|
|
|
|
|
AntiSemitism
is a Disease
(You Catch It from Jews)
by Edgar J. Steele
October 24, 2002
"The jew cries out in pain, as he strikes you."
--- Polish
proverb
I didn't intend for this weekly effort to turn into an inquisition of things jewish, but it is difficult to change course once set. Consider what it takes to bring an ocean-going liner around to a new heading and you have some concept of my difficulty with jumping from topic to topic.
The response to my last three essays has been overwhelming, to say the least -- both pro and con. Much of the con has taken the form of attempting to shut me down, but they will get this pen away from me when they pry it from my cold, dead hands, rest assured.
In particular, I want to address voting before the elections in two weeks. In case I don't get there, here is the punch line of what I want to say: Don't just not vote, as most Americans have (not) been doing, of late. Better by far to make a statement.
Not voting just plays into their hands. It is easy to make a statement, though: Vote for anybody, just don't vote for anybody running under the label Democrat or Republican. The sole exception is if you live in Texas and Ron Paul appears on your ballot. If enough of us do this, we might actually make a difference (of course, that assumes that election results will be tallied and reported accurately, which is quite an assumption).
But, it's something we can do while we wait for the right time to start shooting the bastards.
····
I mentioned last week that Mark Wiles, the Nevada-based JDL thug who previously had threatened me and whose fellow travelers had threatened to kill my children, had popped up again with an acerbic email which amounted to yet another veiled threat. When he thought it was just the two of us exchanging emails, he was menacing and contemptuous.
When Wiles realized that I had circulated his missive, together with my response, rather extensively over the Internet, he became meek and conciliatory, suggesting that he had become the "victim" of my harassment. The Poles were absolutely correct in identifying this rather typical jewish behavior with their proverb, quoted above.
Every time I say something by which jews are offended, they launch a new assault, thinking that will silence me. Rarely does that tactic work with anybody; never will it work with me. This is the typical jewish response and why they have been ejected from every country in which they have achieved supremacy, as they now have done in America. They really don't seem to realize that they create the very thing they decry.
Wiles, of course, accused me of being anti-semitic, the trump card employed by jews everywhere. He likened it to a disease. My response: "Yes, it is a disease - you catch it from jews." He hasn't responded since.
You do catch it from jews, you know.
Not too many years ago, I thought the same as most Americans - jews are just like the rest of us; they go to a different church, is all. My experiences since have taught me otherwise. My teachers: jews.
A fellow on this list, who happens to be a personal friend of mine, poses the following question:
"Edgar, what is meant when one is called a "Jew?" Where did the name derive from? What does it mean when someone calling themselves a Jew says "they themselves, or....someone else, is a Jew? - (this one... how a "Jew" explains this, may be most important). Do you know a Jew who would earnestly answer this question for us who wish to know? Surprisingly, to this Christian. and many other Christians, there is much confusion over this word. It seems there are a lot of different definitions and understandings of the word 'Jew.'"
- Jack
An interesting question, and not one that I have encountered in quite this form before. Striking in its simplicity and engaging for its implications. So often we argue things, assuming that we agree on the fundamentals, thereby dooming ourselves to argue forever. This, I think, is one of those fundamentals about which we think we all agree, yet don't.
Jack, I am flattered that you would think I
have this answer. So many academics claim to have a lock on it, academics who have studied it far more than I, after all. On second thought, they are the last that I would want to consult.
A plain-language, "real-world" definition is what I sense that you
seek. Let's see if I can do your question justice.
Jew is a term that, like so many, has morphed in recent times.
Traditionally, it refers to one persuaded of Judaism, but that is far from what we really mean today when we use the term. There really is nothing religious about it, though jews love to erect the religious defense when it suits their purpose.
Jews, generally, will say that it is a
religious label. Some will acknowledge the racial aspect.
However, there should be no confusion between modern-day judaism and the Jews mentioned in the Bible. There
simply is no connection that can be established between them. Many today consider Christians of one flavor or another to be the rightful heirs to the Biblical
mantle of Jewishness. They have as much claim to the title as any, I suppose. Many
carry on this dialogue extensively, but none can prove their thesis
definitively.
