<!DOCTYPE ETS PUBLIC "-//UMDLPS//DTD EEBOPROOF 2.0//EN">
<ETS>
<TEMPHEAD>
<REVDESCR>
<CHANGE>
<DATE>06-01-07</DATE>
<RESPSTMT>
<NAME>Mona Logarbo</NAME>
<RESP>MURP</RESP>
</RESPSTMT>
<ITEM>*Added TEMPHEAD, checked ID, and added TYPEs to DIVs in order to validate. 
*Checked for GROUP tags.
*Proofed title page(s). 
*Checked ^s. 
*Checked I / J.
*Checked oe for ae ligatures.
*Reviewed structure. 
*Checked placement and completeness of PBs. 
*Checked for duplicate pages.
*Checked for missing pages.
*Checked spacing of foreign GAPs.
*Checked for damage GAPs, #s, @s, mdash;, --s, <ABBR>Esq</ABBR>, frac;, and UNCLEARs. 
*Corrected $s by inserting the appropriate character(s) and / or GAP DESC(s). 
*Checked for amp;cs with incorrect spacing.
*Checked for OPENERs, SALUTEs, CLOSERs, DATEs, 
DATELINEs, SIGNEDs, BYLINEs, TRAILERs, ARGUMENTs, EPIGRAPHs, etc. 
*Checked for TABLEs and LISTs.
*Checked for LBs. 
*Checked for startqs, endqs and Qs. 
*Checked proofsheets and made corrections. 
DONE 06-01-07.</ITEM>
</CHANGE>
</REVDESCR>
</TEMPHEAD>
<EEBO>
<IDG S="marc" R="UM" ID="A85925">
<STC T="W">G564</STC>
<STC T="T">E510_1</STC>
<BIBNO T="umi">99862509</BIBNO>
<VID>114671</VID>
</IDG>
<TEXT LANG="eng">
<FRONT>
<DIV1 TYPE="title page">
<PB REF="1" MS="y">
<PB REF="1" MS="y">
<PB REF="2" MS="y">
<PB REF="2" MS="y">
<P>A LETTER
FROM S^R.
BALTHAZAR
GERBIER KNIGHT.</P>
<P>TO HIS THREE DAVGHTERS
<HI>INCLOSED.</HI></P>
<P>In a Nunnery att Paris.</P>
</DIV1>
</FRONT>
<BODY>
<DIV1 TYPE="letter">
<PB REF="3">
<PB N="3" REF="3">
<HEAD>MY DAVGHTERS ELIZABETH,
Su&s;anne and Marie.</HEAD>
<P>I Haue thought fitt to concude all my former letters to you
vvith this, thereunto mouved by Fatherley tendrene&s;&s;e to
admini&s;ter good and vvhol&s;ome things unto you: Care of
your Saluation to draue you from pernicious errors, and Iu&s;tice
to my &s;elfe to vindicate my &s;elfe from tho&s;e a&s;per&s;&s;ions as vvell
implicit as explicit layd uppon me on your &s;ubiect.</P>
<P>Fir&s;t therefore, &s;ince you vvith drevv your &s;elues from the
obedience to your Parents you haue vvritten that your EYES
haue bin Opened; and <GAP DESC="illegible" EXTENT="3 letters">t, it is &s;u&s;tayned on your one utte|rances
that you had noe Religion before you vvere taught
vvhat you novv &s;eeme to profe&s;&s;e.</P>
<P>As I do extreamly vvonder at it, &s;o i mu&s;t deeply lament
your ca&s;&s;e, &s;ince &s;uch a pretended and imaginary opening
mu&s;t be the vvorke of a Spirit of &s;trong DILVZION, Such as
could per&s;uade our fir&s;t Parents in EDEN that they vvere
blinde; and that vvhen they should follo<GAP DESC="illegible" EXTENT="1 letter">vv his adui&s;e, theire
EYES vvould be opened, and that they should knovve good
and Euill: Such an opening I iu&s;tly feare is yours.</P>
<P>No vvonder that you haue bin thus &s;urpri&s;ed vvhen once
you gaue both your eares to charmers; and neuer lent one to
your be&s;t and a&s;&s;ured friends your Parents: to vvhome you
neuer gaue any intimation of your re&s;olution vvhat you
vvould do: Onlly you lett your Parents Knovve (in fievv
vvords (but to late) vvhat you had don, leauing that iniurious
brand on them that during your aboade under theire roofe
you (as before &s;aid) had no Religion, and that they kept
you in blindne&s;&s;e.</P>
<P>You vvere Babtifed in te name of GOD the Father the
SONNE, and the HOLLY Go&s;t.</P>
<P>Vvhen you came to yares you vvere vnder my roofe in&s;tru|cted
