The
Secret Origin of AIDS in America:
Facts, Fallacies and Conspiracy Theories
by Alan Cantwell, MD
In 2006 the AIDS epidemic will be a quarter-century old. Officially starting in June 1981 as a mysterious and fatal disease exclusively found in several dozen young white gay men from New York City and Los Angeles, the disease has now killed 20 million people with 40 million more currently infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), widely accepted as the sole cause of AIDS. One million Americans are now infected with HIV; and almost half of the new cases are African-American.
The disease was first uncovered in homosexual men from Manhattan. "Gay cancer," in the form of Kaposi's sarcoma skin tumors, was the most striking telltale sign; and drugs, promiscuity, and anal sex were all thought to play a role in the unprecedented suppression of the immune system. It was soon obvious that the disease was not limited to gays: the mysterious agent was in the national blood supply, and an epidemic of AIDS was also uncovered in Central Africa.
In April 1984 Robert Gallo of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) announced his discovery of HIV as the cause of AIDS. Subsequently, Luc Montagnier of the Pasteur Institute in Paris filed a lawsuit claiming he had first discovered the AIDS virus at Pasteur, and that Gallo had stolen the French virus after it was sent to his lab for study.Twenty-five
years later, the origin of AIDS still remains a mystery. The
disease is widely believed to have originated in Africa when
a primate (monkey) virus "jumped species" to first
infect Black Africans. However, it is important to note that
this belief is theory, not proven fact.
Montagnier
has wisely cautioned that it is extremely important to distinguish
between the ancestral origin of HIV and the actual beginning
of the AIDS epidemic. The animal virus ancestor of HIV may
indeed be centuries old, but it is obvious that the epidemic
itself is new.
The
epidemic did not begin in Africa. The first AIDS cases were
uncovered in Manhattan in 1979. At that time there were no
reported African cases. In fact, the AIDS epidemic in Africa
did not begin until the autumn of 1982 at the earliest.
How
was HIV introduced exclusively into the gay community in the
late 1970s? The exclusive introduction of HIV into the homosexual
population of New York City is an unprecedented event in the
history of medicine. This biologic phenomenon has never been
fully explained scientifically. There is certainly no evidence
to indicate white gay men were the only people exposed to
sexual contact with Africans, particularly at a time when
the epidemic did not exist in Africa. Furthermore, it is biologically
impossible for a purported sexually-transmitted and blood
borne "virus out of Africa" to infect only young,
white, healthy men in Manhattan! Yet, the impossible did happen.
Despite these facts, we are repeatedly told that AIDS began
in Africa, even though the American epidemic began before
the African epidemic.
The
mixing of AIDS facts and fallacies has long been apparent
to researchers like myself who are convinced that HIV
did not come from Mother Nature and "species jumping",
but was most likely introduced via contaminated vaccine
experiments exclusively targeting the Black African
and the American Gay community.
Before exploring the man-made theory of AIDS, it is important to note a small but highly vocal group who believes the cause of AIDS is still unknown, that the AIDS blood test is worthless, and that HIV is a harmless virus that is not sexually transmitted. This group, headed by retrovirologist Peter Duesberg and other well-credential scientific "dissidents", believes AIDS is a toxic and nutritional syndrome. They blame AIDS on recreational drug use among gays - and poverty and malnutrition in Africa for the disease.
As a medical
doctor and AIDS and cancer researcher, I am certainly
not in accord with this group, but they have been quite
successful politically, influencing world leaders like
President Thabo Mbeki of South Africa, much to the chagrin
of the World Health Organization. For more information,
go to www.google.com and type-in "VirusMyth" or "The Perth
Group".
In
1970 the discovery of a cell enzyme, called "reverse
transcriptase" by Howard Temin and David Baltimore, allowed
molecular biologists to detect so-called retroviruses in some
animal cancers. It was soon recognized that retroviruses could
be found normally in the genes of many animal cells, and that
scientists could manipulated these viruses to produce detrimental
effects on the immune system. In "species jumping"
laboratory experiments, many viruses were transferred between
different animal species and were also adapted to human cells.
