From barr@euclid.colorado.edu Mon Jan 20 15:47:33 1997
Newsgroups: alt.mindcontrol
Subject: Mindcontrol Tools
From: barr@euclid.colorado.edu (b)
Date: 20 Jan 1997 15:47:33 GMT

There has been much discussion of "Microwave Hearing" phenomenon on the net
I was intrigued by this and have done some research. It turns out that 
microwave hearing does indeed exist. There is a fair sized body of research
available on the subject. This is one of the more complete reviews of the
subject. The entire article is long, and I am not going to post it all.
But I will review it.

The name of the Article is:
Auditory Perception of radio-frequency Electromagnetic Fields

It appeared in:
The Journal of Acoustical Society of America 1982 pages 1321-1334.

It was written by:
Chung-Kwang Chou and Arthur W. Guy
The above authors were Phd Researchers at the University of Washington as of
the publication date of this article.

This research was funded by:
Office of Naval Intellegence, National Institute of Handicapped Research, and
Department of Education with a special thanks to Richard M. White of University
of California, Berkeley.

INTRODUCTION
Pulsed microwaves have been heard as sound by radar operators since radar was
invented during World War II. ...

The earliest report we have found on the auditory perception of pulsed micro-
wave appeared in 1956 as an advertisement of the Airborne Instruments Lab in  
Proceedings of the IRE. The advertisement described observations made in 1947
on the hearing of sounds that occurred at the repetion rate of a radar while
the listener stood close to a horn antenna. When the observers first told their
coworkers in the Lab of their hearing experiences, they encountered skepticism
and RATHER POINTED QUESTIONS ABOUT THEIR MENTAL HEALTH. (emphasis this author)

...

POWER LEVELS and FREQUENCY RANGE
At very low frequency range (< 1MHz), a human-size biological object absorbs
very little radio-frequency energy; however, the absorption can be appreciable 
at the resonant frequency near 70-80 MHz (where the long dimension of the
body is approximately 0.4 wavelengths) (Durney etal. 1978). For a human head, 
the resonant frequency is near 600 Mhz....Although there is universal agreement
on the thermal effects of the highlevel (> 100 milliWatts/centimeter(squared))
radio-frequency electromagnetic radiation, there is considerable debate on the
biological effects of low-level (< 100mWatts/cm2) electromagnetic radiation.
...
The thresholds (for hearing ed) of average power density of fields at the head
were determined to be 0.4 and 2mW/cm2, respectively for the two transmitters.
...
In another experiment they used a 2450MHz pulse generator with pulses in the 
0.5 to 32 microsecond width. The generator produced peak power of 10kW.
Calculations indicated that the maximum amount of absorbed energy was 
16 microJOULES/gram (They are talking microjoules per gram now instead of
milliwatts per cm squared. They use microjoules when they talk of absorbed
energy and milliwatts when talking about radiated wattage. The two are related
of course, but the energy absorbed depends on the makeup of the human head,
whereas the energy radiated is dependent on the transmission power). (ED)
...
In another experiment thay used  5 to 15 microsecond pulses at 3 Ghz frequency.

DISCUSSION
The microwave-induced auditory phenomenon is an example of a microwave-
biological interaction that has been WELL QUANTIFIED and has been WIDELY
ACCEPTED (emphasis this author) as a bonafide "weak-field" effect. Although
originally the hypothesis of a dirct nervous system stimulation was proposed,
the evidence is now strongly convincing that the hearing phenomenon is related
thermoelastically induced mechanical vibration. The same type of vibration can 
be produced by other means, e.g. by a laser pulse, or by activating a 
piezoelectric crystal in contact with the skull (Hmm, implants? ed.).

...

The paper ends with about a page of references to other works, one of 
which is Frey's paper published in 1963.

So there you have it folks, Microwave hearing is fact, not fiction.


From barr@euclid.colorado.edu Mon Jan 20 15:48:29 1997
Newsgroups: alt.mindcontrol
Subject: Mindcontrol Tools
From: barr@euclid.colorado.edu (b)
Date: 20 Jan 1997 15:48:29 GMT

The following is a bibliography of research available on Microwave Hearing.
The first article is a very good review of what was known as of 1982.
This bibliography was obtained from the first article so all articles are
1982 or earlier.

Journal Acoustical Society of America, June 1982 pages 1321-1334
"Auditory perception of radio-frequency electromagnetic fields" Chung-Kwang Chou
and Arthur W. Guy

Journal of Applied Physiology 17(4): pages 689-692. 1962
"Human Auditory System Response To Modulated Electromagnetic Energy" Frey,Allan

Airborne Instruments Lab (1956).Proceedings of the IRE October 1956
"An Observation on the Detection by the Ear of Microwave Signals"

Cain,C.A. And Rissman, W.J. (1978) "Mammalian Auditory Response to 3.0 GHz
Microwave Pulses," IEEE Trans Biomed. Eng. 25, 288-293

Chou, C.K. (1975). "Effects of Electromagnetic Fields on the Nervous System"
Phd dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle WA

Chou, C.K. Galambos, R. Guy, A.W. and Lovely, R.H. (1975) "Cochlear Microphonics
Generated by Microwave Pulses" Journal Microwave Power 10(4), 361-367

Chou, C.K., Guy, A.W., and Galambos, R. (1976) "Microwave-Induced Auditory
Response: Cochlear Microphonics" Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Waves,
Vol. I, HEW Publication, FDA 77-8010) pp 89-103

Chou, C. K., Guy A. W., and Galambos, R. (1976b). "Microwave-Induced Cochlear
Microphonics in Cats," Journal Microwave Power 11(2), 171-173

Chou, C. K., Guy A. W., and galambos, R. (1977). "Characteristics of Microwave
Induced Microphonics," Radio Sci. 12(6S), 221-227

Chou, C. K., and Galambos, R (1979). "Middle-Ear Structures Contribute Little
to Auditory Perception of Microwaves" Journal of Microwave Power (1974) 14(4)
pages 321-326

