The
Campaign for Radical Truth in History
http://www.hoffman-info.com
Partial
list of Contents:
Churchill: Politically Correct
Exterminator; Hitler: The Dupe of
"Jewjitsu;" Just Law
Enforcement, Not Persecution; Deep
into the Psychology of Opposition;
Tall Tales; Jailers,
Inquisitors and Thought Controllers;
Lying as an Institution.
All
learning is based upon curiosity and curiosity is the unfettered exploration of
that which is interesting. The weird halo of immunity which surrounds the
Jewish nation is a highly interesting sanction and no scholar must be faulted
for defying it. To pretend that we must approach the Jewish studies with some
special reverence and reserve, fearful of causing offense, is a totalitarian
expectation.
It
will undoubtedly be the first reaction of a mind-zapped populace to immediately
regard the investigation of the negative factors within the religion of Judaism
as a horrible one, "bound to lead to another 'Holocaust."
That
the fanatical chauvinism of Jewish partisanship has been absorbed into the body
politic of the masses of non-Jews to such an overwhelming extent is a high
tribute to the power and effectiveness of Jewish propaganda.
But
this writing is not an attack but a defense. Khazars
attack Christianity every week in a newspaper column, magazine article, radio
report, film, television show or book. Few people regard such attacks as a
prelude to the further decay and eventual destruction of the Gentile people of
the West. Such Jewish attacks on Christianity are regarded as the "normal
criticism" any creed must endure at the hands of truth-seekers, scientists
and dispassionate scholars.
Within
this framework is the presumption of immunity for Judaism. According to the
mindset promoted by the System's public schools and private universities and
the Established "media" organs of mass communication, Judaism alone
among the religions of the world is immune from scholarly criticism. First
because it is perfect, being the creed of God's Master or "Chosen"
Race and second because, even if it were as flawed to the degree that secular
agnosticism asserts that every religion is flawed, it would still be wrong to
expose it as such because to do so will lead to another "Holocaust."
If
one looks beneath the sham appearances of this late 20th century, that is to
say beyond the shuttered provincialism of Jew-worship, one glimpses the
outlines of war. A relentless libel is directed at the Christian West, or what
remains of it in the ruins, in the aftermath of a half-century of constant
propaganda against it. It must be relentless to insure that no smoldering spark
shall leap up to illuminate the perpetual dark night of the modern era.
The
story of the crucifixion of an honest man at the behest of the Jewish religious
and political leadership, whose heroic committment to the truth above all else,
testified to his divine patrimony, has been for 2,000 years a permanent
stumbling block to the ascendance of Jewish world supremacy. Therefore every
attack upon the historical reality of this story and the person and morality of
Jesus has been launched by the Khazars.
Where
that has proved insufficient, the new state religion of "Holocaust"
Newspeak (absent from dictionaries before 1978) has been established by all
Western governments and by all hireling priests and preachers. By this means
Auschwitz is made to replace
But what is never factored into the
equation as the indictment of the West is prepared on this basis, is the fact
that Hitler and his National Socialist German Worker's Party rose to a fury of
indignation against Jewish people directly as a result of what Jewish
communists like Trotsky (actual
name: Leon Bronstein) and Lenin and the thoroughly-Jewish Bolshevik communist
party in Moscow had done to the Christian peasantry of Mother Russia, which the
Germans regarded as every inch a "holocaust." (The Jewish extraction
of Lenin's mother has long been known to many Russian historians and party
bureaucrats with access to inside information. Cf. "Who was a Jew? Why,
Lenin of Course!",
Both
the Jewish historian Arno Mayer in his book Why Did the Heavens Not Darken? and
the German professor of history Ernst Nolte have noted the essential link between
what the Jewish communists did to Christians in Russia as the basis for
retribution against Jewish people in German-occupied territories.
As
Prof. Nolte points out, the Jewish communists in
"...for
Hitler, Bolshevism was a genuinely terrible vision constantly before the
eyes." (Ernst Nolte, "The Holocaust Must Be Seen in Context," The
Independent, Nov. 5, 1988).
The
horrors of Jewish Bolshevism is a vision almost never seen on our telescreens
or newspaper pages. The media of mass communications have been dominated by
Khazars and their sympathizers almost since its inception. (Cf. Neal Gabler, How
the Jews Invented Hollywood and William Cash, "Kings of the
Deal," The Spectator, Oct. 29, 1994).
The
myth is that Jews were regarded suspiciously in
While
Khazars cry the loudest whenever any group or force obstructs their
ambitions--these cries being infinitely magnified by the unprecedented
brainwashing abilities of the electronic visual media--it does not necessarily
follow that Khazars are in fact the most persecuted or long-suffering of the
peoples of the world.
The
full, graphic acount of what the Jewish Communists did to
Another
objection to this writing will be that it is, by definition
"neo-Nazi" and "crypto-fascist" simply because it does
actually dare to do what Jewish historians and writers do weekly to
Christianity: criticize it.
Winston Churchill: The Politically Correct Exterminator
Then
there is the "extermination" issue. If one attempts a revaluation of
the Communist propaganda about
For
it is no less a democratic icon than Winston Churchill who advocated the
extermination of the civilian population of
In
1956 Churchill told President Eisenhower, "I am, of course, a Zionist, and
have been ever since the Balfour Declaration." ( Herbert Mitgang,
"The Official Churchill in One Volume," N.Y. Times, Nov. 6,
1991).
This
campaign of Allied extermination of the German people had been inaugurated on
May 11, 1940 when the Royal Air Force (R.A.F.) was the first to bomb cities,
in this case, German cities:
"Churchill
ordered a series of night raids on Berlin for the specific purpose of
diverting German attacks from the airfields of
But
it would not be until Arthur Harris became commander-in-chief of the R.A.F.'s
Bomber Command in February of 1942 that Churchill's plan for the extermination
of the German people by fire was attempted with total committment. "Harris
was...single-minded in his aim: the systematic destruction of German
cities....His new campaign was inaugurated on March 28, 1942 with the
234-aircraft attack on Lubeck, a medieval town, strategically insignificant but
in Harris's words, 'more like a fire-lighter than a human habitation.'
"The
Ruhr towns were attacked from March to June 1943, Hamburg from July to
November, Berlin from November until March, 1944...Using much more
sophisticated techniques of electronic navigation, of marking and of bombing,
the city was first broken up by explosives-- 'cookies' designed to blow open
doors and windows--and then rained with incendiaries. Repeated raids
overwhelmed the civil defense and fire services. Bomber Command attacked
"One
undefended city after another was devastated from end to end by explosion and
fire, 'browned' as the repellent R.A.F. phrase had it...Darmstadt was a
beautiful old town in south-west Germany, economically insignificant and
untouched until 11 September 1944, when it was 'browned' and 12,300 of its
inhabitants were killed...
"The
most famous target in this last phase was Dresden in February, 1945...But
Dresden was no different in kind from the other terror raids before...(A month
later) Wurzburg...a town of complete (military) unimportance...16 March,
1945...Bomber Command razed the town to the ground in slightly less than 20
minutes.
"What
was especially reprehensible was the way in which Churchill tried at the end of
the war to disassociate himself from the bombing... After the war Churchill
could still write--privately--to an air
"...
it (is) impossible for an Englishman born after the war to travel through
Christopher
Mayhew, former President of the Oxford Union and a British soldier stationed in
Franklin D. Roosevelt: Another Accomplice in the Attempted
Extermination of the German People
Americans
too are culpable. As historian Ronald Schaffer has documented, President
Franklin D. Roosevelt approved and encouraged the mass murder of German women
and children by the U.S. Army Air Force. A top Roosevelt staff adviser, David
T. Griggs, stated the administration's military policy explicitly when he wrote
that the effort of the
It
was American P-5l Mustang pilots who swooped down along the banks of the river
Elbe as masses of terrified German women and children huddled in the daylight
aftermath of the firebombing of
In
the decay of language that is a signpost of the Orwellian dissolution of
independent thinking in our time, the word holocaust, which by original
definition denotes death by fire, is now assigned almost exclusively to the
deaths of Jews, allegedly by gas. 600,000 German civilians deliberately burned
alive as Allied policy, receive no such "holocaust victim" status. In
fact, it is regarded as some sort of blasphemy against the canons of "The
Holocaust" civic religion that anyone other than a victim of Hitler is
described thus.
But
anyone who takes the time and trouble to read the official Strategic Bombing
Survey, prepared by the U.S. War Department, under the section "Morale
Division-Medical Branch Report: The Effect of Bombing on Health and Medical
Care in Germany," will find horrorific photographs and testimony which
testifying that the "holocaust" victims of World War Two also
included the German civilians and in the Pacific theatre, the civilian
residents of Tokyo, Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
One
survivor of the holocaust against the German people was Helga Hudepohl
who wrote, "I was in the isolation ward of a clearly marked children's
hospital in a rural area some 50 miles out side the city (of Berlin), 7 years
old and ill with scarlet fever, when the hospital was bombed to bits and pieces
by Harris' jolly group...Had there really been a fair 'Judgement at Nuremberg,'
Harris would have been one of the accused and have been sent to the gallows as
a war criminal." (Letters, N.Y. Times, Jan. 18, 1992, p. 22).
The
deliberate extermination of the German people through air power resounded among
military forces on the ground through the mouthpiece of the chief propagandist
for the Soviet empire, the Jewish Communist comunications genius, Ilya
Ehrenberg. While any college kid can invoke the name of Joseph Goebbels as
eponymous with propaganda, Ehrenburg's contribution to this infernal science is
virtually unknown.