As
part of President Richard Nixon's "War on Cancer, "
genetic engineering of viruses became an integral part of
the now largely forgotten Special Virus Cancer Program, conducted
under the auspices of the NCI. Nixon also transferred part
of the Army's biological warfare unit at Fort Detrick, Maryland,
over to the NCI, thereby allowing secret biowarfare experimentation
to be carried out under cover of bona fide cancer research.
All
this virus transfer and molecular manipulation was a
biologic disaster waiting to happen. What would happen
if one of these highly dangerous genetic creations escaped
from the laboratory into the public sector? This culminated
in a historic conference entitled "Biohazards in
Biological Research" held at Asilomar, near Pacific
Grove in California in 1973. Despite the biologic dangers,
it was decided to continue this research.
By the late-1970s the War against Cancer and the Virus Cancer Program proved a bust with no cancer-causing retroviruses found in humans. The Program was winding down in 1978, at the exact time when government scientists were also enrolling thousands of gay men in New York City to serve as guinea pigs in the hepatitis B experiment that took place that same year at the New York Blood Center in Manhattan. In 1979 the first cases of AIDS in gay men were reported from Manhattan. Coincidence? I think not.
Five
years later, Gallo, who had worked for the Virus Cancer
Program (VCP), "discovered" the retrovirus
that causes AIDS; and Duesberg, who also worked for
the VCP, continues to declare that HIV is harmless.
Is
there a connection between the laboratory manipulation
of primate retroviruses in the 1970s and the outbreak
of AIDS? Or did Mother Nature conveniently pick that
exact time to jump monkey genes into gay men to spectacularly
revive the science of retrovirology and the careers
of virologists like Gallo?
The Gay
Vaccine Experiment
The earliest AIDS cases in America can be clearly traced back
to the time period when the hepatitis B experiment began at
the New York Blood Center. The Center began injecting gay
men with multiple doses of the experimental vaccine in November
1978. The inoculations ended in October 1979, less than two
years before the official start of the epidemic. Most importantly,
the vaccine was developed in chimpanzees - the primate now
thought to contain the "ancestor" virus of HIV.
Also downplayed is the Center's pre-AIDS connection to primate
research in Africa and also to a primate center in the New
York City area. The final experimental vaccine was also made
by Merck and the NIH from the pooled serum specimens of countless
gay men who carried the hepatitis B virus in their blood.
The
New York Blood Center (NYBC) is the largest independent blood
supplier and distributor in the USA. In 1970, Alfred M Prince,
M.D., head of the NYBC Laboratory of Virology, began his hepatitis
research with chimps housed at LEMSIP (the Laboratory for
Experimental Medicine and Surgery) in downstate Tuxedo, NY.
Until disbanded in 1997, LEMSIP supplied New York area scientists
with primates and primate parts for transplantation and virus
research.
Founded
in 1965, LEMSIP was affiliated with New York University Medical
Center, where the first cases of AIDS-associated Kaposi's
sarcoma were discovered in 1979. NYU Medical Center researchers
were also heavily involved in the development of the experimental
hepatitis B vaccine, and the Center received government grants
and contracts connected with biological warfare research beginning
in 1969, according to Dr. Leonard Horowitz, author of Emerging
Viruses: AIDS and Ebola [1996].
In
1974 Prince, with the support of Aaron Kellner, President
of the NYBC, moved the chimp hepatitis research to a
new primate center called Vilab II in Robertsfield,
Liberia, in Africa. Chimps were captured from various
parts of West Africa and brought to VILAB. The lab also
prides itself by releasing "rehabilitated"
chimps back into the wild. One cannot help but wonder
if some of the purported "ancestors" of HIV
in the African bush have their origin in chimpanzees
held in African primate labs for vaccine and medical
experimentation.