Chou, C. K., and Guy, A.W. (1979a) "Carbon-Loaded Teflon Electrodes for Chronic
EEG Recordings in Microwave Research" Journal of Microwave Power, p 399-404

Chou, C. K., and Guy, A.W. (1979b) "Microwave-Induced Auditory Responses in
Guinea Pigs: Relationship of Threshold and Microwave-Pulse Duration" Radio
Science 14(6s), pages 193-197

Chou, C. K., Guy, A.W. Foster K.R. Galambos, R. and Justesen D.R. (1980)
"Holographic Assesment of Microwave Hearing" Science 209, p 1143-1144

Durney, C.H. Johnson, C.C. Barber P.W. Massoudi, H. Iskander, M.F. Lords
J.L. Ryser, K.K. Allen, S.J. and Mitchell, J.C. (1978) "Radiofrequency
Radiation Dosimetry Handbook" Rep. SAM-TR-78-22, USAF School on Aerospace 
Medicine, Brooks AFB, Texas 78235

Flottorp, G. (1976). "Studies on the Mechanisms of the Electrophonic Effect"
Acta Oto-Laryngol Suppl. 341, 5-71



From barr@euclid.colorado.edu Mon Jan 20 15:49:24 1997
Newsgroups: alt.mindcontrol
Subject: Mindcontrol Tools
From: barr@euclid.colorado.edu (b)
Date: 20 Jan 1997 15:49:24 GMT

At first one might be tempted to lump this sort of thing with "time machines"
or "anti-gravity" devices. However, no fundamental laws of Physics are broken
by this technology. So read on..


  SYNTHETIC TELEPATHY or "Did you know you can hear Microwaves?"
                          
                          by Judy Wall

BACKGROUND

   Synthetic telepathy is a term used to describe the beaming of
words, thoughts, or ideas into a person's mind by mechanical
means, specifically, some type of electromagnetic transmitter,
similar to a radio or television broadcast, operating in the
microwave frequency band.

   Humans have been hearing voices in their heads since the
beginning of time.  Everyone hears their own voice, of course, in
everyday thought patterns.  We hear other people's voices in our
imagination and in our dreams.  But to hear voices originating
from outside the head when there is no other person present is to
cause a dilemma.  Is it our imagination? Is it the wind or some
other natural sound that we are misinterpreting? (The calls of
many animals can sound amazingly human-like.  Bird calls, such as
that made by a peacock can sound like a human in distress.  Some
sound like the wail of a baby.)

   But suppose the sound heard is definitely a human speech
pattern?  The Bible records the story of young Samuel, under the
tutelage of Eli.  One night Samuel is awakened from his sleep by a
voice calling his name.  He runs to Eli, saying, "Here I am."  The
priest dismisses the boy.  It happens again.  It happens a third
time.  This time Eli says to Samuel, "Go lie down; and it shall
be, if he call thee, that thou shalt say, Speak Lord, for thy
servant heareth."  The voice called to Samuel again, and he
answered as he had been directed.  And the Lord spoke to Samuel.

   This is not the only case recorded.  The Bible is replete with
accounts of humans hearing and responding to voices in the air.
But identifying the source of the voice is of major importance.
Is it the voice of God, and angel, a devil, an animal (recall the
story of Balaam being rebuked by his ass), or other humans
playing tricks on that person?

   Persons who claim regularly to communicate with unseen beings
have been treated as saints and seers to be revered; witches or
warlocks to be burnt at the stake; or just plain crazy to be
ignored, locked up, or perhaps subjected to electroshock therapy,
a kind of torture used to convince the patient that it is better
to discontinue such claims.  The latter attitude is the one
currently held by medical authorities in today's world.

ENTER THE DRAGON: THE HIGH SOPHISTICATION OF MODERN ELECTRONICS
TECHNOLOGY

   The first, and perhaps only, officially reported scientific
experiment documenting a case of synthetic telepathy - the one
that everyone makes reference to - cannot be found in the
literature.  Here's what happened.

   In 1961 Allen Frey, a free-lance biophysicist and engineering
psychologist, reported that human can hear microwaves (1).  This 
discovery was dismissed by most United States scientists as
being the result of artifact (outside noise).  In 1976 the Defense
Intelligence Agency attributed the discovery to Soviet
researchers.  (See Keeler article, Resonance #23, page 7 under
"Disinformation".)

   The more technical description of the experiment is described
by James C. Linn (2). "Frey...found that human subjects exposed
to 1310 MHz and 2982 MHz microwaves at average power densities of
0.4 to 2 mW/cm2 perceived auditory sensations described as
buzzing or knocking sounds."  (also described as clicks or
chirps.)  "The peak power densities were on the order of 200 to
300 mW/cm2 and the pulse repetition frequencies varied from 200
to 400 Hz...Frey referred to this auditory phenomenon as the RF
(radio frequency) sound.  The sensation occurred instantaneously
at average incident power densities well below that necessary for
known biological damage and appeared to originate from within or
near the back of the head."

   Further testing revealed that two requirements were necessary
for the subject to hear the microwave induced sound: good bone
conduction and the ability to hear acoustic energy above 5
kHz..."  Don Justesen (3) reports that there is a sizeable
minority of people, including himself, who cannot hear microwaves
under direct radiation. Lin also noted, "Additional data
indicated that perception of microwave induced sound was
primarily a function of the peak power density and secondarily
dependent on pulse width." 

   Skeptics were finally convinced by a study of behavioral
sensitivity to low-level microwave radiation in rats by Nancy
King in 1971. (4)

   By 1975 the introduction to a paper by A.W. Guy and others
begins "One of the most widely observed and accepted biologic
effects of low average power electromagnetic (EM) energy is the
auditory sensation evoked in man when exposed to pulsed
microwaves." (5)

   That paper's aim was to determine the threshold of the sound-
inducing phenomenon as 1) a function of pulse power or energy,
pulse shape, and carrier frequency 2) the locus of the action,
that is, whether it is initiated at a central or peripheral site,
and 3) whether it is caused by direct action of the EM field on
the nervous system or if it activates the auditory system (the
ear and related parts that normally conduct sound to the brain).