Bush and Ashcroft both claim to be Christians, for example, but a strong argument could be made that they are mere wolves in sheep's
clothing, if not the embodiment of the AntiChrist, himself. A similar argument can be spun concerning those who call themselves jews today.
I submit that it does not matter.
What matters is what we mean by the word
today, and what is meant by those who actively, with our assistance, call
themselves "jews."
Discarding the Biblical/Talmudic connection is necessary to properly evaluate
what we mean by "jew" today, regardless of what a jew actually may be.
Jews simply cannot be defined in terms of modern religious terms. Israel, for example, is predominantly atheistic, yet every citizen of that country considers him or herself to be jewish.
A large part of defining anything is defining what it is not, and being jewish has nothing to do with religion.
Many submit that it is largely a state of mind, a question of intent, if you will. These people tend to be the ones who assiduously employ the term "zionist." Zionist is another of those terms. I tend to see a zionist as being far more than simply one who advocates an independent Israel, however. I equate zionism with jewish supremacists, those who believe that jews are superior to the rest of us and deserve to be our masters.
Those who assail zionists tend to give a pass to jews who declaim responsibility for what is being perpetrated in the Middle East. Generally, though, they refuse to see how thoroughly America has become zionized. By their definition, one would have to throw all the American shabbas goy (those who do the jews' forbidden work on their Sabbath) into the class of zionists, by virtue of their intent, starting with George Bush.
Bill Clinton also springs to mind, he who recently said he would defend Israel with a rifle and give up his life, needs be, in so doing. Of course, Bill couldn't be bothered to do the same for America when his number came up during the Viet Nam era (neither could George Bush or John Ashcroft, for that matter). Bill got his turn at the trough, as did Bush, by doing the bidding of his NWO handlers, who are overwhelmingly zionist jews.
So, I have to decouple the term "zionist" from "jew," as well. One does not become jew by intent, except in name only when one converts to judaism. But, then, I have already said it's not a religious thing, anyway. Sammy Davis, Jr., wasn't really jewish, no matter what he said or did.
Doesn't leave much, once you eliminate religion and state of mind as being the defining characteristics of "jew," does it? Well, in fact, it does. It leaves a great deal. It leaves race. Some would say that it's strictly culture; i.e., habits and customs, but they are being disingenuous.
I respond that race is culture gone to seed and reborn genetically. Breed your weird housecat to the weird cat next door and you almost certainly will end up with a litter of weird kittens. Behavior is merely one of many things that differentiate one race from another.
I happen to believe that creationism and evolutionary theory are not incompatible. Once created, why couldn't species then evolve? In fact, might not that be the intended scheme? Believing in evolution does not mean you have to buy into the way it is taught, by the way. I sincerely doubt that much about modern evolutionary thinking is accurate.
Being jewish is a racial thing, pure and simple. Some of us are born Asians, some are born Caucasians and some are born jewish, among other races extant.
There are two primary types of jews recognized today: Sephardic and Khazar.
Sephardic jews make up about 10% of all jews and, oddly enough, are truly second-class citizens in jewish society. They have the true semitic features, including olive skin, and ancestry. Only the Sephardic jews originated in the Middle East. Only the Sephardic jews have even a colorable claim to Israel.
Khazaric jews are descended from eastern Europeans who converted en masse to Judaism several hundred years ago, by edict of their king. There are differing accounts as to why. Some say because the king favored the written form of the jewish language (few languages were written at the time and he realized the time had come for his country to get with the times in this regard). Others say it was political and dictated by the religions of the surrounding countries. Khazaric jews manifest the pronounced physical features generally attributed to jews: short, squat, hook nose, generally unattractive, but highly intelligent and possessed of a very aggressive demeanor.
A friend of mine, a true academic in every sense of the word, responds to Jack's question as follows:
"Ben Freedman, a Jew who converted to Catholicism, commented extensively on this topic. In his book, "Facts are Facts," he relates how, originally, Jew meant a resident of Judea, a Roman province acquired by conquest of its former Greek masters. The population was ethnically mixed, predominantly Greek speaking. The sons of Abraham residing there were of the Mosaic faith. Those of Greek ethnicity were probably adherents of the Greek religion.