in the Articles of the Chri&s;tian beleefe.</P>
<P><PB N="4" REF="4">
You vvere taught the ten Commandements, deliuered by
God in tvvo tables on Mount Sina&iuml; to MOSES.</P>
<P>You vvere taught the Lords prayer being the Sommary of
all things nece&s;&s;ary for us to demande of God: and hovv vvith
an humble and eleuated Soule (on bended kne&eacute;s) you should
povver forth your &s;upplications unto him: You vvere taught
hovv you should receaue the ble&s;&s;ed Communion of te Boddy
and Bludd of our Lord IESVS-CHRIST: and vvhen ripne&s;&s;e
of yeares permitted, you vvere thereto prepared; called, and
admitted, and continued publickly in that practi&s;e.</P>
<P>Vvhen you came to more &s;trenckt (lea&s;t you should fall
into tho&s;e nets vvherein novv allas you are intangled bycau&s;e
my employments under his (Maie&s;tie of greate Britaine in the
Re&s;idency att Bruxels during the &s;pace of Eleuen yeares occa|&s;ionned
my nece&s;&s;ary conuer&s;&s;ation vvith Papi&s;ts.) you vvere
taught the &s;olide an&s;vveares to all the vveake&punc; obiections of
the Roman Sect, concerning their pretenc to ANT QVITI,
VNIVERSSALLITI, VNIFORMITI, MIRACLES, and
the re&s;t. The&s;e being the mayne props of there ruinous buil|ding.</P>
<P>You vvere in&s;tructed that ANTIQVITI is not to be deter|mined
by any Epi&s;copall Sea profe&s;&s;ing Chri&s;tiannity, but by
conformity unto the vvord of God: deliuered unto us by
Chri&s;t Ie&s;us, his Apo&s;tles, Euangeli&s;ts, and Diciples, compri&s;ed
by the Author of Saluation in the tvvo Commandements of
LOVE.</P>
<P>For iff all other Chri&s;tians should &s;ince the Apo&s;tles time
to this in&s;tant haue continued in &agrave; Doctrine contrary to the
expre&s;&s;e doctrine of Chri&s;t and his Apo&s;tles vvich is the do|ctrine
of Loue (as a for&s;aid] and that but ye&s;terday theire had
ri&s;en &agrave; congregation profe&s;&s;ing and practi&s;ing trully the &s;aid
Doctrine, it mu&s;t needs be concluded that the&s;e vvould clay|me
ANTIQVITI before the other, becau&s;e the me&s;ure of
Chri&s;tianity mu&s;t be the &s;aid doctrine of Chri&s;t and his Apo&s;t|les,
from vvich &s;ource Antiquiti takes its Original.</P>
<P>Iff this be not the Ancient and true Religion nece&s;&s;ary to
&s;aluation, and tho&s;e markes the true &s;ignes of its Antiquiti
vvhat markes then?</P>
<P><PB N="5" REF="4">
This i am &s;ure vve profe&s;&s;e and indeaviour to practi&s;e, The|refore
vve cannot haue any brand <GAP DESC="illegible" EXTENT="1 word"> Noualty ca&s;t uppon us,
butt rather it vvill light uppon you, vvho both in Doctrine and
practi&s;e infringe the parfaict lavve of LOVE.</P>
<P>you vvere in&s;tructed that VNIVERSSALLITI mu&s;t ex|tend
to the greater number.</P>
<P>Iff vve looke on all tho&s;e that profe&s;&s;e the Chri&s;tian Reli|gion
you shall finde tho&s;e that adherre to the Church of Ro|me
feeuer in nomber, nay in extent and dominions then vve
are.</P>
<P>Seuenthien entire Kingdomes are inhabitted by Legions
of Chri&s;tians under the dominion of him vvhoe vve call
PRESTEIAN vvhere the EFNVC of Ethiopia (beloning to
Queene CANDAS) vvich PILLIP conuerted &s;etled the true
Chri&s;tian beleefe unanimou&s;ley profe&s;&s;ing the &s;ame theire
untill this pre&s;ent day, and agreeing in Tenents more vvith
us then vvith you: Chri&s;tiannity is practi&s;ed throughout the
Kingdomes of England, Scotland, Suede, Dannemarc, Nor|vvege,