   After a battery of tests the following conclusions were made:

          *  the threshold for microwave pulse-evoked auditory
sensations or responses in both humans and cats is related to the
incident energy per pulse, with values of approximately 20 uJ/cm2
for cats to 40 uJ/cm2 for humans for pulses less than 30 usec
wide, 

          *  the microwaves seem to interact more with the high-
frequency portion of the auditory system,

          *  cochlear destruction resulted in total loss of all
evoked potentials due to microwave and acoustic stimuli,
indicating the microwave auditory effect is exerted in the same
manner as conventional acoustic stimuli,

          *  the most likely mechanism of EM field interaction
appears to be conversion of EM energy to acoustic energy due to
thermal expansion,

          *  a prerequisite for interaction with the material is
that the conductivity be sufficiently high and the frequency
proper to permit a penetration of energy and loss over an
appreciable fraction of the volume when the object is exposed to
a microwave pulse.

   Another study conducted by C.K. Chou and others (6)
investigated the possibility of the acoustic systems as the site
of interaction between electromagnetic waves and biological
tissue in producing the microwave hearing phenomenon.
Demonstration of microwave- induced cochlear microphonics (the
mechanical movement of cochlear hair cells) in laboratory animals
confirmed this.

   But scientists wanted to know exactly HOW the microwaves
induced the reaction.  Guy and others showed that at frequencies
where the auditory effect can easily be detected, microwaves
penetrate deeply into the tissues of the head.  Absorbed energy
causes rapid thermal expansion (at the microscopic level) which
produces strains in the tissue.  This produces an acoustic stress
wave that is conducted through the bone to the cochlea.  From
there it proceeds in the same manner as in conventional hearing.

   Simple or slow heating of the tissue by microwaves does not
give rise to the auditory effect.  Only microwaves that have a
short rise time, that is, square waves that cause a rapid rise in
the microenvironment's temperature will produce the stress wave.

   Several other mechanisms to describe this EM-biological
interaction have been advanced, but the above theory, called the
thermoelastic theory, is thought to be the most probable because
calculations for acoustic pressure are much higher for this
method than for the others.  Do you really want me to describe the
other theories too? No, I didn't think so.

WHERE DOES SYNTHETIC TELEPATHY FIT IN?

   Justesen reports that A.W. Guy had his father, a skilled
telegrapher, send messages in Morse code via the microwave
auditory method.  This might be useful in certain situations.
Still, it is a far cry from "hearing voices".

   The credit for performing an actual experiment in which
audible voices were communicated via microwaves is given to
Joseph Sharp and Mark Grove.  Justesen reports that they recorded
on tape the spoken words for the single syllable numbers one
through ten.  "The electrical sine wave analogs of each word was
then processed so that each time a sine wave crossed zero
reference in the negative direction, a brief pulse of microwave
energy was triggered.  By radiating themselves with these
voice-modulated microwaves, Sharp and Grove were readily able to
hear, identify, and distinguish among the nine words.  The sounds
heard were not unlike those emitted by persons with artificial
larynxes.  Communication of more complex words and of sentences
was not attempted because the averaged densities of energy
required would approach the current 10 mW/cm2 limit of safe
exposure."

   The 1976 Defense Intelligence Agency report mentioned
previously (under Keeler, "Disinformation") also credited the
Soviet scientists with making the Sharp-Grove discovery.  Keeler
says that this item "found its way into at least one
Congressional report and was printed in a number of newspapers
and professional journals".  Motivation for such a disinformation
campaign was to coerce Congress and the American public into
authorizing and allocating money for projects to "catch up" with
the Russians.

   References in the literature citing Sharp and Grove refer to a
paper, "Generation of Acoustic Signals by Pulsed Microwave
Energy" (7) that, from the title, would indicate that this is the
above mentioned classic experiment.  But it is not.  It is 
apparently a next-step type experiment, in which sounds are 
generated by microwave pulses when aimed at absorbers 
(carbon-impregnated polyurethane microwave absorbers, and 
aluminum foil is used).  They do not make reference in this paper 
to the above experiment, not even citing it in their references, 
as would be usual in referring to a previous work.

   Why, we might ask, did they NOT publish such a startling
discovery? How did Justesen come by the information to relate it
in his paper? Is it a reliable piece of information?

   Justesen references it in his notes as received by "personal
communication, September 28, 1973".

  The answer to the question, why did they NOT publish their
discovery, is contained within Justesen's paper, although in
an oblique way.  Remember that after the U.S. discovered the
microwave beam directed at the American embassy in Moscow, Milton
Zaret was brought in to evaluate the situation.  But, Justesen
says about the incident, "American intelligence agents were
understandably curious, but they did not want their Soviet
counterparts to know that the microwave bombardment had been
detected.  Enter the Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA), an
arm of the Executive Office that specializes in getting fast
answers to far-out questions that may bear on national security.
Agents for ARPA contacted Joseph C. Sharp, former director of
research in experimental psychology at the Walter Reed Army
Institute of Research, and an electronic engineer, Mark Grove,
who began to put together at Walter Reed what is now one of the
best equipped laboratories in the United States for studying
biopsychological effects of microwave radiations."

   Sharp and Grove were in the employ of the U.S. Government,
which undoubtably told them to keep their mouths shut about the
experiment.  But, perhaps they had already communicated their
findings to Justesen before the order to be quiet.  Justesen
merely calls his source a "personal communication".  That could
mean verbal or written.  It is my guess that it was a written (or
possibly tape-recorded) message that the two could not later deny
having made (as in the case of Dr. Narut, who was forced to
recant his remarks that the U.S. Navy was conditioning men to
become assassins).  At any rate, Justesen, published the incident,
and it is repeated in Lin's book.  (Some cite Lin as the
reference.)

   Lin discusses three potential medical applications of the
microwave-induced hearing phenomenon (including use of the more
mundane examples of clicks, chirps, and buzzes, not just the
exotic "voice communication"):

          *  one is for distinguishing in cases of hearing loss
between types of deafness, whether air or bone conduction.