It
was Ehrenburg who urged the troops of the Red Army, as they advanced upon the
eastern borders of a prostrate and defeated
At
In
By
the end of 1946, German civilians in the British-occupied zone were receiving
as little as 400 calories of food per day--half the ration the inmates at
When
the post-war expulsions and pogroms were over, two million German civilians
were dead and fourteen million driven from their ancestral lands in one of the
greatest acts of population-transfer in modern history.
We
are told that World War Two was "the Good War" against "Germany,
a nation conceived in hell itself" (Leslie Gelb, NY Times),
"the greatest evil ever produced on earth" (Simon Schama).
But
in so far as our psyche can disengage itself from Jewish demonizing, the
reality is that WWII was a total war, an "unlimited, unconditional
war" against not just Hitler and the Nazis but German women, children and
defenseless elderly who were held to be collectively guilty.
President
Roosevelt stated, "The German people as a whole must have it driven home
to them that the whole nation has been engaged in a lawless conspiracy against
the decencies of civilization." ( Robert Dallek, Franklin D. Roosevelt
and American Foeign Policy, pp. 472-473).
To
teach them these "decencies," Mr. Roosevelt sanctioned the policies
of the extirpation of German women and children through air force bombs and pal
"Uncle Joe" Stalin's awfully decent Red Army.
Can
there be any bloodier a killer on the earth than the do-gooder liberal?
Roosevelt's mentality was first echoed in the
Maximillien
Robespierre, leader of the French Revolution and the "reign of terror,"
wrote: "It is necessary to exterminate all those vile and scoundrely
beings who conspire eternally against the rights of man and against the
happiness of all people."
A
Jewish N.Y. Times editor, Judith Miller, along with most of the kept press,
indicted the Ayatolah Khomeni of
In
the Jewish mentality, only the enemies of Judaism must be fought
unconditionally.
From
this mentality was born Menachem Begin's
Dynastic
Christian autocrats of antiquity, equated with "persecution" and
"religious superstition" by the pundits of our "enlightened
era," never implemented any such mass murder military policy as we saw the
Allies commit in World War Two and the Israeli air force perpetrate on
The
groundwork for the military policy of total war emerged in Abraham Lincoln's
war against Southern independence; especially in the conduct of Generals
Sheridan and Sherman. In the
But
while Lincoln was martyred and subsequently canonized as a secular Federal
saint, his military practice was reversed by his successor Johnson almost
immediately and with the exception of the most foaming abolitionists, the
Southern people were soon viewed by their Northern brethren, as much wronged. A
similar revulsion occurred in
Hence
it would take the Jewish mentality, ascribing to its opponents absolute evil
unmitigated in terms of reprisals for any previous Jewish crimes, to create a
lasting marriage between modern policies and resources for total warfare and
the permanent dehumanization of the people against whom those policies are
directed, be they Germans, Palestinians or Iraqis.
It
is not only Khazars or their proxies who slaughter civilian populations. World
War I was a more than adequate example of the penchant for slaughter on the
part of senile monarchs and corrupt politicians and generals, Axis or Allied.
But it took the Jewish mentality to paint such slaughter in the terms of a perpetual
morality play wherein any crime is permissible provided it is directed against
those who have dared to raise their heads against Judaism and who, by Jewish
theological definition, can be the only criminals.
Hitler and "Jewjitsu"
The
larger question arises concerning whether Hitler really was an enemy of the
Jewish people. One does not refer here to a parochial sense of the war years
themselves but rather to their long-term consequences. Hitler as a German
nationalist who had assigned himself the task of revival of Western
civilization amid the decay, saw in the isolation, separation and if necessary,
the destruction of world Jewry, the salvation of
But
the sum effect of his effort was that Hitler was the real founder of the
Israeli state. By losing the war against the Khazars he guaranteed them the
public relations bonanza of all time and these masters of guilt-inducement took
the ball all the way to nationhood.
Hitler's
faith in the benevolence of the Judeo-masonic government of
Moreover,
his government was riddled with spies and traitors and he gave the most
important post of the entire German military, the Luftwaffe, to Göring,
who by that time had degenerated into a fat clown out of a comic opera. By 1944
the German people had a popular saying, that, "There was no roof over the
Reich." This is not to in anyway disparage the heroism of the individual
pilots and commanders of the legendary Luftwaffe's defensive fighter force,
which was the best in the world, but rather the criminal incompetence of
Göring.
The
chief supporters of the revival of Hitlerism in the world today are the Jews.
Because they hysterically denounce any honest historical discussion of the
virtues as well as the faults of the man and his regime, they are thereby
building up immense pressure within the young, who are understandably
discontented and therefore, attracted to that which Hitler represents.
When
a corrupt society wholly condemns a single individual as the "wickedest
man in the history of the world," those discontented elements of society
who are convinced that the system under which they live is profoundly evil
,will naturally gravitate toward this forbidden, near-mythic figure of evil.
Their logic will be, "If this stinking society says he was bad, he must
have been good."
The
failure to demythologize Hitler, not just in terms of Hannah Arendt's
"banality of evil," but by making an appraisal of the man independent
of the function and requirements of Allied and Jewish propaganda, would show
him to have been both good and bad; a product of his times set within the
context of the mass murder-machine the Jewish Communists had got going in
Russia from 1917 onward.
The Inner Dynamic of Judaism
Physical
persecution of the Jewish people has always and everywhere failed in European
history as a tactic for confining the kind of internal influence Pharisees have
in native societies.
Pogroms
and persecutions are completely counterproductive when dealing with the Jews.
It must be remembered that Judaism is an inherently self-destructive, paranoid
creed and the various bickering factions within Judaism are at any given time
on the verge of civil war. The only factor that can truly unite the Khazars and
make them a single force for power on the world stage, is physical persecution
and attack.
Without
such attack, they inevitably crumble from internal strife. This is why their
Sanhedrin secretly promotes and funds violent persecution of Jewish people when
such opposition is not present among the resident peasantry of a given nation.
If you want to heal the world, leave the Jews alone, physically. They will
destroy themselves or convert and reform.
The
problem is, they won't leave us alone. Whenever we get the thing they fear the
most going--when we get going what they have--community--that's when they
unleash every force in their arsenal against us.
Under
the current system, a critic of Talmudism and Phariseeism must always be
labeled as a fascist. The term is used by people who don't know what it means.
The most basic concept central to fascism is the utilization of the power of
the state through centralization, to achieve certain sanctioned ends: the unity
of the nation, the advancement of technology, the solution to the problems of
unemployment and housing.
Fascism
as a system of organization has nothing to do with opposition to Jews. The
founders of the Fascist party in
The
most successful fascist government was Franklin Roosevelt's administration
whose "New Deal" economic program marshalled the full resources of
the state to operate businesses, conduct commerce, confiscate wages and
earnings.
The
neo-Nazi invective is equally empty and like "fascist" has meaning
only as an insult intended to intimidate people who tell the truth fearlessly.
It is a manufactured attribute imposed on critics of Judaism by Jews who insist
that to expose their religion or its government in occupied Palestine to free
and irreverent inquiry is tantamount to being a militiarist, a racist and a
lover of dictatorship--and this from a militarist, racist, dictatorial Israeli
regime.
The
greatest weapon against the Zionists is exposure, to have the widest possible
study, analaysis and dissemination of their authentic teachings and practices
in every field of human endeavor. This will not only protect non-Jews but will
also help in the conversion of the Jewsish people themselves.
Unlike
the Allied mass murderers who hold the German people collectively culpable (as
historian Daniel Goldhagen has decreed), one cannot and must not hold the
Jewish people as whole collectively guilty, but only their leaders, religious
and civil, i.e the latter day Pharisees.
The
New Testament "blood taint" can no longer apply because the original
Jewish race of 2,000 years past is as dead as is the Roman race with which it
was contemporary. There is no pure "Jewish" blood today, only a
racial melting pot of Khazar, Black and Oriental races designated as
"Jewish" on the political expediency.
The
greatest allies in the struggle against the evils of Judaism have been in the
past and will be in the future, authentic converts from Judaism (for example
Nicholas of Donin and Johannes Pffeferkorn).
The
emphasis here must be on authenticity, however. The current "Jews for
Jesus" movement is a telling example of a sham conversion since this group
militantly supports the murders and racism of the Zionist Israeli state in
contravention of every Christian principle. They have attempted to make Christ
into a Pharisee. This is an abomination and these are no true converts.
"By their fruits ye shall no them."
Zionists Behind Anti-Jewish Violence
A
productive investigation for an enterprising historian would be the pursuit of
the following line of enquiry: to what extent did the Zionist Jewish leadership
encourage Hitler's violent anti-Jewish policies and to what extent do they
encourage or actually themselves commit violent attacks upon Jews today?
Rabbi
E. Schwartz, writing in the N.Y. Times of May 18, 1993: "To achieve
their goal of statehood the Zionists have always deliberately provoked
anti-Semitism...Their interest was not to save Jews, on the contrary, more
spilling of Jewish blood would strengthen their demand of the nations for the
creation of their state."
Why
would Zionists want to assist violent anti-Jewish opposition? Perhaps they
understand well that Jewish propaganda requires violent opposition to Jewry and
synagogue and cemetery vandalism, in order to expand their influence and power
and where none exist they either incite it by means of their control of
Hollywood-style, neo-Nazi front groups, or they perpetrate the actions
themselves.