Tra~&s;iluanya, Holland, Zuit&s;erland vvith the annexed
Cantons and Geneua: all vvich are intire, and all to gether
independant on the Sea of Rome: be&s;ides many bodies in the|&s;e
&s;euerall Kingdomes and Prouinces in&s;uing to vvete, France,
Germany, Bohemia, Poland, Ireland, and Flandres, vvere com|puting
the one vvith the other the one halfe doth di&s;avoue
the &s;aid Sea of Rome: So that theire remaynes but Spaine and
Italy intire acknolledging the Popes &s;uppremacij.</P>
<P>Vvhereby it is cleerely manife&s;ted that Vniuer&s;&s;allity is
not an anex of the Sea of Rome.</P>
<P>Vvhat should men &s;peake of &s;euerall Religions not Chri|&s;tians,
the Mahumetan religion farre more vniuer&s;&s;all then
the Chri&s;tian religion; and Headeni&s;me of larger extent then
they both, vvitne&s;&s;e the va&s;t AMERICA, be&s;ids greate and
many kingdomes in ASIA, and AFRICA, one only king
being as pouerfull as all the kings of Europe putt to gether.</P>
<P>Vvhereby is manife&s;ted that the tuo mayne Markes
vvhere to the Romam Church pretends to confirme it &s;elfe
to be the true Church of Chri&s;t doe faille it.</P>
<P><PB N="6" REF="5">
For the conformity in Doctrine (vvich the Roman tea+chers vvill haue annother marke of the true Church) allas
it is no other then vvhat euery &s;ect and Religion in the vvorld
hath common vvith them.</P>
<P>All the Caluini&s;ts doe perfectly agree in Tenents. Luthe|rans
the &s;ame; &s;o lickvvei&s;e the Socinians, Anababti&s;ts: Famil|li&s;ts,
Antinomiens, Nicholaitans, vvith all other Chri&s;tian
&s;ects.</P>
<P>The Ievves do perfecty agree in opinions, yet allas they
are &s;o fallen from truth that they crucified the Lord of truth
and continue unrepentent.</P>
<P>The Mahumetans do perfectly agree; yet they are &s;o farre
from being the true Church that they are not honnored vvith
the title of Chri&s;tianitii.</P>
<P>All conbinations of Headenish Idollators do agree in their
opinions: vvhereby it is cleerly euident to any not blinde that
conformity in Doctrine is likvvei&s;e no expre&s;&s;e marke of the
true Church of God.</P>
<P>For MIRACLES, they are promi&s;t unto faith, and vvhere|&s;oeuer
that is found no greater then a graine of Mo&s;tart &s;ee|de,
miracles may be vvraught, as theire are manife&s;t Exam|p<GAP DESC="illegible" EXTENT="1 letter">es&punc;
iff, hi&s;tories and relations maybe beleeued.</P>
<P>The Religious among the Turcks do daily vvorke Mira|cles:
It is not inpertinent in this place to tell the Story of a
Turckis Emperor that defeated a Chri&s;tian Ho&s;t, vvho had
broken faith; he being routed, rallied againe, called uppon
Ch<GAP DESC="illegible" REASON="missing" EXTENT="1 letter">i&s;t Ie&s;us (in vvho&s;e name the Peace had bin Svvorne) ad|iured
him to reuenge him uppon tho&s;e that had taken his na|me
in vayne, for in his name he vvould fight.</P>
<P>That miracles are vvraught by Prote&s;tants theire are &s;e|uerall
examples: butt that they are not &s;o frequently boa&s;ted
off and for&s;talled among them is becau&s;e of theire comon
Tenents that Miracles are cea&s;&s;ed finding no u&s;e of them, the
Ch<GAP DESC="illegible" EXTENT="1 letter">i&s;tian doctrine being e&s;tablished, and Miracles being pro&s;|mi&s;&s;ed
in the latter dayes as a marke of Antichri&s;t by the ex|pre&s;&s;ion
of Lying vvonders.</P>
<P>The true markes of Gods Church are true LOVE and CHA|RITI.