The
hepatitis B experiment, which inoculated over 1,000
healthy gay men, was a huge success with 96% of the
men developing antibodies again the hepatitis virus.
This high rate of success could not have been achieved
if the men were immunosuppressed, because immunosuppressed
people do not easily form antibodies to the vaccine.
The experiment was followed by similar hepatitis B experiments
using gay men in Los Angeles, San Francisco, Chicago,
Denver and St. Louis, beginning in March 1980 and ending
in October 1981, the same year the epidemic became official.
In
the mid-1980s the many blood specimens donated by the
gay Manhattan men during the experiment were retrospectively
examined for HIV infection by researchers at the NYBC.
It was determined that 6% of the specimens donated between
1978-1979 were positive for HIV. By 1984 (the end of
the study period) over 40% of the men tested positive
for HIV.
The
final fate of all the men in the experiment has never been
revealed. However, the blood donated by these men are the
oldest HIV-positive blood tests on record in the United States.
The full story of this experiment and its aftermath are contained
in my two books on man-made AIDS: AIDS and the Doctors
of Death [1988], and Queer Blood [1993]. For
details, google: "gay hepatitis B experiment." One
fact is obvious: There was no AIDS in America until the exact
year the government began experimenting with gay men.
There
is also a suppressed connection between the outbreak of AIDS
in Africa and the widespread vaccine programs conducted by
the World Health Organization (WHO) in the 1970s in Central
Africa, particularly the smallpox eradication program. On
May 11, 1987, London Times science writer Pearce
Wright suggested the smallpox vaccine program could have awakened
a "dormant" AIDS virus infection in Africa. Gallo
was quoted as saying," The link between the WHO program
and the epidemic is an interesting and important hypothesis.
I cannot say that it actually happened, but I have been saying
for some years that the use of live vaccines, such as that
used for smallpox, can activate a dormant infection such as
HIV."
This explosive story linking AIDS to African vaccines was suppressed and never appeared in the controlled major American media. The genocidal and depopulation implications of this suppressed story can be found on the Internet by googling "WHO Murdered Africa", by William Campbell Douglas, M.D.
Vaccines,
Species Jumping, and HIV
There are inherent dangers in vaccine production because vaccines
are made on living cells. Contamination with bacteria and
viruses are constant problems during the manufacturing process.
Laboratory additives used to feed the cell cultures (such
as fetal bovine [cow] serum) may also be a source of microbial
contamination. Some researchers believe living and killed
viruses injected into the body can combine with other viruses
normally present in the body, resulting in disease-causing
"recombinants." Vaccines can also contain viral
particles, as well as newly recognized tiny bacteria known
as "nanobacteria." Half the 2004 flu vaccine supply
was destroyed due to contamination with disease-causing bacteria.
The dangers of vaccines are downplayed in an attempt to assure
the public that vaccines are safe.
We are repeatedly told that HIV is the first primate virus to "jump species" and produce an epidemic in humans. But, in truth, the AIDS epidemic is the second instance in which a monkey virus has been transferred to humans via vaccines.
Rarely-publicized
is the fact that a cancer-causing monkey virus jumped
species a half century ago when contaminated polio vaccines
were injected into millions of people, including half
the U.S. population of that era. In the early 1960s
it was discovered that some lots of polio vaccine manufactured
on rhesus monkey kidney cells during the period 1955
to 1963 were contaminated with a monkey virus called
SV40 (Simian virus #40). This primate virus was proven
to cause cancer in experimental animals. However, to
this day, health officials still insist there is no
proof that SV40 causes human cancer.
Despite
the lack of government interest, genetic and immunologic
studies of SV40 by independent researchers over the
past decade indicate this virus is clearly associated
with rapidly-fatal cancers of the lung (mesothelioma),
bone marrow cancer (multiple myeloma), brain tumors
in children, and other forms of cancer.