Just Law Enforcement, Not Persecution
Jewish
murderers, kidnappers, rapists, usurers and those engaged in treason and
subversion can be executed by the civil authorities upon indictment,
prosecution and conviction in fair criminals trials operated within the
safeguards of the common law jury and appeal process. The critical point is
that they would be executed not because they were Jewish, but because they were
murderers, rapists, kidnappers, usurers, traitors and subversives. Moreover,
non-Jewish usury bankers, loan sharks, murderers, rapists, kidnappers and
abortionists are even more culpable than Zionist crooks and killers, since the
non-Jewish criminals are additionally guilty of betraying their own kind. These
would most certainly be liable to a death penalty for their crimes.
In
this way the ruling class, arch-criminals in the masonic and corporate elite
who seek to escape justice when Biblical forces come to power, on the basis of
their skin color or claims about their naivete,´ will be foiled. The Pharisees
could never have gotten to first base in their push for the reign of
Anti-Christ were it not for their allies among the masonic and corporate
overclass--nearly dynastic families who are attempting to impose a police state
for the benefit of bankers, lawyers, Zionists and their "Aryan"
cronies.
Equal Rights and Justice
Legal
executions of Pharisees who are guilty of crimes cannot be considered as
"violent opposition" to Jewish people because these actions would be
meted out uniformly, without regard to race or creed, on the basis of crimes
committed by any malefactor. Hence the punishment is a legal rather than a
vigilante function of the civil powers who, according to the Bible, "bear
not the sword in vain."
There
will be those who will ask, "Why accord Jewish killers--or any other
killer for that matter--benefit of law? If we know they are culpable, why not
just initiate summary executions?"
History
teaches that such vigilante acts always denegerate into a witchhunt against
innocents with whom the vigilantes have private scores and vendettas to settle,
and who exact their revenge by means of lumping their personal enemies into the
general category of "enemies of the people." Such actions are the
hallmark of the French Revolution and Bolshevism and of Oriental despotism and
Latin American societies--forms of corruption and cruelty which are inimical to
Biblical and European yeoman values.
In
a key exchange attributed to Sir Thomas More by Robert Bolt, More answers the
objections of his hot-headed son-in-law, Roper, who urges him to use his
position as Lord Chancellor to eliminate his enemies:
"Mrs.
More: While you talk, he's gone! (A reference to More's dangerous personal
enemy, Richard Rich, who has just left the house).
More:
And go he should, if he was the Devil himself, until he broke the law!
Roper:
So now you'd give the Devil benefit of law!
More:
Yes. What would you do? Cut a great road through the law to get after the
Devil?
Roper:
I'd cut down every law in
More:
Oh? And when the law was down and the Devil himself turned 'round on you--where
would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat? This country's planted thick
with laws from coast to coast...and if you cut them down--and you're just the
man to do it--do you really think you could stand upright in the winds that
would blow then? Yes, I'd give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety's
sake."
In
the preceding dialogue we observe the ethos later exhibited by the American
Revolutionaries of 1776 who were successful in winning and sustaining a
revolution based on justice and equality before the law. Khazars cannot
legitimately claim persecution under such a system of just law and enforcement.
Indeed, it is the integrity of just such a system which distinguishes our
values and way of life from those of Zionists, Oriental despots and banana
republics.
Deep into the Psychology of Opposition
Hitler's
techniques has been harnessed today in America to the ends of the contemporary
corporate, capitalist state and exhibited at great profit at every
stadium-sized, "rock muzak" concert and every "Super Bowl"
and "World Series."
If
there is any genuine, potent, corporate "neo-Nazism" extant today, it
exists on the rock stage or the pro sports field, where the same sloganeering,
and submission, as was witnessed in the techniques and adulation accorded
Hitler and the Nazi party, are put in service of the American capitalist
system. But whereas at least Hitler did these things in the name of his nation
and indigenous culture, American corporate fascism exists solely to enrich a
gangster class of money grubbers.
And
lest it be thought that we imagine that only Jews grub for lucre, the lessons
of our literature, from the American Mrs. McTeague in Frank Norris' McTeague,
who out-Jewed the Jewish ragman in avarice, to the Englishman Monks in
Charles Dickens' Oliver Twist , who outdid Fagin in villainy, and Mark
Twain's townful of crooked hypocrites in Hadleyburg, are all reminders
that we are not to imagine that white Aryans possess any immunities from evil
or that Jewish persons possess any monopoly upon them.
But
they key here is that by casting themselves as hunted fugitives from Christian
vigilantes, the Jewish psychology has been able to blackmail humanity into
tolerating the Jewish invasion of Palestine and the displacement and murder of
its people, along with control of, or inordinate influence over, the money and
mass media of every Western nation. In truth Jewish operatives have controlled
the governments of the West for decades and in some cases (
The Mentality
When
a Jewish professor of philosophy from Louisiana State Univ. attacked the late
anthropologist Joseph Campbell as an anti-semite, he phrased the attack not in
terms of the quest for the truth about the nature of the Jews, but in terms of
how Jews are "disparaged" by
In
other words,
Another
phenomenon at work is the assumption that Jews themselves have no framework of
hate within their own tradition, no "stock epithets" for Christians.
Anti-Christianism isn't even a recognized term in the English language. To
defend one's Western heritage and point to the stock epithets of
anti-Christianism prominent in Judaism, is to practice hate, according to the
received opinion of our day.
For
Jews to accuse a non-Jew of hating Jews is a noble act of human rights pique.
But for a non-Jew to accuse a Jew of hating Gentiles is itself regarded as
hateful. This mentality of the hypocritical double-standard is a Jewish
mentality.
Jews
absolve themselves of much of what they accuse others of. Syndicated columnist
Joseph Sobran states:
"The
name of this little game is keeping the goyim on the defensive at all times.
If they can't be refuted, attack them personally: Insinuate that whatever they
say in their own defense is actuated by the worst motives, motives which it
goes without saying, have no equivalent among Jews themselves, who are always
acting in self-defense. The standard public rhetoric only recognizes
anti-Semitism, it hardly imagines the possibility of anti-Gentilism...It's as
if hatred, fear, suspicion and contempt could only occur on one side.
"...There
is no hyphenated cussword in general use to stigmatize hostility to
Christianity...Leon Wieseltier can call a cross on a convent at Auschwitz
'sickening,' and nobody condemns him...Israeli soldiers can beat up a priest on
the West Bank, then shoot up his church during Mass, and only the Catholic press
takes note...If Christians had done such a thing to a synagogue, anywhere, it
would have been front-page news, everywhere. (Wanderer, Oct. 12, 1989,
p. 7; National Review, March 16, 1992, p. S-5).
Indeed,
in the fabrication of so-called, in the dreadful Newspeak of New York
Times-ese, "hate speech" law codes, law makers deliberately design
them with the concept of silencing critics of Jews on the assumption that only
the critics of the Jews are capable of hate; the supposition being that Jews are
immune to hating or if they do hate, their hatreds must be excused in light of
the "Holocaust." Michael Thomas, writing in
Timothy
Danson, a Canadian constitutional lawyer, advocates laws for the suppression of
critics of Judaism: "...the concept of freedom of speech does not entail
the protection by the courts, of malicious lies." Here we see the axiom
that anyone who criticizes Judaism is a liar. This is a totalitarian position
and makes the Jews divine in the way the European monarchs and Chinese emperors
were regarded as having "Divine Right."
Danson
goes on to say, "Anti-semitism does not fall within the category of ideas
or opinions that ought to be protected by the Canadian Charter of Rights and
Freedoms. The anti-semite has chosen hate...and therefore he need not concern
himself with truth or reason."
This
Canadian lawyer is saying that to criticize Judaism or Jews is an act of hate.
Because he is totally steeped in the Jewish version of the world this lawyer
cannot conceive of the possibility that Judaism might be a tyranny and to
criticize tyranny is liberation.
This
Canadian Constitutional lawyer states that opposition to Jews cannot be
grounded in truth or reason. That is to say, according to Mr. Danson, it is
irrational and mendacious to criticize Jews or Judaism. Here we see the
creation of a special category of immunity for Judaism.
Mr.
Danson goes further and states that those who criticize Judaism are insane
criminals: "The anti-semite's point of departure emanates from
irrationality..The anti-semite is a sadist, and in the very depths of his
heart, a criminal."
Thus
the critics of Judaism are dehumanized to the utmost: they are cruel, they are
criminals, they are crazy. Criminals and the insane have no rights and this is
precisely what this prominent Canadian constitutional lawyer is advocating:
that those who dare to criticize Judaism ("anti-semites") be denied
any rights.
But
the question springs to mind, what of Jews who criticize or hate Palestinians
or Christians, are they also insane sadists and criminals who must be dealt
with by
Mr.
Danson has the answer: "History speaks of the bloody persecution of the
Jews over the centuries." In Mr. Danson's world-view, carefully imbibed
from the official history of the Jewish version of education and information,
only Jews suffered a notable "bloody persecution." Palestinians and
Christians are cast only as the villains, never the victims of
The
psychiatricization of the issue is a commonplace. Kenneth Stern, the American
Jewish Committee's expert on "hate groups" (they mean gentile
hate groups since Jewish supremacists and terrorists are not included) and
author of A Force Upon the Plain: The American Militia Movement and the
Politics of Hate regards the militia, a Second Amendment constititional
phenomenon, as "the eruption of irrational behavior." They are also
"paranoid" and possessed of a "deteriorating mental
state." (Cf. N.Y. Times, Feb. 12, 1996, p. B-2).