<PB N="7" REF="5">
For theire by you shall knoue true Chri&s;tians, Chri&s;t
Ie&s;us &s;aith, iff you Loue one annother thereby you shalbe
knoune to be myne: And the effect of that true LOVE is the
unction from the Holly Go&s;t vvich S. Ihoan &s;peakes of tvvice:
vvhere&s;oeuer that onction is to be found theire you shall fin|de
the true Church and no vvere el&s;&s;e.</P>
<P>Chri&s;t Ie&s;us &s;aid that his Kingdome vvas not off this vvorld,
vvich is full of hate, &s;triffe, and malice. Can theire be a thing
further of from Loue, then to condemne Chri&s;tians to Hell,
and that for bare opinions?</P>
<P>Can theire be a more &s;infull in&s;olent pre&s;umption then to
exclude Heauen the &s;ource off mercy and compa&s;&s;ion to any
penitent Sinner that runes to Chri&s;t Ie&s;us, that puts all his ho|pes
in him that beleeues in him, that thir&s;teth after him, as
the heart panteth after the vvater brookes?</P>
<P>Can theire be a greater deprauedne&s;&s;e then that vvich
Teachers breath forth of di&s;obedience tovvards Souueraines,
&s;uppe<GAP DESC="illegible" EXTENT="1 letter">iours, and Parents, taking no other grounds for &s;uch
le&s;&s;ons then difference of opinions?</P>
<P>Can theire be a more inpertinent Tenent then to &s;u&s;tayne
that Chri&s;tians should be damned iff they do not beleeue and
do all vvhat the particullar Sea of Rome doth determine;
&s;ince it is no more fre from errors then other Sects? But
that i may come home to you my Children, iff you could
take off tho&s;e &s;pectacles through vvich you looke novv, vvich
shue all things reuer&s;t, then vvould you &s;ee your Duty: Then
vvould you &s;ee next unto to Seruice and reuerence due to
God your Heauenly father, vvhat your Duty is to your Pa|rents,
vvhereuppon you vvould conclude that tho&s;e vvho per|&s;uaded
you to &s;ett a&s;ide obedience to Parents do delude you
vvith pernicious Tenents: among the re&s;t, that you cannot
do your Duty to Parents nor &s;e them vvithout indangering
your Saluation, your one vvords; Neither can ho&s;e blanchers
(in your la&s;t letter to me) any vvayes fre you of his Iu&s;t Cen|&s;ure
that you conclude your Parents to be in the number of
the Damned, and &s;o argue you to profe&s;&s;e &agrave; Sect voide of all
Chri&s;tianity, &s;ince you haue no LOVE nor CHARITI and
that you do tran&s;gre&s;&s;e the Diuine precepts of Chri&s;t vvho for|bids
<PB N="8" REF="6" MS="y">
that vve should Iudge one annother: Iudgment belongs
to God, and to none el&s;e, for he &s;aith <HI>Iudgment is mine.</HI></P>
<P>you vvould &s;ee indeed that the pretended opening off your
EYES proues a <GAP DESC="illegible" REASON="missing" EXTENT="1 letter">hutting upp of your &s;piritual EYES.</P>
<P>Certailny iff you could Seriou&s;ly meditate on your &s;aid
vvords, vvithout any inuitations or any of my arguments con|clude
all this to be true: As i haue &s;uid before you haue bin
duely and carefully in&s;tructed in the principles of the true
CHRISTIAN beleefe, and helt to its practi&s;e as much as
lay in your Parents to do.</P>
<P>you my Danghter SVSANNE you mu&s;t likvvei&s;e acknovv|ledge
the &s;ame truth in your one particullar; and for the-care
I had to place you according to your one de&s;ires vvith a
mo&s;t virtious Prince&s;&s;e, the Duche&s;&s;e of TRIMOVILLE (re|puted
for an example of Piety) yet you vvere &s;educed by the &s;a|me
Spirits of Diluzion vvho had vvraught on your tvvo other
Si&s;ters, vvho moued you to runne from the &s;aid Duche&s;&s;e as
they had runne from me, and all this you Knovve on a preten|ce