A Washington
Times report (September 21, 2003) states, "Some
of the polio vaccine given to millions of American children
from 1962 until 2000 could have been contaminated with a monkey
virus that shows up in some cancers, according to documents
and testimony to be delivered to a House committee Wednesday.
The vaccine manufacturer said such claims 'don't have any
validity,' and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
(CDC) agrees." (See the website: www.sv40cancer.com)
For anyone who still believes vaccine makers and health officials always act in your best interest, I would highly recommend a recently published book titled The Virus and the Vaccine: The True Story of a Cancer-Causing Monkey Virus, Contaminated Polio Vaccine, and the Millions of Americans Exposed, by Debbie Bookchin and Jim Schumacher.
Medical
Experimentation and Bio Warfare
The idea of man-made AIDS is often considered a paranoid belief.
Why would scientists introduce a virus to kill millions of
people? AIDS experts routinely blame primates and human sexuality
for the origin and spread of HIV, but they never consider
the possibility that HIV could have originated in an animal
cancer virus laboratory.
The
sad truth is that governments and the military do indeed experiment
on unsuspecting citizens. (Google: secret medical experimentation)
And Iraqi bioweapons of mass destruction was one of the reasons
used to justify the current invasion of Iraq.
It
is clear that AIDS started as a "gay disease." However,
yet another downplayed fact is that the HIV "strain"
in America is different from the HIV strains found in Africa.
Harvard virologist Max Essex claims the American HIV strain spreads more easily via anal sex; whereas the African strains spread more efficiently via vaginal sex. (Google: Max Essex + HIV strain) This could explain why the American epidemic spreads primarily through homosexual activity and anal sex , while in Africa it is primarily heterosexual and spreads through vaginal sex. The "different" HIV strain in America is further evidence that "American AIDS" did not originate in Africa.
The Relationship between AIDS and CancerThe
purpose of the Virus Cancer Program was two-fold. First, to
discover a virus in humans that could cause a form of cancer.
Second, to develop immunosuppressive laboratory viruses useful
in "making" cancer in experimental animals.
When Gallo discovered HIV in 1984, he called it a cancer-causing "leukemia/lymphoma" virus. The name was quickly changed to a "lymphotropic" virus, thus obscuring the relationship between the new "gay disease" and cancer. Virologists were quickly convinced that the virus came from primates, and both Gallo and Essex heavily promoted the readily accepted African green monkey origin of HIV. A decade later, chimpanzees (rather than monkeys) became the more favored origin. The primate origin of HIV was further obscured by titling the virus as a "human immunodeficiency virus" (HIV) , rather than calling it "primate immunodeficiency virus" (or PIV) in humans.
Is HIV the sole cause of AIDS?In 1994 it was reported that KS is actually caused by a new "herpes-8" virus. KS cases were first discovered in the late nineteenth century; and before AIDS it was a rare form of cancer. Before AIDS, KS was a non-transmissible disease that was never seen in young American men. The finding of a new KS virus indicates that two different viruses were simultaneously introduced into gay men when AIDS began in the late 1970s. No rational explanation has been put forth for this bizarre occurrence; and how this "new" virus could cause a gay epidemic of KS has never been explained satisfactorily. Further complicating the "sole cause" of AIDS scenario is the recent discovery of tiny bacterial forms known as "mycoplasma." Luc Montagnier believes these microbes are important infectious "co-factors" in the development of AIDS, although most AIDS researchers ignore mycoplasma.
The "Cancer
Microbe" link to AIDS
Although
the precise cause of cancer is unknown, there is a century
of microbial research linking certain tuberculosis-like bacteria
to cancer. This research is ignored as medical heresy, but
my own reported cancer studies indicate that "acid-fast"
bacteria indeed exist in common forms of cancer and in Kaposi's
sarcoma. (Google: alan cantwell + Kaposi's sarcoma)
I have written extensively about these bacteria in, AIDS; The Mystery & the Solution(1984), The Cancer Microbe (1990), and Four Women Against Cancer (2005). Cancer bacteria have characteristics of both bacteria and viruses. There are also similarities to mycoplasma and to newly-discovered nanobacteria, currently considered to be the smallest forms of life and known to contaminate commercial vaccines. Nanobacteria are ubiquitous and may be involved in the pathology of many diseases currently considered of unknown cause.