Funny,
but this writer knows of a nation of people who have made a religion out of
paranoia. In fact Stern's book is filled with page after page of warnings
about an "impending pogrom" against--guess who?
History
is more than the records that issue from the official sources and the
monopolies on academic investigation. The founding leadership of the communist
movement in
One
of the bloodiest butchers of Russian Christians was Leon Bronstein, a Jew who
later changed his name to Trotsky and was the first commander of the communist
Red Army. Trotsky's great, great grandson, David Axelrod, resides in
Anti-Semanticism
What
is also very interesting about the term anti-semitism which has escaped
analysis is that the use of the phrase is itself an instrument of hate since it
is a means of equating a person with being "insane," a
"criminal" and a "sadist." Persons thus labeled are subject
to the loss of employment, housing and civil and human rights.
What
is the definition of an anti-semitic act? In so serious a crime, the felonious
conduct should be clearly indicated. In spite of much palaver to the contrary,
the definition is much akin to the logic of the Red Queen of Alice's Wonderland
who said that a word was "Anything I want it to be." Someone is an
anti-semite simply by criticizing Jews, Judaism or the Israeli state. In other
words, for doing anything that Jews deem offensive.
For
example, when journalist Patrick Buchanan criticized the Jewish role in the
formation of U.S. Middle East foreign policy, Abe Rosenthal, contributing
editor of the N.Y. Times, compared Buchanan to Nazi soldiers who forced Jews
into the
Profesor
of Literature Hugh Kenner in a letter to William F. Buckley Jr.: "The
points on which I agree with Joe Sobran are 1a)that the state of Israel is
mighty arrogant in its presumption of entitlement to U.S. handouts and general
compliance; 1b) that a large & influential U.S. Jewish population shares
this presumption...2) that 'anti-semitism' is a rather facile label for
habitual objections to 1a and 1b...I note from a recent NY Times that
Abe Rosenthal...was not satisfied with your treatment of Pat Buchanan.
"It
is surely evident that such as he will never be satisfied by anything short of
a casting of whoever annoys them into outer darkness, and I think it is a
mistake to let them control the terms of the discourse. 'Anti-semitism'--here I
agree with Joe--has no stable meaning; it can run all the way from gas ovens to
a mere wish that Abe R. would moderate his frenzies. And a term that has no
stable meaning is simply not a profitable head for rational discussions."
(National Review, March 16, 1992, p. S-22).
It
is questionable whether
The
defense against Prof. Kenner's thoughts must be in terms of the denunciation of
a heretic, a "criminally insane hater" who has the gall to deny the
True Faith of Absolute Belief in the Infallible Goodness of Judaism. The
superstructure of piety is erected over the framework of debate. The state
religion of the otherwise agnostic, terminal West emerges--the Church of the
"Holocaust"--cloaked in the moth-eaten, dusty, ermine robes not used
since the coronations of popes, czars and emperors.
High
Priest Eric Breindel of the NY Post announces that "after
The
Los Angeles Times decrees the fantastic dogma that public criticisms of Jews
are precursors of a Holocaust. (L.A. Times, Feb. 6, 1990, p. A-5).
Milking
the guilt-dogma of this state religion, the N.Y. Times alleges that "It
reeks of anti-semitism to suggest that survivors of the Holocaust are to be
condemned for establishing a haven in the only state in which Jews form the
majority." (NY Times, Dec. 17, 1991, p. 20). Here is the sacred
state-church dogma of the "Holocaust" in action as it is invoked to
block condemnation of the "holy" Israeli people and achieve political
gain for the Zionist state.
The
association of a stench with condemnation of Israeli murder and dispossession
of Palestinians effectively stops any further clearheaded analysis of the terms
the NY Times has established for dealing with Israelis. By the same logic,
Cambodians must be immune from condemnation if they murder and dispossess
ethnic Chinese and Vietnamese in
According
to Prof. Irv Abella, "The Holocaust metaphor being used against
That
we are dealing with a religious impulse rather than merely a debate between
competing ideas can be seen in the fact that the believers in the Church of the
Holocaust are unable even to imagine an alternative view. Joseph Sobran in his
published debate with William Buckley:
"An
anti-semite' in actual usage, is less often a man who hates Jews than a man certain
Jews hate. The word expresses the emotional explosion that occurs in people who
simply can't bear critical discourse about a sacred topic, and who experience
criticism as profanation and blasphemy. The term 'anti-semitism' doesn't stand
for any intelligible concept. It belongs not to the world of rational
discourse, but to the realm of imprecations and maledictions and ritual
ostracisms." (National Review, March 16, l992, p. S-5).
Sobran's
epigram about anti-semitism being more properly defined as a man Jews hate, is
corroborated by the knowledge that when Jews heatedly disagree with one another
they sometimes call each other "anti-semites." When Michael Bar-Zohar
of the Israeli Labour Party voted for religious Jews to be subject to the Israeli
army draft like all other able-bodied young Jews, he was called an
"anti-semite" and a "Nazi" by members of the Shas and Degel
HaTorah parties in the Knesset. (The Jewish Ledger, April 2, 1992, p.
24).
When
Israeli Prime Minister Yithak Rabin chose to recognize the Palestine Liberation
Organization in
It
is fitting that in this most stupid of all ages, when man has become puffed up
on his own supposed scientific grasp of the universe he presumes to have
mastered, that we should witness the crowning self-mockery of this creed of
rational modern progress, in its enslavement to the racist, superstitious
religion of Judaism, to which all good citizens of the One World Utopia must
make obeisance or stand stigmatized as "anti-see mites," a species
akin to that of an insect.
The
insect analogy is apropos. The former chief of staff of the Israeli armed
forces, Raphael Eitan, referred to the Palestinian people as "cockroaches
scurrying around in a bottle."
The
Blood and Soil ideology of Zionism which has violently dispossessed the native
Palestinians of 92% of their land and which guarantees immigration only to
Jews, is racist to the core. Equality between Arabs and Jews in the Israeli
state is a fiction. Yet, according to the N.Y. Times, to say that Zionism is
just that--organized, nationalistic racism-- "remains code language for
bigotry." (NY Times, Sept. 24, 1991, p. 30).
By
N.Y. Times logic it is an act of bigotry to point out that Zionism constitutes
bigotry against Arabs.
This is the Jewish mentality par excellence.
They've
internalized their chauvinism to such an extent that they are literally
incapable of objectivity or dispassionate examination of their own foibles,
pretensions, myths and legends. And the idea that speaking out against the
racism of Zionism, is some form of racism, is a palimpsest of fraud. Beneath
the branch of Zionism is an even more unlovely tree, the ferocious
hate-mongering at the very heart of the religion of Judaism.
Tall Tales
Only
a nation of infants who have been spoon-fed the pablum of relentless Jewish
propaganda would question the reality of Judaism's race-hate doctrines. Jewish hasbara
(propaganda) is first and foremost based on brazen lying, the more
outrageous the better. Though they have accused Hitler of the Big Lie technique
they are themselves the chief practicioners of it. In addressing the Jewish
leadership, Christ said they were, "Of your Father, a murderer and a liar
from the beginning." (John 8:44).
When
gas chamber doubter Bradley Smith placed a series of nationwide advertisements
in college newspapers for his views, Harvard Law professor Alan Dershowitz
rushed to respond, denouncing Smith nationally in print as a
"known...anti-Black racist." This was a complete lie made up out of
thin air. Said Smith, "So far as anti-Black racism goes, in all the stuff
I've written over the last 20 years I've never written a word on that issue. It
can't even be argued. It's a complete invention...They make any accusation that
comes to mind, confident that media won't try to find out the truth of the
matter." (Smith's Report, Dec. 1991, pp. 2-3).
A
few years ago National Public Radio (NPR), a taxpayer financed enterprise,
championed the cause of 72 year old David S. Rubitsky, who claimed that only
"anti-semitism" was keeping him from receiving the Congressional
Medal of Honor for having single-handedly killed more than 600 Japanese
soldiers in a battle. According to Rubitsky, he fought off waves of Japanese
soldiers in all-night fight and saved his battalion. He said Japanese bodies
were "piled like cordwood." He told reporters: "Some were still
alive. Some I just hit in the shoulder and couldn't move. Some in the legs. So
I would just shoot them and bayonet them, shoot them and bayonet them. I was a
completely insane man."
As
soon as NPR and the NY Times discovered that there was a Jew who was not
getting the highest military award, that magic explanation for all Jewish
troubles, "anti-semitism," was summoned. The Times and NPR
reflexively played the hound to the U.S. Army's hare. As it turned out,
Rubitsky's account was conclusively proved false. Rubitsky's evidence, a
Japanese inscription on a photograph, was judged by both military experts and
historians in the
However,
since this was a Jew the media were dealing with, the NY Times conceded that,
"In a reflection of the delicacy of the matter...Army officials and
members of Congress were careful not to portray Mr. Rubitsky as a deliberate
liar...simply an honorable old soldier with a foggy memory." (NY Times,
Dec. 16, pp. 1 and 14; Dec. 17, 1989; also cf. Researcher newsletter,
vol. 3, no. 5, p. 1). Indeed it must have been a very foggy night out
there in the Pacific.
One
wonders if the perpetrator of this little yarn had been an aging, hillbilly,
good ol' boy from north
The
same "foggy memories" applied in the Israeli trial of
To
say that some Jews are known for telling lies is not wrong if it is the truth.