of vvorldly preferment: for &s;o you vvritte to me, vvhen
you gaue me notice of the pretended opening of your EYES
as that of your tvvo other Si&s;ters. Allas poore Su&s;anne could
you not reflect on your name iff you forgatt your profe&s;&s;ion,
and re&s;i&s;t the Tempters; you felt no finger of GOD to tutch
your EyES.</P>
<P>Allas poor Children the&s;e falce pretences ca~not excu&s;e you.</P>
<P>And you my poore daughter MARIE, its but to Manife&s;t
that your e&s;cappe from your Pare~ts vvithout theire Knovvled|ge
vvas re&s;olued on fievv dayes after that the eldi&s;t of you
(vvho pulled you as a sheepe is dravvne to &s;lavghter) held
in quality of God Mother a Child in the prote&s;tant Church
att Charenton.</P>
<P>It is certayne that neither she nor any one of you did &s;in|ce
that time &s;ee any Heauenly vi&s;ion, nor heared you any ex|pre&s;&s;e
voyce of God, nor Angel call you from your profe&s;&s;ion
and beleefe, nor could you in &s;o feevv dayes &s;tudy any contro|uer&s;&s;es
that could argue to your minds that you had liued in
blindne&s;&s;e unto that uery in&s;tant.</P>
<P><PB N="9" REF="6">
You my daughter MARIE vvere &s;aid to haue att your fir&s;t
being among the Eng<GAP DESC="illegible" EXTENT="1 letter">i&s;<GAP DESC="illegible" EXTENT="1 letter"> Nunns almo&s;t conuerted &s;omme by
tho&s;e principles of the Religion you haue bin Babti&s;ed in,
taught and profe&s;t, and that you did ever &s;ay you vvould be
no NVNNE. But allas you to &s;oone fell avvay from the &s;aid
principles, yet are you &s;ome vvay excu&s;able bycau&s;e you are
the Ionge&s;t, and that you vvere Kept in &s;o &s;trickt a pri&s;on by
your guardiens, that you vvere not permitted to reade my
letters, nor receaue the vvhol&s;ome Councell &s;ent you.</P>
<P>Butt you my eldi&s;t daugh<GAP DESC="illegible" REASON="missing" EXTENT="1 letter">er Elizabeth you vvere reported to
procede vvith &s;o much bouldne&s;&s;e, &s;o much forgetfulne&s;&s;e to
your Parents, &s;o much iniu&s;tice to your &s;elffe and in&s;iuillity
to many that did vvish you vvel euen again&s;t the per&s;&s;on of
the reuerend B<GAP DESC="illegible" EXTENT="2 letters">hop of London Derry and again&s;t other Di|uines,
as that you vvould not after theire fir&s;t vi&s;itations affor|de
them any fitt impartiall hearing: All this you<GAP DESC="illegible" EXTENT="1 letter"> did vvith
breach of Diuine lavvs; the Lavv of Nature, the fondamen|tall
Lavvs of the land, and the Lavvs of Nations, vvhen you
vvould be carried and maintayned again&s;t your Parents vvith
a Strong hand: vvith armed men, vvho did vva&s;t you to a
Nunnery vvith Pi&s;tols, vvich vvere &s;eene by a vvhole multi|tude
and offered to be di&s;charged again&s;t my men, that did
runne to &s;top your Coach, follovved by me your father, vvho
vvas con&s;trayned (by the Suddannis of the Surpri&s;all) to runne
a foote through the durt of the &s;treets of Paris in pro&s;ecution
of you my Children; to try iff I could re&s;cu you frome the
Lyons pavves, follovving you to the gates of the Mon|na&s;tery,
vvitch vvere shutt again&s;t me, and vvhere you vvere
detayned.</P>
<P>Thus on my particullar hath bin practi&s;ed an iniu&s;tice vvit|hout
example, &s;ince all Parents are permitted to haue free acces
to theire Children in a neuter place, yet they be admitted to
take any religious orders.</P>
<P>All vvich con&s;idered, you may &s;ee hovv falacious that rea|&s;on
is [vvich you &s;ay in one of your letters to me] to haue
bin te ground vvorke of vvhat you do in he&s;e vvores. Vi<GAP DESC="illegible" EXTENT="1 letter">z.