Cancer microbe
research has been ignored in AIDS and KS. However, Lawrence
Broxmeyer, M.D., in AIDS: What the Discoverers of
HIV Never Admitted (2003), concludes that the real
cause of AIDS is not HIV, but actually tuberculosis-like
bacteria. He thinks Gallo and Montagnier found a retrovirus
because that was the only thing they were looking for.
Unlike Broxmeyer, I believe HIV came out of animal cancer research and dangerous vaccine and biological warfare experimentation - and that HIV made its way into vaccines injected into African Blacks and American Gays. If unrecognized cancer microbes are proven to be an unrecognized infectious factor in cancer and AIDS, as I believe they are, this would certainly add to the dangers of genetic engineering of cancer viruses and new bio-warfare agents.
I believe HIV is essential to produce the immunodeficiency characteristic of AIDS, but I consider HIV plus unrecognized "cancer bacteria" to be the causes of AIDS.The
Origin of Gallo's HIV virus
Could HIV be related to reported virus-like forms of cancer
bacteria? A careful reading of how Gallo "isolated"
HIV indicates possible derivation from cancerous cells harboring
unrecognized bacteria.
According to Crewdson, HIV was finally isolated in Gallo's lab by isolating the virus in pooled blood T-cells from ten patients with AIDS. From that brew, the virus was cultured in larger amounts for commercial purposes by growing HIV on "cell lines" derived from the white blood cells (T-cells) of patients with lymphoma cancer. This particular strain of HIV became the basis for Gallo's patented HIV blood test and the resulting lawsuit.
Montagnier
claimed that he first discovered HIV at Pasteur and when he
sent the virus to Gallo's lab for testing, he believes Gallo
stole the virus and made it his own discovery. Gallo repeatedly
declared his virus was not the French virus.
It
was eventually proven that Montagnier's virus somehow made
its way into Gallo's HIV culture. Just as everyone's fingerprints
are different, so too is every HIV virus. Gallo's virus was
molecularly identical to Montagnier's in every respect. With
the intervention of President Ronald Reagan and the French
Premier, the lawsuit was settled out of court in 1987, with
the two researchers agreeing to split the royalties from the
AIDS blood test.
Despite all this, the scientific controversy continued, resulting in additional investigations by the National Academy of Sciences and the NIH Office of Scientific Integrity. In 1991, Gallo finally conceded that Montagnier's virus had most likely contaminated his laboratory and that his AIDS patented blood test was indeed based on the Pasteur virus. In 1992, the National Academy of Sciences' panel completed its investigation, producing a report critical of Gallo.
All these scientific
irregularities surrounding the precise lab origin of HIV point
to serious problems in virology. For example, for several years
Gallo was unable or unwilling to admit his virus was identical
to Montagnier's virus, even though they proved to as identical
as any two HIV virus strains could be. Furthermore, the controversy
proves how easily virus laboratories can be contaminated by
"outside" viruses.
One of the contentions of the man-made theory of AIDS is that the experimental hepatitis B vaccine was contaminated with an immunosuppressive AIDS-causing agent and/or the Kaposi's sarcoma virus. This theory is condemned as conspiracy theory. Certainly the vaccine was unlike any other in that it was made from the blood of gay men who were hepatitis B virus carriers. During the gay experiment at the NYBC there was concern that something was wrong with the vaccine and that it might be contaminated. According to June Goodfield's Quest for the Killers, p 86, "This was no theoretical fear, contamination having been suspected in one batch made by the National Institutes of Health, though never in Merck's."
