaeda terrorists” concealing impossibly long missile
launch tubes in their underwear, but unsurprisingly found none at all.
Nevertheless the Israeli sales fix was in, and even members of the British
Parliament started urging the airlines to purchase the impossibly
expensive and useless “missile defense”
systems.

Unfortunately for the Israelis and their American associates, sheer panic
and verbal warnings did nothing whatever to enhance sales prospects for
the missile defense systems, so they backed off for a while. The whole
thing was starting to look a bit obvious, and there was a real danger of
“crying wolf” once too often.  Strategies and tactics were polished
up, and then, almost seven months to the day on the other side of the
world, the hype was started all over again, this time with careful
attention to forward planning and
detail.

On 10 August 2003, Australian Prime Minister John Howard warned that
aircraft belonging to Australia’s national airline Qantas had suddenly
become potential targets  for “terrorist” shoulder-launched missiles.
Where? At London Airport Heathrow, home of British Airways, that’s
where!  Then the next day Dennis Richardson, Director General of ASIO
[Australia’s Security Service], breached all security protocols and common
sense by “leaking” the contents of one of his speeches, which
unsurprisingly supported Howard’s and therefore Tel Aviv’s line on
Australian aircraft suddenly becoming targets for the mythical “al
Qaeda”.

This was a dramatic departure from standard procedures for any security
service, which normally has the primary role of defending its nation from
attack, and the secondary role of protecting its citizens from wild
unsubstantiated rumors which might result in public panic. Needless to
say, Richardson’s only external sources of information are the CIA and the
Mossad, meaning that whatever he says is likely to be outrageous, and very
probably  the exact opposite of the
truth.

Nowadays we all expect politicians to lie, but officials like Richardson
should learn to keep their big mouths shut. Direct security service
support for geopolitical initiatives, might later lead to claims of
security service involvement or actions against the very citizens it is
tasked with
protecting.

The timing here is critical, because it reveals that at the very same time
Howard and Richardson were speaking in Australia on 10 and 11 August, the
FBI shoulder-launched missile “sting” was being put into operation
somewhere in the backwoods of East Germany.  Then during the next
48-hour period on 12 and 13 August, British Airways was obliged to
announce its new service to Basra, and the withdrawal of its service to
Saudi Arabia. Things really were going like clockwork for the Mossad, and
the time had come to shift up to high
gear.

Showing the deft skills normally associated with magicians pulling rabbits
out of hats, members of the American FBI dramatically announced they had
arrested an “English arms dealer” in possession of a Russian
shoulder-launched  SA-18 “Grouse” missile, complete with all extras
but minus the operating software. Naturally, the FBI agents didn’t want
any mistakes to happen, now did they? Well, at least not in New
York.

All of a sudden the component parts of the sting all came together as if
by a minor miracle. You were told that the “Russian Security Service”
helped with the sting, but the Russians have denied this. You were told
that the suspect was an “English arms dealer”, but the British authorities
say the man is unknown to them. John Howard’s words from 10 August were
mingled in with everything else, making it “obvious” that Qantas or
British Airways aircraft are now prime targets for “al
Qaeda”.

Above all else, you were and will repeatedly be shown pictures of the
“deadly” SA-18 Grouse missile, that is now proven to be real, and which
could soon be flying right up a Boeing jet pipe somewhere very close to
YOU,  the very next time you fly Qantas or British Airways. This was
one of the best, but also one of the most muddled stings pulled in years.
The fact that anyone with the will could put its component parts together
with ease, shows the level of sheer desperation gripping both the American
and Israeli
administrations.

The simple fact remains that the airlines will still refuse to shell out
$200 billion to the Israelis and their American associates, right up to
the very point when the flaming wreckage of a red, white and blue British
Airways Boeing 777 is filmed outside Basra, probably early next month.
Then you will panic as planned, and the airlines will start seeking
massive bank loans, to purchase useless missile defense systems from the
very same people who shot the British Airways 777 down in the first
place.

If anyone out there has the correct email address for the British Airways
flight crew room at Heathrow, please pass on a copy of this report. The
crews might still fly or they might choose not to do so, but at least the
choice will be theirs to make on an informed basis. One very appropriate
solution to the problem, would be to publicly hand the exclusive rights to
this new "exciting" London-Basra route to Israel’s El Al. Then sit back
and watch the fireworks…