          *  another is for eliciting sensory evoked potentials.
He cites work by Rapin (8) in detecting residual hearing in
multiply-handicapped infants, and the prescribing of hearing aids
for them when they might have been assumed to be completely deaf.

          *  In the same category, Sohmer (9) used this method to
locate tumors which exert pressure on or near the junction of the
auditory nerve and the brain stem.
   
          *  the last being the application of transmitted
digital codes or use of the Sharp-Grove experimental discovery in
communications.  He adds, "The capability of communicating
directly with humans by pulsed microwaves is obviously not
limited to the field of therapeutic medicine."  Perhaps he had
already heard of the government's interest in developing this
discovery.  The question is, Why HAVEN'T we heard of research
in this area, research with bona-fide medical applications?

SOME POSSIBLE CLINICAL PROCEDURES FOR EVALUATING CASES OF CLAIMED
SYNTHETIC TELEPATHY

   There is a common cry among people who claim to be victims of
government conducted "mind control" operations - that no one will
believe them, that there is no way to prove the voices they hear
come from the outside.

   Groups which are organized to be victim's advocates need a way
to sort out the victims of genuine mind control experiments from
others who claim to be harassed, but who, in fact, may be victims
merely of their own distorted personalities (paranoia,
schizophrenia, whatever).  Perhaps only one in ten of claimed
government harassment victims is truly such; perhaps only one in
fifty, or one in a hundred.  Who knows? But if only a single claim
be true, it needs to be documented.

   Not only is it important to sort out the "true victims" from
others for the sake of evaluating and combatting the situation,
it is necessary to be able to provide objective proof of the fact
to third parties in order to elicit help, awareness of the
problem, and legislative action against it.

   The above reported research offers some options along these
lines.  I respectfully submit the following measures be used in
evaluation and identifying causes of illegal mind control
experiments and harassment:

          1. Victim's advocate groups should hire a medical
doctor or scientist sympathetic to the cause to evaluate cases.
Individuals claiming abuse should be referred to this person.

          2. How does the victim describe the voice he/she hears?
 Is it like the artificial voice described in the Sharp and Grove
experiment? An indication that there is an unreal or unnatural
sound connected to the voice would be a very strong response to
indicate an artificial mechanism involved.

   Of course, there will be those who say, "It sounds like a
normal voice," or "It sounds like my own thoughts, but I know it
isn't.  Isn't it possible that advances have been made in the
past twenty years to update the technology to make it sound more
like a normal, human voice?"  Yes, of course, it is possible.
Still, a computer- like voice would certainly put an evil or
fearful connotation to the thought messages.  But the government
may have decided to try to simulate more natural sounds, for its
own purposes.  Whether they would be successful is unknown.  Don't
forget, that for most practical purposes, a specific word message
is unnecessary.  The easier-to-achieve objective of manipulating
EMOTIONS (feelings of fear or panic) or PHYSICAL BODY FUNCTIONS
(nausea, diarrhea weakness, headache) could very well serve their
purposes in the majority of cases, especially crowd control.

          3. The sensory evoked potential test is a strong
candidate for absolute proof/disproof of a claim.  (Refer to the
Rapin work above.)  A victim may not be hearing clicks or buzzes,
but if he is hearing a voice, noises, ANYTHING AT ALL, it will
automatically evoke a neurological response that CAN be detected
and CANNOT be bypassed.  If someone is hearing microwave induced
sounds or voices, it WILL show up on this EEG test.

   One may protest that the Voices can hear and see what is
happening; that they are aware of the subject's behavior and
conversations, and consequently will cease whenever someone tries
to detect them.  I doubt that they can see what is happening at
all times; an electronic camera/eye might be installed in his
house or on the car, but hardly on his person.  Or perhaps the
victim only is harassed while at home, the microwave being beamed
at his house.  Therefore, testing in an office or hospital
setting would show no unusual results.  (This situation is common
to many ailments.  Two options are available here.  Set up a stress
test to induce the condition, or take the test equipment on site
when the problem occurs.  The second option is the one that could
be used here.)  There are portable electroencephalograph (EEG)
machines.

          (a)  The above objection could be overcome by arranging
for "house calls".  The doctor could have a system worked out for
situations of this type.  The office visit might include a moment
when the doctor excuses himself for some reason, hands the victim
a paper with the words DO NOT READ ALOUD, DO NOT DISCUSS THIS
WITH ANYONE, NOT EVEN THE DOCTOR OR ASSISTANTS.  The paper would
include instructions as to how to secretly contact the doctor
when the voices are strong in order that an EEG recording might
be taken at the victim's house.

          (b)  Or the Victim might be fitted with a telemetry
apparatus to relay the EEG recordings via radio transmission back
to the clinic.

   Cesar Caceres (10) describes several such medical telemetry
devices.  The first transmission of heart sounds was accomplished
in 1921 by the U.S. Army Signal Corps from ships to shore.

   C.C. Breaksell and C.S. Parker in England, 1949, used
frequency modulation (FM) for the radio transmission of a human
electroencephalogram (EEG) (11).

   Although the EEG is usually described as more difficult to
record than the electrocardiogram (ECG or EKG) due to its lower
voltage output, thereby necessitating more sensitive
instrumentation and greater amplification, its transmission in
the form of radio waves is apparently simpler.  "H.W. Shipton (12)
described a system that had a frequency response of 2 to 100 cps.
 Although this is not sufficient to transmit the clinical ECG
which requires equipment with a frequency response to DC (0 cps),
the system was satisfactory for such phenomenon as the EEG.  It
used a transmitter fashioned after the design of Thomas and Klein
in their article, "How to Construct a Miniature FM Transmitter"
(13).  The receiver could be any domestic commercial set..."

   Readers might find a more recent article in the February
Popular Electronics, "Build an FM Stereo Transmitter" easier to
obtain.  This Fred Blechman article (14) refers to a kit offered
by Ramsey Electronics and is obtainable for a cost of about $55.
Easy to build, it is designed for amateur or advanced electronics
enthusiasts.  (I have one.)  