Four years
before AIDS in 1975, Gallo also reported a "human
virus" (HL-23) that subsequently proved to be three
contaminating laboratory cancer-causing primate viruses
(gibbon ape virus, simian sarcoma virus, and baboon
endogenous virus). Gallo claims he has no idea how these
animal viruses contaminated his lab. In 1986 Essex also
reported a "new AIDS virus" that eventually
turned out to be a monkey virus traced back to his own
lab. Despite these contaminations, Gallo and Essex both
blamed AIDS on monkeys in the jungle and heavily promoted
the "out of Africa" origin of American AIDS.
After AIDS began
there were instances where a strain of HIV isolated from a
particular AIDS patient inadvertently contaminated HIV specimens
from other AIDS patients - and where HIV strains sent to other
laboratories accidentally contaminated additional specimens.
Is
AIDS Genocide against Gays and Blacks?
Why is there a blackout of the man-made theory of AIDS in
the scientific literature and in the corporate-controlled
media? Although some evidence is presented here, it is a fraction
of the documentation presented in my two books on the man-made
epidemic, and in books by Dr. Leonard Horowitz, and Professor
Robert E Lee, and in Dr. Robert Strecker's video "The
Strecker Memorandum", and in other sources. (Google,
"man-made origin of AIDS" for 445 citations.)
I
do not believe the exclusive introduction of HIV into the
most hated minority in America was caused by monkeys in the
African bush, particularly when AIDS appeared immediately
after the gay experiment. Why are primates in the African
wild blamed when tens of thousands of captive primates in
virus labs all over the world have been injected with infectious
viruses and cancerous tissue for more than a century.
Why
were African Blacks targeted? Many Africans and African-Americans
believe AIDS is an experiment to rid the world of Black people,
as part of a government-sanctioned world depopulation program.
American
gays were the perfect target to test a new retrovirus. A largely
homophobic public would easily accept HIV infection in gays,
due to their purported promiscuity and drug use. Few people
would believe the U.S. government would secretly test biologic
agents on its civilians, although there is a well-documented
history of secret unethical experimentation extending back
to the Cold War of the 1950s which includes the government's
horrendous "radiation experiments."
I
cannot explain the silence and apathy on these issues from
the Black and the Gay communities. People don't seem to care
much about genocide unless their own group is affected; and
even so, most people are in denial and don't want to know
about man-made AIDS. Many AIDS activists simply dismiss the
man-made theory as a "distraction" which interferes
with HIV testing and treatment, and the search for a cure.
The
Secret History of AIDS
The
history of AIDS has been deliberately white-washed to obscure
its man-made origin. Knowledge of HIV and other retroviruses
came directly out of the little-known and secret Special Virus
Cancer Program of the 1970s. More than one virus was introduced
into American gays in the late 1970s, and mycoplasma and "cancer
bacteria" are additional infectious agents that have
been ignored in proclaiming HIV as the "sole cause of
AIDS."
Secret
bio-warfare research co-mingled with bona fide cancer research
at the NCI in the decade before AIDS, and that association
continues up to the present time. AIDS in America erupted
when government researchers began experimenting with gays,
using an experimental vaccine developed in primates - the
animals purported to contain the "ancestor virus"
of HIV. AIDS in America did not come from Africa. HIV occurred
exclusively in the gay community because the virus was put
there by the "hand of man."
The man-made theory of AIDS is not based on conspiracy theory. The theory warrants a full scientific investigation - and the secret history of HIV and AIDS needs to come out of the closet. P
®2005 Alan Cantwell, MD, writes frequently about the origin
of AIDS and cancer. He is the author of AIDS and the Doctors
of Death, Queer Blood, The Cancer Microbe,
and a new 2005 book, Four Women Against Cancer, all
published by Aries Rising Press, PO Box 29532, Los Angeles,
CA 90029. www.ariesrisingpress.com Email: alancantwell@sbcglobal.net.
|