"There may have been extensive mixing of these religious traditions as would be expected in any area where two populations had been mixed for hundreds of years. There is historical evidence for an Essene Christian Faith which predates Christianity in the area, notably mixing Greek Dionysian rites with those of the Mosaic faith, including the belief in ritual crucifixion and resurrection as part of the coming of spring, coincidentally around Easter time.
"The New Testament refers to Judeans in the original Greek, not "Jews." Mr. Freedman emphasizes that the word Jew does not appear in writing until the middle ages when it was used in old English to denote those people who we now recognize as "Jews," namely an organized crime syndicate, tied by blood and "religious" ritual having international reach. The English, as well as other Europeans, apparently believed that these criminals had some tie to the people of Judea, perhaps because they said so.
"This misconception is similar to the reference to "gypsies" which comes from the belief that gypsies came from Egypt. In fact, they seem to have appeared out of northern India.
"The best evidence is that greater than 90% of the self-styled "Jews" have no historical connection to the middle east but rather are a mongolian Turkic people called Khazars who converted to the monotheistic beliefs of Judaism in the 8th century when they resided in a kingdom known as Khazaria where the Volga flows into the Caspian Sea. Subsequent to their conversion, they adopted the name of the religion of Judea as part of their identity and called themselves "Jews."
"Genetic studies have shown that these "Jews" are actually a separate group and are recognized by Jews as such. They are called Askenazim to differentiate themselves from those "Jews" of North African origin known as "Sephardim" from the Hebrew word for Spain, as they entered Spain with the moorish invasion of the Iberian peninsula. Both groups are united in their hatred of Europeans and in their propensity to accumulate money at the expense of all else, often through criminal enterprise and other activities at the fringe of moral society. In this, they share certain traits with the gypsies."
-Al
At minimum, it is clear that Khazar jews are the problem. They like to pretend it's cultural, the differences between them and the rest of us. It isn't. It's inherited. It's encoded in their DNA. Maybe it was cultural at one time, but it has evolved into racial behavior today. They are genetically predisposed to being aggressive, manipulative and predatory. It's racial.
Clearly, physical characteristics get handed down. Equally clearly, IQ gets handed down, as well, despite how politically incorrect it may be to recognize that there is about a 15-point gulf between jews and Caucasians, the same gap which exists between Caucasians and American blacks, by the way.
Why is it so hard to believe that disposition and demeanor are also inherited? Those with children are well aware of how we all come to life with baggage. What is missed is just how extensive that baggage really is.
My wife and I breed and raise registered horses. One of the defining characteristics of a desirable horse is demeanor and disposition. It is clear to those in the business that these characteristics can be bred, just as coloration, speed and size are bred.
Human beings are no different. It's the set of differences that distinguishes between the races. It isn't just skin deep, but then you knew that, didn't you?
And that business about jews having higher IQs? It's true, of course. When you possess something in common with a group that clearly sets you apart from others and gives you definite advantages, then it is easy to consider yourself superior, generally, to others. That is the trap into which jews have fallen and which provides their ultimate Achilles heel.
Smarter? In certain ways, to be sure. Better? No. Don't forget that they have been ejected from country after country after country. So what if they are in charge in America today?
Shucks, boy, we ain't played cowboys and
jews yet!
Copyright © Edgar J. Steele, 2002
Forward as you wish. Permission is granted to circulate
among private individuals and groups, post on all Internet
sites and publish in full in all not-for-profit publications.
Contact author for all other rights, which are reserved.
On-Line link to this article in HTML format: http://www.conspiracypenpal.com/columns/anti.htm
------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: Send email with "subscribe" in subject line to subscribe@conspiracypenpal.com
Unsubscribe: Send email with "unsubscribe" in subject line to unsubscribe@conspiracypenpal.com
------------------------------------------------------------------
Anti-Spam Policy and Disclaimer: If you have received this email and it was unsolicited, please accept our apologies. If received directly from us, merely click the Unsubscribe link above and click send. Please understand there is nothing we can do to stop this message being forwarded by another, which you can determine by inspecting the header embedded herein. Under Bill s.1618, Title III, passed by the 105th U.S. Congress, mail cannot be considered spam if it bears a noncommmercial message, nor if it includes contact information and a link for removal from the underlying mailing list.
www.ConspiracyPenPal.com
|
|
|
|
|
|