   "A. Kemp and W. Storm van Leeuwen developed a two-channel EEG
radiotelemetry system which has been the basis for development
work by others.  Instead of FM, it uses a different system of
coding the signal, PWM."(16)   

   The need for radiotelemetry of ECGs during exercise inspired
N.J. Holter in 1957 to design an elaborate system.  His 80 pound
transmitter was strapped to the subject's back (enough to cause
stress right there!).  He later developed a tiny transmitter that
the patient could carry in his pocket.  (The Ramsey transmitter,
mentioned above, is 5" X 5" X 1" and weighs less than one pound.)
 The patient's ECG was transmitted to a nearby briefcase that
contained a receiver and a tape recorder.  The tape could be read
later.  Holter also developed a method for rapidly scanning
several hours of tape-recorded tracings.  The tape could be played
to an oscilloscope or paper write-out.  If adapted for a simple
single or dual channel EEG, this would be an ideal set-up for a
Victim to use in recording auditory evoked potentials induced
during sessions of mind control "voice" harassments.

   These systems were designed mainly for short distance
telemetry, perhaps within a thousand yards of the transmitter.
But long distance telemetry devices have been developed as well,
even to the point of transmitting to Earth from space.  This was
first recorded in 1958 by A.G. Kousnetzow (17).

   In all of these examples, the transmitter would be fixed or
attached to the subject's scalp.  But there is another method for
placement of the electrodes: intracerebral, that is, the
electrodes are embedded within the skull.  This system is reported
by Jose Delgado (18).  He follows the method of Mark and Ervin
(19), and incidentally, one of the patients monitored was "L.K.,
a 35 year old white male design engineer..."  Non other than
Leonard Kille, and you know how he felt about this method of
brain monitoring.  (See Resonance #27, p.13-17, "Terminal Man" by
Paul Bartch.)  Best we should pass up this method.

   Undoubtedly there have been many advances made in perfecting
the radio-frequency systems.  The references used here are given
so that you can see how they developed and the fact that they
evolved from simple, basic circuits to more advanced technology
(present systems use computers to help read the results).

          4. Victim claims he has a receiver implanted in his
body.  Conventional X-rays should detect any metal parts.  If
negative, the CAT SCAN or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) could
be used for further search for plastic parts.  MRI cannot be used
on patients with metal implants.  Cost of MRI is about $450.

   There you have it folks.  A review of how synthetic telepathy
was discovered, how it works, ways to detect it and objectively
record it.  Not a perfect solution, but hopefully a start towards
monitoring, validating, and correcting the problem of involuntary
mind control experimentation and harassment of innocent Victims.

                           REFERENCES

(1)  Frey, A.H. "Auditory System Response to Radio Frequency
Energy", _Aerospace Med._ 32:1140-1142, 1961.

(2)  Lin, James C., _Microwave Auditory Effects and
Applications_, Charles C. Thomas Publisher, Springfield, IL, USA,
1978.

(3)  Justesen, Don R., "Microwaves and Behavior", _Am.
Psychologist_, 30:391-401, 1975.

(4)  King, N.W. "The Effects of Low-Level Microwave Irradiation
Upon Reflexive, Operant, and Discriminative Behaviors of the
Rat", unpublished doctoral dissertation.  University of Kansas,
1969.

         King, N.W., Justesen, D.R., and Clarke, R.L.,
"Behavioral Sensitivity to Microwave Radiation", _Science_,
172:398-401, 1971.

(5)  Guy, Arthur W., Chou, C.K., Lin, James C., and Christensen,
D., "Microwaved-Induced Acoustic Effects in Mammalian Auditory
Systems and Physical Materials", _Ann. NY Acad. Sci._,
247:194-218, 1975.

(6)  Chou, C.K., Galambos, R., Guy, A.W., and Lovely, R.H.,
"Cochlear Microphonics Generated by Microwave Pulses", _J.
Microwave Power_, 10:361-367, 1975.

(7)  Sharp, Joseph C., Grove, H. Mark, and Gandhi, Om P.,
"Generation of Acoustic Signals by Pulsed Microwave Energy",
_IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech._, Vol. MTT-22, pp.583-584,
1974.

(8)  Rapin, Isabella and Graziana, Leonard J., "Auditory Evoked 
Responses in Normal, Brain Damaged and Deaf Infants", 
_Neurology_ (Minn,), 17:881- 894, 1967.

(9)  Sohmer, H., Feinmessen, M., and Szabo, G., "Sources of
Electrocochleographic Responses as Studied in Patients With Brain
Damage", _Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol._ 37:663-669, 1974.

(10) Caceres, Cesar A., ed., _Biomedical Telemetry_, Academic
Press, New York, London, 1965.

(11) Breaksell, C.C., and Parker, C.S., "Radio Transmission of
the Human Electroencephalogram and Other Electrophysiological
Data",  _Electroencephalog. Clin. Neurophysiol._ 2, 243, 1949.

(12) Shipton, H.W., "A Simple Telemetering System for
Electrophysiological Data", _Electroencephlog. Clin.
Neurophysiol._ 12, 922, 1960.

(13) Thomas, D.E. and Klein J.M., "How to Construct a Miniature
FM Transmitter", _Electronics_, 32, 80, 1959.

(14) Blechman, Fred, "Build an FM Stereo Transmitter", _Popular
Electronics_, February 1995, pp. 33-36, 91.

(15) Holter, N.J. and Gengerelli, J.A., "Remote Recording of
Physiological Data by Radio", _Rocky Mt. Med. J._, 46, 749, 1949.

(16) Kamp, A. and Storm van Leeuwen, W., "A Two Channel EEG Radio
Telemetering System", _Electroencephalog. Clin. Neurophysiol._,
13,803, 1961.

(17) Kousnetzov, A.G., "Some Results of Biological Experiments in
Rockets and Sputnik II", _J. Activation Med._, 29, 781, 1958.