But
the Jewish response is not to argue the point, but to categorize it and place
it in their mad panopoly of pathology. In the Jewish mentality, to indict some
Jews for a crime of which they are guilty is a form of sickness. Hence to say
that some Jews are known for a propensity to lie, will not evince an admission
from Jews that the Congressional Medal of Honor seeker was a fraud ,as are many
so-called "survivors" of the "Holocaust."
But
rather, the Jewish response is to say that accusing Jews of lying has been part
of the "familiar libels" and "stock charges" of history. No
real defense is offered, only the demand, based on the prestige and media clout
of the Jews, that they are to be believed and their critics silenced and
reviled. Elemental discourse with Jews becomes impossible under such
circumstances because Jews insist on non-negotiable absolutes: that they are,
by divine right, God's master race, and that traditional Western Civilization's
portrayal of them as money-mad, liars and extreme racists is always wrong.
This
Jewish stance necessitates an investigation into what Jewish tradition holds
about Western Christian civilization and Gentiles in general to determine if it
is Western tradition that is wrong and Jewish tradition blameless, or whether
they may be something evil within ancient Jewish tradition.
That
we have the right to sift Judaism for evil traditions is certainly a turnabout
of fair play since leading Jewish spokesmen have been condemning Western
traditions as evil since the rise of mass communications. Denying us the right
to sift their tradition for evidence of evil and criminality while they do it
to us constantly, is the Jewish mentality in action.
Take
for purposes of citation, the New Testament story of Jesus chasing the Jewish
money-lenders out of the
Yet
the facts speak for themselves: nine out of ten of the people indicted in Wall
Street insider-trading securities' fraud are Jewish. James B. Stewart's 1991
book about the chief Wall Street money-changer crook of our time, the Khazar
Michael Milken, is aptly titled Den of Thieves. The sad fact is that,
whether 2,000 years ago or now, some Jews have an innate propensity for crooked
financial dealings.
This
is admitted privately by the Jews themselves. Chaim Bermant is an orthodox
Jewish columnist for the national Zionist newspaper Jewish Chronicle based
in
Chaim
Bermant asks:
"...why
are Jews wildly successful at making money everywhere else in the world except
This
is the truth about Israelis from the mouth of a Khazar himself, whose opinion
carried enough of the ring of authenticity, to be repeated in print in a major
Jewish newspaper. Yet if you or I repeat this truth we are subject to invective
and even prosecution.
Yet
I maintain that many Irishmen have a propensity for alcoholism, many Germans
for petty bureaucracy, many Americans for mindless Babbittry, many Scotsmen for
parsimony and many Englishman for homosexuality. Whether I am right or wrong in
these characterizations should be argued on the basis of historical fact and
statistical analysis, not hysterical screaming and laws intended to criminalize
one's thoughts and writings.
In
fact, though Irishmen, Germans, Americans, Scots and English might not like
what I have to say and might counter forcefully with facts and figures of their
own to dispel my conceptions, few of them would seek to pass laws to imprison
those who hold such uncomplimentary views, probably because deep inside, these
Irish, Germans, Americans, Scots and English know their own worth as great
peoples who have led great civilizations.
Jailers, Inquisitors and Thought Controllers
It
is the Zionists who have such tremendous insecurities about their contributions
to world history and if truth be told, a clandestine knowledge of the truth of
their critics' accusations, so that they must resort to the jailer's turnkey to
maintain their world hegemony. It is because the truth carries its own special
sting that Jews call for the imprisonment of their intellectual critics.
The
persecution trombone will inevitably squeek out a long row of shrill notes at
this juncture. At long last, a comonsense approach to this subject must be
argued. If Jews habitually lie and cheat whose fault is it if they are
"persecuted" as they call it? The more proper word is prosecuted.
Moreover,
in the annals of history the Irish have been among the most persecuted people
on earth. The treatment of the Germans in the
More
importantly, we are enjoined to speak the truth no matter what the
consequences, come what may. It is the mentality of a slave to hold back or suppress
the truth because of what may result from having spoken or written it. The
"poisecution" claim of the Khazars is no grounds for refusing to tell
the truth about them.
All
learning is based upon curiosity and curiosity is the unfettered exploration of
that which is interesting. The weird halo of immunity which surrounds the
Jewish nation is a highly interesting sanction and no scholar must be faulted
for defying it. To pretend that we must approach the Jewish question with some
special reverence and reserve, fearful of causing offense, is a totalitarian
expectation.
All
investigations must be free and impartial and lead wherever the evidence leads;
anything less is Orwellian. Only in the presence of a dictator are we compelled
to exhibit a fawning sychophancy and certain Jews have become every inch the
dictators of what constitutes the "proper" bounds of writing and
research, as surely as any Ming Dynasty emperor or Stalinist commissar decreed
the perimeters for scholars in those eras.
Such
a dictatorship of the mind can only be rightfully resented.
The Talmud: The Original Hate Propaganda Volumes
What
is clear from this debate is that either one heritage or the other must be
indicted as evil: either Western Civlization was irredeemably evil for having prosecuted
and punished the saints and angels who comprised God's Chosen Representatives
on Earth, or Judaism is an evil creed which instills in its followers a
willingness to lie, cheat and murder those whom their Talmud
dehumanizes as goyim, resulting in natural resistance from non-Jews.
Isn't
it interesting that while it is considered utterly correct, moral and proper to
paint the whole of Western Civilization as evil for alleged crimes against the
Jews, it has been ruled totally inadmissible, immoral and racist to condemn
Judaism as an evil force?
In
this matter of the Talmud and the allegation that Jews ferociously hate and
despise non-Jews as part of their religious instruction, we can argue from a
body of facts and documentation which will send those liberals who are always
calling for dialogue, scurrying for the nearest police station to demand our
arrest.
They
do not want and cannot endure a frank, open dialogue on the contents of the
Jewish sacred book, the Talmud, or on the extent to which Judaism is infected
with institutional racism and hatred for non-Jews. Like any superstitious
zealot, they are content to conform to the official decree of the state
religion of "Holocaust" piety. Critical analysis and thinking independent
of received opinion--faculties cited as absolutely indispensable by liberals
when considering any other religion--are discarded when it comes to Judaism.
Here one is abjured only to bend the knee, tip the hat and be on one's way.
This
cowardly betrayal of our God-given powers of reason--also advocated by
conservatives--should anger any researcher or scholar worth his or her salt and
that anger ought to be translated into the most rigorous and thorough,
impartial examination of Judaism it is within our power to render. Such an
examination, to be valid, must begin with the Jewish sources themselves.
Whenver
the subject of hatred and racism in the Talmud is raised, certain Jewish rabbis
nearly always respond with a barrage of name-calling, coupled with a statement
that the Talmud is free of all such negativity. This is the official position,
promoted in the media intended for consumption by Gentiles. But let us see what
the Jews say in publications intended for each other.
The Jewish Press is reputed to be the
largest Jewish newspaper in
In
his column Rabbi Cohen stated, concerning the Talmud's view of
"heathens," that is, non-Jews, that they are "animals."
Rabbi Cohen writes that the Talmudic teaching that non-Jews are animals can be
found in the Talmud books Gemara Kiddushin 68a and Metzia 114b. (The Jewish
Press, Feb. 19, 1988, p. 10A).
Jewish
men are admonished not to marry a non-Jewish women because such women all have
the status of zona that is, prostitutes. According to Rabbi Samuel A.
Turk, writing in The Jewish Press of June 22, 1990, p. 38, quoting the
halachic authority, Gentiles are not allowed to marry into
Furthermore,
according to Rabbi Simcha Cohen, if a Jewish woman marries a Gentile man, she
becomes a zona, that is to say, a prostitute. Rabbi Cohen:
"...marriage
to a Gentile can never be sanctified or condoned, such a liason classifies the
woman as a zona...common parlance interprets the term zona to
refer to a prostitute..."
This
is qualified by Talmudic authorities in that a Jewish woman would not be called
a zona who conducted a prostitution service exclusively with Jewish men:
"Indeed, premarital sex of a Jewish woman to a Jewish man does not
automatically brand the woman a zona..." A Jewish woman becomes a
prostitute or zona in the eyes of the Talmud only when she marries or
otherwise has sexual relations with a non-Jew. (Jewish Press, Feb. 19,
1988, p. 8C).
The
Talmudic view of non-Jewish women as prostitutes is widespread among Jews. The
Yiddish word for a Gentile woman is shiksa, which means whore, from the
Hebrew root word, sheigetz ("abomination"). The Yiddish word
for Gentile girls is shikselke, meaning "little female
abomination." (Chaim Bermant, "Some Carefully and Carelessly Chosen
Words, Jewish Chronicle, May 17, 1991).
These
unlovely racist-Jewish appellations have been transliterated into English slang
in American popular culture in the use of the word bimbo ("stupid
whore") as an insulting description of good-looking, blonde White women. A
classic example of the Jewish hatred of such women was exhibited by Lisa
Schwarzbaum in her essay entitled "Blonde Ambition," which was
published in the NY Daily News:
"The
garden-variety bimbo of today is a woman who is inescapably blonde, inevitably
busty and invariably about as intellectual as a Cheez-Doodle...She beams her
40-watt brilliance...She's called Jessica or Donna or Marla, and she comes to
our attention because she has been spotted in a motel room with a
televangelist...City women swear we wouldn't want to trade our higher
consciousness for their low wattage. We bemoan their unfeminist feminine
wiles." (NY Daily News, May 27, 1990).