<HI>My rea&s;on hath alvvayes shevved and conuinced me that they di|rect
vvhat is most good &amp;c.</HI></P>
<P><PB N="10" REF="7" MS="y">
To vvich I mu&s;t repeate my former an&s;vveare, that your
REASON be the touch-&s;tone of theire directions your rea|&s;on
being falacious and contrary to the Diuine rea&s;on, expre&s;t
in the Diuine vvord; then off nece&s;&s;ity theire Councell agreeing
vvith your REASON mu&s;t be as eronius as your REASON;
and con&s;equently both de&s;erue to be refo<GAP DESC="illegible" EXTENT="1 letter">rmed by the Ordi|nances
of God; vvich commands Obedience unto Parents,
ordinances that are infa<GAP DESC="illegible" REASON="missing" EXTENT="1 letter">ible.</P>
<P>your One REASONS indeed are the effect of your one
Motions, iff there fore your Motions be &s;ubiect te erre vvhy
not your REASON?</P>
<P>And vvhere yon are novv taught to beleeue or att lea&s;t to
vvritte as of late you did <HI>that you are in an extreame re&s;t and &s;e|curity,
&amp;c.</HI> I mu&s;t againe tell you that theire are no Atei&s;ts
but re&s;ts &s;ecurer and quietter in con&s;ience then you can be, for
they haue no &s;cruple though they doe neuer &s;o vvickedly;
and therefore your prete~ded &s;ecurity is butt &agrave; &s;iprituall Letar|gy:
Liuing vnder your Parents roofe you did behold tho&s;e
vvho&s;e predece&s;&s;ors shedd theire bludd for the defence of Re|ligion,
the &s;ame that your Parents haue euer profe&s;t and vvhe|rein
you vvere Babti&s;ed, in&s;tructed, and vvich you al&s;o did
publikly profe&s;&s;e, the &s;ame Religion for vvich yout Father
&s;ufferd euen in his mothers vvombe, she flying the bluddy per|&s;ecutions.</P>
<P>You ranne avvay not for Religion, butt from Religion.</P>
<P>You had Coatches to tran&s;port you from your Duty.</P>
<P>You could neuer &s;ince like Io&s;eph make readdy &agrave; Charet
to tran&s;port you to your Duty: to vi&s;itte your Parents and re|ceaue
theire ble&s;&s;ing, he vvent to go&s;&s;en, and carried his tvvo
Sonnes vvith him, you vvould not come your &s;elffe the lenght
of &agrave; feeld, nor permitt your tvvo &s;i&s;ters to come.</P>
<P>Vvell poore Children, the God of mercy and compa&s;&s;ion
open the EyES of your Soules and minds truely, &s;o to looke
on your &s;elues, as that you may duely con&s;ider vvhence you
are come, hovv you are gone forth from the unitie into di&s;|&s;ention,
that you, haue for&s;aken te Doctrine of LOVE, and
layd hold on OSTENTATION, not con&s;idering that the
<PB N="11" REF="7">
Doctrine of Chri&s;t is nothing el&s;e butt a BROTHERLEy
LOVE, vvhereby God bindeth him &s;elfe unto us in Chri&s;t and
vve to him. That all teaching mu&s;t ay me att that, as al&s;o all
all ovvr villing, liuing and doing, and that vvho&s;oeuer tea|cheth
and doth othervvayes, is BABEL, and a meere FABLE;
a carued vvorke of pride&punc; in i<GAP DESC="illegible" EXTENT="1+ letters"> profitable Iudgings: and di|&s;turbings
of the vvorld, and hipocri&s;ie of the Diuill vvhere|vvith
he blindeth &s;impliciti, vvhen he talkes of OPENING
of EyES.</P>
<P>May you &s;o do your Duty to God and to your Neighbours
(the fir&s;t vvheroff your Parents are) that you maybe a&s;&s;ured
(in his infalible promi&s;&s;es to all penitent Sinners that turne
unto rightiou&s;ne&s;&s;e) to &s;ee the true light that enlightned eue|ry
man that commeth into the vvorld.</P>
<P>And that finally you may heare &s;poken unto you come yea
ble&s;&s;ed of my father inheritte the Kingdome prepared for
you from the fondation of the vvorld, the vvishes of</P>
<CLOSER><SIGNED>your louing Father
BALTHAZAR GERBIER.</SIGNED>
<DATELINE>Paris <DATE>the 4. of May 1646.</DATE></DATELINE></CLOSER>
</DIV1>
</BODY>
</TEXT>
</EEBO>
</ETS>