(18)  Delgado, Jose M.R., "Intracerebral Radio Stimulation and
Recording in Completely Free Patients", _Psychotechnology,
Electronic Control of Mind and Behavior_, Schweitzgebel, Robert
L. and Schweitzgebel, Ralph K., eds., Holt, Rinehart and Winston,
Inc. NY, 1973, pp. 184-198.

          Reprint from _The Journal of Nervous and Mental
Disease_, The Williams and Wilkins Company, Vol. 147, 34, 1968.

(19) Mark, V.H. and Ervin F. "The Relief of Chronic Severe Pain
by Stereotactic Surgery," _Pain and the Neurosurgeon: A Forty
Years' Experience_, Springfield, IL, Charles C. Thomas, 1969, pp.
not given.

                            * * * * *

================================================================
    
    ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
    ||  ||||  |      |       |  |      |      |   |   |   |   ||
    |||  ||  ||  |||||  |||  |  |  |||||  ||  |  | |  |  | |  ||
    ||||    |||  ,,,,|      ||  |  |||||  ||  |  |||  |  |||  ||
    |||||  ||||      |  |||  |  |      |      |  |||  |  |||  sm
    ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
    || VERICOMM BBS 510.891.0303/MindNet : vericomm@linex.com ||
    ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
         


From ham@ix.netcom.com Wed Jan 22 14:03:22 1997
Newsgroups: alt.mindcontrol
Subject: Re: Mindcontrol Tools
From: ham@ix.netcom.com(William Mayers)
Date: 22 Jan 1997 14:03:22 GMT

 Synthetic telepathy is a term used to describe the beaming of
>words, thoughts, or ideas into a person's mind by mechanical
>means, specifically, some type of electromagnetic transmitter,
>similar to a radio or television broadcast, operating in the
>microwave frequency band.

However, numerous laws of physics are misstated here, to say nothing of
wildly inaccurate presumptions regarding human anatomy and physiology, 

>   Humans have been hearing voices in their heads since the
>beginning of time.

It's called "schizophrenia", and is a severe disorder of thought
processes, which in it's most severe manifestations, renders the
individual incapable of functioning outside his or her hallucinatory
world.

  But to hear voices originating
>from outside the head when there is no other person present is to
>cause a dilemma.

This is so, because the delusions can so frighten and disorient the
schizophrenic that he or she undertakes dangerous, often suicidal,
efforts to resist them.  Other victims of this mental illness come to
believe that the voices are direct from God or some other all-knowing
entity, and represent commands that must be obeyed, however
unreasonable they may seem to ordinary people and however unreasonable
the risk to the person with the illness.  At it's worst, schizophrenia
demands that the sufferer be institutionalised, ofttimes involuntarily,
and medicated, ofttimes also involuntarily, as they present a clear and
present danger to themselves and/or others.

  The Bible is replete with
>accounts of humans hearing and responding to voices in the air.

As are the sacred writings of all the world's religions.  
>
>   Persons who claim regularly to communicate with unseen beings
>have been 
>subjected to electroshock therapy,
>a kind of torture used to convince the patient that it is better
>to discontinue such claims. 

This is a wholly inaccurate description of the valid medical proceedure
known as electroconvulsive therapy.  It dips into common
misconceptions, such as was demonstrated in the movie "One Flew Over
The Cuckoo's Nest", wherein a writhing, desperately struggling patient
was forcibly restrained and barbarically subjected to torture via
electric current, as "punishment" for disobediance and evidencing
individuality.
Electroconvulsive therapy, in reality, is quite otherwise.  The patient
is anesthetized and treated with every care and consideration offered a
patient undergoing surgery.  A highly trained and experienced physician
directs the proceedure and applies the theraputic current.  The patient
feels nothing, and is completly unaware of the process.  Occasionally,
there will be visual evidence of the application of current, such as a
minor twitching of one of the patient's toes.
Following therapy, the patient is transferred to an area in which he or
she is as closely monitored and cared for as would be anyone awakening
from anesthesia following an appendectomy or a gall-bladder removal. 
Once the patient is awake and stable, he or she is transferred back to
his or her own bed, where the patient remains under the skilled care
and observation of highly trained, licensed nursing personell.

>   The first, and perhaps only, officially reported scientific
>experiment documenting a case of synthetic telepathy - the one
>that everyone makes reference to - cannot be found in the
>literature.  Here's what happened.

Isn't it interesting that this writer first states that there is no
evidence for her claims, and then presents herself as being somehow
uniquely knowledgable about a non-event. The mystery deepens as the
writer goes on to postulate the existance, after saying that there is
no evidence, of additional research directly documenting the original
research - which, remember, is nowhere documented, according to her.

<HUGE snip>

The writer goes on to demonstrate a profound lack of accurate knowledge
of both radiation physics and of human anatomy and physiology on the
part of a number of authors whose work she proffers as "evidence" of
the existance of "microwave hearing".  It is worth noting that of the
many, many papers presented for publication, few make their way past
the purely objective, knowledgable editors and reviewers of the
professional press, but that junk occasionally slips through.  This is
the case here - the "science" represented by the works addressed here
as reference is junk science, as are the claims regarding a tremendous
epidemic of illness caused by breast implants and those regarding the
threat posed by dioxin.  Makes good stories for the tabloids and pulp
fiction novels, but it's lousy science.

Bill Mayers, RT, RN 



From barr@euclid.colorado.edu Mon Jan 20 15:50:57 1997
Newsgroups: alt.mindcontrol
Subject: Mindcontrol Tools
From: barr@euclid.colorado.edu (b)
Date: 20 Jan 1997 15:50:57 GMT

The following are excerpts from Congressional testimony titled
HUMAN DRUG TESTING BY THE CIA, 1977, Subcommittee on Health and Scientific
Research of the Committee on Human Resources. This Committee met on
September 20, 1977. This information was found on Microfiche CIS785411-19,
with the call #KF49.C6. It is an official US document.