Could
it possibly be inferred from Miz Schwarzbaum's writing that she is guilty of
the "group libel" of Gentile women? Imagine the howls of condemnation
and the cries for imprisonment were a White Christian woman to pen an article
entitled, "Jewish Feminist Ambition."
The
bimbo insult, like so many other racist Jewish epithets, has been picked up by
the heartland and the mainstream and resounds through small town
With
regard to the "Who is a Jew" debate, it is officially stated in the
Establishment media, that any Gentile, if sincerely converted to Judaism under
the auspices of properly constituted orthodox rabbinic authority, becomes a
Jew. However this is by no means the unanimous view of the rabbis themselves or
of the Talmud. In fact, the Talmud decrees that "...a Gentile can obtain
some rights when he is powerful and especially when he poses a threat to
Jews." (
At
present, the Israeil state is dependent upon the good will of the Gentiles of
the West for financial support, military aid and cooperation in propagating
Israeli versions of current events and history. Therefore, at present, Gentiles
are accepted as Jews if they convert, have the proper sincerity and are
examined and received by the strict orthodox rabbis. To do otherwise would be
to reveal that Judaism is a religion of self-worship (the Jewish race is itself
god), based upon the notion of Jews being the Master Race.
For
those who search the Jewish scriptures, an inner teaching on the status of
Gentile converts to Judaism is revealed, a teaching which awaits enforcement at
a later date, when Jews are all-powerful, but which points to a mentality of
clandestine contempt orthodox Jews have toward converts to Judaism.
Hence
Rabbi Helbo in the Talmud passage T.B. Yebamos 109b states, "Proselytes
are hurtful to
More
ominous is the statement of the pre-eminent Jewish rabbi of antiquity, Shimon
Ben Yohai, to whom the Jewish holiday of Lag B'omer is dedicated. Rabbi Yohai
stated, "Even the best of the Gentiles should all be killed."
(Isidore Singer, "Gentiles,"Funk and Wagnalls Jewish Encyclopedia,
p. 617, 1907 edition; also cf. Talmud-Minor Tractates, Soferim 15, Rule
10).
Assuming
that the "best of the Gentiles," in Jewish eyes would be those who
seek to become Jews, one can suppose that Rabbi Yohai's statement will at some
future date warrant the elimination of those Gentiles in the Israeli ranks who
carry the label of convert. Though the pre-eminent Jewish law interpreter of
antiquity has commanded their death, permission to delay or counteract Jewish
law is given where Gentiles are still in a position to create a danger for
Jews.
In
discussing the Talmudic prohibition of giving food cooked specifically for Jews
to either "Gentiles or dogs," an exception is allowed: "...the
Jews were permitted in some cases to serve Gentiles food cooked only for Jews.
For example, permission was given in a case where a Gentile might feel insulted
enough to cause a danger to Jews." (Israel Shahak, Ha'aretz, April
5, 1990).
That
contempt for converts is widespread, if seldom remarked upon in the controlled,
secular media. In the Ask-the-Jewish-Lawyer column of the Canadian Jewish
News, a Jewish mother whose son married a German woman who converted to
Judaism wrote the following:
"We
never wanted her as our in-law. She cannot give us "naches"
(the feeling you get when your one-year-old starts hobbling for the first
time), being of a heritage that we do not respect as my husband is a Holocaust
survivor. We do not consider her conversion to Judaism valid. I told my son I
forbid this marital union. I would like to have his name erased from our family
name. How can we do this? We are preparing a will. Will one dollar for him be
enough...?"
Attorney
John Syrtash replied as follows: "...technically you do not have to leave
him anything in your will as a matter of law. However, as a precaution I would
put a nominal $500 in the will, along with an express statement in the will
explaining why the amount is so low as it is, drafted concisely and without
reference to your ethnic prejudices...If you are sufficiently paranoid you may
even obtain a letter from a qualified psychiatrist when revising your will to
state that at the time you signed it you were clear-headed and knew exactly
what you were doing." ("A Lawyer Replies," Canadian Jewish
News, Nov. 23, 1989, p. 12).
The
reference to "sufficient paranoia" is apposite as we wade further
into the mad-house of Jewish law and the Jewish mentality it has bred.
One
of the big areas of concentration in yeshiva schools (Talmud seminaries)
is the lofty subject of the women's mentrual flow. This august topic featured
prominently in one Talmud class as reported by the
The
Jewess Evelyn Kaye states: "In the code of Jewish law...there are 85 pages
of rules, regulations and interpretations covering every minute aspect of the
menstrual cycle...The rabbis drew up a series of definitions for 'Regular
Periods'...'Irregular periods,' which they divide up into Lunar cycles,
Same-Interval cycles and 30 Day Cycles." (The Hole in the Sheet).
This
fascination with morbid blood is evidenced in the Jewish infant circumcision
ritual or bris in the course of which blood from the lacerated penis is
sucked through a glass tube by a mohel (rabbi who specializes in
circumcisions) in an act known as metzitza. According to the rule of the
Shulchan Aruch (the codification of the Talmudic Mishnah), any mohel
who dispenses with the blood-sucking must be "removed from his
post." Using a surgical clamp to prevent bleeding also renders a bris "null
and void." According to the Talmud there must be some bleeding resulting
from the bris. "Using a clamp to prevent bleeding defeats one of
the purposes of the ritual and makes it invalid." (Cf. "Doctor
Challenges Female Mohel's Status," Canadian Jewish News, Jan. 21,
1993, p. 31).
Israel
Shahak talks about the "shock"that is "bound to occur" if
people actually "find out the truth...about...Judaism...what Judaism was
really like when Jews were governed by that Halacha" ("the
correct path," i.e as prescribed in the Talmud).
Shahak
states: "As to the concept of 'saving souls,' (piku'ach nefesh) the
Talmudic literature makes it clear to anyone who reads it, even cursorily, that
this concept is inapplicable to Gentiles. In principle it is forbidden for
Jews, including Jewish doctors, to save the life of a Gentile, for what we
could call humanitarian reasons. Saving the life of a Gentile and thereby
violating the Sabbath is even more strictly forbidden. However, in the case of
'saving the soul' of a Jew, such violation of the Sabbath is not only mandatory
it is counted as a good deed...There have been endless Halachic debates, which
still continue today, on whether 'soul saving' should apply only to Jews or
whether Jewish fear of Gentiles and their enmity should result in a
dispensation to save Gentile lives...In Israel a few years ago, the Haredi
'experts' for such matters ruled that a Jewish doctor, when he is afraid that
the authorities of any state may revoke his license if he refuses to treat
Gentiles...can obtain a dispensation, provided that during the treatment he
thinks about the dispensation rather than about the treatment itself."
(Israel Shahak, "The Status of the Gentile in Jewish Religious Law and
Israeli Politics," Ha'aretz, April 5, 1990).
Prof.
Shahak illuminates a central underlying tenet of Judaism: that it does not
express its overwhelming hostility to the non-Jewish world where it lacks the
political and military might to do so, but once it possesses that might, it
shall move swiftly against the Gentiles: "...according to Halacha a
Gentile does not possess any self-evident rights vis-a-vis a Jew. A Gentile can
obtain some rights when he is powerful and especially when he poses a threat to
Jews. The more a Gentile threatens Jewish lives, the more Halachic rights he
will be granted.
"It
therefore becomes clear that...if the Arabs do not have chemical weapons, if
their armies become weaker, and if the Intifada (Palestinian uprising) is
crushed, Halacha will not only prohibit any retreat from the territories, but
it will also prescribe the beginning of the expulsion of the Gentiles,
especially of the Christians, along with the destruction of their churches. If
a miracle happens and...Israeli influence in the
Jewish
scholar Shahak gives the Talmudic teaching on Christianity and how it is to be
treated when Jews are strong: "...the churches of the Christians in
The
words of Israeli Talmud scholar Israel Shahak, first published in the Israeli
national newspaper Ha'aretz, will come as news to most non-Jews.
Let
us tread further down the path of Jewish hatred for non-Jews. Here is the late
Rabbi Meir Kahane advocating in 1990 the mass destruction of the German people:
"When it comes to the Amalek of our times,
In
March of l986, the Israeli army's chief chaplain on the occupied
Janet
DeLynn (a.k.a. DeLynnski): "...I am glad Israel has the atomic bomb, and
the continued existence of Israel is the only cause for which I consider it
justifiable to use nuclear weapons...maybe we could have tried the A-bomb on
Germany rather than Japan...What practically speaking, can one do with a nation
(Germany) in which virtually everyone over the age of ten, twelve,
fifteen...was either a participant in or accessory to murder?" (Testimony:
Contemporary Writers Make the Holocaust Personal, p. 65, quoted in Instauration,
May, 1990, pp. 20-21).
"Rabbi
Charles Rosenzweig of
"I
had avoided Germany because I did not choose to try to keep a civil tongue or
civil face among those I felt would have stood by while my children and I were
murdered...And I felt I knew all I cared to know then about German history and
the German soul. On both, every Jew is a specialist." (A.M. Rosenthal, Press-Enterprise,
[
"In
history,
"One
of those rankling questions is why is it that Germany, which visited upon the
whole world, and especially upon the Jewish world--an unprecedented hell of
war, barbarism and assembly-line killing of millions of Jews, should have
turned out to be a prosperous, powerful and even prestigious country. We wonder
why in heaven's name, this country of savage murderers should have risen
from the ashes of defeat to become a land of tranquility with a standard of
living far above those countries which sacrificed the flower of their youth to
stop the Germans from enslaving the entire world." (Rabbi David B.
