THE TREATISE OF ATHENAGORAS
THE TREATISE OF ATHENAGORAS
CHAP. I.—DEFENCE OF THE TRUTH SHOULD PRECEDE DISCUSSIONS REGARDING IT.[1]
CHAP. II.—A RESURRECTION IS NOT IMPOSSIBLE.
CHAP. III.—HE WHO COULD CREATE, CAN ALSO RAISE UP THE DEAD.
CHAP. IV.—OBJECTION FROM THE FACT THAT SOME HUMAN BODIES HAVE BECOME PART OF OTHERS.
CHAP. V.—REFERENCE TO THE PROCESSES OF DIGESTION AND NUTRITION.
CHAP. VI.—EVERYTHING THAT IS USELESS OR HURTFUL IS REJECTED.
CHAP. VII. —THE RESURRECTION-BODY DIFFERENT FROM THE PRESENT.
CHAP. VIII.—HUMAN FLESH NOT THE PROPER OR NATURAL FOOD OF MEN.
CHAP. IX.—ABSURDITY OF ARGUING FROM MAN'S IMPOTENCY.
CHAP. X.—IT CANNOT BE SHOWN THAT GOD DOES NOT WILL A RESURRECTION.
CHAP. XI.—RECAPITULATION.
CHAP. XII.—ARGUMENT FOR THE RESURRECTION. FROM THE PURPOSE CONTEMPLATED IN MAN'S CREATION.
CHAP. XIII.—CONTINUATION OF THE ARGUMENT.
CHAP. XIV.—THE RESURRECTION DOES NOT REST SOLELY ON THE FACT OF A FUTURE JUDGMENT.
CHAP. XV.—ARGUMENT FOR THE RESURRECTION FROM THE NATURE OF MAN.
CHAP. XVI—ANALOGY OF DEATH AND SLEEP, AND CONSEQUENT ARGUMENT FOR THE RESURRECTION.
CHAP. XVII.—THE SERIES OF CHANGES WE CAN NOW TRACE IN MAN RENDERS A RESURRECTION PROBABLE.
CHAP. XVIII.—JUDGMENT MUST HAVE REFERENCE BOTH TO SOUL AND BODY: THERE WILL THEREFORE BE A RESURRECTION.
CHAP. XIX.—MAN WOULD BE MORE UNFAVOURABLY SITUATED THAN THE BEASTS IF THERE WERE NO RESURRECTION.
CHAP. XX.—MAN MUST BE POSSESSED BOTH OF A BODY AND SOUL HEREAFTER, THAT THE JUDGMENT PASSED UPON HIM MAY BE JUST.
CHAP. XXI.—CONTINUATION OF THE ARGUMENT.
CHAP. XXII.—CONTINUATION OF THE ARGUMENT.
CHAP. XXIII.—CONTINUATION OF THE ARGUMENT.
CHAP. XXIV.—ARGUMENT FOR THE RESURRECTION FROM THE CHIEF END OF MAN.
CHAP. XXV.—ARGUMENT CONTINUED AND CONCLUDED.
This page copyright © 2002 Blackmask Online.
http://www.blackmask.com