			Opening Statement by Chairman
	Today the Health and Scientific Research Subcommittee resumes it's
inquiry into the biologic and behavioral activities off the Central Intellegence
Agency and the Department of Defense. The events we will hear about over the 
next 2 days occurred between 1952 and 1972. They had their origin in a different
time which had differnt values and realities. But it is important for us to 
fully understand these events today--because they raise fundamental quesitons
about what kind of society we are and what we want to become.
.....
	Individual Americans from all social levels, high and
low, were made the unwitting subjects of drug tests;scores of Universities
were used to further CIA research objectives without their knowledge, thus 
threatening in a fundamental way their traditional independence and integrity;
other Government agencies such as the Bureau of Narcotics, the National 
Institute of Health, and the Internal Revenue Service, were used to further
the programs and mission of the Central Intellegence Agency.
	These projects were not the creation of low-level agency bureaucrats
working against the wishes or without the knowledge of the Agency's leadership.
...

on to page 158
I. CODEWORD PROJECTS IDENTIFIED BY THE CENTRAL INTELLEGENCE AGENCY
	In testimony on August 3, 1977, before a joint session of the Senate
Select Committee on Intellegence and the Senate Committe on Health and
Scientific Research, the Director of Central Intelligence reported that the 
Central Intellegence Agency has located a number of boxes of documents, 
consisting largly of financial records, relating to experiments using human
subjects in which drugs were tested for mind-control and behavior modification
purposes. The Director testified that it appeared that three of the projects
described by these documents--projects designated MKSEARCH, MKOFTEN and 
MKCHICKWIT--were Department of Defense programs with which the CIA had had
some contact. The Director also described three other projects -- designated
MKULTRA< MKDELTA and MKNAOMI -- which were primarily CIA progects but which
might have had some Department of Defense involvement.
	It appears from the available documents that these projects cover 
subjects matters as follows:

MKDELTA: This was apparently the first project established by the CIA in
October, 1952, for the use of biochemicals in clandestine operations. It
may never have been implemented operationally.

MKULTRA: This was a successor project to MKDELTA established in April, 1953,
and terminating some time int the late 1960's probably after 1966. This progam
considered various means of controlling human behavior. Drugs were only one
aspect of this activity.

MKNAOMI: This project began in the 1950's and was terminated at least with
respect biological projects, in 1969. This may have been a successor to 
MKDELTA. Its purpose was to stockpile severly incapacitating and lethal 
materials, and to defvelop gadgetry for the dissemination of these materials.

MKSEARCH: This was apparently a successor project to MKULTRA, which began in
1965 and was terminated in 1973. The objective of the project was to develop
a capability to manipulate human behavior in a predictable manner through the
use of drugs.

MKCHICKWIT: This was apparantly a part of the MKSEARCH program. ITs objective
was to identify new drug developments in Europe and Asia and to obtain 
information and samples.

MKOFTEN: This was also apparently a part of the MKSEARCH project. Its objective
was to test the behavioral and toxicological effects of certain drugs on 
animals and humans.

II. ARMY PROGRAMS
	It appears from the available documents that the Army was involved in
one aspect of the CIA project designated as MKCHICKWIT and two aspects of a 
counterpart project designated MKOFTEN. The document search is described in
section A below, and eachof the Army programs is describe in section B below.

...

(The report continues for over 100 pages, you will have to look it up yourself
 but it does feature original testimony by the people involved as well as
 revealing original documents. It is these documents that were the source of
 Marks book "In Search of the Manchurian Candidate"

Contrary to what many people concluded, this type of research did not stop
in the 1970's nor has it stopped today. For an update on what is happening
today read Constantine's "Psychic Dictatorship of the USA".

From barr@euclid.colorado.edu Mon Jan 20 15:52:31 1997
Newsgroups: alt.mindcontrol
Subject: Mindcontrol Tools
From: barr@euclid.colorado.edu (b)
Date: 20 Jan 1997 15:52:31 GMT

In the mid 1970's some Official U.S. Government documents were released 
detailing the activities of the CIA. This is part of one such document.
Keep in mind, these activities were done with taxpayer dollars.

This 1955 CIA document reviews the Agency's research and development of a 
shocking list of mind-altering substances and methods, including "materials 
which will render the indication of hypnosis easier or otherwise enhance its 
usefulness," and "physical methods of producing shock and confusion over 
extended periods of time and capable of surreptitious use."  Also discusses
substance that induce "amnesia".

Doc D: MKULTRA Materials and Methods 

This 1955 CIA document reviews the Agency's research and development of a 
shocking list of mind-altering substances and methods, including "materials 
which will render the indication of hypnosis easier or otherwise enhance its i
usefulness," and "physical methods of producing shock and confusion over i
extended periods of time and capable of surreptitious use." 

5 May 1955

A portion of the Research and Development Program of TSS/Chemical Division is 
devoted to the discovery of the following materials and methods: 

1. Substances which will promote illogical thinking and impulsiveness to the 
point where the recipient would be discredited in public. 

2. Substances which increase the efficiency of mentation and perception. 

3. Materials which will prevent  counteract the intoxicating effect of alcohol. 

4. Materials which will promote the intoxicating effect of alcohol. 

5. Materials which will produce the signs and symptoms of recognized diseases 
in a reversible way so that they may be used for malingering, etc. 

6. Materials which will render the indication of hypnosis easier or otherwise 
enhance its usefulness. 

7. Substances which will enhance the ability of individuals to withstand 
privation, torture and coercion during interrogation and so-called 
"brainwashing". 

8. Materials and physical methods which will produce amnesia for events 
preceding and during their use. 

9. Physical methods of producing shock and confusion over extended periods of 
time and capable of surreptitious use. 

10. Substances which produce physical disablement such as paralysis of the 
legs, acute anemia, etc. 

11. Substances which will produce "pure" euphoria with no subsequent let-down. 

12. Substances which alter personality structure in such a way that the 
tendency of the recipient to become dependent upon another person is enhanced. 

13. A material which will cause mental confusion of such a type that the 
individual under its influence will find it difficult to maintain a fabrication 
under questioning. 

14. Substances which will lower the ambition and general working efficiency of i
men when administered in undetectable amounts. 

15. Substances which will promote weakness or distortion of the eyesight or 
hearing faculties, preferably without permanent effects. 