Hollander, "The Torah," Jewish Press, December 8, 1989).
"Germans
are an abomination to me. I'm glad
"The
two greatest evils of this century...both came out of
"Let
The
world will be saved, "...if the world were to acknowledge its collective
guilt against the Jewish people." (Moshe Holczler, "Open Your Eyes,
World," The Jewish Press, Nov. 23, 1990, p. 12).
"Hostility
toward non-Jews has along history in the Jewish world...It's no secret that Jews
disparage non-Jews behind their backs. Some Jews brag about tricking them in
business, others shun them socially. The Yiddish phrase goyishe kup (a
non-Jewish head), indicates someone stupid or foolish. In Jewish literature,
the non-Jew is often portrayed as someone who is untrustworthy, dangerous or
hateful." (Michael Lerner, Utne Reader, Jan./Feb. 1991).
Imagine
that a former mental patient, who now heads the Texas Ku Klux Klan, is driving
through the Black ghetto in
What
would have been the reaction of the
A
case equivalent to this happened in the Israeli state.
Moshe
Levinger, a Jew who spent "some of his youth" in a Swiss psychiatric
facility, is the head of the Gush Emunim, a Zionist settler group which
believes that Arabs "are dogs" and that Palestinian land must be
taken by force of arms.
On
Sept. 30, 1988, Rabbi Levinger was driving through the Palestinian
He
was sentenced to serve five months in prison and was honored at a celebration
prior to beginning his sentence which was attended by well-wishers including
Israeli General Yitzhak Mordecai, military commander of the West Bank as well
as the President of Israel, Chaim Herzog. A religious ruling on Rabbi
Levinger's attack was prepared by Rabbi Moshe Neriya and published in the
national Israeli newspaper Ha'aretz of May 13, 1989, in which the rabbi
ruled that every Jew has the duty "to shoot [Arabs] left and right without
thinking and without hesitating."
Rabbi
Moshe Levinger was released from prison after serving two and one-half months
of his sentence. The sentence reflected the religious opinion of Rabbi Yitzhak
Ginsburg, who has offered "justification for the view that the spilling of
non-Jewish blood was a lesser offense than the spilling of Jewish blood. 'Any
trial based on the assumption that Jews and goyim are equal, is a total
travesty of justice,' he said. (N.Y. Times, June 6, 1989, p. 5).
Has
the reader even heard of Rabbi Levinger much less what he did or the ten weeks
he spent in jail for the murder of a Palstinian bystander?
In
July of 1983, Levinger's son-in-law and other members of the Zionist Makhteret
(Underground), described as "the most violent anti-Arab terrorist
organization since the birth of the Jewish state...burst into the courtyard of
the Islamic College in Hebron during a noon lunch break, tossing a grenade and
spraying machine gun fire. Three Palestinian students were killed and thirty-three
injured. 'Whoever did this,' declared Rabbi Levinger, 'has sanctified God's
name in public."
In
May of 1990, 21 year old Israeli Amri Popper walked to the Rishon le Zion
market where Palestinian day laborers awaited work. Popper opened fire on them
with an assault rifle, killing seven men and wounding ten. Israeli motorists
got out of their cars and danced the hora among the carnage. As the
Palestinians bled to death, one dancing Jew asked, "What, only seven
dead?"
The
Israeli army subsequently shot to death seven more Palestinians on the same day
and wounded several hundred more.
"There
is no doubt that the Rishon le Zion gunman acted within a society in which the
norm exists that Arab life is cheap...treating Levinger like a hero have
created this norm..." (L.A. Times, May 23, 1990, p. 4).
On
October 8, 1990, the first day of Sukkoth, the Jewish feast of booths,
the Israeli army opened fire on a crowd of Palestinians at the
17
Palestinian civilians had been shot to death by the Israeli army and police.
The victims were blamed, even though no Jews were injured by any mass
"rock-throwing" as Israeli magistrate Ezra Kama would admit in July,
1991. The official government view became the media's view. "The story
seemed to die." The hasbara was having its effect as predicted.
What
if 17 Jewish civilians had been shot to death by an Arab government, would the
mdia accept the official Arab version as their own? After an initial flurry
would the story have been left to die or would it have been made into the Movie
of the Week from the Jewish victims' point of view?
As
it turned out, to his credit, 60 Minutes' TV reporter Mike Wallace
investigated the case and produced a truthful national network program on the
atrocity the Jews committed. Wallace documented that the Israeli massacre of
the Palestinians was an unprovoked, brutal crime.
"60
Minutes was also inundated with complaints from mainstream American Jewish
organizations and powerful, pro-Israel supporters. At a New York dinner party, 60
Minutes executive producer Don Hewitt got into a shouting match with ABC
television's Barbara Walters, the real estate developer and publisher of U.S.
News and World Report Mortimer Zuckerman and Mort Janklow, a literary agent,
over the Temple Mount segment...A furious CBS chairman Laurence Tisch summoned
Hewitt and Wallace...Tisch is an influential figure in the New York United
Jewish Appeal-Federation ...Tisch felt the piece was unfair...(and) required
more background reporting." (Friedman, op. cit., p. 133).
Rehavam
Ze'evi, member of the Israeli Knesset stated, "Every Jew is worth a
thousand Arabs." (Al-Fajr, Nov. 6, 1989, p. 15).
"...Prof.
Dan Scheuftan of the
"Commercial
Hebrew children's literature published in
"The
characteristic image of Arabs in commercial Hebrew children's literature is a
grim one. The Arab appears as a criminal...Arabs are also depicted as thieves,
stealing because theft is part of their nature, especially from Jews because of
'envy.' Arabs are also shown as swindlers...Arabs are base...Arabs are
cowards...Arabs are idiots...Arabs prefer that non-Arabs tell them what to do.
Arabs are liars whose word cannot be trusted and whose promises should not be
taken seriously. Arabs are dirty in mind...
"There
are several reasons for this negative portrayal of Arabs. First is the need to
eliminate any respect for Arabs among Jews...Eradicating respect also
dehumanizes, thereby rendering acceptable whatever befalls the dehumanized
party, including exile, dispossession or even death." (F.E. Asmar,
"Israeli Children Imbibe Racism," Guardian Special Edition, Spring,
1987, p. 21).
"Forty
percent of Israeli Jewish high school pupils hate all, or almost all, Arabs,
according to the first comprehensive survey conducted since the outbreak ofthe
intifada...
"The
present survey--completed over a period of two years--was conducted by Ofra
Meizels, Reuven Gal and Eli Fishof of the
The
hatred of the Arabs does not raise the human rights hackles of the liberal and
conservative Gentile apologists for Zionism because this hatred is supposedly a
justifiable reaction on the part of Jews to Arab terrorism.
By
the same token, Jewish hatred for Christianity and Jesus Christ are excused on the
basis of what the Christians have done to the Jews, making hatred of Christians
permissible. One of the many confirmed anti-Christian bigots among the Jews is
the writer Hyam Maccoby. His book falsifying the Gospels, Judas Iscariot and
the Myth of Jewish Evil, is an excellent example of venomous hatred of
Christians presented under the guise of promoting the welfare of the Jews. It
seems that under this shibboleth, waved like the proverbial magic wand before
the eyes of Gentiles, the most vitriolic anti-Christian prejudice is summoned
up without protest from the target peoples. By this clever Jewish technique,
"fighting racism" is invoked in order to spread racist hatred for
Christians and Palestinians.
In
Maccoby's book the existence of the Jewish Judas and his act of betrayal, for
which Christ said it would have been better had Judas never been born, is
denied. According to Maccoby, the whole Judas episode was a Christian plot
concocted out of thin air in order to defame the Jews.
Paul
Johnson, writing in the London Sunday Telegraph (Feb. 23, 1992) states
that Maccoby's book is not so much scholarly as an anti-Christian polemic and
that, "...the book betrays a certain paranoid attitude to
Christianity...the book is not an open-minded inquiry into the reality of
Judas. On the contrary it starts with a conclusion and then proceeds to amass
the evidence to justify it. This leads him into all kinds of difficulties,
notably in disposing of the name 'Iscariot,' where he is at his least plausible.
It also obliges him to predicate that the Evangelists and the writer of Acts,
were constantly engaged in unscrupulous propagandist inventions for base
politico-ecclesiastical purposes. On other occasions however, when their
evidence happens to fit in with his theory, they are reliable
sources...Maccoby, in short, is too obsessed...to write an objective account of
Judas."
In
the Jewish mentality, opposing the stereotype of Judas as a cardboard "Jew
devil," even to the extent of denying he existed, and attributing the
accounts of his treachery to "propagandist inventions" by the Church,
is a worthy and necessary endeavor on the part of Jewish writers.
However,
when Christians truthfully attempt to wade through the wild tales and
exaggerations which attend the so-called "genocide" of Jews in World
War Two, because they see in such exaggerations, the unmistakeable outline of a
cardboard "Christian devil" being mounted by Zionist propaganda, such
an endeavor raises a howl of protest from Jews and dark intimations about the
motives of those who would seek to correct the record and defend Christianity
from libel.
Thus
the equation is submitted to the old Jewish insistence on special privileges
and status above mankind. They, the Master Race, have the right to investigate
historical stories, like the tale of Judas, which create legends of Jewish
deviltry. But for the mere goyim to do the same, to dare to investigate Jewish
tales which foment legends of Christian deviltry--this becomes an unpardonable
sin against the majesty of Jewish omniscience, infallibility and suzerainty.