16. A knockout pill which can surreptitiously be administered in drinks, food, 
cigarettes, as an aerosol, etc., which will be safe to use, provide a maximum 
of amnesia, and be suitable for use by agent types on an ad hoc basis. 

17. A material which can be surreptitiously administered by the above routes 
and which in very small amounts will make it impossible for a man to perform 
any physical activity whatever. 

The development of materials of this type follows the standard practice of such 
ethical drug houses as [deleted]. It is a relatively routine procedure to 
develop a drug to the point of human testing. Ordinarily, the drug houses
depend upon the services of private physicians for the final clinical testing. 
The physicians are willing to assume the responsibility of such tests in order 
to advance the science of medicine. It is difficult and sometimes impossible 
for TSS/CD to offer such an inducement with respect to its products. In 
practice, it has been possible to use the outside cleared contractors for the 
preliminary phases of this work. However, that part which involves human 
testing at effective dose levels presents security problems which cannot be 
handled by the ordinary contractor. 

The proposed facility [deleted] offers a unique opportunity for the secure 
handling of such clinical testing in addition to the many advantages outline 
in the project proposal. The security problems mentioned above are eliminated 
by the fact that the responsibility for the testing will rest completely with 
the physician and the hospital.  [deleted] will allow TSS/CD personnel to 
supervise the work very closely to make sure that all tests are conducted 
according to the recognized practices and embody adequate safeguards. 


From ham@ix.netcom.com Wed Jan 22 13:18:34 1997
Newsgroups: alt.mindcontrol
Subject: Re: Mindcontrol Tools
From: ham@ix.netcom.com(William Mayers)
Date: 22 Jan 1997 13:18:34 GMT

In <5c042l$5ca@lace.colorado.edu> barr@euclid.colorado.edu (b) writes:

...writes for what must be the tenth time, repeating the same message
word-for-word.  He can't accept that the message is wrong, that it
represents junk science at it's worst.  He's obsessed with trying to
prove the unverifiable, and has become the laughingstock of the
Internet.  For the record, the material reprinted below contains gross
errors in radio physics, makes erroneous assumptions regarding human
anatomy and physiology, and is therefore worthless.

Bill Mayers

>There has been much discussion of "Microwave Hearing" phenomenon on
the net
>I was intrigued by this and have done some research. It turns out that

>microwave hearing does indeed exist. There is a fair sized body of
research
>available on the subject. This is one of the more complete reviews of
the
>subject. The entire article is long, and I am not going to post it
all.
>But I will review it.
>
>The name of the Article is:
>Auditory Perception of radio-frequency Electromagnetic Fields
>
>It appeared in:
>The Journal of Acoustical Society of America 1982 pages 1321-1334.
>
>It was written by:
>Chung-Kwang Chou and Arthur W. Guy
>The above authors were Phd Researchers at the University of Washington
as of
>the publication date of this article.
>
>This research was funded by:
>Office of Naval Intellegence, National Institute of Handicapped
Research, and
>Department of Education with a special thanks to Richard M. White of
University
>of California, Berkeley.
>
>INTRODUCTION
>Pulsed microwaves have been heard as sound by radar operators since
radar was
>invented during World War II. ...
>
>The earliest report we have found on the auditory perception of pulsed
micro-
>wave appeared in 1956 as an advertisement of the Airborne Instruments
Lab in  
>Proceedings of the IRE. The advertisement described observations made
in 1947
>on the hearing of sounds that occurred at the repetion rate of a radar
while
>the listener stood close to a horn antenna. When the observers first
told their
>coworkers in the Lab of their hearing experiences, they encountered
skepticism
>and RATHER POINTED QUESTIONS ABOUT THEIR MENTAL HEALTH. (emphasis this
author)
>
>...
>
>POWER LEVELS and FREQUENCY RANGE
>At very low frequency range (< 1MHz), a human-size biological object
absorbs
>very little radio-frequency energy; however, the absorption can be
appreciable 
>at the resonant frequency near 70-80 MHz (where the long dimension of
the
>body is approximately 0.4 wavelengths) (Durney etal. 1978). For a
human head, 
>the resonant frequency is near 600 Mhz....Although there is universal
agreement
>on the thermal effects of the highlevel (> 100
milliWatts/centimeter(squared))
>radio-frequency electromagnetic radiation, there is considerable
debate on the
>biological effects of low-level (< 100mWatts/cm2) electromagnetic
radiation.
>...
>The thresholds (for hearing ed) of average power density of fields at
the head
>were determined to be 0.4 and 2mW/cm2, respectively for the two
transmitters.
>...
>In another experiment they used a 2450MHz pulse generator with pulses
in the 
>0.5 to 32 microsecond width. The generator produced peak power of
10kW.
>Calculations indicated that the maximum amount of absorbed energy was 
>16 microJOULES/gram (They are talking microjoules per gram now instead
of
>milliwatts per cm squared. They use microjoules when they talk of
absorbed
>energy and milliwatts when talking about radiated wattage. The two are
related
>of course, but the energy absorbed depends on the makeup of the human
head,
>whereas the energy radiated is dependent on the transmission power).
(ED)
>...
>In another experiment thay used  5 to 15 microsecond pulses at 3 Ghz
frequency.
>
>DISCUSSION
>The microwave-induced auditory phenomenon is an example of a
microwave-
>biological interaction that has been WELL QUANTIFIED and has been
WIDELY
>ACCEPTED (emphasis this author) as a bonafide "weak-field" effect.
Although
>originally the hypothesis of a dirct nervous system stimulation was
proposed,
>the evidence is now strongly convincing that the hearing phenomenon is
related
>thermoelastically induced mechanical vibration. The same type of
vibration can 
>be produced by other means, e.g. by a laser pulse, or by activating a 
>piezoelectric crystal in contact with the skull (Hmm, implants? ed.).
>
>...
>
>The paper ends with about a page of references to other works, one of 
>which is Frey's paper published in 1963.
>
>So there you have it folks, Microwave hearing is fact, not fiction.
>