In
a similar manner the Jews have created for themselves a license to agitate for
Jewish racial purity and apartheid for Palestinians, at a time in the modern
era when talk of race purity and racial separation are grounds for imprisonment
in Britian,
For
example, mainstream Jewish groups regularly run advertisements in national
liberal newspapers such as the NY Times and in their own religious
Jewish publications calling for Jewish racial purity.
In
the December, 1989 Jewish Chronicle a large ad appears, placed by the
"Jewish Seminar Movement" (Chofetz Chayim Torah). The text of
the ad asks, "An Urgent Call to World Jewry...Do you realize we are in
dire danger of losing millions of precious Jewish souls through
intermarriage?...That the children of intermarriage grow up with complexes and
confusion? If you or your friends are on the verge of internarriage, we plead
with you, do not allow a temporary infatuation to ruin your life, the lives of
your dear children and help to destroy our cherished and beloved Jewish people."
Imagine
if a White heritage group, distressed over the demographic fact that only one
in twenty-six of the world's people are White, were to take out national ads
arguing against Whites "inter-marrying" with other races, thereby
"helping to destroy our cherished and belowed White race." The
outrage, the weeping, wailing and gnashing of teeth would resound from the
editorial pages of the Hoboken Cornstalk Trombone to the halls of the United
Nations and media sattelites circling the globe in outer space. Leading the
attack would be "Jewish service and humanitarian groups," because
Jews reserve to themselves alone the right to racial purity and racial
separation.
Jeffrey
Kwintner, a Jew, writing in the Jewish Chronicle of Dec. 29, 1989 says:
"...Jews are the only exception. They were destined to be unique. The
concept of racial purity within the Jewish nation is not a myth...The only
facts to determine Jewishness should be purely an hereditary one regardles of
Jewish observance. A Jew is someone from Jewish stock. No one can make a
gentile Jewish...We must retain our own exclusivity in order to survive and not
be infiltrated by outsiders..."
When
the Aryan Nations group established a headquaters in the
No
such solution or separation is permitted White Christians in
The
grandiose vision of the Jewish race with its special immunities, privileges and
rights was articulated by President Ronald Reagan in a memorable passage from
his 1988 speech to dedicate the cornerstone of the
In
other words, while the decline of our American cities is inevitable, the
decline of the Jews is not. Those who have hastened the decline of our Republic
and who curse non-Jews in the texts of their Talmudic books daily and
routinely, will be around to pick up the pieces long after all else is in
ruins.
For
the babysitter of Bonzo the Chimp and his constituency of "Reagan
Republicans" and "Reagan Democrats," this is a prophecy to be
celebrated and applauded.
The
Jew Samuel Gringauz, writing in the January, 1950 issue of Jewish Social
Studies, referred to the personal, "eyewitness" testimony of Jews
concerning the events of World War Two, as "full of preposterous
verbosity, exaggeration, dramatic effects...unchecked rumors, bias..."
Historian
Gerald Reitlinger, author of a standard reference work on what is termed the
"Holocaust," states in his book The Final Solution, "...the
Eastern European Jew is a natural rhetorician speaking in flowery
similes...sometimes the imagery transcends credibility."
Lying as an Institution
Lying
to Gentiles is institutionalized within the Jewish religion in the Kol Nidre
rite, when all oaths that were broken in the preceding year, are rendered
null and void.
Let
us examine a few of the testimonies of the Jews who claim to have lived through
World War Two and who are labeled by the instrument of Orwellian Newspeak as
"Survivors of The Holocaust."
In
an "Op Ed" piece in the Los Angeles Times, April 30, 1981,
part II, p. 11 a Jewess named Rachel Patron writes an essay devoted entirely to
the theme of the most horrifying scene she observed during the war: bars of
soap made from "the fat of dead Jews." The article is accompanied by
a drawing of a little girl who has scooped nearly a dozen bars of such soap in
her apron. Patron writes:
"Mama,
Mama, look what I found!' I cried as I ran across the tracks, holding on to the
bottom of my skirt, which I'd filled with bars of soap...My mother and I stood
in front of the open door, she turning the bar of soap over and over in her
hand, while both of mine clutched the skirt holding my treasure. Suddenly
mother's face turned ashen and her eyes opened wide with fear, as if locked on
the sight of a terrible monster coming to devour her. She said nothing but her
fear communicated itself to me and I began screaming, 'Mama, Mama, what
happened? What's wrong?'
"She
still said nothing. I thought she couldn't hear me......I started to tremble
and then I screamed as loudly as I could and stomped my feet hysterically
because I was terribly frightened and I didn't know why. So she had to tell me;
not knowing would do me even more harm.
"Grasping
me by the shoulders, she said, 'R.J.F. means Rein Judisch Fett!' She
said it in German, but I understood; it sounds the same in Yiddish: Pure Jewish
Fat.
"I
let go of the bottom of my dress and all the soap came crashing to the floor,
many of the bars chipping and losing their smooth surface. I bent down and
started throwing them out of the train, one by one, looking down to see them
crushed between the sharp wheels and the steel rails. And all the time tears
were rolling out of my eyes..."
This
is a certainly a very heart-rending story, a bit sensational and sentimental
perhaps, but one of the thousands of tales of German perfidy retailed in the
mass media including such august Establishment organs as the
There
is only one problem with the many "Jewish survivor" stories about
bars of soap from Jewish fat: Jewish historians themselves admit that this was
Allied atrocity propaganda and that it never happened.
In
World War One the same idiotic story was told about the Germans by the Allies
only in that case the claim was made that Germans made the soap from the bodies
of British soldiers.
One
cannot lay culpability for such war-time yarns at the door of the Jew alone for
virtually every war in history has produced wild exaggerations about enemy
forces which kings, generals and politicians have sought to exploit in order to
excite their populations to greater sacrifices and martial frenzy.
During
the French revolution Robespierre was accused of eating the roasted flesh of
priests and of creating a tannery for human skin for making shoes for the sansculottes.
(Le Blond de Neuveglise [probably a pseudonym of the Abbe Proyart], La
vie et les crimes de Maximilien Robespierre, p. 279).
Robespierre
in turn manufactured atrocity propaganda against
What
makes the Second World War different is that it is the first war in which,
after it was concluded, the atrocity propaganda was not discredited, but was in
fact escalated. Hence in 1981 the prestigious L.A. Times devoted a large
part of its editorial page to a lunatic bar of soap hoax cooked up by the
Allies 35 years before. The "bars of soap from Jewish fat" tale
continues to make the rounds of films, books, classrooms and newspapers, the
better to permanently stigmatize the German people and the Christian
civilization of
"Professor
Yehuda Bauer, head of the Hebrew Univserity's Holocaust history department and
regarded as one of the foremost researchers of the Holocsaust, has denied the
frequently quoted charge that the Nazis used the bodies of Jewish death camp
victims to make soap... 'We do not have to go on believing untrue stories,'
Bauer said.
"Raul
Hilberg, professor of political science at the
"There
were all kinds of rumors,' he said, noting that a NY Times article
during the war suggested that Jews were given lethal injections before
deportation...Other rumors speculated that Jews were killed in the Belzec camp
by electrocution in water... 'All these rumors are untrue, based on nothing at
all,' Hilberg said. 'No evidence has turned up' to suggest that the Nazis used
human fat to make soap." (Hugh Orgel, Jewish Telegraph Agency, Northern
California Jewish Bulletin, April 27, 1990).
Whatever
Hilberg and Bauer may say about the rumor-mongering and atrocity tales, the
mass media continues to report them as totally truthful, straight news. No
matter how preposterous or idiotic, no skepticism is shown, no probing
questions asked. We are dealing with a religion here, the most sacred in the
world!
The
BBC made a Timewatch documentary about a group of Polish Jews who are
alleged to have "survived the Holocaust by living like and with, the rats
in the sewers of
Then
there is the Zeiger family of seven, who for "two terrifying years"
beginning in 1942, lived in a "4-foot-deep hole" under Antosh
Suchinsky's barn, "afraid to light even a candle.... The quarters were so
cramped the adults could not even stand. 'I cannot tell you how horrible the
conditions were. There was no air, no food, no light." (Gazette
Telegraph, May 28, 1988).
Vera
Kriegel recalls the day in
A
Jew named Morris Hubert claims to have been sent to
Or
how about Berta Yozawitz of
Rabbi
Dr. Moshe Weiss informs us: "...Nazis transported from the Auschwitz camp
to
A
French magazine, National Hebdo (May 31, 1990) details how the sacred
Auschwitz death toll has fallen dramatically over the years: from 8 million
(French War Crimes Research Office), to 5 million (Le Monde, April 20,
1978) to 4 million (the figure advertised at Auschwitz-Birkenau up until 1990)
to 3 million (the "confessions" of Rudolf Hoss) to 1. 6 million
(Prof. Yehuda Bauer); to 1.25 million (Prof. Raul Hilberg) to 850,000 (Gerald
Reitlinger, The Final Solution), to 75,000 (
This concludes chapter one in volume one of THE JEWISH
MENTALITY by Michael A. Hoffman II
Copyright
©1996 by Michael A. Hoffman II. All Rights Reserved.
Published
electronically by The Campaign for Radical Truth in History. This copyrighted
material may not be reproduced in any format without permission in writing.
http://www.hoffman-info.com